Abstract
Ticks cause various harmful effects on livestock with a combination of direct and indirect effects. Resistance status of one host tick Rhipicephalus microplus from two districts, Banaskantha (BK) and Patan (PN) of North Gujarat was tested against synthetic pyrethroids (deltamethrin and cypermethrin) by adult immersion test (AIT).Ticks were collected from six talukas each from BK and PN. Tick isolates from eight places showed resistance against deltamethrin having resistance factor ranging from 2.52–22.59. Further, isolates from six places, Ranuj, Dhanera, Radhanpur, Patan, Dhaneri and Kheda showed resistance against cypermethrin with resistance factor in range of 2.42–18.66. The results reveal a remarkable variance of susceptibility to deltamethrin and cypermethrin in the R. microplus populations studied. Isolates from PN district, from talukas Ranuj, Patan, Radhanpur, and Sidhpur were resistant to deltamethrin with resistance level II in all the places and resistance factors estimated were 16.73, 16.7, 9.64, and 7.25, respectively. Tick isolated from Patan, Radhanpur and Ranuj were resistant to cypermethrin with resistance level II, II and I, respectively with resistance factor of 11.74, 6.74 and 2.42, respectively. The slope and R2 values for deltamethrin resistant tick isolates were in the range of, 0.64 ± 0.33 to 2.28 ± 0.21 and 50.0 to 97.62; and that for cypermethrin resistant tick isolates was 0.64 ± 0.33 to 2.28 ± 0.21 and 46.53 to 88.26 respectively. The finding is significant, as it reports the development of resistance against most commonly used acaricides in very large area of North Gujarat and the data generated would be useful in formulation of effective control strategies against ticks of this large geographic region.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data were generated from the experiment conducted.
References
Ahanger RR, Godara R, Katoch R, Yadav A, Bhutyal ADS, Katoch M, Singh NK, Bader MA (2015) Deltamethrin resistance in field populations of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Jammu and Kashmir. India Exp App Acarol 67:467–475
Ahmed J, Alp H, Aksin M, Seitzer U (2007) Current status of ticks in Asia. Parasitol Res 101:159–162
Bicalho KA, Ferreira F, Borges LM, Ribeiro MF (2001) In vitro evaluation of the effects of some acaricides on life stages of Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Acari: Ixodidae). Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 53:548–552
Castro- Janer E, Rifran L, Piggio J, Gill A, Miller RJ, TTS S (2009) In vitro test to establish LC50 and discriminating concentration of fipronil against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodididae) and their characterisation. Vet Parasitol 162:120–128
Drummond RO, Ernst SE, Trevino JL, Gladney WJ, Graham OH (1973) Boophilus annulatus and B. microplus: laboratory tests of insecticides. J Econ Entomol 66:130–133
FAO (2004) Ticks: Acaricide resistance: diagnosis, management and prevention. Resistance management and integrated parasite control in ruminants: Guidelines, Rome, pp 1–53
Faza AP, Pinto IS, Fonseca I, Antunes GR, Monteiro CM, Daemon E, Muniz Mde S, Martins MF, Furlong J, Prata MC (2013) A new approach to characterization of the resistance of populations of Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) to organophosphate and pyrethroid in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Exp Parasitol 134:519–523
Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gaur RS, Sangwan AK, Sangwan N, Kumar S (2016) Acaricide resistance in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus and Hyalomma anatolicum collected from Haryana and Rajasthan states of India. Exp Appl 69:487–500
Geeverghese G (2000) Taxonomic features and biology of Ixodid and Argasid ticks of veterinary and medical importance. NTP organized by CAS, Bangalore
Ghosh S, Kumar R, Nagar G, Kumar S, Sharma AK, Srivastava A, Kumar S, Kumar KA, Saravanan BC (2015) Survey of acaricides resistance status of Rhipiciphalus (Boophilus) microplus collected from selected places of Bihar, an eastern state of India. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 6:668–675
Godara R, Katoch R, Rafiqi SI, Yadav A, Nazim K, Sharma R, Singh NK, Katoch M (2019) Synthetic pyrethroid resistance in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks from North-Western Himalayas, India. Trop Anim Health Prod 51:1203–1208
Goncalves K, Toigo E, Ascoli B, Von Poser G, Ribeiro VS (2007) Effects of solvents and surfactant agents on the female and larvae of cattle tick Boophilus microplus. Parasitol Res 100:1267–1270
Jonsson NN, Hope M (2007) Progress in the epidemiology and diagnosis of amitraz resistance in the cattle tick Boophilus microplus. Vet Parasitol 146:193–198
Kumar S, Sharma AK, Nagar G, Ghosh S (2015) Determination and establishment of discriminating concentrations of malathion, coumaphos, fenvalerate and fipronil for monitoring acaricide resistance in ticks infesting animals. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 6:383–387
Lovis L, Perret JL, Bouvier J, Fellay JM, Kaminsky R, Betschart B, Sager H (2011) A new In vitro test to evaluate the resistance level against acaricides of the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Vet Parasitol 182:269–280
Miller RJ, Davey RJ, George JE (1999) Characterization of pyrethroid resistance and susceptibility to coumaphos in Mexican Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 36:533–538
Minjauw B, Mc Leod A (2003) Research report, DFID Animal Health Programme, Centre for tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK pp 59–60
Sagar SV, Saini K, Sharma AK, Kumar S, Kumar R, Fular A, Shakya M, Upadhaya D, Nagar G, Shanmuganath C, Samanta S (2020) Acaricide resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus collected from selected districts of Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Punjab states of India. Trop Anim Health Prod 52:611–618
Sen SK, Fletcher TB (1962) Veterinary entomology and acarology for India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, p 668
Sharma AK, Kumar R, Kumar S, Nagar G, Singh NK, Rawat SS, Dhakad ML, Rawat AKS, Ray DD, Ghosh S (2012) Deltamethrin and cypermethrin resistance status of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus collected from six agro-climatic regions of India. Vet Parasitol 188:337–345
Sharma N, Singh V, Shyma KP, Vikram S, Gupta JP (2018) Comparative resistance status of Hyalomma anatolicum and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks against synthetic Pyrethroids (deltamethrin and cypermethrin) from Banaskantha, Gujarat, India. Int J Acarol 44:268–275
Shyma KP, Gupta JP, Singh V, Patel KK (2015) In vitro detection of acaricidal resistance status of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus against commercial preparation of Deltamethrin, Flumethrin, and Fipronil from North Gujarat, India. J Parasitol Res 2015:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/506586
Singh NK, Rath SS (2014) Esterase mediated resistance against synthetic pyrethroids in field populations of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Punjab districts of India. Vet Parasitol 204:330–338
Upadhaya D, Kumar B, Kumar S, Sharma AK, Fular A, Bisht N, Srivastava S, Boruah RR, Nagar G, Shakya M, Nath T (2020) Characterization of acaricide resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus populations infesting cattle in northeastern India and assessment of local plant extracts for tick management. Vet Parasitol 277:109011
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Principal, College of Veterinary & Animal Husbandry, and Director of Research, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Gujarat, India for providing necessary research facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/competing interests
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solanki, V., Singh, V., K.P., S. et al. Resistance status of one host tick Rhipicephalus microplus of arid and semi-arid region of Gujarat, India. Int J Trop Insect Sci 41, 1633–1641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-020-00364-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-020-00364-9