Abstract
We suggest that theoretical models in the social sciences would benefit from uses of nature’s images that map the complexity of the phenomena to be investigated. Such abstractions would better maintain the open-systemic character of the psychological and social phenomena in all their complexities. Particularly central in such complexities are dynamic catalytic processes that are operating in wholistic fields of psychological systems such as self, identity, and values Theoretical models taken from the mechanical realms of computational processes fail to capture these constantly changing and often nebulous fields. In particular, we analyze the promises of two abstract forms based on nature—spiral and helix—as providing temporal structure for understanding basic higher psychological functions, using the dialogical self theory as an example. The focus of that theory on dialogicality between I-positions in their transition through ruptures of the whole system is best fitted with nonlinear field-dependent models. For all systems of complex dynamic wholes kind, theoretical field models emulating various biocynotic systems (“meadow,” “mychorrea,” etc.) would constitute a new direction in theoretical advancement in the human sciences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Interestingly, the branch uniting the spiral outgrowths that was characteristic of Ancient Greek and Roman ornaments disappeared in Byzantine versions of ornamenting practices. The psychological significance of such ever-present patterns indicates the curvilinear nature of human internal affective processes (Valsiner, 2018).
“Blühende Natur” describable as plants, animals, waters, and rocks. Which means all-natural complex that is part of the earth's surface.
“Unbelebte Natur” definable as everything, from physical and chemical forces to biological organism, that exists or develops in organic and inorganic phenomena without human intervention.
References
Acerbi, F. (2013). Aristotle and Euclid’s postulates. The Classical Quarterly, 63(2), 680–685.
Bang, J., & Winther-Lindqvist, D. (Eds.). (2016). Nothingness. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Beloussov, L. (1998). The dynamic architecture of a developing organism. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cabell, K. R., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.) (2014). The catalyzing mind: Beyond models of causality. Vol, 11 of Advances of Theoretical Psychology. New York: Springer.
Campbell, J. (2002). The flight of the wild gander. (p. 117, Illustrated, Reprint (Revised). Novato, CA: New World Library.
Campill, M. A. (2021). Towards a Wholistic Model of Identity: why Not a Meadow? Integrative psychological and Behavioral Science., 55(1), 112–127.
Campill, M. A. and von Fircks, E, (in preparation). The pluralistic-self. To be submitted to Journal of Constructivist Research.
Cavallaro, D. (2015). The art of Studio Gainax: experimentation, style and innovation at the leading edge of anime. McFarland.
Dazai, O. (1958). No longer human (Vol. 357). New Directions Publishing.
Deutsch, M. (1954). Field theory in social psychology. Handbook of social psychology, 1, 181–222.
Dunlap, R. A. (1997). The golden ratio and Fibonacci numbers. World Scientific.
Engeström, Y. (2006). Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. Building activity theory in practice: Toward the next generation, 1, 1–43.
Fleckenstein, J. O. (1975). 8.2. Kepler and Neoplatonism. Vistas in Astronomy, 18, 427–438.
Fujisawa, C. (1959). Zen and Shinto (p. 92). The Story of Japanese Philosophy. New York: Philosophical Library.
Harcourt, H. M. (2019). The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition: Fiftieth Anniversary Printing. London: Dover.
Harvey, D. C. (2003). ‘National’ identities and the politics of ancient heritage: continuity and change at ancient monuments in Britain and Ireland, c. 1675–1850. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(4), 473–487.
Heinich, N. (1997). The glory of Van Gogh: An anthropology of admiration. Princeton University Press.
Hermans, H. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural -. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281.
Ingold, T. (2016). Lines. London: Routledge.
Lamiell, J. (1998). Nomothetic’ and ‘idiographic’: Contrasting Windelband’s understanding with contemporary usage. Theory & Psychology, 8, 23–38.
Lewin, K. (1930–1931). Der Übergang von der aristotelischen zur galileischen Denkweise in Biologie und Psychologie. Erkenntnis, 1, . 421–466.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. Durham: Duke University Press.
Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mittelstraß, J. (Ed.). (2016). Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie: Bd. 5: Log–N. Springer-Verlag.
Nir, D. (2012). Voicing inner conflict: From a dialogical to a negotiational self. In H. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 284–300). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Popov, A., & Iacob, A. (2014). Lobachevsky geometry and modern nonlinear problems. Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
Puche Navarro, R. (Ed.). (2009). Es la mente no lineal? Cali: Programa editorial Universidad del Valle.
Rayner, A. (2017). The origin of life patterns in the natural inclusion of space in flux. Cham, CH: Springer.
Taioli, S., Gabbrielli, R., Simonucci, S., Pugno, N. M., & Iorio, A. (2016). Lobachevsky crystallography made real through carbon pseudospheres. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 28(13), 13LT01
Thompson, D’A. . (1917). On growth and form. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishers.
Tsuda, I. (2001). Toward an interpretation of dynamic neutral activity in terms of chaotic dynamical systems. Behvioral and Brain Science, 24, 793–847.
Valsiner, J. (2005). Attractors, repulsors, and directors: making Dynamic Systems Theory developmental. Annual Report 2003–2004 of Research and Clinical Center for Child Development, Graduate School of Education, Hokkaido University. Sapporo, No., 27, 13–35.
Valsiner, J. (2018). Ornamented lives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Valsiner, J. (2019). From causality to catalysis in the social sciences. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Social philosophy of science for the social sciences (pp. 125–146). New York: Springer.
Valsiner, J. (2020). Sensuality in human living: The cultural psychology of affect. Cham, CH: Springer Nature (Springer Briefs- Theoretical Advances in Psychology). ISBN 978–3–030–41742–0
Vogel, H. (1979). A better way to construct the sunflower head. Mathematical biosciences, 44(3–4), 179–189.
Wilson, C. (2000). From Kepler to Newton: Telling the tale. The Foundations of Newtonian Scholarship, 223–242.
Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Symbolic resources in development. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Acknowledgements
We want to acknowledge the second author’s laptop that made the development of the dialectical ideas in this article so solid and did not let us down.
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research and publication of this article, it stands on its own as a virginal creative act that is often the case in contemporary academia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This study does not contain any studies with human participants or animals by the authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campill, M.A., Valsiner, J. Spiral and Helical Models for Psychology: Leaving Linearity Behind. Hu Arenas 6, 102–122 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00194-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00194-2