Abstract
A greater genetic diversity is essential for disease resistance in particular, and intergeneric hybridization makes this possible. The genus Cydomalus (syn: Cydolus), which is frequently used as rootstock, was derived from intergeneric hybridization between Cydonia oblonga Mill. and Malus domestica Borkh in Moldova and Bulgaria. It is known that hybrids from this genus exhibit quince and/or apple characteristics and some of them have been identified with reddish fruit skin color in Türkiye in the last decade. Erwinia amylovora Burril. is the most devastating bacterial disease in the Rosaceae family, and there have been no reports of Cydomalus. In this study, fire blight susceptibility index of three Cydomalus genotypes, were collected from İzmir and Manisa provinces, and two important quince rootstocks were determined by artificial inoculations with the most virulent Erwinia amylovora strain of our collection, under greenhouse conditions for two consecutive years. In addition, susceptibility levels of two Cydomalus genotypes were observed under natural disease pressure habitats. In line with the results of artificial inoculations, two of Cydomalus genotypes were determined to be more tolerant to fire blight disease than quince rootstocks and these genotypes could be used in breeding studies. Moreover, Cydomalus genus was identified as the new host for Erwinia amylovora.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Fire blight caused by Erwinia amylovora Burril. is a disease that mostly affects plants of the Rosaceae family with complicated and rapidly developing pathogenicity. Especially in Malus spp. and Pyrus spp. molecular mechanisms of disease are well understood, but management remains challenging because it is controlled by multiple genes and influenced by environmental factors (Norelli et al. 2001; Sobiczewski et al. 2015; Bell 2019; Pompili et al. 2019). Studies have identified quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in various apple and pear progenies, suggesting resistance genes may be present in less susceptible parents (Calenge et al. 2005; Emeriewen et al. 2014; Bell 2019; Kostick et al. 2021). Furthermore, transgenic lines were generated using the CRISPR/Cas9-FLP/FRT-based gene editing system, resulting in the knock-out of the susceptibility protein “MdDIPM4” in susceptible Malus domestica varieties. This suggests increased resistance and the possibility of transgenic apple varieties (Pompili et al. 2019; Peil et al. 2021). In the quince (Cydonia oblonga Miller.), the beginning of studies on the determination of the resistance status of genotypes, the inheritance of the disease and its connections with some morphological features date back to the recent past and molecular studies have not been done yet (Abdollahi et al. 2008; Ozrenk et al. 2012; Şahin 2017; Şahin et al. 2019a, b, 2020b).
Although the mechanism of fire blight resistance varies from species to species, it is generally controlled synergistically by multiple genes, which complicates breeding studies (Korban et al. 1988; Evrenosoğlu et al. 2020; Şahin et al. 2020b). Some breeders focus on hybridization breeding not only within species but also between species in order to obtain individuals with higher resistance (Van der Zwet et al. 1974; Gardner et al. 1980; Korban et al. 1988; Andreies 2002; Bokszczanin et al. 2012; Evrenosoğlu et al. 2020; Şahin et al. 2020b). The most significant source of genetic diversity for creating new varieties, which may be exploited to create unique morphological forms and mix traits from two genera, is interspecific hybridization (Kamiri et al. 2018).
When reviewing intergeneric hybridization researches on pome fruit species, numerous studies are found, primarily focusing on hybrids between Malus x Pyrus and Pyrus x Cydonia. Some of these hybrids have been subjected to testing for fire blight disease and their efficacy in breeding studies has been determined (Trabut 1916; Rudenko and Rotaru 1970; Inoue et al. 2003; Postman 2011; Fischer et al. 2014; Pasqualetto et al. 2023). In addition to these, Cydomalus (syn: Cydolus) genus is another important intergeneric hybridization that was obtained by crossing between Cydonia x Malus, which is known for its use as rootstock in both quince and apple species (De Paoli et al. 2002; Wertheim 2002). The breeding studies between Cydonia x Malus and Malus x Cydonia were started by Burbank in the 1950s (Burbank 1955) and then continued with Ryabov (1970). The hybrids obtained in the 1950s were determined to be sterile, and in the results of the study conducted in 1970, hybrids with weak plant growth and quince phenotypic characteristics were developed (Burbank 1955; Ryabov 1970). The most successful results were obtained from the studies conducted by Rudenko (1970) and Rudenko and Rudenko (1994) in Moldova and Bulgaria in which 47 hybrids were obtained at different ploidy levels. Morphological features and ploidy levels of hybrids in F1, F2 and F3 levels were determined and it was observed that all individuals in these levels were allodiploid, allotriploid, and allotetraploid, respectivelty (Rudenko and Rudenko 1994). In this study, also Rudenko and Rudenko (1994) published some characteristics of these hybrids and mentioned that the fruit skin color turned pink in a sun-exposed part of the fruits of a hybrid determined as allotetraploid at the F2 level. Interestingly, the existence of Cydomalus genotypes showing red skin color fruit characteristics in Türkiye has been mentioned in both newspaper reports and scientific publications for the last 10 years (Şahin and Mısırlı 2016). The first genotype was identified by Şahin in Seferihisar in 2012 and afterwards, two more genotypes were determined through PhD study and personal interviews (unpublished data, Şahin, M; Şahin 2017). These Cydomalus genotypes are thought to be hybrids obtained by Rudenko and Rudenko (1994) or new individuals formed by open pollination of these genotypes in natural conditions, but there is no conclusive evidence.
Through artificial inoculations and natural fire blight epidemic conditions, the current study aimed to evaluate the resistance status of three Cydomalus genotypes with a focus on their potential as parents in fire blight resistance breeding. Furthermore, their susceptibility levels were compared with common quince rootstocks in Türkiye because of their extensive use of the latter as a rootstock worldwide.
For this purpose, three Cydomalus genotypes selected from İzmir and Manisa location and two quince rootstocks (Quince A, Quince C) have been used as a plant material. Detailed information about genotypes is given in the Table 1. In artificial inoculations, ten seedlings for each genotype were used. All plant material preserved in the Aegean Agricultural Research Institute (AARI) Quince Field Gene Bank and artificial inoculations were also carried out at AARI. Since there was only one tree in the field conditions (natural habitat), scoring was made based on one tree.
The fire blight susceptibility indexes (SI) of all genotypes and rootstocks were defined by artificial inoculations in full automatic greenhouse conditions (24–27 °C temperatures, 70–75% relative humidity). Wild-type Erwinia amylovora strain Ea-223, determined to be the most virulent among the strains in our stock (Şahin et al. 2019a, b), was used at artificial inoculations. Inoculations were carried out on the same material for two consecutive years (2019–2020) when shoots were in an active growing period, via cutting immediately below the terminal leaves with scissors that were dipped in concentration of 108 cfu ml− 1 bacterial inoculum (Şahin et al. 2020a). After inoculations, plants were wrapped in plastic bags for 72 h to maintain relative humidity levels between 95 and 100% (Şahin et al. 2020a). Measurements were done according to Şahin et al. (2020a) by proportioning the diseased shoot length to the total shoot length at the 28th day following inoculation, and classified with Gardner scale as follows: 0–10% SI, highly resistant; 11–30% SI, resistant; 31–50% SI, moderately susceptible; 51–90% SI, susceptible; and 91–100% SI, highly susceptible (Gardner et al. 1980). Disease symptoms in Cydomalus genotypes were also observed. Statistical analyses were conducted using two-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s post hoc test using JMP pro 13 statistical software. Normality of residuals was investigated before analyses.
In addition to artificial inoculation, the susceptibility levels of two Cydomalus genotypes (Seferihisar, Güzelbahçe) to fire blight in natural field conditions was determined for two years using USDA marking system (Fig. 1) based on percentage of infected trees and tissue age (Layne and Quamme 1975). Disease observations were made on a 10-year-old tree identified an area where it was thought to have grown naturally. Scores are numbered from 10 to 1 to indicate the age of infected tissue and the overall rate of blight on the tree, with the highest score indicating the least damage. Accordingly, the classes are; highly resistant (score: 10 − 8) 0–6% wood blight; moderately resistant (score: 7 − 6) 7–25% wood blight; susceptible (score: 5) 26–50% wood blight; very sensitive (score: 4 − 1) was determined as 51–100% wood blight (Van der Zwet et al. 1974).
USDA marking system based on percentage of infected trees and tissue age (black indicates infected tissue) (Layne and Quamme 1975)
This is the first research to assess the levels of fire blight resistance, as well as to describe disease symptoms in Cydomalus genotypes with artificial inoculation and natural conditions. Moreover, Cydomalus genus has been identified as the new host for Erwinia amylovora Burril. The first symptom was observed on Cydomalus and Cydonia oblonga rootstocks nearly 90 and 72 h after inoculation with shoot tips being water soaked, respectively. The usual shepherd’s crooks appearance seen in pome fruit species was also seen in Cydomalus (Fig. 2a). During the four-week observations, while the disease progression continued rapidly in quince rootstocks, a split point occurred at the shoot tip in the 1st week in Cydomalus genotypes; QFBNT45-4 and Seferihisar (Fig. 2a), and the progression of the disease was stopped. In these Cydomalus genotypes, new shoot growth was observed from the point where the development of the disease stopped and no disease progression was observed in this new shoot (Fig. 2b). Re-growth was also observed in all plants of the two quince rootstocks, but disease development occurred on new shoots.
Disease symptoms are consistent with previous studies determined in many Rosaceae family members (Lecomte and Cadic 1992; Ozrenk et al. 2012; Şahin et al. 2020a; Pánková et al. 2023). Like QFBNT45-4 and Seferihisar Cydomalus genotypes, Przybyla et al. (2012) found that the Hessle pear cultivar response to pathogen infection was stable after inoculation, indicating that resistance was triggered quickly and maintained.
When the results of artificial inoculations are examined, only the difference between genotypes was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.0001) in artificial inoculations (Table 2).
SI varied between 11.53 and 48.64 in a two-term period after artificial inoculations (Table 3). When the period averages were taken into account, the individuals with the highest resistance with 12.25% SI of QFBNT45-4 and 16.01% SI of Seferihisar, respectively in the same statistical significant level. The genotypes examined showed that both Quince A (46.96%) and Quince C (47.41%) rootstocks were susceptible at the same level of statistical significance.
The SI value of quince rootstock inoculated with a combination of the three virulent isolates was established in a previous study (Şahin et al. 2020a) as 42.68% SI as a result of the average of three periods, which is similar to this study. The SI varied between 40 and 60% in studies including the quince rootstocks BA 29 (53%), Quince C (55%), Quince A (58%), Sydo (58%), and Adam’s (58%). All of these rootstocks have been identified in the “susceptible” group (Lespinasse and Aldwinckle 2000). It is clear that performing multiple inoculation trials is essential for evaluating fire blight resistance, as demonstrated by Barritt et al. (2004), Sobiczewski et al. (2015)d nková et al. (2023). There are studies that demonstrate the significance of year and genotype interactions in different species of pome fruit (Korba et al. 2013; Harshman et al. 2017; Şahin et al. 2020a). The inoculation period and interactions were not significant in our study, demonstrating that the greenhouse conditions were optimal.
Not only SI levels of Cydomalus genotypes and quince rootstocks were investigated with artificial inoculations over two term but also natural infection levels were observed on two Cydomalus genotypes at the selection areas. In natural infection conditions, statistical analysis was not performed, only scoring was done. Because of two-year field observations, disease rates in both types varied between 1 and 3 to 4–6% (Fig. 1; Table 4).
The genotype QFBNT45-4 was found to be highly resistant to fire blight in the field surveys done previously (Şahin 2017) in 2015 and 2016, with a disease rate of 1–3% (score 9) in both years, under natural infection conditions in the field. As a result of our observations, Seferihisar and QFBNT45-4 genotypes, which were determined to have high resistance in field conditions, obtained similar results in artificial inoculations (Tables 3 and 4). As was done in this study, after the inoculation of shoots, the susceptibility of genotypes may be measured using a variety of techniques and it seems that the shoot’s level of lesion development served that objective the best (Przybyla et al. 2012).
On the other hand, evaluation of both natural and artificial inoculations is important in resistance breeding studies. Host resistance can help to promote fruit production that is resilient and sustainable. There is a chance that cultivars and rootstocks that are both tolerant to fire blight will become commercially accessible. Given that an infected scion has a lower probability of killing out the entire tree, the benefit of rootstock resistance should also be taken into account (Kellerhals et al. 2017). This work has uncovered the potential of utilizing fire blight disease-tolerant Cydomalus genotypes, which is widely used as rootstock worldwide. Furthermore, it emphasizes the significance of incorporating these genotypes as parents in rootstock breeding studies.
Data Availability
Data is available from the senior author upon request.
References
Abdollahi H, Ghasemi A, Mehrabipour S (2008) Evaluation of fire blight resistance in some quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) Genotypes. II. Resistance of genotypes to the disease. Seed Plant J 24:529–541. https://doi.org/10.22092/spij.2017.110836
Andreies N (2002) Achievements and prospectives in Pear breeding at the Fruit Research Station Voinesti, Romania. Acta Hortic 596:261–264. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.596.39
Barritt BH, Konishi BS, Dilley MA, Pusey L (2004) Resistance of apple rootstocks to fire blight caused by Erwinia amylovora. Acta Hort (ISHS) 658:387–390
Bell RL (2019) Genetics, genomics, and breeding for fire blight resistance in pear. In: The pear genome, pp 243–264
Bokszczanin KL, Przybyla AA, Schollenberger M, Gozdowski D, Madry W, Odziemkowski S (2012) Inheritance of fire blight resistance in Asian Pyrus species. Open J Genet 2(2):109
Burbank L (1955) Selected work. Foreign Literature, Moscow
Calenge F, Drouet D, Denancé C, Van de Weg WE, Brisset MN, Paulin JP, Durel CE (2005) Identification of a major QTL together with several minor additive or epistatic QTLs for resistance to fire blight in apple in two related progenies. Theor Appl Genet 111:128–135
De Paoli G, Subirà E, Battistini A (2002) In vitro rooting of Pyrodwarf and Cydomalus, two rootstocks for pear, under photoautotrophic conditions. Acta Hort 596:463–467
Emeriewen O, Richter K, Kilian A, Zini E, Hanke MV, Malnoy M, Peil A (2014) Identification of a major quantitative trait locus for resistance to fire blight in the wild apple species Malus fusca. Mol Breeding 34:407–419
Evrenosoğlu Y, Mertoğlu K, Acarsoy Bilgin N, Misirli A, Altay Y (2020) An analysis on some reciprocal Pear hybridization combinations in terms of transferring resistance to Fire Blight. Erwerbs-Obstbau 62(2)
Fischer TC, Malnoy M, Hofmann T et al (2014) F1 hybrid of cultivated apple (Malus x Domestica) and European pear (Pyrus communis) with fertile F2 offspring. Mol Breed 34:817–828
Gardner RG, Cummins JN, Aldwinckle HS (1980) Fire Blight resistance in the Geneva Apple Rootstock breeding Program1. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 105(6):907–912
Harshman JM, Evans KM, Allen H, Potts R, Flamenco J, Aldwinckle HS et al (2017) Fire blight resistance in wild accessions of Malus sieversii. Plant Dis 101(10):1738–1745
Inoue E, Sakuma F, Kasumi M et al (2003) Effect of high-temperature on suppression of the lethality exhibited in the intergeneric hybrid between Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) and apple (Malus × Domestica Borkh). Sci Hortic 98:385–396
Kamiri M, Stift M, Costantino G (2018) Preferential homologous chromosome pairing in a tetraploidi intergeneric somatic hybrid (Citrus reticulata + Poncirus trifoliata) revealed by molecular marker inheritance. Front Plant Sci 9:327
Kellerhals M, Schütz S, Patocchi A (2017) Breeding for host resistance to fire blight. J Plant Pathol, 37–43
Korba J, Šillerová J, Paprštein F, Sedlák J, Prokinová E et al (2013) Evaluation of susceptibility level of pear cultivars to fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in the Czech Republic. Hortic Sci 40:58–64. https://doi.org/10.17221/289/2012-HORTSCI
Korban SS, Ries SM, Morrisey JF, Hattermann D (1988) Inheritance of resistance to fire blight in Malus crosses. J Environ Hortic 6(1):22–24
Kostick SA, Teh SL, Norelli JL et al (2021) Fire blight QTL analysis in a multi-family apple population identifies a reduced-susceptibility allele in ‘Honeycrisp’. Hortic Res 8:28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00466-6
Layne REC, Quamme HA (1975) Pears. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University, West Lafayette, pp 38–70
Lecomte P, Cadic A (1992) Further results on shoot susceptibility of Cotoneaster to fire blight. In: VI International Workshop on Fire Blight, vol. 338. pp 407–412
Lespinasse Y, Aldwinckle HS (2000) Breeding for resistance to fire blight. In: Vanneste (ed) Fire blight: the disease and its causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. CABI Publishing, pp 253–273
Norelli JL, Aldwinckle HS, Holleran HT, Robinson TL, Johnson WC (2001), October Resistance of’Geneva’apple rootstocks to Erwinia amylovora when grown as potted plants and orchard trees. In: IX International Workshop on Fire Blight, vol. 590. pp 359–362
Ozrenk K, Balta F, Çelik F (2012) Levels of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) susceptibility of native apple, pear and quince germplasm from Lake Van Basin, Turkey. Eur J Plant Pathol 132:229–236
Pánková I, Krejzar V, Buchtová S, Krejzarová R (2023) Comparison of the shoot and blossom susceptibility of European and Asian pear cultivars to fire blight across different conditions. Plant Prot Sci, 59(1)
Pasqualetto G, Palmieri L, Martens S, Bus VG, Chagné D, Wiedow C, Gardiner SE (2023) Molecular characterization of intergeneric hybrids between Malus and Pyrus. Hortic Res 10(1):uhac239
Peil A, Emeriewen OF, Khan A et al (2021) Status of fire blight resistance breeding in Malus. J Plant Pathol 103(Suppl 1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-020-00581-8
Pompili V, Piazza S, Costa D, L., Malnoy M (2019) Application of Genome editing for improving disease resistance in apple: case of DIPM for resistance to fire blight. In: The 6th International Horticulture Research Conference, Venice, Italy, September 30th-October 5th, 2019. IT, p 42
Postman JD (2011) Intergeneric hybrids in Pyrinae (Maloideae) Subtribe of Pyreae in Family Rosaceae at USDA Genebank. Acta Hortic (ISHS) 918:937–943
Przybyla AA, Bokszczanin KL, Schollenberger M, Gozdowski D, Madry W, Odziemkowski S (2012) Fire blight resistance of pear genotypes from different European countries. Trees 26:191–197
Rudenko IS, Rotaru GI (1970) Morphological and anatomical characteristics of an inter generic apple x pear hybrid. Strukt Osob Sochni Myasnsi Plodov 5:40–51
Rudenko IS, Rudenko. II (1994) Genotypic variation in apple × quince progenies progress in temperate fruit breeding developments in plant breeding, vol. 1. pp 229–233
Ryabov IN (1970) Hybrids of cultivated apple with quince In: Proceedings Congr. Distant Hybr. Plants & Anim., 5–8 Febr., 1968 Moscow, vol. 2. Kolos Publishers, Moscow, pp. 49–54
Şahin M (2017) Determination of fire blight disease susceptibilty and selection breeding on quince genotypes. PhD Thesis, Ege University (in Turkish)
Şahin M, Mısırlı A (2016) Ülkemizde ve dünyada ayva ıslahı çalışmaları. Nevşehir Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 286–294. https://doi.org/10.17100/nevbiltek.211008
Şahin M, Gökkür S, Çavdar A, Aksoy D, Şafak C, Mısırlı A, Özaktan H (2019a) Fire Blight Tolerant Quince Breeding. Project no: TAGEM/BBAD/16/A08/P03/04
Şahin M, Mısırlı A, Özaktan H (2019b) Ege ve Doğu Marmara Bölgesi ayva plantasyonlarında ateş yanıklığı hastalığının değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 29(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.568756
Şahin M, Mısırlı A, Özaktan H (2020a) Determination of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) susceptibility in Turkey’s Cydonia oblonga Mill. Germplasm. Eur J Plant Pathol 157:227–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-020-01971-5
Şahin M, Mısırlı A, Gökkür S, Aksoy D, Özaktan H (2020b) Application of hybridization breeding technique for fire blight resistance on Cydonia oblonga: a base study on susceptibility, heterosis, and Heterobeltiosis parameters. Int J Fruit Sci 20(sup3):S1
Sobiczewski P, Peil A, Mikiciński A, Richter K, Lewandowski M, Żurawicz E, Kellerhals M (2015) Susceptibility of apple genotypes from European genetic resources to fire blight (Erwinia amylovora). Eur J Plant Pathol 141(1):51–62
Trabut L (1916) Pyronia: a hybrid between the pear and quince. J Hered 7:416–419
Van der Zwet T, Oitto WA, Westwood MN (1974) Variability in degree of fire blight resistance within and between Pyrus species, interspecific hybrids, and seedling progenies. Euphytica 23(2):295–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035871
Wertheim SJ (2002) Rootstocks for European pear: a review. Acta Hort 596:299–309
Acknowledgements
The author would like to gratefully acknowledge the kind support of Prof. Dr. Hatice ÖZAKTAN for preparation of fire blight isolates and Salih GÖKKÜR for helping in the greenhouse.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Şahin, M. Determination of tolerance to Erwinia amylovora of intergeneric hybrid genus: Cydomalus. J Plant Pathol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-024-01692-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-024-01692-2