Abstract
The robust vocabularies acquired by neurotypical children are impossible to account for by direct instruction alone, and as such incidental acquisition must play a role. A variety of explanations for the source of this exponential language growth have been put forth by theorists across related disciplines. We provide our general reflections on interactions that exist among the possible sources of incidental language acquisition that have been put forth by both behavior-analytic and cognitive perspectives. We first consider the behavior-analytic perspectives of bidirectional naming (BiN), stimulus equivalence (SE), and relational frame theory (RFT). Next, we consider the cognitive perspective of fast mapping. We also provide comparisons between the behavior-analytic principle of exclusionary performance, and the cognitive principles of mutual exclusivity and the principle of contrast as additional sources for incidental acquisition of novel object–word labels and meanings. We reflect on points of contact and departure between these cross-disciplinary theories of human language and cognition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not Applicable
References
Baldwin, D., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Word learning: A window on early pragmatic understanding. In E. Clark (Ed.), The proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 7, 3–23. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44(1), 91.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69–84.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Luciano, C., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). From the IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(4), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.08.001
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Smeets, P. M. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with opposite as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4(3).
Barnes-Holmes, D., Finn, M., McEnteggart, C., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2018). Derived stimulus relations and their role in a behavior-analytic account of human language and cognition. Perspectives on Behavioral Science, 41(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0124-7
Barnes-Holmes, D., & Harte, C. (2022). The IRAP as a measure of implicit cognition: A case of Frankenstein’s Monster. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 45(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00352-z
Belisle, J. (2020). Model dependent realism and the rule-governed behavior of behavior analysts: Applications to derived relational responding. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43, 321–342.
Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and form. Longman.
Cahill, C. S., & Greer, R. D. (2014). Actions vs. words: How we can learn both. Acta de Investigacion Psicologica, 4(3), 1717–1746.
Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In M. Halle, G. Miller, & J. Bresnan (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 264–293). MIT Press.
Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers & Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17–29.
Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8(6), 500–508.
Choi, J. (2012). Effects of mastery of auditory match-to-sample instruction on echoics, emergence of advanced listener literacy, and speaker-as-own-listener cusps by elementary school students with ASD and ADHD. (Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, 2012). Abstract from: UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations [online].
Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. Cognitive Development & Acquisition of Language, 1973, 65–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-505850-6.50009-8
Clark, E. V. (1983a). Convention and contrast in acquiring the lexicon. In Concept development and the development of word meaning (pp. 67–89). Springer.
Clark, E. V. (1983b). Meanings and concepts. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. )
Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 1–33). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conceição, D. B., Greer, R. D., & Moschella, J. L. (2022). A general outline of the verbal behavior developmental theory. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 24, 1–39.
Dixon, L. (1977). The nature of control by spoken words over visual stimulus selection. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of 8ehavior, 27, 433–442.
Fiorile, C. A., & Greer, R. D. (2007). The induction of naming in children with no echoic-to-tact response as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 23, 71–88.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Morson, E. (2019). Fast mapping is a laboratory task, not a cognitive capacity. Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(4), 223–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2019.1573810
Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Hahn, E. R. (2007). Fast mapping skills in the developing lexicon. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 50(3), 682–697.
Gilic, L., & Greer, R. D. (2011). Establishing naming in typically developing children as a function of multiple exemplar speaker and listener experiences. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 157–178.
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bailey, L. M., & Wenger, N. R. (1992). Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 99.
Greer, R. D., & Keohane, D. D. (2005). The evolution of verbal behavior in young children. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 1, 31–48.
Greer, R. D., & O'Sullivan, D. (2007). Preliminary report of naming for 2-dimensional stimuli in typically developing first graders. In unpublished report, Columbia University Teachers College. Paper presented at the annual international conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Diego, CA.
Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. Allyn & Bacon.
Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2009). The integration of speaker and listener responses: A theory of verbal development. The Psychological Record, 59, 448–499.
Greer, R. D., & Du, L. (2010). Generic instruction versus intensive tact instruction and the emission of spontaneous speech. The Journal of Speech and Language Pathology–Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(1), 1.
Greer, R. D., & Longano, J. (2010). Naming a rose: How we may learn to do it. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26, 73–106.
Greer, R. D., & Du, L. (2015a). Experience and the onset of the capability to learn the names of things by exclusion. The Psychological Record, 65, 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0111-2
Greer, R. D., & Du, L. (2015b). Identification and establishment of reinforcers that make the development of complex social language possible. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(1), 1–22.
Greer, R. D., Stolfi, L., Chavez-Brown, M., & Rivera-Valdes, C. (2005). The emergence of the listener to speaker component of naming in children as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 123–134.
Greer, R. D., Stolfi, L., & Pistoljevic, N. (2007). Emergence of naming in preschoolers: A comparison of multiple and single exemplar instruction. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8, 109–131.
Greer, R. D., Corwin, A., & Buttigieg, S. (2011a). The effects of the verbal developmental capability of naming on how children can be taught. Acta de Investigacion Psicologia, 1(1), 23–54.
Greer, R. D., Pistoljevic, N., Cahill, C., & Du, L. (2011b). Effects of conditioning voices as reinforcers for listener responses on rate of learning, awareness, and preferences for listening to stories in preschoolers with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 103.
Greer, R. D., Pohl, P., Du, L., & Moschella, J. L. (2017). The separate development of children’s listener and speaker behavior and the intercept as behavioral metamorphosis. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 7(13), 674–704. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbbs.2017.713045
Hart, B., & Risley, R. T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H. Brookes.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30-million-word gap by age 3. American educator, 27(1), 4–9.
Hawkins, E., Gautreaux, G., & Chiesa, M. (2018). Deconstructing common bidirectional naming: A proposed classification framework. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 34, 44–61.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.) (2001). Relational frame theory. Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Heibeck, T. H., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Word learning in children: An examination of fast mapping. Child Development, 58(4), 1021–1034.
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 185–241.
Horst, J. S., Samuelson, L. K., Kucker, S. C., & McMurray, B. (2011). What’s new? Children prefer novelty in referent selection. Cognition, 118(2), 34–244.
Hranchuk, K., Douglas Greer, R., & Longano, J. (2019). Instructional demonstrations are more efficient than consequences alone for children with naming. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 35(1), 1–20.
Kleinert-Ventresca, K., Greer, R. D., & Baldonado, L. (2023). More complex incidental bidirectional naming results from exposure alone. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 119(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.847
Kucker, S. C., & Seidler, E. (2023). The time scales of word learning in children with language delays: In-the-moment mapping, retention, and generalization. Journal of Child Language, 50, 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000817
Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56(2), 201–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1993.1032
Longano, J. M., & Greer, R. D. (2015). Is the source of reinforcement for naming multiple conditioned reinforcers for observing responses? Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0022-y
Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Pro-Ed.
Luciano, C., Becerra, I. G., & Valverde, M. R. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.08-06
Luciano, C., Rodriguez, M., Manas, I., & Ruiz, F. (2009). Acquiring the earliest relational operants: Coordination, distinction, opposition, comparison, and hierarchy. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities: A progressive guide to change (pp. 149–172). New Harbinger.
Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121–157.
McDuffie, A., Yoder, P., & Stone, W. (2006). Fast-mapping in young children with autism spectrum disorders. First Language, 26(4), 421–438.
McGuinness, D. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. MIT Press.
McGuinness, D. (2005). Language development and learning to read: The scientific study of how language development affects reading skill. MIT Press.
McIlvane, W. J., Kledaras, J. B., Munson, L. C., King, K. A., Rose, J. C. D., & Stoddard, L. T. (1987). Controlling relations in conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48(2), 187–208.
Miguel, C. F. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(2), 125–138.
Miguel, C. F. (2018). Problem-solving, bidirectional naming, and the development of verbal repertoires. Behavior Analysis: Research & Practice, 18(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000110
Miguel, C. F., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2009). Naming and frames of coordination. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 129–148). Context Press.
Morgan, G. A., Greer, R. D., & Fienup, D. M. (2021). Descriptive analyses of relations among bidirectional naming, arbitrary, and nonarbitrary relations. The Psychological Record, 71(3), 367–387.
O’Connor, R. J., Lindsay, S., Mather, E., & Riggs, K. J. (2019). Why would a special FM process exist in adults, when it does not appear to exist in children? Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(4), 221–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2019.1574260
Rosales-Ruiz, J., & Baer, D. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: A developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(3), 533–544.
Rothstein, M. B., & Gautreaux, G. G. (2007). The effects of a peer-yoked contingency on observational learning and the collateral emergence of naming. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4(2), 453.
Samuelson, L. K., & McMurray, B. (2017). What does it take to learn a word? WIREs Cognitive Science, 8, e1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1421
Schauffler, G., & Greer, R. D. (2006). The effects of intensive tact instruction on audience-accurate tacts and conversational units. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavioral Interventions, 3(1), 120–132.
Sidener, D. W. (2006). Joint control for dummies: An elaboration of Lowenkron’s model of joint (stimulus) control. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 119–122.
Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.
Sidman, M. (1992). Adventitious control by the location of comparison stimuli in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58(1), 173–182.
Sivaraman, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Greer, R. D., Fienup, D. M., & Roeyers, H. (2023). Verbal behavior development theory and relational frame theory: Reflecting on similarities and differences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 119(3), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.836
Sivaraman, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roeyers, H. (2021). Non-simultaneous stimulus presentations and their role in listener naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 116(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.715
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Copley.
Speckman-Collins, J., Park, H. L., & Greer, R. D. (2007). Generalized selection-based auditory matching and the emergence of the listener component of naming. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4(2), 412–429.
Spiegel, C., & Halberda, J. (2011). Rapid fast mapping abilities in 2-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(1), 132–140.
Stokes, S. F., & Klee, T. (2009). Factors that influence vocabulary development in two-year-old children. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 50, 498–505.
Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J., Partington, J. W., & Sundberg, C. A. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 21–37.
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Behavior Analysts.
Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. (1994). Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30, 639–650.
Wilkinson, K. M., Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1998). Fast mapping and exclusion (emergent matching) in developmental language, behavior analysis, and animal cognition research. The Psychological Record, 48, 407–422.
Yoon, J. S., Greer, R. D., Virk, M., & Fienup, D. M. (2023). The establishment of incidental bidirectional naming through multiple exemplar instruction: A systematic replication. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 39, 86–98.
Funding
Not funding received
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Second author conceived the manuscript and provided ongoing edits and feedback. First author expanded on the conception, designed, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval/Consent to Participate
Not Applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hranchuk, K., Greer, R.D. General Reflections on Interactions between Cross-Disciplinary Theories of Human Language Development. Psychol Rec (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-024-00588-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-024-00588-y