Abstract
The current study proposes the concept of ‘postdigital temporality’ as a technologically enabled configuration of the intra-actional interplay of ventriloquized time-bound agencies. To this end, it draws on the model of ventriloquism and the postdigital concept of intra-actional agency. The notion of ‘postdigital time’ is a key concept in the paper, providing it with an entry point for interpreting the dislocation of agency as materially incarnated in a distribution of intra-acting agents across and between human and non-human actants by underlying the resulting reconfigured temporalities. This theoretical approach has helped recognize the emergence of the polysemiotic temporalities offered by the interface and appropriated by human actants in the intra-actional context of the Visit a City app. The result is a materialized another postdigital context of touristscape which is no longer temporally bounded to linear, portioned, clockwork activities such as shopping, visiting touristic destinations, or enjoying attractions but acknowledges permeable, fluid, and multiple practices. In this regard, the proposed ‘postdigital’ touristscape of Egypt, as presented in the app, is argued to be a ‘dislocated locus’ where various agentive entities and digital/analog activities make their own presence in the scene. The postdigital Egypt is encapsulated in a performative scene where time is somewhat disjointed, fragmented, and yet augmented; a scene where eventfulness seems to be invariably cohabiting with iterability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.visitacity.visitacityapp&hl=en&gl=US&pli=1. Accessed 29 April 2024.
Passion/action exchange is inextricably related to another interesting aspect in ventriloquism which is the notion of ‘vacillation’ or ‘oscillation’ identified by Goldblatt (2006) and recalled by Cooren. This notion explains that ‘whenever someone positions herself as speaking in the name or for someone or something, this person also is supposed to be animated by the figure she is invoking’ (Cooren 2010b: 135) (emphasis original). Oscillation/vacillation thus expresses the movement of agency between human and non-human actants back and forth in a harmonious rhythm.
See https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.visitacity.visitacityapp. Accessed 7 May 2024.
References
Alexenberg, M. (2011). The Future of Art in a Postdigital Age: From Hellenistic to Hebraic Consciousness. Bristol: Intellect.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Barad, K., & Kleinman, A. (2012). Intra-actions. Mousse Magazine, 34, 76–81.
Bassett, C. (2015). Not Now? Feminism, Technology, Postdigital. In D. Berry & M. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation, and Design (pp. 136–150). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437204_11.
Berry, D., & Dieter, M. (Eds.) (2015). Postdigital Aesthetics. Springer.
Blommaert, J. (2022). Political Discourse in Post-Digital Societies. In C. W. Chun (Ed.), Applied Linguistics and Politics (pp. 21-31). London: Bloomsbury.
Caronia, L., & Mortari, L. (2015). The Agency of Things: How Spaces and Artefacts Organize the Moral Order of an Intensive Care Unit. Social Semiotics, 25(4), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1059576.
Cooren, F. (2000). The Organizing Property of Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cooren, F. (2010a). Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Ventriloquism and Incarnation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cooren, F. (2010b). Figures of Communication and Dialogue: Passion, Ventriloquism and Incarnation. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.006.
Cooren, F. (2012). Communication Theory at the Center: Ventriloquism and the Communicative Constitution of Reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x.
Cooren, F. (2016). Ethics for Dummies: Ventriloquism and Responsibility. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 24(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2016.1113963.
Cooren, F. (2018). Materializing Communication: Making the Case for a Relational Ontology, Journal of Communication, 68(2), 278–288,
Cooren, F., & Matte, F. (2010). For a constitutive pragmatics: Obama, Médecins Sans Frontiéres and the measuring stick. Pragmatics and Society, 1(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.1.1.02coo.
Cramer, F. (2015). What is ‘post-digital’? In D. M. Berry & M. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design (pp. 12–26). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437204_2.
Dwiartama, A., & Christopher, R. (2014). “Exploring Agency Beyond Humans: The Compatibility of Actor Network Theory (ANT) and Resilience Thinking. Ecology and Society 19(3), 28.
Ford, D. R. (2019). Politics and Pedagogy in the “Post-Truth” Era: Insurgent Philosophy and Praxis. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 168 Pp. ISBN: 9781350059900 (Pbk). Postdigital Science and Education 1, 265–269 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0019-2.
Ford, D. R. (2023). Postdigital Time. In P. Jandrić (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Postdigital Science and Education. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_21-2.
Goldblatt, D. (2006). Art and Ventriloquism: Critical Voices in Art, Theory and Culture. London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2017). Symbiogenesis, sympoiesis, and art science activisms for staying with the trouble. In A. Tsing, H. Swanson, E. Gan, & N. Bubandt (Eds.), Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet (pp. M25-M50). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Hayes, S. (2021). The Value of Postdigital Humans as Objects, or Subjects, in McDonaldised Society. In M. Savin-Baden (Ed.), Postdigital Humans: Transitions, Transformations and Transcendence (pp. 71–88). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65592-1_5.
Hurley, Z., & Al-Ali, K. (2021). Feminist Postdigital Inquiry in the Ruins of Pandemic Universities. Postdigital Science and Education 3, 771–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00254-4.
Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the Age of Digital Reason. Rotterdam: Sense.
Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital Science and Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000.
Jandrić, P., Ryberg, T., Knox, J., Lacković, N., Hayes, S., Suoranta, J., Smith, M., Steketee, A., Peters, M. A., McLaren, P., Ford, D. R., Asher, G., McGregor, C., Stewart, G., Williamson, B., & Gibbons, A. (2019). Postdigital Dialogue. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0011-x.
Jordan, S. (2019). Postdigital Storytelling: Poetics, Praxis, Research. London: Routledge.
Kolb, G., Tervo, J., & Tavin, K. (2021). Introduction: It’s All Over! Post-digital, Post-internet Art and Education. In K. Tavin, G. Kolb, & J. Tervo (Eds.), Post-Digital, Post-Internet Art and Education (pp. 1–24). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73770-2_1.
Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2010). Foreword—Who is Making the Dummy Speak? In F. Cooren (Ed.), Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism (pp. xiii–xvi). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438.
Macgilchrist, F. (2021). Theories of Postdigital Heterogeneity: Implications for Research on Education and Datafication. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 660–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00232-w.
Matthews, A. (2021). Blurring Boundaries Between Humans and Technology: Postdigital, Postphenomenology and Actor-Network Theory in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1836508.
Nathues, E., van Vuuren, M., & Cooren. F. (2021). Speaking about Vision, Talking in the Name of so Much More: A Methodological Framework for Ventriloquial Analyses in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 42(9), 1457–1476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620934063.
Pennycook, A. (2017). Translanguaging and Semiotics Assemblage. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315810.
Rockhill, G. (2019). Temporal Economies and the Prison of the Present: From the Crisis of the Now to Liberation Time. Diacritics, 47(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2019.0008.
Rose, G. (2017). Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1270195.
Roy, A. (2020). The pandemic is a portal. Financial Times, 3 April. https://www.ft.com/content/10d8f5e8-74eb-11ea-95fefcd274e920ca. Accessed June 2023.
Salama, A. H. Y., & Fawzy, R. M. (2023a). The Constitution of Dubai’s Mobile-App Mediated Spatiotemporal Glocalization: Postphenomenology and Postdigitality in Dialogue. Space and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312231159222.
Salama, A. H. Y., & Fawzy, R. M. (2023b). The spatiotemporal constitution of Dubai as a semiotically assembled touristscape. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 27(3), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-31963.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.
Tagg, C., & Lyons, A. (2020). Post-digital linguistic ethnography and the networked individual. Working Papers in Translanguaging and Translation (WP. 38). https://tlang.org.uk/. Accessed 29 April 2024.
Vásquez, C., & Cooren, F. (2013). Spacing practices: The communicative configuration of organizing through space-times. Communication Theory, 23(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12003.
Zhang, X., Tham, A., Liu, Y., Spinks, W., & Wang, L. (2021). ‘To market, to market’: Uncovering Daigou touristscapes within Chinese outbound tourism. Journal of China Tourism Research, 17(4), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2021.1968554.
Funding
The second author acknowledges that this study is supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number (PSAU/2024/R/1445).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fawzy, R.M., Salama, A.H.Y. Unravelling the Intra-actional Postdigital Temporality of Touristscapes. Postdigit Sci Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00474-4
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00474-4