Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Network management and associated firms’ outcomes: multilevel analysis in the southern Brazilian context

  • Published:
Journal of Management & Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article seeks to provide theoretical and managerial insights with respect to the following questions: What is the effect of network management on the outcomes of associated firms? Do these effects on outcomes vary among small-firm networks (SFNs)? Do these outcomes vary among associated firms within the same SFN? Which management elements are most influential in the variation of these SFN outcomes? To answer these questions, this study adopts a multilevel analytical approach using SFNs in southern Brazil that benefit from the Cooperation Networks Program, a local public policy initiative that supports the formation, development, and consolidation of SFNs. The findings suggest that the outcomes provided by the networks differ between networks but are similar for firms in the same network. They also indicate that strategy and processes at the network level are related to firms’ outcomes. These findings show that the influence of structure on firms’ outcomes varies among networks and that the market segment is the only network-level variable that is significantly related to firms’ outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balestrin, A., Vargas, L. M., & Fayard, P. (2008). Knowledge creation in small-firm network. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(2), 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benassi, M. (1995). Governance factors in a network process approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(3), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., Eriksson, J., & Wincent, J. (2010). Co-opetition dynamics—An outline for further inquiry. Competitiveness Review, 20(2), 194–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., & Johansson, M. (2014). Managing coopetition to create opportunities for small firms. International Small Business Journal, 32(4), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). “Coopetition” in business networks—To cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). Coopetition—Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31(5), 735–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswicker, S., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2015). Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1241–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, J. G., & Ketchen, D. J. (1999). Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management Journal, 20(9), 867–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E. (2006). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 713–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagnino, G. B., Levanti, G., Minà, A., & Picone, M. (2015). Interorganizational network and innovation: A bibliometric study and proposed research agenda. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 30(3–4), 354–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagnino, G. B., & Rocco, E. (2009). Coopetition strategy: Theory, experiments and cases. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussauge, P., Garrette, B., & Mitchell, W. (2000). Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebers, M., & Grandori, A. (1997). The form, costs and development dynamics of inter-organizational networking. In M. Ebers (Ed.), The formation of inter-organizational networks (pp. 265–286). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebers, M., & Oerlemans, L. (2013). The variety of governance structures beyond market and hierarchy. Journal of Management, Published online before print. doi:10.1177/0149206313506938. 21 October 2013.

  • Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2006). Managing stakeholder involvement in decision-making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in The Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 417–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmark, A. (2009). The functional differentiation of governance: Public governance beyond hierarchy, market and networks. Public Administration, 87(2), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. R. (2009). Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995). Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronum, S., Verreynne, M. L., & Kastelle, T. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haahti, A., Madupu, V., Yavas, U., & Babakus, E. (2005). Cooperative strategy, knowledge intensity and export performance of small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of World Business, 40(2), 124–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1989). No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5(3), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halinen, A., Törnroos, J. Å., & Elo, M. (2013). Network process analysis: An event-based approach to study business network dynamics. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1213–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, V., & Walsh, K. (2002). Small firm networks: A successful approach to innovation? R&D Management, 32(3), 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, K. H., & Duysters, G. M. (2007). Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, P., Huxham, C., & Smith-Ring, P. (2008). Managing collaborative inter-organizational relations. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. Smith-Ring (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 118–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (1997). An emergent theory of structure and outcomes in small-firm strategic manufacturing networks. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 368–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 327–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, L., & Sakkab, N. (2006). Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gamble’s new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2013). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2001). Value creation and success in strategic alliances: Alliancing skills and the role of alliance structure and systems. European Management Journal, 19(5), 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2007). Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 981–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Singh, H., & Bell, J. (2009). Relating well: Building capabilities for sustaining alliance networks. In P. Kleindorfer & Y. Wind (Eds.), The network challenge: Strategies for managing the new interlinked enterprise (pp. 353–363). London: Pearson Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (1993). The structure of strategy. Business Strategy Review, 4(2), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., Steijn, B., & Edelenbos, J. (2010). The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Public Administration, 88(4), 1063–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. S. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 621–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). Creating a strategic center to manage a web of partners. California Management Review, 37(3), 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui, S. S., & Lu, Y. (2002). Managing the inter-firm cooperation process: Exploratory case studies of Hong Kong architects and contractors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 502–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui, S. S., & Ngo, H. (2005). An action pattern model of inter-firm cooperation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1123–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, A., & Johanson, M. (2011). Network strategies for regional growth. In M. Johanson & H. Lundberg (Eds.), Network strategies for regional growth (pp. 01–22). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, L. F., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2008). Horizontal and vertical relationships in developing economies: Implications for SMEs’ access to global markets. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1986). Organizations: New concepts for new forms. California Management Review, 28(3), 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moliterno, T. P., & Mahony, D. M. (2011). Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management, 37(2), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, P., Zaefarian, G., Najafi Tavani, Z. H., Neghabi, S., & Zaefarian, R. (2014). The influence of network effects on SME performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(4), 630–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niesten, E., & Jolink, A. (2015). The impact of alliance management capabilities on alliance attributes and performance: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1), 69–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nootebomm, B. (2004). Inter-firm collaboration, learning and networks: An integrated approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., & Vokurka, R. J. (1998). The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H. (1996). Managing an Interorganizational Network: A framework of the institutional mechanism for network control. Organization Studies, 17(5), 795–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, S. G., Lundberg, H., & Andresen, E. (2011). Interpartner legitimacy in regional strategic networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 1024–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1987). Walter W. Hybrid organizational arrangements: New form or transitional development? California Management Review, 30(1), 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40(3), 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Sydow, J. (2008). Evaluating inter-organizational relationships. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. Smith-Ring (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 691–718). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab, J., Mannak, R. S., & Cambre, B. (2013). Combining structure, governance, and context: A configurational approach to network effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Published online before print. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut039. 23 August 2013.

  • Reed, R., Storrud-Barnes, S., & Jessup, L. (2012). How open innovation affects the drivers of competitive advantage: Trading the benefits of IP creation and ownership for free invention. Management Decision, 50(1), 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy–When is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014). Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon. Com. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, P. J., & Bennett, R. J. (2000). SME growth: The relationship with business advice and external collaboration. Small Business Economics, 15(3), 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, S. A. (1996). Does cooperation enhance competitiveness? Assessing the impacts of inter-firm collaboration. Research Policy, 25(2), 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonjans, B., Van Cauwenberge, P., & Vander Bauwhede, H. (2013). Formal business networking and SME growth. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soda, G. (2011). The management of firms’ alliance network positioning: Implications for innovation. European Management Journal, 29(5), 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2014). Collaboration could fuel rise of the independent retailer. http://www.theguardian.com/small-business-network/2014/apr/01/collaboration-fuel-rise-independent-retailer?CMP=share_btn_link. Accessed 01 March 2016.

  • Tomlinson, P. R., & Fai, F. M. (2013). The nature of SME co-operation and innovation: A multi-scalar and multi-dimensional analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 316–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verschoore, J. R., & Balestrin, A. (2011). Outcomes in small-firm networks: A quantitative study in the southern Brazilian context. In M. Johanson & H. Lundberg (Eds.), Network strategies for regional growth (pp. 79–99). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D., & Padula, A. D. (2010). Governance and management of horizontal business networks: An analysis of retail networks in Germany. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 74–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildeman, L. (1998). Alliances and networks: The next generation. International Journal of Technology Management, 15(1–2), 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (2005). Cooperation by design: Structure and cooperation in interorganizational networks. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ysa, T., Sierra, V., & Esteve, M. (2014). Determinants of network outcomes: The impact of management strategies. Public Administration, 92(3), 636–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M., Reuer, J. J., & Singh, H. (2002). Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 13(6), 701–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unisinos University, Av. Unisinos, 950, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil

    Jorge Verschoore, Alsones Balestrin & Rafael Teixeira

Authors
  1. Jorge Verschoore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alsones Balestrin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rafael Teixeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Verschoore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verschoore, J., Balestrin, A. & Teixeira, R. Network management and associated firms’ outcomes: multilevel analysis in the southern Brazilian context. J Manag Gov 21, 211–232 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9345-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9345-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation