Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parametric Evaluation and Dynamic Analysis of Turbine Blades–Damper Assembly Using Bond Graph Technique

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Gas turbine blades are subjected to fluctuating gas forces and centrifugal forces, which result into large resonant stresses and further lead to the failure of blades. Nowadays, dry friction damping is frequently applied in gas turbines, especially at hot locations, to reduce resonant stresses. The novelty of the paper lies in simulation of an assembly consists of two gas turbine blades and an under-platform damper through bond graph modelling technique. In this research work, dynamic behaviour of turbine blade and under-platform friction damper are obtained by evaluating their parameters.

Method

A lumped parameter model is developed for turbine blades and damper assembly. Further, the values of equivalent damping coefficient (Ceq) for an under-platform friction damper are evaluated through Lazan’s law. For simulation, a discrete bond graph model of the turbine blades–damper assembly is created and simulated through Runge–Kutta method.

Results and Conclusions

The dynamic parameters viz. displacement, velocity and force on turbine blades, damper’s displacement, velocity and frictional force of under-platform damper for all varying values of equivalent damping coefficients (Ceq) are obtained. These evaluated dynamic parameters of turbine blades and under-platform friction damper are further analysed for optimum designing of under platform friction damper to reduce resonant stresses and hence increase the fatigue life of turbine blades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

m :

Mass of the turbine blade

v :

Volume of the turbine blade

m 1 :

Mass of front end of turbine blade1

m 2 :

Mass of rear end of turbine blade1

m 3 :

Mass of rear end of turbine blade2

m 4 :

Mass of front end of turbine blade 2

K 1 :

Stiffness of spring at front end of turbine1

K 2 :

Stiffness of spring at rear end of turbine1

K 3 :

Stiffness of spring at rear end of turbine 2

K 4 :

Stiffness of spring at front end of turbine 2

C 1 :

Damping coefficient at front end of turbine1

C 2 :

Damping coefficient at rear end of turbine1

C 3 :

Damping coefficient at rear end of turbine 2

C 4 :

Damping coefficient at front end of turbine 2

Ceq:

Equivalent damping coefficient of under-platform friction damper

K eq :

Equivalent spring stiffness of under-platform friction damper

f 1 :

First resonant frequency of the turbine blade

f 2 :

Second resonant frequency of the turbine blade

f 3 :

Resonant frequency of turbine blades with fixed root and having friction damper that limit platform motion

m damper :

Mass of under-platform friction damper

ω n1 :

First modal frequency of under-platform friction damper

ω n6 :

Sixth modal frequency of under-platform friction damper

W 0 :

Total strain energy of damper

σ :

Yield strength of material

D :

Specific damping energy in kNm/m3/ cycle

J :

Constant of proportionality

n :

Damping exponent

σ :

Yield strength of material

σ e :

Fatigue strength of material.

D 0 :

Total damping energy dissipated within volume (v)

P :

Pressure act on leading edge of turbine blade by impinge of gas stream

A :

Area of turbine blade

ξ:

Damping coefficient

η :

Loss factor

D :

Damper’s displacement

V :

Damper’s velocity

F :

Damper’s friction force

References

  1. Rani S, Agrawal AK, Rastogi V (2017) Failure analysis of a first stage IN738 gas turbine blade tip cracking in a thermal power plant. Case Stud Eng Fail Anal 8:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Griffin JH (1980) Friction damping of resonant stresses in gas turbine airfoils. J Eng Power 102(2):329–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Griffin JH (1990) A review of friction damping of turbine blade vibration. Int J Turbo Jet Eng 7(3–4):297–307

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ostachowicz W (1989) The harmonic balance method for determining the vibration parameters in damped dynamic systems. J Sound Vib 131(3):465–473

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanliturk KY, Ewins DJ, Imregun M (1997) Harmonic balance vibration analysis of turbine blades with friction dampers. ASME J Vib Acoust 119(1):96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazan BJ (1968) Damping of materials and members in structural mechanics, vol 214. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamidipoor I, Golsanamlou N, Zare I, Moradi P (2015) The impact of blade and material damping in turbine blades. Int J Sci Qual Anal 1(3):64–68

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris CM, Crede CE (1976) Shock and vibration handbook. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Csaba G (1998) Forced response analysis in time and frequency domains of a tuned bladed disk with friction dampers. J Sound Vib 214(3):395–412

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zucca S, Firrone CM, Gola M (2012) Modeling underplatform dampers for turbine blades: a refined approach in the frequency domain. J Vib Control 19(7):1087–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfeiffer F, Hajek M (1992) Stick slip motion of turbine blade dampers. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond 338(1651):503–517

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanliturk KY, Ewins DJ, Stanbridge AB (2001) Under-platform dampers for turbine blades: theoretical, modeling, analysis, and comparison with experimental data. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 123:919–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhagi LK, Rastogi V, Gupta P (2016) Study of corrosive fatigue and life enhancement of low pressure steam turbine blade using friction dampers. J Mech Sci Technol 31(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beckman B (2013) Wear of a Gas turbine friction damper, MANE-6960: friction, wear, and lubrication of materials, research project

  15. Firrone CM, Botto D, Gola MM (2006) Modeling a friction damper: analysis of the experimental data and comparison with numerical results. ASME 8th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, pp. 469–478

  16. Firrone CM (2009) Measurements of the kinematics of two under-platform dampers with different geometry and comparison with numerical simulations. J Sound Vib 323(1–2):313–333

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Giridhar RK, Ramaiah PV, Krishnaiah G, Barad SG (2012) Gas turbine blade damper optimization methodology. Adv Acoust Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/316761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rastogi V, Kumar V, Bhagi LK (2012) Dynamic modeling of under-platform damper used in turbomachinery. Int J Mech, Aerosp, Ind, Mechatron Manuf 6:163–172

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petrov EP, Ewins DJ (2003) Analytical formulation of friction interface elements for analysis of nonlinear multiharmonic vibrations of bladed discs. J Turbomach 125:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrov EP, Ewins DJ (2007) Advanced modeling of underplatform friction dampers for analysis of bladed disk vibration. J Turbomach 129(1):143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Siewert C, Panning L, Wallaschek J, Richter C (2010) Multiharmonic forced response analysis of a turbine blading coupled by nonlinear contact forces. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 132(082501):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang BD, Menq CH (1997) Modeling of friction contact and its application to the design of shroud contact. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 119(4):958–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fantetti A, Gastaldi C, Berruti T (2018) Modelling and testing flexible friction dampers: challenges and peculiarities. Exp Tech 42(4):407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Petrov EP (2008) Explicit finite element models of friction dampers in forced response analysis of bladed disks. J Gas Turbines Power 130(2):022502–022511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Srinivasan AV (1997) Flutter and resonant vibration characteristics of engine blades. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 119(4):742–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zucca S, Firrone CM, Gola MM (2012) Numerical assessment of friction damping at turbine blade root joints by simultaneous calculation of the static and dynamic contact loads. Nonlinear Dyn 67:1943–1955

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Shengxi J, Longxi Z, Huang J, Mei Q (2017) Dynamic characteristics analysis and optimization design of a simulated power turbine rotor based on finite element method. Int Conf Turbo Jet-Eng 37(1):31–39

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Antony D, Gopalsamy M, Chaparala BVV, Krishnaraj R (2017) Structural dynamic analysis of turbine blade. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 247:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dundas RE (1998) Review of design parameters in gas turbines for the prospective user. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 1–11

  30. Muszynska A, Jones DIG, Lagnese I, Whitford L (1981) On nonlinear response of multiple blade systems. In: Shock and vibration information center the shock and vibration bull, Part 3. pp. 89–110

  31. Dominic RJ (1984) Parametric study of turbine blade platform friction damping using the lumped parameter analysis. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 84-GT-109, pp. 1–8

  32. Rani S, Agarwal AK, Rastogi V (2019) Vibration analysis for detecting failure mode and crack location in first stage gas turbine blade. J Mech Sci Technol 33(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jarelend MH (2001) Thesis titled- the use of platform dampers to reduce turbine blade vibration Thesis No. 872, Linkoping University, SE-581 83 Linkoping, Sweden

  34. Yuanqiu T, Chaoping Z, Biao Z, Xiaowei W, Petrov EP (2018) Identification of crystal orientation for turbine blades with anisotropy materials. Chin J Aeronaut 31(2):410–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Menq CH, Griffin JH, Bielak J (1985) The influence of microslip on vibratory response, part ii: a comparison with experimental results. J Sound Vib 107(2):295–307

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sextro W, Popp K, Wolter I (1997) Improved reliability of bladed disks due to friction dampers. In: ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Vol. 4: Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy; Ceramics; Structures and Dynamics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education, Orlando, Florida, USA, p. V004T14A035

  37. Umer M (2018) A novel test rig to investigate under-platform damper dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 100:344–359

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Technical Data - NiPERA, IN_738Alloy_PreliminaryData_497_.pd

  39. Kumar MS, Prashnath KS, Subrahmanyam CLS (2013) Determining hysteresis damping in a steam turbine using Lazan’s Law. Int J Adv Eng Technol 4(2):14–16

    Google Scholar 

  40. Darolio R, Walston WS, Nathal MV (1996) NiAl alloys for turbine air-foils. Super-Alloys 1996:561–570

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mukherjee A, Karmakar R (2000) Modelling and simulation of engineering system through bond graph, Narosa publishing House, New Delhi, reprinted by CRC press for North America and by Alpha Science for Europe

  42. Mukherjee A (2005) SYMBOLS Shakti user’s manual, high-tech consultants. STEP, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sushila Rani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

The best way to study the dynamics of a system residing in multi-energy domain is to start with a schematic diagram, which includes its important components and portrays how they are connected together. Bond graph is an explicit graphical tool for capturing the common energy structure of systems. Through Bond Graph approach, a physical system can be represented by symbols and lines, identifying the power flow paths. The lumped parameter elements of resistance, capacitance and inertance are interconnected in an energy conserving way by bonds and junctions resulting in a network structure. From the pictorial representation of the bond graph, the derivation of system equations is so systematic that it can be algorithmized. In bond graphs, one needs to recognise basic symbols, i.e. three basic one port passive elements inertance (I), capacitance (C), and resistance (R); two basic active elements source of effort (SE), and source of flow (SF); and two basic junctions i.e. constant effort junction (0), and constant flow junction (1). The basic variables are effort (e), flow (f), time integral of effort (P) and the time integral of flow (Q).

The constitutive equations obtained from bond graph model of turbine blades with under-platform friction damper are presented as

$$d\left( {{\text{P22}}} \right) \, = \, - {\text{R2}}0 \times {\text{P22}}/{\text{M22 }} - {\text{ K21}} \times {\text{Q21 }} + {\text{ K27}} \times {\text{Q27 }} - {\text{ K3}}0 \times {\text{Q3}}0 \, - {\text{ R31}} \times \left( {{\text{P7}}/{\text{M7 }} + {\text{ P22}}/{\text{M22}}} \right),$$
(11)
$$d\left( {{\text{P17}}} \right) \, = \, - {\text{K27}} \times {\text{Q27 }} + {\text{ SE18 }} - {\text{ R26}} \times {\text{P17}}/{\text{M17,}}$$
(12)
$$d\left( {{\text{P7}}} \right) \, = {\text{ K24}} \times {\text{Q24 }} - {\text{ R8}} \times {\text{P7}}/{\text{M7 }} - {\text{ K9}} \times {\text{Q9 }} - {\text{ K3}}0 \times {\text{Q3}}0 \, - {\text{ R31}} \times \left( {{\text{P7}}/{\text{M7}} + {\text{P22}}/{\text{M22}}} \right),$$
(13)
$$d\left( {{\text{P1}}} \right) \, = {\text{ SE2 }} - {\text{ K24}} \times {\text{Q24 }} - {\text{ R23}} \times {\text{P1}}/{\text{M1,}}$$
(14)
$$d\left( {{\text{Q3}}0} \right) \, = {\text{ P7}}/{\text{M7 }} + {\text{ P22}}/{\text{M22,}}$$
(15)
$$d\left( {{\text{Q27}}} \right) \, = {\text{ P17}}/{\text{M17 }} - {\text{ P22}}/{\text{M22,}}$$
(16)
$$d\left( {{\text{Q24}}} \right) \, = {\text{ P1}}/{\text{M1}} - {\text{P7}}/{\text{M7,}}$$
(17)
$$d\left( {{\text{Q21}}} \right) \, = {\text{ P22}}/{\text{M22,}}$$
(18)
$$d\left( {{\text{Q9}}} \right) \, = {\text{ P7}}/{\text{M7}}{.}$$
(19)

In Eqs. 1119, ‘d’ represents the time derivative of the state variable within the first parenthesis.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rani, S. Parametric Evaluation and Dynamic Analysis of Turbine Blades–Damper Assembly Using Bond Graph Technique. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 12, 681–693 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-00867-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-00867-y

Keywords

Navigation