Abstract
Cross-national variations in official crime rates likely represent several concurrent criminological and non-criminological phenomena beyond actual crime occurrence, resulting in puzzling relationships between variables. For example, research shows that structural gender equality predicts official rape rates. I extend this literature by examining whether the ethos or mainstream country-level attitudes and beliefs toward gender equality (or gender egalitarianism) affect official rape rates. Results suggest that while countries with higher levels of gender egalitarianism in the public sphere have higher official rape rates, nations with higher levels of gender-private egalitarianism have lower official rape rates. These outcomes imply that progressive attitudes toward the full participation of women in work, education, and politics are disjointed from gender-egalitarian views on parenting, divorce, and abortion. My findings align with previous studies showing a paradoxical positive association between structural gender equality and official rape rates. I problematize earlier interpretations of similar results as a backlash effect of women’s parity. Throughout the paper, I reflect on the impact of statistical and social factors in constructing official rape rates. I propose using an updated gender ideology framework to understand the complex relationship between private and public dimensions of equalitarianism and official rape rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
This study analyzed existing data, which is openly available at locations cited in the reference section.
References
Aebi, M. F., Akdeniz, G., Barclay, G., Campistol, C., Caneppele, S., Gruszczyńska, B., Harrendorf, S., Heiskanen, M., Hysi, V., Jehle, J., Jokinen, A., Kensey, A., Killias, M., Lewis, C.G., Savona, E., Smit, P., & Bórisdóttir, R. (2017). European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice statistics 2014. (5th ed., second revised printing). Retrieved September 23, 2020 from https://wp.unil.ch/europeansourcebook/printed-editions-2/5th-edition/
Aebi, M.F., Caneppele, S., Harrendorf, S., Hashimoto, Y.Z. Jehle, J., Khan, T.S., Kühn, O., Lewis, C., Molnar, L., Smit, P., Þórisdóttir, R., & ESB Network of National Correspondents (2021). European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice statistics–2021 (6th Ed.). Retrieved December 27, 2022 from https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/75062
Aebi, M. F. (2010). Methodological issues in the comparison of police-recorded crime rates. In S. G. Shoham, P. Knepper, & M. Kett (Eds.), International handbook of criminology (pp. 211–227). CRC Press.
Antonaccio, O., & Tittle, C. R. (2007). Cross-national test of bonger’s theory of criminality and economic conditions. Criminology, 45, 701–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00098.x
Aromaa, K., Leppä, S., Nevala, S., & Ollus, N. (Eds.) (2003). Report on the Sixth United Nations survey on crime trends and criminal justice systems. Retrieved September 23, 2020. http://old.heuni.fi/material/attachments/heuni/reports/6KjPWrPjr/40_Crime_and_Cirminal_Justice_in_Europe_and_North_America_1995-1997.pdf
Austin, R. L., & Kim, Y. S. (2000). A cross-national examination of the relationship between gender equality and official rape rates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44(2), 204–221.
Baumer, E. P., Felson, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2003). Changes in police notification for rape, 1973–2000. Criminology, 41(3), 841–870.
Bradley, K., & Khor, D. (1993). Toward an integration of theory and research on the status of women. Gender & Society, 7(3), 347–378.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: men, women, and rape. Fawcett Books.
Chon, D. S. (2013). Test of impacts of gender equality and economic development on sexual violence. Journal of Family Violence, 28(6), 603–610.
Chon, D. S. (2014). Police reporting by sexual assault victims in western and in non-western countries. Journal of Family Violence, 29(8), 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9644-z
Chon, D. S., & Clifford, J. E. (2021). The impacts of international rape laws upon official rape rates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(2–3), 244–261.
De Bondt, W. (2014). Evidence-based EU criminal policy making: In search of matching data. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 20(1), 23–49.
EIGE (2015). 2015 gender equality index. Retrieved March 22, 2022 from https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2015/DK
England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475
Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., Loayza, N., Reuter, P., Roman, J., & Gaviria, A. (2000). Crime and victimization: An economic perspective [withcomments]. Economia, 1(1), 219–302.
Frank, D. J., Camp, B. J., & Boutcher, S. A. (2010). Worldwide trends in the criminal regulation of sex, 1945 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 867–893.
Frank, D. J., Hardinge, T., & Wosick-Correa, K. (2009). The global dimensions of rape-law reform: A cross-national study of policy outcomes. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 272–290.
Glas, S., Spierings, N., & Scheepers, P. (2018). Re-understanding religion and support for gender equality in Arab Countries. Gender & Society, 32(5), 686–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218783670
Gottfredson, M. R. (1986). Substantive contributions of victimization surveys. Crime and Justice, 7, 251–287.
Gracia, E., & Merlo, J. (2016). Intimate partner violence against women and the Nordic paradox. Social Science & Medicine, 157, 27–30.
Gruszczyńska, B., & Heiskanen, M. (2018). Trends in police-recorded offenses at the beginning of the twenty-first century in Europe. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24(1), 37–53.
ICVS International Working Group, del Frate, A. A., van Dijk, J. J., van Kesteren, J., & Mayhew, P. (2002). International Crime Victimization Survey, 1989–2000 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Netherlands: University of Leiden/Turin, Italy: United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI)[producers], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research 2003 [distributor].
Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (Eds.) (2014) World value survey: all rounds–country-pooled datafile version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Retrieved September 23, 2020 from https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp
IPU (2022) Global data on national parliaments: Historical data on women in national parliaments (1945–2018). IPU Parline Data. Retrieved March 4, 2022 from https://data.ipu.org/historical-women
Jelen, T. G., & Bradley, J. D. (2014). Abortion opinion in emerging democracies: Latin America and Central Europe. Politics, Groups & Identities, 2(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2013.876916
Jensen, G. F., & Karpos, M. (1993). Managing rape: Exploratory research on the behavior of rape statistics. Criminology, 31(3), 363–385.
LaFont, S. (2001). One step forward, two steps back: Women in the post-communist states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 34(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(01)00006-X
Lewis, C. (2012). Crime and justice statistics collected by international agencies. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 18(1), 5–21.
MacDonald, Z. (2002). Official crime statistics: Their use and interpretation. The Economic Journal, 112(477), F85–F106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00685
O’Brien, R. M. (2003). UCR violent crime rates, 1958–2000: Recorded and offender-generated trends. Social Science Research, 32(3), 499–518.
Pope, A. (2017). World rape statistics. The University of Edinburgh.
Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Gender as an organizing force in social relations: the implications for the future of gender equality. In F. D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), The declining significance of gender (pp. 265–288). Russell Sage Foundation.
Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Gender at home. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755776.001.0001
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1974). Women, culture and society: A theoretical overview. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Women, culture, and society. Stanford University Press.
Russell, D. E. (1984). The politics of rape: The victim’s perspective. iUniverse Inc.
Sanday, P. R. (1974). Female status in the public domain. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Women, culture, and society. Stanford University Press.
Sanday, P. R. (1981). The sociocultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01068.x
Shafer, E. F. (2021). Invited commentary: The uneven gender revolution and the gender gap in depression in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 190(7), 1207–1209. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab003
Shah, A. (2018). ASDOC: Stata module to create high-quality tables in MS Word from stata output. Statistical Software Components S458466, Boston College Department of Economics.
Soares, R. R. (2004a). Crime reporting as a measure of institutional development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(4), 851–871.
Soares, R. R. (2004b). Development, crime, and punishment: Accounting for the international differences in crime rates. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 155–184.
UNDP (2004). Human development report 2004: Cultural liberty in today’s diverse world. New York. Retrieved February 17, 2022 from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2004
UNODC (2020) United Nations surveys on crime trends and the operations of criminal justice systems (UN-CTS). UNODC Data Portal. Retrieved September 23, 2020 from https://dataunodc.un.org
UN Women (2011). Progress for the World’s Women 2011–2012. In pursuit of justice. Executive Summary. Retrieved May 6, 2019 from http://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2011/7/progress-of-the-world-s-women-in-pursuit-of-justice#view
UN Women (2022). Proportion of women in managerial positions (%). Data Hub, SDG indicator dashboard: gender equality. Retrieved February 17, 2022 from https://data.unwomen.org
Van Dijk, J. J. M., & del Frate, A. A. (2004). Criminal victimization and victim services across the world: Results and prospects of the international crime victims survey. International Perspectives in Victimology, 1(1), 14–34.
Van Dijk, J. J. M., van Kesteren, J., & Smit, P. (2007). Criminal victimization in global perspective. Key findings from the 2004/2005 ICVS and EU ICS. WODC, The Hague.
Von Hofer, H. (2000). Crime statistics as constructs: The case of Swedish rape statistics. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(1), 77–89.
Webster, K., Ward, A., Diemer, K., Flood, M., Honey, N., Morgan, J., Politoff, V., Powell, A., & Stubbs, J. (2021). How are gender inequality and violence against women related? Findings from a population-level community attitudes survey. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.158
Whaley, R. B. (2001). The paradoxical relationship between gender inequality and rape: Toward a refined theory. Gender & Society, 15(4), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015004003
Whaley, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2002). Gender equality and gendered homicides. Homicide Studies, 6(3), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/108876790200600302
World Bank. (2020) Population total. Retrieved July 5, 2020, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?end=2010
World Bank (2022b). Education statistics—all indicators. DataBank. Retrieved February 17, 2022b from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/education-statistics-%5E-all-indicators#
World Bank (2022a). Indicators. Data. Retrieved February 17, 2022a from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator
Yu, W., & Lee, P. (2013). Decomposing gender beliefs: cross-national differences in attitudes toward maternal employment and gender equality at home. Sociological Inquiry, 83(4), 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12013
Acknowledgements
Thank you to Prof. Rachel Lautenschlager, Prof. Olena Antonaccio, Prof. Amie Nielsen, and Prof. Kathryn Nowotny for their academic guidance.
Funding
This author has no financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. No funds, grants, or other support were received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
See Table 5.
Appendix 2
ICVS EU ICS Questionnaire, 2004–2005
Q80. First, a rather personal question. People sometimes grab, touch or assault others for sexual reasons in a really offensive way. This can happen either at home, or elsewhere, for instance in a pub, the street, at school, on public transport, in cinemas, on the beach, or at one’s workplace. Over the past five years has anyone done this to you? Please take your time to think about it.
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
9.
Don’t know
Q220. You mentioned that you had been a victim of a sexual offense. Could I ask you about this? When did this happen? Was it
-
1.
This year
-
2.
Last year, in 2004
-
3.
Before then
-
9.
Don’t know/can’t remember
If answer is equal to code 2 then continue with question 221.
Else continue with question 222.
Q229. Would you describe the incident as a rape (forced intercourse), an attempted rape, an indecent assault or as just behavior which you found offensive?
-
1.
A rape
-
2.
An attempted rape
-
3.
Indecent assault
-
4.
Offensive behavior
-
9.
Don’t know
Q230. Taking everything into account, how serious was the incident for you? Was it very serious, fairly serious, or not very serious?
-
1.
Very serious
-
2.
Fairly serious
-
3.
Not very serious
-
9.
Don’t know
Q231. Do you regard the incident as a crime?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
9.
Don’t know
Q232. Did you or anyone else report that incident to the police?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
9.
Don’t know
Appendix 3
Items: Gender-Public Equalitarianism
WVS: waves 2 (1990–1994), 3 (1995–1998), and 4 (1999–2000) (Inglehart et al, 2014).
Items asked respondents to which extent they agreed with the statements:
-
1.
“On the whole, men make better political leaders than women do.”
-
2.
“A university education is more important for a boy than for a girl”;
-
3.
“When jobs are scarce, men should have more right to a job than women.”
Appendix 4
Items: Gender-Private Egalitarianism
WVS: wave 2 (1990–1994), 3 (1995–1998), 4 (1999–2000) (Inglehart et al., 2014); when no country observations were available in any of these 3 waves, data from wave 5 were incorporated (2005–2009).
Asked respondents if they approved or disapproved with the following statement:
-
1.
“If a woman wants to have a child as a single parent, but she doesn't want to have a stable relationship with a man, do you approve or disapprove?” (three-points scale).
“Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between”:
-
2.
“Abortion” (ten-point scale);
-
3.
“Divorce” (ten-point scale).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Concha, R. Gender-Egalitarianism and the Construction of Official Rape Rates. Int Criminol 3, 38–51 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-023-00085-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-023-00085-2