Skip to main content
Log in

Approximation of Strain Rate Parameters for Use with Eulerian Viscoplastic Constitutive Models Based on True Cauchy Stresses and True Strains Obtained at Nominal Strain Rates

  • Applications Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In several previous studies, strain rate sensitivity parameters are given for universal stress strain curves for true Cauchy stress and true (logarithmic) strain data; however, the required true strain rate was approximated using nominal (engineering) strain rate. The problem with this is that for finite viscoplastic deformations, both Eulerien and Lagrangian variables are being combined within the proposed viscoplasic constitutive models which makes the models inconsistent with the exact equations of motion, and required deformation power requirements. To be consistent, it is required that the true Cauchy stress be the work energy conjugate to the true strain measure whose rate is the rate of deformation tensor along with the current density per current unit volume. Therefore, in this study, the objective is to illustrate the difference associated with using the strain rate sensitivity constants from true stress versus true strain data obtained at several nominal axial strain rates with the true axial rates of deformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Song B, Chen W, Antoun BR, Frew DJ (2007) Determination of early flow stress for ductile specimens at high strain rates by using a SHPB. Exp Mech 47:671–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2002) Pulse shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Exp Mech 42:93–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2005) Pulse shaping techniques for testing elastic-plastic materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Exp Mech 45:186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lubliner J (1990) Plasticity Theory. Macmillan Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Warren TL, Forrestal MJ (1998) Effects of strain hardening and strain rate sensitivity on the penetration of aluminum targets with spherical-nosed rods. Int J Solids Struct 35:3737–3753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Piekutowski AJ, Forrestal MJ, Poormon KL, Warren TL (1999) Penetration of 6061–T6511 Aluninum targets by ogive-nose steel projectiles with striking velocities between 0.5 and 3.0 km/s. Int J Impact Eng 23:723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hopkins HG (1960) Dynamic expansion of spherical cavities in metals. progress in solid mecanics, vol 1, 1st edn. Sneddon and R Hill, New York, pp 85–164

    Google Scholar 

  8. Warren TL, Tabbara MR (2000) Simulations of the penetration of 6061–T6511 aluminum targets by spherical-nosed VAR 4340 steel projectiles. Int J Solids Struct 37:4419–4435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Warren TL, Poormon KL (2001) Penetration of 6061–T6511 aluminum targets by ogive-nosed VAR 4340 steel projectiles at oblique angles: experiments and simulations. Int J Impact Eng 25:993–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peirce D, Shih CF, Needleman A (1984) A tangent modulus method for rate dependent solids. Comp and Struct 18(5):875–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Warren TL (2002) Simulations of the penetration of limestone targets by ogive–nose 4340 steel projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 27:475–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Warren TL, Hanchak SJ, Poormon KL (2004) Penetration of limestone targets by ogive-nosed VAR 4340 steel projectiles at oblique angles: experiments and simulations. Int J Impact Eng 30:1307–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor LM, Flanagan DP (1998) PRONTO 3D a three dimensional transient solid dynamics program. SAND87–1912. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ramesh KT, Narasimhan S (1996) Finite deformations and the dynamic measurement of radial strains in compression kolsky bar experiments. Int J Solids Struct 33(25):3723–3738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee EH (1969) Elastic-plastic deformation at finite strains. ASME J Appl Mech 36:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yadav S, Chichili DR, Ramesh KT (1995) The mechanical response of a 6061–T6 Al/Al2O3 metal matrix at high rates of deformation. Acta Metall Mater 43(12):4453–4464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. OxfordUniversityPress, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luk V, Forrestal MJ, Amos DE (1991) Dynamic spherical cavity-expansion of strain-hardening materials. ASME J Appl Mech 58:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Forrestal MJ, Piekutowski AJ (2000) Penetration experiments with 6061–T6511 aluminum targets and spherical-nose steel projectiles at striking velocities between 05 and 30 km/s. Int J Impact Engng 24:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

N/A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. L. Warren.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work done in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warren, T.L. Approximation of Strain Rate Parameters for Use with Eulerian Viscoplastic Constitutive Models Based on True Cauchy Stresses and True Strains Obtained at Nominal Strain Rates. J. dynamic behavior mater. 10, 98–110 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-023-00394-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-023-00394-7

Keywords

Navigation