Abstract
Using the Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth (LSAY) data, this paper aimed to examine if, and to what extent, demographic factors predict students’ participation in science over the age of 16 (post-16). While all the students participating in this study are attending Australian schools, the comprehensiveness of these datasets, together with inclusion of studies from around the world provides a useful reference point for an international audience. Over 7000 students are included in the analysis of this paper. Characteristics of focus in this paper include groups who have been identified as being underrepresented in past studies including Indigenous students, those from lower-socio-economic status (SES) backgrounds, sex differences and immigrants. Among the factors tested, Indigenous status was the strongest negative predictor of post-16 science participation. SES was also a relatively strong predictor of post-16 science participation. Compared to students categorised with an Australian-ancestry, first-generation and foreign-background students were more likely to participate in post-16 science. The findings of this study contribute to existing research on debates about equity and trends in science participation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamuti-Trache, M., & Andres, L. (2008). Embarking on and persisting in scientific fields of study: cultural capital, gender, and curriculum along the science pipeline. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1557–1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701324208
Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Aikenhead, G. (1997). Toward a First Nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Science Education, 81(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199704)81:2<217::aid-sce6>3.3.co;2-3
Aikenhead, G., & Jegede, O. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: a cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269::aid-tea3>3.3.co;2-k
Ainley, J., Kos, J., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in science, mathematics and technology in Australian education. ACER. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/acer_monographs/4/
Akther, A., & Robinson, J. (2014). Immigrant students’ academic performance in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/publications-database.php/9559/immigrant-students-academic-performance-in-australia-new-zealand-canada-and-singapore
Archer, L., Osborne, J., DeWitt, J., & Dillon, J. (2013). Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–14. Retrieved 19 April 2017, from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/aspires/aspires-final-report-december-2013.pdf
Aschbacher, P., Li, E., & Roth, E. (2009). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Estimates and projections, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 2001 to 2026. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Power and ideology in education. New York: Oxford University Press.
Business Council of Australia. (2014). A plan to maximise the comparative advantage of each sector of the Australian economy. Bca.com.au. Retrieved 14 November 2017, from http://www.bca.com.au/publications/building-australias-comparative-advantages
Commonwealth of Australia. (2015). Closing the gap prime minister’s report 2015. Retrieved 21 April 2017, from https:/www.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/Closing_the_Gap_2015_Report.pdf
De Bortoli, L., & Thomson, S. (2010). Contextual factors that influence the achievement of Australia’s Indigenous students: results from PISA 2000–2006. ACER. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=ozpisa
Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(3), 201–213.
Dreise, T., & Thomson, S. (2014). Unfinished business: PISA shows indigenous youth are being left behind. ACER. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=indigenous_education
Entorf, H., & Tatsi, E. (2009). Migrants at school: educational inequality and social interaction in the UK and Germany. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46442586_Migrants_at_School_Educational_Inequality_and_Social_Interaction_in_the_UK_and_Germany
Fullarton, S., & Ainley, J. (2000). Subject choice by students in year 12 in Australian secondary schools. ACER. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=lsay_research
Fullarton, S., Walker, M., Ainley, J., & Hillman, K. (2003). Patterns of participation in year 12. ACER. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/lsay_research/37/
Gorard, S., & See, B. (2009). The impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in science. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 93–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681821
Green, D., Billy, J., & Tapim, A. (2010). Indigenous Australians’ knowledge of weather and climate. Climatic Change, 100(2), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9803-z
Hackling, M., Ramseger, J., & Chen, H. (2017). Quality teaching in primary science education. Cham: Springer.
Halpern, D., Benbow, C., Geary, D., Gur, R., Shibley Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
Hauck, W., & Donner, A. (1977). Wald’s test as applied to hypotheses in logit analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72(360), 851–853. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286473
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education—a pedagogical justification and the state of the art in Isreal, Germany and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1459–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
Hugo, G. (2006). Temporary migration and the labour market in Australia. Australian Geographer, 37(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180600672359
Kaspura, A. (2017). Engineers make things happen: the need for an engineering pipeline strategy. Canberra. Retrieved from https:/www.engineersaustralia.org.au/resource-centre/resource/engineers-make-things-happen-report
Kaushal, N., & Lu, Y. (2014). Recent immigration to Canada and the United States: a mixed tale of relative selection. International Migration Review, 49(2), 479–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12093
Kennedy, J. P., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46.
Krajcik, J., & Czerniak, C. (2014). Teaching science in elementary and middle school (1st ed.). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2007). Science education and student diversity: race/ethnicity, language, culture, and socioeconomic status. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (1st ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lyons, T, & Quinn, F. (2010). Choosing science: understanding the declines in senior high school science enrolments. National Centre of Science, ICT and mathematics education tor rural and regional Australia (SiMERR Australia), University of New England.
Lyons, T. (2006). The puzzle of falling enrolments in physics and chemistry courses: putting some pieces together. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9008-z
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: country comparisons: international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
Martin, A., Liem, G., Mok, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Problem solving and immigrant student mathematics and science achievement: multination findings from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1054–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029152
McGee, L. (2014). Designing early literacy programs. New York: Guilford Press.
Minutjukur, M., & Osborne, S. (2014). At the heart of learning (series paper 2 of 4): Witulya mulapa nganana mantjintjaku: from cultural devastation to cultural reinvention. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 10(1), 15–22.
Norris, R., & Hamacher, D. (2010). Astronomical symbolism in Australian Aboriginal rock art. Rock art research. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4753
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Pascoe, B. (2014). Dark emu: black seeds agriculture or accident? (1st ed.). Broome: Magabala.
PISA. (2012). Scaling procedures and construct validation of context questionnaire data. Retrieved 21 April 2017, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA%202012%20Technical%20Report_Chapter%2016.pdf
Rigney, D., & Hemming, S. (2014). Is closing the gap ‘enough? Ngarrindjeri ontologies, reconciliation and caring for country. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(5), 536–545.
Settlage, J., Southerland, S., Smetana, L., & Lottero-Perdue, P. (2018). Teaching science to every child: using culture as a starting point (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005a). The ROSE project: an overview and key findings. Retrieved from http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf
Sjøberg, S. & Schreiner, C.(2005b). Science education and youth's identity construction - two incompatible projects? Retrieved from https://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/Values-ROSE-Schreiner-Sjoberg.pdf
The Royal Society. (2008). Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status and participation and attainment in science education. Royalsociety.org. Retrieved 14 November 2017, from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2008/4294969756.pdf
Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Cripps Clarke, J. (2008). Opening up pathways: engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. Canberra: Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Unesdoc.unesco.org. Retrieved 14 November 2017, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0025/002534/253479E.pdf
Wang, M., Chow, A., Degol, J., & Eccles, J. (2016). Does everyone’s motivational beliefs about physical science decline in secondary school?: heterogeneity of adolescents’ achievement motivation trajectories in physics and chemistry. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(8), 1821–1838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0620-1
Ward, T. (2013). Sport in Australian national identity (1st ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, G., Berry, A. & Baglin, J. Demographic Predictors of Students’ Science Participation over the Age of 16: an Australian Case Study. Res Sci Educ 50, 361–373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9692-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9692-0