Skip to main content
Log in

From politicizing and dereligionizing religion to religionizing and depoliticizing politics. Reflecting on ‘Islam’ 20 years after 9/11

  • Artikel
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

‘Islam has bloody borders.’ Samuel P. Huntington (1993)

‘I think Islam hates us.’ Donald J. Trump (Schleifer, 2016)

Abstract

This article begins with a discussion of the notion of ‘Islam’ as used in the post-9/11 era. Rather than assuming that there is one specific notion of religion, the author problematizes the relationship between religion and politics in the aftermath of 9/11. From the perspectives of Islamophobia studies and international relations studies, the article looks specifically at how Islam was given an agency of its own, which also created a fertile ground for reframing the religion of Islam as being not a religion, but a political ideology, thus operating, unlike other religions, primarily in the field of politics. The article discusses the theory of the clash of civilizations as presented by political scientist Samuel P. Huntington against the backdrop of succeeding policies, such as the proclamations of the War on Terror by President George Bush related to the ideological void that was left after the fall of the Soviet Union, which ultimately marked the entrance into a new era in the making of global politics. The author argues that the increasing debates about Islam following the violent attacks on 9/11 led to a religionizing of political events that subsequently dereligionized religion and depoliticized the notion of politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In fact, the British orientalist Bernard Lewis had presented the “clash of civilizations” argument as early as in 1957 during a speech at Johns Hopkins University.

  2. Decolonial thinkers such as Salman Sayyid are concerned with the attempt to give the Muslim subject a name in the world and not to leave them speechless and at the mercy of postcolonial relations, orientalist patterns of thought, and positivist epistemology. In this context, Sayyid sees Islamophobia as an attempt to prevent the Muslim subject from being given a place in the world as a Muslim (Sayyid 2014). To name this space (beyond the debate about Islamophobia in particular), the decolonial theorist Nelson Maldonado-Torres proposed a way to achieve decolonial epistemic disobedience in his ten theses, which frame the decolonial project in such a way that an individual subject will emerge as: a ‘questioner, thinker, theorist, writer, and communicator’; a creator involved in an aesthetic, erotic, and spiritual decolonial turn; an agent of social change; and, lastly, an actor in a collective (Maldonado-Torres 2016, pp. 24–28).

References

  • Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, Sahar. 2021. The racial Muslim: when racism quashes religious freedom. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakali, Naved, and Farid Hafez. 2022. The rise of global Islamophobia in the war on terror: coloniality, race, and Islam. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, Sindre. 2014. Anders Breivik and the rise of islamophobia. London: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, Asef. 2007. Islam and democracy: what is the real question? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bayraklı, Enes, and Farid Hafez (eds.). 2022. European Islamophobia Report. Vienna: Leopold Weiss Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, José. 2021. 9/11, Twenty Years Later: Personal Reflections, September 8, 2021, Georgetown University, Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs. https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/responses/9-11-twenty-years-later-personal-reflections. Accessed 1 Nov 2022.

  • Cesari, Jocelyne. 2021. From 9/11 to COVID-19: Lessons Learned on Religion and Politics, September 8, 2021, Georgetown University, Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs. https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/responses/from-9-11-to-covid-19-lessons-learned-on-religion-and-politics. Accessed 1 Nov 2022.

  • Daulatzai, Sohail, and Junaid Rana (eds.). 2018. With stones in our hands: writings on muslims, racism, and empire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Jonathan, and Nukhet Sandal. 2016. Integrating religion into international relations theory. In Routledge handbook of religion and politics, ed. Jeffrey Haynes, 270–283. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Jonathan, and Shmuel Sandier. 2004. The clash of civilizations debate. In Bringing religion into international relations, ed. Jonathan Fox, Shmuel Sandler, and Shmuel Sandier, 115–135. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gardell, Mattias. 2014. Crusader dreams: Oslo 22/7, Islamophobia, and the quest for a monocultural Europe. Terrorism and Political Violence 26(1):129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garraio, Júlia. 2021. Cologne and the (un) making of transnational approaches to sexual violence. European Journal of Women’s Studies 28(2):129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, Ramon. 2006. World-systems analysis in the context of transmodernity, border thinking, and global coloniality. Review 19(2):167–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, Ramon. 2016. What is Racism? Journal of World-Systems Research 22(1):9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, Farid. 2014. Shifting borders: Islamophobia as the cornerstone for building pan-European right-wing unity. Patterns of Prejudice 48(5):479–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, Farid. 2018. Schools of thought in Islamophobia studies: prejudice, racism, and decoloniality. Islamophobia Studies Journal 4(2):210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, Farid. 2022. Criminalizing Muslim agency in Europe. The case of ‘political islam’ in Austria, Germany, and France. French Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/09571558221133253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, Shadi, William McCants, and Rashid Dar. 2017. Islamism after the Arab spring: between the islamic state and the nation-state. The Brookings Project on US Relations with the Islamic World-US-Islamic World Forum Papers 2015. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Victoria S. 2008. Narrative, postmodernity and the problem of “religious illiteracy. New Blackfriars 89(1023):591–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Jeffrey. 2019. From huntington to Trump: thirty years of the clash of civilizations. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Jeffrey. 2022. The Routledge handbook of religion, politics and ideology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2009. Discrimination in the name of neutrality. 26 Feb 2009. https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/02/26/discrimination-name-neutrality/headscarf-bans-teachers-and-civil-servants-germany. Accessed 1 Nov 2022.

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs 72(3):22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 2004. Who are we? The challenges to America’s national identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itaoui, Rhonda, and Elsadig Elsheikh. 2018. Islamophobia in the United States: a reading resource pack, research lit review, Haas institute for a fair and inclusive society. https://belonging.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/islamophobia_reading_pack_publish.pdf (Created 09.2018). Accessed 1 Nov 2022.

  • Kakutani, Michiko. 2007. Of the words of war and the war of ideas. NYT. October 26. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/26/books/26Book.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2022.

  • Khan, Muqtedar. 2012. Three dimensions of the emerging political philosophy of Islam. In Routledge handbook of political islam, ed. Shahram Akbarzadeh, 43–50. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, Armin. 2020. Judaism is not a religion, but a political organization: German jews under suspicion in the age of enlightenment and parallels to contemporary Islamophobic discourses. In Special Issue: Muslims under general suspicion: perspectives on the prevention of so-called Islamist extremism Islamophobia Studies Yearbook, Vol. 11, ed. Farid Hafez, Sinyan Qasem, 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. 2016. Outline of ten theses on coloniality and decoloniality. http://frantzfanonfoundation-fondationfrantzfanon.com/IMG/pdf/maldonado-torres_outline_of_ten_theses-10.23.16_.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2022. 24–28.

  • Mamdani, Mahmood. 2005. Good muslim, bad muslim: America, the cold war, and the roots of terror. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandaville, Peter. 2007. Global political Islam. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Debra L. 2021. Religious literacy in news. Religion & Education 48(1):74–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinty Mansson, Anna. 2012. The “mainstream Muslim” opposing Islamophobia: self-representations of American Muslims. Environment and Planning 44(12):2957–2973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter D. 2009. Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society 26(7–8):159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Diane L. 2014. Overcoming religious illiteracy: Expanding the boundaries of religious education. Religious Education 109(4):379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, Raoul, and James Baldwin. 2017. I am not your Negro. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, Della Donatella, and Mario Diani (eds.). 2015. The oxford handbook of social movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, Junaid. 2016. The Racial Infrastructure of the Terror-Industrial Complex. Social Text 34(4(129)):111–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1920. The practice and theory of bolshevism. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Ben. 2022. Christianism. In The Routledge handbook of religion, politics and ideology, ed. Jeffrey Haynes, 211–226. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1995. Anti-Semite and Jew. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayyid, Salman. 2014. Recalling the caliphate: decolonisation and world order. London: Hurst and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayyid, Salman. 2017. Political Islam in the aftermath of “islamic state”. ReOrient 3(1):65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleifer, Theodore. 2016. Donald Trump: “I think Islam hates us.” CNN. March 10, 2016. https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/09/politics/donald-trump-islam-hates-us/index.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2022.

  • Schmiedel, Ulrich. 2021a. Terror und Theologie. Der religionstheoretische Diskurs der 9/11-Dekade. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedel, Ulrich. 2021b. The cracks in the category of Christianism: a call for ambiguity in the conceptualization of Christianity. In Contemporary Christian-cultural values: migration encounters in the nordic region, ed. Cecilia Nahnfeldt, Kaia S. Rønsdal, 165–182. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, Reinhard. 2012. Islamofascism: Four Avenues to the Use of an Epithet. Die Welt des Islams 52(3–4):290–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehi, Stephen. 2010. Islamophobia: the ideological campaign against Muslims. Atlanta: Clarity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, Paul A. 2018. Postcolonial France: race, Islam, and the future of the republic. London: Pluto.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian. 2017. Religion. What it is, how it works, and why it matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Terry. 2020. Whitelash: unmasking white grievance at the ballot box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strømmen, Hannah, and Ulrich Schmiedel. 2020. The claim to christianity: responding to the far right. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunier, Thijl. 2014. Domesticating Islam: exploring academic knowledge production on Islam and Muslims in European societies. Ethnic and Racial Studies 37(6):1138–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrekens, Corinne, and Dirk Jacobs. 2016. Muslims’ religiosity and views on religion in six Western European countries: does national context matter? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42(2):325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. World-systems analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, Stefan. 2012. Islamofascism? Introduction. Die Welt des Islams 52(3–4):225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farid Hafez.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature oder sein Lizenzgeber (z.B. eine Gesellschaft oder ein*e andere*r Vertragspartner*in) hält die ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechte an diesem Artikel kraft eines Verlagsvertrags mit dem/den Autor*in(nen) oder anderen Rechteinhaber*in(nen); die Selbstarchivierung der akzeptierten Manuskriptversion dieses Artikels durch Autor*in(nen) unterliegt ausschließlich den Bedingungen dieses Verlagsvertrags und dem geltenden Recht.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hafez, F. From politicizing and dereligionizing religion to religionizing and depoliticizing politics. Reflecting on ‘Islam’ 20 years after 9/11. Z Religion Ges Polit 7, 697–710 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-023-00154-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-023-00154-3

Keywords

Navigation