Abstract
A recent systematic review has highlighted that the terms “pliance,” “tracking,” and “augmenting” have rarely been used as the basis for conducting systematic experimental-analytic research since their conception in 1982, despite their theoretical centrality to the study of rule-governed behavior and their presumed impact on psychological suffering. Given that some time has passed since the review article, it may be useful to reflect again upon their place within the literature on the experimental analysis of human behavior, and relational frame theory in particular. As such, the current article constitutes a “position piece” rather than another formal systematic review. In reviewing (informally) the literature since the systematic review, the recent emergence of psychometric research involving these concepts could be seen as reinforcing the original conclusions, in that researchers are recognizing that pliance, tracking, and augmenting may be of limited value in the experimental analysis of human behavior. Instead, the concept of rule-governed behavior itself, as well as the subcategories of pliance, tracking, and augmenting, should be considered middle-level terms, which lack the relative precision of more technical terms within the literature on relational frame theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We would also note that other articles have been published since our informal review of the literature (in April 2020) that could be seen as broadly relevant (e.g., Ghezzi, Houmanfar, & Crosswell, 2020; Ruíz et al., 2020). However, the general argument we are advancing in the current “position” article, that rule-governed behavior, and thus pliance, tracking, and augmenting, are best considered middle-level terms, are not fundamentally challenged by the publication of these additional articles.
It is also worth noting that some of the leading researchers who have argued for the value of middle-level terms in behavioral psychology have recently questioned the use of traditional psychometry itself in favor of idiographic, process-based research (Hayes et al., 2019). Thus, the use of nomothetic psychometrics in support of the concepts of pliance, tracking and augmenting could be challenged further in the newly emerging idiographic, process-focused era.
References
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Luciano, C., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). From IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.08.001.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McEnteggart, C. (2020). Updating RFT (more field than frame) and its implications for process-based therapy. The Psychological Record, 70, 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00372-3.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Hussey, I., McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Foody, M. (2016). Scientific ambition: The relationship between relational frame theory and middle level terms in acceptance and commitment therapy. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science (pp. 365–382). Wiley-Blackwell.
Barnes-Holmes, D., O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R. T., & Lyddy, F. (2001). Understanding and verbal regulation. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 103–118). Plenum.
Baruch, D. E., Kanter, J. W., Busch, A. M., Richardson, J. V., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2007). The differential effect of instructions on dysphoric and nondysphoric persons. The Psychological Record, 57, 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395594.
Bern, R., Persdotter, T., Harte, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2020). Relational coherence and persistent rule-following: The impact of targeting coherence in a “non-critical” component of a relational network. The Psychological Record. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00414-1.
Fagerstrøm, A., Stratton, J. P., & Foxall, G. R. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility activities on the consumer purchasing situation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35, 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1093053.
Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McEnteggart, C. (2018). Exploring the single-trial-type-dominance-effect in the IRAP: Developing a differential arbitrarily applicable responding effects (DAARE) model. The Psychological Record, 68(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0262-z.
Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., McEnteggart, C., & Kavanagh, D. (2019). Predicting and influencing the single-trial-type-dominance-effect: The first study. The Psychological Record, 69(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00347-4.
Ghezzi, E. L., Houmanfar, R. A., & Crosswell, L. (2020). The motivative augmental effects of verbal stimuli on cooperative and conformity responding under a financially competing contingency in an analog work task. The Psychological Record, 70, 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00400-7.
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McEnteggart, C. (2018). The impact of high versus low levels of derivation for mutually and combinatorially entailed relations on persistent rule-following. Behavioural Processes, 157, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.08.005.
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). Persistent rule-following in the face of reversed reinforcement contingencies: The differential impact of direct versus derived rules. Behavior Modification, 41(6), 743–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517715871.
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Kissi, A. (2020a). The study of rule-governed behavior and derived stimulus relations: Bridging the gap. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43, 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00256-w.
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., McEnteggart, C., Gys, J., & Hassler, C. (2020b). Exploring the potential impact of relational coherence on persistent rule-following: The first study. Learning & Behavior, 48, 373–391. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-019-00399-0.
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McEnteggart, C. (2020c). Exploring the impact of coherence (through the presence versus absence of feedback) and levels of derivation on persistent rule-following. Learning and Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-020-00438-1.
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Moreira, M., de Almeida, J. H., Aparecida-Passarelli, D., & de Rose, J. C. (2021). Exploring a Training IRAP as a single participant context for analyzing reversed derived relations and persistent rule-following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.671.
Hayes, S. C. (2016). Why contextual behavioral science exists: An introduction to part I. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 9–16) Wiley-Blackwell.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. Guilford Press.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Plenum.
Hayes, S. C., Hofmann, S. G., Stanton, C. E., Carpenter, J. K., Sanford, B. T., Curtiss, J. E., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapy. Behavior Research & Therapy, 117, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.005.
Kissi, A., Hughes, S., De Schryver, M., De Houwer, J., & Crombez, G. (2018). Examining the moderating impact of plys and tracks on the insensitivity effect: A preliminary investigation. The Psychological Record, 68, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0286-z.
Kissi, A., Hughes, S., Mertens, G., Barnes-Holmes, D., De Houwer, J., & Crombez, G. (2017). A systematic review of pliance, tracking, and augmenting. Behavior Modification, 41(5), 683–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517693811.
McAuliffe, D., Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). The dark-side of rule governed behavior: An experimental analysis of problematic rule-following in an adolescent population with depressive symptomatology. Behavior Modification, 38(4), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514521630.
O’Connor, M., Byrne, P., Ruiz, F. J., & McHugh, L. (2019). Generalized pliance in relation to contingency sensitivity and mindfulness. Mindfulness, 10, 833–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1046-5.
O’Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54, 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395484.
O’Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Stewart, I. (2014). Antecedent and consequential control of derived instruction-following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.95.
Rafacz, S. D., Houmanfar, R. A., Smith, G. S., & Levin, M. E. (2019). Assessing the effects of motivational augmentals, pay-for-performance, and implicit verbal responding on cooperation. The Psychological Record, 69, 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0324-x.
Rehfeldt, R. A., & Hayes, L. J. (1998). The operant-respondent distinction revisited: Toward and understanding of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395266.
Ruiz, F. J., García-Martín, M. B., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., Bedoya-Valderrama, L., Segura-Vargas, M. A., Peña-Vargas, A., Peña-Vargas, A., Henao, A. M., & Ávila-Campos, J. E. (2020). Development and initial validation of the Generalized Tracking Questionnaire. PLoS ONE, 15(6), e0234393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234393.
Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., Barbero-Rubio, A., & Flórez, C. L. (2019). Development and initial validation of the generalized pliance questionnaire. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.03.003.
Ruíz-Martínez, Y., Hernández-Buitrago, P., & Quiroga Baquero, L. A. (2019). Effects of differential training in rule-governed behavior on compliance with traffic rules by pedestrians. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 53(3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v53i3.883.
Salazar, D. M., Ruiz, F. J., Flórez, C. L., & Suárez-Falcón, J. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the generalized pliance questionnaire-children. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 18(3), 273–287.
Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Authors Cooperative.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1957) Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B. Keinmuntz (Ed.), Problem-solving: Research, method, and therapy (pp. 225–257). Wiley.
Stapleton, A., & McHugh, L. (2020a). Just ask! Importance of qualitative explorations of children’s rule-following. Children’s Research Digest, 6(2), 1–5.
Stapleton, A., & McHugh, L. (2020b). Adolescent correlates of the generalized pliance questionnaire—children. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.12.006.
Waldeck, D., Pancani, L., & Tyndall, I. (2019). An examination of the construct validity of the generalized pliance questionnaire. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 11, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003.
Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1982). Rule-governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavior therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 73–118). Academic.
Availability of data an material
Not applicable
Code availability
Not applicable
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D. The Status of Rule-Governed Behavior as Pliance, Tracking and Augmenting within Relational Frame Theory: Middle-Level Rather than Technical Terms. Psychol Rec 72, 145–158 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-021-00458-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-021-00458-x