Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Critical Appraisal of Review Studies in Circular Economy: a Tertiary Study

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Circular Economy and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of the circular economy has greatly increased in the past few years, and consequently, the interest in the circular economy as a research field has also increased, which led to an exponential growth in the number of literature reviews on the subject with different purposes. In order to analyze the topics that have been studied and assess the quality of these secondary reviews, this study carried out a tertiary literature review on the subject. This study identified the literature reviews on the circular economy, the most frequently cited papers, and the main research topics in the field. We have also analyzed the types of research questions that have been proposed by secondary studies. Finally, we evaluated the extent to which secondary reviews have assessed the quality of primary studies. We found out that literature reviews on the circular economy are frequently related to the areas of supply chain and technology. We also concluded that there is a need for designing research questions that explore more complex relationships, since most questions are descriptive or process-related. Some research questions are proposed to guide future studies. We also observed that secondary studies have failed to appropriately assess the quality of primary studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable

Code Availability

Not applicable

References

  1. Cattelan G, Elaine N (2017) Scientific literature analysis on big data and internet of things applications on circular economy : a bibliometric study. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2281-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl 127(September):221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sauvé S, Bernard S, Sloan P (2016) Environmental sciences , sustainable development and circular economy : Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environ Dev 17:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goyal S, Chauhan S, Mishra P (2021) Circular economy research: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2019) and future research insights. J Clean Prod:125011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125011

  5. Ghisellini P, Ripa M, Ulgiati S (2018) Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. J Clean Prod 178:618–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guarnieri P, Cerqueira-Streit JA, Batista LC (2020) Reverse logistics and the sectoral agreement of packaging industry in Brazil towards a transition to circular economy. Resour Conserv Recycl 153, no. October 2018:104541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod 114:11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bag S, Yadav G, Dhamija P, Kataria KK (2021) Key resources for industry 4.0 adoption and its effect on sustainable production and circular economy: An empirical study. J Clean Prod 281(xxxx):125233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mhatre P, Panchal R, Singh A, Bibyan S (2020) A systematic literature review on the circular economy initiatives in the European Union. Sustain Prod Consum 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.008

  10. Ferasso M, Beliaeva T, Kraus S, Clauss T, Ribeiro-Soriano D (2020) Circular economy business models: the state of research and avenues ahead. Bus Strateg Environ 29(8):3006–3024. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geissdoerfer M, Savaget P, Bocken NMP, Hultink EJ (2017) The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm? J Clean Prod 143:757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suzanne E, Absi N, Borodin V (2020) Towards circular economy in production planning: challenges and opportunities. Eur J Oper Res 287(1):168–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shekarian E (2020) A review of factors affecting closed-loop supply chain models. J Clean Prod 253:119823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raza SA (2020) A systematic literature review of closed-loop supply chains. Benchmarking 27(6):1765–1798. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2019-0464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abedinnia H, Glock CH, Grosse EH, Schneider M (2017) Machine scheduling problems in production: a tertiary study. Comput Ind Eng 111(April):403–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.06.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garousi V, Mäntylä MV (2016) A systematic literature review of literature reviews in software testing. Inf Softw Technol 80:195–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martins CL, Pato MV (2019) Supply chain sustainability: a tertiary literature review. J Clean Prod 225:995–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cubric M (2020) Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technol Soc 62(March):101257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barata J (2021) The fourth industrial revolution of supply chains: A tertiary study. J Eng Technol Manag - JET-M 60(May 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101624

  20. Hochrein S, Glock CH, Bogaschewsky R, Heider M (2015) Literature reviews in supply chain management: a tertiary study. Manag Rev Q 65(4):239–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-015-0113-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Verner JM, Brereton OP, Kitchenham BA, Turner M, Niazi M (2014) Risks and risk mitigation in global software development: a tertiary study. Inf Softw Technol 56(1):54–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Da Silva FQB, Santos ALM, Soares S, Frana ACC, Monteiro CVF, MacIel FF (2011) Six years of systematic literature reviews in software engineering: an updated tertiary study. Inf Softw Technol 53(9):899–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim CS, Bai BH, Kim PB, Chon K (2018) Review of reviews: A systematic analysis of review papers in the hospitality and tourism literature. Int J Hosp Manag 70(April 2017):49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sehnem S, Kuzma E, Julkovsky DJ (2021) Megatrends in circular economy: avenues for relevant advancements in organizations. Circ Econ Sustain 1:173–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00036-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hofstetter JS, De Marchi V, Sarkis J, Govindan K, Klassen R, Ometto AR (2021) From sustainable global value chains to circular economy — different silos, different perspectives, but many opportunities to build bridges. Circ Econ Sustain 1:21–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00015-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sassanelli C, Rosa P, Rocca R, Terzi S (2019) Circular economy performance assessment methods : a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 229:440–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stefanakis A, Calheiros CSC, Nikolaou I (2021) Nature-based solutions as a tool in the new circular economic model for climate change adaptation. Circ Econ Sustain 1:303–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00022-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jia F, Yin S, Chen L, Chen X (2020) The circular economy in the textile and apparel industry : a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 259:120728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dissanayake DGK, Weerasinghe D (2021) Towards circular economy in fashion: review of strategies, barriers and enablers. Circ. Econ. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00090-5

  30. Hart J, Pomponi F (2021) A circular economy: where will it take us? Circ Econ Sustain 1:127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00013-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bocken NMP, Weissbrod I, Antikainen M (2021) Business model experimentation for the circular economy : definition and approaches. Circ Econ Sustain 1:49–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00026-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cifuentes-faura J (2021) Circular Economy and Sustainability as a Basis for Economic Recovery Post-COVID-19. Circ Econ Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00065-6

  33. Vinante C, Sacco P, Orzes G, Borgianni Y (2020) Circular economy metrics: literature review and company-level classification framework. J Clean Prod:125090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125090

  34. Ranta V, Aarikka-stenroos L, Väisänen J (2021) Digital technologies catalyzing business model innovation for circular economy — Multiple case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 164:105155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rizos V et al (2016) Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustain 8(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111212

  36. Munaro MR, Tavares SF, Bragança L (2020) Towards circular and more sustainable buildings : a systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment. J Clean Prod 260:121134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bressanelli G, Saccani N, Pigosso DCA, Perona M (2020) Circular economy in the WEEE industry : a systematic literature review and a research agenda. Sustain Prod Consum 23:174–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. De Pascale A, Arbolino R, Szopik-Depczyńska K, Limosani M, Ioppolo G (2021) A systematic review for measuring circular economy: the 61 indicators. J Clean Prod 281:124942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Amato DD (2021) Sustainability narratives as transformative solution pathways: zooming in on the circular economy. Circ Econ Sustain 1:231–242. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00008-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Acerbi F, Taisch M (2020) A literature review on circular economy adoption in the manufacturing sector. J Clean Prod 273:123086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. M. Antoniadou, T. Varzakas, and I. Tzoutzas, “Circular economy in conjunction with treatment methodologies in the biomedical and dental waste sectors,” Circ Econ Sustain., 2021, doi: https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-020-00001-0.

  42. Webster K (2021) A circular economy is about the economy. Circ Econ Sustain 1:115–126. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00034-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nikolaou IE, Jones N, Stefanakis A (2021) Circular economy and sustainability: the past, the present and the future directions. Circ Econ. Sustain 1:1–20. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00030-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liaros S (2021) Circular food futures: what will they look like? Sustain. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00082-5

  45. Dumée LF (2021) Circular materials and circular design — review on challenges towards sustainable manufacturing and recycling. Circ Econ Sustain. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00085-2

  46. de Oliveira CT, Mônica MMM, Campos LMS (2019) Understanding the Brazilian expanded polystyrene supply chain and its reverse logistics towards circular economy. J Clean Prod 235:562–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Farooque M, Zhang A, Thürer M, Qu T (2019) Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review. J Clean Prod 228:882–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Julianelli V, Caiado RGG, Scavarda LF, Cruz SP d MF (2020) Interplay between reverse logistics and circular economy: Critical success factors-based taxonomy and framework. Resour Conserv Recycl 158(November 2018):104784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rosa P, Sassanelli C, Urbinati A, Chiaroni D (2019) Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review. Int J Prod Res:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896

  50. Kirchherr J et al (2018) Barriers to the circular economy: evidence From the European Union (EU). Ecol Econ 150(April):264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Barros MV, Salvador R, De Francisco AC, Piekarski CM (2020) Mapping of research lines on circular economy practices in agriculture: from waste to energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 131:109958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3):207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. V. Smith, D. Devane, C. M Begley, and M. Clarke, “Methodology in conducting a systematic review of biomedical research,” Med Res Method, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61–73, 2011.

  54. Kitchenham B (2004) Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele Univ 33(TR/SE-0401):28 10.1.1.122.3308

    Google Scholar 

  55. do Carmo Netto NW, de Farias Oliveira Cardoso B, do Carmo LFRRS, Pinto RM (2020) Green Logistics: A Tertiary Study and a Research Agenda:1055–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23816-2_104

  56. Barbosa MW, Vicente A d l C, Ladeira MB, de Oliveira MPV (2017) Managing supply chain resources with Big Data Analytics : a systematic review. Int J Log Res Appl 21(3):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2017.1369501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Moe M, Skaar C, Magerholm A (2021) Circular economy in manufacturing companies : A review of case study literature. J Clean Prod 294:126268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Merli R, Preziosi M, Acampora A (2018) How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112

  59. Govindan K, Hasanagic M (2018) A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. Int J Prod Res 56(1–2):278–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Akhimien NG, Latif E, Hou SS (2021) Application of circular economy principles in buildings: a systematic review. J Build Eng 38:102041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Coenen J, van der Heijden RECM, van Riel ACR (2018) Understanding approaches to complexity and uncertainty in closed-loop supply chain management: past findings and future directions. J Clean Prod 201:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Easterbrook S, Singer J, Storey M-A, Damian D (2008) Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research guide to advanced empirical software engineering. Guid Adv Empir Softw Eng:285–311

  63. CRD (2010) About DARE

  64. Govindan K, Soleimani H (2017) A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: a Journal of Cleaner Production focus. J Clean Prod 142:371–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Guan G, Jiang Z, Gong Y, Huang Z, Jamalnia A (2021) A Bibliometric Review of Two Decades’ Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain: 2001-2020. IEEE Access 9(February 2003):3679–3695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. de Sousa Jabbour ABL et al (2019) Circular economy business models and operations management. J Clean Prod 235:1525–1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. López Ruiz LA, Roca Ramón X, Gassó Domingo S (2020) The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector – A review and an integrative model approach. J Clean Prod 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238

  68. Snyder H (2019) Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 104(March):333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ogunmakinde OE, Sher W, Egbelakin T (2021) Circular economy pillars: a semi-systematic review. Clean Technol Environ Policy 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-02012-9

  70. Budgen D, Brereton P, Drummond S, Williams N (2018) Reporting systematic reviews: some lessons from a tertiary study. Inf Softw Technol 95:62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Gurova O, Merritt TR, Papachristos E, Vaajakari J (2020) Sustainable solutions for wearable technologies: Mapping the product development life cycle. Sustain. 12(20):1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. de Oliveira MM, Lago A, Dal’ Magro GP (2021) Food loss and waste in the context of the circular economy: a systematic review. J Clean Prod 294:126284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Jiang C, Bhat CR, Lam WHK (2020) A bibliometric overview of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological in the past forty years (1979–2019). Transp Res Part B Methodol 138:268–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. R. M. Yilmaz, F. B. Topu, and A. Takkaç Tulgar, “An examination of the studies on foreign language teaching in pre-school education: a bibliometric mapping analysis,” Comput Assist Lang Learn, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–24, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1681465.

  75. Kosmützky A, Krücken G (2014) Growth or steady state? A bibliometric focus on international comparative higher education research. High Educ 67(4):457–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9694-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Hernández-Torrano D, Ibrayeva L (2020) Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Think Ski Creat 35(December 2019):100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Barbosa MW (2021) Uncovering research streams on Agri-Food Supply Chain Management: a bibliometric study. Glob Food Sec 28:100517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Inf Secur 11(4):959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Barbosa MW, Ferreira-Lopes L (2021) Emerging trends in telecollaboration and virtual exchange: a bibliometric study. Educ Rev:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1907314

  81. Della Corte V, Del Gaudio G, Sepe F, Sciarelli F (2019) Sustainable tourism in the open innovation realm: A bibliometric analysis. Sustain. 11(21):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Souza GC (2013) Closed-loop supply Chains: a critical review, and future research*. Decis Sci 44(1):7–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00394.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Islam MS, Moeinzadeh S, Tseng ML, Tan K (2020) A literature review on environmental concerns in logistics: trends and future challenges. Int J Log Res Appl:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1732313

  84. Baah C, Jin Z, Tang L (2020) Organizational and regulatory stakeholder pressures friends or foes to green logistics practices and financial performance: Investigating corporate reputation as a missing link. J Clean Prod 247:119125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Sassanelli C, Urbinati A, Rosa P, Chiaroni D, Terzi S (2020) Addressing circular economy through design for X approaches : A systematic literature review. Comput Ind 120:103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Bag S, Yadav G, Wood LC, Dhamija P, Joshi S (2020) Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: Resource melioration in logistics. Resour Policy 68(November 2019):101776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Konyalıoğlu AK, Zafeirakopoulos İB (2020) A literature review on closed loop supply chains. Lect Notes Mech Eng (January):547–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2_48

  88. Wang X (2019) Study on relationship between green logistics activity and logistics performance. Clust Comput 22:6579–6588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2344-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Gomes RR, Barbosa MW (2018) An analysis of the structure and evolution of the distance education research area community in terms of coauthorships. Int J Distance Educ Technol 16(2)

  90. Heikkurinen P, Bonnedahl KJ (2013) Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: a review and conceptual comparison of market- and stakeholder-oriented strategies. J Clean Prod 43:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Barbosa MW, Oliveira VM (2021) The Corporate Social Responsibility professional: A content analysis of job advertisements. J Clean Prod 279:123665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Gupta M, George JF (2016) Toward the development of a big data analytics capability. Inf Manag 53(8):1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. De Arroyabe JCF, Arranz N, Schumann M, Arroyabe MF (2021) The development of CE business models in firms : The role of circular economy capabilities. Technovation 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102292

  94. Vanderstraeten J, van Witteloostuijn A, Matthyssens P, Andreassi T (2016) Being flexible through customization − The impact of incubator focus and customization strategies on incubatee survival and growth. J Eng Technol Manag 41:45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Xie K, Song Y, Zhang W, Hao J, Liu Z, Chen Y (2018) Technological entrepreneurship in science parks: A case study of Wuhan Donghu High-Tech Zone. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 135:156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Ribeiro J d A, Ladeira MB, de Faria AF, Barbosa MW (2021) A reference model for science and technology parks strategic performance management: An emerging economy perspective. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. - JET-M 59(January):101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Armanios DE, Eesley CE, Jizhen L, Eisenhardt KM (2017) How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strateg Manag J 38(7):1373–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Bag S, Pretorius JHC, Gupta S, Dwivedi YK (2021) Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities. Technol Forecast Soc Change 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420

  99. García-Villaverde PM, Rodrigo-Alarcón J, Parra-Requena G, Ruiz-Ortega MJ (2018) Technological dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation: The heterogeneous effects of social capital. J Bus Res 83:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Chen Y, Wang Y, Nevo S, Benitez-Amado J, Kou G (2015) IT capabilities and product innovation performance: The roles of corporate entrepreneurship and competitive intensity. Inf Manag 52(6):643–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Auh S, Menguc B (2005) Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. J Bus Res 58(12):1652–1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Rosa P, Sassanelli C, Terzi S (2019) Towards Circular Business Models: A systematic literature review on classification frameworks and archetypes. J Clean Prod 236:117696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Khan IS, Ahmad MO, Majava J (2021) Industry 4.0 and sustainable development: A systematic mapping of triple bottom line, circular economy and sustainable business models perspectives. J Clean Prod 297:126655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Schaefer SD, Terlutter R, Diehl S (2019) Is my company really doing good? Factors influencing employees’ evaluation of the authenticity of their company’s corporate social responsibility engagement. J Bus Res 101(March 2018):128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Carroll AB (2016) Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. Int J Corp Soc Responsib 1(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Brusca I, Labrador M, Larran M (2018) The challenge of sustainability and integrated reporting at universities: A case study. J Clean Prod 188:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. IIRC, “Towards integrated reporting: Communication value in the 21st century.” 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Cortesi A, Vena L (2019) Disclosure quality under Integrated Reporting: A value relevance approach. J Clean Prod 220:745–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Payán-Sánchez B, Belmonte-Ureña LJ, Plaza-úbeda JA, Vazquez-Brust D, Yakovleva N, Pérez-Valls M (2021) Open innovation for sustainability or not: Literature reviews of global research trends. Sustain. 13(3):1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Isensee C, Teuteberg F, Griese KM, Topi C (2020) The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. J Clean Prod 275:122944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Alnajem M, Mostafa MM, ElMelegy AR (2021) Mapping the first decade of circular economy research: a bibliometric network analysis. J Ind Prod Eng 38(1):29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2020.1838632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. D’Amato D, Bartkowski B, Droste N (2020) Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research. Ambio 49(12):1878–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Johannesdottir SL et al (2020) What evidence exists on ecotechnologies for recycling carbon and nutrients from domestic wastewater? A systematic map. Environ Evid 9(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00207-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Waligóra A, Leszczyński G, Zmyślony P, Kot M (2020) Mapping the development of contextual knowledge in the area of the sharing economy. Ekon. i Prawo 19(3):551. https://doi.org/10.12775/eip.2020.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Tavares TM, Godinho Filho M, Ganga GMD, Callefi MHBM (2020) The relationship between additive manufacturing and circular economy: a sistematic review. Indep. J. Manag. Prod 11(5):1648. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i5.1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Chiappetta Jabbour CJ, Fiorini PDC, Ndubisi NO, Queiroz MM, Piato ÉL (2020) Digitally-enabled sustainable supply chains in the 21st century: A review and a research agenda. Sci Total Environ 725:138177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Borrello M, Pascucci S, Cembalo L (2020) Three propositions to unify circular economy research: A review. Sustain. 12(10):1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12104069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Barros MV, Salvador R, Piekarski CM, de Francisco AC (2019) Mapping of main research lines concerning life cycle studies on packaging systems in Brazil and in the world. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24(8):1429–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1573-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Reim W, Parida V, Sjödin DR (2019) Circular business models for the bio-economy: A review and new directions for future research. Sustain. 11(9):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Haddaway NR, Piniewski M, MacUra B (2019) What evidence exists relating to effectiveness of ecotechnologies in agriculture for the recovery and reuse of carbon and nutrients in the Baltic and boreoerate regions? A systematic map protocol. Environ Evid 8(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-019-0150-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Haddaway NR, Johannesdottir SL, Piniewski M, Macura B (2019) What ecotechnologies exist for recycling carbon and nutrients from domestic wastewater? A systematic map protocol 09 Engineering 0907 Environmental Engineering. Environ Evid 8(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0145-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Stewart R (2018) Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies : A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast - moving consumer goods sector. (January):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2048

  123. Tombido LL, Louw L, van Eeden J (2018) A systematic review of 3pls’ entry into reverse logistics. South African J Ind Eng 29(3 Special Edition):235–260. https://doi.org/10.7166/29-3-2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Batista L, Bourlakis M, Smart P, Maull R (2018) In search of a circular supply chain archetype–a content-analysis-based literature review. Prod Plan Control 29(6):438–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1343502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Govindan K, Fattahi M, Keyvanshokooh E (2017) Supply chain network design under uncertainty: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Eur J Oper Res 263(1):108–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Bonvoisin J, Halstenberg F, Buchert T, Stark R (2016) A systematic literature review on modular product design. J Eng Des 27(7):488–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2016.1166482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Zhang S, Lee CKM, Chan HK, Choy KL, Wu Z (2015) Swarm intelligence applied in green logistics: A literature review. Eng Appl Artif Intell 37:154–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2014.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Bai C, Sarkis J, Dou Y (2015) Corporate sustainability development in China: Review and analysis. Ind Manag Data Syst 115(1):5–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2014-0258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Stindt D, Sahamie R (2014) Review of research on closed loop supply chain management in the process industry. Flex Serv Manuf J 26(1–2):268–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-012-9137-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Chen L, Olhager J, Tang O (2014) Manufacturing facility location and sustainability: A literature review and research agenda. Int J Prod Econ 149:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Simic V (2012) A decade of the automobile shredder residue problem - a review of the state-of-the-art. 12th International Conference Research and Development in Mechanical Industry (January). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1667.5921

  132. Hassini E, Surti C, Searcy C (2012) A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Chan HK, Yin S, Chan FTS (2010) Implementing just-in-time philosophy to reverse logistics systems: A review. Int J Prod Res 48(21):6293–6313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903225213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Vieira DR, Vieira RK, Chang Chain M (2017) Strategy and management for the recycling of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRPs) in the aircraft industry: a critical review. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 24(3):214–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1204371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Guo S, Shen B, Choi TM, Jung S (2017) A review on supply chain contracts in reverse logistics: Supply chain structures and channel leaderships. J Clean Prod 144:387–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Diallo C, Venkatadri U, Khatab A, Bhakthavatchalam S (2017) State of the art review of quality, reliability and maintenance issues in closed-loop supply chains with remanufacturing. Int J Prod Res 55(5):1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1200152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Braz AC, De Mello AM, de Vasconcelos Gomes LA, de Souza Nascimento PT (2018) The bullwhip effect in closed-loop supply chains: A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 202:376–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Sarja M, Onkila T, Mäkelä M (2021) A systematic literature review of the transition to the circular economy in business organizations: Obstacles, catalysts and ambivalences. J Clean Prod 286:125492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Luiz G, Benachio F, Duarte C, Tavares SF (2020) Circular economy in the construction industry : A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 260:121046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Cruz FA, Boudaoud H, Camargo M, Pearce JM (2020) Plastic recycling in additive manufacturing : A systematic literature review and opportunities for the circular economy. J Clean Prod 264:121602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Wijewickrama MKCS, Chileshe N, Rameezdeen R, Ochoa JJ (2021) Information sharing in reverse logistics supply chain of demolition waste: A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 280:124359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Silvestri C, Silvestri L, Forcina A, Di Bona G, Falcone D (2021) Green chemistry contribution towards more equitable global sustainability and greater circular economy: A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 294:126137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Peng H, Shen N, Liao H, Xue H, Wang Q (2020) Uncertainty factors, methods, and solutions of closed-loop supply chain — A review for current situation and future prospects. J Clean Prod 254:120032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Govindan K, Soleimani H, Kannan D (2014) Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. Eur J Oper Res 240(3):603–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Paes LAB, Bezerra BS, Deus RM, Jugend D, Battistelle RAG (2019) Organic solid waste management in a circular economy perspective – A systematic review and SWOT analysis. J Clean Prod 239:118086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Marrucci L, Daddi T, Iraldo F (2019) The integration of circular economy with sustainable consumption and production tools: Systematic review and future research agenda. J Clean Prod 240:118268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Schenkel M, Caniëls MCJ, Krikke H, Van Der Laan E (2015) Understanding value creation in closed loop supply chains - Past findings and future directions. J Manuf Syst 37:729–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Barros MV, Salvador R, do Prado GF, de Francisco AC, Piekarski CM (2021) Circular economy as a driver to sustainable businesses. Clean. Environ. Syst 2(October 2020):100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2020.100006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Böckel A, Nuzum AK, Weissbrod I (2021) Blockchain for the circular economy: analysis of the research-practice gap. Sustain Prod Consum 25:525–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Gaur J, Mani V (2018) Antecedents of closed-loop supply chain in emerging economies: A conceptual framework using stakeholder’s perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl 139(May):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Glock CH (2017) Decision support models for managing returnable transport items in supply chains: A systematic literature review. Int J Prod Econ 183:561–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Fernandes S d C, Pigosso DCA, McAloone TC, Rozenfeld H (2020) Towards product-service system oriented to circular economy: A systematic review of value proposition design approaches. J Clean Prod 257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120507

  153. Mhatre P, Gedam V, Unnikrishnan S, Verma S (2021) Circular economy in built environment – Literature review and theory development. J Build Eng 35:101995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Govindan K, Bouzon M (2018) From a literature review to a multi-perspective framework for reverse logistics barriers and drivers. J Clean Prod 187:318–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Islam MT, Huda N (2018) Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)/E-waste: A comprehensive literature review. Resour Conserv Recycl 137(November 2017):48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Meherishi L, Narayana SA, Ranjani KS (2019) Sustainable packaging for supply chain management in the circular economy: A review. J Clean Prod 237:117582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Betancourt Morales CM, Zartha Sossa JW (2020) Circular economy in Latin America: A systematic literature review. Bus Strateg Environ 29(6):2479–2497. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Centobelli P, Cerchione R, Chiaroni D, Del Vecchio P, Urbinati A (2020) Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Bus Strateg Environ 29(4):1734–1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2466

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author of this paper was responsible for all phases of this study: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing, supervision, project administration, investigation, and resources.

Additional declarations for articles in life science journals that report the results of studies involving humans and/or animals are not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Werneck Barbosa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable

Consent for Publication

Not applicable

Appendix A. Secondary studies information

Appendix A. Secondary studies information

Study Id

Reference

Period cover

# of primary studies

[1]

[109]

2003–2019

121

[2]

[65]

2001–2020

1155

[3]

[110]

2009–2019

80

[4]

[111]

2009–2018

214

[5]

[112]

2011–2019

45

[6]

[113]

2013–2017

474

[7]

[71]

-

-

[8]

[51]

-

52

[9]

[114]

2011–2018

1411

[10]

[115]

2013–2019

10

[11]

[116]

2015–2019

33

[12]

[117]

2001–2019

-

[13]

[118]

1995–2017

47

[14]

[119]

-

42

[15]

[120]

2013–2017

-

[16]

[121]

2013–2017

25

[17]

[122]

2000–2016

46

[18]

[123]

2000–2018

134

[19]

[124]

1992–2017

49

[20]

[125]

2000–2015

170

[21]

[126]

1987–2015

163

[22]

[127]

1995–2014

115

[23]

[128]

1997–2013

189

[24]

[129]

1984–2012

167

[25]

[130]

1990–2011

81

[26]

[131]

1997–2012

62

[27]

[132]

2000–2010

87

[28]

[133]

1994–2009

125

[29]

[134]

2011–2015

-

[30]

[135]

2006–2016

62

[31]

[136]

1985–2015

104

[32]

[137]

2004–2018

56

[33]

[138]

2005–2018

69

[34]

[139]

2015–2019

45

[35]

[26]

2009–2018

45

[36]

[85]

1999–2019

31

[37]

[140]

2009–2019

92

[38]

[9]

2010–2020

151

[39]

[141]

2000–2019

89

[40]

[142]

2002–2020

95

[41]

[36]

2006–2019

318

[42]

[143]

2004–2018

302

[43]

[13]

2004–2018

215

[44]

[64]

2001–2014

84

[45]

[144]

2007–2013

382

[46]

[33]

2007–2020

107

[47]

[40]

2010–2019

215

[48]

[58]

2004–2017

617

[49]

[145]

2009–2019

33

[50]

[61]

-

64

[51]

[103]

2012–2020

81

[52]

[146]

2001–2018

35

[53]

[60]

2010–2020

64

[54]

[147]

1998–2014

144

[55]

[148]

2016–2020

38

[56]

[149]

2016–2020

30

[57]

[102]

2000–2018

283

[58]

[150]

1992–2015

141

[59]

[151]

1981–2015

33

[60]

[38]

2000–2019

61

[61]

[152]

2007–2018

46

[62]

[153]

2007–2020

80

[63]

[57]

1999–2019

80

[64]

[154]

2004–2015

54

[65]

[12]

1994–2019

160

[66]

[72]

2011–2020

40

[67]

[67]

2003–2018

53

[68]

[11]

2006–2016

67

[69]

[10]

2013–2019

253

[70]

[59]

2006–2016

60

[71]

[14]

2008–2019

333

[72]

[66]

2008–2018

214

[73]

[37]

2000–2019

115

[74]

[7]

2004–2014

155

[75]

[49]

2000–2018

158

[76]

[69]

-

-

[77]

[4]

2000–2019

2279

[78]

[47]

2006–2018

261

[79]

[1]

2006–2015

70

[80]

[28]

2002–2019

109

[81]

[155]

1997–2017

157

[82]

[156]

2000–2018

59

[83]

[157]

1982–2019

57

[84]

[158]

2013–2018

133

[85]

[24]

-

38

[86]

[31]

2011–2020

39

[87]

[43]

2011–2021

3348

[88]

[29]

2000–2020

64

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barbosa, M.W. A Critical Appraisal of Review Studies in Circular Economy: a Tertiary Study. Circ.Econ.Sust. 2, 473–505 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00123-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00123-z

Keywords

Navigation