Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of interstitial laser hyperthermia in a murine model of colorectal liver metastases

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Interstitial laser hyperthermia (ILH) is an in situ ablative technique used for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. At present, few data exist concerning the optimum power settings required to maximize tissue necrosis.The aim of this study was to establish the dose-response relationship between the laser power setting and the extent of tissue necrosis produced in liver and tumor tissue, as well as the pattern of necrosis in a murine model of liver metastases. An intrasplenic induction model of liver metastases in 4- to 6-week-old male inbred CBA mice was used. Laser hyperthermia was applied to liver and tumor tissue using a bare optical quartz fiber from a Laserex SLY500 Nd:YAG surgical laser generator. Two-watt and 5-watt power settings were used at specific time intervals. The livers were then excised, fixed in formalin, and the extent and degree of necrosis were measured. Results were expressed as mean ? standard deviation and were normally distributed. Analysis of variance was performed, and the least significant difference was used for post hoc tests. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Interstitial laser hyperthermia at 5 watts of power produced larger diameters of necrosis than did 2 watts for specific exposure times in normal liver tissue. However, when the total energy applied was compared, there was no significant difference in the diameters of tissue necrosis produced by the two power settings. The diameter of tissue necrosis in the normal liver increased from 2 mm at 10 joules to 8 mm at 600 joules of energy. Within tumor tissue, ILH at 2 and 5 watts produced similar diameters of necrosis for specific exposure times. When amounts of total energy applied were compared, ILH at the lower power setting (2 watts) produced a significantly larger diameter of necrosis than the higher power setting (5 watts). The diameter of necrosis achieved in tumor tissue was significantly larger than that in normal liver tissue at both power settings, for an equivalent amount of applied energy. The difference was more pronounced when ILH was performed at the lower power setting. The maximum diameter of necrosis achieved was 6.8 ± 0.7 mm in normal liver tissue and 7.7 ± 0.8 mm in tumor tissue. Charring of the fiber tip was delayed when the lower power setting was used, occurring after 20 seconds of exposure, compared to 5 seconds at the higher power setting. Similarly, cavitation occurred initially at 50 seconds at 5 watts of power and was delayed until 90 seconds of exposure at 2 watts of power. Histopathologic findings revealed an elliptical area of homogeneous necrosis, with a central acellular coagulum surrounded by intact but nonviable tissue. ILH is capable of producing highly reproducible, uniform, and complete tissue necrosis. The diameter of necrosis is related to the total energy applied. At low-power settings at any given amount of applied energy, a significantly larger diameter of tissue necrosis was achieved in tumor tissue compared to normal liver tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vogl TJ, Mack MG, Muller PK, et al.. Interventional MR: Interstitial therapy. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1479–1487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. De Sanctis JT, Goldberg SN, Mueller PR. Percutaneous treatment of hepatic neoplasms: A review of current techniques. Cardiovasc Intervent Radio1 1998;21:273–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuruppu D, Christophi C, Bertram JF, et al.. Characterization of an animal model of hepatic metastasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996;11:26–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuruppu D, Christophi C, O’Brien PE. Microvascular architecture of hepatic metastases in a mouse model. HPB Surg 1997;10:149–158.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner JS, Adson MA, van Heerden JA, et al.. The natural history of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1984;199:502–508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bengtsson G, Carlsson G, Hafstrom L, et al.. Natural history of patients with untreated liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 1981;141:586–589.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scheele J, Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al.. Indicators of prognosis after hepatic resection for colorectal secondaries. Surgery 1991;110:13–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goslin R, Steele G, Zamcheck N. Factors influencing survival in patients with hepatic metastases from adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:749–754.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cady B, Monson DO, Swinton NW. Survival of patients after colonic resection for carcinoma with simultaneous liver metastases. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;131:697–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levine AW, Donegan WL, Irwin M. Adenocarcinoma of the colon with hepatic metastases. Fifteen-year survival. JAMA 1982;247:2809–2810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gastrointestinal tumor study group. Adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer—results of a prospective randomized trial. N Engl J Med 1984;310:737–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gastrointestinal tumor study group. A controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy or combined chemoradiation therapy following curative resection for rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1465–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steele G, Ravikumar TS. Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1989;210:127–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakamura S, Suzuki S, Baba S. Resection of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma. World J Surg 1997;21:741–747.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heisterkamp J, van Hillegersberg R, Sinofsky E, et al.. Heatresistant cylindrical diffuser for interstitial laser coagulation: Comparison with the bare-tip fiber in a porcine liver model. Lasers Surg Med 1997;20:304–309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moller PH, Lindberg L, Henriksson PH, et al.. Interstitial laser thermotherapy: Comparison between bare fiber and sapphire probe. Lasers Med Sci 1995;10:193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nolsoe CP, Torp-Pedersen S, Olldag E, et al.. Bare fiber low power Nd-YAG laser interstitial hyperthermia: Comparison between diffuser tip and non-modified tip, an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci 1992;7:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matthewson K, Coleridge-Smith P, O’Sullivan JP, et al.. Biological effects of intrahepatic neodymium:yttrium-aluminumgarnet laser photocoagulation in rats. Gastroenterology 1987;93:550–557.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sweetland HM, Wyman A, Rogers K. Evaluation of the effect on the normal liver of interstitial laser hyperthermia using artificial sapphire probes. Lasers Med Sci 1993;8:99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moller PH, Ivarsson K, Stenram U, et al.. Interstitial laser thermotherapy of adenocarcinoma transplanted into rat liver. Em J Surg 1997;163:861–870.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Hillegersberg R, van Staveren HJ, Kort WJ, et al.. Interstitial Nd:YAG laser coagulation with a cylindrical diffusing fiber tip in experimental liver metastases. Lasers Surg Med 1994;14:124–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijayaragavan Muralidharan F.R.A.C.S..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muralidharan, V., Malcontenti-Wilson, C. & Christophi, C. Effect of interstitial laser hyperthermia in a murine model of colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 5, 646–657 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80108-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80108-6

Key words

Navigation