1 Introduction

Bark coal is a special humic coal and was first reported by Hsieh (1933). In China, bark coals are mainly located in Leping area of Jiangxi Province, Changguang area of Zhejiang Province, and Shuicheng area of Guizhou Province (Sun 2002). Typical bark coal is often characterized as high hydrogen content, high sulfur content, high fusibility, high swelling ability, and high tar yield (Hsieh 1933; Dai et al. 1984; Ren et al. 1963; Han et al. 1996). The major maceral composition of bark coal is the barkinite. However, the term “barkinite” has not been recognized by the International Committee for Coal and Organic Petrology (ICCP). Barkinite is often used as suberinite or cutinite (Han et al. 1983; Dai et al. 1984).

It was reported that bark coal was deposited under brackish and turbulent environment (Chen 1995). Besides, based on the value of pH and the ratio of Sr/Ba, the coal-forming environment of bark coal was under weakly alkaline and strong reducing conditions. The source material of barkinite maybe come from psaronius, pteridosperm, the root of giantopteris plants (Chen and Chen 1996), or from lepidodendron or other plants (Yan and Li 1958; Wang et al. 1998). By now, the depositional environment and source materials of bark coal is still in vague.

There are few reports published about the aromatic hydrocarbon geochemistry of bark coal. However, aromatic hydrocarbon has a strong resistance to biodegradation, and play significant roles in depositional environment and organic matter evolution. Furthermore, coal petrology study is also widely used to instruct the coal formation environment (Singh et al. 2017; Ameh 2019). So, in this work, in order to further discuss the depositional environment of bark coal, the characteristics of coal petrology and saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons in bark coal were discussed.

2 Samples and experiments

A total of 7 bark coal samples were collected from the C2 coal seam of 6012 mining faces at six coal mines in Changguang, Zhejiang Province, China. The average depth of the working faces is about 612 meters, and the coal seam in the sampling position is 1.65 meters in thickness. Samples were marked as CG2-1, CG2-2, CG2-3, CG2-4, CG2-4, CG2-6, CG2-7. CG2-3 was collected as the parting sample. Proximate and ultimate analysis were performed following the China National Standard of GB/T 30732—2014 (2014) and GB/T 31391—2015 (2015), separately. Rock–Eval pyrolysis and determination of total organic carbon were conducted according to China National Standard of GB/T 18602—2012 (2012) and GB/T 19145—2003 (2003), respectively. In the Rock–Eval pyrolysis experiment, the initial temperature of pyrolysis is at 300 °C (holding on 3 min), and then the temperature rose at a rate of 25 °C/min to 800 °C. Gas chromatographic (GC) analysis was performed on an Agilent gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector (FID). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was carried out on a DSQII 08070173 mass spectrometer, equipped with a trace GC Ultra gas chromatograph. GC and GC–MS were determined following standards of SY/T 5779—2008 (2008) and GB/T 18340—2010 (2010) respectively.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Basic characteristics

The basic properties of the samples used are listed in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the volatile matter yields of samples are generally high, ranging from 34.04% to 39.85%. The hydrogen contents range from 5.41% to 6.05%, which is consistent with the characteristic of high hydrogen content in bark coal based on previous studies (Ren et al. 1963; Han et al. 1996). The samples are mainly composed of inertinite and liptinite, which contribute 14.7%–41.8% and 54.3%–83.3% of the total, respectively. Barkinite is the major maceral composition in liptinite and CG2-5 sample have the largest barkinite content reaching 83.3%. The difference between barkinite and other macerals can be easily observed under white light irradiation are shown in Fig. 1. The barkinite typically occur together with inertodetrinite and macrinite (Fig. 1a–c). The mean maximum vitrinite reflectance of the samples is with an average of 0.90%.

Table 1 Basic characteristics of samples used
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Photomicrographs of occurrence of barkinite with other macerals of samples. a barkinite with inertodetrinite (ID); b, c barkinite with macrinite (M); d oil matter (OM) in barkinite. (These photos were observed under white light irradiation)

Full size image

3.2 Hydrocarbon-generation potential analysis

3.2.1 Type of organic matter

The type of organic matter can be divided into Type I, Type II1, Type II2, and Type III (Yang et al. 1981). The ratio values of O/C and H/C atomic of the samples are in the range of 0.03–0.06 and 0.76–0.87, separately. As described in Fig. 2, all samples are dropped into the junction of Type II1–Type II2 kerogen field.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Modified from Yang et al. (1981)

The O/C and H/C correlation diagram of CG2 samples.

Full size image

3.2.2 Maturity of organic matter

The results from Rock–Eval pyrolysis of the samples used are listed in Table 2. The mean maximum vitrinite reflectance (Ro,max) and the S2 peak at its maximum pyrolysis temperature (Tmax) are common parameters to evaluate organic matter maturity. The mean values of Ro,max (Table 1) and Tmax (Table 2) for 6 samples are with an average of 0.90% and 449 °C, respectively, indicating CG2 samples are in the mature stage (Hunt 1996).

Table 2 Rock-Eval parameters of the samples used
Full size table

3.2.3 Organic matter abundance

The pyrolysis parameters and total organic carbon (TOC) can be used to evaluate the hydrocarbon-generation potential of organic matter in source rocks. From Table 2, TOC values range from 65.80 wt% to 87.00 wt%, corresponding with the potential yields (S1 + S2) ranging from 170.43 to 232.89 mg HC/g, and the hydrogen index (HI) from 234 to 295 mg HC/g TOC. These parameters indicate that these coal samples have good hydrocarbon-generation potential.

3.3 Aromatic hydrocarbons

3.3.1 Aromatic hydrocarbons composition and content

Aromatic hydrocarbons are good indicators to instruct the sedimentary environment, source materials, and degree of thermal evolution. The aromatic spectra obtained from GC–MS analyses are shown in Fig. 3. The relative abundance of some aromatic compounds were detected from aromatic hydrocarbons, including naphthalenes, phenanthrenes, biphenyls, fluorenes, dibenzofurans, dibenzothiophens, chrysene, and benzopyrenes (Table 3). From Table 3, phenanthrene series compounds occupy the largest proportion of 43.48%–53.74% in the total aromatic hydrocarbon contents, with an average of 47.28% (n = 6). Followed by the content of F–OF–SF series and naphthalene series, ranging from 8.41%–19.63% and 5.49%–11.91%, separately.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mass chromatograms of aromatic hydrocarbons for the samples used

Full size image
Table 3 Relative abundances of aromatic hydrocarbons and the ratios of biomarkers
Full size table

3.3.2 Characteristics of aromatic hydrocarbons

3.3.2.1 Naphthalene series

The naphthalene series can be used for suggesting source characterization, sedimentary condition and maturity assessment (Powell and Boreham 1994). From Table 3, the naphthalene series have an average content of 9.34%, indicating the source input of CG2 samples may be come from the a mixed of lower aquatic plants and higher terrestrial plants, but mainly higher plants. In addition, the relatively high naphthalene contents also illustrate the seawater influence during the depositional process.

1,2,5-trimethylnaphthalene (1,2,5-TMN) is an isomer of trimethylnaphthalene (TMN), converted from pentacyclic triterpenes through degradation and rearrangement. The ratio of 1,2,5-TMN/1,3,6-TMN is lower than 0.30 in marine crude oil, but in continental crude oil, the ratio is higher than 0.30 (Zhu et al. 1998). The ratios of 1,2, 5-TMN/1,3, 6-TMN for CG2 samples ranging from 1.28 to 2.21, suggesting CG2 samples were deposited under the influence of marine. The main source inputs of CG2 sample are from terrestrial higher plants.

Methylnaphthalene ratio (MNR) is another maturity index in alkylated naphthalenes compounds. The average value of MNR in the samples are 0.86 (n = 4) (Table 4). The values of trimethylnaphthalene ratio 1 (TNR1) and trimethylnaphthalene ratio 2 (TNR2) are in the range of 0–0.58 and 0.32–1.67, separately. These results imply the thermal maturities of the samples are in the mature stage. The distribution of trimethylnaphthalene ratio (TMNr) and tetramethylnaphthalene ratio (TeMNr) also can reflect the degree of organic matter thermal evolution. The values of TMNr and TeMNr of the samples used range from 0%–0.32% and 0.55%–0.60%, respectively, indicating the thermal evolution degrees of the samples are in the mature stage.

Table 4 Organic geochemical parameters of aromatic hydrocarbons
Full size table
3.3.2.2 Phenanthrene series

The phenanthrene series also occupy a large proportion in the aromatic hydrocarbons. Radke et al. (1982) proposed that the methylphenanthrene index (MPI), commonly used as a maturity indicator, has good linear relationship with the vitrinite reflectance. The values of MPI1 are in the range of 0.59–0.84. The methylphenanthrene ratio F1 and F2 of the samples range from 0.34–0.37 and 0.13–1.45, respectively, indicating the samples are in the mature stages (Kvalheim et al. 1987), which is consistent with the results from naphthalenes.

3.3.2.3 F–OF–SF series

F–OF–SF series include fluorene (F), dibenzofuran (OF) and dibenzothiophene (SF), which are good indicators to instruct the sedimentary environment (Li and He 2008). F, OF, and SF have similar chemical structure and may come from the same precursor. This precursor has a basic skeleton-a five-membered ring. The No.9 carbon on five-membered ring belong to an α-C atom, which is easy to be replaced to SF under reduction conditions and oxidized to OF under weak oxidation or weak reduction conditions (Lin et al. 1987). Previous studies have found it is inaccurate to judge the paleoenvironment during organic matter formation by the single or relative content of F, OF, and SF. The ratio of SF/OF is more reasonable to instruct the depositional environment, with the marine facies or brackish lakes facies showing the SF/OF ratio > 0.7 (Meng et al. 2011). In this work, the F–OF–SF series account for 8.41%–19.63% in total aromatic hydrocarbons. Samples have high SF contents, but low F and OF contents (Fig. 4). The ratios of SF/OF for test samples vary from 6.65 to 70.36, suggesting the depositional environment of bark coal were under marine or brackish lakes environment. This is an important depositional condition for the formation of bark coal and is in good agreement with the previous studies that bark coal was deposited under marine environment (Yan et al. 1994; Chen 1995).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The triangular diagram of F–OF–SF series of the samples

Full size image

The plot of ∑SF/∑(F + SF) versus ∑OF/∑(F + OF) is more sensitive to distinguish the transitional environment (Fig. 5) (Li and He 2008). From Fig. 5, all samples were dropped into F decrease, OF and SF increase area, suggesting the depositional conditions of the samples are in high salinity environment. CG2-6 and CG2-7 were dropped into high SF content showing strong reduction conditions. This may be due to CG2-6 and CG2-7 two coal seams were most influenced by the marine environment, but it needs more evidence and further discussion.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Modified from Li and He (2008)

The ∑SF/∑(F + SF) and ∑OF/∑(F + OF) diagram of the samples.

Full size image

The dibenzothiophene/phenanthrene (DBT/P) and Pr/Ph of crude oil was classified into 5 sedimentary environment and lithology categories according to the results of Hughes et al. (1995) (Table 5). The correlation diagram of the samples used are shown in Fig. 6. As shown in Fig. 6, all samples were fallen within zone 3, indicating CG2 samples were deposited under marine and lacustrine environment, in accordance with the above results.

Table 5 Correlation between DBT/P and Pr/Ph from different environments (Hughes et al. 1995)
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

Modified from Hughes et al. (1995)

DBT/P and Pr/Ph diagram for the samples used.

Full size image
3.3.2.4 Diphenyl and chrysene series

The contents of diphenyl and chrysene of samples range from 0.10%–0.78% and 2.14%–12.33%, respectively (Table 3). Diphenyl seem to be derived from the lignin of higher plants. The high content of diphenyl suggests the terrestrial higher plants dominating in the source input. Chrysene present a negative correlation with naphthalene, implying the chrysene series compounds may be related to the lower aquatic organisms (Tissot et al. 1973). These suggest that the source materials of CG2 coal samples may be influenced by lower aquatic organisms, but is still dominated by higher plants. Chen and Chen (1996) obtained the similar results of source materials of bark coal from the saturated hydrocarbon derived from gas chromatogram.

3.4 Saturated hydrocarbons

Terpenoid are the cyclic isoprene compounds which has strong thermal stability and resistance to microbial degradation. The distributions of homohopane (C31–35) obtained from m/z 191 mass fragmentograms by GC–MS analyses of the samples used are depicted in Fig. 7. The homohopane indices (C35/C31–35) could be used to represent the redox potential during organic matter deposition (Peters and Moldowan 1993). The low content of C35 homohopane suggest the samples were deposited under relatively oxic environment. Pristine (Pr) and phytane (Ph) are two important acyclic isoprenoids hydrocarbons which are commonly used to reflect the environmental conditions of sedimentary organic matter (Didyk et al. 1978; Volkman and Maxwell 1986). The values of Pr/Ph of samples used vary from 1.26 to 2.20 (Table 3). The low ratios of Pr/Ph and C35/C31–35 homohopane suggest bark coal samples may be deposited under relatively oxic conditions, consistent with the previous researches by Yan and Li (1958). However, Han et al. (1983) and Chen and Chen (1996) considered the bark coal was formed under a reduction environment during coal formation process. In this study, as demonstrated by the ratios of SF/OF and plot of Pr/Ph versus DBT/P, bark coal was thought to deposit under marine or brackish lakes environment. According to the plot of ∑SF/∑(F + SF) versus ∑OF/∑(F + OF), CG2-6 and CG2-7 two samples seem to deposit under high salinity and strong reduction conditions. This may be due to the strong marine or brackish lakes effect on the two coal seams, which is in accordance with the previous studies that bark coal was influenced by discontinuous marine environment during formation process (Chen and Chen 1996). However, the high inertinite content (14.7%–41.8%) of the samples verify that the relatively oxic conditions during bark coal formation is possible (Feng et al. 2019), as discussed in Sect. 3.1. In conclusion, bark coal in Changguang area is considered to form under relatively oxic conditions and influenced by marine or brackish lakes environment. But to further explain the redox conditions and the degree of marine effect on bark coal during formation process, more bark coal samples are needed and various analytical methods are required.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The m/z 191 mass fragmentograms of saturated hydrocarbon fractions for samples used

Full size image

4 Conclusions

Multiple aromatic hydrocarbons and some saturated hydrocarbons indicators as well as the pyrolysis parameters of bark coal in Changguang area were studied by the methods of Rock–Eval pyrolysis, GC and GC–MS analyses, providing indicative significance of sedimentary environment, source materials, and the degree of thermal evolution of bark coal.

  1. (1)

    According to the H/C–O/C diagram, all CG2 samples were classified into Type II kerogen. The values of Tmax and Ro, and the ratios of alkylated naphthalenes and phenanthrenes suggesting the samples are in the mature stage.

  2. (2)

    The values of TOC, HI, S1 + S2 from Rock–Eval pyrolysis range from 65.80 wt%–87.00 wt%, 170.43–232.89 mg HC/g, and 234–295 mg HC/g TOC, respectively, indicating the samples have good hydrocarbon generation potential.

  3. (3)

    The high content of naphthalene series compounds indicate an input of terrestrial higher plants during bark coal-forming process. However, the low diphenyl and high chrysene content imply a source of lower aquatic organisms. This indicates the source materials of the samples are predominated by terrestrial higher plants, but mixed with some lower aquatic organisms.

  4. (4)

    Combined with the biomarkers (Pr/Ph, C35/C31–35 homohopane), aromatic hydrocarbons (F, OF, SF), maceral compositions, and microscopic characteristics, bark coal is considered to form under relatively oxic conditions and influenced by marine or brackish lakes environment during formation process.