Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association patterns between lumbar paraspinal muscles and sagittal malalignment in preoperative patients undergoing lumbar three-column osteotomy

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aim to investigate the associations between lumbar paraspinal muscles and sagittal malalignment in patients undergoing lumbar three-column osteotomy.

Methods

Patients undergoing three-column osteotomy between 2016 and 2021 with preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and whole spine radiographs in the standing position were included. Muscle measurements were obtained using a validated custom software for segmentation and muscle evaluation to calculate the functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) and percent fat infiltration (FI) of the m. psoas major (PM) as well as the m. erector spinae (ES) and m. multifidus (MM). Spinopelvic measurements included pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), L1–S1 lordosis (LL), T4–12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), spino-sacral angle (SSA), C7–S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and PI–LL mismatch (PI − LL). Statistics were performed using multivariable linear regressions adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI).

Results

A total of 77 patients (n = 40 female, median age 64 years, median BMI 27.9 kg/m2) were analyzed. After adjusting for age, sex and BMI, regression analyses demonstrated that a greater fCSA of the ES was significantly associated with greater SS and SSA. Moreover, our results showed a significant correlation between a greater FI of the ES and a greater kyphosis of TK.

Conclusion

This study included a large patient cohort with sagittal alignment undergoing three-column osteotomy and is the first to demonstrate significant associations between the lumbar paraspinal muscle parameters and global sagittal alignment. Our findings emphasize the importance of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in sagittal malalignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A (2019) Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 28:1889–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith JS, Klineberg E, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Moal B, Ames CP, Hostin R, Fu K-MG, Burton D, Akbarnia B, Gupta M, Hart R, Bess S, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2013) Change in classification grade by the SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures: prospective analysis of operative and nonoperative treatment. Spine 38:1663–1671. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ec563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Devos P, Ames CP, Fu K-MG, Burton D, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Gupta M, Deviren V, Mundis G, Hart R, Bess S, Lafage V (2013) The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 73:559–568. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abelin-Genevois K (2021) Sagittal balance of the spine. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107:102769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ochtman AEA, Kruyt MC, Jacobs WCH, Kersten RFMR, le Huec JC, Öner FC, van Gaalen SM (2020) Surgical restoration of sagittal alignment of the spine: correlation with improved patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBJS Rev 8:e19.00100. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berjano P, Aebi M (2015) Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the lumbar spine for sagittal deformities. Eur Spine J 24:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3670-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta MC, Gupta S, Kelly MP, Bridwell KH (2020) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 10:e0028. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00028

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Le Huec JC, Charosky S, Barrey C, Rigal J, Aunoble S (2011) Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment. Eur Spine J 20:699–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1938-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yagi M, Hosogane N, Watanabe K, Asazuma T, Matsumoto M (2016) The paravertebral muscle and psoas for the maintenance of global spinal alignment in patient with degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine J 16:451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim WJ, Shin HM, Lee JS, Song DG, Lee JW, Chang SH, Park KY, Choy WS (2021) Sarcopenia and back muscle degeneration as risk factors for degenerative adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance and degenerative spinal disease: a comparative study. World Neurosurg 148:e547–e555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muellner M, Haffer H, Moser M, Chiapparelli E, Dodo Y, Adl Amini D, Carrino JA, Tan ET, Shue J, Zhu J, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP (2022) Paraspinal musculature impairment is associated with spinopelvic and spinal malalignment in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. Spine J 22:2006–2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Marty C, Hecquet J (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Duval-Beaupère G, Schmidt C, Cosson P (1992) A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20:451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02368136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Diebo BG, Ferrero E, Lafage R, Challier V, Liabaud B, Liu S, Vital J-M, Errico TJ, Schwab FJ, Lafage V (2015) Recruitment of compensatory mechanisms in sagittal spinal malalignment is age and regional deformity dependent: a full-standing axis analysis of key radiographical parameters. Spine 40:642–649. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16:1459–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0294-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Ryan DJ, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Errico T, Lafage V (2014) The T1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Jt Surg 96:1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crawford RJ, Filli L, Elliott JM, Nanz D, Fischer MA, Marcon M, Ulbrich EJ (2016) Age- and level-dependence of fatty infiltration in lumbar paravertebral muscles of healthy volunteers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:742–748. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Faron A, Luetkens JA, Schmeel FC, Kuetting DLR, Thomas D, Sprinkart AM (2019) Quantification of fat and skeletal muscle tissue at abdominal computed tomography: associations between single-slice measurements and total compartment volumes. Abdom Radiol 44:1907–1916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01912-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moser M, Adl Amini D, Jones C, Zhu J, Okano I, Oezel L, Chiapparelli E, Tan ET, Shue J, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP (2022) The predictive value of psoas and paraspinal muscle parameters measured on MRI for severe cage subsidence after standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, Danneels L, Willard FH (2012) The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat 221:537–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01564.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Creze M, Soubeyrand M, Gagey O (2019) The paraspinal muscle-tendon system: Its paradoxical anatomy. PLoS ONE 14:e0214812. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanneuville G, Garcier J, Poumarat G, Guillot M, Chazal J (1992) Mechanisms of orientation of the pelvifemoral base during static loading of the lumbar spine in weight-lifters. Surg Radiol Anat 14:29–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01628040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G (2005) Sagittal plane alignment of the spine and gravity: a radiological and clinical evaluation. Acta Orthop Belg 71:213–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park J-S, Park Y-S, Kim J, Hur J, Choe D-H (2020) Sarcopenia and fatty degeneration of paraspinal muscle associated with increased sagittal vertical axis in the elderly: a cross-sectional study in 71 female patients. Eur Spine J 29:1353–1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06416-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shafaq N, Suzuki A, Matsumura A, Terai H, Toyoda H, Yasuda H, Ibrahim M, Nakamura H (2012) Asymmetric degeneration of paravertebral muscles in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine 37:1398–1406. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824c767e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaikh N, Zhang H, Brown SHM, Lari H, Lasry O, Street J, Wilson DR, Oxland T (2021) Synchronous imaging of pelvic geometry and muscle morphometry: a pilot study of pelvic retroversion using upright MRI. Sci Rep 11:20127. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99305-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Stradiotti P, Curti A, Castellazzi G, Zerbi A (2009) Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art. Eur Spine J 18:102–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0998-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Slattery C, Verma K (2018) Classification in brief: SRS-Schwab classification of adult spinal deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:1890–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000264

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: TC, DD, TZ, AS, FC, FG, AH. Acquisition of data: TC, SM, AA, EC, LS, ST, GC, JZ. Analysis and interpretation of data: TC, SM, AA, EC, LS, ST, GC, JZ, DD, TZ, AS, FC, FG, AH. Drafting the article article: TC, SM, AA, EC, LS, ST, GC, JZ, DD. Critically revising the article: TC, SM, AA, EC, LS, ST, GC, JZ, DD, TZ, AS, FC, FG, AH. Preparation of graphical content: TC, SM, AA. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: TC, SM, AA, EC, LS, ST, GC, JZ, DD, TZ, AS, FC, FG, AH. Approved the final version of the manuscript: TC, SM, AA, EC, LS, ST, GC, JZ, DD, TZ, AS, FC, FG, AH. Statistical analysis: TC, LS, JZ. Administrative/technical/material support: TC, SM, AA, EC, LS, ST, GC, JZ, DD, TZ, AS, FC, FG, AH. Study supervision: AH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander P. Hughes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Sama reports royalties from Ortho Development, Corp.; private investments for Vestia Ventures MiRUS Investment, LLC, IVY II, LLC, ISPH II, LLC, ISPH 3, LLC, HS2, LLC, HSS ASC Development Network, LLC, and Centinel Spine (Vbros Venture Partners V); consulting fee from Depuy Synthes Products, Inc., Clariance, Inc., Kuros Biosciences AG, Ortho Development Corp., Medical Device Business Service, Inc.; speaking and teaching arrangements of DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.; membership of scientific advisory board of Depuy Synthes Products, Inc., Clariance, Inc., and Kuros Biosciences AG; Medical Device Business Service, Inc.and trips/travel of Medical Device Business; research support from Spinal Kinetics, Inc., outside the submitted work. Dr. Cammisa reports royalties from NuVasive, Inc. Accelus; ownership interest for 4WEB Medical/4WEB, Inc.; Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP; ISPH II, LLC; ISPH 3 Holdings, LLC; Ivy Healthcare Capital Partners, LLC; Medical Device Partners II, LLC; Medical Device Partners III, LLC; Orthobond Corporation; Spine Biopharma, LLC; Tissue Differentiation Intelligence, LLC; VBVP VI, LLC; VBVP X, LLC; Woven Orthopedics Technologies; consulting fees from 4WEB Medical/4WEB, Inc., DePuy Synthes, NuVasive, Inc., Spine Biopharma, LLC, and Synexis, LLC, Accelus; membership of scientific advisory board/other office of Healthpoint Capital Partners, Medical Device Partners II, LLC, Orthobond Corporation, Spine Biopharma, LLC, and Woven Orthopedic Technologies; and research support from 4WEB Medical/4WEB, Inc., Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Camber Spine, and Centinel Spine, outside the submitted work. Dr. Girardi reports royalties from Lanx, Inc., and Ortho Development Corp.; private investments for BCIMD; and stock ownership of Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP, outside the submitted work. Dr. Hughes reports research support from Kuros Biosciences AG and fellowship support from NuVasive, Inc. and Kuros Biosciences BV, outside the submitted work. The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

Ethical approval

The investigation was approved by the institutional review board. IRB#2019-2137.

Consent to participate and publish

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caffard, T., Medina, S.J., Arzani, A. et al. Association patterns between lumbar paraspinal muscles and sagittal malalignment in preoperative patients undergoing lumbar three-column osteotomy. Spine Deform 12, 801–809 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00828-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00828-9

Keywords

Navigation