Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Network alliances and firms’ performance: a panel data analysis of Pakistani SMEs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical studies shows that SMEs are characterized by budget constraints and are reluctant to invest in innovation activities such as undertaking R&D, taking out patents, and hiring highly qualified research staff. This paper suggests that SMEs’ can adopt network alliances to minimize their resource constraints. SMEs’ network alliances such as joint ventures, R&D cooperation and firms’ co-located in the industrial zones positively influence the firms’ labour productivity and innovation performance. In addition, SMEs are engaged in product and process innovation, quality standards and management experience have a positive impact on the firm’s labour productivity and innovation performance. To the best of my knowledge, hardly any empirical study is carried out to analyze the Pakistani SMEs using unbalance panel data. This research paper has used 2 year unbalanced panel data (2002 and 2007) on 391 Pakistani manufacturing SMEs. Overall, two models have been used with generalized least square estimation and probit analysis using the random effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The sample size slight increased (n = 400) for probit model because of labour productivity has been removed as dependent variable. Product innovation (dummy variable) is used as dependent variable in the second model.

References

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 426–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, James, & Andrew, James D. (2007). Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: a case study using social networks analysis. R&D Management, 37(3), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. R., & Benavides-Espinosa, M. M. (2011). Innovation in services through learning in joint venture. Services Industrial Journal, 31(12), 2019–2032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2004). Sustaining innovation and growth: public policy support for entrepreneurship. Industry and innovation, 11(3), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aw, B. Y. (2002). Productivity dynamics of small and medium enterprises in Taiwan. Small Business Economics, 18, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2005). SMEs, growth and poverty: cross country evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 199–229.

  • Berchicci, Luca. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: internal R&D investment. External Knowledge Acquisition, Research Policy, 42(1), 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezic, H. Vojvodic, K and Stojcic, N. (2010). Export competitiveness, firm behaviour and obstacles for doing business, Poslovna Logistika u Suvremenom Menadzmentu, X, 11–26.

  • Bjerk, Lina; Johansson, Sara (2014). Innovation and Firm Collaboration-An Exploration of Survey Data, Working Paper 383, CESIS, 1–24.

  • Cantner, Uwe, Conti, Elisa, & Meder, A. (2010). Networks and innovation: the role of social assets in exploring firms innovative capacity. European Planning Studies, 18(12), 1937–1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R., & Al-Khawaldeh, K. (2002). TQM and labour productivity in Jordanian industrial companies. The TQM Magazine, 14(4), 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasanayaka, W. S. B. (2008). SMEs in globalized world, a brief note on basic profits of Pakistan SMEs and possible research directions. Business Review, 3(1), 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis, N., Mike, S., & Andronikidis, A. (2005). Knowledge diffusion in localised economies of SMEs: the role of local supporting organisations. Environment and Planning C, Government and Policy, 23, 799–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteve-Escribe, A., & Peinado, L. (2009). The influence of top management teams in the strategic orientation and performance of small & medium-sized enterprises. British Journal of Management, 20, 581–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, Isabel, & Fuente, Gabriel. (2010). Technological joint venture: formation under the real option approach. Research Policy, 39(9), 1185–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freel, M. S. (1999). Where are the skills gaps in innovative small firms? International Journal of Entrepreneurship Behaviour & Research, 5(3), 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freel, S. M. (2000). Barriers to product innovation in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 18(2), 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukugama, Nobuya. (2006). Determining factors in innovation of small firm networks: a case of cross industry groups in Japan. Small Business Economics, 27, 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grando, A., & Belvedere, V. (2006). District manufacturing performances: a comparison among large, small to medium sized and District Enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronum, S., Verreyne, L., & Kastelle, J. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium- sized enterprise and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjimanolis, A. (1999). Barriers to innovation for SMEs in small less developed country: Cyprus. Technovation, 19(9), 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., & Lotti, F. (2009). Innovation and Productivity in SMEs: empirical Evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33, 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2009). Spill over and backward linkages effects of FDI: empirical evidence for the UK’. SERC Discussion Paper, 16, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R., & Trainor, M. (2005). Why do some firms undertake R&D activities whereas other do not? A study of attitudes to R&D using a sample of matched firms’. CPPR, University of Glasgow (pp. 1–24).

  • Hoang, T. D., Igel, B., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2010). Total quality management (TQM) strategy and organisational characteristics: evidence from recent WTO member. Total Quality Management, 21(9), 931–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., & Bessant, J. (1998). Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review. Technovation, 18(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis: advantages and challenges. TEST (pp. 1–63).

  • Hung, V.T. (2007). SMEs and Supply Chains, Director General National office of Intellectual Property of Vietnam Macao (pp. 1–8).

  • Hussain, N. (2000). Linkages between SMEs and large industries for increased markets and trade: an African perspective. Economic Research Paper, 53, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, K. (2010). An evaluation of small & medium enterprises development in Pakistan. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 02(1), 34–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, V. (2006). Determinants of product innovation in small firms: a comparison across industries. International Small Business Journal, 24(6), 587–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, C., & Olsson, O. (1998). Product innovation in small and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 10, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., & Shane, S. (2005). When does lack of resources make new firms innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 814–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khokhar, Y. (2010). SME Development Report 2010-11, SMEDA (pp. 1–50).

  • Kim, R. P. (2000). R&D and firm size in the information and telecommunications industry of Korea. Small Business Economics, 15(3), 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koberg, Ralph, & Watson, John. (2012). The impact of total quality management adoption on small & enterprises financial performance. Accounting and Finance, 52, 421–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, A., & Strotman, H. (2008). Absorptive capacity and innovation in the knowledge intensive business services sector. Economics of Innovation and Technology, 17(6), 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Journal of Strategic Management, 19, 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y.-J. (2009). Firm size and innovation performance: an empirical study from Chinese photoelectric industry. Innovation Management Industrial Engineering, 1–5.

  • Lopez-Navarro, M. A., & Callarisa-Fiol, L. (2013). Long-term orientation and commitment in export joint ventures among small & medium-sized firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(1), 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, M. (2008). Labour productivity and employment in Australia Manufacturing SMEs. Journal of International Management, 4(1), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S. A., & Iqbal, Z. (2010). TQM practices & organizational performance: evidence from Pakistani SMEs. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 10(4), 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marri, B. H., Gunasekaran, A., & Grieve, R. J. (1998). An integration into the implementation of computer integrated manufacturing in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Avance Technology, 14, 935–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minarelli, F., Raggi, M., & Viaggi, D. (2013). Network for innovation as a way to enhance competitiveness: an overview of Italian food SMEs Entering Networks. Conference Paper (pp. 1–10).

  • Mohsin, A. A., Halim, H. A., & Ahmad, N. H. (2015). Competitive intelligence among SMEs: assessing the role of entrepreneurial attitude orientation on innovation performance. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, C. K. M. Lau (Eds.), Innovation, finance, and the economy. Proceedings of the 13th Eurasia business and economics society conference (pp. 15–22). Switzerland: Springer.

  • Musolesi, A., & Huiban, J.-P. (2010). Innovation and productivity in knowledge intensive business services. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34, 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadine, B. (2015). Network and product innovation across European SMEs. Discussion Paper No. 229 (pp. 1–23).

  • Nadvi, K. (1992). Flexible specialization, industrial districts and employment in Pakistan. Working Paper 232 (pp. 1–40).

  • Narula, R. (2004). R&D collaboration by SMEs: a new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalization. Technovation, 1–17.

  • Radas, S., & Bozic, L. (2009). The antecedents of SMEs innovativeness in an emerging transition economies. Technovation, 29(6–7), 438–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non- R&D–performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Economics, 33(1), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, M. (2007). Small business in small economies: constraints and opportunities for growth. Social and Economic Studies. 56(1/2), 304–321.

  • Sampson, C. R. (2007). R&D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 364–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, B. (2003). R&D strategy and Australian manufacturing industry: an empirical investigation of emphasis and effectiveness. Technovation, 23, 929–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. (2006). Small firm networking: an insight into contents and motivating factors. International Small Business Journal, 24(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, P. (1999). Technological innovations by SMEs in India. Technovation, 317–321.

  • Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2013). Research collaboration & R&D outsourcing: different R&D personnel requirements in SMEs. Techonovation, 33, 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terziovski, Mile. (2010). Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises in the manufacturing sector: a resource-based view. Strategic Managment Journal, 31, 892–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaver, Z. (2014). Progress analysis: SMEs analysis vital to long term sustainable growth. http://www.tribune.com.pk/. Accessed 20 Dec 2014.

  • van Staveren, I., & Knorringa, P. (2007). Unpacking social capital in economic development: how social relations matter. Review of Social Economy LXV, 1, 107–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of SMEs. Journal of Strategic Management, 24, 1307–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2009). Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small Business Economics, 32(4), 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. A., & Pett, T. L. (2006). Small firms’ performance: modelling the role of product and process improvements. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 268–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K., & Lee, L. (2008). Occupational choice: the influence of product vs. process innovation. Small Business Economics, 30, 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. (2007). Introductory Econometrics, 3rd edn. South Western College. www.tribune.com.pk. Accessed 30 Dec 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan

    Naqeeb Ur Rehman

Authors
  1. Naqeeb Ur Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naqeeb Ur Rehman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rehman, N.U. Network alliances and firms’ performance: a panel data analysis of Pakistani SMEs. Eurasian Bus Rev 6, 37–52 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0033-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0033-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation