Skip to main content
Log in

Deterministic and stochastic life-cycle cost analysis for Otta seal surface treatment on low volume roads

  • Published:
International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The US has a considerable length of unpaved secondary roads experiencing relatively low daily traffic volume. To maintain such roads, the US county secondary road departments spend millions of funds annually for aggregate replacement alone. Meanwhile, Otta seal has been reported as a low-cost bituminous surface treatment (BST) and dust mitigation technique. In consideration of its limited use in the US, Otta seal could be compared with chip seal, which is a commonly used BST in the US, from an economic viability perspective. In this study, through using the Minnesota case, a life-cycle cost analysis was conducted at two levels: (I) deterministic life-cycle cost analysis and (II) stochastic life-cycle cost analysis. Based on the analysis results, it was concluded that the Otta seal could potentially be an economic viable BST, and public agencies could use it to reduce maintenance cost of low-volume roads, especially when gaining access to uniformly graded aggregate, which is commonly not feasible for chip seal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.M. Newman, W.F. Casey, Transportation System Preservation Research, Development, and Implementation Roadmap, (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.L. Lee, D.H. Chen, T. Ishikawa, Sustainability on pavement engineering, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 9 (2016) 403–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Overbay, A Guide to the Use of Otta Seals, Oslo, Norway, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Overby, M.I. Pinard, Otta seal surfacing: practical and economic alternative to traditional bituminous surface treatments, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board., 2349(1) (2013) 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Johnson, Minnesota’s Experience with Thin Bituminous Treatments for Low-Volume Roads, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board., 1819 (2003) 333–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Skorseth, South Dakota Experience in Constructing Alternatives to Paved Surfaces on Local Roads and Streets 2013 APWA Congress Chicago, IL, (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Johnson, Minnesota’s Experience with Thin Bituminous Treatments for Low-Volume Roads, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 1819 (2003) 333–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Overby, M. Pinard, Development of an Economic and Practical Alternative to Traditional Bituminous Surface Treatments, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 1989 (2007) 226–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Overby, M. Pinard, Otta Seal Surfacing, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2349 (2013) 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Pinard, Need for Effective Technology Transfer to Ensure Sustainability of Otta Seal, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2349 (2013) 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Zhang, M. D. Lepech, G. A. Keoleian, S. Qian, and V. C. Li. Dynamic Life-Cycle Modeling of Pavement Overlay Systems: Capturing the Impacts of Users, Const. Roadway Deterioration 16 (2010) 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Cesar, K. Gamez-Rios, A. Fathi, M. Mazari, S. Nazarian, Simulation of Lightweight Deflectometer Measurements Considering Nonlinear Behavior of Geomaterials., Transp. Res. Rec. 2641 (2017) 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Mohsen Haeri and Aria Fathi, Numerical Modeling of Rocking of Shallow Foundations Subjected to Slow Cyclic Loading with Consideration of Soil-Structure Interaction, Fifth Int. Conf. Geotech. Constr. Mater. Environ., 2015, ID No. 5186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.D. Gransberg, J. Diekmann, Quantifying Pavement Life Cycle Cost Inflation Uncertainty, AACE Inter. Trans. (2004) RI81–RI811

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.D. Gransberg, E.J. Kelly, Quantifying Uncertainty of Constrnction Material Price Volatility Using Monte Carlo, Cost Eng. 50 (2008) 14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.D. Gransberg, E. Scheepbouwer, Infrastructure asset life cycle cost analysis issues, in: 54th Annu. Meet. Am. Assoc. Cost Eng. Int. 2010, Washington D.C, 2010 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Daghighi, A. Nahvi, Effect of different additives on fatigue behaviour of asphalt mixtures, in: First Int. Conf. Constr. Mater. Struct., IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2014 601–607.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Walls III, S. Smith. R, Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design-interim technical bulletin., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Babashamsi, N.I. Md Yusoff, H. Ceylan, N.G. Md Nor, H. Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, Evaluation of pavement life cycle cost analysis: Review and analysis, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 9 (2016) 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. O. Salem, S. AbouRizk, S. Ariaratnam, Risk-based Life-cycle Costing of Infrastructure Rehabilitation and Construction Alternatives, J. Infrastruct. Syst. 9 (2003) 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A.A. Amini, M. Mashayekhi, H. Ziari, N. Shams, Life cycle cost comparison of highways with perpetual and conventional pavements, Int. J. Pavement Eng. 13 (2012) 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Ferreira, J. Santos, Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level: sensitivity analysis to the discount rate, Int. J. Pavement Eng. 14 (2013) 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Pittenger, D. Gransberg, M. Zaman, C. Riemer, Stochastic Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement Preservation Treatments, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2292 (2012) 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Tighe, Guidelines for Probabilistic Pavement Life Cycle Cost Analysis, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 1769 (2001) 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Abdelaty, D. Jeong, B. Dannen, Enhancing life cycle cost analysis with a novel cost classification framework for pavement rehabilitation projects, Constr. Manag. Econ. 10 (2016) 724–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Anand, A. Nahvi, H. Ceylan, D. Pyrialakou, K. Gkritza, S. Kim, P.C. Taylor, Energy and Financial Viability of Hydronic Heated Pavement Systems, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Sri, Hexcrete Tower for Harvesting Wind Energy at Taller Hub Heights, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Nahvi, S.M.S. Sadati, K. Cetin, H. Ceylan, A. Sassani, S. Kim, Towards resilient infrastructure systems for winter weather events: Integrated stochastic economic evaluation of electrically conductive heated airfield pavements, Sustain. Cities Soc. 41 (2018) 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Reigle, J. Zaniewski, Risk-Based Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Project-Level Pavement Management, Transp. Res. Rec. 1816 (2002) 34–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Touran, E.P. Wiser, Monte Carlo technique with correlated random variables, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 118 (1992) 258–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R. Flanagan, A. Kendell, G. Norman, G.D. Robinson, Life cycle costing and risk management, Constr. Manag. Econ. 4 (1987) S53–S71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. D.D. Batioja-alvarez, S. Kazemi, E.Y. Hajj, R. V Siddharthan, A.J.T. Hand, Probabilistic Mechanistic-Based Pavement Damage Costs for Multitrip Overweight Vehicles, 144 (2018).

  33. G. Peshkin, D., E. Hoerner, A. Zimmerman, Optimal Timing of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Treatment Applications, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. Nemati, E. V Dave, Nominal property based predictive models for asphalt mixture complex modulus (dynamic modulus and phase angle) Nominal property based predictive models for asphalt mixture complex modulus (dynamic modulus and phase angle), Constr. Build. Mater. 158 (2018) 308–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. A. Nahvi, Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) Analysis of hexcrete wind towers, Iowa State University, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. Sritharan, Hexcrete Tower for Harvesting Wind Energy at Taller Hub Heights Sri Sritharan, DOE-ISU-06737-1 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. Mone, M. Hand, M. Bolinger, J. Rand, D. Heimiller, J. Ho, 2015 Cost of Wind Energy Review NREL/TP-6A20-66861, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  38. K.J. Shrestha, H.D. Jeong, D.D. Gransberg, Multidimensional Highway Construction Cost Indexes Using Dynamic Item Basket, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 143 (2017) 04017036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. FHWA, Asset Management Overview, Off. Asset Management, Washington D.C., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  40. H. Ceylan, S. Kim, Y. Zhang, A. Nahvi, S. Gushgari, C.T. Jahren, K. Gopalakrishnan, D.D. Gransberg, A. Arabzadeh, Evaluation of Otta Seal Surfacing for Low-Volume Roads in Iowa, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  41. D.D. Gransberg, Evaluate TxDOT Chip Seal Binder Performance Using Pavement Management Information System and Field Measurement Data, Univ. of Oklahoma Trasp. Res. Report, Norman, OK (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  42. D.D. Gransberg, Using a New Zealand Performance Specification to Evaluate U.S. Chip Seal Performance, J. Transp. Eng. 133 (2007) 688–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. D.D. Gransberg, D.M.B. James, Chip Seal Best Practices, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J.S. Daniel, M. Corrigan, C. Jacques, R. Nemati, E. V Dave, A. Congalton, J. Sias, M. Corrigan, C. Jacques, R. Nemati, Comparison of asphalt mixture specimen fabrication methods and binder tests for cracking evaluation of field mixtures, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 0 (2018) 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. FHWA Pavement Division, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design, Distribution. (1998) 107.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Federal Rserve, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Fed. Reserv. Syst. (2018). (accessed January 22, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bid Express, Bid Express, (2018). https://doi.org/www.bidx.com/site/static?page=services#basic (accessed November 9, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. F.M. Tehrani, Engineer’s estimate reliability and statistical characteristics of bids, Cogent Eng. 3, Federal Rserve, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Fed. Reserv. Syst, 2018. https://doi.org/www.frbdiscountwindow.org/pages/discount-rates/historical-discount-rates (accessed January 22, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Commodity Data Database, Producer Price Index. U.S., U.S. Bur. Labor Stat. (n.d.). doi: https://doi.org/www.bls.gov/data/#prices.

  50. Engineering News Record, Construction Economics: Market Conditions in Construction, (2018) 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. Santos, A. Ferreira, Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level, Int. J. Pavement Eng. 14 (2013) 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bid Letting, Minnesota Dep. Transp. (n.d.). (accessed November 10, 2017).

  53. K. Pearson, On the Criterion that a Given System of Deviations from the Probable in the Case of a Correlated System of Variables is Such that it Can be Reasonably Supposed to have Arisen from Random Sampling, in: Break. Stat., Springer, New York, NY, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  54. S. Gushgari, Y. Zhang, A. Nahvi, H. Ceylan, S. Kim, Otta Seal Construction for Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing, in: Int. Conf. Transp. Dev. 2018, 2018 177.

    Google Scholar 

  55. D. Frenkel, Monte Carlo Simulations, Comput. Model. Fluids Polym. Solids. (1990) 83–123.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. R. Boddy, G. Smith, Statistical Methods in Practice: For Scientists and Technologists, John Wiley and Sons, United Kingdom, 2009.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, K. Chan, A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output, Technometrics. 41 (1999) 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. A. Fathi, M. Mazari, M. Saghafi, Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis of Rocking Responses of Shallow Foundations under Controlled Rocking, in: Eighth Int. Conf. Case Hist. Geotech. Eng. Geo-Congress, ASCE., Orlando, FL. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  59. A. Fathi, M. Mazari, M. Saghafi, Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis of Rocking Responses of Shallow Foundations under Controlled Rocking, in: Eighth Int. Conf. Case Hist. Geotech. Eng. Geo-Congress, ASCE., Orlando, FL. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  60. B. Iooss, P. Lemaître, A review on global sensitivity analysis methods, Uncertain. Manag. Simulation-Optimization Complex Syst. Algorithms Appl. (2014) 23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the sponsorship for this research study from the Iowa Highway Research Board (TR-674). The project technical advisory committee members, Paul Assman, Brandon Billings, Lee Bjerke, Scott Cline, Zach Gunsolley, Brian Keierleber, James D. King, Todd Kinney, Patrick Mouw, Joshua Sebern, David Shanahan, Danny Waid, Vanessa Goetz, Francis Todey, and Jeff Williams are gratefully acknowledged for their guidance, support, and direction throughout the research. Technical guidance from Charles Øverby, chief engineer for Norwegian Public Roads, is sincerely appreciated. Troy Drath from Winona County Engineers Office, Minnesota is acknowledged for his generous help and sharing of information and experience. The authors would also like to sincerely thank Robert F. Steffes, research engineer at Iowa State University’s Institute for Transportation (InTrans).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Zhang.

Additional information

Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nahvi, A., Zhang, Y., Arabzadeh, A. et al. Deterministic and stochastic life-cycle cost analysis for Otta seal surface treatment on low volume roads. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 12, 101–109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0013-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0013-4

Keywords

Navigation