Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Debugging Robotic Machines in Transdisciplinary Spaces

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on a transdisciplinary research project in a historically underrepresented public school in Toronto, Canada. At the intersection of elementary science, technology, and arts-based curriculum, the project employs the feminist new materialist practice of “diffraction” (Barad, 2007) in an after-school robotics club. Following a Baradian ethics, an emphasis is placed on the process of designing machines, which illuminates the need for different modes of measurement in educational research that account for the ongoing relationships within collective learning environments.

Résumé

Cet article se penche sur un projet de recherche transdisciplinaire réalisé dans une école publique historiquement sous-représentée, à Toronto, au Canada. Se situant au carrefour des curriculums scolaires de sciences, de technologies et des arts au primaire, le projet applique, dans le cadre d’un club parascolaire de robotique, la nouvelle pratique matérialiste féministe de la « diffraction » (Barad 2007). En s’alignant sur les principes de l’éthique baradienne, l’accent est mis sur le processus de conception des machines, éclairant ainsi le besoin de recourir à différents systèmes de mesure en recherche pédagogique qui tiennent compte des relations continues qui existent au sein d’environnements d’apprentissage collectifs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2014). Willful subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, S. (2016). Exposed: Environmental politics and pleasures in posthuman times. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, S., Ray, S., Sibara, J. (2017) Disability studies and the environmental humanities: Toward an eco-crip theory. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, T. (1993/2005). Legitimating lived curriculum: Toward a curricular landscape of multiplicity. In W.F. Pinar and R.L. Irwin (Eds.). Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 199–215). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2010). Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come. Derrida Today 3.2: 240–268.

  • Barad, K. (2014). Invertebrate visions: Diffractions of the brittlestar. In E. Kirksey (Ed.). The multispecies salon (pp. 221–241). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2017). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: Re-turning, re-membering, and facing the incalculable. New Formations, 92, 56–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2000). Teratologies. In I. Buchanan & C. Colebrook (Eds.). Deleuze and feminist theory (pp. 156–22).Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadic Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook, C. (2016). ‘A grandiose time of co-existence’: Stratigraphy of the Anthropocene. Deleuze Studies, 10(4), 440–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. & Ringrose, J. (2013). Deleuze and research methodologies., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, E. (2017). The temporal fabric of research methods: Posthuman social science and the digital data deluge. Research in Education, 98(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, E. (2018). The biosocial subject: Sensor technologies and worldly sensibility. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(2), 292–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema II: The time-image. (H. Tomlinson & R. Galeta, Trans). Minneapolis, MN: MIT Press.

  • Grosz, E. (2011). Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics, and art. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A. & Crowley, V. (2010). Disability matters: Pedagogy, media, and affect. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A., Palmer, H., & Sayers, E. (2016). Diffractive pedagogies: Dancing across new materialist imaginaries. Gender and Education, 28(2), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A.Y. & L.A. Mazzei. (2012). Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirksey, E., Schuetze, C., & Shapiro, N. (2011). Poaching at the multispecies salon. Kroeber Anthropological Society, 100(1), 129–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirksey, E. (2015). (Ed.). Multispecies salon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Manning, E. (2009). Relationscapes: Movement, Art, Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E. (2015). Against method. In P. Vannini (Ed.). Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 52–71). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meeth, L. R. (1978). Interdisciplinary studies: A matter of definition. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 10(7), 10–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1978.10569474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mioduser, D. & Levy, S.T. (2010). Making sense of building sense: Kindergarten children’s construction and understanding of adaptive robot behaviors. International Journal of Computer Math Learning, 15, 99–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, C.F. & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school Science and Math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotas, N. (2015). Running ecologies: Thinking movement pedagogically. Inflexions, 8, 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotas, N. (2018). Mashing: A practice that makes vision felt. In Hodgins, D. (Ed.). Lively doings and dialogues in feminist post-qualitative childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldanha, A. & Stark, H. (2016). A new earth: Deleuze and Guattari in the Anthropocene. Deleuze Studies, 10(4), 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinay, E., Jaipal-Jamani, K., Nahorick, A., & Douglin, M. (2016). STEM teaching and learning in the Toronto District School Board: Toward a strong theoretical foundation and scaling up from initial implementation of the K-12 STEM strategy. Research Series I. (Research Report No. 15/16–16. Toronto District School Board. Toronto: CAN.

  • St. Pierre, E.A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (4 th Ed.) (pp. 611–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, E.A. (2013). The Appearance of Data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 13: 223–227.

  • St. Pierre, E.A. (2017). Deleuze and Guattari’s language for new empirical inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49(11): 1080–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics II. (R. Bononno, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.

  • TallBear, K. (2015). Theorizing queer inhumanisms: An Indigenous reflection on working beyond the human/not human. CLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2–3), 230–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C.W. (2012). Place to be wild in nature. In K. Jorgensen & R. Keenan (Eds.). Urban Wildscapes (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A.L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A.L., Swanson, H., Gan, E., & Bubandt, N. (2017). Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts and monsters of the anthropocene. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R. (Eds.). (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.

  • Van Dooren, T. (2016). Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikki Rotas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rotas, N. Debugging Robotic Machines in Transdisciplinary Spaces. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ. 18, 232–241 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0028-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0028-x

Keywords

Navigation