Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Practice-Based Approach to Diagnose Pavement Roughness Problems

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pavement engineers are constantly trying to develop correlations between functional and structural indicators to develop best practices for pavement evaluation and make more informative maintenance and repair (M&R) decisions. This study aims to thoroughly investigate the interaction between the International Roughness Index (IRI), a standard index used to quantify the functional properties of a pavement, and various deflection-based parameters (DBPs) used to detect changes in the structural integrity of pavement. To achieve this goal, long-term pavement performance (LTPP) data from two different Pavements A and B are analyzed. The focus is to diagnose roughness problems detected on pavement surfaces by analyzing the predictability of DBPs based on IRI and pavement layer thickness. It is observed that two IRI values are at least needed to properly reflect the pavement profile condition; a median level and an upper level corresponding to the 90th percentile of a subsection’s IRI level. For Pavement A, the median IRI is considered a good predictor, with an R2 value of 0.71, of the Surface Curvature Index that reflects the condition of the asphalt layers, whereas for Pavement B, the upper IRI is considered a good predictor, with a lower R2 value of 0.65, of the deflection index that reflects the pavement’s substructure condition (i.e., the condition at higher depths). From a practical perspective, the interaction between roughness and individual DBPs can help engineers and practitioners better identify the potential origin depth of roughness problems and optimize pavement condition assessment strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pérez-Acebo H, Bejan S, Gonzalo-Orden H (2018) Transition probability matrices for flexible pavement deterioration models with half-year cycle time. Int J Civ Eng 16:1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0254-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fakhri M, Dezfoulian RS (2019) Pavement structural evaluation based on roughness and surface distress survey using neural network model. Constr Build Mater 204:768–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mubaraki M (2016) Highway subsurface assessment using pavement surface distress and roughness data. Int J Pavement Res Technol 9:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdelaziz N, Abd El-Hakim RT, El-Badawy SM, Afify HA (2020) International Roughness Index prediction model for flexible pavements. Int J Pavement Eng 21:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1441414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim RE, Kang S, Spencer BF, Al-Qadi IL, Ozer H (2019) Impact on pavement roughness and deflection on fuel consumption using energy dissipation. J Eng Mech 145:04019080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gkyrtis K, Loizos A, Plati C (2021) Integrating pavement sensing data for pavement condition evaluation. Sensors 21:3104. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093104

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Masaeid HR, Hani ZFB (2023) Effect of pavement roughness on arterial noise using different vehicle types. Int J Pavement Res Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-023-00324-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fares A, Zayed T (2023) Industry- and academic-based trends in pavement roughness inspection technologies over the past five decades: a critical review. Remote Sens 15:2941. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112941

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grygierek M, Sternik KJ (2021) Identification of pavement model parameters in the area of discontinuous surface deformation based on FWD tests. Int J Civ Eng 19:265–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00563-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saleh M (2016) Simplified approach for structural capacity evaluation of flexible pavements at the network level. Int J Pavement Eng 17:440–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.993202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffman MS (2003) Direct method for evaluating structural needs of flexible pavements with falling-weight deflectometer deflections. Transp Res Rec 1860:41–47. https://doi.org/10.3141/1860-05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sollazo G, Fwa TF, Bosurgi G (2017) An ANN model to correlate roughness and structural performance in asphalt pavements. Constr Build Mater 134:684–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karballaeezadeh N, Mohammadzadeh DS, Moazemi D, Band SS, Mosavi A, Reuter U (2020) Smart structural health monitoring of flexible pavements using machine learning methods. Coatings 10:1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10111100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Mansour AI, Shokri AA (2022) Correlation of pavement distress and roughness measurement. Appl Sci 12:3748. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu Z, Zhang Z, Abadie C (2013) Determining structural strength of existing asphalt layer using condition survey data. Int J Pavement Eng 14:603–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2012.677845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirbaş U (2018) IRI sensitivity to the influence of surface distress on flexible pavements. Coatings 8:271. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8080271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sholevar N, Golroo A, Esfahani SR (2022) Machine learning techniques for pavement condition evaluation. Autom Constr 136:104190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cano-Ortiz S, Pascual-Muñoz P, Castro-Fresno D (2022) Machine learning algorithms for monitoring pavement performance. Autom Constr 139:104309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haridas A, Peraka NSP, Biligiri KP (2022) Structural behavior prediction model for asphalt pavements: a deep neural network approach. J Test Eval 51:1021–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen X, Dong Q, Dong S (2022) Evaluation and prediction of pavement deflection parameters based on machine learning methods. Buildings 12:1928. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bayat R, Talatahari S, Gandomi AH, Habibi M, Aminnejad B (2023) Artificial neural networks for flexible pavement. Information 14:62. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14020062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xin J, Akiyama M, Frangopol DM (2023) Sustainability-informed management optimization of asphalt pavement considering risk evaluated by multiple performance indicators using deep neural networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 238:109448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gkyrtis K, Plati C, Loizos A (2022) Mechanistic analysis of asphalt pavements in support of pavement preservation decision-making. Infrastructures 7:61. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7050061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hosseini SA, Smadi O (2022) How prediction accuracy can affect the decision-making process in pavement management system. Infrastructures 6:28. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6020028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shohel Reza Amin M (2014) The pavement performance modeling: deterministic vs. stochastic approaches. In: Kadry S, El-Hami A (eds) Numerical methods for reliability and safety assessment. Springer, London, pp 179–196

    Google Scholar 

  26. Justo-Silva R, Ferreira A, Flintsch G (2021) Review on machine learning techniques for developing pavement performance prediction models. Sustainability 13:5248. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Horak E (2007) Surface moduli determined with the falling weight deflectometer used as benchmarking tool. In: Proceedings of the 26th Southern African transport conference: the challenges of implementing policy (SATC), July 9–12, 2007, Pretoria, South Africa, pp 284–293

  28. Hakim B, Brown SF (2006) Pavement analysis using the FWD: practical difficulties and proposed simplification. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on asphalt pavement, August 12–17, 2006, Quebec, Canada, vol 3, pp 59–68

  29. Losa M, Bacci R, Leandri P (2008) A statistical model for prediction of critical strains in pavements from deflection measurements. Road Mater Pavement Des 9:373–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2008.9690175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gkyrtis K, Armeni A, Loizos A (2022) A mechanistic perspective for airfield pavements evaluation focusing on the asphalt layers’ behaviour. Int J Pavement Eng 23:5087–5100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1995733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo S, Liu G, Zhuang B, Fan Y, Zheng Z (2021) Influence of freeze-thaw cycles on mechanical response of levee pavement. Adv Civ Eng 2021:6639303. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6639303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maser KR (1996) Condition assessment of transportation infrastructure using ground penetrating radar. J Infrastruct Syst 2:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:2(94)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Abaza KA (2023) Stochastic-based pavement rehabilitation model at the network level with prediction uncertainty considerations. Road Mater Pavement Des. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2022.2164330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang X, You Z, Hiller J, Watkins D (2017) Correlation analysis between temperature indices and flexible pavement distress predictions using mechanistic-empirical design. J Cold Reg Eng 31:04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao Q, Fan L, Wei S, Li Y, Du Y, Liu C (2023) Differences evaluation of pavement roughness distribution based on light detection and ranging data. Appl Sci 13:8080. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13148080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chandra S, Ravi Sekhar C, Kumar Bharti A, Kangadurai B (2013) Relationship between pavement roughness and distress parameters for Indian highways. J Transp Eng 139:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kakara S, Chowdary V (2020) Effect of pavement roughness and transverse slope on the magnitude of wheel loads. Arab J Sci Eng 45:4405–4418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04492-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Elnashar G, Bhat RB, Sedaghati R (2019) Modeling and dynamic analysis of a vehicle-flexible pavement coupled system subjected to road surface excitation. J Mech Sci Technol 33:3115–3125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0606-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bilodeau JP, Gagnon L, Doré G (2017) Assessment of the relationship between the international roughness index and dynamic loading of heavy vehicles. Int J Pavement Eng 18:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1121780

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (N.T.U.A.), Athens, Greece

    Christina Plati & Andreas Loizos

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace (D.U.Th.), Xanthi, Greece

    Konstantinos Gkyrtis

Authors
  1. Christina Plati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Konstantinos Gkyrtis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Loizos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: CP, KG, AL; methodology: CP, KG, AL; formal analysis and investigation: KG; writing—original draft preparation: KG; writing—review and editing: CP, KG, AL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Gkyrtis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plati, C., Gkyrtis, K. & Loizos, A. A Practice-Based Approach to Diagnose Pavement Roughness Problems. Int J Civ Eng 22, 453–465 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00900-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00900-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation