Skip to main content
Log in

Pandemic crisis and firm survival: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry

  • Published:
Journal of Industrial and Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper studies the characteristics that affected firms’ ability to react to the economic crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic. We use firm-level data on Italian manufacturing companies to examine the role played by external relations and the characteristics of the local environment. In line with recent works, the study finds that micro-firms, highly indebted and less productive firms have a higher probability of exiting the market. Results also support the view that digital presence and financial soundness have favoured the survival of enterprises. Beyond firm-specific factors, we highlight that a firm’s resilience capability is related to its external linkages, namely the participation in a group or to a network contact. As for local ecosystem factors, while firms in industrial districts have a higher default probability, our results suggest that an innovative local environment can slightly mitigate the probability of permanently closing during the crisis.

Plain English Summary. Surviving the pandemic: Resilience through Unity?

The paper investigates firm survival in Italy at the onset and during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to individual characteristics, we focus on the role played by external relations and the characteristics of the local environment. Building on previous research on a firm’s resilience to shocks, the analysis considers traditional idiosyncratic determinants related to the internal organization (size, age, group membership, capitalization, profitability, productivity, debt maturity structure, …). and contextual, ecosystem factors. The study supports the view that specific individual factors (size, low debt and short-term exposure, productivity, presence of a website) have helped enterprises to waive the crisis. Besides, belonging to a group or a network contract is both associated with a lower probability of exiting the market in the period 2020–2022. Firms in traditional industries –fashion and furniture—have had a higher default probability than firms in other manufacturing industries. The location in industrial clusters increases the default probability with a moderating effect exerted by a specialization of the local labour system in the medium to high-tech industries and/or knowledge-intensive services. Finally, it is also worth noting that the region-specific length of lockdown policies is not significantly associated with firm survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this respect, it is worth mentioning that recent empirical studies providing evidence on the positive impact of digital development on firms’ survival are based on the World Bank’s Enterprise Surveys where the online presence is proxied by having own company’s website or social media page (i.e., Muzi et al., 2023; Wagner, 2021).

  2. First with the Cura Italia Legislative Decree (Decreto Legislativo Cura Italia) and then with the Liquidity Legislative Decree (Decreto Legislativo Liquidità), the intervention to support liquidity to firms was significantly strengthened in Italy by providing, among other things, eligibility without assessment of creditworthiness, the expansion of the group of beneficiaries, the increase in guarantee coverage (up to 100% for operations up to 30 thousand euros), the increase in the guaranteed amount per individual company and the expansion of the type of eligible operations. These measures exponentially increased the applications received by the Guarantee Fund for SMEs, preventing the flow of credit to businesses from drastically decreasing, as happened in previous economic crises.

  3. In Italy, business crisis is substantially identified with firm undercapitalization (i.e., the firm displaying a level of equity below the legal limit). Orlando and Rodano (2020) suggest that undercapitalization often anticipates firm’s exit: around 60 percent of involved firms go out of business within 3 years. According to their predictions, the number of firms that could be involved in early warning procedures may be almost twice as large as that foreseeable based on accounting data from 2018.

  4. We consider as “Default” firms whose legal status in the database AIDA-BvD is reported as “Ceased”, “Ceased– closure due to bankruptcy”, “Ceased in liquidation”, “In liquidation” or “Active enterprise in a state of insolvency”.

  5. In this case, the trade-off is between the loss of accuracy if one selects a procedure of outlier detection that remove “good” observations, and the bias of the estimates if the procedure keeps “bad” ones (anomalous observations).

  6. The IQR is a measure of data dispersion that represents the range of values that extends from the first quartile (25th percentile) to the third quartile (75th percentile) of the data distribution.

  7. We recognize that using the Interquartile Range (IQR) is a rather crude technique for the determination of outliers that are defined as observations that appear to deviate markedly from the rest of the sample (Grubbs, 1969). Nevertheless, as highlighted by Barbato et al. (2011), the main appeals of this method are simplicity and low sensitivity to distortion due to outliers (robustness), since only the central part of the distribution is relied upon to compute IQR. Barbato et al. (2011) also distinguish between mild and extreme outliers and since the major weakness of the conventional IQR method is its tendency to discard legitimate values in large data sets, they suggest using modified IQR methods. The latter may allow for conserving the most attractive features and introducing some variations to allow for discarding only very extreme values. In the same vein, we followed a rather unconventional but more conservative sieve criterion. The upper and lower limits are based on the 1st/99th percentiles instead of the conventional 25th/75th percentiles. This range was aimed at avoiding removing too many observations and thus excluding from the analysis only the very extreme outliers, as suggested by Barbato et al. (2011). The use of similar techniques is also recommended for data that present asymmetric distributions (Hubert and Van der Veeken, 2008).

  8. The procedure of data quality led to a slightly different distribution of firms relative to the reference population with micro-firms under-represented and small firms over-represented in the cleansed sample relative to the initial database while the share of the other size classes remained unchanged (Table A1 in the Appendix).

  9. The indicator is defined, for each LLS, as the ratio between the number of employees of the local units active in medium-tech industries (21 and 26, Nace Rev. 2), high-tech industries (Divisions 20, 27– 30, Nace Rev. 2) and knowledge-intensive sectors (Divisions 50, 51, 58– 63, 64– 66, 69– 75, 78, 80, 84– 93 excluding Division 84) and the total number of employees of the local units (Istat, 2022b). The taxomomy refers to Eurostat (2020).

  10. ATECO 2007 is the classification of economic activities used by the Italian Institute of Statistics (ISTAT). It correspond to the “Nomenclature statistique des activités économiques dans la Communauté européenne” (NACE), the statistical classification adopted in the European Union. The latest classification is NACE Rev. 2, which was implemented from 2007.

  11. Network contract is an industrial policy instrument introduced in the midst of the 2009 financial crisis by the Italian government within emergency legislation, Decree-Law No. 33/2009.

  12. The high-technology and medium high-technology industries are sets of economic sectors with the higher level of R&D intensity compared to the other categories, namely medium low-technology, and low-technology industries (European Commission, 2012). Services are mainly aggregated into knowledge-intensive services (KIS) and less knowledge-intensive services (LKIS) based on the share of tertiary educated persons at NACE 2-digit level (Eurostat, 2020).

  13. Firms that expected the restrictions to last for more than four months were more likely to implement strong responses to reduce fixed costs such as dismissing employees or cancelling investment projects than firms that expected a quick return to normalcy.

  14. Both Muzi et al., (2023) and Wagner (2021) found marginal effects that they consider to be large on average: from – 0.046 to – 0.051 and from – 0.048 to – 0.028, respectively.

References

  • Acharya, V. V., & Steffen, S. (2020). The risk of being a fallen angel and the corporate dash for cash in the midst of COVID. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9(3), 430–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, M., & Viganola, D. (2023). Does better access to finance help firms deal with the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from firm-level survey data. Journal of International Development, 35, 2578–2608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonioli, D., & Montresor, S. (2021). Innovation persistence in times of crisis: An analysis of Italian firms. Small Business Economics, 56, 1739–1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Mahmood, T. (1994). The rate of hazard confronting new firms and plants in U.S. manufacturing. Review of Industrial Organization, 9, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balduzzi, P., Brancati, E., Brianti, M., & Schiantarelli, F. (2020). The Economic Effects of COVID-19 and Credit Constraints: Evidence from Italian Firms’ Expectations and Plans, IZA DP No. 13629, August 2020.

  • Bankowska, K., Ferrando, A., Garcia, J.A., 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic and access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises: evidence from survey data. In: Economic Bulletin Issue 4/2020. ECB.

  • Barbato, G., Barini, E. M., Genta, G., & Levi, R. (2011). Features and performance of some outlier detection methods. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(10), 2133–2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, R., Pittiglio, R., & Reganati, F. (2017). Do agglomeration externalities affect firm survival?”. Regional Studies, 51(4), 548–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belitski, M., Guenther, C., Kritikos, A. S., & Thurik, R. (2022). Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses. Small Business Economics, 58, 593–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi, M., Santini, E., & Vecciolini, C. (2018). Learning, unlearning and forgetting processes in industrial districts. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(6), 1671–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., R. Fletcher, E. Yeh (2021), The Impact of COVID-19 on US Firms. Working Paper 28314

  • Bozkurt, İ., & Kaya, M. V. (2023). Foremost features affecting financial distress and Bankruptcy in the acute stage of COVID-19 crisis. Applied Economics Letters, 30, 1112–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brancati, E., Brancati, R., & Maresca, A. (2017). Global Value chains, innovation and performance: Firm-level evidence from the great recession. Journal of Economic Geography., 17(1), 1039–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchheim, L., Dovern, J., Krolage, C., & Link, S. (2022). Sentiment and firm behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 95, 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chundakkadan, R., Natarajan, R. R., & Sasidharan, S. (2022). Small firms amidst COVID-19: Financial constraints and role of government support. Economic Notes, 51(3), e12206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsini, S., & Pitingaro, S. (2022). I contratti di rete: una lettura per macroarea geografica. In A. Cabigiosu (Ed.), Osservatorio Nazionale sulle reti d’impresa 2022, Studi e ricerche sulle reti d’impresa (pp. 7–24). Venice University Press Venezia Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa S., De Santis, S., Dosi G., Monducci R, Sbardella A., Virgillito M.E. (2022) Firm responses to the COVID-19 crisis: sticky capabilities and widespread restructuring, Rivista di Statistica Ufficiale/Review of Official Statistics N. 1/2022

  • Cucculelli, M., & Peruzzi, V. (2020). Post-crisis firm survival, business model changes, and learning: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 54, 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrini, E., & Salvati, L. (2021). Unraveling spatial patterns of COVID-19 in Italy: Global forces and local economic drivers. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 13, 73–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Propris, S., & Storai, D. (2019). Servitizing industrial regions. Regional Studies, 53(3), 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vito, A., & Gómez, J.-P. (2020). Estimating the COVID-19 cash crunch: Global evidence and policy. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(2), 106741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dei Ottati, G. (1995). Tra mercato e comunità: aspetti concettuali e ricerche empiriche. Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didier, T., Huneeus, F., Larrain, M., & Schmukler, S. L. (2021). Financing firms in hibernation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Stability, 53, 100837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörr, J., Licht, G., & Murmann, S. (2022). Small firms and the COVID-19 insolvency gap. Small Business Economics, 58, 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Haddad, A., & Zaki, C. (2024). Storm survivors: Evidence from firms in times of pandemic. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 33, 165–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Knowledge Intensive (Business) Services in Europe. Berlin: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2020). High-tech industry and knowledge-intensive services (htech), Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/htec_esms.htm. Accessed 20 Mar 2024

  • Fairlie, R., & Fossen, F. (2022). The Early Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Business Sales. Small Business Economics, 58, 1853–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferragina A. M., Iandolo, S. (2022), Italian Firms Exposure, risk and sentiment to COVID-19: impact on credit behaviour and patrimonial status, in S. Capasso e G. Canitano (a cura di) Mediterranean Economies 2021– 2022, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2022 (ed. digit.: 2022, 10.978.8815/371034.

  • Ferragina, A. M., & Mazzotta, F. (2014). Local agglomeration economies: What impact on multinational and national Italian firms’ survival? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garicano, L., 2020. The COVID-19 bazooka for jobs in Europe. In: Baldwin, R., & diMauro, B.W. (Eds.), Mitigating the Covid Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever It Takes. VoxEU.org Book.

  • Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2023). Global coronavirus business closures: influences of executive gender, firm characteristics, and government involvement. Applied Economics, 55, 5384–5402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourinchas, P. O., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Penciakova, V., & Sander, N. (2022). COVID-19 and small- and medium-sized enterprises: A 2021 “time bomb”? AEA Paper Proceedings, 111, 282–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R.M., Iverson, B.C., & Thesmar, D., 2020. Sizing Up Corporate Restructuring in the COVID Crisis. NBER Working Paper, (w28104).

  • Grubbs, F. E. (1969). Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics, 11(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guibourg, C. (2020). A fraction of European regions account for a majority of COVID-19 deaths. EDJNet – The European Data Journalism Network. https://www.europeandatajournalism.eu/cp_data_news/a-fraction-of-european-regions-account-for-a-majority-of-covid-19-deaths/. Accessed 22 Jan 2023.

  • Ho, K.-C., Huang, H., Pan, Z., & Gu, Y. (2023). Modern pandemic crises and default risk: A worldwide evidence. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 34, 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, M., & Van der Veeken, S. (2008). Outlier detection for skewed data. Journal of Chemometrics: A Journal of the Chemometrics Society, 22(3– 4), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2022). Italy: Staff Concluding Statement of the 2022 Article IV Mission, May 19, 2022. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2022/05/19/italy-staff-concluding-statement-of-the-2022-article-iv-mission. Accessed 24 Jan 2023.

  • ISTAT. (2015). I distretti industriali 2011. ISTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT. (2021). Rapporto sulla competitività dei settori produttivi 2020. ISTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT. (2022a). Rapporto sulla competitività dei settori produttivi 2021. ISTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT. (2022b). Indicatori del sistema integrato dei registri su imprese e territorio, Roma. https://www.istat.it/storage/IstatData/SIR/Indic_SIR_1_met_ITA.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2022.

  • Kaya, O. (2022). Determinants and consequences of SME insolvency risk during the pandemic. Economic Modelling, 115, 105958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, Y. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on firms’ cost of equity capital: early evidence from U.S. public firms. Finance Research Letters, 15, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. U. (2022). Financing constraints and firm-level responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence. Research in International Business and Finance, 59, 101545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2017). Territorial servitization: Exploring the virtuous circle connecting knowledge-intensive services and new manufacturing businesses. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F., Arrighetti, A., & Lasagni, A. (2020). Economic crisis and firm exit: Do intangibles matter? Industry and Innovation, 27(5), 445–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., Sunley, P., Gardiner, B., & Tyler, P. (2016). How regions react to recessions: Resilience and the role of economic structure. Regional Studies, 50(4), 561–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza, N., Rahat, B., Naqvi, B., & Rizvi, S. A. (2020). Impact of covid-19 on corporate solvency and possible policy responses in the EU. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.09.002. in Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyakawa, D., Oikawa, K., & Ueda, K. (2021). Firm exit during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 59, 101118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzi, S., Jolevski, F., Ueda, K., & Viganola, D. (2023). Productivity and firm exit during the COVID-19 crisis: Cross-country evidence. Small Business Economics, 60, 1719–1760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, T., & Rodano, G. (2020). Firm undercapitalization in Italy: business crisis and survival before and after COVID-19. Bank of Italy Occasional Paper, (590).

  • Qin, X., Huang, G., Shen, H., & Fu, M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and firm-level cash holding—moderating effect of goodwill and goodwill impairment. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 56(10), 2243–2258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sforzi, F., & Boix, R. (2019). Territorial servitization in marshallian industrial districts: The industrial district as a place-based form of servitization. Regional Studies, 53(3), 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vo, T. A., Mazur, M., & Thai, A. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 economic crisis on the speed of adjustment toward target leverage ratio: an international analysis. Finance Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1994). The post-entry performance of new small firms in German manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2021). With a little help from my website Firm survival and web presence in times of COVID-19—evidence from 10 European countries. Economics Bulletin, 41(3), 1898–1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2022). World Development Report 2022: Finance for an equitable recovery.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that funds and grants were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Eleonora Cutrini acknowledges partial research support from the European Union—NextGenerationEU under the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) National Innovation Ecosystem grant ECS00000041—VITALITY – CUP D83C22000710005. Federico Ninivaggi acknowledges financial support from the European Union—European Social Fund, under the program "Innovative Doctorate" – PhD Scholarships for the innovation of the regional system- 2020 edition, Marche Region (Italy). This article was presented at the XXI Annual Workshop of the Italian Society for Industrial Economics and Industrial Policy (SIEPI) in Naples (June 15-16, 2023) and the 64° Congress of the Italian Economic Association in L’Aquila (October 19-21, 2023). We are grateful to the participants for their comments and suggestions on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleonora Cutrini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 298 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cutrini, E., Ninivaggi, F. Pandemic crisis and firm survival: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. J. Ind. Bus. Econ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-024-00309-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-024-00309-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation