Abstract
This study mainly assesses the degree of preferential flow based on species diversity theory, which can provide a novel insight for the study of preferential flow. Three forest stands were selected for oak, pine, and bamboo forests. Field dye-tracing experiments were conducted to characterize the distribution of preferential flow paths. Diversity indices were applied to assess the spatial variability of flow paths distribution by measuring the relative dye-solution concentration. The differences between pine and oak/bamboo forests were statistically significant for dye coverage (DC) (P < 0.05) but not between oak and bamboo forests (P > 0.05). The differences in the matrix flow depth (UniFr), preferential flow ratio (PF-fr), and preferential flow dye coverage (DCpf) between the three forests were significant (P < 0.05), while the differences in fractal dimension (FD) were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The Simpson index (Ds), Shannon–Wiener index (H), and Margalef index (Dm) differed significantly between oak and pine/bamboo forests (P < 0.05) but not between pine and bamboo forests (P > 0.05). The Pielou indices (E) did not differ significantly between any of the forests (P > 0.05). Significant positive correlations were observed for DC, PF-fr, DCpf, and all four diversity indices (P < 0.05), whereas significant negative correlations were found between FD, UniFr, and the indices (P < 0.05). Diversity indices were mainly influenced by the degree of preferential flow, in particular DCpf, PF-fr, and UniFr.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data are available on request from the corresponding author with reasonable requirements.
References
Anderson AE, Weiler M, Alila Y, Hudson RO (2009) Dye staining and excavation of a lateral preferential flow network. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:935–944. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-935-2009
Baetens JM, Verbist K, Cornelis WM, Gabriels D, Soto G (2009) On the influence of coarse fragments on soil water retention. Water Resour Res 45:W07408. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007402
Bargués Tobella A, Reese H, Almaw A, Bayala J, Malmer A, Laudon H, Ilstedt U (2014) The effect of trees on preferential flow and soil infiltrability in an agroforestry parkland in semiarid Burkina Faso. Water Resour Res 50:3342–3354. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015197
Beven K, Germann P (2013) Macropores and water flow in soils revisited. Water Resour Res 49:3071–3092. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i005p01311
Bogner C, Gaul D, Kolb A, Schmiedinger I, Huwe B (2010) Investigating flow mechanisms in a forest soil by mixed-effects modelling. Eur J Soil Sci 61:1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01300.x
Bundt M, Jäggi M, Blaser P, Siegwolf R, Hagedorn F (2001) Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Preferential Flow Paths and Matrix of a Forest Soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1529–1538. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6551529x
Cassel DK, Wendroth O, Nielsen DR (2000) Assessing spatial variability in an agricultural experiment station field: opportunities arising from spatial dependence. Agron J 92:706–714. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.924706x
Cerdà A (2001) Effects of rock fragment cover on soil infiltration, interrill runoff and erosion. Eur J Soil Sci 52:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00354.x
Condon LE, Kollet S, Bierkens MFP, Fogg GE, Maxwell RM, Hill MC, Fransen HH, Verhoef A, Van Loon AF, Sulis M, Abesser C (2021) Global groundwater modeling and monitoring: Opportunities and challenges. Water Resour Res 57:e2020WR029500. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029500
Cosh MH, Jackson TJ, Moran S, Bindlish R (2008) Temporal persistence and stability of surface soil moisture in a semi-arid watershed. Remote Sens Environ 112:304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.001
Deng X, Xiong K, Yu Y, Zhang S, Kong L, Zhang Y (2023) A Review of Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies: Enlightenment for the Optimization of Forest Ecosystem Functions in Karst Desertification Control. Forests 14:88. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010088
Etana A, Larsbo M, Keller T, Arvidsson J, Schjønning P, Forkman J, Jarvis N (2013) Persistent subsoil compaction and its effects on preferential flow patterns in a loamy till soil. Geoderma 192:430–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.08.015
Franklin DH, West LT, Radcliffe DE, Hendrix PF (2007) Characteristics and genesis of preferential flow paths in a piedmont ultisol. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:752–758. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.0166
Franklin SM, Kravchenko AN, Vargas R, Vasilas B, Fuhrmann JJ, Jin Y (2021) The unexplored role of preferential flow in soil carbon dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 161:108398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108398
Gramlich A, Stoll S, Stamm C, Walter T, Prasuhn V (2018) Effects of artificial land drainage on hydrology, nutrient and pesticide fluxes from agricultural fields-A review. Agr Ecosyst Environ 266:84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.04.005
Hagedorn F, Bundt M (2002) The age of preferential flow paths. Geoderma 108:119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00129-5
Hardie MA, Cotching WE, Doyle RB, Holz G, Lisson S, Mattern K (2011) Effect of antecedent soil moisture on preferential flow in a texture-contrast soil. J Hydrol 398:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.008
Iwasaki Y, Ryo M, Sui P, Yoshimura (2012) Evaluating the relationship between basin-scale fish species richness and ecologically relevant flow characteristics in rivers worldwide. Freshwater Biol 57:2173–2180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02861.x
Jacobs JM, Mohanty BP, Hsu EC, Miller D (2004) SMEX02: Field scale variability, time stability and similarity of soil moisture. Remote Sens Environ 92:436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.017
Jia YH, Shao MA (2013) Temporal stability of soil water storage under four types of revegetation on the northern Loess Plateau of China. Agr Water Manage 117:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.013
Jonsson M, Bengtsson J, Gamfeldt L, Moen J, Snäll T (2019) Levels of forest ecosystem services depend on specific mixtures of commercial tree species. Nat Plants 5:141–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0346-z
Kamermans P, Hemminga MA, Tack JF, Mateo M, Marbà N, Mtolera M, Stapel J, Verheyden A, Daele T (2002) Groundwater effects on diversity and abundance of lagoonal seagrasses in kenya and on zanzibar island (east africa). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 231:75–83. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps231075
Keram A, Halik Ü, Aishan T, Keyimu M, Jiapaer K, Li G (2021) Tree mortality and regeneration of Euphrates poplar riparian forests along the Tarim River, Northwest China. For Ecosyst 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00323-x
King K, Bremigan M, Infante D, Cheruvelil K (2021) Surface water connectivity affects lake and stream fish species richness and composition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 78:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0090
Kobayashi M, Shimizu T (2007) Soil water repellency in a Japanese cypress plantation restricts increases in soil water storage during rainfall events. Hydrol Process 21:2356–2364. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6754
Kulli B, Gysi M, Flühler H (2003) Visualizing soil compaction based on flow pattern analysis. Soil till Res 70:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00121-6
López-Ramírez SM, Mayer A, Sáenz L, Muñoz-Villers LE, Holwerda F, Looker N, Schürz C, Berry Z, Manson R, Asbjornsen H, Kolka R, Geissert D, Lezama C (2021) A comprehensive calibration and validation of SWAT-T using local datasets, evapotranspiration and streamflow in a tropical montane cloud forest area with permeable substrate in central Veracruz. Mexico J Hydrol 603:126781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126781
Luo L, Lin H, Halleck P (2008) Quantifying soil structure and preferential flow in intact soil using X-ray computed tomography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0179
Merdun H, Meral R, Riza Demirkiran A (2008) Effect of the initial soil moisture content on the spatial distribution of the water retention. Eurasian Soil Sci 41:1098–1106. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229308100128
Mossadeghi-Björklund M, Arvidsson J, Keller T, Koestel J, Lamandé M, Larsbo M, Jarvis N (2016) Effects of subsoil compaction on hydraulic properties and preferential flow in a Swedish clay soil. Soil Till Res 156:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.09.013
Nimmo JR (2012) Preferential flow occurs in unsaturated conditions. Hydrol Process 26:786–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8380
Öhrström P, Persson M, Albergel J, Zante P, Nasri S, Berndtsson R, Olsson J (2002) Field-scale variation of preferential flow as indicated from dye coverage. J Hydrol 257:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00537-6
Posadas AN, Giménez D, Quiroz R, Protz R (2003) Multifractal characterization of soil pore systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1361–1369. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1361
Shao W, Bogaard TA, Bakker M, Greco R (2015) Quantification of the influence of preferential flow on slope stability using a numerical modelling approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 19:2197–2212. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2197-2015
Shi X, Qin T, Yan D, Tian F, Wang H (2021) A meta-analysis on effects of root development on soil hydraulic properties. Geoderma 403:115363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115363
Soares A, Moldrup P, Vendelboe AL, Katuwal K, Norgaard T, Delerue-Matos C, Tuller M, de Jonge LW (2015) Effects of soil compaction and organic carbon content on preferential flow in loamy field soils. Soil Sci 180:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000105
Sprenger M, Oelmann Y, Weihermüller L, Wolf S, Wilcke W, Potvin C (2013) Tree species and diversity effects on soil water seepage in a tropical plantation. Forest Ecolo Manag 309:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.022
Tornés E, Colls M, Acua V, Sabater S (2021) Duration of water flow interruption drives the structure and functional diversity of stream benthic diatoms. Sci Total Environ 770:144675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144675
Wang F, Wang G, Cui J, Guo L, Mello CR, Boyer EW, Tang X, Yang Y (2022) Preferential flow patterns in forested hillslopes of east Tibetan Plateau revealed by dye tracing and soil moisture network. Eur J Soil Sci 73:e13294. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13294
Wiekenkamp I, Huisman JA, Bogena HR, Lin HS, Vereecken H (2016) Spatial and temporal occurrence of preferential flow in a forested headwater catchment. J Hydrol 534:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.050
Williams MR, Coronel O, McAfee SJ, Sanders LL (2020) Preferential flow of surface-applied solutes: Effect of lysimeter design and initial soil water content. Vadose Zone J 19:e20052. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20052
Zhang ZB, Peng X, Wang LL, Zhao QG, Lin H (2013) Temporal changes in shrinkage behavior of two paddy soils under alternative flooding and drying cycles and its consequence on percolation. Geoderma 192:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.08.009
Zhang Y, Zhang M, Niu J, Li H, Xiao R, Zheng H, Bech J (2016) Rock fragments and soil hydrological processes: significance and progress. CATENA 147:153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.07.012
Zhang Y, Niu J, Zhang M, Xiao Z, Zhu W (2017) Interaction between plant roots and soil water flow in response to preferential flow paths in northern China. Land Degrad Dev 28:648–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2592
Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Ma Z, Chen J, Akbar J, Zhang S, Che C, Zhang M, Cerdà A (2018a) A review of preferential water flow in soil science. Can J Soil Sci 98:604–618. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2018-0046
Zhang Y, Zhao W, He J, Fu L (2018b) Soil susceptibility to macropore flow across a desert-oasis ecotone of the Hexi corridor, Northwest China. Water Resour Res 54:1281–1294. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021462
Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Zhang M (2021) Novel indicator for assessing wetland degradation based on the index of hydrological connectivity and its correlation with the root-soil interface. Ecol Indic 133:108392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108392
Zhang W, Wang L, Tang Z, Zhang Y (2022) Effects of the Root System Architecture of Pinus taeda and Phyllostachys edulis on the Index of Hydrological Connectivity in Subtropical Forest Ecosystems. Forests 13:2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122008
Zhao Y, Peth S, Wang XY, Lin H, Horn R (2010) Controls of surface soil moisture spatial patterns and their temporal stability in a semi-arid steppe. Hydrol Process 24:2507–2519. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7665
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the reviewers and editors for their comments and suggestions.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41907007), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190747), and the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (SJCX23_0344).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yinghu Zhang designed the research. Cunjie Yan, Yanhong Chen, and Wenqi Zhang performed the field experiments. Yinghu Zhang analyzed experimental data and wrote the manuscript. Yinghu Zhang reviewed and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Yan, C., Chen, Y. et al. Application of Species Diversity Theory to Quantitatively Assess the Degree of Preferential Flow in Forest Ecosystems. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01746-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01746-5