Abstract
Background
Antimicrobials are drugs that are more likely to trigger the development of resistance naturally. Thus, they need to be prescribed, dispensed, and administered with greater caution. To underline the significance of their proper usage, antibiotics are divided as AWaRe: Access, Watch, and Reserve. Timely evidence on medicine use, prescribing patterns, and the factors affecting prescribing of antibiotic and their use percentage from AWaRe classification would help decision-makers to draft guidelines that can enable more rational use of medicines.
Methods
Prospective and cross-sectional study was conducted among seven community pharmacies in Dire Dawa to assess current prescribing practices related World Health Organization (WHO) indicators and AWaRe classification including antibiotic use and associated factors. Using stratified random sampling techniques, 1200 encounters were reviewed between 1 October and 31 October 2022, and SPSS version 27 was used for the analysis.
Results
The average of medications per prescription was 1.96. Antibiotics were included in 47.8% of encounters, while 43.1% were prescribed from the Watch groups. In 13.5% of the encounters, injections were administered. In multivariate models, patient age, gender, and the number of medications prescribed were significantly associated to prescription of antibiotics. Antibiotics were about 2.5 times more likely to be prescribed to patients under the age of 18 years than to subjects 65 years and older [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.88–5.42; P < 0.001]. Men were also more likely than women to receive an antibiotic prescription (AOR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.18–2.33; P = 0.011). Subjects who received more than two drugs were 2.96 times more likely to receive an antibiotic drug (AOR: 2.96, 95% CI: 1.77–6.55; P < 0.003). The probability of prescribing antibiotics was increased by 2.57 for every one-unit increase in the number of medications [crude odds ratio (OR): 2.57; 95% CI: 2.16–3.47; P < 0.002].
Conclusion
According to the present study, the amount of prescriptions with antibiotics at community pharmacies is much higher than the WHO standard (20–26.2%). The antibiotics prescribed from Access group were 55.3%, which is slightly lower than WHO recommended level (60%). The prescribing of antibiotics was significantly correlated to the patient’s age, gender, and number of medications.
The preprint version of the present study is available on Research Square with the following link: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2547932/v1.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1. The result of this study indicates that the trend of antibiotics prescribing and use patterns at community pharmacies deviates from the WHO’s recommended standards. |
2. The prescribing pattern of antibiotics by AWaRe classification in community pharmacies shows access groups are less than 60% of the WHO recommended level. |
3. Antibiotic prescriptions were significantly associated with the patient age, gender, and quantity of drugs prescribed. |
1 Background
Rational use of medications is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as providing the appropriate medication to the appropriate patient at the appropriate dose for the appropriate length of time and at the least expense possible to community [1, 2]. The use of medications in a way that is inconsistent with rational drug use is referred to as irrational use. It is frequently described in terms of polypharmacy, inappropriate antibiotic usage, excessive injectable use, noncompliance with clinical prescription recommendations, and inappropriate self-medication, frequently including prescription-only drugs [3, 4]. Medicines have a crucial role in both the prevention and treatment of disease, and they significantly contribute to human health and well-being [5]. By 2023, the global cost of pharmaceuticals is anticipated to surpass $1.5 trillion [6].
Recently, up to 50% of prescribed medications are incorrectly supplied or administered [7, 8]. Furthermore, numerous studies have supported the link between growing antibiotic overuse and the creation and spread of bacteria that are resistant to treatment [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The availability, equal access, and appropriate or sensible use of critical medications at an affordable price are very difficult to achieve globally, especially in low- and middle-income nations, due to the rare nature of a resource related to income needed to buy and use medication as per guidelines. Hence, the spending on drugs is related to the number of individuals per capita [8, 16, 17].
The WHO claims that antibiotic resistance is a serious public health issue that needs immediate response. The fact that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is currently thought to be a factor in more than 700,000 deaths annually and that it is anticipated to claim 10 million lives and cost $100 trillion by 2050 is not surprising [18, 19]. Conscious antibiotic use in the ambulatory setting contributes to the rational use of antibiotics generally since community-based antibiotic use represents a sizable portion of overall antibiotic use [20].
The WHO expert committee on the selection and use of essential medicines created the new classification of antibiotics in 2017 to underline the significance of their proper usage. The classification is termed as AWaRe, in which the antibiotics are divided into three categories—Access, Watch, and Reserve—as a tool to enhance antibiotic stewardship activities at the local, national, and global levels [21, 22]. These categories take into account the effects of various antibiotics and antibiotic classes on antimicrobial resistance [23]. According to this classification, antibiotics have been classified into three groups based on whether they need to be generally accessed, carefully watched, or only reserved for special situations [24]. A country-level goal of using Access-group antibiotics for at least 60% of all antibiotic usage is included in the WHO recommendations [23]. The new 2021 categorization was employed in the current investigation. A total of 258 antibiotics are included in the 2021 update of the AWaRe classification, up from 78 previously unclassified medications.
At different points in the drug use cycle, a variety of circumstances can promote irrational pharmaceutical usage. The most significant ones include lack of prescription control and regulation, unrestricted access to medications, procurement and distribution of medications not based on the Essential Medicines List (EML), financial incentives from pharmaceutical companies, inappropriate medication promotion, skewed information, and lack of appropriate knowledge and skills on the part of patients and providers [15, 25, 26].
Low and middle income countries (LMIC) struggle with an increased prevalence of infectious diseases, a scarcity of medicines, and a paucity of qualified medical personnel. When there is a lack of medications, doctors are more inclined to make illogical prescriptions [27, 28]. Low-income nations have greater rates of antimicrobial resistance than high-income nations, and developing nations have higher rates of irrational medication usage than the developed world [8, 29,30,31]. To assess the use of antibiotics in healthcare institutions, WHO and the International Network of Rational Medicine Use (INRMU) have developed a set of indicators. Prescription indicators, facility indicators, and patient care indicators make up the three key indicators. To support the implementation of Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) in healthcare settings including communities pharmacies, these indicators could be utilized as standards [31,32,33].
The main causes of the irrational use of medicine are also likely to alter over time; therefore, policymakers must stay informed of the most recent developments [13, 25]. For any involved stakeholders to take the necessary action, a frequent and timely examination of the prescribing pattern of medicines as part of rational usage is essential. There is insufficient recent evidence of prescribing pattern in community pharmacies at Dire Dawa. Although a study on Ethiopian public facilities shows a problem in the prescribing pattern and the AWaRe percentages, extrapolating the evidence to community pharmacies may not be possible due to coverage and service level difference [3, 5, 34,35,36,37,38,39].
Furthermore, the present study was aimed at evaluating the community pharmacies’ prescribing patterns using AWaRe classification and WHO prescribing indicators with their associated factors in a cross-sectional design at Dire Dawa, Ethiopia, and it may help to promote a better prescribing habit from the public and private health facilities to community pharmacies by providing important, timely information for all interested stakeholders.
2 Methods
2.1 Study Design
A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted prospectively in community pharmacies at Dire Dawa using a quantitative approach to assess prescribing pattern and factors associated with antibiotic prescribing by AWaRe classification and antibiotics prescribing indicators.
2.2 Study Setting and Period
The study was conducted in community pharmacies in the Dire Dawa City Administration from 1 October to 31 October 2022. Dire Dawa is one of the two chartered cities in Ethiopia (the other being the capital, Addis Ababa) with a population of 521,000. The administrative council consists of the city of Dire Dawa and the surrounding rural areas. The council has no administrative zones but has functional woredas (districts) for health-related activities. It is found at a road distance of 515 km from Addis Ababa. The city has a total of 2 public hospitals, 5 private hospitals, 15 health centers, 16 different level clinics, 31 community pharmacies, and 13 drug shops [38]. Nine community pharmacies representing the majority of the population were chosen for the study using the cluster sampling method based on their functional locations, or woredas. The majority of patients who cannot find their medicines inside the outpatient pharmacy departments of hospitals or health centers get their medicines from these community pharmacies. A “prescriber” in the context of the study and this article primarily refers to medical doctors, nurses, health officers, midwives, and psychiatric nurses who may prescribe depending on the setting and their profession.
2.3 Sample Size and Sampling Technique
The WHO recommends including at least 600 encounters when examining a facility’s present prescribing practices. The selection was done with a stratified random sample. The community pharmacies were categorized as strata, which was based on each functional district of the city administration. Random sampling was applied systematically within strata. Due to high service level, 1200 encounters were selected and then distributed proportionately. The total number of prescriptions from the community pharmacies in the study period was 27,920. Then, it was divided into 1200, and the 23rd prescription was chosen, and if the chosen prescription did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, the process continued to make the necessary number of samples.
2.4 Selection Criteria
The study only included prescriptions that contained at least one medicine; those that simply contained medical supplies or had illegible handwriting were disregarded from the inclusion. Eliminating prescriptions that were difficult to read helped to guarantee that only correct and trustworthy data were used in the assessment.
2.5 Data Collection Procedure
Three health professionals used prescription assessments to prospectively collect data. Data was collected from each prescription sent to community pharmacies per patient during the study period. The WHO standard prescription indicator collecting form was then filled out with all the information needed to measure the prescription indicators. A previously established definition by the WHO was used to avoid ambiguities in the terminologies [2, 3]. Data reliability was ensured by according to rules and procedures with a customized observational checklist that was prepared using prescribing manuals of the Ethiopian FDA and WHO [22, 40].
2.6 Data Quality Control
The principal investigators trained data collectors and supervisors, and the data collection checklist was pretested at a community pharmacy not in study before the actual data collection began. Data cleaning includes removal of prescriptions with only medical supplies and illegible hand writing. Following pilot results, necessary changes were made. Data were cleaned on a daily basis to remove inconsistencies and missing values.
2.7 Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
For statistical analysis, the gathered data were imported into the Census and Survey Processing System, CSPro version 7.7.0, and exported to SPSS version 27. To create descriptive summaries of the sociodemographic data, the mean and standard deviation were employed. The logistic regression method was used to investigate the relationship between antibiotic prescribing and its predictive factors. The variables used for binary regression were also used for the bivariate analysis. To do the multivariate analysis, variables were categorized according to age, gender, and the number of drugs. In all logistic regression analyses, the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was shown. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant in the study’s analyses.
3 Results
3.1 Sociodemographic Information
In terms of encounters per patient, a total of 1200 were included in the study, of which 54.7% of the patients were female and 45.3% were male with a median age of 29 years and 5 months [interquartile range (IQR): 40 years]. The age classification was based on the children and adults level by using ≤ 18, 19–64, and ≥ 65 years of age. The majority of patients, 737 (61.4%), were in the adult classification range. There was no age description written on 7.5% the prescriptions (Table 1).
3.2 Drug-Related Information
There were a total of 2354 individual drugs prescribed, with an average of 1.96 (0.32) medicines per prescription. The vast majority of medicines prescribed (99.2%) were on the Ethiopian essential medicine list. A large proportion of prescription papers contained one drug (31.5%), two drugs (38.4%), and three drugs (15.1%).
The use of standard prescriptions with an identification card number that is legally registered in Ministry of Health documentation of records among community pharmacies was 82.8%. The name (98.3%), gender (94%), and age (92.5%) of the patient were the most commonly recorded patient-related information, while the patient’s weight (14.3%) and address (11.8%) were the least recorded patient-related information (Table 2).
The frequency of administration (96.1%), dose (85.5%), and method of medication administration (84.6%) were the most often listed drug-related details on prescriptions. The class of medications that were most frequently administered was antimicrobials (35.3%), followed by cardiovascular medications (24.1%) and analgesics (16.5%).
3.3 WHO Prescribing Indicators
The assessment of prescribing pattern using the WHO prescribing indicators revealed that the percentage of encounters with antibiotics was 47.8% and the percentage of injectable was 13.5%. From injectable, analgesics were the most commonly prescribed, and ceftriaxone was the most common antibiotic prescribed as an injection. The percentage of drugs prescribed with a generic name was 87.3% and from the Ethiopian EML was 99.2%. The total number of antibiotics prescribed was 832 (35.3%) of all prescribed medications (Fig. 1).
3.4 Healthcare-Professional-Related Information
From the 1200 encounters assessed, 934 (77.8%) contained the prescriber’s name, while 997 (83.1%) contained the prescriber’s signature. The dispensers’ names were available in 416 (34.7%), and signatures were available in 752 (62.7%) prescription papers (Fig. 2).
3.5 AWaRe Classification
Access groups cover 55.3% of prescribed medications, Watch groups cover 43.1%, and Reserve groups cover 1.7%. Amoxicillin (47.2%), amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (13.3%), and metronidazole (10.7%) were the most regularly administered antibiotics from Access group, whereas ciprofloxacin (54.2%) and ceftriaxone (34.4%) were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics from Watch group. Two medications, meropenem and vancomycin, that were observed in the prescriptions were classified as Reserve group (Table 3).
3.6 Antibiotic Prescribing Predictors
Age (P < 0.001), gender (P < 0.003), and number of medications (P = 0.011) were significant predictors of antibiotic prescribing, according to bivariate analysis of the significance of each variable effect. Antibiotic prescriptions were 2.5 times more likely to be given to people under the age of 18 years than to people 65 years and older (AOR: 2.51, CI: 1.88–5.42). Similarly, men received antibiotic prescriptions more frequently than women (AOR: 1.74; CI: 1.18–2.33). Patients who took three or more medications were prescribed 3 times as many antibiotics as those who only received one or two medications (AOR: 2.96, CI: 1.77–6.55) (Table 4).
A model fitness test was performed to confirm its suitability, and the analysis model containing all predictors was found to be statistically significant [χ2 (5, N = 1200) = 63.291, P < 0.001], which indicated that the model was able to distinguish between the respondents who had been prescribed antibiotics and those who had not. Hosmer and Lemeshow’s test supported the model’s fitness [χ2 = 12.523, degrees of freedom (df) = 7, P = 0.572]. The model successfully identified 73.3% of those who got an antibiotic prescription and explained between 55.3% (Cox and Snell R squared) and 76.6% (Nagelkerke R squared) of the variance in antibiotic prescriptions.
The model’s sensitivity test revealed that it properly recognized 64.2% of the group with an antibiotic prescription, and the specificity was 69.8%. After correcting for relevant confounders with multivariate logistic regression, age (P < 0.001), gender (P = 0.011), and number of drugs prescribed (P < 0.017) remained substantially linked with antibiotic prescribing (Table 5). With an increase in the number of drugs prescribed, there is a significant rise in antibiotic prescribing (P < 0.002). For every unit increase in the number of drugs provided, the probabilities of prescribing antibiotics increased by 2.57 units (crude OR: 2.57; 95% CI: 2.16–3.47).
4 Discussion
4.1 Prescribing Pattern Indicators
In the current study, the patient’s name, age, and gender were mentioned in more than 89% of the prescription papers included in the study. It is expected that all prescription papers should bear all these components for rational dispensing, but these variables were not mentioned in a complete way in the study of the prescription papers. The percentage of prescription papers on which the date was written was 81.2%; when compared with studies done in Ethiopia and other parts of the world, this was relatively higher than some findings [42,43,44], which were 73.9–77.3%, lower than findings from some previous similar studies [45, 46], which were 83.1–93.5%, and comparable to the study done by Gashaw et al. [47], which was 81.3%.
To underline the significance of their proper usage, antibiotics are divided into three categories—Access, Watch, and Reserve—as per WHO Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines [21, 22]. These categories take into account the effects of various antibiotics and antibiotic classes on antimicrobial resistance. A total of 258 antibiotics are included in the 2021 update of the AWaRe classification, up from 78 previously unclassified medications. Hence, it is a helpful instrument for keeping tabs on antibiotic usage, setting goals, and assessing the results of stewardship programs that are intended to maximize antibiotic use and reduce antimicrobial resistance. In the present study, 55.3% of the antibiotics prescribed were from the Access group, which is lower than the study carried out in Eritrea, which was 71.9% [12]. In addition, 43.1% of the antibiotics were in the Watch group, and 1.68% were in the Reserve group. The Reserve group drugs were specifically vancomycin and meropenem. The result of this study is higher than the Watch group and Reserve group percentages in the aforementioned study [12], which were 22.1% and 0%, respectively. From all medications used in the Watch category, 54.2% were ciprofloxacin, while 34.4% were ceftriaxone. This drugs use must therefore be closely monitored both in the community and in public facilities.
All prescription papers needs to have a date on them for both retrieval and legal reasons. In this study, 98.3% of the prescription papers contained the patient’s name, which is greater than the results from comparable studies carried out in Dessie, Harar, and Jimma, Ethiopia, which reported 94.7%, 93.3%, and 93.9%, respectively [46,47,48]. It falls short of research done in Gondar and Dilla, Ethiopia, where the results were 99.8% and 99.7%, respectively [42, 45]. To identify patients during the dispensing process, prescribers should be aware of the significance of writing the patient’s name on each and every prescription paper. The percentage of prescription papers with age of patients written in the current study was 92.4%, which is consistent with a study conducted in Bahir Dar and Dessie, Ethiopia, where 92.6% and 93.5% were reported [43, 46]. The result is lower than previous studies conducted in Mekelle (96.7%) [37] and Dilla (95.4%) [45], and greater than study findings from Gondar (86.6%) [42], Khartoum (78.0%) [49], and Western India (74.6%) [50]. Age has a key role in dosage estimations and the selection of appropriate dosage forms, especially for the pediatric population. About 89.9% of prescription papers in the current study have gender indicated; this result was greater than that of similar studies done India (72.4%) [50], Gondar (64.6%) [42], Eastern Ethiopia (67.9%) [47], and lower than that of similar studies done in Ethiopia: Bahir Dar (92.1%) [43], Dilla (99.6%) [45] and Dessie (95%) [46]. If prescribers fail to include diagnoses on prescription documents, pharmacy staff will be unable to analyze prescription orders. Therefore, to promote the best possible treatment results for patients, they should include diagnoses on every single prescription paper.
Drug doses were recorded on 85.5% of prescription papers, which is greater than many findings from studies performed similarly in Ethiopia, Sudan, and India, which indicated a range between 27.4% and 82.9%, but lower than those from Dilla and Jimma, whose results were 94.9% and 89.8%, respectively [42,43,44, 46, 47, 49, 51]. The type of dosage form was disclosed on 437 (18.9%) prescription papers, which is comparable with research from Dessie (17.6%) and Mizan, Ethiopia (17.9%) [46, 51]. The result, however, is lower than that of the study conducted in Harar (32.7%) and higher than those from Bahir Dar (8.3%) and Jimma (11.45%) in Ethiopia [44, 47, 48]. The method of drug administration was noted on 84.6% of prescription papers in the current study, which is roughly equivalent to findings from Harar (81.8%) [47] and Dessie (82.2%) [46] in Ethiopia, but less than previous studies of a comparable studies that reported between 88.1% and 93.1% [45, 48, 51].
The frequency of drug administration was disclosed on prescription papers in about 96.1% of encounters, which is greater than the percentage reported in other research of a similar nature done in various regions of Ethiopia, which ranged from 6.4% to 93.3% [42,43,44,45,46,47,48, 52]. The proportion of prescription papers that specified the length of the therapy was 75.2%, which is comparable to findings from a study in Bahir Dar (74.61%) [43], but lower than those studies done in Dessie (80.1%) and Gondar (82%), Ethiopia [42, 46]. However, compared with other research findings, which range from 20% to 74.6%, this figure is higher [44, 45, 47, 50, 51]. Prescribers should be curious enough to write an entire pharmacotherapy regimen so that pharmacy professionals can assess the appropriateness of therapeutic orders. As a result, optimal therapeutic patient outcomes are significantly influenced.
In the current study, some reasons why prescribers might not have written every part of a typical prescription order may include patient load, a failure to see the value of doing so, neglect, and/or the lack of a measuring device nearby. Even though each element of a prescription paper might not have the same function, it is still a professional necessity to write down every single piece of information. To ensure the accuracy of every prescription paper, all stakeholders, including pharmacy staff, should be included, in addition to the prescriber’s own obligation.
For the 1200 patients with prescriptions that visited the community pharmacy in Dire Dawa as part of the current study, a total of 2354 individual medications were prescribed, resulting in an average of 1.96 prescriptions prescribed each encounter, which is slightly higher than the WHO standard (1.6–1.8) [2], as well as results from the comparable investigations carried out across Ethiopia, which revealed an average of 1.64–1.90 medications per encounter [1, 36, 42,43,44,45, 53, 54]. However, compared with several other study results from Ethiopia, Sudan, India, and Saudi Arabia, which found an average value of 2.02–4.2 medicines per encounter, this number is lower [31, 32, 46, 47, 49, 50, 55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. Prescribers should restrict medicine prescriptions to only those that are absolutely essential because polypharmacy can expose patients to unfavorable drug effects and raise patient costs.
There could be a number of causes for the high prescription rate for antibiotics. The high level of routine empirical treatments observed in resource-poor nations is primarily a result of the increased occurrence of infectious diseases in developing countries, which increases the number of antibiotics prescribed. The other factor can be patient pressure on doctors. Antibiotic self-medication was reported to be 44–45.1% common in Ethiopia and Eritrea, according to several studies and a comprehensive review [12, 66, 67]. This finding may indicate that patients are more likely to directly or indirectly request antibiotic prescriptions from doctors, as they are heavily involved in self-medicating with antibiotics.
The percentage of encounters in this study when at least one antibiotic was prescribed was 47.8%, which is much higher than the WHO standard value of 20–26.2% [2] and indicates antibiotic misuse is there. This result is comparable with the result of Atif et al. (48.6%) [68]. Similar studies carried out in various nations indicated that a percentage of encounters with antibiotics were between 9.1% and 43%, which is less than the result reported by the current study [32, 42,43,44, 59, 62,63,64]. On the other hand, this result was lower than those of other comparable studies with 52.3–75.1% [1, 36, 45, 47, 49, 50, 53, 54, 57, 58, 60, 61, 68].
An urgent global issue that has an effect on, among other things, infection control efforts and the price of antimicrobial therapy is antimicrobial resistance, which is on the cusp of indiscriminate antibiotic prescribing practice. Overprescribing of this class of medication is discouraged. In the current study, 87.3% of the medications were prescribed by generic name, which is less than the WHO standard, which calls for all drug prescriptions to be written in generic names. This result is equivalent to that from Mengistu et al. [46] and is greater than several findings published from studies conducted in other nations [12, 32, 44, 45, 50, 57,58,59, 61,62,63, 68], while being lower than some other study findings from Ethiopia, Ghana, Iran, and Saudi Arabia [1, 36, 42, 43, 47, 53,54,55, 63].
When a certain brand of drug is not available, prescriptions written with the generic name enable dispensers to substitute therapeutic equivalents, and generic medications are less expensive, allowing broader market accessibility. Because a brand-name prescription could be expensive for the patient, health professionals are urged to recommend generic medicine names instead. Encounters with 13.5% of injectable were recorded in the current study, which is in line with the WHO standard (13.4–24.1%) [2]. In the current study, 99.2% of pharmaceuticals were prescribed from the nation’s EML, which is slightly similar to WHO standard (100%).
4.2 Antibiotic Prescribing Predictors
This study found a strong correlation between the prescription of antibiotics and the patients’ age, gender, and number of medications. Being under the age of 18 years has also been indicated to be highly related with antibiotic prescriptions. Therefore, as compared with other patient groups, patients under the age of 18 years got the majority of antibiotics. This result is comparable to studies done in Eritrea [12], Bangladesh [69], Yemen [70], and Cameroon [71]. This study found that men received antibiotics more frequently than women, which is comparable to studies from Bangladesh [69] and Ethiopia [72]. The result is in contrast to a study conducted in the UK [73], Cameroon [71], and Switzerland [74], which found a stronger correlation between female gender and the prescription of antibiotics. According to the current study, prescribing three or four drugs per prescription is significantly related to prescribing antibiotics.
The odds ratio of using an antibiotic increased by 2.57 for every increment in unit of medication This was consistent with research from Eritrea, which found that probabilities increased by 2.02 for every one-unit increase (P < 0.001; OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.62–2.52) [12], and Zambia, where it was shown that odds rise by 2.7 for every one-unit increase (P < 0.001; OR = 2.68, 95% CI: 2.20–3.25) [75]. Because the current study was cross-sectional, the results might not accurately reflect the seasonal variation in medication use. Furthermore, the study’s findings could not be applicable to the entire country because they were based on the city of Dire Dawa. More study at the national level is necessary to get a complete picture of how medicines are used in the country.
5 Conclusion
The findings of the present investigation showed that the prescribing indicators in the public community pharmacy in Dire Dawa, Ethiopia, significantly deviated from the acceptable WHO standard for the prescription of antibiotics. In comparison to the WHO-recommended level (20–26.2%), 47.8% of prescriptions contained an antibiotic. Antibiotics prescribed from Watch group was 43.1%, which was proportionally high in percentage, while Access group accounts for 55.3%, which is slightly lower than the WHO recommended 60%. About 13.5% of the encounters contained an injection, which is within the range of 13.4–24.1% advised by the WHO. The average number of prescriptions per encounter and adherence to EML were just marginally below WHO-recommended levels. Antibiotic prescribing revealed a substantial correlation with patient age, gender, and the number of drugs per prescription. As a result, both prescribers and patients must consider antibiotic resistance and reasonable use, and additional research will be required to generalize the findings.
References
Dessie B, Atalaye G, Diress E, Getahun A. Practice towards rational drug use at Finotselam and Asirade Zewudie Hospitals based on WHO core drug use indicators, northwest Ethiopia. Sci World J. 2020;2020:1–5.
Ghei P. How to investigate drug use in health facilities: selected drug use indicators. Health Policy. 1995;34:73.
AyalewGetahun K, SitotieRedia A, Jemere AT. Evaluation of medicine-use pattern using World Health Organization’s core drug-use indicators and completeness of prescription at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Gondar, Ethiopia: cross-sectional study. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2020;9:219–27.
Chaturvedi VP, Mathur AG, Anand AC. Rational drug use—as common as common sense? Med J Armed Forces India. 2012;68(3):206–8.
Sema FD, Asres ED, Wubeshet BD. Evaluation of rational use of medicine using WHO/INRUD core drug use indicators at Teda and Azezo Health Centers, Gondar Town, northwest Ethiopia. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2021;10:51–63.
Aitken M, Kleinrock M, Simorellis A, Nass D. The global use of medicine in 2019 and outlook to 2023. IQVIA Inst Hum Data Sci. 2019;(January):1–56.
Pariente N. The antimicrobial resistance crisis needs action now. PLoS Biol. 2022;20: e3001918.
Lanckohr C, Bracht H. Antimicrobial stewardship. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2022;28(5):551–6.
Al-Ishaq RK, Abotaleb M, Kubatka P, Kajo K, Büsselberg D. Flavonoids and their anti-diabetic effects: cellular mechanisms and effects to improve blood sugar levels. Biomolecules. 2019;9(9):1–35.
Wojkowska-Mach J, Godman B, Glassman A, Kurdi A, Pilc A, Rozanska A, et al. Antibiotic consumption and antimicrobial resistance in Poland; findings and implications. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7(1):8–10.
Zhang D, Cui K, Lu W, Bai H, Zhai Y, Hu S, et al. Evaluation of carbapenem use in a tertiary hospital: antimicrobial stewardship urgently needed. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1):1–7.
Amaha ND, Weldemariam DG, Abdu N, Tesfamariam EH. Prescribing practices using WHO prescribing indicators and factors associated with antibiotic prescribing in six community pharmacies in Asmara, Eritrea: a cross-sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1):1–7.
Ciofu O, Moser C, Jensen PØ, Høiby N. Tolerance and resistance of microbial biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20(10):621–35.
Samreen AI, Malak HA, Abulreesh HH. Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: a potential threat to public health. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021;27:101–11.
Min S, Zhou Y, Sun Y, Ye J, Dong Y, Wang X, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice associated with antimicrobial resistance among medical students between 2017 and 2022: a survey in East China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1010582.
Landis MS, Lynam MM, Stevens RK. The monitoring and modelling of Hg species in support of local, regional and global modelling. In: Pirrone N, Mahaffey KR, editors. Dynamics of mercury pollution on regional and global scales: atmospheric processes and human exposures around the world. USA, Boston: Springer; 2005. p. 123–51.
O’Keefe D, Stoové M, Doyle J, Dietze P, Hellard M. Injecting drug use in low and middle-income countries: opportunities to improve care and prevent harm. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24(9):714–24.
Tadesse BT, Ashley EA, Ongarello S, Havumaki J, Wijegoonewardena M, González IJ, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Africa: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):1–17.
Morrison L, Zembower TR. Antimicrobial resistance. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020;30(4):619–35.
Gutema G, Ali S, Suleman S. Trends of community-based systemic antibiotic consumption: comparative analyses of data from Ethiopia and Norway calls for public health policy actions. PLoS One. 2021;16:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251400.
Bansal A, Sharma R, Prakash R. Adoption of the World Health Organization access, watch reserve index to evaluate and monitor the use of antibiotics at a tertiary care hospital in India. Perspect Clin Res. 2022;13(2):90–3.
De Vries T, Henning R, Hogerzeil H, Fresle D. Guide to good prescribing. World Health Organization. 2000;1–142. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/59001
Yin J, Li H, Sun Q. Analysis of antibiotic consumption by AWaRe classification in Shandong Province, China, 2012–2019: a panel data analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:2012–9.
Adekoya I, Maraj D, Steiner L, Yaphe H, Moja L, Magrini N, et al. Comparison of antibiotics included in national essential medicines lists of 138 countries using the WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(10):1429–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30854-9.
Ofori-Asenso R, Brhlikova P, Pollock AM. Prescribing indicators at primary health care centers within the WHO African region: a systematic analysis (1995–2015). BMC Public Health. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3428-8.
Mao W, Vu H, Xie Z, Chen W, Tang S. Systematic review on irrational use of medicines in China and Vietnam. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):1–16.
Azevedo MJ. The state of health system(s) in Africa: challenges and opportunities. In: Historical perspectives on the state of health and health systems in Africa, vol II: the modern era. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 1–73.
Grigoryan L, Germanos G, Zoorob R, Juneja S, Raphael JL, Paasche-Orlow MK, et al. Use of antibiotics without a prescription in the U.S. Population a scoping review. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(4):257–63.
Song P, Li W, Zhou Q. An outpatient antibacterial stewardship intervention during the journey to JCI accreditation. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014;15(1):1–9.
Vialle-Valentin CE, Lecates RF, Zhang F, Desta AT, Ross-Degnan D. Predictors of antibiotic use in African communities: evidence from medicines household surveys in five countries. Trop Med Int Heal. 2012;17(2):211–22.
Atif M, Azeem M, Saqib A, Scahill S. Investigation of antimicrobial use at a tertiary care hospital in Southern Punjab, Pakistan using WHO methodology. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6(1):1–12.
Atif M, Sarwar MR, Azeem M, Umer D, Rauf A, Rasool A, et al. Assessment of WHO/INRUD core drug use indicators in two tertiary care hospitals of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016;9(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-016-0076-4.
Ahmadi F, Zarei E. Prescribing patterns of rural family physicians: a study in Kermanshah Province, Iran. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–7.
Asmamaw G, Ejigu N, Tewihubo D, Ayenew W. Assessment of private health sector prescribing patterns and adherence to prescription format using World Health Organization core drug use indicators in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022;15(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-022-00408-0.
Bilal AI, Osman ED, Mulugeta A. Assessment of medicines use pattern using World Health Organization’s Prescribing, Patient Care and Health facility indicators in selected health facilities in eastern Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1414-6.
Desalegn AA. Assessment of drug use pattern using WHO prescribing indicators at Hawassa University teaching and referral hospital, south Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):170.
Yilma Z. Assessment of drug prescription pattern in Mekelle General Hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia, using World Health Organization prescribing indicators. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1–6.
Mishore KM, Bekele NA, Yirba TY, Abone TF. Evaluation of drug use pattern in Emergency Department of Dilchora Referral Hospital, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Emerg Med Int. 2020;2020:1–6.
Melku L, Wubetu M, Dessie B. Irrational drug use and its associated factors at Debre Markos Referral Hospital’s outpatient pharmacy in East Gojjam, northwest Ethiopia. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:205031212110251.
EFDA. Manual for medicines good prescribing practice, 2nd edn. Food, Medicine and Healthcare Administration and Control Authority (FMHACA) of Ethiopia; 2012. Available from www.masterprintingpressplc.com
OMS. World Health Organization model list of essential medicines. Ment Holist Health Some Int Perspect. 2019;21:119–34.
Admassie E, Begashaw B, Hailu W. Assessment of drug use practices and completeness of prescriptions in Gondar University Teaching Referral Hospital. IJPSR. 2013;4(1):265–75.
Asrade B. Assessment of completeness of prescription and rational drug use practice at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, north west Ethiopia. J Health Med Nurs. 2019;60:16–25.
Yilma Z, Mekonnen T, Siraj EA, Agmassie Z, Yehualaw A, Debasu Z, et al. Assessment of prescription completeness and drug use pattern in Tibebe-Ghion Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Bahir Dar Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8842515.
Bekele NA, Tadesse J. Prescription auditing based on World Health Organization (WHO) prescribing indicators: a case of Dilla University Referral Hospital. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2018;8:21–5.
Mengistu G, Misganaw D, Tsehay T, Alemu BK, Bogale K. Assessment of drug use pattern using WHO core prescribing indicators at outpatient settings of governmental hospitals in Dessie town. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2020;12:237–44.
Gashaw T, Sisay M, Mengistu G, Amare F. Investigation of prescribing behavior at outpatient settings of governmental hospitals in eastern Ethiopia: an overall evaluation beyond World Health Organization core prescribing indicators. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018;11(1):1–11.
TsegayeMelaku K, Gizat MK. Assessment of prescribers’ adherence to the basic standards of prescription order writing in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, southwest Ethiopia. Experiment. 2014;19(1):1316–29.
Rabie D, Kheder SI. Assessment of prescribing and dispensing practices based on WHO core prescribing indicators in hospital and community pharmacies in Khartoum State-Sudan. J Med Inf Decis Making. 2020;1:1–11.
Shelat PR, Kumbar SK. Analysis of out door patients’ prescriptions according to World Health Organization (WHO) prescribing indicators among private hospitals in Western India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12724.5632.
Ayele T, Tsehay T, Bedada H. Prescribers’ Adherence to the Basic Principles of Prescription Order Writing in a Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia. Indo Am J Pharm Res. 2017;7(8):499-503
Gizework A, Seyfe AA. Assessment of the pattern of antibiotics use in pediatrics ward of Dessie Referral Hospital, north east Ethiopia. Int J Med Med Sci. 2015;7(1):1–7.
Tigist G, Yohannes T, Mekonnen S. Evaluation of the prescribing practice based on World Health Organization core prescribing indicators in Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Harar, eastern Ethiopia. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2016;6(6):25–30.
Kasahun GG, Demoz GT, Asayehegn AT, Gebremeskel L. Evaluation of pattern of drug use in tertiary health care setting in central evaluation of pattern of drug use in tertiary health care setting in central Tigray using WHO prescribing indicators. Adv Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;(August):5–9.
Akodo J, Chijioke-Nwauche I. Evaluation of drug use pattern in Lulu Brigg’s Health Centre, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria using WHO, prescribing indicators. Pharma Innov J. 2017;6(9):506–10.
El MAA. WHO/INRUD drug prescribing indicators at primary health care centres in Eastern province, Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. 2012;18(11):1091–6.
Enato EFO, Chima IE. Evaluation of drug utilization patterns and patient care practices. West African J Pharm. 2011;22(1):36–41.
Otoom S, Batieha A, Hadidi H, Hasan M, Al-Saudi K. Evaluation of drug use in Jordan using WHO patient care and health facility indicators. East Mediterr Health J. 2002;8(4-5):544–549.
Prasad PS, Rudra JT, Vasanthi P, Sushitha U, Sadiq MJ, Narayana G. Assessment of drug use pattern using World Health Organization core drug use indicators at Secondary Care Referral Hospital of South India. Chrismed J Health Res. 2015;2(3):223.
Sisay M, Mengistu G, Molla B, Amare F, Gabriel T. Evaluation of rational drug use based on World Health Organization core drug use indicators in selected public hospitals of eastern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–9.
Yousif BME, Supakankunti S. General practitioners’ prescribing patterns at primary healthcare centers in National Health Insurance, Gezira, Sudan. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2016;3(3):327–32.
Angamo MT, Wabe NT, Raju NJ. Assessment of patterns of drug use by using World Health Organization’s prescribing, patient care and health facility indicators in selected health facilities in southwest Ethiopia. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2011;1(7):62–6.
Akl OA, El Mahalli AA, Elkahky AA, Salem AM. WHO/INRUD drug use indicators at primary healthcare centers in Alexandria, Egypt. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2014;9(1):54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2013.06.002.
Mahmood A, Elnour AA, Ali AAA, Hassan NAGM, Shehab A, Bhagavathula AS. Evaluation of rational use of medicines (RUM) in four government hospitals in UAE. Saudi Pharm J. 2016;24(2):189–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2015.03.003.
Mamo DB, Alemu BK. Rational drug-use evaluation based on World Health Organization core drug-use indicators in a tertiary referral hospital, northeast Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2020;12:15–21.
Ateshim Y, Bereket B, Major F, Emun Y, Woldai B, Pasha I, et al. Self medication practice and associated factors among students of Asmara College of Health Sciences, Eritrea: a cross sectional study. J Pharm Policy Practice. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-019-0165-2.
Mekonnen S, Getnet M, Dumessa E. Epidemiology of self-medication in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;19(1):1–12.
Atif M, Sarwar MR, Azeem M, Naz M, Amir S, Nazir K. Assessment of core drug use indicators using WHO/INRUD methodology at primary healthcare centers in Bahawalpur, Pakistan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1932-2.
Syed A, Mosaddek M. Prescribing practice of antibiotics for outpatients in Bangladesh: rationality analysis. Am J Pharmacol. 2018;1(1):1008.
Alshakka M, Said K, Babakri M, Ansari M, Aldhubhani A, Azmi Hassali M, et al. A study on antibiotics prescribing pattern at outpatient department in four hospitals in Aden-Yemen. J Pharm Pract Commun Med. 2016;2(3):88–93.
Chem ED, Anong DN, Akoachere JFKT. Prescribing patterns and associated factors of antibiotic prescription in primary health care facilities of Kumbo East and Kumbo West Health Districts, North West Cameroon. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):1–18.
Alemayehu Gube A, Gonfa R, Tadesse T. Evaluation of antibiotic use in medical ward of Fitche District Hospital, North Showa Zone, Oromia Region Ethiopia. Adv Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;6:2167.
Smith DRM, Dolk FCK, Smieszek T, Robotham JV, Pouwels KB. Understanding the gender gap in antibiotic prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of English primary care. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):1–7.
Streit S, Frey P, Singer S, Bollag U, Meli DN. Clinical and haematological predictors of antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in adults in Swiss practices—an observational study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):4–9.
Lukali V, Michelo C. Factors associated with irrational drug use at a district hospital in Zambia: patient record-based observations. Med J Zambia. 2015;42(1):25–30.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the Dire Dawa City Administration Health Bureau for their permission to do the study, as well as all technical managers and the seven community pharmacies’ employees, who helped us a lot in facilitating data collection. Our deep appreciation also goes to data collectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BD, AW, and AM contributed to the original data and designed the study, BD and AM performed analysis and interpreted the data; BD and SY obtained the data; BD and AW wrote the first draft; BD, AW, AM, and SY critically reviewed and edited the manuscript for important intellectual content. BD oversaw the project. All authors read and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
BD, AW, AM, and SY declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.
Funding
This study received no specific funding from public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.
Availability of Data and Material
On reasonable request, the data used and analyzed during this study can be obtained from the corresponding author.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dereje, B., Workneh, A., Megersa, A. et al. Prescribing Pattern and Associated Factors in Community Pharmacies: A Cross-Sectional Study Using AWaRe Classification and WHO Antibiotic Prescribing Indicators in Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Drugs - Real World Outcomes 10, 459–469 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-023-00367-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-023-00367-1