Abstract
The US has a considerable length of unpaved secondary roads experiencing relatively low daily traffic volume. To maintain such roads, the US county secondary road departments spend millions of funds annually for aggregate replacement alone. Meanwhile, Otta seal has been reported as a low-cost bituminous surface treatment (BST) and dust mitigation technique. In consideration of its limited use in the US, Otta seal could be compared with chip seal, which is a commonly used BST in the US, from an economic viability perspective. In this study, through using the Minnesota case, a life-cycle cost analysis was conducted at two levels: (I) deterministic life-cycle cost analysis and (II) stochastic life-cycle cost analysis. Based on the analysis results, it was concluded that the Otta seal could potentially be an economic viable BST, and public agencies could use it to reduce maintenance cost of low-volume roads, especially when gaining access to uniformly graded aggregate, which is commonly not feasible for chip seal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.M. Newman, W.F. Casey, Transportation System Preservation Research, Development, and Implementation Roadmap, (2008).
J.L. Lee, D.H. Chen, T. Ishikawa, Sustainability on pavement engineering, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 9 (2016) 403–404.
C. Overbay, A Guide to the Use of Otta Seals, Oslo, Norway, 1999.
C. Overby, M.I. Pinard, Otta seal surfacing: practical and economic alternative to traditional bituminous surface treatments, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board., 2349(1) (2013) 136–144.
G. Johnson, Minnesota’s Experience with Thin Bituminous Treatments for Low-Volume Roads, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board., 1819 (2003) 333–337.
K. Skorseth, South Dakota Experience in Constructing Alternatives to Paved Surfaces on Local Roads and Streets 2013 APWA Congress Chicago, IL, (2013).
G. Johnson, Minnesota’s Experience with Thin Bituminous Treatments for Low-Volume Roads, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 1819 (2003) 333–337.
C. Overby, M. Pinard, Development of an Economic and Practical Alternative to Traditional Bituminous Surface Treatments, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 1989 (2007) 226–233.
C. Overby, M. Pinard, Otta Seal Surfacing, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2349 (2013) 136–144.
M. Pinard, Need for Effective Technology Transfer to Ensure Sustainability of Otta Seal, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2349 (2013) 129–135.
H. Zhang, M. D. Lepech, G. A. Keoleian, S. Qian, and V. C. Li. Dynamic Life-Cycle Modeling of Pavement Overlay Systems: Capturing the Impacts of Users, Const. Roadway Deterioration 16 (2010) 299–309.
T. Cesar, K. Gamez-Rios, A. Fathi, M. Mazari, S. Nazarian, Simulation of Lightweight Deflectometer Measurements Considering Nonlinear Behavior of Geomaterials., Transp. Res. Rec. 2641 (2017) 58–65.
S. Mohsen Haeri and Aria Fathi, Numerical Modeling of Rocking of Shallow Foundations Subjected to Slow Cyclic Loading with Consideration of Soil-Structure Interaction, Fifth Int. Conf. Geotech. Constr. Mater. Environ., 2015, ID No. 5186.
D.D. Gransberg, J. Diekmann, Quantifying Pavement Life Cycle Cost Inflation Uncertainty, AACE Inter. Trans. (2004) RI81–RI811
D.D. Gransberg, E.J. Kelly, Quantifying Uncertainty of Constrnction Material Price Volatility Using Monte Carlo, Cost Eng. 50 (2008) 14.
D.D. Gransberg, E. Scheepbouwer, Infrastructure asset life cycle cost analysis issues, in: 54th Annu. Meet. Am. Assoc. Cost Eng. Int. 2010, Washington D.C, 2010 237–246.
A. Daghighi, A. Nahvi, Effect of different additives on fatigue behaviour of asphalt mixtures, in: First Int. Conf. Constr. Mater. Struct., IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2014 601–607.
J. Walls III, S. Smith. R, Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design-interim technical bulletin., 1998.
P. Babashamsi, N.I. Md Yusoff, H. Ceylan, N.G. Md Nor, H. Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, Evaluation of pavement life cycle cost analysis: Review and analysis, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 9 (2016) 241–254.
O. Salem, S. AbouRizk, S. Ariaratnam, Risk-based Life-cycle Costing of Infrastructure Rehabilitation and Construction Alternatives, J. Infrastruct. Syst. 9 (2003) 6–15.
A.A. Amini, M. Mashayekhi, H. Ziari, N. Shams, Life cycle cost comparison of highways with perpetual and conventional pavements, Int. J. Pavement Eng. 13 (2012) 553–568.
A. Ferreira, J. Santos, Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level: sensitivity analysis to the discount rate, Int. J. Pavement Eng. 14 (2013) 655–673.
D. Pittenger, D. Gransberg, M. Zaman, C. Riemer, Stochastic Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement Preservation Treatments, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2292 (2012) 45–51.
S. Tighe, Guidelines for Probabilistic Pavement Life Cycle Cost Analysis, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 1769 (2001) 28–38.
A. Abdelaty, D. Jeong, B. Dannen, Enhancing life cycle cost analysis with a novel cost classification framework for pavement rehabilitation projects, Constr. Manag. Econ. 10 (2016) 724–736.
P. Anand, A. Nahvi, H. Ceylan, D. Pyrialakou, K. Gkritza, S. Kim, P.C. Taylor, Energy and Financial Viability of Hydronic Heated Pavement Systems, 2017.
S. Sri, Hexcrete Tower for Harvesting Wind Energy at Taller Hub Heights, 2017.
A. Nahvi, S.M.S. Sadati, K. Cetin, H. Ceylan, A. Sassani, S. Kim, Towards resilient infrastructure systems for winter weather events: Integrated stochastic economic evaluation of electrically conductive heated airfield pavements, Sustain. Cities Soc. 41 (2018) 195–204.
J. Reigle, J. Zaniewski, Risk-Based Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Project-Level Pavement Management, Transp. Res. Rec. 1816 (2002) 34–12.
A. Touran, E.P. Wiser, Monte Carlo technique with correlated random variables, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 118 (1992) 258–272.
R. Flanagan, A. Kendell, G. Norman, G.D. Robinson, Life cycle costing and risk management, Constr. Manag. Econ. 4 (1987) S53–S71.
D.D. Batioja-alvarez, S. Kazemi, E.Y. Hajj, R. V Siddharthan, A.J.T. Hand, Probabilistic Mechanistic-Based Pavement Damage Costs for Multitrip Overweight Vehicles, 144 (2018).
G. Peshkin, D., E. Hoerner, A. Zimmerman, Optimal Timing of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Treatment Applications, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C, 2004.
R. Nemati, E. V Dave, Nominal property based predictive models for asphalt mixture complex modulus (dynamic modulus and phase angle) Nominal property based predictive models for asphalt mixture complex modulus (dynamic modulus and phase angle), Constr. Build. Mater. 158 (2018) 308–319.
A. Nahvi, Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) Analysis of hexcrete wind towers, Iowa State University, 2017.
S. Sritharan, Hexcrete Tower for Harvesting Wind Energy at Taller Hub Heights Sri Sritharan, DOE-ISU-06737-1 (2017).
C. Mone, M. Hand, M. Bolinger, J. Rand, D. Heimiller, J. Ho, 2015 Cost of Wind Energy Review NREL/TP-6A20-66861, 2015.
K.J. Shrestha, H.D. Jeong, D.D. Gransberg, Multidimensional Highway Construction Cost Indexes Using Dynamic Item Basket, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 143 (2017) 04017036.
FHWA, Asset Management Overview, Off. Asset Management, Washington D.C., 2007.
H. Ceylan, S. Kim, Y. Zhang, A. Nahvi, S. Gushgari, C.T. Jahren, K. Gopalakrishnan, D.D. Gransberg, A. Arabzadeh, Evaluation of Otta Seal Surfacing for Low-Volume Roads in Iowa, 2018.
D.D. Gransberg, Evaluate TxDOT Chip Seal Binder Performance Using Pavement Management Information System and Field Measurement Data, Univ. of Oklahoma Trasp. Res. Report, Norman, OK (2008).
D.D. Gransberg, Using a New Zealand Performance Specification to Evaluate U.S. Chip Seal Performance, J. Transp. Eng. 133 (2007) 688–695.
D.D. Gransberg, D.M.B. James, Chip Seal Best Practices, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C, 2005.
J.S. Daniel, M. Corrigan, C. Jacques, R. Nemati, E. V Dave, A. Congalton, J. Sias, M. Corrigan, C. Jacques, R. Nemati, Comparison of asphalt mixture specimen fabrication methods and binder tests for cracking evaluation of field mixtures, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 0 (2018) 1–17.
FHWA Pavement Division, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design, Distribution. (1998) 107.
Federal Rserve, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Fed. Reserv. Syst. (2018). (accessed January 22, 2018).
Bid Express, Bid Express, (2018). https://doi.org/www.bidx.com/site/static?page=services#basic (accessed November 9, 2017).
F.M. Tehrani, Engineer’s estimate reliability and statistical characteristics of bids, Cogent Eng. 3, Federal Rserve, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Fed. Reserv. Syst, 2018. https://doi.org/www.frbdiscountwindow.org/pages/discount-rates/historical-discount-rates (accessed January 22, 2018).
Commodity Data Database, Producer Price Index. U.S., U.S. Bur. Labor Stat. (n.d.). doi: https://doi.org/www.bls.gov/data/#prices.
Engineering News Record, Construction Economics: Market Conditions in Construction, (2018) 1–53.
J. Santos, A. Ferreira, Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level, Int. J. Pavement Eng. 14 (2013) 71–84.
Bid Letting, Minnesota Dep. Transp. (n.d.). (accessed November 10, 2017).
K. Pearson, On the Criterion that a Given System of Deviations from the Probable in the Case of a Correlated System of Variables is Such that it Can be Reasonably Supposed to have Arisen from Random Sampling, in: Break. Stat., Springer, New York, NY, 1992.
S. Gushgari, Y. Zhang, A. Nahvi, H. Ceylan, S. Kim, Otta Seal Construction for Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing, in: Int. Conf. Transp. Dev. 2018, 2018 177.
D. Frenkel, Monte Carlo Simulations, Comput. Model. Fluids Polym. Solids. (1990) 83–123.
R. Boddy, G. Smith, Statistical Methods in Practice: For Scientists and Technologists, John Wiley and Sons, United Kingdom, 2009.
A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, K. Chan, A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output, Technometrics. 41 (1999) 39–56.
A. Fathi, M. Mazari, M. Saghafi, Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis of Rocking Responses of Shallow Foundations under Controlled Rocking, in: Eighth Int. Conf. Case Hist. Geotech. Eng. Geo-Congress, ASCE., Orlando, FL. (2018)
A. Fathi, M. Mazari, M. Saghafi, Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis of Rocking Responses of Shallow Foundations under Controlled Rocking, in: Eighth Int. Conf. Case Hist. Geotech. Eng. Geo-Congress, ASCE., Orlando, FL. 2018.
B. Iooss, P. Lemaître, A review on global sensitivity analysis methods, Uncertain. Manag. Simulation-Optimization Complex Syst. Algorithms Appl. (2014) 23.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the sponsorship for this research study from the Iowa Highway Research Board (TR-674). The project technical advisory committee members, Paul Assman, Brandon Billings, Lee Bjerke, Scott Cline, Zach Gunsolley, Brian Keierleber, James D. King, Todd Kinney, Patrick Mouw, Joshua Sebern, David Shanahan, Danny Waid, Vanessa Goetz, Francis Todey, and Jeff Williams are gratefully acknowledged for their guidance, support, and direction throughout the research. Technical guidance from Charles Øverby, chief engineer for Norwegian Public Roads, is sincerely appreciated. Troy Drath from Winona County Engineers Office, Minnesota is acknowledged for his generous help and sharing of information and experience. The authors would also like to sincerely thank Robert F. Steffes, research engineer at Iowa State University’s Institute for Transportation (InTrans).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nahvi, A., Zhang, Y., Arabzadeh, A. et al. Deterministic and stochastic life-cycle cost analysis for Otta seal surface treatment on low volume roads. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 12, 101–109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0013-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0013-4