Physicochemical parameters related to redox condition
The groundwater temperature (GWT) ranged from 28.0 °C to 32.0 °C (Table 1). The average and standard deviations were 30 °C and 1.0. According to Boyd (2000) [35], water temperature has a limited impact on potential redox. Because the values of GWT at the research site are generally similar, we assume that GWT has no significant effect on redox conditions in the aquifer. Furthermore, the groundwater has low ORP values, i.e., between − 84 and − 6 mV, with an average of − 34 mV and standard deviation of 20 (Table 1). ORP is an indicator of reduction potential; thus, low ORP values imply a low redox environment [36].
Table 1 Groundwater physiochemicals data in the study area The sequence of redox conditions is explained by DO, NO3−–N, SO42−, and CO2 [14, 37]. These parameters are responsible for electron acceptors that exhibit an inverse correlation with Fe2+ and Mn2+. Indeed, the disappearance of electron acceptors results in the appearance of trace metals [37]. DO contents are heterogenous at each sampling point with a positive skewness distribution. The studied groundwater samples have a DO range from 0.0 to 6.0 mg/L, with an average value and standard deviation of 2.2 mg/L and 1.6 (Table 1). DO is one of the most sensitive components for redox evaluation [38]. According to McMahon and Chappelle (2008) [14], oxic conditions may occur when DO contents ≥ 0.5 mg/L. In comparison, Boyd (2000) [35] reported a high possibility of reductive environments at DO values less than 1 or 2 mg/L. Similar to DO, DOC contents vary with a right-skewed distribution across the studied locations. DOC contents range approximately from 0.45 to 19.0 mg/L, with an average value of 3.2 mg/L and a standard deviation of 3.69 (Table 1). DOC concentrations of > 1 mg/L are undesirable in groundwater since high concentrations can induce the hazardous mobilization of heavy metals [39].
Furthermore, NO3−–N varies from 0.01 to 5.2 mg/L with an average of 0.4 mg/L (Table 1). Concentrations of nitrate are distributed with a positive skewness and a standard deviation of 1.1. Although Indramayu is dominated by agricultural areas, NO3−–N concentrations are low (< 1 mg/L); few points have relatively high concentrations, such as DH07 (3.2 mg/L) and DH13 (5.2 mg/L); however, these relatively high concentrations are still below the clean water quality standard, which is 10 mg/L [17]. Our previous studies discovered that ammonium–nitrogen predominated as a dissolved inorganic nitrogen species (Table 1) [28, 40]. Unlike ammonium, which is stable under the reductive condition, nitrate is very stable under oxic conditions [14, 36,37,38]. Therefore, it is conceivable that the groundwater is undergoing nitrate reduction processes.
SO42− concentrations vary between 0.2 and 3117 mg/L with an average of 469 mg/L, and a standard deviation of 711 (Table 1). The Indonesian Government Regulations (2001) [17] state that clean water should have SO42− concentrations of ≤ 400 mg/L. Based on this regulation, only a small part of the study locality has concentrations over the threshold. Like nitrate, sulfate is stable under oxic conditions. However, the decreases in sulfate concentration may also be related to other process, for example, dilution and precipitation [37, 41]. Therefore, differing from DO and NO3−–N, sulfate concentrations alone are not suitable for a general description of the redox condition.
Hydrochemical characteristics
The groundwater samples have EC values varying from 546 to 38,600 μS/cm with a standard deviation of 11,751 (Table 1). The Schoeller–Berkaloff diagram was created based on the EC's frequency distribution in the groundwater samples (Fig. 3). The groundwater samples of facies C and D (particularly D) have the similar patterns of cations and anions to seawater, which has significantly high concentrations of Na+ + K+ and Cl−, but low concentrations of HCO3−. Moreover, the major-ion patterns of groundwater samples in facies A and B (particularly A) are more likely to be similar to river-water samples. There was an enrichment of Na+ + K+, but the HCO3− content is relatively dominant within facies A and B. The seawater influences are arrayed from greatest to lowest in facies D, C, B, and A.
The piper diagram in Fig. 4 supports the previous interpretations. The groundwater of facies A (EC < 1400 μS/cm) shows an indication of freshening; facies B (EC between 1400 and < 3000 μS/cm) implies a mixing between seawater and freshwater, and facies C (EC of 3000– < 11,000 μS/cm) and D (EC > 11,000 μS/cm) experience seawater influences [37]. Samples from facies A and B are located in agriculture and residential areas; conversely, facies C and D are mostly taken from brackish-water aquaculture sites. In proportion to the EC values, facies C and D also have high Cl− contents (> 1,200 mg/L), which are unsuitable for drinking water. This high concentration of Cl− can feasibly be derived from marine sediments and brackish-water pond (see Figs. 1 and 2).
Fe2+ and Mn2+ relationship and distribution
The concentration of Fe2+ varies between 0.10 and 252 mg/L with an average of 10.3 mg/L and a standard deviation of 47 (Table 1). Likewise, Mn2+ contents have a considerable variation from 0.02 to 21.6 mg/L with an average and standard variation of 3.6 mg/L and 5.6, respectively (Table 1). Both elements have a positive skewness distribution. Locality DH05 exhibits significantly higher contents of Fe2+ (252 mg/L) and Mn2+ (21.6 mg/L) coupled with high concentrations of DOC (19.0 mg/L) and undetected DO (0.0 mg/L); therefore, low redox conditions are very possible. Additionally, following Indonesian Government Regulations (2001) [17], clean water should contain Fe2+ ≤ 0.3 mg/L and Mn2+ ≤ 1 mg/L. Thus, < 50% and > 60% of samples exhibit the excess concentrations of Fe2+ and Mn2+, respectively. The highest concentrations are primarily located in the north tip of the area (Fig. 5a, b) where coastal and deltaic deposits and brackish-water aquaculture are the dominant geology and land use, respectively (Figs. 1 and 2).
A bivariate graph of Fe2+ and Mn2+ (Fig. 6) shows a moderate relationship between their concentrations (R2 = 0.41) with highly significant correlation (P-value < 0.001). This implies non-homogenous geochemical processes, such as different contents of minerals in the aquifer system and different rates of mineral dissolution. Another possibility, suggested by Carretero and Kruse (2015) [42], is the different redox potential of samples; for instance, in a particular redox potential, Mn could be reduced, while Fe remains oxidized. Additionally, Fe2+ is generally present at higher concentrations than Mn2+ [6, 10]; however, some regions, such as DH03, DH25, and DH28, have significantly higher concentrations of Mn2+ than Fe2+. This confirms the heterogenous geochemical nature of the aquifer at Indramayu, in which Fe2+ and Mn2+ are irregularly dispersed.