Abstract
Private tutoring is widespread in India, and its demand is growing over time. In this paper, we employ a two-step Heckman selection model to analyse the role of socioeconomic and school-related factors in determining household demand for private tutoring in secondary education in India. We use 75th education round data of the National Statistical Office (NSO), a pan-India household survey data collected between July 2017 and June 2018. We find that around 29 per cent of secondary school-going children in India attend private tutoring, the highest among all levels of education. Results show that students from socially and economically disadvantaged families are under-represented in private tutoring and spend less on it than their less-disadvantaged counterparts. We also find significant regional (rural/urban) and inter-state variations in participation and household investment in private tutoring in India. Our results indicate that children from science and commerce streams have a higher demand for private tuition than their arts stream counterparts. In a context where ‘coaching culture’ is increasingly visible in secondary education in India, findings of this paper propose potential policy implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
This study is based on a national survey conducted by National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) from July 2017 to June 2018, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. The data are publicly available at: https://www.mospi.gov.in/web/mospi/download-tables-data/-/reports/view/templateTwo/16203?q=TBDCAT
Notes
The term ‘Shadow Education’ is used for after-school private supplementary coaching services that are fee-based and are offered to students outside the mainstream school education system (Bray and Lykins 2012).
JEE is conducted for admission to Undergraduate Engineering Programs (B.E/B.Tech.) at NITs, IIITs, other Centrally Funded Technical Institutions (CFTIs), and Institutions/Universities funded/recognised by participating State Governments.
NEET is a pan-India entrance examination for admission to undergraduate medical courses like MBBS/BDS/BAMS/BSMS/BUMS/BHMS in approved/recognised Medical/Dental/AYUSH and other Colleges/ Deemed Universities/Institutes in India.
In our sample, nearly two-thirds (63 per cent) of the students were pursuing secondary schooling in non-English medium (Hindi or other regional languages) and 37 per cent in English medium. Our premise is that medium of instruction in schools is an important determinant for a household’s decision to send their offspring for private tuition. For instance, students from non-English medium of instruction may opt for more private tuition to bridge any learning gaps that may arise due to the limitations of the school's medium of instruction. However, the second decision (how much to spend on private coaching) is more determined by the household’s capacity to pay and choice of the tutor and the fee charged by them. Bray and Lykins (2012) find that rural and poor school children who struggled with learning English in India led to a rise in private tutoring in the country. In Pakistan, the strongest demand for supplementary tutoring is in English, particularly among children who study in non-English mediums (Parveen et al. 2022).
Secondary education in India comprises four grades (9 to 12), 9 and 10 as secondary and 11 and 12 as senior/higher secondary.
References
Alam MB, Zhu Z (2021) Private tutoring in Bangladesh: Evolution, expansion, and policy responses. Int J Comp Educ Dev 24(1):20–36
Alcott B, Rose P (2015) Schools and learning in rural India and Pakistan: Who goes where, and how much are they learning? Prospects 45:345–363
Aslam M, Atherton P (2012) The shadow education sector in India and Pakistan: the determinants, benefits, and equity effects of private tutoring. Working paper series, 38, Education support programme
Azam M (2016) Private tutoring: evidence from India. Rev Dev Econ 20(4):739–761
Azam M, Kingdon GG (2013) Are girls the fairer sex in India? Revisiting intra-household allocation of education expenditure. World Dev 42:143–164
Beg MN, Bhat GM (2021) Gender and household’s spending on education: an empirical evidence. Asian J Econ Bus Account 21(2):1–13
Bhorkar S, Bray M (2018) The expansion and roles of private tutoring in India: from supplementation to supplantation. Int J Educ Dev 62:148–156
Borooah VK, Diwakar D, Mishra VK, Naik AK, Sabharwal NS (2014) Caste, inequality, and poverty in India: a re-assessment. Dev Stud Res Open Access J 1(1):279–294
Bray M (2013) Shadow education: comparative perspectives on the expansion and implications of private supplementary tutoring. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 77:412–420
Bray M (2014) The impact of shadow education on student academic achievement: why the research is inconclusive and what can be done about it. Asia Pac Educ Rev 15(3):381–389
Bray M, Kwo O (2013) Behind the façade of fee-free education: shadow education and its implications for social justice. Oxf Rev Educ 39:480–497
Bray M, Zhan S, Lykins C, Wang D, Kwo O (2014) Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education. Econ Educ Rev 38:24–37
Bray M, Lykins C (2012) Shadow education: private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia (No. 9). Asian Development Bank
Bray M, Kobakhidze MN, Kwo O (2020) Shadow education in Myanmar: private supplementary tutoring and its policy implications. UNESCO and Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC), the University of Hong Kong
Bray TM (1999) The shadow education system: private tutoring and its implications for planners. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning
Bray M (2021) Geographies of shadow education: patterns and forces in the spatial distributions of private supplementary tutoring. Comp J Comp Int Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2021.1915749
Bray M (2022) Shadow education in Asia and the Pacific: features and implications of private supplementary tutoring. In: Lee WO et al (eds) International handbook on education development in Asia-Pacific. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–23
Bray M (2023) Understanding private supplementary tutoring: metaphors, diversities and agendas for shadow education research (Comprendiendo las clases particulares complementarias: metáforas, variedades y agendas para la investigación sobre educación en la sombra). J Study Educ Dev 1–46
Briant E, Doherty C, Dooley K, English R (2020) In fateful moments: the appeal of parent testimonials when selling private tutoring. Pedagog Cult Soc 28(2):223–239
Buchmann C, Condron DJ, Roscigno VJ (2010) Shadow education, American style: test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Soc Forces 89(2):435–461
Byun SY, Chung HJ, Baker DP (2018) Global patterns of the use of shadow education: student, family, and national influences. In: Park H, Kao G (eds) Research in the sociology of education. Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp 71–105
Choudhury PK, Kumar A, Gill AS (2021) Who all access private coaching in higher education and how much do they spend? Evidence from India. J Asia Pac Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2021.1954302
Cole R (2017) Estimating the impact of private tutoring on academic performance: primary students in Sri Lanka. Educ Econ 25(2):142–157
Dang H, Rogers FH (2008) The growing phenomenon of private tutoring: Does it deepen human capital, widen inequalities, or waste resources? World Bank Res Obs 23:161–200
Das U (2021) Rural employment guarantee programme in India and its impact on household educational decisions: a focus on private tutoring. J Int Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3546
Datta S, Kingdon GG (2019) Gender bias in intra-household allocation of education in India: Has it fallen over time? IZA DP No. 12671, Institute of Labour Economics, Bonn, Germany
Dawson W (2010) Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia. Asia-Pac Educ Rev 11(1):14–24
Dongre A, Tewary V (2015) Impact of private tutoring on learning levels. Econ Pol Wkly 50(41):72–80
Downey DB (1995) When bigger is not better: family size, parental resources, and’children’s educational performance. Am Sociol Rev 160:746–761
Elamin O, Rizk R, Adams J (2019) Private tutoring and parents’ decision to work more: evidence from Egypt. Educ Econ 27:132–154
Exley S (2021) Locked in: understanding the ‘irreversibility’ of powerful private supplementary tutoring markets. Oxford Rev Educ 48:1–17
Ghosh P, Bray M (2020) School systems as breeding grounds for shadow education: factors contributing to private supplementary tutoring in West Bengal, India. Eur J Educ Res Dev Policy 55(3):342–360
Gill AS (2017) State, market and social inequalities: a study of primary education in the Indian Punjab. Millennial Asia 8(2):194–216
Government of India (2019) Key indicators of household social consumption on education in India. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi
Grey D, Osborne C (2020) Perceptions and principles of personal tutoring. J Furth High Educ 44:285–299
Gupta A (2020) Heterogeneous middle-class and disparate educational advantage: parental investment in their children’s schooling in Dehradun, India. Br J Sociol Educ 41(1):48–63
Gupta A (2022) A ‘shadow education’ timescape: an empirical investigation of the temporal arrangements of private tutoring vis-à-vis formal schooling in India. Br J Educ Stud 70(6):771–787
Gupta A (2021) Exposing the shadow: an empirical scrutiny of the shadowing process of private tutoring in India. Educ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931038
Hamid MO, Sussex R, Khan A (2009) Private tutoring in English for secondary school students in Bangladesh. TESOL Q 43(2):281–308
Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161
Heckman JJ, Honore BE (1990) The empirical content of the Roy model. Econometrica 8(5):1121–1149
Ireson J, Rushforth K (2014) Why do parents employ private tutors for their children? Exploring psychological factors that influence demand in England. J Educ Res Online 6:12–33
Jha SK (2021) The three E’s of private tuition in India: expansion, expenditure, and effect. J Educ. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211032345
Jones A (2000) Health Econometrics Handbook of Health Economics 1:265–344
Joshi P (2021) Private schooling and tutoring at scale in South Asia. In: Sarangapani PM, Pau R (eds) Handbook of education systems in South Asia. Springer, Singapore, pp 1127–1146
Kany N (2021) The rise of private tutoring in Denmark: an entrepreneur’s perspectives and experiences. ECNU Rev Educ 4(3):630–639
Kaul T (2018) Intra-household allocation of educational expenses: gender discrimination and investing in the future. World Dev 104:336–343
Kim YC (2016) Shadow education, curriculum, and culture of schooling in South Korea. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY
Kobakidze MN, Suter LE (2020) The global diversity of shadow education. Eur J Educ 55:316–321
Kugler AD, Kumar S (2017) Preference for boys, family size, and educational attainment in India. Demography 54:835–859
Kumar N (2017) Private coaching factories: widening educational divide and exclusion in India. Int J Higher Educ Sustain 1(4):275–284
Kumar D, Choudhury PK (2021) Do private schools really produce more learning than public schools in India? Accounting for student’s school absenteeism and the time spent on homework. Int J Educ Dev 83:102395
Kumar I, Chowdhury IR (2021) Shadow education in India: participation and socioeconomic determinants. J South Asian Dev 16(2):244–272
Kumar M, Naincy N (2020) Revisiting the gender gap in private household expenditure on education in India: an empirical analysis. Paradigm 24:164–176
Majumdar M (2014) The shadow school system and new class divisions in India. Max Weber Stiftung, London
Mandikiana BW (2021) Choice and expenditure: a double hurdle model of private tutoring in Qatar. Econ Anal Policy 71:1–15
MHRD [Ministry of Human Resource Development] (2020) National education policy 2020, Ministry of human resource development, Government of India, New Delhi. Available at: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2022
Mishra RK (2015) Rashtriya madhyamik shiksha abhiyan takes a nosedive. Econ Pol Wkly 43:25–27
Mora JG, Garcia A (1999) Private costs of higher education in Spain. Eur J Educ 34(1):95–110
Mori I, Baker D (2010) The origin of universal shadow education: what the supplemental education phenomenon tells us about the postmodern institution of education. Asia Pac Educ Rev 11(1):36–48
NSO [National Statistical Office] (2020) Household social consumption on education in India. NSS 75th round report, National Statistical Office, Government of India, New Delhi
Pandey A, Gautam R (2020) Regional inequality in India: a state level analysis. J Community Posit Pract 4:56–85
Park H, Buchmann C, Choi J, Merry JJ (2016) Learning beyond the school walls: trends and implications. Ann Rev Sociol 42:231–252
Parveen K, Alghamdi AA, Javed I, Din IU (2022) Economic burden of private tutoring at higher secondary level in Pakistan: an analysis through Hurder and Linear regression model. Front Psychol 13:904956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904956
Pratham (2023) Annual status of education report 2022. Pratham, New Delhi
Psacharopoulos G, Mattson R (2000) Family size, education expenditure and attainment in a poor country. J Educ Plan Adm 14:169–186
Punjabi S (2020) Is shadow education becoming the ‘new’ formal? Effects of pedagogical approaches of IIT-JEE coaching on school education in the City of Delhi. Contemp Educ Dialogue 17(1):14–44
Reddy CS (2020) Universal secondary education in India: access, equity and social justice. In: Tilak JBG (ed) Universal secondary education in India: issues, challenges and prospects. Springer, Singapore, pp 205–220
Saha A (2013) An assessment of gender discrimination in household expenditure on education in India. Oxf Dev Stud 41:220–238
Sahoo S, Klasen S (2021) Gender segregation in education: evidence from higher secondary stream choice in India. Demography 58(3):987–1010
Sharma Y (1997) A lesson in exam pressure. South China Morning Post 22:18
Singhal K, Das U (2019) Revisiting the role of private schooling on children learning outcomes: evidence from rural India. South Asia Econ J 20(2):274–302
Šťastný V (2021) Shadow education: a double-edged sword for Czech mainstream schools in the competitive educational market. Res Pap Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1907777
Sujatha K (2014) Private tuition in India: trends and issues. Rev Int D’éducation Sèvres. https://doi.org/10.4000/ries.3913
Swethavimala M, Radhakrishnan, V (2023) Private tuitions helped blunt learning loss in many States. The Hindu
Tansel A, Bircan F (2006) Demand for education in Turkey: A tobit analysis of private tutoring expenditures. Econ Educ Rev 25:303–313
Tilak JBG (2020) Universal secondary education in India: an introductory overview of issues, challenges and prospects. In: Tilak JBG (ed) Universal secondary education in India: issues, challenges and prospects. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–14
Tilak JBG (2000) Household expenditure on education in India: A preliminary explanation of the 52nd round of the National Sample Survey. Mimeo, National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration, New Delhi
Trivedi PK (2007) Structural challenges, development goals and concerns for equity: a case of caste in India. Soc Change 37:53–77
Urwick J (2002) Determinants of the private costs of primary and early childhood education: findings from Plateau State, Nigeria. Int J Educ Dev 22:131–144
Wadhwa W (2013) Private inputs into schooling: bang for the buck, Annual status of education report
Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press, Cambridge
Yung KWH (2021) Shadow education as a form of oppression: conceptualizing experiences and reflections of secondary students in Hong Kong. Asia Pac J Educ 41:115–129
Zhang Y (2013) Does private tutoring improve students’ national college entrance exam performance? A case study from Jinan, China. Econ Educ Rev 32:1–28
Zhang W, Bray M (2018) Equalising schooling, unequalising private supplementary tutoring: access and tracking through shadow education in China. Oxf Rev Educ 44:221–238
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Choudhury, P.K., Gill, A.S. & Kumar, A. What drives demand for private tutoring in secondary education? Evidence from India. J. Soc. Econ. Dev. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00291-8
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00291-8