Advertisement

Biophysics Reports

, Volume 4, Issue 6, pp 339–347 | Cite as

In situ protein micro-crystal fabrication by cryo-FIB for electron diffraction

  • Xinmei Li
  • Shuangbo Zhang
  • Jianguo Zhang
  • Fei Sun
Open Access
Method
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

Micro-electron diffraction (MicroED) is an emerging technique to use cryo-electron microscope to study the crystal structures of macromolecule from its micro-/nano-crystals, which are not suitable for conventional X-ray crystallography. However, this technique has been prevented for its wide application by the limited availability of producing good micro-/nano-crystals and the inappropriate transfer of crystals. Here, we developed a complete workflow to prepare suitable crystals efficiently for MicroED experiment. This workflow includes in situ on-grid crystallization, single-side blotting, cryo-focus ion beam (cryo-FIB) fabrication, and cryo-electron diffraction of crystal cryo-lamella. This workflow enables us to apply MicroED to study many small macromolecular crystals with the size of 2–10 μm, which is too large for MicroED but quite small for conventional X-ray crystallography. We have applied this method to solve 2.5 Å crystal structure of lysozyme from its micro-crystal within the size of 10 × 10 × 10 μm3. Our work will greatly expand the availability space of crystals suitable for MicroED and fill up the gap between MicroED and X-ray crystallography.

Keywords

Cryo-electron microscopy Cryo focused ion beam Electron diffraction In situ crystallization Micro-crystal 

Introduction

In 1960, the crystal structures of myoglobin and hemoglobin were solved (Kendrew et al. 1960; Perutz et al. 1960) by X-ray crystallography, opening the era of structural biology. Till now, there have been hundreds of thousands of biomacromolecular structures that were determined by X-ray crystallography. The size of biomacromolecular crystal should be large enough to gain efficient signal–noise ratio (SNR) of diffractions. For the home source of X-ray generated from rotating anode, the size of crystal needs to be larger than 200 μm normally (Mizohata et al. 2018). While the emergence of synchrotron radiation allows a brilliant and coherent source of X-ray, which can increase SNR of diffractions especially at the high-resolution region, thus even a smaller crystal (ca. 50–200 μm) still generate significant diffractions for structure determination (Mizohata et al. 2018). The emerge of the micro-focus beamline based on the third-generation synchrotron source has yield micro-crystallography, which made high-resolution data collection from very small crystals (ca. 10–50 μm) possible (Smith et al. 2012). The widespread use of synchrotron radiation has accelerated the development of X-ray crystallography and structural biology.

However, many biomacromolecules could not be crystallized into large crystals, e.g., membrane proteins and biomacromolecular complexes. When the size of crystal is further smaller than 10 μm, the current source of X-ray from synchrotron radiation could not yield high SNR diffractions. More importantly, the severe radiation damage from high flux X-ray exposure makes it impossible to collect a complete diffraction dataset from a single crystal, even under the cryogenic condition (Johansson et al. 2017). The  emerge of X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) and the development of serial femtosecond X-ray crystallography (SFX) provide an alternative solution (Chapman et al. 2011). The extremely short and highly intensive X-ray pulse makes it possible to collect high SNR and “radiation damage free” diffraction data from a single micro-crystal (ca. 1–10 μm) (Mizohata et al. 2018). Each micro-crystal generates one frame of diffraction image before obliterated (Neutze et al. 2000). Tens of thousands of micro-crystals are needed to generate a complete dataset. In recent years, SFX has been successfully applied to solve many important and difficult crystal structures, including the human angiotensin II type 1 (Zhang et al. 2015) and photon-synthesis complex II (Suga et al. 2017). Furthermore, the extremely short pulse (10–100 fs) of XFEL also enables time-resolved SFX and people can investigate the transient structural changes of photon-synthesis complex II upon light stimulation (Suga et al. 2017). However, culturing tens of thousands of micro-crystals and the limited accessibility of XFEL facility have restricted the wide application of SFX technology.

Besides diffracting X-ray, biomacromolecular crystals could also diffract electron, which is called electron crystallography when 2D crystals are investigated, or called micro-electron diffraction (MicroED) for 3D crystals. Investigation on biological specimens by electron crystallography arguably began when Parsons and Martius used electron diffraction to investigate the structure of muscle fibers in 1964 (Parsons and Martius 1964). In 2005, the 2D electron crystallography has been successfully utilized to solve the high-resolution structure of water channel AQP0 in a closed conformation at 1.9 Å (Gonen et al. 2005). Considering there are only 17 plane groups allowed for 2D protein crystals while there are 65 symmetries allowed for 3D protein crystals (Nannenga Brent et al. 2013), it is of less successful rate to grow a 2D crystal rather than a 3D crystal (Martynowycz and Gonen 2018). Furthermore, the extreme difficulty of culturing high-quality 2D crystals of bio-macromolecules has limited the wide application of 2D electron crystallography.

In 2013, Shi et al. first utilized MicroED to solve the crystal structure of lysozyme at 2.9 Å resolution (Shi et al. 2013) and later improved the data quality by changing still diffraction mode to continuous rotation diffraction mode (Nannenga et al. 2014b). Compared with X-ray, electron has much larger scattering cross-section when interacting with atoms (Henderson 2009). Thus, the size of micro-crystal is large enough to generate high SNR diffractions by using MicroED. The size of crystal used in MicroED experiment is within 500 nm (Nannenga and Gonen 2014), much smaller than the one in traditional X-ray crystallography experiments.

In recent years, MicroED has been further developed and applied to solve the crystal structures of a-synuclein (Rodriguez et al. 2015), prions (Sawaya et al. 2016) and the human fused in sarcoma low-complexity domain (FUS LC) (Luo et al. 2018) in atomic resolution. The crystals of these successful examples were always thin although they were long and wide. For example, the crystals of the a-synuclein are needle-like with the thickness of 20–50 nm (Rodriguez et al. 2015). The thickness of the crystal directly determines the quality of diffraction data (Nannenga and Gonen 2014) due to the mean free path of electron. For 300 kV electron, its mean free path for the vitrified biospecimen is ~350 nm, while for 200 kV electron, it is ~300 nm (Yan et al. 2015). When the thickness of the crystal is over beyond the mean free path of electron, multi-scattering events will become significant and then the diffraction pattern will become difficult to explain. As a result, for a success of MicroED experiment, nano-crystals not micro-crystals are actually needed.

The emergence of MicroED has provided an alternative solution to X-ray crystallography and it is possible to solve the crystal structure of biomacromolecule using a single nanocrystal by MicroED. However, there are still several bottlenecks left, limiting the wide application of MicroED. Firstly, it is difficult to grow and screen nano-crystals. Nano-crystals are invisible under light microscope and their growth process is difficult to monitor. Transmission electron microscope is the only way to screen the presence of nano-crystals, which is in a low throughput. The previous trials of breaking big crystals into tiny bricks were not successful (personal communication). Secondly, the current sample freezing procedure (blotting and plunge-freezing) for single particle analysis is not optimized for MicroED sample preparation. The viscous crystallization liquid could not be easily blotted and the double-sided blotting step could damage delicate crystals easily (Shian et al. 2017). In addition, more importantly, there are many bio-macromolecules that can be crystallized into microcrystal with the size of 2–10 μm. These crystals could not be analyzed by traditional X-ray crystallography and even by SFX easily. For MicroED, the size of these crystals is also beyond the feasible range.

The recent emergence of cryo focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) technique (Marko et al. 2006) provides a solution to prepare suitable size of crystal for MicroED experiment. This technique was first applied to prepare a cryo-lamella of bacterial cells (Marko et al. 2007) and later to eukaryotic microbial cells (Rigort et al. 2012) and mammalian cells (Strunk et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2012). We also developed this technique with the name of D-cryo-FIB (Zhang et al. 2016), which has been used to prepare cryo-lamella for subsequent cryo-electron tomography experiment (Li et al. 2015).

Here, based on our D-cryo-FIB technique, we report a workflow of in situ protein crystallization and fabrication for subsequent successful MicroED experiment. We grew protein crystals on grids directly to reduce the possibility of crystal missing during sample transfer. The grids were blotted from back side to alleviate the crystal damage due to blot force. Then the crystals frozen on the grid were selected and milled into a thin lamella by cryo-FIB. The cryo-lamella was then used to collect electron diffraction dataset for structure determination. We show here that we successfully solved the crystal structure of lysozyme at 2.5 Å resolution by using seven micro lysozyme crystals within the size of 10 × 10 × 10 μm3.

Results and discussion

To set up a workflow from in situ protein crystallization, cryo-vitrification, and cryo-FIB fabrication to the subsequent cryo-electron diffraction data collection, we selected lysozyme as the testing sample since it is well characterized and was previously used for MicroED experiments (Shi et al. 2013).

Originally, we followed the previously published protocol (Shi et al. 2013) to grow lysozyme crystals by hanging drop vapor diffusion method, and tried to add the crystallization drop from the cover slip to the grid for 1 min adsorption before washing and vitrification. However, by examining in cryo-electron microscope, we found the low successful rate of the crystal absorption on the grid and the crystal could be easily destroyed by the pipette during the drop transfer process. Thus, to overcome this difficulty, we sought to try growing crystals directly on the grid to reduce the loss of the crystal and minimize its potential damage during sample transfer. A holy carbon coated metal grid (Fig. 1A, B) was used in the present study. The sitting crystallization drop was directly added to the surface of a grow-discharge treated grid that is supported by a clean plastic micro-bridge (Fig. 1C). This experimental setup allows the crystals to grow on the carbon surface of the grid.
Fig. 1

In situ on-grid protein crystallization setup. A A magnified SEM image of the non-magnetic nickel grid coated with holy carbon film. Scale bar, 16.7 μm. B A further magnified SEM image in A showing the structural details of the holy carbon film. Scale bar, 1.7 μm. C The schematic diagram of the sitting drop vapor diffusion setup for in situ on-grid protein crystallization. The real photo of the micro-bridge is shown in right. Scale bar, 0.35 mm

Different metal grids were screened to select the most suitable one for in situ crystallization. For the copper grids, we found the copper is chemically reactive in crystallization buffer and the dissolved copper ion could denature the protein and affect the quality of the crystal severely (see the green colored crystal in Fig. 2A), which was subsequently proved by X-ray diffraction experiments (data not shown here). Then the titanium (Fig. 2B), molybdenum (Fig. 2C) and non-magnetic nickel grids (Fig. 2D) were tested. All these three grids could allow crystal grow on the carbon surface. Since these grids are stainless with good chemical inertia, there were no chemical effects observed to decrease the crystal quality. Considering the cost and availability, we selected the D-shaped non-magnetic nickel grid (Fig. 2D) for the subsequent experiment.
Fig. 2

Photographs of the lysozyme crystals growing on different grids. A Copper grid. B Titanium grid. C Molybdenum grid. D Non-magnetic nickel grid. Scale bar, 500 μm

The crystallization drop contains 15% PEG5000MME that has a high viscosity and is difficult to blot to get a thin layer during cryo-vitrification process. To overcome this difficulty, we used the washing buffer that contains 5% PEG200 instead of 15% PEG5000MME to wash the grid before blotting, which helped to get a thin ice layer on the grid after freezing. To optimize the washing buffer that does not affect the quality of the crystals, we used to pick out some crystals and transfer them to the washing buffer and observed under a light microscope. There should be no obvious dissolving phenomenon appeared within one hour. After washing, the grid was blotted for 6 s from backside using Leica EMGP and then fast frozen in liquid ethane. The backside blotting is also important to prevent potential crystal loss and damage.

The vitrified D-shaped grid was transferred into the chamber of FIB/SEM by keeping the direction of the straight edge perpendicular to FIB (Zhang et al. 2016). The crystals were first identified and visualized by SEM (Fig. 3A, B). To choose the area of interest for FIB milling, there are a few criteria to be considered. Firstly, the position of the crystal should be close to the middle of the square. Otherwise, the metal grid bar would block FIB, causing the trimming process not thorough. In addition, the grid bar could also potentially block the electron beam during diffraction data collection when the grid is tilted. Secondly, it is important to select a separated single crystal to avoid potential twin diffraction images during data collection. In addition, a proper size (5–20 μm) of the crystal was selected. Smaller size would decrease the successful rate of the cryo-lamella production and also yield a very small area for MicroED. Larger size would increase significantly the time of FIB trimming and thus lower the throughput. After the cryo-lamella of crystal was formed, its thickness was measured from FIB image and could be judged from the low magnification TEM image (Fig. 3C). For a good crystal lamella, its electron diffraction could reach to 2.0 Å resolution (Fig. 3D) with our current experiment hardware.
Fig. 3

FIB fabrication of frozen lysozyme crystals on grid. A and B SEM images (SE detector) of frozen lysozyme crystals on grid with low magnification (A) and high magnification (B). The areas with strong contrast indicate the positions of the crystals. The black arrows indicate the crystals close to the grid bars and the red arrows indicate the crystals trimmed by FIB. Scale bars, 50 μm. C TEM micrograph of the FIB fabricated crystal lamella. Scale bar, 500 nm. D Cryo-electron diffraction pattern of the FIB fabricated crystal lamella in C

During electron diffraction data collection, crystals could be either tilted discretely or rotated continuously in the electron beam, which yield still diffraction image or continuous diffraction image. We wrote a simple script of SerialEM (see Supplementary Information) to collect tilt series of still diffraction images automatically. We were aware of that collecting continuous diffraction images could increase the accuracy of reciprocal spot intensity measurement. However, for our current camera setup, it was difficult to synchronize the stage rotation with the data recording of camera due to the imperfect mechanics of the stage and the significant lag of camera recording system. Thus, we made an appropriate approach to collect continuous diffraction images. In our approach, we utilized our script to collect tilt series of still diffraction frames with a very small angle interval. In the present work, the angle interval of 0.2° was used. The exposure time for each still diffraction frame was properly determined to balance its SNR and the total electron dose, and was set 0.2 s/frame in the present work. Then, numbers of frames were simply integrated to form a final image that approximates the continuous diffraction one. Here, every five continuous frames were merged into one image with a rotation angle width of 1° (Movie S1), which was ready for the subsequent processing in iMOSFLM (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Statistic parameters during electron diffraction dataset processing by iMOSFLM. A A representative average spot profile of one diffraction image (up) and a representative standard profile for different regions of the detector (down). The red line indicates the profile is poor and averaged by including reflections from inner regions. B The crystal-to-detector distance changes with different diffraction images. C The crystal orientation changes with different diffraction images. D The electron beam position changes with different diffraction images. E The averaged SNR of diffraction spots changes with different diffraction images. The yellow curve represents all partial spots and the red one for all full spots

The profiles of diffraction spots suggested that the diffraction spots can be properly indexed, predicted and integrated (Fig. 4A). We found a significant jump of crystal-to-detector distance at the first few frames (Fig. 4B), which might be due to the pre-calibration error of the camera length. While the detected variations of the crystal-to-detector distance and the crystal orientation (Fig. 4B, C) suggest that the stability of the microscope mechanical stage needs to be further optimized for MicroED experiments. From the statistics of the data processing (Fig. 4D), we also observed significant shift of electron beam position, which needs to be further investigated to find the reason. The existence of electron radiation damage and decay of crystal lattice could be indicated from the reduced SNR of diffraction spots during data collection (Fig. 4E). Finally, we collected seven datasets and merged into one dataset with space group of P43212, the resolution of 2.5 Å, and the overall cumulative completeness of 94.0% (Table 1). The relative high Rmerge of 0.356 would be caused by the inaccuracy of reciprocal spot intensity measurement, which could be most probably due to the poor hardware of our camera.
Table 1

Statistics of data collection, processing, and structural refinement

Data collection

 

 Excitation voltage (kV)

200

 Electron source

Field emission gun

 Wavelength (Å)

0.025

 Total electron dose per crystal (e2)

5–9

 Number of patterns per crystal

150–400

 No. of crystals used

7

 Nominal camera length (m)

1.35

 Real (corrected) camera length (m)

2.22

 Selective area aperture (μm)

100

 Rotation step (°)

0.2

Data processing

 

 Resolution (Å)

18.4–2.5

 Space group

P43212

 Unit cell dimensions

 

 a = b (Å)

77

 c (Å)

37

 α = β = γ (°)

90

 No. of total reflections

53,003

 No. of unique reflections

4235

 CC1/2 (overall/outer shell)

0.803/0.158

 < I/σ>

5.5

 Completeness (%) (overall/outer shell)

94.0/86.8

 Multiplicity (overall/outer shell)

12.5/12.7

 Rmerge

0.356

Structural refinement

 

 Resolution (Å)

18.4–2.5

 Reflections in working set

4206

 Reflections in test set

191

 Rwork/Rfree (%)

35.9/40.0

 r.m.s.d. bond length

0.005

 r.m.s.d. bond angle

0.976

The final merged and scaled intensity data can be directly used for molecular replacement with a single significant solution. The calculated electron potential map based on electron scattering factor and the refined structural model shows a clear envelope of the molecule in the crystal (Fig. 4A). The resolution and quality of the map can further be reflected by the unambiguity of residue assignment in Fig. 4B. The final structure was refined to 2.5 Å with Rwork of 35.9% and Rfree of 40.0% (Table 1). Again, we believe that the relative high R value is due to the inaccuracy of reciprocal spot intensity measurement. Considering the current resolution of 2.5 Å, we did not intend to assign water molecule in the map (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Electron potential map determined by molecular replacement. A The overall map fitted with the whole lysozyme structural model. B A zoomed-in view of the electron potential map around a selected region showing the resolution and quality of the map

Overall, in the present study, we developed a new approach to efficiently prepare suitable crystals for MicroED experiment. The in situ on-grid crystallization method avoids the potential loss of crystals during sample transfer, the single-side blotting method prevents the potential damage to the fragile crystals during vitrification, and the cryo-FIB fabrication method allows the crystals with the size of a few microns to be thinned for MicroED experiment. Finally, the large area of crystal cryo-lamella would yield a strong electron diffraction with good SNR. Thus a few crystals are enough to merge into a complete dataset for structural determination. Our work will greatly expand the availability space of crystals suitable for MicroED and fill up the gap between MicroED and X-ray crystallography.

In the future, we will further systematically investigate the influence of the thickness of crystal cryo-lamella for the MicroED data quality, and study whether the current and energy of focused ion beam would induce observable damage of crystal, which eventually affects the diffraction ability of the crystal.

Materials and methods

In situ crystallization and cryo-vitrification

Lysozyme was purchased by Sangon Biotech Company. A 200 mg/mL solution of lysozyme was prepared in 50 mmol/L sodium acetate pH 4.5. A grow-discharge treated nonmagnetic nickel grid with holy carbon film was placed facing up on a micro-bridge, and the protein was mixed 1:1 with the precipitant solution (0.35 mol/L sodium chloride; 15% PEG5000MME; 50 mmol/L sodium acetate pH 4.5) on the grid. Then the crystals were grown by the sitting drop vapor diffusion method (Fig. 1).

After the crystals formed, the grid was washed four times by washing buffer (0.35 mol/L sodium chloride; 5% PEG200; 50 mmol/L sodium acetate pH 4.5) before cryo-vitrification. Then the grid was blotted 6 s from the backside where no crystals grew on, and plunged into liquid ethane using the Leica EMGP. The frozen grids were transferred and stored in liquid nitrogen for the subsequent experiments.

Crystals fabrication by cryo-FIB

The frozed grid was loaded onto a home-made cryo-shuttle (Zhang et al. 2016) and then transferred into the chamber of a dual beam scanning electron microscope (FEI Helios NanoLab 600i) that is equipped with a Quorum PT3000 cryo-stage. The grid has been pre-tilted 45° on the shuttle. Then the grid was imaged and examined using electron beam and the signal from secondary electron with the following experimental parameters, an accelerating voltage of 2 kV, a beam current of 0.34 nA, and a dwell time of 3 µs. The region of interest (ROI) with crystals was identified and marked. Then focused ion gallium beam was utilized to perform fabrication of crystals. Before cryo-FIB milling, a thin layer of Pt was coated using GIS system to reduce the radiation damage during milling. The inclination angle of the beam was kept ~10° against the grid plane. The accelerating voltage of ion beam was 30 kV. Considering the block shape of the crystal, a large beam current of 0.43 nA was used to skive crystals efficiently. When a thick slice of lamella was made, the beam current was reduced to 80 pA for the fine trimming and also the reduction of potential radiation damage. The final thickness of the crystal cryo-lamella was controlled ~300 nm. Several crystal cryo-lamellas can be made in one grid. After cryo-FIB fabrication, the grid was transferred and kept in liquid nitrogen for the subsequent MicroED experiment.

Cryo-electron diffraction and data collection

Cryo-electron diffraction of cryo-FIB fabricated crystal was collected using cryo-electron microscope FEI Talos F200C equipped with a field-emission gun operated at 200 kV (λ = 0.0251 Å). And the diffraction patterns were recorded by the FEI Ceta camera with 4096 × 4096 pixels and the physical pixel size of 14 μm. We utilized SerialEM (Mastronarde 2005) to control the microscope and collect the diffraction datasets.

The frozen grid was loaded into the microscope using a Gatan cryo-transfer holder (Model 626) that was precooled in liquid nitrogen. The straight side of the D-shaped grid (Zhang et al. 2016) was kept parallel to the rotation axis of the holder. ROIs that were trimmed by cryo-FIB were located in low magnification of SA2600X (view mode in SerialEM).

Then, at the exposure mode in SerialEM, the spot size and the illumination area were adjusted to yield a very low electron dose of 0.07 e/(Å2·s) for the diffraction experiment. To measure the electron dose accurately, the microscope should be in image mode and high magnification so that the electron beam can spread over the entire screen. Eventually, in our experiment setup, the spot size was selected as nine and the excitation level of C2 lens was kept at 45.3000%. After the electron dose was determined, the microscope was switched to diffraction mode. The nominal camera length was set to 1.35 m that was calibrated to 2.22 m by measuring the diffraction pattern of gold crystal. The excitation level of objective lens was set and kept at 85.5148%. The diffraction lens was adjusted to focus the central beam. Then, we switched back and forth between the image and diffraction modes to make sure that the excitation levels of objective and C2 lens did not change. Finally, we switched to diffraction mode and saved all the parameters to the exposure mode in SerialEM.

When all the parameters were setup, we moved the cryo-FIB fabricated crystal to the center of the screen in the view mode of SerialEM, and then chose a selective aperture of 100 μm in diameter to just cover the area of the crystal. Then we switched to the exposure mode in SerialEM. A customized SerialEM script (see Supplementary Information) was written to collect diffraction data in an approximate continuous rotation mode, in which the crystal was initially rotated to −40° (or other degree) and then started to rotate to 40° (or other degree). For every 0.2° increment, a diffraction frame was recorded with the exposure time of 0.2 s and stored in TIFF format. For the rotation angle range from −40° to 40°, we collected 400 frames with the approximate total dose of ~6 e/(Å2·s). In total, we collected multiple diffraction datasets from different cryo-FIB fabricated crystals. For each crystal, the total electron dose was kept below 9 e/(Å2·s).

Processing of electron diffraction datasets

We first exacted the dark background from every raw diffraction image and then summed every five frames to the final one with an “expected” oscillation angle width of 1°. The program developed in Tamir Gonen’s lab for converting TVIPS camera image to the SMV format (http://cryoem.janelia.org/pages/MicroED) was slightly modified based on our microscope and camera system, and then used to convert our datasets from TIFF format to SMV format.

Then the converted diffraction datasets were processed (index and integration) by iMOSFLM 7.2.1 (Battye et al. 2011). Different with processing X-ray crystallography datasets, a wide rotation angle range was used for a successful index because the Ewald sphere in electron diffraction is very flat. Secondly, due to the instability of microscope stage, the crystal orientation and the distance from the crystal to the detector would change during data collection, which should be carefully considered during data integration process. Furthermore, our camera FEI CETA was not well characterized for electron diffraction experiment, and the GAIN parameter defined in iMOSFLM is generally unknown. Thus, it is important and necessary to try different GAIN values (1.5–2.5) during data integration process.

Due to the instability of our microscope, the first several frames of each dataset were dropped. Seven datasets were merged, scaled and converted to structure factor amplitudes using AIMLESS (Evans and Murshudov 2013) to increase the completeness of diffraction data. Then molecular replacement was performed using PHASER (McCoy et al. 2007) with the starting model (PDB code, 4AXT) of lysozyme structure. Finally, REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al. 2007) was used to perform structural refinement by taking electron scattering factors into consideration.

The statistics of data collection, processing, and structural refinement are summarized in Table 1.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ping Shan and Ruigang Su (F.S. lab) for their assistances. We are grateful to Dr. Xiaojun Huang, Dr. Zhenxi Guo and Mr. Deyin Fan (CBI, IBP) for their support on the microscope operation and calibration. This work was supported by grants from Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDKYYQ20170002 and XDB08030202) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2017YFA0504700 and 2014CB910700). All the EM works were performed at Center for Biological Imaging (CBI, http://cbi.ibp.ac.cn), Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Xinmei Li, Shuangbo Zhang and Fei Sun declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Data Availability

The raw TIFF files of diffraction images, the program to convert TIFF files to OSC files, the final merged structural factor MTZ file as well as the refined model PDB file are available at the webpage of the lab (http://feilab.ibp.ac.cn/data/FIB-MicroED).

Supplementary material

41048_2018_75_MOESM1_ESM.avi (3 mb)
Movie S1 A representative movie showing the electron diffraction pattern changes along the rotation of the crystal (AVI 3040 kb)
41048_2018_75_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (59 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 58 kb)

References

  1. Battye TGG, Kontogiannis L, Johnson O, Powell HR, Leslie AGW (2011) iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr Sect D 67:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapman HN, Fromme P, Barty A, White TA, Kirian RA, Aquila A, Hunter MS, Schulz J, DePonte DP, Weierstall U, Doak RB, Maia FR, Martin AV, Schlichting I, Lomb L, Coppola N, Shoeman RL, Epp SW, Hartmann R, Rolles D, Rudenko A, Foucar L, Kimmel N, Weidenspointner G, Holl P, Liang M, Barthelmess M, Caleman C, Boutet S, Bogan MJ, Krzywinski J, Bostedt C, Bajt S, Gumprecht L, Rudek B, Erk B, Schmidt C, Hömke A, Reich C, Pietschner D, Strüder L, Hauser G, Gorke H, Ullrich J, Herrmann S, Schaller G, Schopper F, Soltau H, Kühnel KU, Messerschmidt M, Bozek JD, Hau-Riege SP, Frank M, Hampton CY, Sierra RG, Starodub D, Williams GJ, Hajdu J, Timneanu N, Seibert MM, Andreasson J, Rocker A, Jönsson O, Svenda M, Stern S, Nass K, Andritschke R, Schröter CD, Krasniqi F, Bott M, Schmidt KE, Wang X, Grotjohann I, Holton JM, Barends TR, Neutze R, Marchesini S, Fromme R, Schorb S, Rupp D, Adolph M, Gorkhover T, Andersson I, Hirsemann H, Potdevin G, Graafsma H, Nilsson B, Spence JC (2011) Femtosecond X-ray protein nanocrystallography. Nature 470:73–77Google Scholar
  3. Evans PR, Murshudov GN (2013) How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr Sect D 69:1204–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gonen T, Cheng Y, Sliz P, Hiroaki Y, Fujiyoshi Y, Harrison SC, Walz T (2005) Lipid–protein interactions in double-layered two-dimensional AQP0 crystals. Nature 438:633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henderson R (2009) The potential and limitations of neutrons, electrons and X-rays for atomic resolution microscopy of unstained biological molecules. Q Rev Biophys 28:171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iadanza MG, Gonen T (2014) A suite of software for processing MicroED data of extremely small protein crystals. J Appl Crystallogr 47:1140–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johansson LC, Stauch B, Ishchenko A, Cherezov V (2017) A bright future for serial femtosecond crystallography with XFELs. Trends Biochem Sci 42:749–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kendrew JC, Dickerson RE, Strandberg BE, Hart RG, Davies DR, Phillips DC, Shore VC (1960) Structure of myoglobin: A three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 2 Å. Resolution. Nature 185:422–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li X, Feng H, Zhang J, Sun L, Zhu P (2015) Analysis of chromatin fibers in Hela cells with electron tomography. Biophys Rep 1:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Luo F, Gui X, Zhou H, Gu J, Li Y, Liu X, Zhao M, Li D, Li X, Liu C (2018) Atomic structures of FUS LC domain segments reveal bases for reversible amyloid fibril formation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 25:341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marko M, Hsieh C, Moberlychan W, Mannella CA, Frank J (2006) Focused ion beam milling of vitreous water: prospects for an alternative to cryo-ultramicrotomy of frozen-hydrated biological samples. J Microsc 222:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marko M, Hsieh C, Schalek R, Frank J, Mannella C (2007) Focused-ion-beam thinning of frozen-hydrated biological specimens for cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods 4:215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martynowycz MW, Gonen T (2018) From electron crystallography of 2D crystals to MicroED of 3D crystals. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 34:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mastronarde DN (2005) Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J Struct Biol 152:36–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayer J, Giannuzzi LA, Kamino T, Michael J (2011) TEM sample preparation and FIB-induced damage. MRS Bull 32:400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ (2007) Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40:658–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mizohata E, Nakane T, Fukuda Y, Nango E, Iwata S (2018) Serial femtosecond crystallography at the SACLA: breakthrough to dynamic structural biology. Biophys Rev 10:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ (2007) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr Sect D 53:240–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nannenga BL, Gonen T (2014) Protein structure determination by MicroED. Curr Opin Struct Biol 27:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nannenga BL, Shi D, Hattne J, Reyes FE, Gonen T (2014a) Structure of catalase determined by MicroED. eLife 3:e03600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nannenga BL, Shi D, Leslie AGW, Gonen T (2014b) High-resolution structure determination by continuous-rotation data collection in MicroED. Nat Methods 11:927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nannenga-Brent L, Iadanza-Matthew G, Vollmar-Breanna S, Gonen T (2013) Overview of electron crystallography of membrane proteins: crystallization and screening strategies using negative stain electron microscopy. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 72:17.15.1–17.15.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neutze R, Wouts R, van der Spoel D, Weckert E, Hajdu J (2000) Potential for biomolecular imaging with femtosecond X-ray pulses. Nature 406:752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parsons DF, Martius U (1964) Determination of the α-helix configuration of poly-γ-benzyl-l-glutamate by electron diffraction. J Mol Biol 10:530–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perutz MF, Rossmann MG, Cullis AF, Muirhead H, Will G, North AC (1960) Structure of haemoglobin: a three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 5.5-Å resolution, obtained by X-ray analysis. Nature 185:416–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rigort A, Bäuerlein FJB, Villa E, Eibauer M, Laugks T, Baumeister W, Plitzko JM (2012) Focused ion beam micromachining of eukaryotic cells for cryoelectron tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:4449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodriguez JA, Ivanova MI, Sawaya MR, Cascio D, Reyes FE, Shi D, Sangwan S, Guenther EL, Johnson LM, Zhang M, Jiang L, Arbing MA, Nannenga BL, Hattne J, Whitelegge J, Brewster AS, Messerschmidt M, Boutet S, Sauter NK, Gonen T, Eisenberg DS (2015) Structure of the toxic core of α-synuclein from invisible crystals. Nature 525:486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sawaya MR, Rodriguez J, Cascio D, Collazo MJ, Shi D, Reyes FE, Hattne J, Gonen T, Eisenberg DS (2016) Ab initio structure determination from prion nanocrystals at atomic resolution by MicroED. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:11232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shi D, Nannenga BL, Iadanza MG, Gonen T (2013) Three-dimensional electron crystallography of protein microcrystals. eLife 2:e01345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shian L, Hattne J, Reyes FE, Silvia SM, Jason de la Cruz MJ, Dan S, Tamir G (2017) Atomic resolution structure determination by the cryo-EM method MicroED. Protein Sci 26:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith JL, Fischetti RF, Yamamoto M (2012) Micro-crystallography comes of age. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22:602–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Strunk KM, Wang K, Ke D, Gray JL, Zhang P (2012) Thinning of large mammalian cells for cryo-TEM characterization by cryo-FIB milling. J Microsc 247:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suga M, Akita F, Sugahara M, Kubo M, Nakajima Y, Nakane T, Yamashita K, Umena Y, Nakabayashi M, Yamane T, Nakano T, Suzuki M, Masuda T, Inoue S, Kimura T, Nomura T, Yonekura S, Yu L-J, Sakamoto T, Motomura T, Chen J-H, Kato Y, Noguchi T, Tono K, Joti Y, Kameshima T, Hatsui T, Nango E, Tanaka R, Naitow H, Matsuura Y, Yamashita A, Yamamoto M, Nureki O, Yabashi M, Ishikawa T, Iwata S, Shen J-R (2017) Light-induced structural changes and the site of O=O bond formation in PSII caught by XFEL. Nature 543:131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang K, Strunk K, Zhao G, Gray JL, Zhang P (2012) 3D structure determination of native mammalian cells using cryo-FIB and cryo-electron tomography. J Struct Biol 180:318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yan R, Edwards TJ, Pankratz LM, Kuhn RJ, Lanman JK, Liu J, Jiang W (2015) Simultaneous determination of sample thickness, tilt, and electron mean free path using tomographic tilt images based on Beer-Lambert law. J Struct Biol 192:287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yonekura K, Kato K, Ogasawara M, Tomita M, Toyoshima C (2015) Electron crystallography of ultrathin 3D protein crystals: atomic model with charges. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:3368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang H, Unal H, Gati C, Han GW, Liu W, Zatsepin NA, James D, Wang D, Nelson G, Weierstall U, Sawaya MR, Xu Q, Messerschmidt M, Williams GJ, Boutet S, Yefanov OM, White TA, Wang C, Ishchenko A, Tirupula KC, Desnoyer R, Coe J, Conrad CE, Fromme P, Stevens RC, Katritch V, Karnik SS, Cherezov V (2015) Structure of the angiotensin receptor revealed by serial femtosecond crystallography. Cell 161:833–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang J, Ji G, Huang X, Xu W, Sun F (2016) An improved cryo-FIB method for fabrication of frozen hydrated lamella. J Struct Biol 194:218–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xinmei Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shuangbo Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jianguo Zhang
    • 3
  • Fei Sun
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of BiophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Center for Biological Imaging, Institute of BiophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations