Abstract
This paper focuses on a transdisciplinary research project in a historically underrepresented public school in Toronto, Canada. At the intersection of elementary science, technology, and arts-based curriculum, the project employs the feminist new materialist practice of “diffraction” (Barad, 2007) in an after-school robotics club. Following a Baradian ethics, an emphasis is placed on the process of designing machines, which illuminates the need for different modes of measurement in educational research that account for the ongoing relationships within collective learning environments.
Résumé
Cet article se penche sur un projet de recherche transdisciplinaire réalisé dans une école publique historiquement sous-représentée, à Toronto, au Canada. Se situant au carrefour des curriculums scolaires de sciences, de technologies et des arts au primaire, le projet applique, dans le cadre d’un club parascolaire de robotique, la nouvelle pratique matérialiste féministe de la « diffraction » (Barad 2007). En s’alignant sur les principes de l’éthique baradienne, l’accent est mis sur le processus de conception des machines, éclairant ainsi le besoin de recourir à différents systèmes de mesure en recherche pédagogique qui tiennent compte des relations continues qui existent au sein d’environnements d’apprentissage collectifs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, S. (2014). Willful subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Alaimo, S. (2016). Exposed: Environmental politics and pleasures in posthuman times. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Alaimo, S., Ray, S., Sibara, J. (2017) Disability studies and the environmental humanities: Toward an eco-crip theory. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Aoki, T. (1993/2005). Legitimating lived curriculum: Toward a curricular landscape of multiplicity. In W.F. Pinar and R.L. Irwin (Eds.). Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 199–215). New York, NY: Routledge.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2010). Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come. Derrida Today 3.2: 240–268.
Barad, K. (2014). Invertebrate visions: Diffractions of the brittlestar. In E. Kirksey (Ed.). The multispecies salon (pp. 221–241). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2017). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: Re-turning, re-membering, and facing the incalculable. New Formations, 92, 56–86.
Braidotti, R. (2000). Teratologies. In I. Buchanan & C. Colebrook (Eds.). Deleuze and feminist theory (pp. 156–22).Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadic Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Colebrook, C. (2016). ‘A grandiose time of co-existence’: Stratigraphy of the Anthropocene. Deleuze Studies, 10(4), 440–454.
Coleman, R. & Ringrose, J. (2013). Deleuze and research methodologies., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
de Freitas, E. (2017). The temporal fabric of research methods: Posthuman social science and the digital data deluge. Research in Education, 98(1), 27–43.
de Freitas, E. (2018). The biosocial subject: Sensor technologies and worldly sensibility. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(2), 292–308.
Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema II: The time-image. (H. Tomlinson & R. Galeta, Trans). Minneapolis, MN: MIT Press.
Grosz, E. (2011). Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics, and art. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Hickey-Moody, A. & Crowley, V. (2010). Disability matters: Pedagogy, media, and affect. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hickey-Moody, A., Palmer, H., & Sayers, E. (2016). Diffractive pedagogies: Dancing across new materialist imaginaries. Gender and Education, 28(2), 213–229.
Jackson, A.Y. & L.A. Mazzei. (2012). Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
Kirksey, E., Schuetze, C., & Shapiro, N. (2011). Poaching at the multispecies salon. Kroeber Anthropological Society, 100(1), 129–153.
Kirksey, E. (2015). (Ed.). Multispecies salon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Manning, E. (2009). Relationscapes: Movement, Art, Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Manning, E. (2015). Against method. In P. Vannini (Ed.). Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 52–71). New York, NY: Routledge.
Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Meeth, L. R. (1978). Interdisciplinary studies: A matter of definition. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 10(7), 10–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1978.10569474
Mioduser, D. & Levy, S.T. (2010). Making sense of building sense: Kindergarten children’s construction and understanding of adaptive robot behaviors. International Journal of Computer Math Learning, 15, 99–127.
Quigley, C.F. & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school Science and Math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426.
Rotas, N. (2015). Running ecologies: Thinking movement pedagogically. Inflexions, 8, 185–189.
Rotas, N. (2018). Mashing: A practice that makes vision felt. In Hodgins, D. (Ed.). Lively doings and dialogues in feminist post-qualitative childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.
Saldanha, A. & Stark, H. (2016). A new earth: Deleuze and Guattari in the Anthropocene. Deleuze Studies, 10(4), 427–439.
Sinay, E., Jaipal-Jamani, K., Nahorick, A., & Douglin, M. (2016). STEM teaching and learning in the Toronto District School Board: Toward a strong theoretical foundation and scaling up from initial implementation of the K-12 STEM strategy. Research Series I. (Research Report No. 15/16–16. Toronto District School Board. Toronto: CAN.
St. Pierre, E.A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (4 th Ed.) (pp. 611–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
St. Pierre, E.A. (2013). The Appearance of Data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 13: 223–227.
St. Pierre, E.A. (2017). Deleuze and Guattari’s language for new empirical inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49(11): 1080–1089.
Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics II. (R. Bononno, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
TallBear, K. (2015). Theorizing queer inhumanisms: An Indigenous reflection on working beyond the human/not human. CLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2–3), 230–235.
Thompson, C.W. (2012). Place to be wild in nature. In K. Jorgensen & R. Keenan (Eds.). Urban Wildscapes (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Routledge.
Tsing, A.L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tsing, A.L., Swanson, H., Gan, E., & Bubandt, N. (2017). Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts and monsters of the anthropocene. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R. (Eds.). (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.
Van Dooren, T. (2016). Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rotas, N. Debugging Robotic Machines in Transdisciplinary Spaces. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ. 18, 232–241 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0028-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0028-x