Skip to main content
Log in

An Evaluation Model of Supply Chain Performances Using 5DBSC and LMBP Neural Network Algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A high efficient Supply Chain (SC) would bring great benefits to an enterprise such as integrated resources, reduced logistics costs, improved logistics efficiency and high quality of overall level of services. So it is important to research various methods, performance indicator systems and technology for evaluating, monitoring, predicting and optimizing the performance of a SC. In this paper, the existing performance indicator systems and methods are discussed and evaluated. Various nature- inspired algorithms are reviewed and their applications for SC Performance Evaluation (PE) are discussed. Then, a model is proposed and developed using 5 Dimensional Balanced Scorecard (5DBSC) and LMBP (Levenberg-Marquardt Back Propagation) neural network for SC PE. A program is written using Matlab tool box to implement the model based on the practical values of the 14 indicators of 5DBSC of a given previous period. This model can be used to evaluate, predict and optimize the performance of a SC. The analysis results of a case study of a company show that the proposed model is valid, reliable and effective. The convergence speed is faster than that in the previous work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beamon B M. Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 1999, 19, 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen K. Research and Practice of the Models of Supply Chain Performance in Manufacturing Industry, PhD thesis, Tianjin University, 2009. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolch G, Greine S, Meer H D, Trivedi K S. Queuing Networks and Markov Chains: Modeling and Performance Evaluation with Computer Science Applications, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Yi K G. KPI assessment: Study of implication, workflow and counter measures. Technological Economy, 2005, 24, 48–49. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Estampe D, Lamouri S, Paris T. A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 142, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart G. Supply-chain operations reference model (SCOR): The first cross-industry framework for integrated supply-chain management. Logistics Information Management, 1997, 10, 62–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan R S, Norton D P. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 1992, 70, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boxwell R. Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vincent J F V, Bogatyreva O A, Bogatyrev N R, Bowyer A, Pahl A-K. Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2006, 3, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren L. Progress in the bionic study on anti-adhesion and resistance reduction of terrain machines. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52, 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson P. Fitness for the Future: Applying Biomimetics to Business Strategy, PhD thesis, Bath University, UK, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y. Application of GA and SVM to the performance evaluation of supply chain. Computer Engineering and Application, 2010, 46, 246–248. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shi C D, Chen J H, Hu J. Study of supply chain performances using rough sets and neural network. Computer Engineering and Application, 2007, 43, 203–245. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xi Y F, Wang C, Nie X X. Study of the evaluation methods of supply chain performances using fuzzy neural network. Information Journal, 2007, 9, 77–79. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen K, Shaw Y. Applying back propagation network to cold chain temperature monitoring. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2011, 25, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu X Z, Zhou H, Liang C H. Optimisation of multi-layer supply chains using particle swarm optimisation algorithm. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2010, 16, 127–132. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao X, Dian J. Analysis of the current situations of methods for evaluating supply chain performance. Business Research, 2005, 2, 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lummus R R, Vokurka R J. Strategic supply chain planning. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 1998, 39, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farris P W, Bendle N T, Pfeifer P E, Reibstein D J. Marketing Metrics: The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance, Pearson Education, New Jersey, USA, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty T L, Alexander J M. Conflict Resolution: The Analytic Hierarchy Approach, Praeger Pub, New York, USA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan R S, Norton D P. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 2007, 74,75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wong W P. A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures. Benchmarking, 2008, 15, 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akkermans H, Orschot K V. Developing a balanced scorecard with system dynamics. Proceedings of 20th International System Dynamics Conference, Palermo, Italy, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng P. Study of Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Dynamic Supply Chains, PhD thesis, Hunan University, China, 2008. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dorigo M. Optimization, Learning and Natural Algorithms, PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Italy, 1992. (In Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Martens D, De Backer M, Haesen R, Vanthienen J, Snoeck M, Baesens B. Classification with ant colony optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2007, 11, 651–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Seeley T D. The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cha S H, Tappert C C. A genetic algorithm for constructing compact binary decision trees. Journal of Pattern Recognition Research, 2009, 4, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang X S. Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, 2009, 5792, 169–178.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Fukushima K. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics, 1980, 36, 193–202.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Hinton G E, Osindero S, Teh Y. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 2006, 18, 1527–1554.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Mcculloch W, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1943, 5, 115–133.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Fogel L J. Evolutionary programming in perspective: The top-down view. In Zurada J M, Marks II R J, Robinson C J, Eds., Computational Intelligence: Imitating Life, IEEE Press, Piscataway, USA, 1994, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shi Y H, Eberhart R C. Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Washington DC, USA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zandieh M, Ghomi F, Husseini M. An immune algorithm approach to hybrid flow shops scheduling with sequence- dependent setup times. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 189, 111–127.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang F M, Cao Q K, Fang Q Y. A comparative inquiry into supply chain performance appraisal based on support vector machine and neural network. 2008 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering, Long Beach, USA, 2008, 370–377.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu J M. GA and Its Application to Design of Supply Network, Master’s thesis, South China University of Technology, China, 2011. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gabbert P, Brown D E, Huntley C L, Markowicz B P, Sappington D E. A system for learning routes and schedules with genetic algorithms. The Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA’91), 1991, 430–436.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liu C. Modelling and Theoretical Design of the Optimisation of Supply Networks, PhD thesis, Changsha Central South University, China, 2006. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pawlak Z. Rough sets decision algorithms and Bays’ theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 136, 181–189.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu Y Z, Xuan H Y. ACA and its application to vehicle routine problems. Information and Control, 2004, 33, 249–252. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li J J. Study of Theory of Ecological Chain of Enterprises, PhD thesis, Jilin University, China, 2011. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sabelis M W, Odiekmann O, Jansen V A A. Metapopulation persistence despite local extinction: Predator-prey patch models of the Lotka-Volterra type. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1991, 42, 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li X F, Liu G Z. The modification and application of artificial neural network BP algorithm. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Edition), 2000, 32, 105–109. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Huang J Y, H J Z. BP network and its application in SCM performance evaluation. Shanghai Management Science, 2006, 6, 75–57. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Coulibalya P, Anctilb F, Bobee B. Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 230, 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rumelhart D E, Hinton G E, Williams R J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 1986, 323, 533–536.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Masters T. Advanced Algorithms for Neural Networks: A C++ Sourcebook, 1st, Wiley, New York, USA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hornik K M, Stinch M, White H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 1989, 2, 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shujun Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, X., Zhang, S., Wang, L. et al. An Evaluation Model of Supply Chain Performances Using 5DBSC and LMBP Neural Network Algorithm. J Bionic Eng 10, 383–395 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(13)60234-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(13)60234-6

Keywords

Navigation