Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is a persistent lung infection caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The disease is characterized by high mortality rates of over 1 million per year. Unfortunately, the potency and effectiveness of currently used anti-TB drugs is gradually decreasing due to the constant development of persistence and resistance by M. tuberculosis. The adverse side effects associated with current anti-TB drugs, along with anti-TB drug resistance, present an opportunity to bio-prospect novel potent anti-TB drugs from unique sources. Fundamentally, fungi are a rich source of bioactive secondary metabolites with valuable therapeutic potential. Enhancing the potency and effectiveness of fungal-based anti-TB drug leads by chemical synthesis and/or modification with nanomaterials, may result in the discovery of novel anti-TB drugs. In this review, the antimycobacterial activity of fungal-derived compounds and mycogenic nanoparticles are summarized. Numerous fungal-derived compounds as well as some mycogenic nanoparticles that exhibit strong antimycobacterial activity that is comparable to that of approved drugs, were found. If fully explored, fungi holds the promise to become key drivers in the generation of lead compounds in TB-drug discovery initiatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Tuberculosis
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB). TB results in high yearly mortalities and negatively impacts economies of the most affected countries each year [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that one-third of the global population is infected with the latent form of TB [2]. In 2020, an estimated 5.8 million new TB cases and 1.5 million TB-related deaths were reported worldwide [3].
The recommended treatment for drug susceptible TB involves the use of four first-line drugs which include isoniazid (1), rifampicin (2), pyrazinamide (3) and ethambutol (4), which are administered for six months (Table 1 and Fig. 1) [4, 5]. The principle of using multidrug therapy for TB treatment is founded upon the fact that these drugs have different mechanisms of action. When used together, they reduce selective pressure that may lead to mutant strains surviving because of using a single antibiotic. Isoniazid (1) is a prodrug activated by KatG (a catalase-peroxidase enzyme in Mycobacteria), which blocks the synthesis cell wall mycolic acids by inhibiting the enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase, InhA, which forms part of the class II fatty acid synthase multi-enzyme (FAS-II) system [6]. Resistance to isoniazid (1) by M. tuberculosis commonly results from mutations in the katG, kasA and inhA genes. Rifampicin (2) is known to bind to the RNA polymerase β subunit which results in the inhibition of DNA-dependent RNA synthesis, resistance is commonly caused by mutations in the rpoB gene [7].
Pyrazinamide’s (3) mechanism of action is poorly understood, the current hypothesis is that the drug is activated by pyrazinamidase in M. tuberculosis to form pyrazinoic acid, which then binds to aspartate decarboxylase PanD and causes its degradation [8]. This action leads to a halt in the synthesis of pantothenate and co-enzyme A downstream. Mutations in rpsA, pncA and panD genes have been implicated in pyrazinamide (3) resistance [9]. Ethambutol (4) targets three arabinosyltransferases, namely EmbA, EmbB and EmbC [10]. Both EmbA and EmbB are involved arabinogalactan synthesis, while EmbC is involved in lipoarabinomannan synthesis, both metabolites being essential components of the cell wall. Mutations in the embA, embB and embC genes commonly result in resistance.
Multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively-drug resistant (XDR) M. tuberculosis simply refers to strains which no longer respond to first-line drugs. The occurrence of these strains is prevalent and necessitates the use of second-line anti-TB drugs which commonly include bedaquiline (5), pretomanid (6), linezolid (7), streptomycin (8) and amikacin (9), kanamycin (10), capreomycin (11), delamanid (12), clofazimine (13), moxifloxacin (14), levofloxacin (15), ofloxacin (16) and ciprofloxacin (17) [4, 5]. Second-line TB drugs have been reported to be more toxic and are administered for nine to 24 months with only about half the number of patients being cured [3]. Bedaquiline (5) inhibits the synthesis of ATP by inhibiting the F1F0 ATP synthase (proton pump), and mutations in atpE and rv0678 genes are known to confer resistance [11, 12].
In hypoxic conditions where M. tuberculosis is non-replicating, lethality of the nitroimidazole, pretomanid (6), is due to its prior activation by a deazaflavin dependent nitroreductase (Ddn), which produces des-nitro metabolites that interfere with cytochrome oxidases and ATP homeostasis consequently [13]. In replicating M. tuberculosis, pretomanid (6) inhibits F420-dependent hydroxy mycolic acid dehydrogenase (fHMAD) which produces ketomycolic acids and thus interferes with synthesis of mycolic acids [14]. Resistance to pretomanid (6) is conferred by mutations in fbiA, fbiB, fbiC, fbiD and ddn genes which are involved in the F420 system.
Linezolid (7) inhibits protein synthesis by binding to the 23S ribosomal RNA of the 50S subunit, thus preventing its complexation with the 30S subunit, mRNA and other components required for the assembly of a functional protein synthesis complex [15]. Mutations in the rrl gene encoding 23S rRNA, and the rplC gene encoding the L3 ribosomal protein, are both responsible for resistance to linezolid (7) [16]. The primary mechanism of action for aminoglycosides (streptomycin (8), amikacin (9), kanamycin (10) and capreomycin (11)) is very similar, they inhibit protein synthesis by irreversibly binding to RNA-binding S12 protein and 16S rRNA, which form part of the 30S ribosomal subunit and are encoded by the rpsL and rrs genes and [17, 18]. This alters the ribosome’s shape which leads to failure in the formation of the protein synthesis complex. Mutations in the rpsL, rrs and tlyA genes have been observed to confer resistance to aminoglycosides.
Delamanid (12) is recognized as an inhibitor of mycolic acid synthesis [19] and is thought to undergo the same activation process and exhibit the same mechanism of action as pretomanid (6).
Clofazimine (13) has a poorly understood mechanism of action in M. tuberculosis. One hypothesis is that it attaches to guanine residues in M. tuberculosis DNA and thus blocks DNA replication. Since clofazimine (13) appears to compete with menaquinone (type II NADH:quinone oxidoreductase substrate) for electrons, it is thought to undergo spontaneous oxidation which results in the generation of free oxygen species (ROS) which are antimicrobial. In addition, clofazimine (13) is a cationic amphiphile which is thought to inhibit ion transporting ATPases and thus interfering with ion uptake [20]. Mutations in the rv1979c, rv2535c and pepQ genes have been linked with clofazimine (13) resistance [21].
Moxifloxacin (14), levofloxacin (15), ofloxacin (16) and ciprofloxacin (17) are fluoroquinolones which also have a similar mechanism of action. These drugs inhibit the DNA ligase action of type II topoisomerases (DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV) while allowing for the nuclease action to continue, this results in the release of DNA with single and double stranded breaks by the enzyme which consequently leads to cell death [22]. Mutations in the gyrA and gyrB genes confers resistance to fluoroquinolones.
It is evident that the discovery of new anti-TB drugs needs to be continued as resistance has been reported for drugs 1–17. A very interesting natural source of chemically diverse and biologically active compounds is fungi. Over the years, numerous fungal compounds with excellent antimycobacterial activity have been reported, yet no reports on the exploration of these compounds in clinical trials are available. It is the view of the authors that fungal compounds have the potential of becoming key drivers in contributing lead compounds for TB-drug development studies. Enhancing these compounds using chemical synthesis (semi-synthesis) and nanotechnology can potentially impart novel properties that reduce cytotoxicity to normal cells and susceptibility to M. tuberculosis resistance, all without compromising bioactivity.
In this review, fungal-derived compounds with antimycobacterial activity and those that have been subjected to modification by chemical synthesis (semi-synthesis) are presented. Since mycogenic nanoparticles (nanoparticles synthesized using fungi) are stabilized by fungal compounds during synthesis, it may be viewed as a unique mechanism of modifying fungal compounds, thus mycogenic nanoparticles were included in this review. The list of compounds and nanoparticles was obtained by searching for articles in PubMed and by free-text searching using the following key words and their combinations: Fungi, TB, anti-TB, antimycobacterial, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), M. tuberculosis, nanoparticles, mycogenic nanoparticles, modification, synthesis, semi-synthesis. Only compounds which had an MIC of less than 100 µg/mL were considered for inclusion. Concentrations given in micromole (µM) in the original studies were converted to micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL) to maintain consistency.
2 Fungal secondary metabolites with antimycobacterial activity
Fungal secondary metabolites are produced in metabolic pathways encoded by genes often physically linked in fungal chromosomes and commonly known as biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) [23]. Numerous bioactive fungal secondary metabolites have been reported and include several antibiotics such as the penicillins, ergot alkaloids and cephalosporins, all commonly used in the treatment of microbial infections [24]. Even though there are no approved anti-TB drugs of fungal origin to date, there are numerous fungal-derived compounds which have been previously shown to possess strong natural antimycobacterial activity which is comparable to that of anti-TB drugs currently in use.
2.1 Compounds from endophytic fungi and plant-pathogenic fungi
Endophytes are a ubiquitous class of endosymbiotic microorganisms (most common are bacteria and fungi) that spend part/all of their life cycle in plant tissues without causing them harm or disease [25]. They can be isolated from any part of the plant, including roots, flowers, fruits, stems, leaves and buds. Endophytes often benefit the plants by producing phytohormones and metabolites that enhance plant growth and tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses [25]. In the plant microbiome, fungal pathogens may also exist and have a rather negative effect to the plant’s growth and health as compared to endophytes.
Fungal endophyte PSU-N24 was isolated from the branch of Garcinia nigrolineata collected in Thailand, and was fermented to produce 9α-hydroxyhalorosellinia A (18), which was found to have an MIC of 13.3 µg/mL after testing against M. tuberculosis H37Ra [26]. Desoxybostrycin (19) and 9β-hydroxydihydrodesoxybostrycin (20) produced by the same fungus were found to be less active against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, having an MIC of 50 and 25 µg/mL, respectively [26]. Diaporthe sp. P133 was isolated as an endophyte from Pandanus amaryllifolius leaves and was fermented in potto dextrose broth for three weeks to produce diaportheone B (21), a benzopyranone [27]. The MIC value of diaportheone B (21) against M. tuberculosis H37Rv was found to be 0.77 µg/mL. Phomopsis sp. BCC 1323, and endophyte isolated from a teak leaf (Tectona grandis L.), produced two novel xanthone dimers, phomoxanthones A and B (22 and 23), which had MIC values of 0.5 and 6.25 µg/mL respectively against M. tuberculosis H37Ra [28]. Three alkaloids designated phomapyrrolidones A–C (24–26) were purified from extracts of the endophytic fungus, Phoma sp. NRRL 46,751, isolated from the lower crown of Saurauia scaberrinae collected in Papua New Guinea [29]. The phomapyrrolidones A–C (24–26) had MIC values of 20.1, 5.9 and 5.2 µg/mL, respectively against M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Chaetomium globosum IFB-E036 was isolated as a root endophyte of Cynodon dactylon in China and was fermented over a solid substrate to produce chaetoglocins A and B (27 and 28), which both had MIC values of 16 µg/mL against M. smegmatis CGMCC1.562 [30].
Fusarium avenaceum DAOM 196,490 was isolated as a pathogen from needles of the balsam fir tree (Abies balsamea) infested with spruce budworm (Choristoneura funiferana Clem.) [31]. F. avenaceum DAOM 196,490 was found to produce several enniatins, among them was enniatin A1 (29) which was tested in another study against M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M. tuberculosis H37Ra, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG and M. smegmatis mc2155 [32]. Enniatin A1 (29) was found to be slightly more active against virulent M. tuberculosis H37Rv (MIC = 1 µg/mL), compared to the avirulent M. tuberculosis H37Ra (MIC = 2 µg/mL). Against M. bovis and M. bovis BCG, enniatin A1 (29) had an MIC of 2 µg/mL for both strains. M. smegmatis mc2155 was the least susceptible with an MIC of 8 µg/mL.
2.2 Compounds from marine fungi
Marine fungi describes those fungi able to colonize and adapt to the conditions in marine environments [33]. They are ubiquitous in the ocean and can be found decomposing organic matter, sediments or as associated of other organisms. In one study, a water hyacinth pathogen, Alternaria eichhorniae, produced the anthraquinone, 4-deoxybostrycin (30), whose MIC values on M. tuberculosis H37Rv and clinical MDR M. tuberculosis K2903531 were 15 µg/mL and < 5 µg/mL respectively [34]. Transcriptomics of M. tuberculosis H37Rv exposed to 4-deoxybostrycin (30) showed that the compound significantly altered the expression of 119 genes, 46 of these genes (24 upregulated genes and 22 down-regulated) are known to be functional genes involved in DNA replication and translation, carbohydrate metabolism, signal transduction and lipid metabolism [34]. Sclerotiotides M and N (31 and 32) were isolated from the fungus Aspergillus insulicola HDN151418, a symbiont of a marine sponge collected 410 m deep from Prydz Bay, Antarctica [35]. Sclerotiotides M and N (31 and 32) were found to be active against Mycobacterium phlei with a MIC of 1.37 and 5.63 µg/mL [35].
Trichoderins A, A1 and B (33–35) were isolated from the culture of Trichoderma sp., from an unidentified marine sponge, were tested for antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M. bovis BCG and M. smegmatis [36]. The MIC values of the trichoderins (33–35) were in the range of 0.02–2.0 µg/mL, the virulent M. tuberculosis H37Rv being more susceptible to trichoderin A (33) (MIC = 0.12 µg/mL). Fusarium spp. PSU-F14 was isolated from a sea fan (Annella sp.) and was found to produce nigrosporin B (36) and anhydrofusarubin (37), which had an MIC of 12.5 and 25.1 µg/mL respectively against M. tuberculosis H37Ra [37].
2.3 Compounds from entomopathogenic fungi
Entomopathogenic fungi can best be described as fungi that are capable of infecting and killing insects. They are popular in Agriculture where they are explored as natural biological control agents against insect pests that attack crops [38]. Fungi from the Hirsutella genus are among the most abundant and important entomopathogens and are popularly known for their antimicrobial proteins. The entomopathogenic fungus, Hirsutella kobayasii BCC 1660, was collected from the Kaeng Krachan National Park in Thailand and fermented in potato dextrose broth to produce hirsutellide A (38), a cyclohexadepsipeptide [39]. The MIC of hirsutellide A (38) against M. tuberculosis H37Ra ranged between 6–12 µg/mL, while showing no cytotoxicity on Vero cells at 50 µg/mL. Cyclohexadepsipeptides hirsutatins A and B (39 and 40) were isolated from Hirsutella nivea BCC 2594 and were found to possess antimycobacterial activity [40]. Hirsutatins A and B (39 and 40) both had an MIC of 50 µg/mL against M. tuberculosis H37Ra. The fungus, Paecilomyces tenuipes BCC 1614 was collected from Khlong Naka Wildlife Sanctuary in Thailand, and was shown to produce the two bioactive cyclodepsipeptides, beauvericin (41) and beauvericin A (42) [41]. The MIC of beauvericin (41) and beauvericin A (42) against M. tuberculosis H37Ra was found to be 12.5 and 25 µg/mL, respectively. Torrubiella tenuis BCC 12,732 is an entomopathogenic fungus which was isolated from a Homoptera scale insect, also collected in Thailand [42]. T. tenuis BCC 12,732 produced 6,8-dihydroxy-3-hydroxymethylisocoumarin (43) which had an MIC of 25 µg/mL against M. tuberculosis H37Ra.
Seven enniatins, namely, enniatins B, B4, C, G, H, I and MK1688 (44–50) were isolated from Verticillium hemipterigenum BCC 1449, a fungus isolated from an adult leaf hopper of the Homoptera suborder, collected in Thailand [43]. After testing against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, both enniatins B and B4 (44 and 45) were found to have an MIC of 2.12 µg/mL, while enniatins C, G, H and I (46–48) had an MIC 6.25 µg/mL. MK1688 (50) was the most active of the seven enniatins, exhibiting an MIC of 1.56 µg/mL. In another study also involving enniatins, a spore of an unidentified fungus BCC 2629, was collected from the synemma of Hirsutella fornicarum, attached to an unnamed ant [44]. Solvent extraction and purification of metabolites from the fermentation broth of the BCC 2629 yielded enniatin L (51), a 1:1 mixture of enniatins M1 and M2 (52), and enniatin N (53). These enniatins were found to be active against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, whereby enniatin L (51) exhibited an MIC of 12.5 µg/mL, while the 1:1 mixture of enniatins M1 and M2 (52) and enniatin N (53) both exhibited an MIC of 6.25 µg/mL.
2.4 Compounds from lichenicolous fungi
Lichens are macroscopic structures which are a composite of heterotrophic filamentous fungi and autotrophic photosynthetic algae/cyanobacteria, which associate in a mutualistic relationship [45]. The type of fungi that are able to colonize lichens are called lichenicolous fungi and may sometimes be lichen specific. The crude extract of Microsphaeropsis sp. BCC 3050 was tested for antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra and was found to be active [46]. Following bioassay guided fractionation, preussomerins E-I (54–58), 3'-O-demethylpreussomerin I (59), deoxypreussomerin A (60) and bipendinsin (61) were isolated and their MICs were 25, 3.12, 3.12–6.25, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 1.56–3.12 and 50 µg/mL. The preussomerins E-I (54–58) and 3'-O-demethylpreussomerin I (59) was also found to be significantly cytotoxic to KB and BC-1 cancer cell lines, and Vero cells which are a model of normal mammalian cells. The lichenized fungus, Trypethelium eluteriae Spreng., was fermented for 240 days in malt-yeast extract to produce lactone (62), trypethelone (63) and 4'-hydroxy-8-methoxytrypethelone methyl ether (64), which had MIC values of 50, 12.5 and 50, respectively against M. tuberculosis H37Rv [47]. Lichenicolous fungi are still underexplored as sources of antimycobacterial agents, and thus studies in this area are very few.
2.5 Compounds from mushrooms (macrofungi), soil fungi and others
Mushrooms, also known as macrofungi, are distinct from their microfungi counterparts in that they produce visible sporocarps (fruiting bodies) which typically appear above the ground (epigeous), or below the ground (hypogeous). Several medicinal mushrooms and the pharmacological activities of their compounds have been widely reported [48, 49]. Mushrooms belong the phylum Basidiomycota and are predominantly found soils of grasslands and forests as decomposers of organic matter. In agricultural soils, fungi from the phylum Ascomycota have been found to be predominant [50].
Fresh fruiting bodies of the macro-fungus Scleroderma citrinum KMILT-SCL01, were extracted with methanol and later fractionated to obtain 4,4'-dimethoxyvulpinic acid (65) which had an MIC of 25 µg/mL against M. tuberculosis H37Ra [51]. Two lanostane triterpenes, astraodoric acids A and B (66 and 67), isolated from an edible mushroom, Astraeus odoratus collected in Thailand, were found to have MIC values of 50 and 25 µg/mL, respectively against M. tuberculosis H37Rv [52]. The fruiting body of the mushroom, Ramaria cytidiophora, was collected in Canada and was subjected to a series of extraction and purification step to yield ramariolide A (68) [53]. The MIC values of ramariolide A (68) were found to be 8 and 64–128 µg/mL against M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis, respectively.
Mortierella alpina FKI-4905 was isolated from soil collected from the Bonin Islands in Japan, and was found to produce the peptide, calpinactam (69) [54]. The compound was tested against M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis and the MIC values were found to be 0.78 and 12.5 µg/mL, respectively. A new meroterpenoid, 1-hydroxychevalone C (70), was isolated from a forest-soil fungus, Neosartorya spinosa KKU-1NK1 [55].
Neosartorya species are the telemorphic (sexual) state of the Aspergillus species and thus have been both found to have metabolites in common. 1-hydroxychevalone C (70) from N. spinosa KKU-1NK1 was found to have an MIC value of 12.5 µg/mL against M. tuberculosis H37Ra [55]. The fungus Diaporthe sp. BCC 6140 was isolated from an unidentified wood in Thailand and was found to produce a pimarane diterpene designated diaporthein B (71), which had an MIC value of 3.1 µg/mL against M. tuberculosis H37Ra [56].
2.6 Fungal compounds active against Mycobacterial enzymes
About half of the marketed drugs are profiled as enzyme inhibitors or inactivators [57]. This is clear evidence that mechanistic enzyme studies in drug discovery are increasingly being used for hit-identification and validation of enzyme-targeted drugs. [58]. Existence of substrate binding pockets and the inherent nature of enzymes to catalyze reactions, both make enzymes druggable targets. Furthermore, some enzymes are uniquely expressed by M. tuberculosis and thus allow for selectivity. The data generated from enzyme assays can be used to guide lead optimization [57].
Mycobacterial protein tyrosine phosphatase A and B (MptpA and MptpB) are two interesting enzymes which selectively dephosphorylate human host signalling proteins, and thus have been identified as attractive targets in TB-drug discovery [59]. They are secreted by M. tuberculosis in phagosomes and are translocated to the cytosol of macrophages, where MptpA binds to the H subunit of V-ATPase to selectively restrict to catalytic substrate (VPS33B) which is found on the phagosome-lysosome fusion region [59]. The dephosphorylation of VPS33B is accompanied by a failure of the macrophage in forming the phagolysosome. At the same time, MptpB’s activity in the cytosol leads to increased phosphorylation of Akt and decreased phosphorylation of p38, thus leading to reduced apoptosis and increased necrosis [59].
Several fungal compounds have been reported to exhibit activity against MptpA and MptpB. Fusarium graminearum SYSU-MS5127, a fungus isolated from an anemone and cultivated in rice medium produced fusarielin M (72) which was tested against MptpB [60]. Both the inhibition constant (Ki) and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) were found to be 0.4 μg/mL (See Table 2). Fusarielin M (72) proved efficacious against intracellular M. bovis BCG in infected J774A.1 macrophage cells, where treatment with the compound resulted in a 62% decrease of bacterial load burden without significant macrophage cytotoxicity [60]. An MIC value of 12.3 μg/mL was reported after testing against M. tuberculosis H37Ra [60].
Asperlones A and B (73 and 74) and mitorubrin (75) were isolated from mangrove endophytic fungus Aspergillus sp. 16-5C and exhibited strong inhibitory activity against MptpB, with IC50 values between 1.5–1.6 µg/mL for the three metabolites [61]. Peniphenones B and C (76 and 77) were isolated from Penicillium dipodomyicola, an endophyte of mangrove Acanthus ilicifolius, collected from the South China Sea [62]. The two compounds (76 and 77) were found to have strong inhibitory activity against MptpB with IC50 values of 6.37 and 0.45 µg/mL respectively.
Chemical analysis of a marine-sponge derived fungus from the East China sea, Aspergillus sydowii MF357, resulted in the identification of sydowiols A and C (78 and 79) with weak bioactivity against M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis H37Rv, both compounds recording an MIC value of > 50 μg/mL on both cell lines [63]. However, sydowiols A and C (78 and 79) were more effective in inhibiting M. tuberculosis protein tyrosine phosphatase A (MptpA), with IC50 values of 14 and 24 μg/mL respectively for the two metabolites [63].
Mycobacterial proteasome is a protease which degrades intracellular proteins and has been validated as therapeutic target. Mycobacterial proteasome has been reported to offer protection from nitric oxide effects to the microbe [64, 65]. In one study, fellutamide B (80) (originally isolated from Penicillium fellutanum) was found to effectively inhibit the Mycobacterial proteasome by binding to the active site in a time dependent and single step mechanism, with the Ki found to be 0.004 µg/mL [66].
3 Chemically modified fungal compounds
Synthetic chemical modification of natural products in drug discovery allows for tailor-made modifications of compound structures that could lead to successful medicinal drugs. Regrettably, isolation and bioactivity studies of secondary metabolites are seldom conducted together with synthetic modifications even though all three stages are mutually beneficial. Combining these three stages undoubtedly accelerates discovery of compounds with novel antimycobacterial activity [67].
Pleuromutilin (81) was first reported in 1951 from extracts of Basidiomycetes Pleurotus mutilus and Pleurotus passeckerianus (now Clitopilus passeckerianus) and was shown to possess a significant antibiotic effect against M. smegmatis with a MIC of 32 μg/mL [68]. In a more recent study, four pleuromutilin D-leucine derivatives, UT-800, UT-810, UT-815 and UT-820 (82–85), which differed in the oxidation states of their C3-carbonyl and C12-vinyl groups exhibited MIC values ranging between 0.78–3.06 μg/mL against M. tuberculosis H37Rv, with UT-815 (84) showing the greatest MIC of 0.78 μg/mL [69]. Valnemulin (86), also a synthetic derivative of pleuromutilin (81) which is currently approved for treatment of a broad range of bacterial infections in animals exhibited antimycobacterial activity with a MIC value of 3.13 μg/mL in the same study [69]. Lefamulin (87) is another derivative of pleuromutilin (81) which is currently approved for treatment of community acquired pneumonia. In antimycobacterial studies involving clinical strains of rapid growing Mycobacteria, lefamulin (87) was found to have an MIC value of 16 µg/mL against 11 out of 30 Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus strains, an MIC value of 32 µg/mL against 15 out of 30 M. abscessus subsp. massiliense strains, and an MIC value of 16 µg/mL against all three M. abscessus subsp. bolletii strains used in the study (see Tables 3, 4) [70].
Methyl 4,4'-dimethoxyvulpinate (88) and 4,4'-dimethoxyvulpinic acid (89) were obtained from S. citrinum KMILT-SCL01 and subjected to synthetic modifications by bromination, methylation and acetylation to yield methyl 3,3'-dibromo-4,4'-dimethoxyvulpinate (90), 3,3'-dibromo-4,4'-dimethoxyvulpinic acid (91) and acetyl 4,4'-dimethoxyvulpinate (92) [51]. 3,3'-dibromo-4,4'-dimethoxyvulpinate (90) (derivative of 88) was found to be inactive against M. tuberculosis H37Ra at 200 μg/mL, while 91 and 92 (derivatives of 91) exhibited weak activity with a MIC of 100 μg/mL [51].
Ganoderma australe BCC 22,314 naturally produces a wide variety of lanostane triterpenoids, one of these being a (24E)-3β-acetoxy-15α-hydroxylanosta-7,9(11),24-trien-26-oic acid (also known as ganodermic acid T-O) (93) which was modified by an acylation reaction with propionyl chloride to produce (24E)-3β-acetoxy-15α-propionyloxylanosta-7,9(11),24-trien-26-oic acid (also referred to as GA003) (94) [71]. GA003 (94) was tested against M. tuberculosis H37Ra and the MIC value was found to be 0.098 μg/mL [71]. An oversight in this study is that naturally occurring ganodermic acid T-O (93) was not tested for antimycobacterial activity.
Aspergillus versicolor CHNSCLM-0063 was isolated from the coral Rumphella aggregata and fermented on rice solid medium to produce asperversiamide A (95) which exhibited an MIC of 10.5 µg/mL against M. marinum [72, 73]. Synthetic modifications involving the reacting asperversiamide A (95) with cinnamic acid derivatives in the presence of 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DAMP) and ethylene diamine hydrochloride (EDA-HCL) in dichloromethane were performed [73]. Eighteen new derivatives were synthesized and tested for antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, four unnamed derivatives (96–99) displayed activity with MIC values of 13.9 and 56.2 µg/mL for derivatives 96 and 97, and 13.3 µg/mL for derivatives 98 and 99 [73].
4 Mycogenic nanoparticles
Nanoparticles are particles with two or more dimensions with a size range of 1 nm to 100 nm [74]. Research and application of nanomaterials has gained prominence due to their tunable chemical, physical and biological properties which enhances their performance with respect to their bulk analogues [75,76,77]. As such, nanomaterials have found several biomedical applications which include drug delivery and targeting, in vivo and in vitro diagnostics, gene manipulations and immunomodulation [78].
Metallic nanoparticles, as their name suggests, contain an inorganic metal at their core. They are commonly explored for their antimicrobial properties which include the ability to trigger the production of ROS, interact and destabilize the membrane potential and interact with biomolecules such as DNA, ribosomes, proton efflux pumps, enzymes which regulate processes such as ATP synthesis and proteins involved in the electron transport chain [79]. Popular metallic nanoparticles used as antimicrobial agents include gold (Au), silver (Ag), copper (Cu), zinc oxide (ZnO) and iron oxide (Fe2O3 and Fe3O4) and bimetallic magnesium aluminum oxide (MgAl2O4) [80].
The use of fungi to synthesize nanoparticles is a “green synthesis” approach which is gaining momentum and is being used to overcome the limitations of chemical synthesis which requires the use of highly toxic reducing and stabilizing agents, sometimes generating nanoparticles which are also highly toxic and prone to aggregation [81]. Mycogenic synthesis of metal nanoparticles is usually performed by exposing the fungal to a metal salt under specified conditions. Intracellular or extracellular synthesis of nanoparticles can be achieved, the latter is preferred as harvesting the nanoparticles is easier. The use culture filtrate which is mixed with a metal salt is also common, this reduces complications in harvesting intracellular nanoparticles. The exact mechanism is often unclear, however reducing enzymes such as NADH- and NADPH-dependent reductases, nitrate and nitrite reductases, and non-enzyme proteins and peptides with metallo-interaction activities are thought to participate in the reduction of Mn+ to M0, thus resulting in nanoparticles [82]. Stabilization of the newly formed nanoparticles is then achieved by fungal secondary metabolites and proteins.
A few specific examples of mycosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles for antimycobacterial applications exist in literature. In one study, silver nitrate (AgNO3) was reduced using the crude enzymes in the broth filtrate from cultures of the Rhizopus stolonifera to produce stable and predominantly spherical Ag nanoparticles (100) with a size range between 3–20 nm [83]. These Ag nanoparticles (100) were tested against M. tuberculosis (clinical strain) an MIC value of 12.5 μg/mL was reported. Sivaraj, et al. [84], used extracts from commercial yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and synthesized spherical silver chloride (AgCl) nanoparticles (101) which were found to be approximately 17 nm in size. The AgCl nanoparticles (101) had an MIC value of 37 µg/mL against M. smegmatis mc2155 and M. tuberculosis H37Rv.
Instead of using fungi to synthesize and stabilize nanoparticles, there has been times when fungal derived compounds and their derivatives have been used in modifying, capping or stabilizing chemically synthesized nanoparticles. An interesting case is that of the antibiotic ampicillin, a β-lactam derivative of a Penicillium sp. metabolite (benzylpenicillin) which has been modified by the addition of an amino group, was conjugated on gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) nucleated on self-assembled PEGylated rosette nanotubes (Amp-AuNPs-RNT) and utilized in antimicrobial studies [85].
Significant work has been done in synthesis of nanoparticles using fungi for medical and industrial applications[86], however their application as antimicrobial agents against M. tuberculosis has been limited. Mycogenic metallic nanoparticles present opportunities that may potentially lead to the development of anti-TB nanodrugs.
5 Concluding remarks
Robust anti-TB drug discovery studies are crucial for the discovery of new compounds with antimycobacterial activity. Previous studies have shown that fungi are a reservoir of structurally diverse and biologically active secondary metabolites which may be explored to discover novel anti-TB drugs. A total of 82 fungal derived compounds and their semi-synthetic derivatives were presented in this review. A total of six fungal compounds were reported to have MIC values of ≤ 2 µg/mL against M. tuberculosis, namely diaportheone B (21), phomoxanthone A (22), enniatin A1 (29), trichoderin A (33), trichoderin B (35) and MK1688 (50). Derivatives UT-800 (82), UT-815 (83), UT-815 (84) and GA003 (94) were also found to exhibit excellent antimycobacterial activity with MIC values of ≤ 2 µg/mL. Even though mycogenic synthesis of metallic nanoparticles has been applied for both industrial and medical purposes, there is still a gap in research on mycogenic synthesis for antimycobacterial studies. After carefully going through the studies presented in this review, authors concluded that fungal kingdom is truly a reservoir of bioactive compounds which have the potential to become drivers of TB-drug discovery. Furthermore, mycogenic synthesis presents opportunities for the development of truly novel TB-drugs of the future.
Data availability
All data are contained in this article.
References
Barberis I, Bragazzi NL, Galluzzo L, Martini M (2017) The history of tuberculosis: from the first historical records to the isolation of Koch’s bacillus. J Prev Med Hyg 58:E9–E12
WHO (2018) Tuberculosis 18 January 2018 | Q&A. https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/tuberculosis. Accessed 17 Dec 2020
WHO (2021) Global tuberculosis report 2021. World Health Organization, Geneva
WHO (2010) Guidelines for treatment of tuberculosis, 4th edn. World Health Organization, Geneva
Sotgiu G, Centis R, D’ambrosio L, Migliori GB (2015) Tuberculosis treatment and drug regimens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a017822
Miesel L, Rozwarski DA, Sacchettini JC, Jacobs Jr WR (1998) Mechanisms for isoniazid action and resistance. In: Genetics and tuberculosis. Wiley, pp 209–221
Sinha P, Srivastava GN, Tripathi R et al (2020) Detection of mutations in the rpoB gene of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains inhibiting wild type probe hybridization in the MTBDR plus assay by DNA sequencing directly from clinical specimens. BMC Microbiol 20:284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01967-5
Gopal P, Sarathy JP, Yee M et al (2020) Pyrazinamide triggers degradation of its target aspartate decarboxylase. Nat Commun 11:1661. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15516-1
Ramirez-Busby SM, Rodwell TC, Fink L et al (2017) A multinational analysis of mutations and heterogeneity in PZase, RpsA, and PanD associated with pyrazinamide resistance in M/XDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Rep 7:3790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03452-y
Goude R, Amin AG, Chatterjee D, Parish T (2009) The Arabinosyltransferase EmbC Is Inhibited by Ethambutol in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00162-09
Hards K, Robson JR, Berney M et al (2015) Bactericidal mode of action of bedaquiline. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:2028–2037. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv054
Degiacomi G, Sammartino JC, Sinigiani V, et al (2020) In vitro study of bedaquiline resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis multi-drug resistant clinical isolates. Front Microbiol 11:
Purwantini E, Mukhopadhyay B (2013) Rv0132c of Mycobacterium tuberculosis encodes a coenzyme F420-dependent hydroxymycolic acid dehydrogenase. PLoS ONE 8:e81985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081985
Singh R, Manjunatha U, Boshoff HIM et al (2008) PA-824 kills nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis by intracellular NO release. Science 322:1392–1395. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164571
Zahedi Bialvaei A, Rahbar M, Yousefi M et al (2017) Linezolid: a promising option in the treatment of Gram-positives. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:354–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw450
Wasserman S, Louw G, Ramangoaela L et al (2019) Linezolid resistance in patients with drug-resistant TB and treatment failure in South Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:2377–2384. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz206
Ruiz P, Rodríguez-Cano F, Zerolo FJ, Casal M (2002) Investigation of the in vitro activity of streptomycin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microb Drug Resist Larchmt N 8:147–149. https://doi.org/10.1089/107662902760190707
Jugheli L, Bzekalava N, de Rijk P et al (2009) High level of cross-resistance between kanamycin, amikacin, and capreomycin among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from georgia and a close relation with mutations in the rrs gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00851-09
Khoshnood S, Taki E, Sadeghifard N, et al (2021) Mechanism of action, resistance, synergism, and clinical implications of delamanid against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front Microbiol 12:
Cholo MC, Mothiba MT, Fourie B, Anderson R (2017) Mechanisms of action and therapeutic efficacies of the lipophilic antimycobacterial agents clofazimine and bedaquiline. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:338–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw426
Nimmo C, Millard J, van Dorp L et al (2020) Population-level emergence of bedaquiline and clofazimine resistance-associated variants among patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in southern Africa: a phenotypic and phylogenetic analysis. Lancet Microbe 1:e165–e174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30031-8
Aldred KJ, Blower TR, Kerns RJ et al (2016) Fluoroquinolone interactions with Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrase: enhancing drug activity against wild-type and resistant gyrase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E839. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525055113
Rokas A, Wisecaver JH, Lind AL (2018) The birth, evolution and death of metabolic gene clusters in fungi. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:731–744. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0075-3
Jakubczyk D, Dussart F (2020) Selected fungal natural products with antimicrobial properties. Molecules 25:911. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040911
Gouda S, Das G, Sen SK, et al (2016) Endophytes: A treasure house of bioactive compounds of medicinal importance. Front Microbiol 7
Sommart U, Rukachaisirikul V, Sukpondma Y et al (2008) Hydronaphthalenones and a dihydroramulosin from the endophytic fungus PSU-N24. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 56:1687–1690. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.56.1687
Bungihan ME, Tan MA, Kitajima M et al (2011) Bioactive metabolites of Diaporthe sp. P133, an endophytic fungus isolated from Pandanus amaryllifolius. J Nat Med 65:606–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11418-011-0518-x
Isaka M, Jaturapat A, Rukseree K et al (2001) Phomoxanthones A and B, novel xanthone dimers from the endophytic fungus phomopsis species. J Nat Prod 64:1015–1018. https://doi.org/10.1021/np010006h
Wijeratne EMK, He H, Franzblau SG et al (2013) Phomapyrrolidones A-C, antitubercular alkaloids from the endophytic fungus Phoma sp. NRRL 46751. J Nat Prod 76:1860–1865. https://doi.org/10.1021/np400391p
Ge HM, Zhang Q, Xu SH et al (2011) Chaetoglocins A-D, four new metabolites from the endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum. Planta Med 77:277–280. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1250292
Blais LA, ApSimon JW, Blackwell BA et al (1992) Isolation and characterization of enniatins from Fusarium avenaceum DAOM 196490. Can J Chem 70:1281–1287
Wang G, Dong W, Lu H et al (2020) Enniatin A1, a natural compound with bactericidal activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro. Molecules 25:38. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010038
Kumar V, Sarma VV, Thambugala KM, et al (2021) Ecology and evolution of marine fungi with their adaptation to climate change. Front Microbiol 12
Wang C, Wang J, Huang Y et al (2013) Anti-mycobacterial activity of marine fungus-derived 4-deoxybostrycin and nigrosporin. Molecules 18:1728–1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18021728
Sun C, Zhang Z, Ren Z et al (2020) Antibacterial cyclic tripeptides from antarctica-sponge-derived fungus Aspergillus insulicola HDN151418. Mar Drugs 18:532. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18110532
Pruksakorn P, Arai M, Kotoku N et al (2010) Trichoderins, novel aminolipopeptides from a marine sponge-derived Trichoderma sp., are active against dormant mycobacteria. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20:3658–3663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.04.100
Trisuwan K, Khamthong N, Rukachaisirikul V et al (2010) Anthraquinone, cyclopentanone, and naphthoquinone derivatives from the sea fan-derived fungi Fusarium spp. PSU-F14 and PSU-F135. J Nat Prod 73:1507–1511. https://doi.org/10.1021/np100282k
Bamisile BS, Akutse KS, Siddiqui JA, Xu Y (2021) Model application of entomopathogenic fungi as alternatives to chemical pesticides: prospects, challenges, and insights for next-generation sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci 12
Vongvanich N, Kittakoop P, Isaka M et al (2002) Hirsutellide A, a New Antimycobacterial Cyclohexadepsipeptide from the Entomopathogenic Fungus Hirsutella kobayasii. J Nat Prod 65:1346–1348. https://doi.org/10.1021/np020055+
Isaka M, Palasarn S, Sriklung K, Kocharin K (2005) Cyclohexadepsipeptides from the insect pathogenic fungus Hirsutella nivea BCC 2594. J Nat Prod 68:1680–1682. https://doi.org/10.1021/np050246n
Nilanonta C, Isaka M, Kittakoop P et al (2000) Antimycobacterial and antiplasmodial cyclodepsipeptides from the insect pathogenic fungus Paecilomyces tenuipes BCC 1614. Planta Med 66:756–758. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-9776
Kornsakulkarn J, Thongpanchang C, Lapanun S, Srichomthong K (2009) Isocoumarin glucosides from the scale insect fungus Torrubiella tenuis BCC 12732. J Nat Prod 72:1341–1343. https://doi.org/10.1021/np900082h
Nilanonta C, Isaka M, Chanphen R et al (2003) Unusual enniatins produced by the insect pathogenic fungus Verticillium hemipterigenum: isolation and studies on precursor-directed biosynthesis. Tetrahedron 59:1015–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(02)01631-9
Vongvilai P, Isaka M, Kittakoop P et al (2004) Isolation and structure elucidation of enniatins L, M1, M2, and N: novel hydroxy analogs. Helv Chim Acta 87:2066–2073. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.200490185
Eymann C, Lassek C, Wegner U et al (2017) Symbiotic interplay of fungi, algae, and bacteria within the lung lichen Lobaria pulmonaria L. Hoffm. as assessed by state-of-the-art metaproteomics. J Proteome Res 16:2160–2173. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00974
Seephonkai P, Isaka M, Kittakoop P et al (2002) Evaluation of antimycobacterial, antiplasmodial and cytotoxic activities of preussomerins isolated from the lichenicolous fungus Microsphaeropsis sp. BCC 3050. Planta Med 68:45–48. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-20055
Srinivasan M, Shanmugam K, Kedike B et al (2020) Trypethelone and phenalenone derivatives isolated from the mycobiont culture of Trypethelium eluteriae Spreng. and their anti-mycobacterial properties. Nat Prod Res 34:3320–3327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2019.1566823
Beelman RB, Kalaras MD, Richie JPJ (2019) Micronutrients and bioactive compounds in mushrooms: a recipe for healthy aging? Nutr Today 54:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/NT.0000000000000315
Venturella G, Ferraro V, Cirlincione F, Gargano ML (2021) Medicinal mushrooms: bioactive compounds, use, and clinical trials. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020634
Frąc M, Hannula SE, Bełka M, Jędryczka M (2018) Fungal biodiversity and their role in soil health. Front Microbiol 9
Kanokmedhakul S, Kanokmedhakul K, Prajuabsuk T et al (2003) A bioactive triterpenoid and vulpinic acid derivatives from the mushroom Scleroderma citrinum. Planta Med 69:568–571. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-40639
Arpha K, Phosri C, Suwannasai N et al (2012) Astraodoric acids A-D: new lanostane triterpenes from edible mushroom astraeus odoratus and their anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra and cytotoxic activity. J Agric Food Chem 60:9834–9841. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf302433r
Centko RM, Ramón-García S, Taylor T et al (2012) Ramariolides A-D, antimycobacterial butenolides isolated from the mushroom ramaria cystidiophora. J Nat Prod 75:2178–2182. https://doi.org/10.1021/np3006277
Koyama N, Kojima S, Fukuda T et al (2010) Structure and total synthesis of fungal calpinactam, a new antimycobacterial agent. Org Lett 12:432–435. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol902553z
Rajachan O, Kanokmedhakul K, Sanmanoch W et al (2016) Chevalone C analogues and globoscinic acid derivatives from the fungus Neosartorya spinosa KKU-1NK1. Phytochemistry 132:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.09.008
Dettrakul S, Kittakoop P, Isaka M et al (2003) Antimycobacterial pimarane diterpenes from the Fungus Diaporthe sp. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 13:1253–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-894X(03)00111-2
Holdgate GA, Meek TD, Grimley RL (2018) Mechanistic enzymology in drug discovery: a fresh perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discov 17:115–132. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.219
Robertson JG (2005) Mechanistic basis of enzyme-targeted drugs. Biochemistry 44:5561–5571. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi050247e
Ruddraraju KV, Aggarwal D, Zhang Z-Y (2021) Therapeutic targeting of protein tyrosine phosphatases from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microorganisms 9:14. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9010014
Chen D, Liu L, Lu Y, Chen S (2021) Identification of fusarielin M as a novel inhibitor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein tyrosine phosphatase B (MptpB). Bioorganic Chem 106:104495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104495
Xiao Z, Lin S, Tan C et al (2015) Asperlones A and B, dinaphthalenone derivatives from a mangrove endophytic fungus Aspergillus sp. 16–5C. Mar Drugs 13:366–378. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13010366
Li H, Jiang J, Liu Z et al (2014) Peniphenones A-D from the mangrove fungus Penicillium dipodomyicola HN4-3A as Inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Phosphatase MptpB. J Nat Prod 77:800–806. https://doi.org/10.1021/np400880w
Liu X, Song F, Ma L et al (2013) Sydowiols A-C: Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors from an East China Sea marine-derived fungus, Aspergillus sydowii. Tetrahedron Lett 54:6081–6083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.08.137
Jamaati H, Mortaz E, Pajouhi Z, et al (2017) Nitric oxide in the pathogenesis and treatment of tuberculosis. Front Microbiol 8
Darwin KH, Ehrt S, Gutierrez-Ramos J-C et al (2003) The Proteasome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is required for resistance to nitric oxide. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091176
Lin G, Li D, Chidawanyika T et al (2010) Fellutamide B is a potent inhibitor of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome. Arch Biochem Biophys 501:214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2010.06.009
Kuroda Y, Nicacio KJ, da Silva-Jr IA et al (2018) Isolation, synthesis and bioactivity studies of phomactin terpenoids. Nat Chem 10:938–945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0084-x
Kavanagh F, Hervey A, Robbins WJ (1951) Antibiotic Substances From Basidiomycetes: VIII. Pleurotus Multilus (Fr.) Sacc. and Pleurotus Passeckerianus Pilat. Proc Natl Acad Sci 37:570–574. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.37.9.570
Lemieux MR, Siricilla S, Mitachi K et al (2018) An antimycobacterial pleuromutilin analogue effective against dormant bacilli. Bioorg Med Chem 26:4787–4796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2018.07.034
Chew KL, Octavia S, Yeoh SF, Teo JWP (2021) MIC values of iclaprim and lefamulin against mycobacterium abscessus complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e0061921. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00619-21
Chinthanom P, Vichai V, Dokladda K et al (2021) Semisynthetic modifications of antitubercular lanostane triterpenoids from Ganoderma. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 74:435–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-021-00422-5
Hou X-M, Liang T-M, Guo Z-Y et al (2019) Discovery, absolute assignments, and total synthesis of asperversiamides A-C and their potent activity against Mycobacterium marinum. Chem Commun 55:1104–1107. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CC09347D
Chao R, Hou X-M, Xu W-F et al (2021) Targeted isolation of asperheptatides from a coral-derived fungus using LC-MS/MS-based molecular networking and antitubercular activities of modified cinnamate derivatives. J Nat Prod 84:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00804
Auffan M, Rose J, Bottero J-Y et al (2009) Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat Nanotechnol 4:634–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.242
Salata OV (2004) Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J Nanobiotechnology 2:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-2-3
Jeevanandam J, Barhoum A, Chan YS et al (2018) Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 9:1050–1074. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.98
Nasrollahzadeh M, Sajadi SM, Sajjadi M, Issaabadi Z (2019) Chapter 4: applications of nanotechnology in daily life. In: Nasrollahzadeh M, Sajadi SM, Sajjadi M et al (eds) Interface science and technology. Elsevier, pp 113–143
Huang L, Lemos HP, Li L et al (1950) (2012) Engineering DNA nanoparticles as immunomodulatory reagents that activate regulatory T cells. J Immunol Baltim Md 188:4913–4920. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1103668
Slavin YN, Asnis J, Häfeli UO, Bach H (2017) Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. J Nanobiotechnology 15:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0308-z
Majhi KC, Yadav M (2021) Chapter 5: Synthesis of inorganic nanomaterials using carbohydrates. In: Inamuddin, Boddula R, Ahamed MI, Asiri AM (eds) Green sustainable process for chemical and environmental engineering and science. Elsevier, pp 109–135
Roy N, Gaur A, Jain A et al (2013) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: An approach to overcome toxicity. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 36:807–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2013.07.005
Li Q, Liu F, Li M et al (2021) Nanoparticle and nanomineral production by fungi. Fungal Biol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2021.07.003
Banu A, Rathod V (2013) Biosynthesis of monodispersed silver nanoparticles and their activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Nanomedicine Biotherapeutic Discov 3:1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-983X.1000110
Sivaraj A, Kumar V, Sunder R et al (2020) Commercial Yeast Extracts Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Chloride Nanoparticles and their Anti-mycobacterial Activity. J Clust Sci 31:287–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-019-01626-4
Fan Y, Pauer AC, Gonzales AA, Fenniri H (2019) Enhanced antibiotic activity of ampicillin conjugated to gold nanoparticles on PEGylated rosette nanotubes. Int J Nanomedicine 14:7281–7289. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S209756
Danaraj J, Periakaruppan R, Usha R, et al (2022) Chapter 15 - Mycogenic nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterizations and applications. In: Abd-Elsalam KA, Periakaruppan R, Rajeshkumar S (eds) Agri-Waste and Microbes for Production of Sustainable Nanomaterials. Elsevier, pp 357–373
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Prof. Tamara Robinson and Stellenbosch University for supporting the study.
Funding
This work was supported by the South African Medical Research Association (SAMRC), Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research (CBTBR) and the National Research Foundation (NRF) [NRF GRANT UID129364].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KIT collected the data and wrote the manuscript. KN, LB, MK, LM, LS, NA, AL, RME and VM edited the manuscript and gave critical comments. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tapfuma, K.I., Nyambo, K., Baatjies, L. et al. Fungal-derived compounds and mycogenic nanoparticles with antimycobacterial activity: a review. SN Appl. Sci. 4, 134 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05010-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05010-2