Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frequency-Domain Analysis of Shock-Excited Magneto-Electro-Elastic Energy Harvesters with Different Unimorph and Bimorph Configurations

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bearing in mind that the environmental kinetic energy may be available in the form of shock pulse acceleration instead of the common harmonic type, this study investigates the response of unimorph and bimorph cantilever-based functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic energy harvesters under mechanical shock. Using Ritz's method together with the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, the reduced equations of motion are obtained. Then, neglecting the influence of the terms related to the magneto-electro-elastic layer and leading the gradient index to infinity, the present findings are compared and verified by those available in the literature. Afterward, given the fact that the frequency domain analysis provides a better physical understanding from a dynamical system, using the mass-spring shock spectrum diagram, the influence of shock duration on the values of the harvested power is investigated. Doing so, the optimal duration is determined. The results reveal that although employing the shock spectrum diagram associated with a mass-spring system can predict the optimal duration with relatively good accuracy, to have more accurate results, one should hire the shock spectrum diagram associated with the harvested power. Therefore, introducing the power spectrum diagram, a detailed parametric study is then performed to investigate the effects of the through-thickness material gradation index, the external coil and the piezoelectric circuit resistances as well as the harvester configurations. Finally, comparing the maximum harvested powers from functionally graded piezoelectric and magneto-electro-elastic harvesters, the advantages of using the present system are addressed. It is worth mentioning that the present work is the first attempt on providing a frequency-domain analysis for FGMEEM-based hybrid energy harvesters undergoing mechanical shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(\tilde{A}_{e}\) :

A coefficient that relates the piezoelectric voltage to the piezoelectric force resultant (Integral of the piezoelectric coefficient over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(\tilde{A}_{{g_{33} }}\) :

A coefficient that relates the magnetic field to the electric displacement resultant (Integral of the magneto-electric coefficient over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(\tilde{A}_{{h_{33} }}\) :

A coefficient that relates the electric field to the electric displacement resultant (Integral of the dielectric coefficient over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(\tilde{A}_{S}\) :

A coefficient that relates the membrane strain to the mechanical force resultant in the substrate (Integral of the modulus of elasticity over the cross section of the substrate)

\(\tilde{A}_{M}\) :

A coefficient that relates the membrane strain to the mechanical force resultant in the FGMEEM layer(s) (Integral of the modulus of elasticity over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(\tilde{A}_{m}\) :

A coefficient that relates the magnetic voltage to the magnetic force resultant (Integral of the piezomagnetic coefficient over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(\tilde{A}_{{\mu_{33} }}\) :

A coefficient that relates the magnetic field to the magnetic flux resultant (Integral of the magnetic permeability coefficient over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(\alpha\) :

A coefficient that distinguishes between the unimorph and bimorph cases in Eq. (6).

\(\eta\) :

Dimensionless form of the shock profile

\(\tilde{B}_{e}\) :

A coefficient that relates the piezoelectric voltage to the piezoelectric moment resultant (Integral of the multiplication of the piezoelectric coefficient by z over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(\tilde{B}_{S}\) :

A coefficient that relates the beam curvature to the mechanical force resultant in the substrate (Integral of the multiplication of the modulus of elasticity by z over the cross section of the substrate)

\(\tilde{B}_{M}\) :

A coefficient that relates the beam curvature to the mechanical force resultant in the FGMEEM layer(s) (Integral of the multiplication of the modulus of elasticity by z over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(\tilde{B}_{m}\) :

A coefficient that relates the piezomagnetic voltage to the piezomagnetic moment resultant (Integral of the multiplication of the piezomagnetic coefficient by z over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(B_{{\tilde{z}}}\) :

Magnetic flux

\(b\) :

Width of the beam

\(\beta\) :

A coefficient that distinguishes between the unimorph and bimorph cases in Eq. (13a).

\(C_{M}\) :

Modulus of elasticity of the FGMEEM

\(C_{S}\) :

Modulus of elasticity of the substrate

\(c_{t}\) :

Normalized damping coefficient

\(\tilde{c}_{{\tilde{t}}}\) :

Dimensional damping coefficient

\(c^{ * }\) :

The damping scale with which the damping is normalized

\(\tilde{D}_{S}\) :

A coefficient that relates the beam curvature to the mechanical moment resultant in the substrate (Integral of the multiplication of the modulus of elasticity by z2 over the cross section of the substrate)

\(\tilde{D}_{M}\) :

A coefficient that relates the beam curvature to the mechanical moment resultant in the FGMEEM later (Integral of the multiplication of the modulus of elasticity by z2 over the cross section(s) of the FGMEEM layer(s))

\(D_{{\tilde{z}}}\) :

Electric displacement

\(d_{i} \left( {i = 1 - 6} \right)\) :

Normalized coefficients in the reduced governing equation of motion associated with the transverse displacement

\(E_{{\hat{z}}}\) :

Electric field

\(e_{31}\) :

Piezoelectric coefficient

\(\varepsilon_{{\tilde{x}}}\) :

Axial strain

\(f_{31}\) :

Piezomagnetic coefficient

\(\phi_{E}\) :

Electric potential

\(\varphi_{i}\) :

iTh transversal approximating function in the Ritz procedure

\(\phi_{m}\) :

Magnetic potential

\(g_{33}\) :

Magneto-electric coefficient

\(\gamma\) :

A coefficient that distinguishes between the unimorph and bimorph cases in Eq. (20).

\(H_{{\hat{z}}}\) :

Magnetic field

\(h_{33}\) :

Dielectric coefficient

\(h_{i} \left( {i = 1 - 4} \right)\) :

Normalized coefficients in the reduced governing equation of motion associated with magnetic voltage

\(\tilde{I}_{0}\) :

Beam mass per unit length (Integral of the volume density over the cross section of the beam)

\(\tilde{I}_{1}\) :

The first moment of the beam inertia around the z-axis (Integral of the multiplication of the volume density by z over the cross section of the beam)

\(\tilde{I}_{2}\) :

The second moment of the beam inertia around the z-axis (Integral of the multiplication of the volume density by z2 over the cross section of the beam)

\(i_{M}\) :

Induced current

\(\tilde{K}\) :

Kinetic energy

\(k_{i} \left( {i = 1 - 4} \right)\) :

Normalized coefficients in the reduced governing equation of motion associated with the piezoelectric voltage

\(L\) :

Length of the beam

\(\lambda\) :

The smallest positive root of the characteristic equation associated with linear undamped mode-shapes of a cantilever beam

\(M_{{{\text{tip}}}}\) :

Normalized tip mass

\(\tilde{M}_{{{\text{tip}}}}\) :

Tip mass

\(M_{{\tilde{x}}}\) :

Mechanical moment resultant

\(M_{{\tilde{x}}}^{m}\) :

Piezomagnetic moment resultant

\(M_{{\tilde{x}}}^{p}\) :

Piezoelectric moment resultant

\(M^{ * }\) :

The mass scale with which the tip mass is normalized.

\(\mu_{33}\) :

Magnetic permeability coefficient

\(N\) :

Turn number of the coil(s)

\(N_{{\tilde{x}}}\) :

Mechanical force resultant

\(N_{{\tilde{x}}}^{m}\) :

Piezomagnetic force resultant

\(N_{{\tilde{x}}}^{p}\) :

Piezoelectric force resultant

\(n\) :

Power law index

\(\omega_{{{\text{sh}}}}\) :

Normalized shock frequency

\(\tilde{\omega }_{{{\text{sh}}}}\) :

Shock frequency

\(R_{m}\) :

External coil resistance

\(R_{p}\) :

Piezoelectric circuit resistance

\(\Re\) :

This parameter refers to any property of the FGMEEM such as its modulus of elasticity, Poison’s ration or its density.

\(\Re_{M}\) :

This parameter refers to any property of the MEE material such as its modulus of elasticity, Poison’s ration or its density.

\(\Re_{S}\) :

This parameter refers to any property of the material from which the substrate is made such as its modulus of elasticity, Poison’s ration or its density.

\(\rho_{M}\) :

Volume density of the FGMEEM

\(\rho_{S}\) :

Volume density of the material from which the substrate is made

\(s_{i} \left( {i = 1 - 4} \right)\) :

Normalized coefficients in the reduced governing equation of motion associated with the axial displacement

\(\psi\) :

The First mode shape of the cantilever beam

\(\sigma_{{\tilde{x}}}^{M}\) :

Axial stress in the FGMEEM layer

\(\sigma_{{\tilde{x}}}^{S}\) :

Axial stress in the substrate layer

\(T\) :

The time scale with which the time is normalized.

\(T_{{{\text{sh}}}}\) :

Normalized shock duration

\(\tilde{T}_{{{\text{sh}}}}\) :

Shock duration

\(t\) :

Normalized time

\(\tilde{t}\) :

Time

\(t_{M}\) :

Thickness of the FGMEEM layer

\(t_{S}\) :

Thickness of the substrate layer

\(U\) :

Unit step function

\(\tilde{U}\) :

Strain energy

\(\tilde{U}_{e}\) :

Electric energy

\(\tilde{U}_{m}\) :

Magnetic energy

\(u\) :

Normalized axial displacement of a point located on the beam mid-surface

\(\tilde{u}\) :

Axial displacement of a point located on the beam mid-surface

\(\tilde{u}_{{{\text{tip}}}}\) :

Axial displacement of a point located on the beam mid-surface associated with the beam tip mass

\(V_{m}\) :

Normalized magnetic voltage

\(\tilde{V}_{m}\) :

Magnetic voltage

\(V_{p}\) :

Normalized piezoelectric voltage

\(\tilde{V}_{p}\) :

Piezoelectric voltage

\(V_{m}^{ * }\) :

The voltage scale with which the magnetic voltage is normalized

\(V_{p}^{ * }\) :

The voltage scale with which the piezoelectric voltage is normalized.

\(\upnu _{M}\) :

Volume fraction of the FGMEEM

\(\upnu _{S}\) :

Volume fraction of the material from which the substrate is made

\({V}\) :

Volume of the beam

\({V}_{M}\) :

Volume of FGMEEM layer(s)

\({V}_{S}\) :

Volume of substrate layer

\(\delta\) :

Variational operator

\(w\) :

Normalized beam deflection

\(\,\tilde{w}\) :

Beam deflection

\(\tilde{w}_{{{\text{tip}}}}\) :

Deflection of the tip mass

\(\tilde{w}_{{{\text{tot}}}}\) :

Total displacement of the beam in the transverse direction

\(x\) :

Normalized coordinate along the length of the beam

\(\tilde{x}\) :

Coordinate along the length of the beam

\(\tilde{z}\) :

Coordinate along the beam thickness

\(\tilde{\mathbb{Z}}\) :

Base acceleration

\(\tilde{\mathbb{Z}}_{0}\) :

Amplitude of the base acceleration

References

  • Alsaleem FM, Younis MI, Ibrahim MI (2009) A study for the effect of the PCB motion on the dynamics of MEMS devices under mechanical shock. J Microelectromech Syst 18:597–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Amini Y, Emdad H, Farid M (2015) Finite element modeling of functionally graded piezoelectric harvesters. Compos Struct 129:165–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Amini Y, Fatehi P, Heshmati M, Parandvar H (2016) Time domain and frequency domain analysis of functionally graded piezoelectric harvesters subjected to random vibration: Finite element modeling. Compos Struct 136:384–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Andò B, Baglio S, Maiorca F, Trigona C (2013) Analysis of two dimensional, wide-band, bistable vibration energy harvester. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 202:176–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Askari AR, Lenci S (2021) Size-dependent response of electrically pre-deformed micro-plates under mechanical shock incorporating the effect of packaging, a frequency-domain analysis. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 43:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Askari AR, Tahani M (2014) An alternative reduced order model for electrically actuated micro-beams under mechanical shock. Mech Res Commun 57:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Askari AR, Tahani M (2018) Dynamic analysis of rectangular micro-plates under mechanical shock in presence of electrostatic actuation. Sens Imag 19:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Askari AR, Tahani M, Moeenfard H (2017) A frequency criterion for doubly clamped beam-type N/MEMS subjected to the van der Waals attraction. Appl Math Model 41:650–666

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borowiec M, Litak G, Friswell M, Ali S, Adhikari S, Lees A, Bilgen O (2013) Energy harvesting in piezoelastic systems driven by random excitations. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 13:1340006

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang T-P (2013) Deterministic and random vibration analysis of fluid-contacting transversely isotropic magneto-electro-elastic plates. Comput Fluids 84:247–254

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Coey JMD (2010) Magnetism and magnetic materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Derayatifar M, Sedaghati R, Chandramohan S, Packirisamy M, Bhat R (2021) Dynamic analysis of a functionally graded piezoelectric energy harvester under magnetic interaction. J Intel Mat Syst Str 32:986–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Derayatifar M, Tahani M, Moeenfard H (2017) Nonlinear analysis of functionally graded piezoelectric energy harvesters. Compos Struct 182:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Erturk A, Inman DJ (2011) Piezoelectric energy harvesting. Wiley, Hobroken

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadi A, Tadi Beni Y, Golestanian H (2019) Size dependent thermo-electro-mechanical nonlinear bending analysis of flexoelectric nano-plate in the presence of magnetic field. Int J Mech Sci 152:118–137

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadi A, Tadi Beni Y, Golestanian H (2020) Nonlinear thermo-electromechanical vibration analysis of size-dependent functionally graded flexoelectric nano-plate exposed magnetic field. Arch Appl Mech 90:2025–2070

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadi A, Tadi Beni Y, Żur KK (2021) Porosity distribution effect on stress, electric field and nonlinear vibration of functionally graded nanostructures with direct and inverse flexoelectric phenomenon. Compos Struct 259:113220

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano S (2014) Explicit nonlinear homogenization for magneto-electro-elastic laminated materials. Mech Res Commun 55:18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibi B, Tadi Beni Y, Mehralian F (2019) Free vibration of magneto-electro-elastic nanobeams based on modified couple stress theory in thermal environment. Mech Adv Mater Struct 26:601–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadas Z, Vetiska V, Singule V, Andrs O, Kovar J, Vetiska J (2012) Energy harvesting from mechanical shocks using a sensitive vibration energy harvester. Int J Adv Robot Sys 9:225

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday D, Resnick R, Krane KS (2010) Physics, vol 2. Wiley, Hobroken

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi R (2016) Magneto-electro-elastic properties of multiferroic composites containing periodic distribution of general multi-coated inhomogeneities. Int J Eng Sci 103:59–76

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Liu S (2022) A magnetoelectric energy harvester for low-frequency vibrations and human walking. J Magn Magn Mater 542:168609

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph GV, Hao G, Pakrashi V (2018) Extreme value estimates using vibration energy harvesting. J Sound Vib 437:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Karami MA, Inman DJ (2011) Equivalent damping and frequency change for linear and nonlinear hybrid vibrational energy harvesting systems. J Sound Vib 330:5583–5597

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimipour I, Tadi Beni Y (2022) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of nonlocal composite laminated toroidal shell segments subjected to mechanical shock. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 106:106105

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HS, Kim J-H, Kim J (2011) A review of piezoelectric energy harvesting based on vibration. Int J Precis Eng Man 12:1129–1141

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi M (1993) The concept of FGM. Ceram Trans 34:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Boyd JG IV, Lagoudas DC (2005) Effective properties of three-phase electro-magneto-elastic composites. Int J Eng Sci 43:790–825

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li JY, Dunn ML (1998) Micromechanics of magnetoelectroelastic composite materials: average fields and effective behavior. J Intel Mat Syst Str 9:404–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ding H, Chen W (2008) Three-dimensional analytical solution for functionally graded magneto–electro-elastic circular plates subjected to uniform load. Compos Struct 83:381–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, He Y, Zhang B, Lei J, Guo S, Liu D (2019) Experimental investigation and theoretical modelling on nonlinear dynamics of cantilevered microbeams. Eur J Mech A/Solids 78:103834

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Zhu R, Yu F, Jiang X, Liu Z, Dong L, Hua Q, Ou Z (2021) Gear rotational speed sensor based on FeCoSiB/Pb (Zr, Ti) O3 magnetoelectric composite. J Int Measur Confed 168:108409

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Ke L-L, Wang Y-S (2015) Sliding frictional contact of functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic materials under a conducting flat punch. J Appl Mech. https://doi.org/10.1115/14029090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meirovitch L, Parker R (2001) Fundamentals of vibrations. Appl Mech Rev 54:100–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeenfard H, Awtar S (2014) Modeling geometric nonlinearities in the free vibration of a planar beam flexure with a tip mass. J Mech Design 136:044502

    Google Scholar 

  • Majdi MA, Tahani M, Askari AR (2019) Size-dependent pull-in instability analysis of electrically actuated packaged FG micro-cantilevers under the effect of mechanical shock. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 41(1):16

    Google Scholar 

  • Narita F, Fox M (2018) A review on piezoelectric, magnetostrictive, and magnetoelectric materials and device technologies for energy harvesting applications. Adv Eng Mater 20:1700743

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayfeh AH, Mook DT (2008) Nonlinear oscillations. Wiley, Hobroken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramini AH, Younis MI, Miles R (2011) Modeling the effects of the PCB motion on the response of microstructures under mechanical shock. J Vib Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1115/14005219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao SS (2019) Vibration of continuous systems. Wiley, Hobroken

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy J (2010) Nonlocal nonlinear formulations for bending of classical and shear deformation theories of beams and plates. Int J Eng Sci 48:1507–1518

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy J (2011) Microstructure-dependent couple stress theories of functionally graded beams. J Mech Phys Solids 59:2382–2399

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy JN (2017) Energy principles and variational methods in applied mechanics. Wiley, Hobroken

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekik M, El-Borgi S, Ounaies Z (2014) An axisymmetric problem of an embedded mixed-mode crack in a functionally graded magnetoelectroelastic infinite medium. Appl Math Model 38:1193–1210

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roundy S, Wright PK, Rabaey JM (2003) Energy scavenging for wireless sensor networks. Springer, Belin

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Yao H, Gao Y-W (2017) A functionally graded composite cantilever to harvest energy from magnetic field. J Alloys Compd 693:989–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirbani MM, Shishesaz M, Hajnayeb A, Sedighi HM (2017) Coupled magneto-electro-mechanical lumped parameter model for a novel vibration-based magneto-electro-elastic energy harvesting systems. Physica E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct 90:158–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishesaz M, Shirbani MM, Sedighi HM, Hajnayeb A (2018) Design and analytical modeling of magneto-electro-mechanical characteristics of a novel magneto-electro-elastic vibration-based energy harvesting system. J Sound Vib 425:149–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Singh I (2021) Extended isogeometric analysis for fracture in functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic material. Eng Fract Mech 247:107640

    Google Scholar 

  • Suresh S, Mortensen A (1998) Fundamentals of functionally graded materials. The Institut of Materials

  • Tahani M, Batra RC, Askari AR (2015) Size-dependent free vibrations of electrostatically predeformed functionally graded micro-cantilevers. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/87/1/012117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaezi M, Shirbani MM, Hajnayeb A (2016) Free vibration analysis of magneto-electro-elastic microbeams subjected to magneto-electric loads. Physica E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct 75:280–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Suchtelen J (1972) Product properties: a new application of composite materials. Philips Res Rep 27:28–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Wen Y, Li P (2011) Magnetoelectric energy harvesting from vibrations of multiple frequencies. J Intel Mat Syst Str 22:1631–1639

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylli K, Hoffmann D, Willmann A, Becker P, Folkmer B, Manoli Y (2015) Energy harvesting from human motion: exploiting swing and shock excitations. Smart Mater Struct 24:025029

    Google Scholar 

  • Younis MI, Alsaleem F, Jordy D (2007a) The response of clamped–clamped microbeams under mechanical shock. Int J Non Linear Mech 42:643–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Younis MI, Alsaleem FM, Miles R, Su Q (2007b) Characterization of the performance of capacitive switches activated by mechanical shock. J Micromech Microeng 17:1360

    Google Scholar 

  • Younis MI, Jordy D, Pitarresi JM (2007c) Computationally efficient approaches to characterize the dynamic response of microstructures under mechanical shock. J Micromech Microeng 16:628–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Younis MI, Miles R, Jordy D (2006) Investigation of the response of microstructures under the combined effect of mechanical shock and electrostatic forces. J Micromech Microeng 16:2463

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheri Abdehvand M, Seyed Roknizadeh SA, Mohammad-Sedighi H (2021) Parametric study of a novel magneto-electro-aeroelastic energy harvesting system. Proc Inst Mech Eng L P I MECH ENG L-J MAT 235:14644207211020776

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Chen J, Zhang Z, Sun M, Yu Y, Wang J, Cai S (2022a) Analysis of magnetorheological clutch with double cup-shaped gap excited by Halbach array based on finite element method and experiment. Smart Mater Struct 31:075008

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Zhang Z, Sun M, Yu Y, Wang J, Cai S (2022b) The influence of the temperature on the dynamic behaviors of magnetorheological gel. Adv Eng Mater 24:2101680

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R, Dai H, Yao H (2022) Liquid-metal magnetic soft robot with reprogrammable magnetization and stiffness. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 7:4535–4541

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Xu C, Lu C, Jiang X, Zhang Z, Wang J, Xiao X, Xin M, Wang L (2021) Investigation of transient magnetoelectric response of magnetostrictive/piezoelectric composite applicable for lightning current sensing. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 329:112789

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir R. Askari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Appendix

Appendix

The dimensionless coefficients associated with the reduced equations of motion given in (26) for each configuration are given in this section. The coefficients \(d_{i} = \frac{{c_{i + 1} }}{{c_{1} }}\)\(\left( {i = 1,2,... \, 6} \right)\). Also, the coefficients \(c_{i} \left( {i = 1 - 7} \right)\), \(s_{i} \left( {i = 1 - 4} \right)\), \(k_{i} \left( {i = 1 - 4} \right)\) and \(h_{i} \left( {i = 1 - 4} \right)\) for the unimorph layout are given in Eqs. (30). These quantities for the bimorph configuration are also given in Eqs. (31).

$$\begin{gathered} c_{1} = - \frac{{\tilde{I}_{2} L^{2} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{{\prime}{2}} } dx - \frac{{\tilde{I}_{0} L^{4} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{2} dx} - \left[ {\frac{{M^{ * } M_{{{\text{tip}}}} L^{2} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\left( {\psi^{2} } \right)} \right]_{x = 1} , \, c_{2} = - \frac{{c_{t} c^{ * } L^{2} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T}}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{2} dx} , \hfill \\ \, \hfill \\ c_{3} = \frac{{\left( {\tilde{B}_{M} + \tilde{B}_{S} } \right)\tilde{B}_{M} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} \left( {\tilde{A}_{S} + \tilde{A}_{M} } \right)}}\int_{0}^{1} {\left( {\psi^{\prime\prime}} \right)^{2} dx} - \frac{{\left( {\tilde{D}_{M} + \tilde{D}_{S} } \right)}}{{\tilde{D}_{S} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\left( {\psi^{\prime\prime}} \right)^{2} dx} + \frac{{\left( {\tilde{B}_{M} + \tilde{B}_{S} } \right)\tilde{B}_{M} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} \left( {\tilde{A}_{S} + \tilde{A}_{M} } \right)}}\left( {\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}dx} } \right)^{2} ,\, \hfill \\ c_{4} = \frac{{\left( {\tilde{B}_{M} + \tilde{B}_{S} } \right)L}}{{\tilde{D}_{S} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}dx} , \, c_{5} = \frac{{\tilde{B}_{e} V_{p}^{ * } L}}{{t_{M} \tilde{D}_{S} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}dx} ,\,\,\,c_{6} = - \frac{{\tilde{B}_{m} NV_{m}^{ * } L}}{{R_{m} t_{M} \tilde{D}_{S} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}dx} , \hfill \\ c_{7} = {\mathbb{Z}}_{0} \left( { - \frac{{\tilde{I}_{0} L^{4} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi dx} - \left[ {\frac{{M^{ * } M_{{{\text{tip}}}} L^{2} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\left( \psi \right)} \right]_{x = 1} } \right), \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
(30a)
$$s_{1} = \frac{{T^{2} \left( {\tilde{A}_{S} + \tilde{A}_{M} } \right)}}{{M^{ * } M_{{{\text{tip}}}} }},\,\,s_{2} = \frac{{T^{2} \tilde{B}_{M} \int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}dx} }}{{M^{ * } LM_{{{\text{tip}}}} }},\,\,s_{3} = \frac{{T^{2} \tilde{A}_{e} V_{p}^{ * } }}{{M^{ * } t_{M} M_{{{\text{tip}}}} }},s_{4} = \frac{{T^{2} \tilde{A}_{m} NV_{m}^{ * } }}{{M^{ * } R_{m} t_{M} M_{{{\text{tip}}}} }},$$
(30b)
$$k_{1} = \frac{{t_{M} \tilde{A}_{e} }}{{\tilde{A}_{{h_{33} }} V_{p}^{ * } }},\,\,k_{2} = \frac{{t_{M} \tilde{B}_{e} \int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}dx} }}{{\tilde{A}_{{h_{33} }} LV_{p}^{ * } }},\,\,k_{3} = \frac{{ - \tilde{A}_{{g_{33} }} NV_{m}^{ * } }}{{R_{m} \tilde{A}_{{h_{33} }} V_{p}^{ * } }},\,\,k_{4} = \frac{{\left( {t_{M} } \right)^{2} T}}{{R_{e} \tilde{A}_{{h_{33} }} L}},$$
(30c)
$$h_{1} = \frac{{R_{m} t_{M} \tilde{A}_{m} }}{{N\tilde{A}_{{\mu_{33} }} V_{m}^{ * } }},\,h_{2} = \frac{{ - R_{m} t_{M} \tilde{B}_{m} \int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}} dx}}{{N\tilde{A}_{{\mu_{33} }} LV_{m}^{ * } }},\,\,h_{3} = \frac{{ - R_{m} \tilde{A}_{{g_{33} }} V_{p}^{ * } }}{{N\tilde{A}_{{\mu_{33} }} V_{m}^{ * } }},\,\,h_{4} = \frac{{R_{m} \left( {t_{M} } \right)^{2} T}}{{N^{2} \tilde{A}_{{\mu_{33} }} L^{2} }}.$$
(30d)
$$\begin{gathered} c_{1} = - \frac{{\tilde{I}_{2} L^{2} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{{\prime}{2}} } dx - \frac{{\tilde{I}_{0} L^{4} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{2} dx} - \left[ {\frac{{M^{ * } M_{{{\text{tip}}}} L^{2} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\left( {\psi^{2} } \right)} \right]_{x = 1} , \, c_{2} = - \frac{{c_{t} c^{ * } L^{2} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T}}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{2} dx} , \hfill \\ c_{3} = - \frac{{\left( {\tilde{D}_{M} + \tilde{D}_{S} } \right)}}{{\tilde{D}_{S} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\left( {\psi^{\prime\prime}} \right)^{2} dx} ,\, \, c_{4} = 0, \, c_{5} = \frac{{\tilde{B}_{e} V_{p}^{ * } L}}{{2t_{M} \tilde{D}_{S} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}dx} , \hfill \\ c_{6} = - \frac{{\tilde{B}_{m} NV_{m}^{ * } L}}{{R_{m} t_{M} \tilde{D}_{S} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}dx} , \, c_{7} = {\mathbb{Z}}_{0} \left( { - \frac{{\tilde{I}_{0} L^{4} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\int_{0}^{1} {\psi dx} - \left[ {\frac{{M^{ * } M_{{{\text{tip}}}} L^{2} }}{{\tilde{D}_{S} T^{2} }}\left( \psi \right)} \right]_{x = 1} } \right), \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
(31a)
$$s_{1} = \frac{{T^{2} \left( {\tilde{A}_{S} + \tilde{A}_{M} } \right)}}{{M^{ * } M_{{{\text{tip}}}} }},\,\,s_{2} = 0,\,\,s_{3} = 0,s_{4} = 0,$$
(31b)
$$k_{1} = 0,\,\,k_{2} = \frac{{2t_{M} \tilde{B}_{e} \int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}dx} }}{{\tilde{A}_{{h_{33} }} LV_{p}^{ * } }},\,\,k_{3} = \frac{{ - 2\tilde{A}_{{g_{33} }} NV_{m}^{ * } }}{{R_{m} \tilde{A}_{{h_{33} }} V_{p}^{ * } }},\,\,k_{4} = \frac{{4\left( {t_{M} } \right)^{2} T}}{{R_{e} \tilde{A}_{{h_{33} }} L}},$$
(31c)
$$h_{1} = 0,\, \, h_{2} = \frac{{ - R_{m} t_{M} \tilde{B}_{m} \int_{0}^{1} {\psi^{\prime\prime}} dx}}{{N\tilde{A}_{{\mu_{33} }} LV_{m}^{ * } }},\, \, h_{3} = \frac{{ - R_{m} \tilde{A}_{{g_{33} }} V_{p}^{ * } }}{{2N\tilde{A}_{{\mu_{33} }} V_{m}^{ * } }},\,\,h_{4} = \frac{{2R_{m} \left( {t_{M} } \right)^{2} T}}{{N^{2} \tilde{A}_{{\mu_{33} }} L^{2} }}.$$
(31d)

where \(\tilde{I}_{0}\), \(\tilde{I}_{1}\) and \(\tilde{I}_{2}\) for the unimorph configuration are given in Eqs. (32). These quantities for the case of a system with a bimorph layout are also given in Eqs. (33).

$$\left[ {\tilde{I}_{0} ,\tilde{I}_{1} ,\tilde{I}_{2} } \right] = b\left( {\int_{{\frac{{ - \left( {t_{S} + t_{M} } \right)}}{2}}}^{{\frac{{\left( {t_{S} - t_{M} } \right)}}{2}}} {\rho_{S} \left\{ {\left. {1,\tilde{z},\tilde{z}^{2} } \right\}} \right.d\tilde{z}} + \int_{{\frac{{\left( {t_{S} - t_{M} } \right)}}{2}}}^{{\frac{{\left( {t_{S} + t_{M} } \right)}}{2}}} {\rho_{M} \left\{ {\left. {1,\tilde{z},\tilde{z}^{2} } \right\}} \right.d\tilde{z}} } \right),$$
(32)
$$\left[ {\tilde{I}_{0} ,\tilde{I}_{1} ,\tilde{I}_{2} } \right] = b\left( {\int_{{ - t_{M} - \frac{{t_{S} }}{2}}}^{{ - \frac{{t_{S} }}{2}}} {\rho_{M} \left\{ {\left. {1,\tilde{z},\tilde{z}^{2} } \right\}} \right.d\tilde{z}} + \int_{{\frac{{ - t_{S} }}{2}}}^{{\frac{{t_{S} }}{2}}} {\rho_{S} \left\{ {\left. {1,\tilde{z},\tilde{z}^{2} } \right\}} \right.d\tilde{z}} + \int_{{\frac{{t_{S} }}{2}}}^{{t_{M} + \frac{{t_{S} }}{2}}} {\rho_{M} \left\{ {\left. {1,\tilde{z},\tilde{z}^{2} } \right\}} \right.d\tilde{z}} } \right).$$
(33)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khaghanifard, J., Askari, A.R. & Taghizadeh, M. Frequency-Domain Analysis of Shock-Excited Magneto-Electro-Elastic Energy Harvesters with Different Unimorph and Bimorph Configurations. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 47, 1205–1222 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00575-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00575-0

Keywords

Navigation