Abstract
Austin and Kim (International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 44, 204–221, 2000) tested the relationship between gender equality and rape victimization by employing an international data set. The current study advances Austin and Kim’s (International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 44, 204–221, 2000) work by employing more variables, such as absolute measures of female socioeconomic status and Muslim and Latin American regional indicators. Additionally, the current work utilizes a larger and updated international data set from The United Nations’ Surveys on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems. The results of multiple regression analyses partially support backlash hypotheses, but not the amelioration hypothesis. An interesting finding of this work is that developed countries display a higher level of sexual violence than their developing counterparts, which is inconsistent with the perspective of the civilizing process on violence. Additionally, Muslim countries register lower sexual violence than non-Muslim ones, while Latin American countries exhibit higher sexual violence than non-Latin American ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcalde, C. (2006). Migration and class as constraints in battered women’s attempts to escape violence in Lima, Peru. Latin American Perspectives, 33, 147–164.
Asencio, M. W. (1999). Machos and sluts: gender, sexuality, and violence among a cohort of Puerto Rican adolescents. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 13, 107–126.
Austin, R., & Kim, Y. S. (2000). A cross-national examination of the relationship between gender equality and official rape rate. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 204–221.
Bailey, W. C., & Peterson, R. D. (1995). Gender inequality and violence against women: The case of murder. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 174–205). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Baron, L., & Straus, M. A. (1987). Four theories of rape: a macrosociological analysis. Social Problems, 34, 467–489.
Bennett, R., & Lynch, J. (1990). Does difference make a difference: comparing cross-national crime indicators. Criminology, 8, 153–182.
Blau, J. R., & Blau, P. M. (1982). The costs of inequality: metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review, 47, 114–129.
Brewer, V. E., & Smith, M. D. (1995). Gender inequality and rates of female homicide victimization across U.S. cities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 175–190.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Bantam Books.
Buchart, A., & Engstrom, K. (2002). Sex- and age-specific relations between economic development, economic inequality and homicide rates in people aged 0–24 years: a cross-sectional analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80, 797–805.
Chafetz, J. S. (1984). Sex and advantage: A comparative macro-structural theory of sex stratification. Totowa. NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (2006). Economic inequality, legitimacy, and cross-national homicide rates. Homicide Studies, 10, 231–252.
DeWees, M. A., & Parker, K. F. (2003). The political economy of urban homicide: assessing the relative impact of gender inequality on sex-specific victimization. Violence and Victims, 18, 35–54.
Eisner, M. (2001). Modernization, self-control and lethal violence: the long-term dynamics of European homicide rates in theoretical perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 618–638.
Ellis, L., & Beattie, C. (1983). The feminist explanation for rape: an empirical test. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 74–93.
Eschholz, S., & Vieraitis, L. M. (2004). Race-specific gender equality and rape: a further test of feminist hypotheses. Critical Criminology, 12, 195–219.
Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loayza, N. (1998). Determinants of crime rates in Latin America and the world: An empirical Assessment. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Gartner, R. (1990). The victims of homicide: a temporal and cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 55, 92–106.
Gartner, R. (1995). Methodological issues in cross-cultural large-survey on violence. In R. B. Ruback & N. A. Weiner (Eds.), Interpersonal violent behaviors: Social and cultural aspects (pp. 7–24). New York: Springer.
Gartner, R., Baker, K., & Pampel, F. C. (1990). Gender stratification and the gender gap in homicide victimization. Social Problems, 37, 593–612.
Gillis, A. R. (1994). Literacy and the civilization of violence in 19th-century France. Sociological Forum, 9, 371–401.
Groves, B. W., Newman, G., & Corrado, C. (1987). Islam, modernization, and world crime. Comparative Social Research, 8, 59–78.
Helal, A. A., & Coston, C. T. (1991). Low crime rates in Bahrain: Islamic social control-testing the theory of synnomie. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 15, 125–144.
Hillbrand, M. (2001). Homicide-suicide and other forms of co-occurring aggression against self and against others. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 32, 626–635.
Howard, D., Hume, M., & Oslender, U. (2007). Violence, fear, and development in Latin America: a critical overview. Development in Practice, 17, 713–724.
ICVS International Working Group. (2012). International crime victimization survey (ICVS) series. Retrieved from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/175
Kalish, C. (1988). International crime rates. Washington, DC: The US Government Printing Office.
Kick, E., & LaFree, G. (1985). Development and the social context of murder and theft. Comparative Social Research, 8, 37–58.
Krohn, M., & Wellford, C. (1977). A static and dynamic analysis of crime and the primary dimensions of nations. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 5, 1–16.
Martin, K., Vieraitis, L. M., & Britto, S. (2006). Gender equality and women’s absolute status: a test of the feminist models of rape. Violence Against Women, 12, 321–339.
Mohammad, N. K. (1991). The influence of the application of Shariy’a on crime and public security: The Sudan case. Durham: Ph.D. dissertation, University of Durham.
Moniruzzaman, S., & Anderson, R. (2005). Age-and sex-specific analysis of homicide mortality as a function of economic development: a cross-national comparison. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 33, 464–471.
Nadanovsky, P., & Cunha-Cruz, J. (2009). The relative contribution of income inequality and imprisonment to the variation in homicide rates among developed (OECD), South and Central American countries. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 1343–1350.
Neapolitan, J. L. (1994). Cross-national variation in homicide: the case of Latin America. International Criminal Justice Review, 4, 4–22.
Neapolitan, J. L. (2003). Explaining variation in crime victimization across nations and within nations. International Criminal Justice Review, 13, 76–89.
O’Brien, R. M., & Stockard, J. (2006). A common explanation for the changing age distributions of suicide and homicide in the United States, 1930 to 2000. Social Forces, 84, 1539–1557.
Peterson, R. D., & Bailey, W. C. (1992). Rape and dimensions of gender socioeconomic inequality in U.S. Metropolitan areas. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 162–177.
Pizarro, J. M., DeJong, C., & McGarrell, E. F. (2010). An examination of the coverage of female homicide victimization and offending. Feminist Criminology, 5, 51–72.
Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: a cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41, 611–643.
Russell, D. E. H. (1975). The politics of rape: The victim’s perspective. New York: Stein and Day.
Schwendinger, J. H., & Schwendinger, H. (1983). Rape and inequality. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Serajzadeh, S. H. (2001–2002). Islam and crime: the moral community of Muslims. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies, 4, 111–131.
Smith, M. D., & Brewer, V. E. (1995). Female status and the “gender gap” in U.S. homicide victimization. Violence Against Women, 1, 339–350.
Stamatel, J. P. (2009). Correlates of national-level homicide variation in post-communist East-central Europe. Social Forces, 87, 1423–1448.
Stanko, E. A. (1985). Women, crime, and fear. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 539, 46–58.
Stark, R., Kent, L., & Doyle, D. (1982). Religion and delinquency: the ecology of lost relationship. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19, 4–24.
Straus, M. A. (1973). A general systems theory approach to a theory of violence between family members. Social Science Information, 12, 105–125.
Straus, M. A. (1994). State-to-state differences in social inequality and social bonds in relation to assaults on wives in the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 25, 7–24.
Sugarman, D. B., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Indicators of gender equality for American states and regions. Social Indicators Research, 20, 229–270.
The United Nations Development Program (2001–2005). Human development report. Retrieved February 15, 2010, from website: http://www.undo.org.
The United Nations. (2003–2005). Demographic yearbook. Statistical Office.
The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2012). Total sexual violence a national level, number of police-recorded offenses. Retrieved May 7, 20012, from http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime.html
Vieraitis, L. M., & Williams, M. R. (2002). Assessing the impact of gender inequality on female homicide victimization across U.S. cities: racially disaggregated analysis. Violence Against Women, 8, 35–63.
Vieraitis, L. M., Britto, S., & Kovandzic, T. V. (2007). The impact of women’s status and gender inequality on female homicide victimization rates: Evidence from U.S. counties. Feminist Criminology, 2, 57–73.
Vollum, S., & Titterington, V. B. (2001). Gender, attributional styles, and direction of lethal violence. Homicide Studies, 5, 227–252.
Whaley, R. B. (2001). The paradoxical relationship between gender inequality and rape: toward a refined theory. Gender and Society, 15, 531–555.
Whaley, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2002). Gender equality and gendered homicides. Homicide Studies, 6, 188–210.
World Almanac Book. (2010). The world almanac and book of facts. New York: Infobase Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chon, D.S. Test of Impacts of Gender Equality and Economic Development on Sexual Violence. J Fam Viol 28, 603–610 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9523-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9523-z