From Quantum Axiomatics to Quantum Conceptuality
Since its inception, many physicists have seen in quantum mechanics the possibility, if not the necessity, of bringing cognitive aspects into the play, which were instead absent, or unnoticed, in the previous classical theories. In this article, we outline the path that led us to support the hypothesis that our physical reality is fundamentally conceptual-like and cognitivistic-like. However, contrary to the “abstract ego hypothesis” introduced by John von Neumann and further explored, in more recent times, by Henry Stapp, our approach does not rely on the measurement problem as expressing a possible “gap in physical causation,” which would point to a reality lying beyond the mind-matter distinction. On the contrary, in our approach, the measurement problem is considered to be essentially solved, at least for what concerns the origin of quantum probabilities, which we have reasons to believe they would be epistemic. Our conclusion that conceptuality and cognition would be an integral part of all physical processes comes instead from the observation of the striking similarities between the non-spatial behavior of the quantum micro-physical entities and that of the human concepts. This gave birth to a new interpretation of quantum mechanics, called the “conceptuality interpretation,” currently under investigation within our group in Brussels.
KeywordsQuantum theory Conceptuality interpretation Quantum cognition Extended Bloch representation Quantum structures Quantum probabilities Non-spatiality
- Aerts, D. (1984). The missing elements of reality in the description of quantum mechanics of the EPR paradox situation. Helvetica Physica Acta, 57, 421–428.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D. (1998). The entity and modern physics: the creation discovery view of reality. In E. Castellani (Ed.) , Interpreting bodies: classical and quantum objects in modern physics (pp. 223–257). Princeton: Princeton Unversity Press.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D. (1999b). The stuff the world is made of: physics and reality. In D. Aerts, J. Broekaert, E. Mathijs (Eds.) , Einstein meets Magritte: an interdisciplinary reflection (pp. 129–183). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D. (2010b). A potentiality and conceptuality interpretation of quantum physics. Philosophica, 83, 15–52.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D. (2013). La mecánica cuántica y la conceptualidad: Sobre materia, historias, semántica y espacio-tiempo. Scientiae Studia, 11, 75–100. Translated from: Aerts, D. (2011). Quantum theory and conceptuality: matter, stories, semantics and space-time. arXiv:1110.4766 [quant-ph].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2017a). Quantum measurements as weighted symmetry breaking processes: the hidden measurement perspective. International Journal of Quantum Foundations, 3, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2018a). The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics for infinite-dimensional entities. arXiv:1704.06249 [quant-ph].
- Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2018b). Quantum perspectives on evolution. In S. Wuppuluri, & F.A. Doria (Eds.) , The map and the territory: exploring the foundations of science, thought and reality (pp. 571–595): Springer: The Frontiers collection.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D., & Sozzo, S. (2015). What is quantum? Unifying its micro-physical and structural appearance. In H. Atmanspacher, et al. (Ed.) , Quantum interaction. QI 2014, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 8951 pp. 12–23). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D., Aerts, S., Coecke, B., D’Hooghe, B., Durt, T., Valckenborgh, F. (1997a). A model with varying fluctuations in the measurement context. In M. Ferrero, & A. van der Merwe (Eds.) , New developments on fundamental problems in quantum physics (pp. 7–9). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D., Coecke, B., Durt, T., Valckenborgh, F. (1997b). Quantum, classical and intermediate I: a model on the Poincaré sphere. Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, 10, 225.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D., Coecke, B., Smets, S. (1999b). On the origin of probabilities in quantum mechanics: creative and contextual aspects. In G. Cornelis, S. Smets, J.P. Van Bendegem (Eds.) , Metadebates on science (pp. 291–302). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D., Sassoli de Bianchi, M., Sozzo, S., Veloz, M. (2018a). On the conceptuality interpretation of quantum and relativity theories. Foundations of Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-9557-z.
- Aerts, D., Sassoli de Bianchi, M., Sozzo, S, Veloz, T. (2018). Quantum cognition goes beyond-quantum: modeling the collective participant in psychological measurements. arXiv:1802.10448 [q-bio.NC].
- Foulis, D. J., & Randall, C. H. (1978). Manuals, morphisms and quantum mechanics. In A.R. Marlow (Ed.) , Mathematical foundations of quantum theory (pp. 105–126). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Gleason, A. M. (1957). Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 6, 885–893.Google Scholar
- Jauch, J. M. (1968). Foundations of quantum mechanics. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Jauch, J. M., & Piron, C. (1963). Can hidden variables be excluded in quantum mechanics? Helvetica Physica Acta, 36, 827–837.Google Scholar
- Kochen, S., & Specker, E. P. (1967). The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59–87.Google Scholar
- Ludwig, G. (1983). Foundations of quantum mechanics I, texts & monographs in physics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Mackey, G. (1963). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. W. A. Benjamin: Reading.Google Scholar
- Piron, C. (1976). Foundations of quantum physics. W. A. Benjamin: Reading.Google Scholar
- Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2013b). Using simple elastic bands to explain quantum mechanics: a conceptual review of two of Aerts’ machine-models. Central European Journal of Physics, 11, 147–161.Google Scholar
- Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2018). On Aerts’ overlooked solution to the EPR paradox. arXiv:1805.02869 [quant-ph].
- Von Neumann, J. (1932). Grundlehren, Math. Wiss. XXXVIII.Google Scholar