Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behaviour of Geocell Reinforcement in a Multi-Layered Flexible Pavement Under Repeated Loading

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively analyse the behaviour of geocell-reinforced pavement and discern the key factors affecting its performance through a combined approach of experimental and numerical analyses. It begins with full-scale model testing of reinforced and unreinforced sections, followed by numerical analysis conducted using the three-dimensional finite element program PLAXIS 3D. The numerical models were calibrated against the results obtained from the experimental study. The numerical investigation primarily focuses on evaluating how different parameters, including base material, diameter of wheel contact area, and subgrade conditions, impact the performance of geocell-reinforced pavement sections. The incorporation of geocells in the base layer has shown a marked reduction in both permanent deformation and concentration of subgrade pressure compared to unreinforced sections across all pavement sections. The rut depth reduction value is found to be influenced by the subgrade strength and the diameter of the wheel contact area. However, the study highlights a more significant decrease in rut depth and subgrade vertical stress in reinforced pavement sections constructed with a base material of fly ash compared to the sections with bases made of wet mix macadam (WMM) and sand materials. The study emphasizes fly ash as an optimal infill material choice, demonstrating minimal rut depth and lower pressure values at the subgrade level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

References

  1. Haas R, Walls J, Carroll RG (1988) Geogrid reinforcement of granular base in flexible pavements. In: 67th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA

  2. Leng J, Gabr MA (2005) Numerical analysis of stress—deformation response in reinforced unpaved road sections. Geosynthe Int 12:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2005.12.2.111

  3. Shahu JT (2007) Pullout response of inextensible sheet reinforcement subject to oblique end-force. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 133(11):1440–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patra S, Shahu JT (2012) Pasternak model for oblique pullout of inextensible reinforcement. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 138(12):1503–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shukla SK (2012) Handbook of geosynthetic engineering. ICE Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abu-Farsakh MY, Gu J, Voyiadjis GZ, Chen Q (2014) Mechanistic–empirical analysis of the results of finite element analysis on flexible pavement with geogrid base reinforcement. Int J Pavement Eng 15:786–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.893315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bagshaw SA, Herrington PR, Kathirgamanathan P, Cook SR (2015) Geosynthetics in basecourse stabilisation. NZ Transport Agency research report 574, p 64, ISBN 978-0-478-44577-0

  8. Bhowmik R, Shahu JT, Datta M (2018) Failure analysis of a geomembrane lined reservoir embankment. Geotext Geomembr 46(1):52–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhowmik R, Shahu JT, Datta M (2019) Experimental studies on inclined pullout behavior of geosynthetic sheet vis-à-vis geogrid—effect of type of anchor and sand. Geotext Geomembr 47(6):769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Banerjee S, Srivastava MVK, Manna B, Shahu JT (2022) A novel approach to the design of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavements. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 8:29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-022-00373-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chua BT, Hossam AN, Nepal KP (2022) Analysis and design of geogrid-reinforced unbound granular pavement over soft subgrade for low volume roads. Aust Geomech 57(1):25–41

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deshmukh R, Patel S, Shahu JT (2022) Full-scale field performance of geocell reinforced-fly ash in the subbase course of flexible pavement. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 8:36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-022-00383-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bathurst RJ, Karpurapu R (1993) Large-scale triaxial testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils. Geotech Test J 16:296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Latha GM, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2006) Experimental and theoretical investigations on geocell supported embankments. Int J Geomech 6(1):30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pokharel SK, Han J, Leshchinsky D, Parsons RL, Halahm I (2010) Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading. Geotext Geomembr 28(6):570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang X, Han J, Pokharel SK, Manandhar C, Parsons RL, Leshchinsky D, Halahmi I (2012) Accelerated pavement testing of unpaved roads with geocell-reinforced sand bases. Geotext Geomembr 32:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mamatha KH, Dinesh SV (2019) Performance evaluation of geocell-reinforced pavements. Int J Geotech Eng 13(3):277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghothi Siabil SG, Moghaddas Tafreshi SN, Dawson AR (2020) Response of pavement foundations incorporating both geocells and expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam. Geotext Geomembr 48(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheikh IR, Mandhaniya P, Shah MY (2021) A parametric study on pavement with geocell reinforced rock quarry waste base on dredged soil subgrade. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7:32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00275-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan MA, Puppala AJ (2023) Sustainable pavement with geocell reinforced reclaimed-asphalt-pavement (RAP) base layer. J Clean Prod 387:135802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gottumukkala B, Mehar B, Minchala D, Pulikanti SP, Kuna KK (2023) Laboratory and field evaluations of geocell reinforced bases for locally available material in the Himalayan region. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 9:74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pokharel SK, Han J, Leshchinsky D, Parsons RL (2018) Experimental evaluation of geocell reinforced bases under repeated loading. Int J Pavement Res Technol 11(2):114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. George AM, Banerjee A, Puppala AJ, Saladhi M (2021) Performance evaluation of geocell reinforced reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) bases in flexible pavements. Int J Pavement Eng 22(2):181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dash SK, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2007) Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading. Can Geotech J 44(7):905–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Latha GM, Somwanshi A (2009) Bearing capacity of square footings on geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 27(4):281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gedela R, Karpurapu R (2021) Laboratory and numerical studies on the performance of geocell reinforced base layer overlying soft subgrade. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00249-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Suku L, Prabhu SS, Ramesh P, Babu GLS (2016) Behavior of geocell-reinforced granular base under repeated loading. Transp Geotech 9(17–30):923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hegde A (2017) Geocell reinforced foundation beds-past findings, present trends and future 859 prospects: a state-of-the-art review. Constr Build Mater 154:658–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Banerjee S, Manna B, Shahu JT (2023) Geocell as a promising reinforcement technique for road pavement: a state of the art. Indian Geotech J:2277–3347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00818-0.

  30. ASTM D2487–17e1 (2017) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  31. ASTM D3080–04 (2004) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  32. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards) (2006) Determination of water content- dry density relation using heavy compaction. IS 2720 Part 8. New Delhi, India: BIS

  33. Pai RR, Bakare MD, Patel S, Shahu JT (2021) Structural evaluation of flexible pavement constructed with steel slag-fly ash-lime mix in the base layer. J Mater Civ Eng ASCE 33(6):04021097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. ASTM D 4595 (2009) Standard test method for Tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016. www.astm.org

  35. Selig ET, McKee KE (1961) Static and dynamic behaviour of small footings. J Soil Mech Found Division 87:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. IRC 37 (2018) Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. Indian Code of Practice, Indian Road Congress, New Delhi, India

  37. Plaxis BV (2023) PLAXIS 3D-Reference Manual. Delft. Plaxis, The Netherlands

  38. Bhowmik R, Shahu JT, Datta M (2020) Finite element modeling of geogrids in trenches under inclined pull. Int J Geomech 20:04020129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bowles JE (1997) Foundation analysis and design. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  40. Juneja G, Sharma RK (2023) Experimental and numerical analysis of geocell-reinforced base layer with different infill materials overlying clay. J Hazard Toxic Radioac Waste 27(4):04023024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cudny M, Truty A (2020) Refinement of the hardening soil model within the small strain range. Acta Geotechnica 15(8):2031–2051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00945-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kung GT-C, Ou C-Y, Juang CH (2009) Modeling small-strain behavior of Taipei clays for finite element analysis of braced excavations. Comput Geotech 36(1–2):304–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu C, Yan C, Zheng G, Liu T, Yang Y (2023) Field testing and numerical analysis of supporting performance of oblique piles used in pit excavation. Int J Geomech 23(11):1532–3641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sarkar R, Dawson AR (2017) Economic assessment of use of pond ash in pavements. Int J Pavement Eng 18(7):578–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1095915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Leshchinsky B, Ling H (2013) Effects of geocell confinement on strength and deformation behaviour of gravel. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(2):340–352. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2015) 3-Dimensional numerical analysis of geocell reinforced soft clay beds by considering the actual geometry of geocell pockets. Can Geotech J 52(9):1396–1407. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2015) 3-Dimensional numerical modelling of geocell reinforced sand beds. Geotext Geomembr 43(2):171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang X, Han J, Parsons LR, Leshchinsky D (2010) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of single geocell reinforced sand. Front Archit Civ Eng J 4(2):233–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0020-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Han J, Yang X, Leshchinsky D, Parsons RL (2008) Behaviour of geocell reinforced sand under a vertical load. J Transp Res Board 20(45):95–101. https://doi.org/10.3141/2045-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Dutta S, Mandal JN (2017) Numerical analyses on cellular mattress-reinforced fly ash beds overlying soft clay. Int J Geomech 17(4):04016095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Saride S, Rayabharapu VK, Suraj V (2015) Evaluation of rutting behaviour of geocell reinforced sand subgrades under repeated loading. Indian Geotech J 45(4):378–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Baadiga R, Balunaini U, Saride S, Madhav MR (2021) Influence of geogrid properties on rutting and stress distribution in reinforced flexible pavements under repetitive wheel loading. J Mater Civ Eng 33(12):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rajagopal K, Krishanaswamy NR, Latha GM (1999) Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotext Geomembr 17:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the "Performance Study of Geocell Reinforced Road Pavement at Dholera Activation Area" project sponsored by Dholera Industrial City Development Ltd., A Government of Gujarat Undertaking, under Sanction No. FT/05/299/2021.

Funding

Dholera Industrial City Development Ltd., A Government of Gujarat Undertaking, FT/05/299/2021, Bappaditya Manna

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India

    Sayanti Banerjee, Bappaditya Manna & J. T. Shahu

Authors
  1. Sayanti Banerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bappaditya Manna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. T. Shahu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SB: study conceptualization, methodology, numerical analysis, writing original draft, BM: study conceptualization, supervision, writing review and editing. JTS: supervision, writing review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sayanti Banerjee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banerjee, S., Manna, B. & Shahu, J.T. Behaviour of Geocell Reinforcement in a Multi-Layered Flexible Pavement Under Repeated Loading. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 10, 34 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-024-00541-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-024-00541-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation