Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spent fluid cracking and spent alumina catalysts as sustainable construction materials in concrete

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spent catalysts are the industrial by-product generated from oil refineries. These deactivated catalysts are disposed of in landfills posing a substantial burden on the environment. Given their physical and chemical properties, spent catalysts have the potential to be used as a construction material in concrete production. Therefore, this study investigates the alternative use of spent fluid cracking catalyst (SFCC) and spent alumina catalyst (SAC) in concrete production. These spent catalysts were used in concrete as a partial replacement of sand (up to 25%) or cement (up to 10%). The physico-mechanical properties and durability of concrete with these spent catalysts were studied. Results indicate that concrete setting time decreased by increasing spent catalyst content of any type in concrete. Improvement in mechanical properties was observed in mixtures made with SFCC as a sand replacement. Conversely, no improvement was recorded when SAC was used as a sand replacement. Concrete with SFCC or SAC as a cement replacement exhibited similar strength to that of the control mixture when used only in small quantities at a water-to-binder (w/b) ratio of 0.7. The use of SFCC as a partial replacement of sand has a positive effect on the concrete's corrosion resistance. However, the inclusion of SAC in concrete has a detrimental effect on corrosion resistance. The study concluded that both spent catalysts are a good alternative as a partial replacement of cement in concrete. Furthermore, SFCC is one of the good options to be used as a green fine aggregate and cement additive material in concrete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Su N, Chen ZH, Fang HY (2001) Reuse of spent catalyst as fine aggregate in cement mortar. Cem Concr Compos 23:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00074-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharba AAK, Ibrahim AJ (2020) Evaluating the use of steel scrap, waste tiles, waste paving blocks and silica fume in flexural behavior of concrete. Innov Infrastruct Solut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00341-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fares AI, Sohel KMA, Al-Jabri K, Al-Mamun A (2021) Characteristics of ferrochrome slag aggregate and its uses as a green material in concrete – A review. Constr Build Mater 294:123552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allahverdi A, Shahrbabaki MN, Ghezelasheghi M, Mahinroosta M (2019) Sulfate resistance of RFCC spent catalyst-blended Portland cement. Bol la Soc Esp Ceram y Vidr 58:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2018.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matos AM, Nunes S, Costa C, Barroso-Aguiar JL (2019) Spent equilibrium catalyst as internal curing agent in UHPFRC. Cem Concr Compos 104:103362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marafi M, Stanislaus A (2003) Options and processes for spent catalyst handling and utilization. J Hazard Mater 101:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00145-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Furimsky E (1996) Spent refinery catalysts: environment, safety and utilization. Catal Today 30:223–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(96)00094-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xue Y, Wei X, Zhao H et al (2020) Interaction of spent FCC catalyst and asphalt binder: rheological properties, emission of VOCs and immobilization of metals. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferella F, Innocenzi V, Maggiore F (2016) Oil refining spent catalysts: a review of possible recycling technologies. Resour Conserv Recycl 108:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alonso-Fariñas B, Rodríguez-Galán M, Arenas C et al (2020) Sustainable management of spent fluid catalytic cracking catalyst from a circular economy approach. Waste Manag 110:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Jabri K, Baawain M, Taha R et al (2013) Potential use of FCC spent catalyst as partial replacement of cement or sand in cement mortars. Constr Build Mater 39:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alshamsi K, Baawain M, Aljabri K et al (2012) Utilizing waste spent catalyst in asphalt mixtures. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci 53:326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Jabri K, Al-Kamyani Z, Taha R et al (2013) Effect of spent catalyst as a fine aggregate on the properties of concrete. In: AEI 2013: Building Solutions for Architectural Engineering, pp 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412909.065

  14. Castellanos NT, Agredo JT (2010) Using spent fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalyst as pozzolanic addition–A review. Ing e Investig 30:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  15. Payá J, Monzó J, Borrachero MV (1999) Fluid catalytic cracking catalyst residue (FC3R): an excellent mineral by-product for improving early-strength development of cement mixtures. Cem Concr Res 29:1773–1779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00164-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Nguyen C, Lambert P, Bui VN (2020) Effect of locally sourced pozzolan on corrosion resistance of steel in reinforced concrete beams. Int J Civ Eng 18:619–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00492-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chore HS, Joshi MP (2020) Strength characterization of concrete using industrial waste as cement replacing materials for rigid pavement. Innov Infrastruct Solut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00328-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taha R, Al-Kamyani Z, Al-Jabri K et al (2012) Recycling of waste spent catalyst in road construction and masonry blocks. J Hazard Mater 229–230:122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Asensio E, Medina C, Frías M, Sánchez de Rojas MI (2018) Use of clay-based construction and demolition waste as additions in the design of new low and very low heat of hydration cements. Mater Struct Constr. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1226-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Malhotra VM, Mehta PK (1996) Pozzolanic and Cementitious Materials, vol 1. Taylor & Francis, UK

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmadi B, Shekarchi M (2010) Use of natural zeolite as a supplementary cementitious material. Cem Concr Compos 32:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Antiohos SK, Chouliara E, Tsimas S (2006) Re-use of spent catalyst from oil-cracking refineries as supplementary cementing material. China Particuology 4:73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1672-2515(07)60238-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pacewska B, Bukowska M, Wilińska I, Swat M (2002) Modification of the properties of concrete by a new pozzolan–A waste catalyst from the catalytic process in a fluidized bed. Cem Concr Res 32:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00646-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Da Y, He T, Wang M et al (2020) The effect of spent petroleum catalyst powders on the multiple properties in blended cement. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh B (2009) Treatment of spent catalyst from the nitrogenous fertilizer industry-A review of the available methods of regeneration, recovery and disposal. J Hazard Mater 167:24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pacewska B, Wilińska I, Bukowska M (2009) Calorimetric investigations of the influence of waste aluminosilicate on the hydration of different cements. J Therm Anal Calorim 97:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-008-9668-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pacewska B, Wilińska I, Kubissa J (1998) Use of spent catalyst from catalytic cracking in fluidized bed as a new concrete additive. Thermochim Acta 322:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(98)00498-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Payá J, Monzó J, Borrachero MV (2001) Physical, chemical and mechanical properties of fluid catalytic cracking catalyst residue (FC3R) blended cements. Cem Concr Res 31:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00432-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dyer A (2013) Ion Exchange☆. In: Reference module in chemistry, molecular sciences and chemical engineering. Elsevier, London, pp 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.04402-4

  30. Rattanasak U, Jaturapitakkul C, Sudaprasert T (2001) Compressive strength and heavy metal leaching behaviour of mortars containing spent catalyst. Waste Manag Res 19:456–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0101900511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun DD (2003) Stabilization treatment for reutilization of spent refinery catalyst into value-added product. Energy Sources 25:607–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310390195679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Neves R, Vicente C, Castela A, Montemor MF (2015) Durability performance of concrete incorporating spent fluid cracking catalyst. Cem Concr Compos 55:308–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Shamsi K, Baawain M, Aljabri K et al (2015) Mix design and moisture susceptibility of asphalt concrete mixes containing waste catalyst from oil refineries. Int J Pavement Res Technol 8:426–432. https://doi.org/10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2015.8(6).426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Costa C, Marques JC (2018) Feasibility of eco-friendly binary and ternary blended binders made of fly-ash and oil-refinery spent catalyst in ready-mixed concrete production. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Omani Standard OS2-1982 (1982) Natural aggregate; Specification, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Directorate General for Specifications and Measurements, Oman

  36. Pacewska B, Nowacka M, Wilińska I et al (2011) Studies on the influence of spent FCC catalyst on hydration of calcium aluminate cements at ambient temperature. J Therm Anal Calorim 105:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1303-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Dhamri H, Melghit K (2010) Use of alumina spent catalyst and RFCC wastes from petroleum refinery to substitute bauxite in the preparation of Portland clinker. J Hazard Mater 179:852–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. ASTM C403/C403M–16 (2016) Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Concrete Mixtures by Penetration Resistance, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0403_C0403M-16

  39. ASTM C642–13 (2013) Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0642-13

  40. Jackson N, Dhir R (1996) Civil Engineering Materials, 5th ed. Palgrave Publishers ltd, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY

  41. Wu JH, Wu WL, Hsu KC (2003) The effect of waste oil-cracking catalyst on the compressive strength of cement pastes and mortars. Cem Concr Res 33:245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01006-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Monzó J, Payá J, Borrachero MV et al (2004) Reusing of Spent FCC catalyst as a very reactive pozzolanic material: formulation of High performance concretes. Vázquez E, Hendriks CF, Janssen GMT (eds) International RILEM Conference on the Use of Recycled Materials in Building and Structures. RILEM Publications SARL, pp 1008–1016

  43. EN 1992–1-1:2004 (2004) Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee For Standardization, Brussels, Belgium

Download references

Funding

Oman Refineries and Petrochemical Industrial Company (Orpic) and Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) under Grant No. CR/ENG/CIVL/09/01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

    Khalifa Al-Jabri, Khalid Al-Shamsi, Abdullah Al-Saidy & Kazi M. A. Sohel

  2. Public Authority for Electricity and Water, Muscat, Oman

    Zahran Al-Kamyani

Authors
  1. Khalifa Al-Jabri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zahran Al-Kamyani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khalid Al-Shamsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abdullah Al-Saidy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kazi M. A. Sohel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazi M. A. Sohel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Jabri, K., Al-Kamyani, Z., Al-Shamsi, K. et al. Spent fluid cracking and spent alumina catalysts as sustainable construction materials in concrete. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00560-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00560-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation