Abstract
Today, many educational reforms emphasize the importance of formative assessment (FA) for effectiveness in teaching. Considering the importance of FA in education and a perceived lack of same, it is clear that much more research is needed on this subject. However, it is also very important for researchers to formulate new studies and not to repeat exiting ones, and to increase the visibility of exiting effective studies that can make teachers in service understand the importance of FA. In this context, being able to review qualified academic research is very valuable. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis using the VOSviewer to determine the focus of research on formative assessment in education (FAE). This bibliometric analysis included 447 studies on FA published in the Web of Science (WoS) from 2000 to 2021. We performed the citation analysis, created a co-authored network map, and performed an analysis of author keywords in FA publications. Results showed that Erin M. Furtak has been the most prolific author in FAE in terms of the number of publications. Moreover, David J. Nicol and Debra Macfarlane-Dick, who had a co-authored publication, were the most influential authors in terms of citations. Results indicated that Univ Colorado/USA with 13 publications was the most productive institution. However, the USA and England were the most productive countries in terms of both numbers of publications and citations. Of the 19 documents with over a hundred citations, Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick (2006) and Black and Wiliam (2009) were the most influential documents. According to the number of publications and citations, “Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education” and “Computers & Education” came to the fore among the top five most productive sources. The results of the co-occurrence analysis showed that the terms “assessment,” “mathematics,” and “professional development” were most often co-occurrence. Moreover, FA, which was the focus of this bibliometric analysis, had a high degree of co-occurrence with feedback, followed by summative evaluation, self-regulation, and professional development. These results will contribute significantly to the efforts of the scientific community towards FA research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/summary/506d2eeb-9361-4460-8bf3-2a2bd56ed309-720760d4/date-descending/1.
References
Antoniou, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9188-4
Badaluddin, N. A., Lion, M., Razali, S. M., & Khalit, S. I. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of global trends on soil moisture assessment using the remote sensing research study from 2000 to 2020. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 232(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05218-9
Beatty, I. D., & Gerace, W. J. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9140-4
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v7i1.430
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Birenbaum, M., DeLuca, C., Earl, L., Heritage, M., Klenowski, V., Looney, A., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/147821031456673
Bjork, S., Offer, A., & Söderberg, G. (2014). Time series citation data: The Nobel Prize in economics. Scientometrics, 98(1), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0989-5
Black, P. (2015). Formative assessment–an optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). ‘In praise of educational research’: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000133721
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Bozkurt, N. O. (2021). Academics’ opinions regarding the quality of scientific publications and their quality problems. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 11(1), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2021.435
Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00132.x
Cagasan, L., Care, E., Robertson, P., & Luo, R. (2020). Developing a formative assessment protocol to examine formative assessment practices in the Philippines. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766960
Cancino, C., Merigó, J. M., Coronado, F., Dessouky, Y., & Dessouky, M. (2017). Forty years of Computers & Industrial Engineering: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.033
Cao, Y., Qi, F., Cui, H., & Yuan, M. (2022). Knowledge domain and emerging trends of carbon footprint in the field of climate change and energy use: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24756-1
Cisterna, D., & Gotwals, A. W. (2018). Enactment of ongoing formative assessment: Challenges and opportunities for professional development and practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(3), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1432227
Cizek, G. J., Andrade, H. L., & Bennett, R. E. (2019). Formative assessment: History, definition, and progress. In Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 3–19). Routledge.
Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20440
Correia, C. F., & Harrison, C. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1634040
Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993026
De Backer, F., Van Avermaet, P., & Slembrouck, S. (2017). Schools as laboratories for exploring multilingual assessment policies and practices. Language and Education, 31(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1261896
DeLuca, C. (2012). Preparing teachers for the age of accountability: Toward a framework for assessment education. Action in Teacher Education, 34(5–6), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2012.730347
DeLuca, C., Valiquette, A., Coombs, A., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2018). Teachers’ approaches to classroom assessment: A large-scale survey. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1244514
Dini, V., Sevian, H., Caushi, K., & Orduña Picón, R. (2020). Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers. Science Education, 104(2), 290–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21559
Đorić, B., Lambić, D., & Jovanović, Ž. (2021). The use of different simulations and different types of feedback and students’ academic performance in physics. Research in Science Education, 51(5), 1437–1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9858-4
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2015). Influence of omitted citations on the bibliometric statistics of the major Manufacturing journals. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1083–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1583-9
Furtak, E. M., Circi, R., & Heredia, S. C. (2018). Exploring alignment among learning progressions, teacher-designed formative assessment tasks, and student growth: Results of a four-year study. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408624
Furtak, E. M., & Heredia, S. C. (2014). Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 982–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21156
Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R. K., Swanson, R., de León, V., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. C. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: Findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44(3), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3
Furtak, E. M., Morrison, D. L., & Kroog, H. (2014). Investigating the link between learning progressions and classroom assessment. Science Education, 98(4), 640–673.
Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006). Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: Can formative assessment make a difference? Educational Studies, 32(4), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690600850354
Giménez-Espert, M. D. C., & Prado-Gascó, V. J. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of six nursing journals from the Web of Science, 2012–2017. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(3), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13868
Gomez, C. J., Herman, A. C., & Parigi, P. (2022). Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 919–929. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01351-5
Gotwals, A. W. (2018). Where are we now? Learning progressions and formative assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408626
Grob, R., Holmeier, M., & Labudde, P. (2021). Analysing formal formative assessment activities in the context of inquiry at primary and upper secondary school in Switzerland. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1663453
Guo, W. Y., & Yan, Z. (2019). Formative and summative assessment in Hong Kong primary schools: Students’ attitudes matter. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(6), 675–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571993
Hartmeyer, R., Stevenson, M. P., & Bentsen, P. (2018). A systematic review of concept mapping-based formative assessment processes in primary and secondary science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 598–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1377685
Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
Heredia, S. C., Furtak, E. M., Morrison, D., & Renga, I. P. (2016). Science teachers’ representations of classroom practice in the process of formative assessment design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(7), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9482-3
Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140–145.
Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
Hondrich, A. L., Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & Klieme, E. (2016). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(3), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1049113
Hopster-den Otter, D., Wools, S., Eggen, T. J., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2017). Formative use of test results: A user’s perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 52, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.002
Hou, J., Yang, X., & Chen, C. (2018). Emerging trends and new developments in information science: A document co-citation analysis (2009–2016). Scientometrics, 115(2), 869–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2695-9
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002
Irons, A., & Elkington, S. (2021). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138610514
James, M. (2006). Assessment, teaching and theories of learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 47–60). Sage.
Kasemodel, M. G. C., Makishi, F., Souza, R. C., & Silva, V. L. (2016). Following the trail of crumbs: A bibliometric study on consumer behavior in the Food Science and Technology field. International Journal of Food Studies, 5(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/5.1.2016.a7
Kelley, K., Clark, B., Brown, V., & Sitzia, J. (2003). Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg031
Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319646
Kwon, S. K., Lee, M., & Shin, D. (2017). Educational assessment in the Republic of Korea: Lights and shadows of high-stake exam-based education system. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1074540
Lee, H., Chung, H. Q., Zhang, Y., Abedi, J., & Warschauer, M. (2020). The effectiveness and features of formative assessment in US K-12 education: A systematic review. Applied Measurement in Education, 33(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1732383
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325.
Mapplebeck, A., & Dunlop, L. (2021). Oral interactions in secondary science classrooms: A grounded approach to identifying oral feedback types and practices. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 957–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9843-y
Marshall, B., & Jane Drummond, M. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(02), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520600615638
McMillan, J. H., Venable, J. C., & Varier, D. (2013). Studies of the Effect of Formative Assessment on Student Achievement: So Much More Is Needed. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7275/tmwm-7792
Milfont, T. L., & Page, E. (2013). A bibliometric review of the first thirty years of the Journal of Environmental Psychology. Psyecology, 4(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2013.10773866
National Research Council. (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Pan, W., Jian, L., & Liu, T. (2019). Grey system theory trends from 1991 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis and visualization. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1407–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03256-z
Petrović, J., Pale, P., & Jeren, B. (2017). Online formative assessments in a digital signal processing course: Effects of feedback type and content difficulty on students learning achievements. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 3047–3061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9571-0
Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701476386
Radhakrishnan, S., Erbis, S., Isaacs, J. A., & Kamarthi, S. (2017). Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature. PloS one, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172778
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20163
Rushton, A. (2005). Formative assessment: A key to deep learning? Medical Teacher, 27(6), 509–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500129159
Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104
Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.
Sudakova, N. E., Savina, T. N., Masalimova, A. R., Mikhaylovsky, M. N., Karandeeva, L. G., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2022). Online formative assessment in higher education: Bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 12(3), 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030209
Tanner, W., Akbas, E., & Hasan, M. (2019, December). Paper recommendation based on citation relation. In 2019 IEEE international conference on big data (big data) (pp. 3053–3059). IEEE.
Taras, M. (2005). Assessment–summative and formative–some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x
Tierney, R. D. (2014). Fairness as a multifaceted quality in classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.003
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095780
Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., & Demetriadis, S. (2003). The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers & Education, 41(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00031-9
Van der Kleij, F. M. (2019). Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.010
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2012). VOSviewermanual. Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.5.2. Available at: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.5.2.pdf (accessed 25 January 2023).
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285–320). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. J., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257–280.
Vickerman, P. (2009). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955986
Webb, M. (2014). Beginning teacher education and collaborative formative e-assessment. In Approaches to assessment that enhance learning in higher education (pp. 117–138). Routledge.
Weurlander, M., Söderberg, M., Scheja, M., Hult, H., & Wernerson, A. (2012). Exploring formative assessment as a tool for learning: Students’ experiences of different methods of formative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.572153
Wiliam, D. (2013). Assessment: The bridge between teaching and learning. Voices from the Middle, 21(2), 15–20.
Wilkie, B., & Liefeith, A. (2022). Student experiences of live synchronised video feedback in formative assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1725879
Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2020). Developing a formative assessment protocol to support professional growth. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956
Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students’ self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004
Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2015). Primary teachers’ attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.002
Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023967026413
Ysenbaert, J., Van Houtte, M., & Van Avermaet, P. (2020). Assessment policies and practices in contexts of diversity: Unravelling the tensions. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09319-7
Zeng, R., & Chini, A. (2017). A review of research on embodied energy of buildings using bibliometric analysis. Energy and Buildings, 155, 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.025
Zhang, Y., & Wang, P. (2022). Twenty years’ development of teacher identity research: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783913
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Karaçöp, A., İnaltekin, T. Formative Assessment in Educational Research Published at the Beginning of the New Millennium: Bibliometric Analysis. J Form Des Learn 7, 106–125 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00081-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00081-9