Nano-Micro Letters

, 11:42 | Cite as

Integrated System of Solar Cells with Hierarchical NiCo2O4 Battery-Supercapacitor Hybrid Devices for Self-Driving Light-Emitting Diodes

  • Yuliang Yuan
  • Yangdan Lu
  • Bei-Er Jia
  • Haichao Tang
  • Lingxiang Chen
  • Yu-Jia Zeng
  • Yang HouEmail author
  • Qinghua Zhang
  • Qinggang He
  • Lei Jiao
  • Jianxing Leng
  • Zhizhen Ye
  • Jianguo LuEmail author
Open Access


  • Integration of solar cells, BSHs, and LEDs was developed for energy conversion, storage, and utilization in one system.

  • NiCo2O4//AC BSHs were charged by a-Si/H solar cells for stably driving LEDs showing high performances.


An integrated system has been provided with a-Si/H solar cells as energy conversion device, NiCo2O4 battery-supercapacitor hybrid (BSH) as energy storage device, and light emitting diodes (LEDs) as energy utilization device. By designing three-dimensional hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays as faradic electrode, with capacitive electrode of active carbon (AC), BSHs were assembled with energy density of 16.6 Wh kg–1, power density of 7285 W kg–1, long-term stability with 100% retention after 15,000 cycles, and rather low self-discharge. The NiCo2O4//AC BSH was charged to 1.6 V in 1 s by solar cells and acted as reliable sources for powering LEDs. The integrated system is rational for operation, having an overall efficiency of 8.1% with storage efficiency of 74.24%. The integrated system demonstrates a stable solar power conversion, outstanding energy storage behavior, and reliable light emitting. Our study offers a precious strategy to design a self-driven integrated system for highly efficient energy utilization.


Integrated system NiCo2O4 Battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices Self-driving LED 

1 Introduction

Combination of energy conversion, storage, and utilization devices has been widely investigated due to its possibilities in practical applications [1, 2, 3]. Among the three devices, electrochemical energy storage devices serve as the core component for both energy storage and power output [4]. As is well known, clean energies, including solar energy, wind energy, and tidal energy that are expected to be used in large scale in the near future, are intermittent and even irregular owing to the changes in weather and thus unsuitable for all day power supply [5]. For instance, solar energy can only work under sunlight illumination, which is affected by not only the cycle of day and night, but also the variation of sunlight intensity during daytime such as clear and cloudy. Therefore, the energy devices are indispensible to serve as a buffer pool to mitigate the mismatch between solar energy supply and demand.

Currently, electrochemical energy storage devices cover batteries and supercapacitors primarily [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Batteries are really a big family, including conventional lead–acid [13, 14], nickel–cadmium [15, 16], nickel–metal hydride [17, 18, 19], and lithium-ion batteries [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25], as well as newly developed batteries such as lithium–sulfur [26, 27, 28], lithium–air [29, 30, 31], lithium–CO2 [32, 33, 34], sodium/potassium/magnesium/aluminum/zinc ion [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44], and aqueous metal ion batteries [45, 46]. However, the batteries are unsuitable as energy storage devices in the frequently charge and discharge area, such as solar energy, wind energy, and tidal energy, due to the shortcomings of low cycling performance (usually in the order of hundreds of times) [47, 48]. Conventional supercapacitors possess the virtual of long cycling lifetime, but they are restricted to the low energy density and high self-discharge. The giant volume is inevitable to match the energy output, which prevents supercapacitors from practical use. Recently, a new analogous device combined with faradic electrode and capacitive electrode, named hybrid supercapacitor (HSC) or battery-supercapacitor hybrid (BSH) [49, 50, 51, 52], provides a reliable approach to make the hybrid devices with advantages of both batteries and supercapacitors. This combination is promising to satisfy the requirements of both high energy density and high power density to drive different kinds of electrical equipments. With the merit of both long cycling characteristic and high energy density, the BSH devices are particularly suitable for the periodically changed energy generation sources.

In this work, we developed an integrated system with a-Si/H solar cells, three-dimensional (3D) hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays//active carbon (AC) BSHs, and light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to realize energy conversion, storage, and utilization in one system. Benefitting from the unique hierarchical structure, the 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays electrode exhibits a high specific capacity of 130 mAh g−1. The BSHs assembled with NiCo2O4 faradic electrode and AC capacitive electrode display an energy density of 16.6 Wh kg−1, power density of 7,285 W kg−1, long cycling stability (100% retention after 15,000 cycles), and rather low self-discharge. Acting as the energy storage device in the integrated system, the BSHs can store solar energy and output power for driving LEDs. The NiCo2O4//AC BSHs are charged to 1.6 V in 1 s by the solar cells under light illumination, and then, the stored energy rationally powers the LEDs for light emitting. The self-driven integrated system has an overall efficiency of 8.1% with the storage efficiency of 74.24%. This study is expected to pave a road for commercial applications of BSHs in self-driven integrated systems. Moreover, the design of integrated system is expected to provide a potential strategy for clean energy applications, which is of great importance in the situation of today’s growing shortage of fossil energy.

2 Experimental

2.1 Synthesis of 3D Hierarchical NiCo2O4 Arrays

Hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays were prepared by a continuous synthesis process. As the beginning step, a slice of Ni foam (20 × 40 × 1.8 mm3) was weighed for experiments. Nickel chloride hexahydrate (2.5 mmol), cobalt chloride hexahydrate (5 mmol), carbamide (9 mmol), and hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB, 2 mmol) were dissolved in ultrapure water (50 mL). After being stirred by magnetic stirrer to form homogeneous solution, the solution was transferred to a high-pressure autoclave with fill factor of 60%. The prepared Ni foam acted as substrate, and the reaction temperature was 100 °C for 6 h in an oven. Afterward, the Ni foam with products was rinsed with ultrapure water to remove any impurities and dried. After an annealing process at 350 °C for 3 h, the NiCo2O4 nanowire arrays were formed on the Ni foam, which are the intermediate product to obtain the final product.

A simple chemical bath deposition method was used for the further growth of NiCo2O4 nanoflakes. Nickel sulfate (1.0 M in 10 mL), cobaltous sulfate (2 M in 10 mL), and potassium peroxydisulfate (0.25 M in 16 mL) were mixed to form a solution, and then, the ammonia (25 − 28%, 4 mL) was added. The NiCo2O4 nanowire arrays grown on Ni foam were immersed into the obtained solution for 8 min to load NiCo2O4 nanoflakes. After the reaction, an annealed process (350 °C, 2 h) was carried out on the sample to achieve the final product of 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays. The mass loading of hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays is ~ 4 mg cm−2.

2.2 Assembly of NiCo2O4//AC BSHs

The BSH devices were assembled with NiCo2O4 hierarchical arrays as the faradic electrode and AC as the capacitive electrode. The filter paper and 3 M KOH solution were used as membrane and electrolyte, respectively. The AC capacitive electrode was prepared by a generic method. Specifically, the AC, acetylene black, and polyvinylidene fluoride were mixed with a mass ratio of 8:1:1 under vigorous stirring. Then, the N-methyl pyrrolidone was dropped into the mixture under stirring. The paste was coated on the Ni foam after homogeneously mixed. Finally, the faradic electrode, filter paper membrane, and capacitive electrode were encapsulated in a coin cell.

2.3 Integration of Self-Powered System

On the assemble of integrated hybrid system (Fig. 1), the a-Si/H solar cells was served as the energy conversion device, NiCo2O4 hierarchical arrays//AC BSHs as the energy storage device, and LEDs as the energy utilization device. They can be integrated into a module in practical. The single-junction a-Si/H solar cells were fabricated by ourselves, whose structure was designed as: glass/textured ZnO/Al (AZO)/p-type a-Si/H/intrinsic a-Si/H/n-type a-Si/H/Al [53]. Here, textured AZO films that are etched by a unique salt solution are adopted as the front contact layer. The procedures for fabricating a-Si/H solar cells were illustrated in our previous study [53]. The red and green LEDs were commercially obtained.
Fig. 1

a Schematic of the integrated system consisting of a-Si/H solar cells, NiCo2O4//AC BSHs, and LEDs as the energy conversion, storage, and utilization devices. b Equivalent circuit describing the integrated system in the energy conversion and storage mode. c Equivalent circuit describing the integrated system in the energy supply and utilization mode

2.4 Measurements and Evaluations

The characterizations of materials and performance evaluations of each device and whole integrated system are described in detail in Note S1 in the Supporting Information.

3 Results and Discussion

Figure 1a displays the diagram of integrated system. In a typical workflow, the BSHs were charged by the a-Si/H solar cells and then powered the LEDs for light emitting. Figure 1b, c gives the equivalent circuit describing the circuit connection of solar cells, BSHs, and LED in parallel. Figure 1b shows the charge or energy storage process of BSHs by solar cells under light illumination without LEDs in circuit. Theoretically, the BSHs can be charged to the open-circuit voltage of solar cells. Figure 1c exhibits the discharge process of BSHs by output electric power for LEDs when light source is removed.

3.1 Properties of 3D Hierarchical NiCo2O4 Arrays

For the assembly of BSHs, we have synthesized 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays by a continuous two-step solution process (as shown in Fig. S1), which acted as the faradic electrodes in the devices. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns (Figs. 2a and S1d) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra (Fig. S2) confirm the formation of NiCo2O4 with face-centered cubic crystal. Figure 2b, c shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the product. It can be clearly seen that large-area 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays are uniformly formed. A NiCo2O4 hierarchical structure is composed of a core of NiCo2O4 nanowire and a shell of several NiCo2O4 nanoflakes, with the shape like a lengthened carambola. Each nanowire is fully covered by nanoflakes, and each NiCo2O4 nanoflake is parallel with the nanowire. In such a way, abundant nanochannels form between nanoflakes, which can form a fast infiltration path for electrolyte. The 3D hierarchical structure makes all nanowires and nanoflakes highly accessible to electrolyte for energy storage. Also, it is a smart way to increase the mass loading for improving the performance of electrodes.
Fig. 2

a Hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays (red line) and two-stand diffraction pattern of metallic nickel and face-centered cubic NiCo2O4. SEM images of hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays at b low and c high magnifications. d TEM image and e SAED pattern of hierarchical NiCo2O4 nanostructure. f Lattice diffraction fringes of NiCo2O4 recorded at HRTEM. (Color figure online)

Detailed structure and morphology of as-prepared 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays were further investigated by transmission electron microscope (TEM) as illustrated in Fig. 2d–f. Figure 2d displays the TEM image of an individual NiCo2O4 hierarchical nanostructure. The NiCo2O4 nanowire is elegantly wrapped with leaf-like NiCo2O4 nanoflakes, forming a hierarchical homostructure with enhanced surface area. Figure 2e exhibits the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of NiCo2O4 hierarchical structure. The concentric circles with a large amount of diffraction spots in SAED patterns can be obviously observed, which demonstrate that the NiCo2O4 hierarchical arrays are polycrystalline in nature. Figure 2f shows the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of the NiCo2O4 nanoflake shell in one NiCo2O4 hierarchical structure, with planar spacings of 0.20 and 0.24 nm corresponding to (400) and (311) faces of cubic NiCo2O4.

Electrochemical properties of 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays were first characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in KOH solution with saturate calomel electrode (SCE) as reference electrode and Pt foil as counter electrode. Figure 3a depicts the CV curves of 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays at scan rates from 5 to 50 mV s−1 in the potential range of 0 − 0.5 V. The CV curves display a pair of redox peaks generated from positive and negative scan, confirming an obvious redox reaction on the electrode. Generally, this process corresponds to the redox process of Ni2+/Ni3+, Co2+/Co3+, and Co3+/Co4+ [54]. With the increase in scan rate, the redox peaks become less obvious because of a larger ratio of double-layer capacitance from faster scan rate. Clearly, the distinct redox peaks appear over the entire range of scan rates, demonstrating the rapid interfacial charge transport process and the electronic/ionic transport rate.
Fig. 3

a CV curves of hierarchical NiCo2O4 electrode at various scan rates. b GCD curves and c specific capacity of hierarchical NiCo2O4 electrode at current densities from 0.63 to 12.56 A g−1

Galvanostatic charge discharge (GCD) properties of hierarchical NiCo2O4 electrodes were recorded at current densities from 0.63 to 12.56 A g−1, and the results are shown in Fig. 3b. The tilted platform during discharge illustrates a redox reaction during this process, in accordance with a redox reaction energy storage process. The specific capacity of hierarchical NiCo2O4 electrodes is calculated by using GCD curves. Figure 3c illustrates the derived specific capacity values. As the current density increases from 0.63 to 12.56 A g−1, the specific capacity of 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays decreases from 130 to 67 mAh g−1, with 51.4% capacity retained suggesting the high rate capability. All the values are remarkable for use in BSHs. The excellent electrochemical properties can be attributed to the sophisticated 3D hierarchical nanostructure with elevated mass loading, plenty of diffusion channels, and abundant pore structures, which increases the mass of active materials and provide enough active sites for interfacial reactions.

3.2 Behaviors of Hierarchical NiCo2O4//AC BSHs

The BSH devices were assembled using 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays as the faradic electrode and AC as the capacitive electrode. No any binders were used in the NiCo2O4 cathode, which is of advantages for practical applications. The mass loadings of active materials were 1.1 and 4.4 mg for the NiCo2O4 and AC electrodes, respectively. Figure 4a illustrates the GCD curves of NiCo2O4//AC BSHs. The charge–discharge curves display neither an apparent platform in faradaic behavior nor a perfectly triangle shape in double-layer capacitor, suggesting that the BSHs are composed of two kind behaviors. Our BSHs can output a cell voltage of 1.6 V, as shown in Fig. 4a. The BSHs were fabricated in a CR2016 coin cell (diameter of 20 mm and thickness of 1.6 mm), as illustrated in Table S1. The Ragone plot (Fig. 4b) reveals the relation of energy density and power density of BSHs. The BSHs exhibit a high energy density of 16.6 Wh kg−1 at a power density of 291 W kg−1 and a high power density of 7,286 W kg−1 at an energy density of 5.5 Wh kg−1. The volumetric energy density and power density are provided in Fig. S3. The BSHs have a volumetric energy density of 1.14 mWh cm−3 at a volumetric power density of 20.04 mW cm−3 and a volumetric energy density of 0.38 mWh cm−3 at a volumetric power density of 500.91 mW cm−3.
Fig. 4

a GCD curves of NiCo2O4//AC BSH at current densities of 4–100 mA cm−2. b Ragone plot of BSH at different current densities. c Cycling stability of NiCo2O4//AC BSH at current densities of 20 mA cm−2. d EIS plot of BSH (The inset shows the enlarged part at high frequency region)

Cycle performance is conducted for further evaluating BSHs (Fig. 4c). The BSH exhibits an excellent cycle performance with 100% retention of capacity after 15,000 cycles, demonstrating that the 3D hierarchical homostructure can meet the requirement of long cycle ability. The two insets in Fig. 4c show the GCD curves of the first six cycles and last six cycles. The unchanged shape of GCD curves from the beginning to the end confirms the long-term stability of our BSH. Also, an electrochemical kinetic analysis was carried out to provide a detail insight on energy storage mechanisms (Fig. S4). Both the double-layer capacity and faradic capacity contributed to the whole capacity.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of BSHs was further acquired under sinusoidal disturbance voltage from 1 Hz to 100 kHz (Fig. 4d). The equivalent circuit diagram is displayed in Fig. S5, where Rel represents solution resistance, L represents inductance, CPEdl represents double-layer capacitance, RF represents charge transfer resistance, and CPEpse represents pseudocapacitance. The depressed semicircle is observed in the high-frequency area and the sloping line in the low-frequency area, revealing the combination of charge transfer resistance with capacitive features. The equivalent serial resistance (Rel) obtained from the fitted data is only 0.74 Ω, illustrating a very low internal resistance of the BSHs device. The charge transfer resistance (RF), caused by the faradic reactions at the surface of electrode, is around 0.97 Ω. Bode graph of EIS plot is provided in Supplementary Material (Fig. S6), where the fitted curve matches well with the experimental one, confirming the rationality of fitting procedure. The impedance data verify that our BSHs possess both low internal resistance and low charge transfer resistance.

3.3 Performances of Self-Driven Integrated System

Self-driven integrated system is designed by using NiCo2O4//AC BSH as the energy storage device. Single-junction a-Si/H solar cells are employed as the energy conversion device, and LEDs as the energy utilization device, as displayed in Fig. 1. The properties of a-Si/H solar cells were individually investigated in the first place. The photocurrent density–photovoltage (JV) curves of the a-Si/H solar cells tested under AM 1.5 G illumination at 100 mW cm−2 are displayed in Fig. 5a. The open-circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit current density (Jsc), fill factor (FF), and conversion efficiency are determined to be 0.88 V, 17.62 mA cm−2, 0.703, and 10.9%, respectively. The solar cells we used in the experiment possesses exhibit almost the same performances as reported in our previous studies [53].
Fig. 5

a JV curve of single-junction a-Si/H solar cells. b Charge–discharge curve of the NiCo2O4//AC BSHs powered by the solar cells in the integrated system. c Self-discharge curve of NiCo2O4//AC BSH in the integrated system. d Cycling performance of NiCo2O4//AC BSH in the integrated system

The a-Si/H solar cells serve as the energy production device in the integrated system under sunlight illumination. In the experiment of integrated system, the NiCo2O4//AC BSH was charged by two solar cells in series under AM 1.5 G irradiation. In Fig. 5b, the BSH can be charged readily by the solar cells (via solar cell charging controller) with a saturation voltage of 1.601 V due to the Voc restriction. The charging process can be accomplished within 1 s. The NiCo2O4//AC BSHs was constantly discharged at 100 mA cm−2. Figure 5b provides five charge and discharge curves of the BSHs supplied by solar cells. All the five curves show exactly similar shape, illustrating the stable and reliable nature of energy production and storage.

Conventional supercapacitors generally have a tendency for relatively fast self-discharge rate due to the thermodynamic favorable characteristic. The self-discharge mechanisms mainly include overcharging, side reaction, and ohmic leakage. As a similar structure of BSHs with conventional supercapacitors, the self-discharge behavior of the BSHs was studied in our work after it was charged by the solar cells. After charging the BSHs up to specified potential, it was allowed to self-discharge in an open-circuit state, which was monitored with a voltmeter. The BSH self-discharge timescales and shapes in Fig. 5c illustrate an open-circuit voltage variation curve. From the curve, it can be seen that the voltage of the BSHs is first charged to 1.601 V by the solar cells and then decreases to 1.594 V in the first 5 s; afterward, the voltage kept unchanged in the rest time (in 24 h during measurements). These investigations verify the property of integrated hybrid system with a rather low self-discharge.

Cycling stability of the integrated system was also investigated by charging the BSHs with the solar cells, and then discharging galvanostatically for 10,000 cycles, as shown in Fig. 5d. After 10,000 charging and discharging cycles, the capacity of the BSH is decreased only 0.3%, suggesting the excellent cycling stability. The high cycling stability of BSHs driven by solar cells is comparable with that driven by electrochemical workstation. Despite the participation of faradic electrode during charge and discharge process, the high cycling stability is almost the same with double-layer supercapacitors. In the long cycling stability test up to 10,000 cycles, no obvious deterioration is observed, which is really important for BSHs in practical applications. To further confirm the stability of our BSHs, the voltage holding test was investigated at 1.6 V, as shown in Fig. S7. During a procedure for 100 h, the capacity retention was around 90.7% for the NiCo2O4//AC BSH, which can be comparable with previously reported in carbon-based electric double-layer capacitors [55, 56]. The long-lasting cycling stability of NiCo2O4//AC BSHs in our work is rarely obtained, which is believed to be attributed to the well-designed 3D hierarchical structure. The superior cycling performance of the NiCo2O4 array-based BSHs makes it suitable for energy storage of intermittent energies, including solar energy, wind energy, and tidal energy.

One important factor describing the performance of the integrated hybrid system is the overall energy conversion efficiency (ηoverall). The ηoverall is defined by the ratio of effective output energy to the overall input energy. In the case of our integrated system, the effective output energy is defined by the discharge of 3D NiCo2O4 hierarchical arrays//AC BSHs; the overall input energy is defined by the illumination of AM 1.5 G. Thus, the overall energy conversion efficiency can be described as:
$$\eta = \frac{{I_{\text{dis}} \int v {\text{d}}t}}{PSt}$$
where Idis represents the discharge current of 3D NiCo2O4 hierarchical arrays//AC BSH, v represents the cell potential during discharge, P represents power density of illumination light, S represents the light-sensing area of a-Si/H solar cells, and t represents illumination time. The ηoverall determined using this equation is calculated to be 8.1%, which is certainly a reasonable result for our hybrid system with a slightly decrease, as compared with the conversion efficiency of 10.91% for a-Si/H solar cells. The overall conversion efficiency of 8.1% is high and commendable in photovoltage-energy storage systems, because the overall conversion efficiency is below 5% in most cases.
The storage efficiency, defined as the efficiency of energy output from solar cells to BSHs, has also been taken into account. Table S2 lists the overall efficiency and storage efficiency of photovoltage-energy storage systems in almost all available studies reported in recent years. For clear identification, the overall efficiency and storage efficiency of available photovoltage-energy storage systems are plotted in Fig. 6. In the plot, the x-axis denotes storage efficiency, and the y-axis denotes overall efficiency. Thus, the obtained data located at the top-right corner signify both high overall efficiency and high storage efficiency. For our photovoltage-energy storage system, the overall efficiency is 8.1% and the storage efficiency is 74.24%, which is located at the top-right corner together with other three reported works, superior to most reported values, revealing the excellent performance of the system.
Fig. 6

Overall efficiency and storage efficiency of photovoltage-energy storage systems in all the available studies reported in recent years. The details of references are listed in Table S2

After being charged by the solar cells, the BSHs can serve as power sources for a variety of electrical devices. For example, the BSHs devices can rationally power various LEDs. Figure 7 gives the time-dependent brightness of green and red LEDs after being lit up by our BSHs. Since the coin BSHs are charged by the solar cells under illumination, they can power a green LED for more than 10 min, and a red LED for more than 30 min, respectively, which are applausive observations. This result strongly confirms the feasibility of our integrated device as self-powered systems.
Fig. 7

The photograph of green and red LEDs lit up by our BSHs and the light intensity variation of green LED in 10 min and red LED in 30 min in the integrated system. (Color figure online)

4 Conclusions

In conclusion, we have proposed an integration of energy conversion (a-Si/H solar cells), storage (NiCo2O4//AC BSHs), and utilization (LEDs) in one system. Each of the component functions well, and the whole system works independently. As the key of the integrated system, NiCo2O4//AC BSHs are elaborately designed, with lengthened carambola-like 3D hierarchical NiCo2O4 arrays as faradic electrodes and AC as capacitive electrodes. The BSHs exhibit excellent overall performances with high energy density of 16.6 Wh kg−1, high power density of 7,285 W kg−1, long cycling stability of 100% retention after 15,000 cycles, and rather low self-discharge. During the operation, the NiCo2O4//AC BSHs are charged to 1.6 V within 1 s by a-Si/H solar cells, serving as a stable voltage supply for powering LEDs. The self-driven integrated system has an overall efficiency of 8.1% with the storage efficiency of 74.24%, presenting stable and reliable behaviors in photovoltaic conversion, efficient energy storage, and functions as light emitting. This work is supposed to prove the potential applications of BSHs in self-driven systems and provide an evaluation method for such kind of integrated systems.



Y. Hou thanks the support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51702284 and 21878270), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LR19B060002), and the Startup Foundation for Hundred-Talent Program of Zhejiang University (112100-193820101/001/022). Y. J. Zeng thanks the support of Shenzhen Science and Technology Project of China (JCYJ20170412105400428). J. G. Lu thanks the support of Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LR16F040001) and Open Project of Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University. Y. Hou, Q.H. Zhang, Q.G. He, and J.G. Lu thank the support of Innovation Platform of Energy Storage Engineering and New Material in Zhejiang University (K19-534202-002) and Provincial Innovation Team on Hydrogen Electric Hybrid Power Systems in Zhejiang Province.

Supplementary material

40820_2019_274_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (633 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 755 kb)


  1. 1.
    R. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Zou, T. Song, B. Sun, Integrated solar capacitors for energy conversion and storage. Nano Res. 10(5), 1545–1559 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Liu, J. Wang, T. Sun, M. Wang, C. Wu et al., Silicon nanowire/polymer hybrid solar cell-supercapacitor: a self-charging power unit with a total efficiency of 10.5%. Nano Lett. 17(7), 4240–4247 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Zhu, Y. Huang, Y. Huang, Z. Pei, Q. Xue, H. Li, H. Geng, C. Zhi, Capacitance enhancement in a semiconductor nanostructure-based supercapacitor by solar light and a self-powered supercapacitor–photodetector system. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26(25), 4481–4490 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Hassanalieragh, T. Soyata, A. Nadeau, G. Sharma, UR-SolarCap: an open source intelligent auto-wakeup solar energy harvesting system for supercapacitor-based energy buffering. IEEE Access 4, 542–557 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. Xu, S. Li, H. Zhang, Y. Shen, S.M. Zakeeruddin, M. Graetzel, Y.B. Cheng, M. Wang, A power pack based on organometallic perovskite solar cell and supercapacitor. ACS Nano 9(2), 1782–1787 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.K. Shukla, S. Sampath, K. Vijayamohanan, Electrochemical supercapacitors: energy storage beyond batteries. Curr. Sci. 79(12), 1656–1661 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.M. Tarascon, M. Armand, Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414(6861), 359–367 (2001). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Winter, R.J. Brodd, What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors? Chem. Rev. 104(10), 4245–4269 (2004). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Wang, Y. Yuan, J. Yang, L. Meng, H. Tang, Y. Zeng, Z. Ye, J. Lu, Hierarchical core–shell Co3O4/graphene hybrid fibers: potential electrodes for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. 53(8), 6116–6123 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Yuan, W. Wang, J. Yang, H. Tang, Z. Ye, Y. Zeng, J. Lu, Three-dimensional NiCo2O4@MnMoO4 core-shell nanoarrays for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors. Langmuir 33(40), 10446–10454 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Yang, Y. Yuan, W. Wang, H. Tang, Z. Ye, J. Lu, Interconnected Co0.85Se nanosheets as cathode materials for asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 340(1), 6–13 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    X. Cheng, C. Lei, J. Yang, B. Yang, Z. Li, J. Lu, X. Zhang, L. Lei, Y. Hou, K.K. Ostrikov, Efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution at extremely high current density over 3D ultrasmall zero-valent iron-coupled nickel sulfide nanosheets. ChemElectroChem 5(24), 3866–3872 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.A. Deyab, Ionic liquid as an electrolyte additive for high performance lead-acid batteries. J. Power Sources 390(30), 176–180 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.-E. Jin, D. Jin, J. Shim, W. Shim, Enhancing reversible sulfation of PbO2 nanoparticles for extended lifetime in lead-acid batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164(7), A1628–A1634 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Ahlberg, U. Palmqvist, N. Simic, R. Sjovall, Capacity loss in Ni-Cd pocket plate batteries. The origin of the second voltage plateau. J. Power Sources 85(2), 245–253 (2000). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Garcia-Plaza, D. Serrano-Jimenez, J. Eloy-Garcia Carrasco, J. Alonso-Martinez, A Ni–Cd battery model considering state of charge and hysteresis effects. J. Power Sources 275(1), 595–604 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.H. Milocco, B.E. Castro, State of charge estimation in Ni–MH rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources 194(1), 558–567 (2009). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Xiao, W. Gao, X. Qiu, W. Zhu, J. Sun, L. Chen, Thermal behaviors of Ni–MH batteries using a novel impedance spectroscopy. J. Power Sources 182(1), 377–382 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Young, J. Koch, S. Yasuoka, H. Shen, L.A. Bendersky, Mn in misch-metal based superlattice metal hydride alloy—part 2 Ni/MH battery performance and failure mechanism. J. Power Sources 277(1), 433–442 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Banerjee, Y. Shilina, B. Ziv, J.M. Ziegelbauer, S. Luski, D. Aurbach, I.C. Halalay, On the oxidation state of manganese ions in Li-ion battery electrolyte solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(5), 1738–1741 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T.-S. Wei, B.Y. Ahn, J. Grotto, J.A. Lewis, 3D printing of customized Li-ion batteries with thick electrodes. Adv. Mater. 30(16), 1703027 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Yang, X. Ji, X. Fan, T. Gao, L. Suo et al., Flexible aqueous Li-ion battery with high energy and power densities. Adv. Mater. 29(44), 1701972 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Zhang, Y. Xiang, M.I. Jamil, J. Lu, Q. Zhang, X. Zhan, F. Chen, Polymers/zeolite nanocomposite membranes with enhanced thermal and electrochemical performances for lithium-ion batteries. J. Membr. Sci. 564(15), 753–761 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Lei, F. Wang, J. Yang, X. Gao, X. Yu et al., Embedding Co2P nanoparticles in N-doped carbon nanotubes grown on porous carbon polyhedra for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57(39), 13019–13025 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Y. Tong, Y. Xu, D. Chen, Y. Xie, L. Chen, M. Que, Y. Hou, Deformable and flexible electrospun nanofiber-supported cross-linked gel polymer electrolyte membranes for high safety lithium-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 7(37), 22728–22734 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M.J. Klein, G.M. Veith, A. Manthiram, Rational design of lithium-sulfur battery cathodes based on experimentally determined maximum active material thickness. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(27), 9229–9237 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. Qu, J. Zhang, A. Du, B. Chen, J. Chai et al., Multifunctional sandwich-structured electrolyte for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Sci. 5(3), 1700503 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Yan, X. Liu, B. Li, Capacity fade analysis of sulfur cathodes in lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Sci. 3(12), 1600101 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    N.B. Aetukuri, B.D. McCloskey, J.M. Garcia, L.E. Krupp, V. Viswanathan, A.C. Luntz, Solvating additives drive solution-mediated electrochemistry and enhance toroid growth in non-aqueous Li–O2 batteries. Nat. Chem. 7(1), 50–56 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    L. Wang, J. Pan, Y. Zhang, X. Cheng, L. Liu, H. Peng, A Li–air battery with ultralong cycle life in ambient air. Adv. Mater. 30(3), 1704378 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. Zhang, Y. Zhao, X. Zhang, Functional and stability orientation synthesis of materials and structures in aprotic Li–O2 batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(8), 2921–3004 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    X. Hu, Z. Li, J. Chen, Flexible Li–CO2 batteries with liquid-free electrolyte. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56(21), 5785–5789 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Li, Y. Dong, J. Zhou, Y. Liu, J. Wang, X. Gao, Y. Han, P. Qi, B. Wang, Carbon dioxide in the cage: manganese metal-organic frameworks for high performance CO2 electrodes in Li–CO2 batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 11(5), 1318–1325 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Y. Qiao, J. Yi, S. Wu, Y. Liu, S. Yang, P. He, H. Zhou, Li–CO2 electrochemistry: a new strategy for CO2 fixation and energy storage. Joule 1(2), 359–370 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    H. Li, Y. Ding, H. Ha, Y. Shi, L. Peng, X. Zhang, C.J. Ellison, G. Yu, An all-stretchable-component sodium-ion full battery. Adv. Mater. 29(23), 1700898 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. Zhao, C. Yu, B. Qiu, S. Zhou, M. Zhang et al., Ultrahigh rate and long-life sodium-ion batteries enabled by engineered surface and near-surface reactions. Adv. Mater. 30(7), 1702486 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    H. Kim, J.C. Kim, M. Bianchini, D.-H. Seo, J. Rodriguez-Garcia, G. Ceder, Recent progress and perspective in electrode materials for K-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8(9), 1702384 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    X. Wu, D.P. Leonard, X. Ji, Emerging non-aqueous potassium-ion batteries: challenges and opportunities. Chem. Mater. 29(12), 5031–5042 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    L. Chen, J.L. Bao, X. Dong, D.G. Truhlar, Y. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Xia, Aqueous Mg-ion battery based on polyimide anode and prussian blue cathode. ACS Energy Lett. 2(5), 1115–1121 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    B. Liu, T. Luo, G. Mu, X. Wang, D. Chen, G. Shen, Rechargeable Mg-ion batteries based on WSe2 nanowire cathodes. ACS Nano 7(9), 8051–8058 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M.C. Lin, M. Gong, B. Lu, Y. Wu, D.Y. Wang et al., An ultrafast rechargeable aluminium-ion battery. Nature 520(7547), 324–328 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. Xu, Y. Dou, Z. Wei, J. Ma, Y. Deng, Y. Li, H. Liu, S. Dou, Recent progress in graphite intercalation compounds for rechargeable metal (Li, Na, K, Al)-ion batteries. Adv. Sci. 4(10), 1700146 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    H. Li, C. Han, Y. Huang, Y. Huang, M. Zhu et al., An extremely safe and wearable solid-state zinc ion battery based on a hierarchical structured polymer electrolyte. Energy Environ. Sci. 11(4), 941–951 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    C. Xu, B. Li, H. Du, F. Kang, Energetic zinc ion chemistry: the rechargeable zinc ion battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51(4), 933–935 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    L. Chen, L. Zhang, X. Zhou, Z. Liu, Aqueous batteries based on mixed monovalence metal ions: a new battery family. Chemsuschem 7(8), 2295–2302 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    W. Zuo, W. Zhu, D. Zhao, Y. Sun, Y. Li, J. Liu, X.W. Lou, Bismuth oxide: a versatile high-capacity electrode material for rechargeable aqueous metal-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 9(9), 2881–2891 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    H. Kim, J. Hong, K.Y. Park, H. Kim, S.W. Kim, K. Kang, Aqueous rechargeable Li and Na ion batteries. Chem. Rev. 114(23), 11788–11827 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S. Santhanagopalan, Q. Guo, P. Ramadass, R.E. White, Review of models for predicting the cycling performance of lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 156(2), 620–628 (2006). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Huang, Y. Yuan, H. Li et al., Co3O4/Ni-based MOFs on carbon cloth for flexible alkaline battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices and near-infrared photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Electrochim. Acta 281(10), 189–197 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Y. Yuan, Y. Wu, T. Zhang, H. Tang, L. Meng, Y.-J. Zeng, Q. Zhang, Z. Ye, J. Lu, Integration of solar cells with hierarchical CoS nanonets hybrid supercapacitors for self-powered photodetection systems. J. Power Sources 404(15), 118–125 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    H. Tang, Y. Yuan, L. Meng, W. Wang, J. Lu, Y. Zeng, T. Huang, C. Gao, Low-resistance porous nanocellular MnSe electrodes for high-performance all-solid-state battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices. Adv. Mater. Technol. 3(7), 1800074 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    L. Meng, Y. Wu, T. Zhang, H. Tang, Y. Tian, Y. Yuan, Q. Zhang, Y. Zeng, J. Lu, Highly conductive NiSe2 nanostructures for all-solid-state battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices. J. Mater. Sci. 54(1), 571–581 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Q. Jiang, J. Lu, J. Zhang, Y. Yuan, H. Cai et al., Texture surfaces and etching mechanism of ZnO:Al films by a neutral agent for solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 130, 264–271 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    X. Wang, X. Han, M. Lim, N. Singh, C.L. Gan, M. Jan, P.S. Lee, Nickel cobalt oxide-single wall carbon nanotube composite material for superior cycling stability and high-performance supercapacitor application. J. Phys. Chem. C 116(23), 12448–12454 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    D. Weingarth, A.F. Schmitz, R. Kotz, Cycle versus volgate hold—Which is the better stability test for electrochemical double layer capacitors? J. Power Sources 225, 84–88 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    M. Vijayakumar, D.S. Rohita, T.N. Rao, M. Karthik, Electrode mass ration impact on electrochemical capacitor performance. Electrochim. Acta 298, 347–359 (2019). CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuliang Yuan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yangdan Lu
    • 1
  • Bei-Er Jia
    • 1
  • Haichao Tang
    • 1
  • Lingxiang Chen
    • 2
  • Yu-Jia Zeng
    • 3
  • Yang Hou
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  • Qinghua Zhang
    • 4
    • 5
  • Qinggang He
    • 4
    • 5
  • Lei Jiao
    • 6
  • Jianxing Leng
    • 6
  • Zhizhen Ye
    • 1
  • Jianguo Lu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials, School of Materials Science and EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument ScienceZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Laser Engineering, College of Optoelectronic EngineeringShenzhen UniversityShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.College of Chemical and Biological EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Ningbo Research InstituteZhejiang UniversityNingboPeople’s Republic of China
  6. 6.Ocean CollegeZhejiang UniversityZhoushanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations