Abstract
The Loess Critical Zone (LCZ) is located in the intersection of bedrock, groundwater, pedosphere, atmosphere and biosphere. It is a key issue to understand the structural characteristics and soil carbon (C) cycle of the LCZ. We summarized the mechanisms of C exchange between rocks and the atmosphere, and discussed the mechanisms of C stabilization and persistence of the LCZ. Due to the deep layer, C stocks of the CLZ could be underestimated. In light of the recent theory of microbial C pump, soil microorganisms play an important role in C cycle, however, the microbial function is not widely considered in C cycling model of the LCZ. For future studies, it is suggested to systematically study the C cycling process from plant canopy to bedrock by the framework system of the LCZ. A variety of techniques and methods are integrated to combine short-term and high-frequency observations with long-term positioning observations, and pay attention to the response and feedback mechanisms of soil organic C (SOC) cycling to global changes and human activities, especially the migration and transformation of SOC in each circle and interface of the LCZ. We also recommend the necessity for intensive and long-term C monitoring in LCZ over broad geographic scale, to improve microbial C model for accurately evaluating terrestrial C budget and its dynamics. Altogether, this is the first review of C cycling, spanning from the land surface down to the bedrock in the LCZ, which is significant implications for biogeochemical cycling of C in surface and deep layers down to the bedrock.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The Earth Critical Zone (ECZ) is a complex integrated system encompassing various components of the Earth’s surface, such as bedrock, groundwater, pedosphere, atmosphere and biosphere [1]. It is also a natural reactor which characterized by intricate exchanges of matter and energy among these components [2]. Horizontally, the ECZ extends across different ecosystems, while vertically, it spans from the upper boundary, including the plant canopy, to the underlying soil layer, aquifer, and lithosphere [1, 3]. This region plays a crucial role in regulating the vital dynamics of the Earth’s surface, maintaining the natural ecological environment, and providing valuable societal resources [4]. Given that the advancements in technology on a global scale, the study of the ECZ has been emerged as an important and cutting-edge research direction within the field of Earth sciences in the twenty-first century [2, 5].
As the most active and dynamic region of the Earth’s surface system, the ECZ significantly influences the biogeochemical cycling of elements, the movement and migration of water and carbon (C) processes [1]. Most of researches on the ECZ primarily focused on unraveling the physical, chemical, and biological processes that control material cycling within this zone, as well as analyzing the interconnections among these processes [6, 7]. Within the dynamic core of this region, soil organic matter (SOM) serves as a key component, enabling the proper functioning of the critical zone. It acts as an essential energy and nutrient source for heterotrophic microorganisms and functions as a significant complexing agent or adsorbent for environmental pollutants [8, 9]. The decomposition and transformation of SOM play a pivotal role in various physical, chemical, and biological processes within this zone.
Loess, which covers approximately 10% of the Earth’s land area, is widely distributed worldwide (Fig. 1A). Now, research on loess has transitioned from qualitative descriptions to quantitative and interdisciplinary investigations. In China, the loess region represents around 5% of the global loess area (Fig. 1B). In the typical of this region (Loess Plateau), the vegetation coverage increased from 21 to 71% in recent 40 yrs due to the grain for green project. The mean annual temperature gradually increased from 1950s. The mean annual precipitation first decreased before 2000, and then increased after 2000 (Fig. 2). Chinese research on the structure and evolution of loess has surpassed that of European and American countries, reaching an advanced international level [10,11,12,13]. According to the new global development paradigm and China’s major national strategic goals of “high-quality development of the Yellow River” and “dual-carbon targets” the soil C sink within the Loess Critical Zone (LCZ) presents significant opportunities alongside formidable challenges. Therefore, examining the dynamic changes, trends, and controlling processes of soil organic C (SOC) within LCZ is crucial for understanding the patterns of material transport and energy transfer, thereby contributing to the sustainable development of human society.
Observed mean annual temperature (MAT) and precipitation (MAP) variations between 1950 and 2020 in the Loess Critical Zone (a). The slight orange dashed line (MAT) is fitted to the data with the slop = 0.05 (p < 0.001). The slight blue dashed line (MAP) is fitted to the data with the slop = -0.23 (before 2000) and slop = 0.24 (after 2000). Vegetation coverage from 1982 to 2020 in the Loess Critical Zone (b-e)
2 The development of the Loess Critical Zone
Since the establishment of the first three Earth’s Critical Zone (ECZ) observation stations in the United States in 2007, approximately 64 international Critical Zone observation stations have been gradually established worldwide by 2015, forming an observational network that monitors changes in environmental gradients [14]. However, studies on the ECZ in China began relatively late. In 2008, an article titled “Hydropedology: an emerging interdiscipline” was published in “Science & Technology Review” which introduced the concept of the Earth’s critical zone in a simplistic manner [6, 7]. In 2010, the “International Academic Conference on Hydropedology and Forefront Research and Applications in the Earth’s Critical Zone” took place at Beijing Normal University, promoting the development of research on the ECZ in China. In the same year, Lin [1] reviewed the concept of the Earth’s Critical Zone and published an article entitled “Earth’s Critical Zone and hydropedology: concepts, characteristics, and advances.” During the “International Workshop on Hydropedology and Sustainable Use of Natural Resources” in 2013, ECZ was considered as a significant topic. Chinese academician Congqiang Liu presented on “Processes in the Earth’s Critical Zone and biogeochemical cycles” at the forum with the theme “Frontiers in Earth Biology,” which garnered substantial attention for the public. In 2014, the “Shuangqing Forum”, organized by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, highlighted the urgent need for research on the ECZ in China and discussed its future development project. Then, it was announced that five ECZ observation stations would be officially established, including the red soil region of southern China, suburban areas in Ningbo city, the Karst region of Southwest China, and the Loess Plateau, among others. Subsequently, the other ECZ observation stations were established, such as Qinghai Lake, Jianghan Plain, North China Plain, the Circum-Bohai Sea coast, and the Yanshan mountainous area [5]. In 2015, the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council initiated a major international research project in the field of the ECZ. This project aimed to understand the sustainability of land and water resources, the dynamic processes and timescales of evolution, and the ecosystem service functions within the Karst region, Loess Plateau, red soil region of Southern China, and rapidly changing suburban areas. Based on the Chinese ecosystem research network, this project officially commenced scientific research on the typical Critical Zone.
In this case, Chinese academician Ming’an Shao proposed the word of “Loess Critical Zone” (LCZ). In fact, LCZ has only been in use for the past years. However, researches and investigations related to this concept can be traced back to studies on biogeochemistry and the C-water cycle conducted several decades ago [15,16,17,18]. In recent years, there have been extremely global climate changes and intense human activities, leading to considerable alterations in the SOC transformation and other processes of the LCZ [16, 19, 20]. Previous studies on the ecosystem C stocks of the LCZ primarily focused on C output, lacking the underlying C driven processes [19, 20]. Consequently, it is of great significance to explore the sources, transport pathways, and transformation characteristics of SOC in the LCZ.
3 Distribution of the Loess Critical Zone
Geographically, loess distributed sporadically in the arid and semi-arid mid-latitude regions of both the northern and southern hemispheres [11]. The largest area covered by loess in the world is found in Asia, followed by Europe, North America, and South America (Fig. 1A). In Europe, the loess coverage ratio is about 16.6%, while Asia accounts for 10.6%, North America for 6%, and South America for 2.6%. Loess sediments can be found at altitudes ranging up to 5,300 m above sea level in areas north of the Kunlun Mountains in China, as well as in locations such as Argentina and New Zealand [21, 22]. With the exception of moist frozen loess in northeastern Siberia and northern Alaska, loess is generally found above the water table [23]. The thickest and most continuous loess sediments are located in China, with an average thickness of 300 m and a maximum thickness reaching 505 m, and the calculated mean loess thickness is 105.7 m [22]. In Siberia and Central Asia, the thickness of loess generally ranges from 0 to 200 m [11], while in Europe and North America, it is usually less than 20 m. However, in certain regions such as downstream of the Danube, the Palouse area, Nebraska, and Alaska, the thickness can reach several dozen meters or even approximately 100 m. In South America, loess has an average thickness of 50 m, while in New Zealand, Africa, and the Arabian Peninsula, it is generally around 20 m, and in Australia, it is approximately 3 m.
The LCZ exhibits a wide distribution in China and encompasses the interaction of five spheres: rock, water, soil, atmosphere, and biota [13]. The horizontal boundaries primarily correspond to the loess region. Through in-depth studies and improved understanding of the LCZ, significant progress has been made in its classification, making it an important tool for managing natural resources within the Earth’s surface system [16, 24,25,26]. Among the major regions of the LCZ, the Loess Plateau represents a typical and distinctive critical zone, and stands out as an area with the most fully developed loess deposits globally, preserving comprehensive records of the age and climatic information of the LCZ [22, 27]. A recent study has established an index system and methodological framework for the regional classification of the LCZ, and the entire Loess Plateau has been classified into eight Critical Zone (Fig. 1C) [13]. Within the national strategies such as the “high-quality development of the Yellow River” and “dual-carbon targets”, the soil C stock of the CLZ will encounter significant opportunities and challenges [24, 25]. Soil organic C plays a vital role in maintaining the proper functioning of the LCZ, and all interfaces within the zone are active sites for the substantial decomposition and transformation of SOC (Fig. 3). Currently, a preliminary network of observation stations has been established in the Loess Plateau, leading to research advancements in the structure, processes, evolution, and simulation of the LCZ [5, 23,24,25, 28]. However, due to vegetation greening project and extremely climate change, the structure and soil C cycling processes within the LCZ are undergoing significant changes compared to other areas. Therefore, gaining a correct understanding of the structure of the LCZ and the SOC cycling is crucial for achieving ecological goals and sustainable development in the Loess Plateau.
4 The stock and dynamic of SOC in the Loess Critical Zone
Soil organic C (SOC) in the LCZ experiences significant decomposition, transformation, and migration across various media (atmosphere, vegetation, soil, and rocks) [26, 29, 30] (Fig. 3). In the atmosphere, it exists in the form of inorganic C, while in terrestrial ecosystems, SOC stock is the most abundant. The estimated values for SOC stocks in the atmosphere, terrestrial vegetation, and oceans proposed by different researchers are approximately consistent [31,32,33]. However, there are considerable discrepancies in the estimated values of SOC [15, 17]. These differences primarily arise from variations in data, research methods, sampling techniques, and the considerable spatial variability of soil [15, 26]. In the LCZ, the SOC stock is immense and the C cycling processes are complex. Furthermore, the combined impacts of climate changes and human activities subject the SOC stock to dynamic changes. Additionally, due to the vast area of the Loess Plateau, data collection becomes challenging, and differences in sampling technologies and processes further contribute to the uncertainty in estimating SOC stocks [29, 30]. These uncertainties significantly affect SOC stock estimation in evaluating the total C budget in China.
Loess Plateau are the significant C sink in the Earth. To provide a complete picture of the C sequestration in the Loess Plateau, we documented C pools and the changes for all C sectors (aboveground biomass, ecosystem C, and SOC) in the Loess Plateau (Table 1), by synthesizing the studies in the special feature and other recent studies [26, 29, 30]. Former estimates for C stocks of the Loess Plateau changed substantially because of diversity in data sources and inconsistency in methodologies [31,32,33]. These studies have shown that the SOC density in the topsoil ranges from 0.66 to 12.18 kg·m–2 within the 0–20 cm depth, with most values falling between 1 and 4 kg·m–2 [34]. Li et al. [7] pointed out that the total C stock of the Loess Plateau is approximately 2.29 Pg, and the C stocks of farmland, grassland, shrubland and forest are nearly 0.98, 1.09 and 0.21 Pg. In our previous study, the total C stock in these four ecosystems (forest, shrubland, grassland, and cropland) was 2.84 Pg C, among which 29.63% was stored in soil (0–20 cm), 53.23% in aboveground biomass, and 17.14% in belowground biomass [26]. The 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil layers on the Loess Plateau, covering almost 6.5% territory in China, held around 5% total SOC stocks at the mentioned layers across the country [34,35,36,37]. Furthermore, the C stock in grassland and farmland soils were higher than belowground biomass, which is similar to the estimates for the continental China (3.9 g/m2) [38], United States (3.0 g/m2) [39] and Europe (3.5 g/m2) [40]. However, higher SOC stock does not necessarily lead to greater ecosystem C stock. Fox example, the C stocks in the soil of forestland and shrubland were lower than the biomass due to the “Grain-for-Green” project in China, which had built numerous forestland and shrubland regions [7, 26].
In addition, the area-weighted mean biomass C densities in forestland (72.1 Mg ha−1), and grassland (1.02 Mg ha−1) across the Loess Plateau (Fig. 4) were substantially lower than the global means [94.2 Mg ha−1 in forestland and 7.2 Mg ha−1 in grassland] [38, 51]. Large-area young forests, extensive grazing and soil water limitation are the possible contributors of low biomass C density of the Loess Plateau [24, 25]. Specifically, almost 90% forests are aged below 60 years, and corresponding biomass is below 60 Mg ha−1, obviously lower compared with that (104.7 ± 30.3 Mg ha−1) in old forests (≥ 100 years) and the average value across China’s forests [52]. The higher proportion of young and middle-aged forests of the Loess Plateau suggests enormous future potential of C sinks [25]. Future biomass C density may surmount our estimates after forest areal expansion, vegetation restoration and protection and soil C increasing needs to be examined [53]. Vegetation restoration measures, ecological improvement projects, as well as natural conservation policies also may enable C gains to continually increase in this region [54].
In terms of vertical distribution (Fig. 4), the soil layer in the LCZ is thick, and there are notable variations in the distribution of SOC stock, with significant differences in SOC content across different soil layers [36, 55]. Previous studies on SOC stock and influencing factors in the LCZ have primarily focused on the shallow layer within 0–1 m, while the C stock in deep soil layer is enormous [11, 56] (Table 1). Generally, the content of SOC decreases with soil depth, with the SOC content in the shallow layer (0–10 cm) being 4–10 times higher than that in the deep layer (80–100 cm) [57]. The SOC stock in 0–20 cm, 0–50 cm, and 0–100 cm are estimated to be 1.68 Pg, 3.47 Pg, and 5.32 Pg, respectively. The SOC stock in the 0–20 cm and 0–50 cm layers accounts for 32.0% and 65.0% of the 0–100 cm layer, respectively. This is primarily due to the generation, transformation, and decomposition of aboveground vegetation biomass, as well as the predominance of roots in the surface layer [55]. Consequently, the contribution rate of SOC stock in the 0–50 cm soil layer is as high as two-thirds. The SOC stock is relatively low in boggy soil, gray desert soil, and solonetz, while loessal soil and gray cinnamonic soil, which have a relatively large area, are the main regions with SOC distribution [26]. Other study suggests that the SOC stock in the shallow layer (0–20 cm) of the Loess Plateau is 1.64 Pg, which increases to 2.86 Pg in the 0–40 cm soil layer. In the deep soil layer (0–100 cm), the SOC stock is estimated to be 4.78 Pg, and it reaches 5.85 Pg in the 0–200 cm soil layer. The SOC stock in the 0–100 cm and 0–200 cm layers accounts for 8.21% and 5.32% of the total SOC stock in China, respectively [58].
5 The microbial turnover of SOC in the Loess Critical Zone
Soil microorganisms act as the engine of biogeochemical processes in the LCZ, serving as important links between the input and output of soil C [59, 60]. They mediated crucial metabolic processes of C cycling, driving the exchange and transfer of active matter among various interfaces in the critical zone, such as the conversion of CO2 to organic compounds, the production and oxidation of CH4, and the decomposition of organic matter [61]. In alkaline loess soils characterized by high heterogeneity and calcium richness, the coupling mechanism among C in plant residue, C in microbial residue, and microorganisms requires further investigation.
Soil microorganisms determine the transport of SOC to the underground, the absorption and transport of nutrients by plants, and the micro-channels for nutrient transfer in underground ecosystems [9, 62,63,64,65]. Here, Fig. 5 illustrated the migration and cycling process of SOC in the LCZ under natural conditions. Through photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2 was fixed by plants, synthesizing organic C for themselves, and a portion of this organic C is transferred to the litter pool [66]. Microorganisms decompose a portion of the litter, while the undecomposed residues, animal excrement, microbial residues, decomposition products, and synthesis products collectively become the main source of SOC [67]. In addition, dissolved organic C, particulate organic C formed through percolation in the soil profile, and C input from plant roots contribute to the formation of deep SOC. During the transfer of SOC between these pools, degradation processes such as respiration and mineralization can occur. Some degradation products are released back into the atmosphere as CO2 or CH4, forming the component of soil C cycling [21].
The LCZ has a large number of soil microorganisms because of the deep layer [68, 69], and these microorganisms play a crucial role in various physical, chemical, and biological processes and contribute to the formation of SOC. When new C is exposed to rainfall, it undergoes eluviation and is subsequently transported by the ‘soil microbial C pump’ [70]. The residues of living microorganisms continuously accumulate, forming a residual C pool. For example, fungi can extend their hyphae to the surface, transferring absorbed C to the deep soil and contributing to the accumulation of SOC [68, 69]. The microbial residues left behind by deceased microorganisms also contribute to the stable SOC stock [71,72,73]. As the loess accumulates and C is eluviated, the activity and function of most microorganisms in the deep soil significantly decrease [74]. Through the cycling of energy and substances by the “soil microbial C pump,” generations of microorganisms store SOC in their biomass, which is later transferred to their residues and contributes to the accumulation of substantial SOC [26, 59, 75]. For example, Ren et al. [67] utilized metagenomic sequencing technology to study the trends of carbon-hydrolyzing enzymes produced by soil microorganisms and their response to the decomposition of microbial residues from different sources in the Robinia pseudoacacia restoration sequence in the Loess Plateau over the past 45 years. In the latest study, it was found that the recovery of natural grassland in the Loess Plateau is attributed to microbial residues (mainly from bacteria) that increase SOC storage, influenced by environmental factors and plant C inputs [76].
6 Mechanisms of SOC stabilization in the Loess Critical Zone
6.1 Physical and chemical protection of aggregates
At present, it is generally accepted that the debris of plants and microorganisms forms the core of micro-aggregates, the new organic substances with high C form stable macro-aggregates [77,78,79], while the old organic C are trapped in fine aggregates, the protected and unprotected organic C in the aggregates have different regeneration rates [80]. By this way, the agglomerate protection volume or capacity is the physical basis for the natural potential of soil C sequestration. The soil aggregates are formed by binding the organic–inorganic composites or free-particle organic C through aggregate structure [77]. When the aggregates are formed, the internal pores of the aggregates are reduced, and the mineral particles are cemented tightly with the organic C, thus forming SOC [60] (Fig. 6). For example, the reduction of porosity of large aggregates directly impedes the entry of air and moisture, thereby reducing the decomposition of organic C in large aggregates [78]. The pores in the micro-aggregates are extremely small, and if the micro-aggregates are smaller than the limits that the bacteria can pass, the organic C can only be degraded by the extracellular enzyme inward diffusion, which is a great energy-consuming process for the micro-organisms, thus reducing SOC decomposition [80, 81]. The degree of SOC decomposition in aggregates is not uniform due to the different strengths of different grades of aggregates and different cementitious materials [82]. Studies have pointed out that water-stable aggregates with a diameter greater than 0.250 mm contain more particulate organic C (POC), lighter-group organic C (LFOC), and higher microbial biomass C (MBC) [83]. This indicates that the large aggregates have low organic C stability [84]. Based on the study of loess soil, it is also shown that the oxidizable organic C in loess soils mainly concentrate in the 0.2–2 mm large aggregates particle group, while the stable aromatic organic C concentrate in the particle groups smaller than 0.002 mm [83]. Previous study also showed that roots and mycelium can directly promote the formation of large aggregates, and micro-aggregates can form in large aggregates [77]. Then, Henson et al. [83] further emphasized that the large aggregate-wrapped particulate organic matter creates the conditions for the formation of micro-aggregates, while the particulate organic matter encapsulated by the micro-aggregates is more physically protected, which has important effects on the stability of SOC [84, 85]. Therefore, large aggregates are the guarantee for the long-term storage of SOC [86, 87].
In addition, the cohesive particles in soil aggregates have a large specific surface area and surface charge, with a strong adsorption capacity for SOC [88,89,90]. In fact, SOC aggregates mainly composed of amorphous minerals such as allophane, ferrihydrite, and imogolite, with inorganic binders amorphous iron oxides and calcium magnesium carbonates and organic C substitution or formation of ionic bonds to form organic–inorganic complexes [91,92,93,94]. On the Loess Plateau, the rare earth element concentrations of different phases vary in the loess-paleosol layers and are most enriched in the easily reducible phase (except for the residual phase), which is likely explained by the association of are earth element with Mn-oxides [88]. Most parts of the Loess Plateau belong to the parent material of loess which has a strong surface adsorption capacity, it is more likely to adsorb hydrophobic organic C with poor degradability, and the clay particles occupy most of them [23]. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand that the content of clay is usually positively correlated with the content of SOC [95], and the stabilizing effect of loess to SOC has been widely validated both indoors and field [20, 96,97,98]. In fact, the specific surface area of the soil and cation exchange capacity determine the ability of SOC sequestration [35, 99,100,101]. More of studies reported that amorphous calcium oxides are the decisive factor in promoting SOC sequestration on the Loess Plateau [20, 35]. Therefore, soils rich in amorphous calcium oxides on the Loess Plateau may be the dominant mechanism for the stabilization of SOC.
6.2 Microbiological metabolic protection
Soil organic C mineralization is carried out by the soil microorganisms, and overwhelmingly by the catabolic activity of the microbial community [102]. Consequently, the mechanisms of microbial metabolism are ultimately responsible for SOC stabilization [103]. There have been several descriptions of SOC stabilization mechanisms. Here we rearrange previous concepts under three main types of SOC stabilization mechanisms: microbial physiological inhibition; microbial metabolic limitation, and microbial access constraint [104, 105]. We define physiological inhibition as conditions inducing overall microbial inactivity or dormancy; metabolic limitation as conditions modulating microbial catabolism, including C use efficiency (CUE) [100]; while access constraint refers to the physical barriers for microorganisms or their exoenzymes to reach and metabolize a SOC substrate (Fig. 7). Microbial physiological inhibition and metabolic limitation can be considered as spanning a continuum, in which when conditions that determine inhibition pass a threshold allowing microorganisms to break dormancy and become active [101], the rate of SOC mineralization will become controlled by the factor(s) limiting microbial activity [106]. On the other hand, if SOC is protected from microbial access by spatial impediments, it will be less sensitive to microbial metabolic limitations [107, 108]. Microbial physiological inhibition and access constraint are responsible for SOC persistent on the long term (century to millennia), while microbial metabolic limitation controls short-term SOC persistence (years to decades) in the Loess Critical Zone.
Schematic representation of the mechanisms of stabilization of SOC in the Loess Critical Zone. Microbial physiological inhibition (MPI) is caused by freezing temperatures or lack of oxygen, and results in extremely low microbial processing of plant inputs, which thus accumulate largely as particulate organic C (POC) and can persist for millennia, forming C-rich organic soils characterized by low C:N ratios. MPI transitions to microbial metabolic limitation (MML) when conditions still limit but do not entirely inhibit microbial activity. Thus, MML is controlled by the availability of energy, nutrients, and moisture to microorganisms. High levels of MML result in higher accumulation of soil organic matter (SOC) in POC, higher soil C:N, relatively low SOC persistence, and high SOC vulnerability to changes that may release MML. Microbial access constraints (MAC) limit the access of microorganisms and their enzymes to SOC. Since organo-mineral associations and protection within small pores are the main spatial constraints on microbial access to SOC, MAC is controlled by the soil mineral capacity to form strong organo-mineral bonds (i.e., Al, Fe, Ca, and available reactive surface area), and by pore space and moisture. Most of the SOC protected by MAC is in MAOC, which may persist in soils for up to millennia and is generally less vulnerable to environmental changes. In soils with lower overall SOC stocks, where available SOC is likely have undergone microbial processing, MAC is the prevailing mechanism of SOC persistence
7 Controls of SOC persistence in the Loess Critical Zone
7.1 Climate change
Here, we proposed the simply framework to overcome this knowledge gap and provide a hierarchical structure to test the effect of different factors on SOC persistence (Fig. 8). We propose climate change and human activity to be the overarching control on SOC persistence when it imposes either a physiological inhibition (freezing temperature, anoxic conditions, severe drought), or a large metabolic limitation (low/very high temperature and moisture) on microbial activity [109, 110].
Conceptual representation of SOC persistence framework in the Loess Critical Zone. Arrows in top and bottom panel are color-coded according to potential controls. We hypothesize (right panel) that C input limits soil C cycling when plant photosynthesis is constrained relatively more than microbial activities. In these ecosystems, microorganisms process the small available plant C inputs, resulting in low soil C stocks with relatively high mineral-associated organic C (MAOC) accumulation controlled by the availability of soil minerals for stabilization of microbial products. C input-limited ecosystems are expected to have decoupled C cycling. We also hypothesize (left panel) C output limitation to control soil C cycling in systems where microorganisms are more inhibited than plants. C-output limited systems would be characterized by higher POC relative to MAOC. Further, we hypothesize (central panel) that balanced plant C inputs vs microbial C outputs will result in soils having more equal shares of POC and MAOC. Further, we expect climate changes and human activities to be the main driver of C input- and C output-limited systems, while ecosystem traits emerging from the interaction of plant, microbial, and soil traits to be significant drivers of soil C dynamics in ecosystems with more balanced inputs and outputs. Finally, we hypothesize (bottom panel) that subsoil are input-limited and their SOC dynamics are largely controlled by soil traits, including mineral properties
Climate regimes also affect microbial access to resources, thus controlling SOC persistence by modulating the microbial access constraint mechanism. For example, areas with higher precipitation and humid soils are associated with higher SOC storage, likely because of the increased plant productivity and inputs, but possibly also because higher precipitation promotes dissolved organic C (DOC) leaching and mineral-associated organic C (MAOC) formation [111]. Warming increases the soil temperature and microbial activity and therefore stimulates SOC transformations. Typically POC is most vulnerable to the temperature because it’s largely unprotected, and the temperature controls microbial energy limitation, which is the primary mechanism of POC stabilization. Accelerated POC losses with warming may result in increased MAOC formation [112], as more microbial products are formed from POC decomposition which can associate to minerals. In addition, atmospheric precipitation-induced surface runoff can cause soil erosion, resulting in soil eroded C [29]. During the migration process, eroded C may undergo selective degradation, sedimentation, and other biogeochemical and physical processes, ultimately leading to the formation of stable SOC by burial effect.
7.2 Biotic and abiotic factors
We now understand that the persistence of SOC is also driven by a complexity of biotic and abiotic factors [107, 108]. Variations in physicochemical and biological properties are evident across different soil layers [26]. In terms of chemical weathering, plant roots play a significant role, while mycorrhizal fungi release nutrients through organic acid dissolution, making them accessible for uptake and utilization by organisms [113]. The chemical composition of deep soil has a considerable impact on plant biomass and ecosystem self-evolution. Factors such as microbial biomass, extracellular enzymes, substrate quality and quantity, and environmental conditions can influence the mineralization rate of organic materials from various sources [9, 114, 115]. Factors such as vegetation primary productivity, litter production and decomposition rates directly impact the content and turnover rate of SOC, thereby affecting soil C migration, transformation, and sedimentation in the critical zone [114, 115]. Given that climate is a soil forming factor in interactions with parent material, topography, time, vegetation and other biotic factors [116], in the long term it affects SOC persistence in all soils. Additionally, climate controls long-term mineral weathering, and thus the interactions between geochemistry and climate need to be taken into account when studying SOC dynamics and storage [103, 117]. This interaction, in fact, determines mineral reactivity, thus controlling nutrient availability and microbial community composition and metabolism, and modulating the energy and nutrient availability and pathways ultimately responsible for SOC persistence [103].
8 Soil C cycling model in the Loess Critical Zone
Recently, most of studies develop C budget models for terrestrial ecosystems and investigate the mechanisms underlying the dynamics of SOC by the indoor and field experiments [19, 58]. However, the complex interactions among C pools and the scarcity of long-term, site-specific data limit the measurements of SOC. Consequently, the mutual interaction mechanisms among the various SOC pools in the LCZ are not yet fully elucidated. The contribution of soil microbial residues to SOC may have been significantly underestimated [89]. Most of terrestrial ecosystem models in domestic and international research have overlooked or rarely considered microbial effects [118,119,120,121]. However, the development of microbial models provides an opportunity to integrate them with ecosystem models [122,123,124]. Recent advancements have explicitly incorporated the role of microorganisms as decomposers in simulating SOC decomposition [88, 98]. These models separate microbial biomass C from extracellular enzymes and analyze their independence, integrating enzyme-driven dynamics of SOC [88].
The microbial residues play a direct role in contributing to the stable C pool in the soil [93]. Traditional models for SOC decomposition often utilize first-order decay kinetics equations, neglecting the role of microorganisms [93, 98]. However, in recent years, several models have employed Michaelis–Menten equations to describe SOC decomposition, such as CON (Conventional Model), GER (German), and MEND (Microbial Enzyme-mediated Decomposition). These models consider the microbial biomass C pool and have shown better performance compared to first-order kinetics models [88, 93]. The formation of stable soil C pools through microbial metabolites and residues is critical in SOC decomposition process [93]. Nevertheless, these models do not treat the microbial residue C pool as a separate entity. Recently developed SOC-microbial decomposition models provide a solid theoretical foundation and can be applied to the C cycling model in the Loess Plateau [7, 29, 95]. For example, increase microbial residue C pool to the first-order kinetics model and Michaelis–Menten model (Fig. 9). Fan et al. [74] established two models named Michaelis–Menten Necromass Decomposition (MIND) and First-order Necromass Decomposition (FOND), to simulate the microbial residue C pool. These models were validated using a 13C decomposition experiment, demonstrating their accuracy and effectiveness. The Michaelis–Menten model exhibited superior precision compared to the first-order kinetics model. Based on these findings, it was estimated that the microbial residue C pool accounts for 10%-27% of the total organic C in various global ecosystems [8, 98]. Further, soil microbial residues are 40 times greater than the living microbial biomass, and they contribute 25%-40% to the SOC pool [8]. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate the microbial residue C pool into the SOC model of the Loess Plateau. This integration can improve the simulation accuracy of SOC and reduce the uncertainties associated with C stock estimation. Furthermore, by comparing with global SOC databases, it is possible to enhance the model’s predictive capabilities effectively.
Model of C pools model of SOC cycling in the Loess Critical Zone (including microbial biomass poll and residue C pool). Note: There are two pathways through which soil organic carbon is formed from plant litter. The first pathway involves the direct sedimentation and coagulation of litter C modified by microbial extracellular enzymes into the soil. The second pathway is an indirect transformation where litter carbon is first assimilated by soil microorganisms and then synthesized into microbial biomass C. When these microorganisms die, their residues accumulate in the soil, contributing to the organic carbon pool. The direction and magnitude of these processes are influenced by environmental factors, as indicated by the valve symbols on each arrow. The blue solid line represents the Michaelis–Menten kinetics, which regulates the size and dynamics of the microbial biomass C pool. The red solid line arrow represents the pathway when.13C-labeled C in microbial residues is introduced into the system (adapted from [74])
9 Perspective
9.1 Exploring soil C cycling at the long- and short scale
The soil C cycling in the LCZ encompasses both short-term and long-term biogeochemical processes. To gain a better understanding of these processes, it is crucial to investigate the short-term scale changes in C cycling within the LCZ. It is recommended to establish a high-resolution online monitoring system and a comprehensive database for typical subsystems in the LCZ. This can be achieved through surface observations, remote sensing techniques, geographic information technology, and advanced automatic monitoring instruments. By this way, we can analyze the diurnal and seasonal patterns of C transport and investigate their responses to rainfall, climate variations, and human activities. In addition, it is important to incorporate big data geoscience and global C emission pathways, along with other contemporary factors. Developing a unified spatiotemporal observation and statistical approach will facilitate the study of SOC stock and its dynamics in the LCZ.
9.2 Binding the multi-process of C and hydrologic process
The SOC cycling in the LCZ is intricately linked to hydrological processes and nutrient cycling. However, due to their complex interactions and interdependencies, accurately quantifying the contributions of these processes to the C cycling remains challenging. In order to address this knowledge gap, it is crucial to conduct comprehensive research in typical small watersheds within the LCZ. Future study should focus on soil C flux, turnover, average retention time, and exchange rates among different C pools under different hydrological conditions, climates, and human activities. Such studies will help elucidate the mechanisms and characteristics of changes in SOC, nutrient components, and hydrological processes, as well as their primary influencing factors. Furthermore, it is important to enhance our understanding of the impacts of human activities on SOC migration and transformation by conducting investigations on the identification and tracing of C caused by human activities in the LCZ.
9.3 Paying attention to the roles of microorganisms in C cycling
Advancements in technology, such as third-generation sequencing techniques, stable isotopic tracer methods, DNA-stable isotope probes, and high-throughput sequencing, provide the opportunities to investigate the mechanisms by which microorganisms decompose SOC pool and drive its transformation. In addition, metagenomics can provide valuable information on the structure and function of soil microbial communities, enabling the determination of species types, metabolic functions, and their association with C cycling processes. In our future study, it is necessary to employ a comprehensive approach using techniques from molecular biology, isotopic tracing, and earth system science, with a focus on microbiology and soil C cycling models. This interdisciplinary approach will enhance our understanding of the biogeochemical processes involved in soil C cycling and facilitate the evaluation of C sequestration potential in the LCZ, ultimately aiding in achieving C-related targets.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- LCZ:
-
Loess Critical Zone
- ECZ:
-
Earth Critical Zone
- C:
-
Carbon
- SOC:
-
Soil organic C
- SOM:
-
Soil organic matter
- POC:
-
Particulate organic C
- LFOC:
-
Lighter-group organic C
- MBC:
-
Microbial biomass C
- DOC:
-
Dissolved organic C
- CUE:
-
C use efficiency
- CON:
-
Conventional Model
- GER:
-
German
- MEND:
-
Microbial Enzyme-mediated Decomposition
- MIND:
-
Michaelis-Menten necromass Decomposition
- FOND:
-
First -order Necromass Decomposition
References
Lin H (2010) Earth’s Critical Zone and hydropedology: concepts, characteristics, and advances. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 14:25–45. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-6-3417-2009
Richter DD, Mobley ML (2009) Monitoring Earth’s critical zone. Science 326:1067–1068. https://doi.org/10.1126/science1179117
Brantley SL, McDowell WH, Dietrich WE, White TS, Kumar P, Anderson SP et al (2017) Designing a network of critical zone observatories to explore the living skin of the terrestrial Earth. Earth Surf Dynam 5:841–860. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-841-2017
Richter DD, Billings SA (2015) ‘One physical system’: Tansley’s ecosystem as Earth’s critical zone. New Phytol 206:900–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph13338
Lv Y, Li T, Zhang K, Fu B (2017) Fledging critical zone science for environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 51:8209–8211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsest7b02677
Hu GR, Li XY, Yang XF (2020) The impact of micro-topography on the interplay of critical zone architecture and hydrological processes at the hillslope scale: Integrated geophysical and hydrological experiments on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J Hydrol 583:124618. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjhydrol2020124618
Li X, Cheng G, Fu B, Xia J, Zhang L, Yang D et al (2022) Linking critical zone with watershed science: the example of the Heihe River basin. Earths Future 10:e2022EF002966. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002966
Wang B, An S, Liang C, Liu Y, Kuzyakov Y (2021) Microbial necromass as the source of soil organic carbon in global ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 162:108422. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsoilbio2021108422
Wen S, Chen J, Yang Z, Deng L, Feng J, Zhang W et al (2023) Climatic seasonality challenges the stability of microbial-driven deep soil carbon accumulation across China. Global Change Biol 29:4430–4439. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb16760
An ZS, Wu GX, Li JP, Sun YB, Liu YM, Zhou WJ et al (2015) Global monsoon dynamics and climate change. Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc 43:29–77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-054623
Li Y, Shi W, Aydin A, Beroya-Eitner MA, Gao G (2020) Loess genesis and worldwide distribution. Earth-Sci Rev 201:102947. https://doi.org/10.1016/jearscirev2019102947
Liu TS (1965) The Deposition of Loess in China Science Press, Beijing (In Chinese)
Lv Y, Hu J, Fu B, Harris P, Wu L, Tong X et al (2019) A framework for the regional critical zone classification: the case of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Natl Sci Rev 6:14–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwy147
Tylianakis JM, Morris RJ (2017) Ecological networks across environmental gradients. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 48:25–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022821
Wang Y, Han X, Jin Z, Zhang C, Fang L (2016) Soil organic carbon stocks in deep soils at a watershed scale on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Soil Sci Soc Am J 80:157–167. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015060220
Huang L, Shao M (2019) Advances and perspectives on soil water research in China’s Loess Plateau. Earth-Sci Rev 199:102962. https://doi.org/10.1016/jearscirev2019102962
Jia X, Zhu Y, Huang L, Wei X, Fang Y, Wu L et al (2018) Mineral N stock and nitrate accumulation in the 50 to 200 m profile on the Loess Plateau. Sci Total Environ 633:999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjhydrol2020124618
Zhu Y, Jia X, Shao M (2018) Loess thickness variations across the Loess Plateau of China. Surv Geophys 39:715–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9462-6
Piao S, He Y, Wang X, Chen F (2022) Estimation of China’s terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink: Methods, progress and prospects. Sci China Earth Sci 65:641–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-021-9892-6
Yu H, Zha T, Zhang X, Ma L (2019) Vertical distribution and influencing factors of soil organic carbon in the Loess Plateau China. Sci Total Environ 693:133632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133632
Lehmann J, Kleber M (2015) The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069
An ZS, Kukla GJ, Porter SC, Xiao J (1991) Magnetic susceptibility evidence of monsoon variation on the Loess Plateau of central China during the last 130,000 years. Quaternary Res 36:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(91)90015-W
Sun Y, McManus JF, Clemens SC, Zhang X, Vogel H, Hodell DA et al (2021) Persistent orbital influence on millennial climate variability through the Pleistocene. Nat Geosci 14:812–818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00794-1
Feng X, Fu B, Piao S, Wang S, Ciais P, Zeng Z et al (2016) Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nat Clim Change 6:1019–1022. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3092
Fu B, Wang S, Liu Y, Liu J, Liang W, Miao C (2017) Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the Loess Plateau of China. Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc 45:223–243. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020552
Yang Y, Liu L, Zhang P, Wu F, Wang Y, Xu C et al (2023) Large-scale ecosystem carbon stocks and their driving factors across Loess Plateau. Carbon Neutrality 2:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-023-00044-w
Sun Y, Clemens SC, An Z, Yu Z (2006) Astronomical timescale and palaeoclimatic implication of stacked 36-Myr monsoon records from the Chinese Loess Plateau. Quaternary Sci Rev 25:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/jquascirev200507005
Wu X, Wei Y, Fu B, Wang S, Zhao Y, Moran EF (2020) Evolution and effects of the social-ecological system over a millennium in China’s Loess Plateau. Sci Adv 6:eabc0276. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadvabc0276
Deng L, Shangguan ZP, Wu GL, Chang XF (2017) Effects of Grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration in China’s grassland. Earth-Sci Rev 173:84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/jearscirev201708008
Zhang C, Liu G, Xue S, Sun C (2013) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen storage as affected by land use in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. Eur J Soil Biol 54:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/jejsobi201210007
Piao S, Fang J, Ciais P, Peylin P, Huang Y, Sitch S et al (2009) The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 458:1009–1013. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07944
Fang J, Yu G, Liu L, Hu S, Chapin FS III (2018) Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China. PNAS 115:4015–4020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas1700304115
Wang Y, Wang X, Wang K, Chevallier F, Zhu D, Lian J et al (2022) The size of the land carbon sink in China. Nature 603:E7–E9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04255-y
Xu XL, Zhang KL, Xu XL, Peng WY (2003) Estimation and distribution of soil organic carbon in Loess Plateau. J Soil Water Conserv 17:13–15. https://doi.org/10.13870/jcnkistbcxb200303004
Liu Z, Shao MA, Wang Y (2011) Effect of environmental factors on regional soil organic carbon stocks across the Loess Plateau region, China. Agr Ecosyst Environ 142:184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.002
Fu DL, Liu MY, Liu L, Zhang K, Zuo JX (2014) Organic carbon density and storage in different soils on the Loess Plateau. J Arid Zone Res 31:44–50. https://doi.org/10.13866/j.azr.2014.01.006
Li MY, Shangguan ZP, Deng L (2021) Spatial distribution of carbon storage in the terrestrial ecosystems and its influencing factors on the loess plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica 41:6786–6799
Tang X, Zhao X, Bai Y, Tang Z, Wang W, Zhao Y et al (2018) Carbon pools in China’s terrestrial ecosystems: new estimates based on an intensive field survey. PNAS 115:4021–4026. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700291115
Chambers A, Lal R, Paustian K (2016) Soil carbon sequestration potential of US croplands and grasslands: implementing the 4 per Thousand Initiative. J Soil Water Conserv 71:68A–74A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.3.68A
Smith JO, Smith P, Wattenbach M, Zaehle S, Hiederer R, Jones RJ et al (2005) Projected changes in mineral soil carbon of European croplands and grasslands, 1990–2080. Glob Change Biol 11:2141–2152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001075.x
Liu G, Zhao Z (2018) Analysis of carbon storage and its contributing factors—A case study in the Loess Plateau (China). Energies 11(6):1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061596
Xu X, Zhang K, Xu X, Peng W (2003) Spatial distribution and estimating of soil organic carbon on Loess Plateau. J Soil Water Conserv 17(3):13–15. https://doi.org/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2003.03.004
Ji J, Huang M, Li K (2008) Prediction of carbon exchanges between China terrestrial ecosystem and atmosphere in 21st century. Sci China SER D 51(6):885-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0039-y
Li K, Wang S, Cao M (2004) Vegetation and soil carbon storage in China. Sci China Earth Sci 47(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1360/02yd0029
Xie XL, Sun B, Zhou HZ, Li A (2004) Soil organic carbon storage in China. Pedosphere 14(4):491-500
Ni J (2013) Carbon storage in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems: approaching a more accurate estimate. Climatic Change 119(3-4):905–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0767-7
Pan PG (2008) Soil organic carbon stock, dynamics and climate change mitigation of China. Adv Clim Chang Res 4(5):282–289
Wang S, Tian H, Liu J, Pan S (2003) Pattern and change of soil organic carbon storage in China: 1960s–1980s. Tellus B 55(2):416–427. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v55i2.16715
Peng C, Apps MJ (1997) Contribution of China to the global carbon cycle since the last glacial maximum: Reconstruction from palaeovegetation maps and an empirical biosphere model. Tellus B 49(4):393–408. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.49.issue4.5.x
Fang JY, Liu GH, Xu SL (1996) Carbon pool of terrestrial ecosystems in China. In: Wang, G.C., and Wen, Y.P., eds. Greenhouse Gas Concentration and Emission Monitoring and Related Processes (in Chinese). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. 109–128
He N, Wen D, Zhu J, Tang X, Xu L, Zhang L et al (2017) Vegetation carbon sequestration in Chinese forests from 2010 to 2050. Glob Change Biol 23:1575–1584. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13479
Yang Y, Li P, Ding J, Zhao X, Ma W, Ji C et al (2014) Increased topsoil carbon stock across China’s forests. Glob Change Biol 20:2687–2696. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12536
Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Phillips OL, Jackson RB (2013) The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world’s forests. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 44:593–622. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135914
Tong X, Brandt M, Yue Y, Horion S, Wang K, Keersmaecker WD et al (2018) Increased vegetation growth and carbon stock in China karst via ecological engineering. Nat Sustain 1:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0004-x
Feng X, Fu B, Lu N, Zeng Y, Wu B (2013) How ecological restoration alters ecosystem services: an analysis of carbon sequestration in China’s Loess Plateau. Sci Rep 3:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02846
Chaopricha NT, Marín-Spiotta E (2014) Soil burial contributes to deep soil organic carbon storage. Soil Biol Biochem 69:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsoilbio201311011
Liu ZP, Shao MA, Wang YQ (2012) Large-scale spatial variability and distribution of soil organic carbon across the entire Loess Plateau, China. Soil Res 50(2):114–124. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR11183
Yang Y, Shi Y, Sun W, Chang J, Zhu J, Chen L et al (2022) Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality. Sci China Life Sci 65:861–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-021-2045-5
Liang C, Schimel JP, Jastrow JD (2017) The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nat Microbiol 2:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol2017105
Zhu X, Zhang Z, Wang Q, Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Lambers H et al (2022) More soil organic carbon is sequestered through the mycelium pathway than through the root pathway under nitrogen enrichment in an alpine forest. Global Change Biol 28:4947–4961. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb16263
Hoehler TM, Jørgensen BB (2013) Microbial life under extreme energy limitation. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2939
Mayer M, Krause HM, Fliessbach A, Mäder P, Steffens M (2022) Fertilizer quality and labile soil organic matter fractions are vital for organic carbon sequestration in temperate arable soils within a long-term trial in Switzerland. Geoderma 426:116080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116080
Zhao Y, Xiang W, Ma M, Zhang X, Bao Z, Xie S et al (2019) The role of laccase in stabilization of soil organic matter by iron in various plant-DOC inated peatlands: degradation or sequestration? Plant Soil 443:575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04245-0
Del Galdo I, Six J, Peressotti A, Francesca Cotrufo M (2003) Assessing the impact of land-use change on soil C sequestration in agricultural soils by means of organic matter fractionation and stable C isotopes. Global Change Biol 9:1204–1213. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00657.x
Han F, Hu W, Zheng J, Du F, Zhang X (2010) Estimating soil organic carbon storage and distribution in a catchment of Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma 154:261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.10.011
An SS, Mentler A, Mayer H, Blum WE (2010) Soil aggregation, aggregate stability, organic carbon and nitrogen in different soil aggregate fractions under forest and shrub vegetation on the Loess Plateau, China. CATENA 81:226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/jcatena201004002
Ren C, Wang J, Bastida F, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Yang Y, Wang J et al (2022) Microbial traits determine soil C emission in response to fresh carbon inputs in forests across biomes. Global Change Biol 28:1516–1528. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb16004
Feng X, Simpson AJ, Wilson KP, Dudley Williams D, Simpson MJ (2008) Increased cuticular carbon sequestration and lignin oxidation in response to soil warming. Nat Geosci 1:836–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo361
Jia Y, Zhai G, Zhu S, Liu X, Schmid B, Wang Z et al (2021) Plant and microbial pathways driving plant diversity effects on soil carbon accumulation in subtropical forest. Soil Biol Biochem 161:108375. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsoilbio2021108375
Mitchell E, Scheer C, Rowlings D, Cotrufo F, Conant RT, Grace P (2021) Important constraints on soil organic carbon formation efficiency in subtropical and tropical grasslands. Global Change Biol 27:5383–5391. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15807
Cotrufo MF, Soong JL, Horton AJ, Campbell EE, Haddix ML, Wall DH et al (2015) Formation of soil organic matter via biogeochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss. Nat Geosci 8:776–779. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2520
Schroth AW, Bostick BC, Kaste JM, Friedland AJ (2008) Lead sequestration and species redistribution during soil organic matter decomposition. Environ sci technol 42:3627–3633. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703002b
Liang C, Kästner M, Joergensen RG (2020) Microbial necromass on the rise: the growing focus on its role in soil organic matter development. Soil Biol Biochem 150:108006. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsoilbio2020108000
Fan X, Gao D, Zhao C, Wang C, Qu Y, Zhang J et al (2021) Improved model simulation of soil carbon cycling by representing the microbially derived organic carbon pool. ISME J 15:2248–2263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-00914-0
Gunina A, Kuzyakov Y (2022) From energy to (soil organic) matter. Global Change Biol 28:2169–2182. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb16071
Zhu F, Li Y, Xue S, Hartley W, Wu H (2016) Effects of iron-aluminium oxides and organic carbon on aggregate stability of bauxite residues. Environ Sci Pollut R 23:9073–9081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6172-9
An SS, Darboux F, Cheng M (2013) Revegetation as an efficient means of increasing soil aggregate stability on the Loess Plateau (China). Geoderma 209:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/jgeoderma201305020
Song X, Wang P, Van Zwieten L, Bolan N, Wang H, Li X et al (2022) Towards a better understanding of the role of Fe cycling in soil for carbon stabilization and degradation. Carbon Res 1:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-022-00008-2
Meyer M, Diehl D, Schaumann GE, Muñoz K (2021) Multiannual soil mulching in agriculture: Analysis of biogeochemical soil processes under plastic and straw mulches in a 3-year field study in strawberry cultivation. J Soils Sediment 21:3733–3752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-021-03037-3
Luan J, Li S, Dong W, Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu S (2021) Litter decomposition affected by bamboo expansion is modulated by litter-mixing and microbial composition. Funct Ecol 35:2562–2574. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13911
Craig ME, Geyer KM, Beidler KV, Brzostek ER, Frey SD, Stuart Grandy A et al (2022) Fast-decaying plant litter enhances soil carbon in temperate forests but not through microbial physiological traits. Nat Commun 13:1229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28715-9
Sokol NW, Whalen ED, Jilling A, Kallenbach C, Pett-Ridge J, Georgiou K (2022) Global distribution, formation and fate of mineral-associated soil organic matter under a changing climate: A trait-based perspective. Funct Ecol 36:1411–1429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14040
Henson SA, Sanders R, Madsen E (2012) Global patterns in efficiency of particulate organic carbon export and transfer to the deep ocean. Global Biogeochem Cycles 26:GB1028. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004099
Lin Y, Ye G, Kuzyakov Y, Liu D, Fan J, Ding W (2019) Long-term manure application increases soil organic matter and aggregation, and alters microbial community structure and keystone taxa. Soil Biol Biochem 134:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.030
Wander MM, Bidart MG (2000) Tillage practice influences on the physical protection, bioavailability and composition of particulate organic matter. Biol Fert Soils 32:360–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740000260
Kan ZR, Liu WX, Liu WS, Lal R, Dang YP, Zhao X et al (2022) Mechanisms of soil organic carbon stability and its response to no-till: A global synthesis and perspective. Global Change Biol 28:693–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15968
Zheng Y, Zhang Z, Chen Y, An S, Zhang L, Chen F et al (2022) Influence of Dissolved Organic Carbon on the Adsorption and Desorption of Cadmium in Reclaimed Soil. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 21:405–412. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2022.v21i01.048
Li T, Liu Y, Yang R, Chen T, Li G (2023) The rare earth elements of sequentially leached phases in the loess-paleosol sequence at Weinan on the southeastern Chinese Loess Plateau. Quatern Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2023.05.001
Arenas LR, Gentile SR, Zimmermann S, Stoll S (2021) Nanoplastics adsorption and removal efficiency by granular activated carbon used in drinking water treatment process. Sci Total Environ 791:148175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148175
Wang D, Xu H, Ma J, Giannakis S, Lu X, Chi H et al (2019) Enhanced mineralization of atrazine by surface induced hydroxyl radicals over light-weight granular mixed-quartz sands with ozone. Water Res 149:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.002
Li T, Yuan Y, Mou Z, Li Y, Kuang L, Zhang J et al (2023) Faster accumulation and greater contribution of glomalin to the soil organic carbon pool than amino sugars do under tropical coastal forest restoration. Global Change Biol 29:533–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb16467
Kleber M, Bourg IC, Coward EK, Hansel CM, Myneni SC, Nunan N (2021) Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter interface. Nat Rev Earth Env 2:402–421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00162-y
Panchal P, Preece C, Peñuelas J, Giri J (2022) Soil carbon sequestration by root exudates. Trends Plant Sci 27:749–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2022.04.009
Guidi C, Frey B, Brunner I, Meusburger K, Vogel ME, Chen X et al (2022) Soil fauna drives vertical redistribution of soil organic carbon in a long-term irrigated dry pine forest. Global change biol 28(9):3145–3160. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16122
Hemingway JD, Rothman DH, Grant KE, Rosengard SZ, Eglinton TI, Derry L (2019) Mineral protection regulates long-term global preservation of natural organic carbon. Nature 570(7760):228–231. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1280-6
Ma T, Zhu S, Wang Z, Chen D, Dai G, Feng B et al (2018) Divergent accumulation of microbial necromass and plant lignin components in grassland soils. Nat Commun 9:3480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05891-1
Jiao S, Chen W, Wang J, Du N, Li Q, Wei G (2018) Soil microbiomes with distinct assemblies through vertical soil profiles drive the cycling of multiple nutrients in reforested ecosystems. Microbiome 6:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0526-0
Kong W, Wei X, Wu Y, Shao M, Zhang Q, Sadowsky MJ et al (2022) Afforestation can lower microbial diversity and functionality in deep soil layers in a semiarid region. Global Change Biol 28:6086–6101. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb16334
Yang Y, Dou Y, Wang B, Wang Y, Liang C, An S et al (2022) Increasing contribution of microbial residues to soil organic carbon in grassland restoration chronosequence. Soil Biol Biochem 170:108688. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsoilbio2022108688
Zakem EJ, Cael BB, Levine NM (2021) A unified theory for organic matter accumulation. PNAS 118:e2016896118. https://doi.org/10.1101/20200925314021
Hartmann M, Six J (2022) Soil structure and microbiome functions in agroecosystems. Nat Rev Earth Env 4:4–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00366-w
Cotrufo MF, Lavallee JM (2022) Soil organic matter formation, persistence, and functioning: a synthesis of current understanding to inform its conservation and regeneration. Adv Agron 172:1–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2021.11.002
Tong D, Wang Y, Yu H, Shen H, Dahlgren RA, Xu J. Viral lysing can alleviate microbial nutrient limitations and accumulate recalcitrant dissolved organic matter components in soil. ISME J. 2023;1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01438-5
Doetterl S, Stevens A, Six J, Merckx R, Van Oost K, Casanova Pinto M et al (2015) Soil carbon storage controlled by interactions between geochemistry and climate. Nat Geosci 8:780–783. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2516
Doetterl S, Berhe AA, Nadeu E, Wang Z, Sommer M, Fiener P (2016) Erosion, deposition and soil carbon: a review of process-level controls, experimental tools and models to address C cycling in dynamic landscapes. Earth-Sci Rev 154:102–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.12.005
Feng J, Zeng XM, Zhang Q, Zhou XQ, Liu YR, Huang Q (2021) Soil microbial trait-based strategies drive metabolic efficiency along an altitude gradient. ISME Commun 1:71. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00076-2
Smith WP, Wucher BR, Nadell CD, Foster KR (2023) Bacterial defences: mechanisms, evolution and antimicrobial resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 21:519–534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00877-3
Lehmann J, Hansel CM, Kaiser C, Kleber M, Maher K, Manzoni S et al (2020) Persistence of soil organic carbon caused by functional complexity. Nat Geosci 13:529–534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0612-3
Witzgall K, Vidal A, Schubert DI, Höschen C, Schweizer SA, Buegger F et al (2021) Particulate organic matter as a functional soil component for persistent soil organic carbon. Nat Commun 12:4115. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24192-8
Tuo D, Gao G, Chang R, Li Z, Ma Y, Wang S et al (2018) Effects of revegetation and precipitation gradient on soil carbon and nitrogen variations in deep profiles on the Loess Plateau of China. Sci Total Environ 626:399–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/jscitotenv201801116
Lan Z, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Jiao R, Khan MN, Sial TA et al (2021) Long-term vegetation restoration increases deep soil carbon storage in the Northern Loess Plateau. Sci Rep 11:13758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93157-0
Yang Y, Liang C, Wang Y, Cheng H, An S, Chang SX (2020) Soil extracellular enzyme stoichiometry reflects the shift from P-to N-limitation of microorganisms with grassland restoration. Soil Biol Biochem 149:107928. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsoilbio2020107928
Sofo A, Mininni AN, Ricciuti P (2020) Comparing the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in sustainably and conventionally managed olive orchards. Geoderma 372:114393. https://doi.org/10.1016/jgeoderma2020114393
Plaza C, Courtier-Murias D, Fernández JM, Polo A, Simpson AJ (2013) Physical, chemical, and biogeochemical mechanisms of soil organic matter stabilization under conservation tillage systems: a central role for microbes and microbial by-products in C sequestration. Soil Biol Biochem 57:124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.026
Miralles I, Ortega R, Sánchez-Marañón M, Soriano M, Almendros G (2007) Assessment of biogeochemical trends in soil organic matter sequestration in Mediterranean calcimorphic mountain soils (Almería, Southern Spain). Soil Biol Biochem 39:2459–2470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.04.017
Muneer MA, Wang P, Zhang J, Li Y, Munir MZ, Ji B (2020) Formation of common mycorrhizal networks significantly affects plant biomass and soil properties of the neighboring plants under various nitrogen levels. Microorganisms 8:230. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020230
Zhong Q, Zhang S, Chen H, Li T, Zhang C, Xu X et al (2019) The influence of climate, topography, parent material and vegetation on soil nitrogen fractions. CATENA 175:329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.027
Luo Z, Feng W, Luo Y, Baldock J, Wang E (2017) Soil organic carbon dynamics jointly controlled by climate, carbon inputs, soil properties and soil carbon fractions. Global change biol 23:4430–4439. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13767
Sokolov AP, Kicklighter DW, Melillo JM, Felzer BS, Schlosser CA, Cronin TW (2008) Consequences of considering carbon–nitrogen interactions on the feedbacks between climate and the terrestrial carbon cycle. J Climate 21:3776–3796. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI20381
Luo Y, Weng E (2011) Dynamic disequilibrium of the terrestrial carbon cycle under global change. Trends Ecol Evol 26:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/jtree201011003
Schimel D, Stephens BB, Fisher JB (2015) Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. PNAS 112:436–441. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas1407302112
Xiao J, Chevallier F, Gomez C, Guanter L, Hicke JA, Huete AR et al (2019) Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: a review of advances over 50 years. Remote Sens Environ 233:111383. https://doi.org/10.1016/jrse2019111383
Sinsabaugh RL, Manzoni S, Moorhead DL, Richter A (2013) Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry methodology and modelling. Ecol Lett 16:930–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele12113
Wieder WR, Bonan GB, Allison SD (2013) Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes. Nat Clim Change 3:909–912. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1951
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (grant nos. 42377241; 42107282), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. 2023430), the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (grant no. 22JR5RA075), General Projects of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (grant no. 2021JQ-168).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YY and Z-PP conceived and designed this study. YY, SY, SH, L-ZM, Q-JB performed the field trip, sample analysis and data analysis. YY, W-YQ drafted the original manuscript. A-SS provided very constructive suggestions.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The manuscript is original and not submitted to other journal. The authors consent to participate in the manuscript.
Consent for publication
The manuscript has been read and approved by all authors, and all authors agree to the publication of the manuscript.
Competing interests
Changying Zhao is the editor-in-chief of Carbon Neutrality and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Zhang, Pp., Song, Y. et al. The structure and development of Loess Critical Zone and its soil carbon cycle. Carb Neutrality 3, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-023-00076-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-023-00076-2