References
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2017). NAPLAN achievement in reading, writing, language conventions and numeracy: National report for 2017. https://www.nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/naplan-national-report-2017_final_04dec2017.pdf?sfvrsn=0
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588.
Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation. (2013). Rural and remote education: Literature review. https://www.cese.nsw.gov.au/component/k2/item/42-rural-and-remote-education-literature-review
Connolly, N. (2017). NAP sample assessment science literacy 2015: Public report. https://www.nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/20170309-nap_sl_final.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Cooper, G., Berry, A., & Baglin, J. (2020). Demographic predictors of students’ science participation over the age of 16: An Australian case study. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9692-0.
Education Council. (2015). National STEM school education strategy 2016–2026. Carlton South, Vic.: Education Council. http://www.educationcouncil.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/National%20STEM%20School%20Education%20Strategy.pdf.
Education Council. (2018). Optimising STEM industry-school partnerships: Inspiring Australia’s next generation. Carlton South, Vic.: Education Council.
Fenton, A., MacDonald, A., & McFarland, L. (2016). A strengths approach to supporting early mathematics learning in family contexts. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(1), 45–53.
Halsey, J. (2017). Independent review into regional, rural and remote education - a review of the literature 2006–2016 for the development of a discussion paper, a call for submissions and a national program of consultations. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/irrrre_lit_review_accessible.pdf
Hardré, P. L. (2011). Motivation for math in rural schools: Student and teacher perspectives. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0012-5.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Report for the Australian council of learned academies. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies. http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30059041/tytler-stemcountry-2013.pdf
Marzano, R. J. (2010). High expectations for all. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 82–85.
McPhan, G., Morony, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R., & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why not? Adelaide: AAMT. http://www.gsu.uts.edu.au/academicboard/cabs/082/papers/082-item6-1.pdf
Murphy, S. (2018). The impact of school disadvantage on senior secondary science: A study of patterns of participation and achievement in government secondary schools in Victoria, Australia. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9745-4.
Murphy, S. (2019a). Participation and achievement in technology education: The impact of school location and socioeconomic status on senior secondary technology studies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09499-4.
Murphy, S. (2019b). School location and socioeconomic status and patterns of participation and achievement in senior secondary mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31, 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0251-9.
Reed, J. (2007). Appreciative inquiry. New York: SAGE publications, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983464.
Sharma, M. (2016). Seeping deficit thinking assumptions maintain the neoliberal education agenda: Exploring three conceptual frameworks of deficit thinking in Inner-City schools. Education and Urban Society, 50(2), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124516682301.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430.
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Buckley, S. (2013). PISA 2012: How Australia measures up. Carldon Vic.: Australian Council of Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=ozpisa
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2017a). PISA 2015: Reporting Australia's results. Carldon, Vic.: Australian Council of Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/22/
Thomson, S., Wernert, N., O'Grady, E., & Rodrigues, S. (2017b). TIMSS 2015: Reporting Australia's results. Carlton, Vic.: Australian Council of Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/timss_2015/2/
Tytler, R., Williams, G., Hobbs, L., & Anderson, J. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for a STEM interdisciplinary agenda. In B. Doig, J. Williams, D. Swanson, R. Borromeo Ferri, & P. Drake (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Mathematics Education: The State of the Art and Beyond (pp. 51–81). Springer International Publishing.
Weldon, P. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in Australian seconday schools. ACER. https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=policyinsights
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5 edition. ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, S. Achieving STEM education success against the odds. Curric Perspect 40, 241–246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00110-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00110-8