Abstract
Owed to their simplicity, flexibility, lightweight, and low cost, plastics have become highly demanded in Africa as well as worldwide. However, the management of plastic wastes, particularly in African countries, is inadequate and most of the plastic debris is gatewayed into the water bodies. Nowadays, environmentalists, organizations, and governments are aware of microplastic pollution in the marine and terrestrial environment. Thus, addressing a compressive literature review in one referenced paper, as they draw up the articles, is essential to propose new research directions, to synthesize the existing theories among the existing studies. The abundance of microplastics is variable depending on the sampling and identification techniques. In this review, the available publications on microplastic pollution in African countries’ water systems were retrieved. Investigations found that microplastic pollution levels in the studied water bodies were reported in high concentrations. It was observed that different sampling and analytical methods were applied for the detection of microplastics, and suggestions were raised at it may affect the reliability of the results. Most of the detected and quantified microplastics were confirmed as they are from secondary sources. Most of the microplastic pollution research was conducted dominantly in South Africa, and secondly Nigeria, although other countries should also start conducting in their water systems. Surface water and sediment samples were dominantly carried out, but are limited with biota samples; hence, the risk assessment of microplastics is not yet determined. Some of the African countries have regulations on the prevention of macroplastic wastes, but the implementations are unsuccessful and most have not yet been established resulting in a threat of microplastics pollution. Thus, the research priorities on microplastic detection should be identified, and the African countries’ governments should be more proactive in eradicating macroplastic, which ends up as microplastics, pollutions in the water environments.
Graphic abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42452-021-04619-z/MediaObjects/42452_2021_4619_Figa_HTML.png)
Article Highlights
-
Researches on microplastic pollution in African countries water system is limited .
-
A high microplastics abundance is found in African countries water system.
-
Sampling methods and used analytical techniques for microplastic detection were included.
-
Harmonized standard methods for microplastic pollution research should be established.
-
Combined analytical tools at once should be adopted to detect reliable microplastics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Investigations of the microplastics (MPs) occurrence (fragmented from macroplastic wastes and primary microplastic sources manufactured as microfibers and others) were reportedly found. An estimated amount of 275 million metric tons that produced in 192 coastal countries since 2010, out of this 4.8 to 12.7 million metric tons of plastic waste ended up in the ocean, were reported (Jambeck et al. 2015). Approximately 6300 million metric tons of plastic waste had been generated globally as of 2015, and around 9 and 12% had been recycled and incinerated, respectively. The rest of the plastic wastes, around 79%, have been disposed of in landfills and/or discarded in the natural environment (Geyer et al. 2017). Not only the inadequate disposal of single-use plastics, source of MPs, but also the fabric nanofibers from the personal protective equipment (PPE), such as medical face masks and hands-on gloves, are important sources in the water systems that required attention as emerging research needs (Aragaw 2020; De-la-Torre and Aragaw 2021), such as the sources, occurrences, distribution of MPs, and the risk assessments to the aquatic biota are required as prior research. As a result, the aquatic environment is prone to become MPs sink by different transportation mechanisms.
Recently, the MPs have been recognized and attracted attention as emerging contaminants in the aquatic system. MP pollutants in the environment were first attempted in the early 1970 s and later described by marine biologists since 2004 (Thompson et al. 2004). The research output and efforts increased enormously as compared with lines of research. MPs (< 5 mm in size) may be the polymeric plastic materials that originate through fragmentation of macroplastics used in many personal care products, called secondary MP sources. In addition, the primary sources are those in which they are deliberately manufactured through extrusion or other techniques to be used as an ancestor to other products and/or direct uses are an important source for MPs pollution (Browne 2015). Commonly manufactured products of primary MPs are plastic pellets; abrasives, synthetic fibers (Hidalgo-Ruz et al. 2012). The occurrence and abundance, and quality of MPs have been investigated in different aquatic environments including sediments, and wastewaters worldwide both in the urban and remote areas. Dominantly, studies investigating MPs have mostly failed to assess the pollution in the terrestrial and soil environments. However, recent reports also considered the assessments of MPs pollution in the terrestrial and soil environments in such a way that the agrochemicals could be a potential source for the pollution of MPs (Dioses-Salinas et al. 2020). Attention has been raised by the environmentalists due to the adverse impacts of MPs on the natural environment and aquatic biota. Higher organisms (e.g., fish) and microorganisms in the aquatic system can ingest MPs and obstruct or suffer from starvation due to pseudo satiety (Cole et al. 2011). The ingested toxic chemicals leached by MPs could reach human beings through the food chain (Hermabessiere et al. 2017). Besides its impact, MPs can act as vectors for the transport of other toxic chemicals, such as Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs), and heavy metals, among others by different chemical and/or physical mechanisms (e.g., adsorbing toxic materials on the surface of MPs) (Wardrop et al. 2016). The evidence in the globe has found that humans are exposed to xenobiotic contaminated seafood through ingestion which is unavoidable and ultimately can cause a risk to food security as well as the human health problem (De-la-Torre 2020). Moreover, the spatial and temporal variations in the trophic transfer systems and mechanisms of MPs, and the potential risks to high trophic levels of animals have been reported by Farrell and Nelson (2013), Setälä et al. (2014), Shi et al. (2018).
Africa is a developing continent that needs a large demand for plastic products due to their low cost and easy availability. China is the largest plastic polymer producer which produces 31% as of 2019 out of the global plastic production, 368 million metric tons worldwide, and is the highest export destination in Africa (PlasticEurope 2020). Although Africa has been developing rapidly and consumed large amounts of plastic products in their economic development in the past few decades, there is a lack of plastic waste management practices and plastic pollution awareness among the general public. Thus, the freshwater and marine environment in Africa are at risk of MP pollution.
Research on the MPs pollution started lately in African as compared with other continents. In 2016, the first work on MP pollution in the African Great Lakes, particularly from Lake Victoria, Nile perch, and Nile tilapia was reported by Biginagwa et al. (2016). Global Sampling of Sediment from Shores for MPs accumulation study, and South African were included as one of the shores, recorded as the first report in African waster system (Browne et al. 2011). Even in some countries, like Ethiopia having the longest river (Blue Nile), Lakes, Lake Tana, and several small lakes and/or rivers in the rift valley, almost none of the researches has been conducted on MPs till now. In 2020, the first study on microplastic pollution assessments in Lake Ziway, Ethiopia, was reported by Merga et al. (2020). Recently, environmental concerns in African countries on microplastic pollution research have attracted attention, and investigation has been increasingly reported in rivers, bays, lakes, and seas. As a result, this review aimed to assess the current research on microplastic pollution in African countries aquatic environment; deliberate the sources, transport systems, and active regulations regarding MP pollution; evaluate the potential impacts of MP pollution in Africa’s aquatic system, and identify the research problems and research directives in the future. Moreover, this review could address compressive literature in one referenced paper, as they draw up the articles, is essential to propose new research directions, to synthesize the existing theories among the existing studies.
2 Data acquisition strategies and treatment
A literature search was conducted in June 2020, to retrieve articles on MP pollution from the African water system. An all-inclusive materials retrieval was performed using all accessible databases, including Web of Science (https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science/), Scopus (https://www.scopus.com), and PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) databases; and Mendeley, ResearchGate, and Google Scholar scientific sources. Search keywords included were “microplastics AND Africa,” “plastic debris AND Africa,” “plastic AND marine pollution AND Africa,” “Africa AND water bodies.” The retrieved publications, such as research articles, review articles, case studies, technical reports, short communications, and books were screened by country and type of water system, categorized based on research scopes (identification, quantification, abundance, and occurrence), and studies only in Africa’s water systems (including across countries worldwide associated with African countries’ water system), such as rivers, lakes, oceans, and gulfs and bays were selected. The impact of MPs on fauna from Africa’s water systems was also included. A potential, and detailed studies of the identification and detection of MPs in the water system, excluding editorials, pathway modeling publications, and news, were reviewed with a total of 33 articles as from Table 1, and also 1 article focusing on the policies for the reduction of single-use plastics in Africa were retrieved.
3 Sampling techniques, MPs preparations, and detection methods
The sampling techniques, MPs separation methods, and instrumental tools used for quantification and identification of the MPs pollution have been investigated in lakes, rivers, estuaries, and coastline in African countries’ water systems. Most of the sampling techniques and MPs preparation procedures from the retrieved publications are similar, and the flowchart that summarized the sampling, treatment, and identification methods is shown in Fig. 1. In this review, the type of samples that were studied were water, sediment, and biotic (insects and fish), and the methods used are almost similar. That is, the saturated salt solutions (with different densities) were used for the inorganic impurities separation, eventually, density separation with flotation is carried out. Different mineral acids/bases and hydrogen peroxide were used for the oxidation/digestion of organic impurities. Usually, all type of samples is collected from the water system, and physical separations (especially for the fish sample is important to separate external shells). Different instrumental analytical techniques were used, and the advantages and disadvantages of each are summarized in Table 2.
3.1 Sample techniques
Even though the studies on microplastics pollution research have been performed for years, the sampling techniques, extraction and/purification, quantification, and qualification methods are not yet standardized to date. Investigated reports from different studies worldwide as well as reviewed literature in this study are confirmed that significantly varied techniques were used and cannot be easily compared to each other. There are two sampling methods, in general, in the MPs identification of various samples. These are volume-reduced and bulk sampling techniques (Hidalgo-Ruz et al. 2012) for sediment and water samples. But, the manual gathering and boating techniques for fauna (insects, larvae, and fish species) sample ad been employed as shown in Table 1. In the volume-reduced sampling, the volume of the water in the sample has been reduced directly with direct onsite sampling, but not in the bulk sampling. “Neuston plankton net” and “manta trawl net” approaches are the two commonly used techniques for volume-reduced sampling, mostly applied for surface water sampling. As compared with volume-reduced sampling, bulk sampling techniques have not been employed for surface waters due to MPs may have a lower density than water, and floats on top of the water. Manta trawl approaches can be applied to collect surface water samples in such a way that a flow meter is used to calculate the entire volume filtered through the mesh and the total volume of water can be determined (Rocha-Santos and Duarte 2015; Free et al. 2014). Most of the studies selectively had been used nets having 0.333 or 0.350 mm mesh size, proposed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of USA, to concentrate topwater samples mostly due to MPs could be appropriate in these rang (Arthur et al. 2009). Using the trawl approaches is advantageous due to it can cover huge sampling areas and effective volume-reduced samplings and accurate estimation of MPs can be obtained, rather than the bulk sampling techniques which can provide only a crude estimate of the number of MPs at a site. However, the trawl sampling approaches have not effective during the dry season where water levels become low, rather it is effective in the wet seasons (Weideman et al. 2020). This is due to deploying the net where the water levels high enough to be the techniques that are effective for optimum detections of MPs as a representative in the studied location. Even though different scholars worldwide have been used different mesh sizes, such as 0.080 mm by Galgani et al. (2013), and 0.450-mm mesh size (Dris et al. 2015), a greater difference in the abundance of MPs can always be observed. In this review, the different abundance of MPs was observed by using the nylon mesh size of 0.333 mm (Naidoo and Glassom 2019), nylon net mesh size of 0.5 mm (Nel et al. 2018), the neuston net with the mesh size of 0.3 mm (Vilakati et al. 2020), neuston net with a mesh size of 0.300 mm (Ilechukwu et al. 2019), zooplankton net with a 0.3-mm mesh size (Naidoo et al. 2015) as shown from Table 1. Most of the other studies used in this review were not defined as the mesh size of the nets yet. Thus, the harmonized sampling techniques and defined mesh size attracting researchers’ attention for findings to compare the data credibility and reliability. In addition to the common manta trawl methods, bulk water sampling approaches are also used. Many of the reports worldwide on the volumes of water samples in the bulk sampling techniques are compared as high as 100 L (Song et al. 2014), but, there are limited reports with 100 mL and 2 L volumes by Dubaish and Liebezeit (2013), Leslie et al. (2017), and the results are significantly different. In this review, 100 L of bulk water samples (Dahms et al. 2020), 188.692 L water samples (Nel and Froneman 2015) were reported and had a significant difference in the MPs occurrence, sizes, and type of polymers. Even some of the reports used a continuous intake of pumping from the water system to a laboratory with defined flow rates (Kanhai et al. 2017). In general, the MP particles distribution, abundance, particle length, and polymeric types and compositions (PS, PE, PP, etc.) are highly dependent on sampling techniques. Even, it is not proper to apply the same sampling techniques for the different aquatic MPs (ocean, seas, reservoirs, lake, and river). From this, it can be deduced that varied values of the mean abundance of MPs found in the water system may not be representative to the studied locations, and an urgent standard sampling technique development for water sampling I required.
3.2 Sample extraction and separation
Before identification, and quantifications of MPs, extraction and/ or purifications for impurity removal are a critical step. This is very important to separate the unwanted matrix surrounding and/or within the MPs resulted in the sample quantifications and qualifications become reliable. Because, most, MPs density is lower than the water density, separation with density difference is a frequently used approach. Mixing of the sample of interest with the defined density saturated solutions is mostly employed. Saturated sodium chloride (NaCl) is commonly used due to its low cost and negligible toxicity to humans, and the environment (Browne et al. 2011; Claessens et al. 2011). In this review, almost all of the reports were used saturated NaCl solutions for the density separation of MP particles, floats on top of the surface, as shown in Table 1. Depending on the type of MPs constituent polymer type (such as polyvinyl chloride, polyoxymethylene, and others) that they have higher density, the saturated NaCl solution cannot be appropriate. Density separation techniques have the capability for the low-density MP particles to float to the surface of the water by settling down the coarse (e.g., clay, sand, silts), and high-density materials. As a result, the floated MPs could be taken out for subsequent experimentation. Even though there are its own hazardous, economic affordability, and separation efficiency issue, different studies by using other salts which have high density have been found for density separation of MP particles, such as sodium polytungstate (SPT) solution having a density of 1.4–1.5 kg/L (Corcoran 2015), calcium chloride having a density value of 1.3 kg/L (Stolte et al. 2015), and sodium iodide (NaI) solutions having a density of 1.8 kg/L (Nuelle et al. 2014). The separation approach by the combination of fluidization with flotation techniques after vigorous stirring is effective, and 80 to 100% of MP particles yield could be obtained (Ivleva et al. 2017). Among the different strategies for efficient separations of MPs, fluidization by NaCl solution with subsequent floatation with other high-density salt solution (e.g., NaI) is by far an effective recovery technique (Nuelle et al. 2014).
Besides the salt solution separation approaches, another important, and effective instrumental separation technique (especially efficient for larger particles in sediment samples), namely Munich Plastic Sediment Separator, has developed. This instrument has been working in combination with the use of the ZnCl2 solution which has a recovery rate of up to 96 to 100% (Imhof et al. 2012). Another apparatus called elutriation and floatation apparatus, which is important for the separation techniques have been reportedly used. The elutriation technique is effective (efficiency of 94 to 98%) for the separations of MPs from the sediment samples in the aquatic environment (Claessens et al. 2013). Also, the elutriation processes have their drawbacks which are inefficient MPs separations in the wastewater due to high concentrations of organic contaminants in that the density difference between the MPs and other particles within the matrices is insignificant.
Another important process after extraction for the effective identification and analysis of MPs is the oxidation and/or digestion process. The organic removal processes can be categorized into chemical degradation and enzymatic degradation. These processes have been used to remove interfering organic tissues and inorganic dust also. In this review, the degradation of impurities in the samples was found oxidation with potassium hydroxide (KOH) (Sparks 2020; Adika et al. 2020; Shabaka et al. 2020; Dahms et al. 2020), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Adeogun et al. 2020; Oni et al. 2020; Vilakati et al. 2020), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (Biginagwa et al. 2016). KOH and H2O2 are most popular and reportedly found in the retrieved literature as well as worldwide used for effective treatment processes as an oxidizing agent. This is due to having negligible drawbacks for the damage of MP particles. Another report found that a combination of different chemicals; hydrogen peroxide with alkaline base (H2O2 with KOH) were used for the oxidation of impurities (Akindele et al. 2020), and the purification of MP particles from the matrix (Tata et al. 2020) in different samples. A critical selection of the oxidizing agents is an important issue for the effective detection of all the MP particles and components that only degrades the organic matter without degrading plastics. Reports confirm that different mineral acids such as HNO3 and HCl as strong oxidizing agents were used to digest the biological tissues of fish and shellfish but may destroy and/or damage the chemical and structural characteristics of MPs at low pH values (Cole et al. 2014). Ended, scholars recommended that the 10% of KOH solution is an effective alkaline treatment agent for the digestions of biological tissues without degrading the polymers (Dehaut et al. 2016). Particularly, polymers synthesized from the amide monomers, for example, polyamide plastics can be destructed and degraded with HNO3 solutions. In this review, one report is found thatHNO3 was used for the digestion process for the separation of MPs (Nel et al. 2018). Conversely, hydrochloric acid which is non-oxidizing acids are inefficient for the digestion process at low concentrations, and temperature and huge organic residue could be produced also. Another important approach to remove or reduce the organic matter is enzymatic digestion processes. The samples containing MPs can be incubated with a single and/or mixtures of enzymes, such as lipase, amylase, proteinase, chitinase, and cellulose, with the corresponding protein, lipid organics (Cole et al. 2014), and carbohydrate organics (Löder et al. 2015). Enzymatic degradation could remove high percentage organic materials, especially in plankton-rich samples. Particularly, the seawater samples are required with enzymatic digestion capable within a few hrs. In this review, one report was found that the use of proteinase K enzymatic for the digestion organic materials during the MPs separation (Naidoo et al. 2020).
Another digestion process is by using the combinations of ultra-sonication with a salt solution, particularly sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (Enders et al. 2015). But, there is one critical limitation in this process. This is, the tiny MPs could be generated from the plastic samples, particularly plastic which has low elasticity properties, i.e., easily brittle plastic materials (Bergmann et al. 2016). It can be concluded that each approach during the separations of MPs for different samples has its pros and cons. Therefore, the combination of different purification processes should still be used for the maximum percentage recovery of MPs, and some optimization in the sample purification still needs to be further investigated.
3.3 Identification and detection techniques
In this review, different instrumental analytical techniques, dominantly Fourier transform infrared spectroscope (FTIR), and microscopic visualization was carried out for the identification and detections of MP polymeric types as shown in Table 1. Only one report was found that thermal technique (differential scanning calorimetric, DSC) had been employed for the identifications of polymer types (Shabaka et al. 2020). Interestingly, one study had used a combination of different instrumental techniques for effective quantification and qualifications of MPs from the marine water samples (Vilakati et al. 2020). This study was used chromatographic-mass spectrometry (pyrolysis GC-MS) techniques for the determinations of pyrolytic polymer products, and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS) to analyze the morphological and elemental distribution of MP particles, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) for the determination of thermal fragmentation properties, and FTIR for functional group spectral analysis.
Analysis and/or quantification of MPs is conducted after different debris, planktons, and other organic or inorganic matrices are purified. The physical methods of identification by visual categorization based on their size, shape, and color are the first important steps. This is very important to select which instrumental techniques is appropriate for identification and quantification of them based on their polymer types (Rochman et al. 2015), particle sizes, and structural feature (Qiu et al. 2016). But, microscopic visualization accuracy depends on the extraction, and purification techniques, because other similar particles with their size and shape (e.g., planktons, inorganic clays) may be counting as MP particles. Thus, other identification techniques, spectroscopic, and microscopic technical approaches are mandatory. Especially, for smaller MP particles, instrumental tools for effective identification are required. Identifications of MPs by visual sorting could be affected by several factors, such as personal errors, the counting device quality resulted in approximately 70% of error rates could be observed (Hidalgo-Ruz et al. 2012). Recently, investigative research on MPs analysis reportedly uses chromatographic, and spectroscopic approaches as effective quantifications, and qualifications techniques. Among the widely used instrumentals tools: (1) Chromatographic techniques (Nuelle et al. 2014), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in the pyrolysis working process (Hintersteiner et al. 2015), and liquid chromatography (Elert et al. 2017). (2) Spectroscopic techniques (Ivleva et al. 2017); Raman spectroscopy (Zhao et al. 2017), and FTIR spectroscopy (Imhof et al. 2016). Each instrumental techniques have their limitations and merits (Qiu et al. 2016). The most popularly used instrumental analytical techniques with their merits and demerits are provided as shown in Table 2. Particularly, micro-Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (µFTIR) and Attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) is very important, and frequently used due to the ability of simultaneous visualization, mapping, and collections of IR spectra (Wiesheu et al. 2016).
4 The occurrence of microplastics in African countries aquatic systems
The abundance of MPs can be quantified with different units depending on the sample and sampling types. For example, surface water, sediments, and biota samples can be quantified as items/L, items/kg, and items per individual, respectively (Yuan et al. 2019). Sometimes, it can be enumerated with a percentage (Vilakati et al. 2020). County-wise, 7 publications from Nigeria water bodies next to South Africa (18 publications) were found and retrieved in this review. The very limited researches on the MPs pollution in the water system, one publication for each, was found from Tunisia, Tanzania, Egypt, Algeria, Ghana, and Ethiopia. Almost all other countries in Africa have not yet conducted MPs pollution research on their water systems including Ethiopia which has the biggest Lake and River (Lake Tana and Blue Nile River). In this review, dominantly the gulf, bays, and coastline of oceans and/or seas and Harbor location in the water system researches were reportedly investigated. Reports only in three Lakes, Ox-Bow Lake, Eleyele Lake, and Lake Victoria were found.
4.1 The occurrence of microplastics in lakes
The great lakes have been formed at the end of the glacial period 14, 000 years ago in such a way that the ice sheet is treated and exposed to the basins which had been carved into the land, eventually filled out with melted. Mostly, there are shallow areas that could be up-flow filled and drained by groundwater based on groundwater balance. Also, rainfall and the nearby rivers are sources for Lake waters. Thus, the source of plastic waste in the Lake is come from runoffs, rivers, and municipal and industrial effluents, and accumulated from the surface water as well as the sediments depending on the plastic densities. In African Countries’ lakes, MPs pollution has been reported in Lake Eleyele from Nigeria, Lake Victoria from the coast of Tanzania, Oxbow Lake from Nigeria urban lakes, and Lake Ziway from Ethiopia. In Oxbow Lake, the abundance is significantly varied from 1004 to 8329 items m− 3 and 201 to 8369 items m− 3 for the dry and rainy season, respectively, in surface water with different sampling sites. From the surface sediment, 347 to 4031 items kg−1 and 507 to 7593 items kg−1 were recorded in the dry and rainy season, respectively (Oni et al. 2020). In Lake Ziway, the abundance was found with varied range across different sampling zones (0.0002–385.2 mg/k WW in fish), and (400–124,000 particles/m3) in sediment samples (Merga et al. 2020). These varied ranges are attributed to the varied feed sources of the plastics to the Lake. The seasonal variations in the MPs abundance arise due to the lack of proper sewage management and unselective dumping around the site, and also, the farming and fishing activities which contributes a significant variation. Based on the sample site perspective, the sites where the boat station near the coast have been observed higher MP abundance as compared with other sites. Also, the MPs distribution where the site near the lakeshore was detected in high abundance is due to recreational tourism-related plastic goods that could contribute a huge abundance (Zhang et al. 2018). In conclusion, the wide ranges in MP abundance detected in different sample types could be due to human activities, waste management practices, geographic location of sampling sites. Moreover, it could be due to the sampling techniques, and detection methods.
4.2 The occurrence of microplastics in rivers
Rivers, large or small, are natural streams that flow through a channel in the surface of the ground, eventually goes into other water bodies (ocean, lakes, sea, rivers, and sometimes into groundwater). As compared with other water systems, rivers, are important transporters of wastes, in the present case plastic wastes, and they are the most important feeder of MPs into the marine water system (Lebreton et al. 2017). Quantification and identification of MPs had been studied in ten different rivers with different geographical regions from South Africa and Nigeria. Ogun and Osun rivers from Nigeria; Obiaraedu, Nwangele, Okumpi, Ogbajarajara, and Onuezuze Rivers from southeastern Nigeria; Jukskei River, Orange-Vaal River, Bloukrans River from South Africa were studied. MP pollution in River Jukskei from water and sediment samples at the urban streams have been studied and recorded different values in different sampling sites. The mean values of MPs are recorded as 705 particles m− 3 in water, and 166.8 particles kg−1 in sediment samples (Dahms et al. 2020). The MP pollution from the Rivers Obiaraedu, Nwangele, Okumpi, Ogbajarajara, and Onuezuze from southeastern Nigeria was reported in one research article. The MP abundance were recorded as 3487 items/m2; 469 ± 153.33 items/m2 (downstream); 85.8 ± 174.94 items/m2 (midstream); 211.4 ± 109.84 items/m2 (upstream) (Ebere et al. 2019). The highest abundance of MP downstream could be the feed small rivers carrier plastic wastes and end up at the downstream of the big river where the samples were taken. Average MP abundance was recorded as 1.7 ± 5.1 L−1 equivalently > 99% fibers in Orange-Vaal River, south African water samples independent of sites, and confirmed that the river is highly polluted (Weideman et al. 2020). The MP abundance in Bloukrans River, South Africa from sediment samples was potentially studied in other rivers. The mean abundances were recorded as 160.1 ± 139.5 MP particles kg−1 in sediment samples independent of the season (Nel et al. 2018). In general, all the studied samples from all geographical areas river waters system confirmed that highly polluted with MP particles.
4.3 The occurrence of microplastics in ocean/sea coastlines and bays
The coastlines, sometimes called seashores are the lines that form the boundary between the land and the ocean/sea. The oceans are not freshwater, rather marine environments that are highly important for shipping transportation. The well-known and biggest seas and oceans in Africa are the Mediterranean Sea, and the Atlantic Ocean, respectively. Sea and oceans are the highest-end receptors of plastic debris that comes from other water bodies (lakes, rivers, ponds, and reservoirs. In this review, dominantly the identification and quantification of MPs are reported from the bays and coastlines of seas/oceans. Twenty types of research out of 32 publications on the MPs pollution research in the sea/ocean coastline, estuary, gulf, and bays have been reported as illustrated in Table 1. Three studies of bays, gulfs, and coastlines from the Mediterranean Sea in Tunisian (Shabaka et al. 2020), Egypt, and Algeria coast were first reported (Tata et al. 2020). The identification of MPs pollution from sediment samples on the Tunisian coast in the Mediterranean Sea was first reported (Abidli et al. 2018). The abundance of microplastic in the sediment was found in varied ranges (141.20 ± 25.98 to 461.25 ± 29.74 items kg−1 DW) in different sampling sites. The occurrence of MPs in this study is for the first time on the Tunisian coast of the Mediterranean Sea and results showed that extensively polluted. In Algeria, the occurrence and characterizations of MPs from the North African coasts of the Mediterranean Sea were studied (Tata et al. 2020). The varied range on MPs abundances was recorded as 182.66 ± 27.32 to 649.33 ± 184.02 kg−1 dry weight (DW) in different sampling locations. The MPs pollution in the Gulf and Bay of sediment Core samples from the Asia and Africa border have been identified (Matsuguma et al. 2017). The mean abundance was found as 1750 pieces/kg-dry in the sediment core. The plastic debris and the corresponding MPs have been identified from urban estuaries of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa in different sampling zones (Naidoo et al. 2015). The mean average abundance was found at 745.4 ± 129.7 particles per 500 ml. The highest abundance was recorded in the Bayhead area, and the smallest plastic concentration was found at sampling sites away from the city center. A quantitative analysis of MPs from sediment and water samples on the southeastern coastline of South Africa has been reported (Nel and Froneman 2015). The abundance was recorded in a range from 688.9 ± 348.2 to 3308 ± 1449 particles m− 2 for sediment samples, and 257.9 ± 53.36 to 1215 ± 276.7 particles m− 3 for water samples. The presence of MPs is governed by the water system circulation, not associated with the proximity of land use and/or the population density. Three studies of MPs occurrence in sediment samples from the tropical Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Guinea, Nigeria (Fred-Ahmadu et al. 2020), in the Atlantic Ocean seashore, South Africa; Atlantic Ocean bays across Germany, and South Africa were first reported (Vilakati et al. 2020). The first studies on the distribution and characterization of MPs pollution in sediment samples were reported in the Atlantic Ocean, Nigeria (Gulf of Guinea) (Fred-Ahmadu et al. 2020), and a range of MPs abundance was recorded as 3.4 ± 3.5–173 ± 21.3 MPs /kg for the different beaches. Significantly varied MPs abundance in different beaches may be due to the different tidal waterlines (high and drift) systems. The MPs abundance in the Atlantic Ocean seashore was not quantified, which needs quantitative and occurrences studies(Vilakati et al. 2020). However, the abundance was quantified as a mean average of 1.15 ± 1.45 particles m− 3 in the Atlantic Ocean bays around South Africa in the subsurface water samples (Kanhai et al. 2017). The other studies on the MPs occurrence were carried out from the coastline, gulfs, bays, and estuaries with detailed physicochemical characterizations, the study location, and abundance are illustrated in Tables 1 and 4. In general, the present author (s) concludes that the MPs pollution research with water and sediment samples from the urban areas are highly polluted as compared with the locations face by city centers. However, their abundance/concentration recorded was the highest in the sediment samples as going far from the city at which land-based plastic pollution is low.
4.4 The occurrence of microplastics in wastewater
Wastewater treatment plants, especially municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), are channels through which secondary microplastics (MPs) are released into aquatic environments. From African countries’ WWTPs, there are no studies found, as of June 2020, on the identification and detections of MPs both in sewage and industrial effluents. However, worldwide reports, even if the studies are limited, confirm that the huge secondary MPs have been released from the WWTPs to the natural water bodies. Some of the examples are: reports from Canadian municipal WWTP confirmed the annual MP items have been entering into WWTP records that 1.76 ± 0.31 trillion. Of these, 1.28 ± 0.54 trillion are from primary sludge, 0.36 ± 0.22 trillion from activated sludge, and 0.03 ± 0.01 trillion are discharged into the water environment (Gies et al. 2018). Other reports from 12 WWTPs in Germany a total of 9*107 to 4*109 MP particles discharged annually efflux tested WWTP, and the authors recommend tertiary wastewater treatment unit processes as a post-filtration that can reduce total MP discharge by 97% (Mintenig et al. 2017). Microplastics concentrations in sewage sludge in Sweden, USA, Scotland, Netherlands Finland, China, Ireland, and Germany were detected as 720 ± 112 (Magnusson and Norén 2014), 4000–5000 (Carr et al. 2016), 1200–7868 (Murphy et al. 2016), 660–760 (Leslie et al. 2017), 23,000–170,900 (DW) (Lares et al. 2018), 1565–56,386 (DW) (Li et al. 2018), 4196–15,385 (DW) (Mahon et al. 2017), and 1000–24,000 (DW) (Mintenig et al. 2017), respectively. Because wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are an important pathway of MPs entering into natural aquatic systems, the present author recommends that effective detection of MPs and understanding of the abundance and fate from African countries WWTPs should be researched out.
4.5 The occurrence of microplastics in fauna from all studied African’s water systems
Reports in Lake Eleyele, Osun River, Lake Victoria, Jukskei River, Bloukrans River, the Eastern Harbor of Mediterranean Coast, Eastern seashore Ghana, Durban Harbor estuaries, Bloukrans River of Grahamstown, and Osun River were investigated MPs occurrence in different gastropods, insects, larvae, immobile warm species in the tube structure, and fish species samples. The MPs abundance, physical and chemical properties detected from water systems of biota samples. The different larvae species samples, with varied feeding habits, have a similar abundance even though the samples were collected from different African countries and water systems. This suggests that almost all biotas can ingest MP particles in their habitat systems. MPs pollution in African countries’ water bodies, dominantly with different South African provinces were studied in several gulfs, bays, lakes, and estuaries, and their abundance is varied. The aquatic biotas are recommended as they are an indicator of MPs pollution level of the water bodies due to their correlation with the water and sediment MPs pollution level as well. This was confirmed by Dahms et al., in which MPs from the three different samples (water, sediment, and larvae species) at the same sampling area were detected and have their correlation (Dahms et al. 2020). The MPs in Lake Eleyele were detected from a total of 109 fish samples consisting of eight species and were averagely found as a total of 69.7%. The different abundance is due to the maturity, different organs, and ingestion capacity of the species (Adeogun et al. 2020). The highest proportion was observed in the stomach. The abundance of MPs from Lake Victoria was studied by taking two different fish species (Nile perch and Nile tilapia), and was detected from the gastrointestinal tracts and observed 55% from 11 perch and 35% from 7 tilapia. The different abundance in those species is due to their feeding preference of the specific properties (Biginagwa et al. 2016). In the Ogun and Osun rivers, the MP abundance in different insect samples was observed as 43.29 ± 43.29; 62.36 ± 3.53; 291.76 ± 26.55 particles/species for the three different species (Akindele et al. 2020). MP observed with varied order of insects is due to different feeding tells than aquatic faunas of different taxonomic and /or ecological niches could be likely on MP pollutants. The abundance of MP in the Chironomus sp. is significantly higher as compared with the other two. This is due to the high ability to gather and depositing organic materials (Nel et al. 2018). MP pollution in River Jukskei from larvae species samples at the urban streams have been studied and recorded different values in different sampling sites. The mean values of MPs are recorded as 53.4 particles g−1 in larvae species samples (Dahms et al. 2020). The MP abundance in Bloukrans River, South Africa, from larvae samples was potentially studied as compared with the other rivers in the country. The mean abundances were recorded as 0.37 ± 0.44 and 1.12 ± 1.19 particles mg−1 wet weight for the summer and winter, respectively, in the larvae species (Nel et al. 2018). In this study, the abundance of larvae species was observed 75% in the summer season, but the occurrence increased to 98% in the winter season. From this, it can be concluded that the larvae species studied are significantly seasonal dependents. Other reports confirmed that the important MPs identification studies in fish samples were carried out in Eastern Harbor from the Mediterranean Coast of Egypt (Shabaka et al. 2020). A range of abundance with the three different species was recorded as 7527, 3593, and 1450 MPs fish−1. The varied MPs abundance is observed based on the fish species plastic ingestion ability, and the accumulation capacity which corresponds with the weight and length of the species used. Thus, it can be deduced that the African countries’ water system is polluted by MPs, which has been affecting the aquatic animals. However, the present author has not found any report of MPs’ occurrence and impacts on the aquatic plants from the African countries’ water system.
4.6 Worldwide microplastics in the water system
MPs are passed and get into the world’s water system through coastline, beaches, bay, and gulfs in runoff sediments from the littering. The abundance of MPs from some countries worldwide, other than Africa, retrieved literature is reviewed and illustrated in Table 3. The sample type and quantified concentration MPs in different locations of freshwater and marine environment were compared. Some of the retrieved literature selected and used for comparison of MPs abundance is based on, intentionally, the different geographical areas, not more than one or two articles in a country, and studied locations to be the review inclusion across a country. Different reports confirmed that studies were carried out by using various sampling techniques separation procedures, and instrumental methods, and the quantity and quality of the detected MPs are also varied. The MPs abundance and/or concentration can be expressed in different units of measurement depending on the techniques used. Established standard techniques for effective (Filella 2015), and reliable determination (Hidalgo-Ruz et al. 2012) of MPs have been recommended by many researchers including the present author (s). Thus, direct comparisons of the microplastic abundance are not reliable due to the methods used in the studies could be varied (Qiu et al. 2016). However, the reports possibly provide an overview of insights into MPs abundance with their pollution levels. As can be seen, MPs quantified are much higher in some countries than others. Comparatively, the abundance in ocean water is higher than the freshwater systems, such as 466,000 particles km− 2 MP particles concentrations were detected from the Laurentian Great Lake water system (Eriksen et al. 2013). Thus, it can be concluded that the MPs concentration from freshwater may indicate the current pollution level, but the cumulative pollutions could be reflected from the marine environment. Studies from the Easter Island Chile, Danish waters from Denmark and Jurujuba Cove and Niterói, RJFive urban from Brazil reported that the small abundance/concentration of MPs was recorded as 0.072 g/L, 0.0324 g/L, and 0.099 g/L, respectively, as compared with other countries.
5 Physical and structural characteristics of microplastics in the African water system
MP particles have no unique characteristics, rather they are found in different physical, chemical, and structural properties. Depending on the virgin plastic sources, MPs have been found with different densities, shapes, colors, lengths, and polymer types. This may arise also from their additives contained contaminants within the plastic polymer. The MP particle characteristics have a direct correlation with their toxicity (Frère et al. 2017). For example, among different types of MP shapes, fibers are confirmed that the most toxic for biotas in the water system (Ziajahromi et al. 2017). The light weightiness, length, and polymeric shape highly affect the floating/ sediment down nature of particles (Kaiser et al. 2017). In this review, the basic characteristics of identified MPs in African countries’ water systems, from the retrieved kinds of literature, are adequately analyzed in the studies. Some of the studies were not carried out the necessary properties of MP particles. The essential properties (shape, color, polymer type, and size), and study locations of identified MPs in African countries’ water systems are illustrated as shown in Table 4.
From the 25 retrieved publications, out of 33 works of literature, the size of MPs was determined, and the other 8 studies were not determined the length of the MP particle as shown in Table 4. The different size distribution was observed, and different techniques were adopted by different scholars. Averagely, the largest MP length abundance was found in the seashore of Ghana (Adika et al. 2020). The next large-sized MP abundance was identified from the southeastern coastline of South Africa (Nel and Froneman 2015). The small-sized ranged from 0.011 to 0.5315 mm MP abundance was found in the river water bodies; Obiaraedu, Nwangele, Okumpi, Ogbajarajara, and Onuezuze Rivers (Ebere et al. 2019), Bloukrans River in the eastern periphery of the Mediterranean Sea (Nel et al. 2018), Bloukrans River (Nel et al. 2019). The size of MP abundance from the three studied lakes, Oxbow Lake (Biginagwa et al. 2016), Eleyele Lake (Adeogun et al. 2020), and Victoria Lake (Oni et al. 2020) have been recorded as 2.41, 0.827, and < 0.5 mm, respectively. More or less, the estuaries, coastlines, bays, and gulfs of the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean have been observed that a similar length of MP abundance ranged from 0.63 to 2.6 mm. The MP sizes recorded are dependent on the sampling techniques, pretreatment methods, and identification techniques used. Also, the water systems (freshwater and marine water), the sample type (sediment, water, and biotas), and the sampling site (polluted and less polluted areas) have fundamental effects. Mostly, MP with low density could float on the top surface of the water, and would not able to detect in the sediment samples. The high-density MP is vice versa to this. Thus, harmonized standard methods for the detection of MPs are required to report viable size distribution.
Identifying the shapes of polymeric characteristics is very important for the subsequent policy establishments on plastic waste management. Because the shape of the MPs detected has a direct indication of the virgin macroplastics. In this review, the identified shapes of MPs were found from 28 articles as shown in Table 4. Some of the scholars have also quantified the shapes in percentages. Generally, the shape characteristics of the MP were classified as fragments, filaments, fibers, film, pellets, sheets, beads, flake, angular, round, and foam. Dominantly, the fibers and fragment shapes of MP abundance were observed for all types of samples. The fiber MPs are considered as pollution could contribute from the fabric (textiles) pathways, and films are from single-use plastic bags and packaging plastic materials (Kanhai et al. 2017). However other infrequent shapes, such as pellets, irregular shapes, spheres are originated from different commercial goods and transportations, especially occurred in the municipality (Fred-Ahmadu et al. 2020). The high percentage of filaments, fragments, and fibers particularly were recorded within fish (Adeogun et al. 2020), larvae (Akindele et al. 2020), and insect (Dahms et al. 2020) samples. Spheres and sheet MP percentage abundant were observed in a small proportion as compared with other shapes. As a concluding remark, the MP particles detected in African countries’ water systems are mostly from secondary MP sources, as per the present author (s) knowledge and also the evidence from the highly recorded shapes found as fragments, films, and fibers.
The color of the MPs detected is another important characteristic of virgin plastics. In this review, the twenty reports were found that the detected MPs were recorded the color of particles, and most of them are quantified in percentage constituents also. MPs having transparent colors are basically from the packaging materials which are single-use products. However, the black, blue, red yellow, and other colors are originated from resistant packaging materials, and also from other plastic goods. As shown in Table 4, a high percentage of transparent detected MPs, approximately 80%, was observed from Jukskei River from sediment samples, but, 30% for water samples and 3.9% for larvae samples (Dahms et al. 2020). In this review, generally, the color (black, blue, and red) MPs, especially in the urban estuaries, gulfs and bays were found more abundantly. Many of the reports from the retrieved literature confirmed that different color MPs in different locations and sample types in the same water system were found.
In addition to the physical characteristics of MPs, the chemical composition (polymer type) is crucial to ascertain a certain conclusion to the virgin plastic wastes. In this review, twenty-one studies were found in African countries’ water systems that contain the polymer type information. Dominantly, Polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS), and polyethylene (PE) types of MPs were found. This validates that those dominant polymeric plastic types are the most widely used products for commercial good in African countries which accounts for the high abundance of MPs. The reason why also PS was found dominantly is due to the consumer product protecting plastics (for example foam packaging peanuts for shipping, food packaging, meat/poultry trays, and egg cartons) is widely used in the studied area. This is because those materials are advantageous as compared with other plastic polymers for protection against damage or spoilage of foods (Naidoo and Glassom 2019).
6 Effects and potential risks of microplastics in water systems
Many studies on the impacts of plastic wastes as macroplastics and their fragments called MPs on different water systems have been investigated. Particularly, in addition to human, the environmental deterioration (Auta et al. 2017), the impacts on aquatic organisms (Chae and An 2017) have been reviewed. Among the different effects of MPs on the aquatic organisms, scrapes, and abscesses, clogs of the digestive tract have been mostly reported. These effects have a direct impact on the organisms in such a way that the high mortality rates, decreased fertility, the provocative response on their biological systems, changes of metabolism mechanisms, modifications on their nourishing system, and reproductive disturbance. Besides, the organisms could be impacted by the release of toxic monomers and/or additives during the degradation of plastic polymers. MPs could be the vectors for other associated contaminants by adsorbing them on them and could have more effects on the organisms. Because MPs can adsorb heavy metals, and complex chemicals would be formed in the water system (Aragaw and Mekonnen 2021a). Li et al. also reported that MPs extracted from sewage sludge could be used as potential adsorbents for Cd, Pb, and Co removal which is an indication of they can act as a vector in the natural environment (Li et al. 2019). The effects of these MPs have been influenced by the physical (particle size, shape, and color) of the structure of the particles, and the chemical structure (polymer types), such as PE, PP, and PS. Even though the degree of their impact is varied, all reports have been shown that they have negative effects for both the aquatic organisms and in the environment itself. Some researchers and industrialists have been used microbeads (primary MPs sources) for ecotoxicity studies as a model, and they cannot put any sayings on the effects of morphological features of sampled MPs in the open environment. In this regard, many scholars have worried and expressed their fillings about current practices of ecotoxicological studies of MPs (Connors et al. 2017). Thus, they have pointed out the need for refining the reliability (Lambert et al. 2017), and the significance of extensive research on MPs (Lenz et al. 2016).
In addition to the impacts on aquatic organisms, the environmental effects of plastic waste and, their fragmented MPs have been reported in a good manner (Rochman 2016). Waste plastic bags, cans, and bottles have been disposed of on the littering and interring into the water bodies together with the sediments making anoxic conditions within it which could reduce the productivity, and lowering of the abundances of invertebrates (Green et al. 2015). This could make the disappearance of biodiversity within a long period, and the final will disturb the total ecosystem balance. Even some of the polymers (e.g., polyester) have an impact on different bacterial biochemical constituents in the aquatic ecosystem (Kesy et al. 2016). Also, the MP exposure to the water system could have an impact on the natural filtration of mechanism, and decrease the nutrient concentrations (e.g., ammonium, phosphate, calcium, magnesium, etc.) results in a decrease in biomass growth, such as cyanobacteria and green algae (Green et al. 2017). Thus, the totality of ecological degradation and deterioration by MPs is being the future direction to be investigated to be an input in the mitigation efforts for the organization, and policymakers (Rochman 2016). The effect of MPs studies is not associated directly to perform the environmental risk assessments so far. This is due to the inconsistent results obtained on the field-collected MPs sample, and the MP samples used in the ecotoxicological investigation. The risks of MPs based on the abundance, they are relatively low investigations have been carried out in the aquatic systems. Because MPs can act as niches for organisms (Aragaw and Mekonnen 2021a), the physicochemical, and morphological features of their complex niches should be critically studied in the future to investigate the ecotoxicological impacts as compared with the simple MPs only (Yu et al. 2020). Other than the MPs, nanofibers, and fabrics as a nano-plastic material has not been researched out and monitored. This may be a tie to inappropriate and/or standardized sampling techniques and analysis methods (Henry et al. 2019). The nanofiber is more toxic than the macroplastics most of which are produced by the electrospinning fabrication processes. The toxicity that is produced is due to the charging and melting in the fabrication processes. One of the recent concerns on nano-plastic fabrics is surgical face masks which have been fabricated in a huge amount to control COVID-19 pandemics. Some researches confirmed that the presence of nano-plastics in the nanofiber in personal care products (Schwaferts et al. 2019). Thus, researches on the nano-plastics including surgical face masks by developing effective sampling, and analytical methods are essential to identify and quantify within the different environments (aquatic, sediment, soil, etc.) including their fate and impacts on the fauna and flora in the future.
7 Plastic management and regulation in Africa and other countries
MPs are originated from plastic polymers solid wastes, also sometimes from wastewater. Intentionally also from microfibers and microbeads being a source of primary MP particles. Thus, managing the plastic wastes following solid waste regulation is indirectly managing the MPs in particular. There are many sustainable options for plastic wastes management, such as recycling, recovery, and reusing. Depending on the polymeric type, the plastic wastes can be converted into fuels via pyrolysis, and other technologies including the surges of medical waste. Aragaw and Mekonnen (2021a, b) reported that fuels can be produced from polypropylene and polyvinyl chlorides plastic polymers, such as single-use face masks and surgical gloves that are an important source of MPs recently (Aragaw and Mekonnen 2021b). Generally, the management practices of solid wastes are implemented under Environmental Programs worldwide. Particularly in Africa, the solid wastes are managed under Environmental Protection Organs as a general, the Authority which constitutes the Council, the Sectorial and Regional environmental units and agencies mentioned under different Articles and Proclamations, with a defined proclamation number. The proclamation number and establishment years are different for the different countries in Africa, such as the proclamation in the federal democratic republic of Ethiopia was provided for the establishment of environmental protection organs since 2009 with a proclamation number of 295/2002. Recently, most of all African countries have updated the environmental protection organs into two separate organizations as “Environmental development and management,” and “environmental protection, regulations, and monitoring.” This was intentionally proposed for the sustainable use of the environmental resource, and effective management, thereby avoiding possible conflicts of interests and duplication of efforts. Also, it was necessary to establish a system that fosters coordinated but differentiated responsibilities among environmental protection agencies at federal and regional levels. Some of the countries have been managing the solid waste under the urban administration authorities in the regional cities, and some are under environmental protection agencies, specifically, Solid Waste Management Proclamation (SWMP) is established. Most of the African countries have established this proclamation recently. For example, the federal democratic republic of Ethiopia has established since 2014. In this proclamation, solid waste is well categorized as glass containers and tin cans; plastic bags; used tries; food waste; hazardous waste; construction debris. The general obligation, management planning, transportation systems, disposal cite constructions, audition, civil liability, penalty, and effective date on the solid waste are properly stated in this law including a detailed description of each section, but the implementation is limited still. In addition to the solid waste proclamation laws, other legislation under the water, and energy minister, and Lakes protection and development agency (for example established in 2020 in Ethiopia) have a contribution to the prevention of marine environment pollution.
Some African countries, especially Western African countries are increasingly adopting single-use plastic pollution reduction policies even though the policies have been limited implementation and analysis. The policy instruments used are the legislative of single-use plastic bag bans. Eleven countries have instituted bans, 1 country has a market-based instrument and the other 4 countries have no strategy out of 16 Western African countries (Adam et al. 2020). Those countries that have bans legislative carry good punishment proclamations, such as penalties and prison sentences. But, the legislation has a limited consultation during the ban drafting stage which lacks important provisions, such as reusable alternatives, the national campaigns are not yet established, and poor enforcement. Also, the ban announcement to the public is not notified as early as possible before the subsequent implementation. Thus, the present author (s) suggests that the policy revisions by including the stakeholders, consultants with enough time between announcement and implementation, and including cost-effective reusable alternatives should be made.
Besides the African countries’ laws and regulations, worldwide regulations have been established and implemented on the prevention, and management of plastic wastes. Example The People’s Republic of China has established different provisions on the solid waste management system including the plastic bag ban systems. The State Economic and Trade Commission (SETC) announced the immediate cessation of the production and use of disposable foam plastic tableware (SETC 2001). The General Office of the State Council (GOSC) limited the production, sale, and use of plastic shopping bags; banned ultrathin plastic bags (b 0.025 mm), and implemented charges for the use of other plastic bags in market places beginning on June 1, 2008 (GOSC 2007a). Also, the GOSC promulgated a new regulation on waste import (GOSC 2007b). In this regulation, importing the 24 different types of waste have been banned, including plastic waste derived from daily use. Other regulations on the Management Methods of Import of Solid Waste, and Electronic Waste. Another important and recent regulation named the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) under their project on the marine waste actions acts approved by the European Commission (Li et al. 2020a). The project is specifically established for awareness creation through the public education program toward plastic particle pollution in the marine environment.
As stated above, several proclamations, laws, and regulations on solid waste management systems, and specifically plastic waste are already established in African countries. But, the management practice on these rules is negligible so far, even not yet totally considered in some countries. Unlawful discarding of solid wastes and littering of the cities and rural areas and the water systems is uncontrolled in many African countries. The present author (s) have been observing a huge plastic waste in the marine environment of many African countries which ends up as MPs pollution and due to the unimplemented regulations. Because almost all African countries are listed under the low-income categories, the peoples have been forced to use low-cost and very thin plastic products in their small markets for different personal goods. Next to textile fabrics, plastic industries are emerging, and extensively used factories in Africa, which is not yet regulated due to the intense rest of the economy. Up to date, using all of the plastic products in person and/or at the organization level is allowed in African countries without regulation implementation. Thus, the governments of African countries need to be more hands-on in preventing plastic pollution problems to prevent environmental contamination as well as human health as responsible bodies.
8 Conclusions, recommendations, and future directives
MPs pollution has been a recent emerging threat in the aquatic ecosystems. Pollutions and their toxicity has been reported widely worldwide. Even if scholars conducted so far on the MPs pollution in African countries’ water systems are limited, the available literature indicates that MPs pollution is ubiquitous in the assessed water environments. Researched water bodies located in African countries are seriously polluted, with a huge MPs abundance. However, there is limited awareness and knowledge about MPs in the water systems such as detailed impacts on biotas subsequently to human health, environmental deterioration, and fast plastic management practice. This review synthesized the current practice and status of MPs pollution and future research directives in the aquatic environment in African countries’ water systems. The sampling methods, identification techniques, occurrences, and abundance of MPs were discussed. Also, the effect and risks of MPs in the water system, and plastic waste regulation were assessed. The basic sampling techniques during MPs identification: volume-reduced, and bulk sampling techniques were described together with their advantages and disadvantages to offer for scholars with the choice of suitability to use. Illustrations on the MP particles separation and purification techniques from different samples were stated. The retrieved literature confirmed that the analysis and identification with visualization methods (microscopy counting), spectroscopy techniques (FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron spectroscopy), and chromatographic techniques (pyrolysis-GC/MS, and liquid chromatography) were employed, and this review discussed the pros and cons of them. The previous reports on the identification and detection of MPs, almost all, were used spectroscopic techniques, especially the attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR), and micro-Fourier transform infrared (µ FTIR).
The poor management and inadequate enforcement of relevant laws and regulations have led to the current status of MP pollution in African countries’ water systems. In this review, the author (s) found that there are no adequate researches conducted on MPs pollution from African countries’ water systems, such as no research has been conducted on the big Lake, Lake Tana, and River, Nile River, (the world’s largest river); even only one report was conducted and found so far on the worlds’ 3rd largest Lake, Lake Victoria. Thus, extensive researches on the quantification and detection of MPs from the African aquatic system is required together with the macroplastic waste management practice. Also, it has been seen that quantification and identification of MPs using a single analytical technique and sampling methods, which could not give the entire quantity and quality of the particles; hence, a combination of techniques is recommended. The combinations of different techniques can improve peoples’ understanding of MPs pollution, and standardized sampling methods are required for more reliable data worldwide.
In African countries aquatic environment, the following issues of priority should be addressed:
-
Standardized and optimized sampling and analytical methods for the reliability of MPs pollution.
-
Investigation on the transport, and environmental conditions for the degradation mechanisms of macroplastics, and impacts of MPs in aquatic biota and fauna is required.
-
Development and pathway models for the assessment of MP accumulation in dynamic water systems and input lines to the oceans should be researched.
-
Evaluation of the impacts of MPs on the socio-economy and environment is needed.
-
Investigating the effect of MPs on the organisms from the molecular to community levels, and the associated contaminant influence on the ecosystem and their toxic effects should be conducted.
-
Development of rules and regulations, based on the life cycle assessment (LCA), for the production of biodegradable plastic products as substituents of fuel-based plastics, is required.
Monitoring, research project, management, and policy-formulation are required that will help the researchers for a better understanding of the risks of MPs pollution in water systems and used as a guide for the development of plastic waste management systems and plans. African countries’ governments should formulate plastic waste management practices, strengthen the enforcement of relevant laws and regulations, establishing policies, and increase publicity and education to improve people’s awareness and knowledge of MPs pollution effects on the environment and the organisms as well.
References
Abidli S, Antunes JC, Ferreira JL et al (2018) Microplastics in sediments from the littoral zone of the north Tunisian coast (Mediterranean Sea). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 205:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.03.006
Adam I, Walker TR, Carlos J, Clayton A (2020) Policies to reduce single-use plastic marine pollution in West Africa. Mar Policy 116:103928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103928
Adeogun AO, Ibor OR, Khan EA et al (2020) Detection and occurrence of microplastics in the stomach of commercial fish species from a municipal water supply lake in southwestern Nigeria. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:31035–31045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09031-5
Adika SA, Mahu E, Crane R et al (2020) Microplastic ingestion by pelagic and demersal fish species from the Eastern Central Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Ghana. Mar Pollut Bull 153:110998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110998
Akindele EO, Ehlers SM, Koop JHE (2019) Limnologica First empirical study of freshwater microplastics in West Africa using gastropods from Nigeria as bioindicators. Limnologica 78:125708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2019.125708
Akindele EO, Ehlers SM, Koop JHE (2020) Freshwater insects of different feeding guilds ingest microplastics in two Gulf of Guinea tributaries in Nigeria. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:33373–33379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08763-8
Anderson PJ, Warrack S, Langen V et al (2017) Microplastic contamination in Lake Winnipeg, Canada. Environ Pollut 225:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.072
Aragaw TA (2020) Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario. Mar Pollut Bull 159:111517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111517
Aragaw TA, Mekonnen BA (2021a) Distribution and impact of microplastics in the aquatic systems: a review of ecotoxicological effects on biota. In: Muthu SS (ed) Microplastic pollution. Sustainable textiles: production, processing, manufacturing & chemistry. Springer Singapore, pp 65–104
Aragaw TA, Mekonnen BA (2021b) Current plastics pollution threats due to COVID-19 and its possible mitigation techniques: a waste-to-energy conversion via Pyrolysis. Environ Syst Res 10:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-020-00217-x
Arthur C, Baker J, Bamford H (2009) Proceedings of the international research workshop on the occurrence, effects, and fate of microplastic marine debris. In: Occurrence of small plastic debris in the marine environment: fate of plastics debris in the marine environment. p 530
Auta HS, Emenike CU, Fauziah SH (2017) Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions. Environ Int 102:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013
Bergmann M, Sandhop N, Schewe I, D’Hert D (2016) Observations of floating anthropogenic litter in the Barents Sea and Fram Strait, Arctic. Polar Biol 39:553–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1795-8
Biginagwa FJ, Mayoma BS, Shashoua Y et al (2016) First evidence of microplastics in the African Great Lakes: recovery from Lake Victoria Nile perch and Nile tilapia. J Great Lakes Res 42:146–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2015.10.012
Blair RM, Waldron S, Phoenix VR, Gauchotte-Lindsay C (2019) Microscopy and elemental analysis characterization of microplastics in the sediment of a freshwater urban river in Scotland, UK. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:12491–12504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04678-1
Bordós G, Urbányi B, Micsinai A et al (2019) Identification of microplastics in fish ponds and natural freshwater environments of the Carpathian basin. Europe Chemosphere 216:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.110
Browne MA (2015) Marine anthropogenic litter. In: Marine Anthropogenic Litter, pp 229–244
Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ et al (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 45:9175–9179. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s
Carr SA, Liu J, Tesoro AG (2016) Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 91:174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.002
Castro RO, Silva ML, Marques MRC, de Araújo FV (2016) Evaluation of microplastics in Jurujuba Cove, Niterói, RJ, Brazil, an area of mussels farming. Mar Pollut Bull 110:555–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.037
Chae Y, An YJ (2017) Effects of micro-and nanoplastics on aquatic ecosystems: current research trends and perspectives. Mar Pollut Bull 124:624–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.070
Claessens M, Meester S, De LL Van et al (2011) Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in marine sediments along the Belgian coast. Mar Pollut Bull 62:2199–2204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.06.030
Claessens M, Van Cauwenberghe L, Vandegehuchte MB, Janssen CR (2013) New techniques for the detection of microplastics in sediments and field collected organisms. Mar Pollut Bull 70:227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.03.009
Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, Galloway TS (2011) Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 62:2588–2597
Cole M, Webb H, Lindeque PK et al (2014) Isolation of microplastics in biota-rich seawater samples and marine organisms. Sci Rep 4:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04528
Connors KA, Dyer SD, Belanger SE (2017) Advancing the quality of environmental microplastic research. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:1697–1703. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3829
Corcoran PL (2015) Benthic plastic debris in marine and freshwater environments. Environ Sci Process Impacts 17:1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5em00188a
Dahms HTJ, van Rensburg GJ, Greenfield R (2020) The microplastic profile of an urban African stream. Sci Total Environ 731:138893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138893
De-la-Torre GE (2020) Microplastics: an emerging threat to food security and human health. J Food Sci Technol 57:1601–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04138-1
De-la-Torre GE, Aragaw TA (2021) What we need to know about PPE associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 163:111879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111879
Dehaut A, Cassone AL, Frère L et al (2016) Microplastics in seafood: benchmark protocol for their extraction and characterization. Environ Pollut 215:223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.018
Ding L, Mao R, Guo X et al (2019) Microplastics in surface waters and sediments of the Wei River, in the northwest of China. Sci Total Environ 667:427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.332
Dioses-Salinas DC, Pizarro-Ortega CI, De-la-Torre GE (2020) A methodological approach of the current literature on microplastic contamination in terrestrial environments: current knowledge and baseline considerations. Sci Total Environ 730:139164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139164
Dris R, Gasperi J, Rocher V et al (2015) Microplastic contamination in an urban area: a case study in Greater Paris. Environ Chem 12:592–599. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN14167
Dubaish F, Liebezeit G (2013) Suspended microplastics and black carbon particles in the Jade system, southern North Sea. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1352-9
Ebere EC, Wirnkor VA, Ngozi VE, Chukwuemeka IS (2019) Macrodebris and microplastics pollution in Nigeria: first report on abundance, distribution and composition. Environ Health Toxicol 34:1–15. https://doi.org/10.5620/eaht.e2019012
Elert AM, Becker R, Duemichen E et al (2017) Comparison of different methods for MP detection: what can we learn from them, and why asking the right question before measurements matters? Environ Pollut 231:1256–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.074
Enders K, Lenz R, Stedmon CA, Nielsen TG (2015) Abundance, size and polymer composition of marine microplastics ≥ 10 µm in the Atlantic Ocean and their modeled vertical distribution. Mar Pollut Bull 100:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.027
Eriksen M, Mason S, Wilson S et al (2013) Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Mar Pollut Bull 77:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.007
Farrell P, Nelson K (2013) Trophic level transfer of microplastic: Mytilus edulis (L.) to Carcinus maenas (L.). Environ Pollut 177:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.046
Faure F, Corbaz M, Baecher H, De Alencastro LF (2012) Pollution due to plastics and microplastics in Lake Geneva and in the Mediterranean sea. Arch Des Sci 65:157–164. https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-738358
Filella M (2015) Questions of size and numbers in environmental research on microplastics: methodological and conceptual aspects. Environ Chem 12:527–538. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN15012
Fischer EK, Paglialonga L, Czech E, Tamminga M (2016) Microplastic pollution in lakes and lake shoreline sediments—a case study on Lake Bolsena and Lake Chiusi (central Italy). Environ Pollut 213:648–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.012
Fred-Ahmadu OH, Ayejuyo OO, Benson NU (2020) Microplastics distribution and characterization in epipsammic sediments of tropical Atlantic Ocean, Nigeria. Reg Stud Mar Sci 38:101365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101365
Free CM, Jensen OP, Mason SA et al (2014) High-levels of microplastic pollution in a large, remote, mountain lake. Mar Pollut Bull 85:156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.001
Frère L, Paul-Pont I, Rinnert E et al (2017) Influence of environmental and anthropogenic factors on the composition, concentration, and spatial distribution of microplastics: a case study of the Bay of Brest (Brittany, France). Environ Pollut 225:211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.023
Galgani F, Hanke G, Werner SDVL, De Vrees L (2013) Marine litter within the European marine strategy framework directive. ICES J Mar Sci 70:115–126
Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Production, use, and the fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv 3:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
Gies EA, LeNoble JL, Noël M et al (2018) Retention of microplastics in a major secondary wastewater treatment plant in Vancouver, Canada. Mar Pollut Bull 133:553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.006
GOSC (2007a) Notice of the General Office of State Council on Restricting the Production, Sale, and Use of Plastic Shopping Bags. In: Gen. Off. State Counc. www.shanghai.gov.cn
GOSC (2007b) Notice of the general office of the state council on issuing the implementation plan for prohibiting the entry of foreign garbage and advancing the reform of the solid waste import administration system. In: Gen. Off. State Counc. www.shanghai.gov.cn
Green DS, Boots B, Blockley DJ et al (2015) Impacts of discarded plastic bags on marine assemblages and ecosystem functioning. Environ Sci Technol 49:5380–5389. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00277
Green DS, Boots B, O’Connor NE, Thompson R (2017) Microplastics affect the ecological functioning of an important biogenic habitat. Environ Sci Technol 51:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04496
Henry B, Laitala K, Klepp IG (2019) Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment. Sci Total Environ 652:483–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166
Heo NW, Hong SH, Han GM et al (2013) Distribution of small plastic debris in cross-section and high strandline on Heungnam beach, South Korea. Ocean Sci J 48:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-013-0019-9
Hermabessiere L, Dehaut A, Paul-Pont I et al (2017) Occurrence and effects of plastic additives on marine environments and organisms: a review. Chemosphere 182:781–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.096
Hidalgo-Ruz V, Lars G, Thompson R, Martin T (2012) Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ Sci Technol 46:3060–3075. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2031505
Hidalgo-Ruz V, Thiel M (2013) Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): A study supported by a citizen science project. Mar Environ Res 87:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.02.015
Hintersteiner I, Himmelsbach M, Buchberger WW (2015) Characterization and quantitation of polyolefin microplastics in personal-care products using high-temperature gel-permeation chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:1253–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8318-2
Huppertsberg S, Knepper TP (2018) Instrumental analysis of microplastics—benefits and challenges. Anal Bioanal Chem 410:6343–6352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1210-8
Ilechukwu I, Ndukwe GI, Mgbemena NM, Akandu AU (2019) Occurrence of microplastics in surface sediments of beaches in Lagos, Nigeria. Eur Chem Bull 8:371–375. https://doi.org/10.17628/ecb.2019.8.371-375
Imhof HK, Laforsch C, Wiesheu AC et al (2016) Pigments and plastic in limnetic ecosystems: a qualitative and quantitative study on microparticles of different size classes. Water Res 98:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.015
Imhof HK, Schmid J, Niessner R et al (2012) A novel, highly efficient method for the separation and quantification of plastic particles in sediments of aquatic environments. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 10:524–537. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.524
Ivleva NP, Wiesheu AC, Niessner R (2017) Microplastic in aquatic ecosystems. Angew Chemie Int Ed 56:1720–1739. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201606957
Jambeck JR, Ji Q, Zhang Y-G et al (2015) Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347:764–768. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260879
Kaiser D, Kowalski N, Waniek JJ (2017) Effects of biofouling on the sinking behavior of microplastics. Environ Res Lett 12:124003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8e8b
Kanhai LDK, Officer R, Lyashevska O et al (2017) Microplastic abundance, distribution and composition along a latitudinal gradient in the Atlantic Ocean. Mar Pollut Bull 115:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.12.025
Karami A, Golieskardi A, Keong Choo C et al (2017) The presence of microplastics in commercial salts from different countries. Sci Rep 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46173
Kesy K, Oberbeckmann S, Müller F, Labrenz M (2016) Polystyrene influences bacterial assemblages in Arenicola marina-populated aquatic environments in vitro. Environ Pollut 219:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.032
Lambert S, Scherer C, Wagner M (2017) Ecotoxicity testing of microplastics: considering the heterogeneity of physicochemical properties. Integr Environ Assess Manag 13:470–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1901
Lares M, Ncibi MC, Sillanpää M, Sillanpää M (2018) Occurrence, identification and removal of microplastic particles and fibers in conventional activated sludge process and advanced MBR technology. Water Res 133:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.049
Lebreton LCM, Van Der Zwet J, Damsteeg JW et al (2017) River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat Commun 8:15611. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611
Lenz R, Enders K, Nielsen TG (2016) Microplastic exposure studies should be environmentally realistic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E4121–E4122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606615113
Leslie HA, Brandsma SH, van Velzen MJM, Vethaak AD (2017) Microplastics en route: field measurements in the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater treatment plants, North Sea sediments, and biota. Environ Int 101:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.018
Li X, Chen L, Mei Q et al Microplastics in sewage sludge from the wastewater treatment plants in China. Water Res 142:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.034
Li X, Mei Q, Chen L et al (2019) Enhancement in adsorption potential of microplastics in sewage sludge for metal pollutants after the wastewater treatment process. Water Res 157:228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.069
Li C, Busquets R, Campos LC (2020a) Assessment of microplastics in freshwater systems: a review. Sci Total Environ 707:135578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135578
Li Y, Lu Z, Zheng H et al (2020b) Microplastics in surface water and sediments of Chongming Island in the Yangtze Estuary, China. Environ Sci Eur 32:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0297-7
Löder MGJ, Kuczera M, Mintenig S et al (2015) Focal plane array detector-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging for the analysis of microplastics in environmental samples. Environ Chem 12:563–581. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN14205
Magnusson K, Norén F (2014) Screening of microplastic particles in and down-stream a wastewater treatment plant. Stockholm
Mahon AM, Connell BO, Healy MG et al (2017) Microplastics in sewage sludge: effects of treatment. Environ Sci Technol 51:810–818. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04048
Matsuguma Y, Takada H, Kumata H, Kanke H (2017) Microplastics in sediment cores from Asia and Africa as indicators of temporal trends in plastic pollution. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 73:230–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-017-0414-9
Merga LB, Redondo-Hasselerharm PE, Van den Brink PJ, Koelmans AA (2020) Distribution of microplastic and small macroplastic particles across four fish species and sediment in an African lake. Sci Total Environ 741:140527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140527
Mintenig SM, Int-Veen I, Löder MGJ et al (2017) Identification of microplastic in effluents of wastewater treatment plants using focal plane array-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging. Water Res 108:365–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.015
Murphy F, Ewins C, Carbonnier F, Quinn B (2016) Wastewater treatment works (WwTW) as a source of microplastics in the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Technol 50:5800–5808. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05416
Naidoo T, Glassom D (2019) Sea-surface microplastic concentrations along the coastal shelf of KwaZulu–Natal, South Africa. Mar Pollut Bull 149:110514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110514
Naidoo T, Glassom D, Smit AJ (2015) Plastic pollution in five urban estuaries of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Mar Pollut Bull 101:473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.044
Naidoo T, Smit AJ, Glassom D (2016) Plastic ingestion by estuarine mullet Mugil cephalus (Mugilidae) in an urban harbor, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. African J Mar Sci 38:145–149. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2016.1159616
Naidoo T, Sershen, Thompson RC, Rajkaran A (2020) Quantification and characterization of microplastics ingested by selected juvenile fish species associated with mangroves in KwaZulu-. Environ Pollut 257:113635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113635
Nel HA, Froneman PW (2015) A quantitative analysis of microplastic pollution along the south-eastern coastline of South Africa. MPB 101:274–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.043
Nel HA, Froneman PW (2018) Presence of microplastics in the tube structure of the reef-building polychaete Gunnarea gaimardi (Quatrefages 1848). African J Mar Sci 40:87–89. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2018.1443835
Nel HA, Hean JW, Noundou XS et al (2017) Do microplastic loads reflect the population demographics along the southern African coastline? Mar Pollut Bull 115:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.11.056
Nel HA, Dalu T, Wasserman RJ (2018) Sinks, and sources: assessing microplastic abundance in river sediment and deposit feeders in an Austral temperate urban river system. Sci Total Environ 612:950–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.298
Nel HA, Dalu T, Wasserman RJ, Hean JW (2019) Colour and size influence plastic microbead underestimation, regardless of sediment grain size. Sci Total Environ 655:567–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.261
Nuelle MT, Dekiff JH, Remy D, Fries E (2014) A new analytical approach for monitoring microplastics in marine sediments. Environ Pollut 184:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.027
Oni BA, Ayeni AO, Agboola O et al (2020) Comparing microplastics contaminants in (dry and raining) seasons for Ox-Bow Lake in Yenagoa, Nigeria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 198:110656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110656
PlasticEurope (2020) Plastics – the Facts 2020
Praveena SM, Shaifuddin SNM, Akizuki S (2018) Exploration of microplastics from personal care and cosmetic products and its estimated emissions to the marine environment: an evidence from Malaysia. Mar Pollut Bull 136:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.012
Qiu Q, Tan Z, Wang J et al (2016) Extraction, enumeration, and identification methods for monitoring microplastics in the environment. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 176:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.04.012
Rocha-Santos T, Duarte AC (2015) A critical overview of the analytical approaches to the occurrence, the fate, and the behavior of microplastics in the environment. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 65:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2014.10.011
Rochman CM (2016) Ecologically relevant data are policy-relevant data: microplastics reduce fish hatching success and survival. Science 352:1172–1172. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8697
Rochman CM, Kross SM, Armstrong JB et al (2015) Scientific Evidence Supports a Ban on Microbeads. Environ Sci Technol 49:10759–10761. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03909
Schwaferts C, Niessner R, Elsner M, Ivleva NP (2019) Methods for the analysis of submicrometer- and nano plastic particles in the environment. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 112:52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.12.014
Setälä O, Fleming-Lehtinen V, Lehtiniemi M (2014) Ingestion and transfer of microplastics in the planktonic food web. Environ Pollut 185:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.013
SETC (2001) On an emergency notice to immediately stop production of disposable foam plastic tableware. In: State Econ. Trade Comm. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2001/content_60799.htm
Shabaka SH, Marey RS, Ghobashy M et al (2020) Thermal analysis and enhanced visual technique for assessment of microplastics in fish from an Urban Harbor, Mediterranean Coast of Egypt. Mar Pollut Bull 159:111465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111465
Shi H, Su L, Cai H et al (2018) Using the Asian clam as an indicator of microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems. Environ Pollut 234:347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.075
Slootmaekers B, Catarci Carteny C, Belpaire C et al (2019) Microplastic contamination in gudgeons (Gobio gobio) from Flemish rivers (Belgium). Environ Pollut 244:675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.136
Song YK, Hong SH, Jang M et al (2014) Large accumulation of micro-sized synthetic polymer particles in the sea surface microlayer. Environ Sci Technol 48:9014–9021. https://doi.org/10.1021/es501757s
Sparks C (2020) Microplastics in mussels along the coast of Cape Town, South Africa. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 104:423–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-020-02809-w
Sruthy S, Ramasamy EV (2017) Microplastic pollution in Vembanad Lake, Kerala, India: the first report of microplastics in the lake and estuarine sediments in India. Environ Pollut 222:315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.038
Stolte A, Forster S, Gerdts G, Schubert H (2015) Microplastic concentrations in beach sediments along the German Baltic coast. Mar Pollut Bull 99:216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.07.022
Strand J, Lassen P, Shashoua Y, Andersen JH (2013) Microplastic particles in sediments from Danish waters. In: ICES annual science conference, 23–27 September 2013, pp 23–27
Tata T, Eddine B, Bououdina M, Bellucci S (2020) Occurrence and characterization of surface sediment microplastics and litter from North African coasts of Mediterranean Sea: preliminary research and first evidence. Sci Total Environ 713:136664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136664
Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP et al (2004) Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science (Washington) 304:838
Toumi H, Abidli S, Bejaoui M (2019) Microplastics in the freshwater environment: the first evaluation in sediments from seven water streams surrounding the lagoon of Bizerte (Northern Tunisia). Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:14673–14682
Vilakati B, Sivasankar V, Mamba BB et al (2020) Characterization of plastic microparticles in the Atlantic Ocean seashore of Cape Town, South Africa, and mass spectrometry analysis of pyrolyzate products. Environ Pollut 265:114859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114859
Wardrop P, Shimeta J, Nugegoda D et al (2016) Chemical pollutants sorbed to ingested microbeads from personal care products accumulate in fish. Environ Sci Technol 50:4037–4044. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06280
Weideman EA, Perold V, Ryan PG (2019) Little evidence that dams in the Orange – Vaal River system trap floating microplastics or microfibres. Mar Pollut Bull 149:110664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110664
Weideman EA, Perold V, Ryan PG (2020) Limited long-distance transport of plastic pollution by the Orange-Vaal River system, South Africa. Sci Total Environ 727:138653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138653
Wiesheu AC, Anger PM, Baumann T et al (2016) Raman microspectroscopic analysis of fibers in beverages. Anal Methods 8:5722–5725. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ay01184e
Yu Q, Hu X, Yang B et al (2020) Distribution, abundance and risks of microplastics in the environment. Chemosphere 249:126059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126059
Yuan W, Liu X, Wang W et al (2019) Microplastic abundance, distribution and composition in water, sediments, and wild fish from Poyang Lake, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 170:180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.126
Zhang K, Shi H, Peng J et al (2018) Microplastic pollution in China’s inland water systems: a review of findings, methods, characteristics, effects, and management. Sci Total Environ 630:1641–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.300
Zhao S, Danley M, Ward JE et al (2017) An approach for extraction, characterization, and quantitation of microplastic in natural marine snow using Raman microscopy. Anal Methods 9:1470–1478. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ay02302a
Ziajahromi S, Neale PA, Rintoul L, Leusch FDL (2017) Wastewater treatment plants as a pathway for microplastics: development of a new approach to sample wastewater-based microplastics. Water Res 112:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.042
Acknowledgements
I thank those organizations, and individuals whom I have used previously published materials. The author apologizes to all people, and organizations whose contribution to these areas may have been reviewed by the fault or not adequately acknowledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TAA writes Conceptualization, Manuscript write up (first and second draft), Visualization, Final reviewing, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aragaw, T.A. Microplastic pollution in African countries’ water systems: a review on findings, applied methods, characteristics, impacts, and managements. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 629 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04619-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04619-z