Abstract
A summary of a philosophical (ontological) system of consistent relativism based on the postulate of relativity of existence of all things in existence is proposed. Absolutely everything exists, but, at the same time, no existence is absolute. Anything is possible, but only those entities we interact with one way or another exist for us, i.e., reality is interaction, “I interact—hence, I exist”. For all of us, information, or perceptible heterogeneities, is real. There exists an infinity of different realities. The different levels of entities’ existence, in particular, of the Life and the Mind, should be taken into consideration. The existence of live systems in relation to non-living entities is undetermined, thus the alive can appear in its specifically live properties only through interaction with living things: there’s no difference between alive and dead for the stones. An even greater range of levels of existence can be brought about through interaction—that is the core idea of Gödel’s theorem. As a result, the range of forms of existence tends towards infinity—the evolution of matter through the Overmind will bring us up to God. This ontological position assumes a series of non-trivial physical conclusions, which can be tested experimentally, including the use of mathematical models. Rotation could be used to increase inertial mass and decrease gravitational mass, slowing down time. A more generalized mathematical model of the physical world, including a universal operator of the co-existence of objects, can be developed. In this model of Reality, superluminal speeds (without interaction) are possible and the Universe is open.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby WR (1957) An introduction to cybernetics. L.: Chapman and Hall Ltd
Berkley G (1953) The treatise on the principles of human knowledge, 1.3
Bertalanffy L von (1969) Obshchaya teoriya sistem—obzor problem i rezul'tatov//Sistemnyye issledovaniya: Yezhegodnik [The general theory of systems—a review of problems and results. System Studies: Yearbook]. Nauka, Moscow
Bogdanov AT (1989) Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka: v 2 kn. [Tectology. General organizational science: in 2 books]. Book 1. Moskow: Ekonomika
Descartes R (1991). Discourse on the method of rightly conducting one's reason and of seeking truth in the sciences, Ch. 3
Dirak PAM (1984) The requirements of fundamental physical theory. Eur J Phys 5:65–67
Everett H III (1983) The many–worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Feynman RP (1965) The development of quantum electrodynamics in the spatio-temporal aspect. Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1965. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1965/feynman/lecture/
Glushkov V (1964) O kibernetike kak nauke // Kibernetika, myshleniye, zhizn' [On cybernetics as a science // Cybernetics, thinking, life]. Mysl', Moskow
Mostepanenko AM (1987) Problema sushchestvovaniya v fizike i kosmologii: mirovozzrencheskiye i metodologicheskiye aspekty [The Problem of Existence in Physics and Cosmology: Worldview and Methodological Aspects]. Leningrad: Leningrad State University Publishing House, p. 7, 26, 13
Nikolay K (1984) O vozmozhnosti-bytii [Nicholas of Cusa. About Possibility-Being]. Nikolay Kuzanskiy. Soch. v dvukh tomakh. T. 2.—S. 135–182
Nietzsche F (1990) Genealogy of morality. First treatise: 'Good and Evil', 'Good and Bad'.
Novikov ID (1978) Equivalence, the principle. In: Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd edn, vol 29, p 587
Rozhanskiy I (1983) Anaxagor. Mysl', Moskow
Schmutzer E (1981) Teoriya otnositel'nosti—sovremennoye predstavleniye. Put' k yedinstvu fiziki [Theory of relativity—a modern view. The path to the unity of physics]. Mir, Moskow
Ursul A (1968) Priroda informatsii: filosofskiy ocherk [The nature of information: a philosophical essay]. Izd-vo politicheskoy literatury, Moskow
Wayte R (2007) The phenomenon of weight-reduction of a spinning wheel. Meccanica 42(4):359–364
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rassokha, I.M. Relativism as an Ontological System. Axiomathes 32, 1433–1449 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09589-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09589-w