Abstract
Effective nutrition training is fundamental to medical education. Current training is inadequate and can cause harm to students and patients alike; it leaves physicians unprepared to counsel on nutrition, places undue focus on weight and body mass index (BMI), can exacerbate anti-obesity bias, and increase risk for development of eating disorders, while neglecting social determinants of health and communication skills. Physicians and educators hold positions of influence in society; what we say and how we say it matters. We propose actionable approaches to improve nutrition education to minimize harm and pursue evidence-based, effective, and equitable healthcare.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nutrition is fundamental to health and disease prevention [1]; a strong foundation in nutritional knowledge is therefore essential to medical education [2]. The estimated health burden of nutrition-associated conditions is significant and continues to increase [3]; current approaches to address this situation are not working [4]. We need to do better.
Nutrition education for medical students is often minimal [5,6,7], contains inaccuracies, and can harm both students and their future patients. It reinforces misconceptions and patterns of behavior detrimental to the health of students and patients alike. It can lead doctors to give bad advice, exacerbate weight stigma, and influence the development of eating disorders, while the omission of social and cultural determinants of diet leads to impractical recommendations that can alienate patients. Provider biases against obesity and inaccurate nutrition information disproportionately affect already-disadvantaged populations; rectifying our nutrition education is essential to create just, equitable, and successful healthcare.
Care should be taken in how nutrition is taught as medical schools seek to improve their nutrition curricula. We propose an evidence-based approach to nutrition education designed to support improved patient outcomes. We identify problematic practices in nutrition education from the perspective of both learners and patients, including limited evidence-based approaches to nutrition education, improper emphasis on body mass index (BMI), reinforcement of weight stigma, omission of eating disorders, lack of recognition of social determinants of health, and inadequate communication skills coaching. Nutrition and lifestyle medicine curricula have made significant progress in these areas in recent years, yet additional work remains [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. We make recommendations (Table 1) and propose specific, actionable alternatives to address failings in nutrition curricula (Tables 2 and 3).
Medical Nutrition Education Leaves Doctors Unprepared
There is widespread agreement that nutrition is an essential component of medical education and that the curricular time devoted to it is insufficient [6, 26,27,28,29,30]. Although “Biochemistry and Nutrition” comprise 14–25% of the questions on the USMLE Step 1 examination [31], the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) does not mandate the inclusion of nutrition in medical curricula [32]. In 1985, the National Academy of Sciences recommended that preclinical medical curricula include at least 25–30 h of nutrition instruction [33], yet by 2012–2013 medical schools averaged 14.3 h of nutrition education, a number that has been declining [5, 34].
More importantly, medical students do not feel prepared to offer nutrition advice to patients [6] and do not perceive that nutrition is a curricular priority, but believe nutrition counseling is an important physician role [35]. Physicians who receive more nutrition training provide counseling to more of their patients [36]. However, the majority of physicians report receiving insufficient training to address their patients’ nutritional needs [36,37,38,39,40,41], despite 72–95% feeling that it is a physician’s responsibility to discuss nutrition with patients [36, 37, 40, 42].
Biochemical Basis of Nutrition
A lack of nutrition knowledge can harm health. To provide nutrition advice specific to a patient’s health needs, physicians must understand the physiological roles of macro- and micronutrients and the biochemistry underlying their metabolism [43, 44]. Unfortunately, medical nutrition education frequently fails to contextualize this information or provide opportunities to practice its clinical application. Management of some disease states rely heavily on nutrition and metabolism [45,46,47,48,49,50]; some patients control their epilepsy through a “keto diet” [51]. However, the biochemical basis of this diet is frequently misunderstood—it is the exclusion of carbohydrates, not inclusion of fat, that leads to ketogenesis—leading to confusion in research and recommendations.
Foods and food groups are not inherently “good” or “bad,” and we should avoid moralization (e.g., “good carbs,” “bad fats”) and oversimplifying their relationship to health (e.g., “heart-healthy fats”) (Table 2). Consumption of essential fatty acids is vital, yet dietary guidelines fail to acknowledge this [52]. They recommend consumption of whole grains [52, 53], which are an important source of micronutrients and fiber for most people. However, because people commonly conflate “dietary carbs” (carbohydrate-rich foods, e.g. grains) with “biochemical carbohydrates” (e.g., sucrose, amylose), these guidelines often lead to the misconception that dietary carbohydrates are necessary for life or health. Well-intentioned doctors can thus malign patients’ dietary choices, believing, for example, that it is dangerous for a child with type 1 diabetes to use a low-carb diet (A. Martin, personal communication), despite evidence that it can improve glycemic control [54, 55]. Gluten-free diets are becoming increasingly common, and can lead to micronutrient deficiencies, as gluten-free alternatives typically lack the fortification of wheat products [56]. Discussing foods’ biological effects fosters a neutral approach that is open to each individual’s nutritional needs. Instead of conveying this nuanced reality, nutrition education too often reinforces overly simplistic messages and rigid, “one-size-fits-all” nutritional rules. For most people, there are many “right” ways to eat for good health.
Recommendation
Nutrition education should include the macro- and micronutrients found in various foods; their digestion, absorption, and metabolism/storage; and their roles in health and disease (Tables 1 and 2) [27, 43, 44, 57, 58].
Refocusing Nutrition Education from BMI and Weight to Health
BMI is widely used in healthcare and taught in medical education as an indicator of an individual’s health [59]. Yet the relationship between BMI and health status is not simple, as recognized by major organizations [48, 60, 61]. BMI is not an accurate indicator of body composition (fast, bone, and muscle mass) [60]. Using BMI as the main indicator of cardiometabolic health misclassifies a large percentage of American adults: almost 50% of overweight individuals, 29% of people with class 1 obesity, and 16% of those with class 2 or 3 obesity are metabolically healthy using the parameters of blood pressure, triglycerides, cholesterol, glucose, insulin resistance, and C-reactive protein [62]. Meanwhile, 30% of people whose BMI is in the “healthy” range are cardiometabolically unhealthy when assessed by these same parameters [62]. While BMIs in the obese range are correlated with negative health outcomes (e.g., cardiovascular disease, diabetes), cardiometabolic health is much more strongly predictive of overall health than BMI (Table 3) [63, 64].
Furthermore, it is not clear that weight, in and of itself, is a readily modifiable risk factor (Table 3). Most people struggle to maintain weight loss over the long term, and many cycle up and down in weight [65, 66], which has been found to be more harmful than consistently maintaining a higher weight [59, 67, 68]. Additionally, weight is not a behavior, and thus is not subject to behavioral modification counseling [69]. Actionable items such as active minutes per week, number of sugary drinks consumed, and mobility, or objective measures such as blood pressure, pulmonary function tests, or hemoglobin A1c, can be monitored and improvements achieved independent of weight change [4]. Many of the health benefits of lifestyle modifications, such as improved blood pressure, blood glucose, and lipid profile, are commonly ascribed to weight loss, yet they often occur independent of weight loss [59, 64].
Emphasizing healthy behaviors instead of weight encourages positive health outcomes for all patients [4, 64, 70]. This also reduces blame and shame; patients may feel at fault if weight loss is not seen, which can lead to learned helplessness and cessation of behavior change despite health improvements (Table 3) [4, 70]. Recommendations support the use of a SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound) goal framework to encourage patients to establish and maintain new behaviors regardless of weight changes [71].
Medical education, practice, and research have been closely entangled with cultural concepts of healthy body size [48, 72]. Even reputable sources downplay the risks of being underweight (Table 3) [73]. While the extreme ends of the BMI scale are correlated with negative health outcomes, nuances that students and physicians struggle to integrate into clinical decision-making include that this is less true of overweight and class I obesity [69, 74,75,76,77], that the association between higher BMIs and morbidity/mortality is significantly attenuated by health behaviors [78,79,80], and that correlation does not demonstrate causation [69, 77]. Some of this misapprehension reflects students carrying forward their prior beliefs, and some is taught. Case-based learning often includes the patient’s BMI, but not pertinent factors such as body composition, fat distribution, or mobility; this teaches students to rely on BMI to the exclusion of those factors. Many students focus on this measurement as an indicator of health, rather than considering objective measures of cardiometabolic health or information about the patient’s diet, exercise habits, health history, and medication list. In our experience, nutrition education provided to medical students typically emphasizes weight loss, ignoring the harms of weight cycling [81, 82] and the many studies demonstrating that a low BMI is associated with a higher mortality rate than a high BMI [76, 83].
Recommendation
Because the relationship between BMI and health is complex, nutrition education should stress the problematic nature of BMI as a marker of individual health and convey that health transcends specific BMI or weight targets (Tables 1 and 3) [48, 65, 69, 77].
Weight Stigma
Weight stigma permeates healthcare and harms patients; it is found in systemic and institutional approaches to patients as well as interpersonal interactions [84, 85]. Physicians demonstrate similar levels of weight bias [86] and registered dieticians higher levels [87] compared to the general population. This stigma commonly associates obesity with moral failures, laziness, and gluttony, overlooking the many biologic and systemic factors that intersect with weight [4, 65, 84]. Weight stigma is harmful to medical students [88], and can be reinforced by medical education [89]. Provider and internalized anti-obesity bias negatively impact patient care and patient health outcomes in several ways, thus contributing to the development of the very diseases weight loss recommendations are intended to prevent [4, 90].
Weight bias leads physicians to provide less empathic support and a lower standard of care to patients of higher weights [4, 65, 84]. Doctors are more likely to view overweight patients as non-compliant and attribute symptoms to a patient’s weight [65, 84, 91]. Rather than conduct the same testing and make the same diagnoses they would for normal-weight patients [4, 84], physicians advise weight loss, which harms health by encouraging weight cycling and contributing to internalized weight bias by implying patients are lazy and weak-willed [59, 69]. Higher-weight patients are less likely to be screened for problematic feeding behaviors or eating disorders, which carry significant health risks [92].
Experiencing weight stigma negatively impacts patients’ health behaviors [93, 94]. Anti-obesity bias experienced within the physician–patient relationship leads patients to delay seeking healthcare [4, 65, 84, 91]. Perpetuating weight stigma does not motivate patients to make “positive” changes; it pushes them into unhealthy coping mechanisms with significant long-term health risks, including increased consumption of alcohol, high-fat, high-sugar, and high-calorie foods, and decreased sleep quality and physical activity [65, 66, 93].
Weight stigma has adverse physiological effects; it causes chronic stress [90], as indicated by higher levels of C-reactive protein, cortisol, and oxidative stress, which contribute to negative health outcomes such as high blood pressure and diabetes [90, 93]. It has a myriad of negative effects on mental health [90, 95]. It is also predictive of weight gain, risk of obese BMI, and mortality—independent of baseline BMI [4, 90].
Recommendation
Medical education should seek to end weight stigma in healthcare [48, 50, 65, 69, 77, 96,97,98]. Medical education and communication with patients should be centered on behaviors and objective measures that are clearly linked to health outcomes, as this models a healthy approach to nutrition, weight, and physical activity (Table 1).
Eating Disorders
The explicit and implicit curricular focus on weight as a primary marker of health creates a specific lens for our learners that (1) trains them to under-recognize and inadvertently facilitate eating disorders among their future patients and (2) risks development or perpetuation of eating disorders among our trainees.
Eating disorders have one of the highest mortality rates of all mental illnesses, and they are associated with significant cost, morbidity, and greatly reduced quality of life [99, 100]. Eating disorders are seen at higher rates than type 2 diabetes in 15–24 year olds [101], but are rarely addressed or considered in medical nutrition education [102]. It is estimated that 14–20% of Americans will have had an eating disorder by age 40 [103]. This may not include the many individuals with subclinical symptoms that nonetheless negatively impact health, or those who go undiagnosed due to lack of access, stigma, or “normal” or high BMIs.
Medical education can shape recognition of and attitudes towards individuals with disordered eating. Physicians should not assume the presence, absence, or severity of an eating disorder based on an individual’s body type or weight (Table 3) [92, 104]. Overweight individuals are often told to lose weight without assessment for eating disorder risk, making it more likely that at-risk health behaviors (e.g., restriction, purging, over-exercise) will go unrecognized. This impairs their ability to access and receive appropriate treatment [98]. Learners should be taught that patients of all weights may suffer the negative physical and mental health outcomes of eating disorder behaviors and cognitions [105]. Nutrition counseling must always be done with an awareness and consideration of eating disorders, regardless of BMI. Trainees need to learn how to provide nutrition counseling that does not encourage risky eating behaviors or impair eating disorder treatment [92, 98].
When nutrition education contains anti-obesity messaging, it can cause harm by contributing to the onset or perpetuation of eating disorder behavior among patients and students [98, 106,107,108]. In one treatment center, 18% of patients affirmed that anti-obesity messaging contributed to the onset of their disorder, and these patients presented with more severe symptoms [107]. Educational curricula were the most common source of such messaging, and healthcare providers were a common source of weight stigma [107].
Medical nutritional curricula can impact the health of our trainees [106]. Globally, ~ 10% of medical students are at high risk for developing an eating disorder [109]. Recent studies of medical students in Lebanon, Pakistan, and China found eating disorder risk rates from 2 to 18% [110,111,112]. Nearly 1 in 6 American medical students (16%) is thought to be at high risk, although this estimate is based on data from the 1980s and 1990s [109]. While data on current prevalence are needed, a significant percentage of our trainees either have, or are at risk for, eating disorders.
Increasing an individual’s nutritional knowledge can lead to dietary improvements, such as increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and fiber [7, 25, 113, 114], but elevated awareness can also be problematic. Nutrition education can foster weight dissatisfaction and encourage behaviors that can increase risk for disordered eating [106]. Further research is needed to examine how nutrition education impacts the feeding behaviors of medical students and their patients.
Recommendation
Medical education should acknowledge eating disorders and the impact physician language and behavior can have on their development [92, 98, 105, 115], thereby protecting both patients and students (Tables 1 and 3).
Social and Structural Determinants of Health
While adequate nutrition is essential for life, we must remember that food is also culturally and socially important. People connect with each other over meals and eat special foods in celebration or mourning. We encourage educators and physicians to recognize that eating cake at a wedding or dates to break the fast of Ramadan count for quality of life.
Effective nutrition education—to students and patients alike—must recognize the importance of both culture and social and structural determinants of health (SSDOH) [27, 29, 48, 116, 117]. Unfortunately, medical education frequently assumes that everyone has equal access to food and the knowledge and ability to prepare healthy meals, and overlooks common barriers to healthy eating such as food deserts, cost, availability of fresh vs. ultra-processed foods, and lack of cooking appliances (Table 2). We should not shame food that is not fresh, or dismiss canned foods due to their sodium content. Instead, we should make suggestions for how to modify such foods, as they may be all that is available to some families. Similarly, claims that organic produce is necessary for health fail to acknowledge that these foods come at an inaccessible price tag for many [29] and that the organic designation is not relevant to the nutrition content of the product (Table 2) [118, 119].
Recommendation
Effective nutritional counseling starts with cultural humility and understanding a patient’s circumstances and needs to then offer effective suggestions that use or adapt what is available [27, 29, 43, 48, 117, 120]. Meeting a patient where they are can avoid creating distrust or a sense of futility and instead support people in making positive lifestyle changes. We recommend moving away from valuing food only for its nutrient content, and instead acknowledge the complex role that food plays in any individual’s life and culture (Tables 1 and 2) [30, 52, 121].
How We Say It: Language and Effective Communication
The words [70, 122] and communication strategies [123] physicians use impact patient outcomes. Students and physicians must be taught that evidence does not support using shame to coerce individuals into behavior change; rather, it furthers discrimination, is counterproductive, and can cause harm (Table 3) [48, 65, 101]. Research clearly and consistently indicates that physicians should foster behavior change through motivational interviewing, where patients’ autonomy, values, and goals are primary [124]. The tenets of motivational interviewing—compassion, acceptance, evocation, and collaboration—shield against the shame and moralizing so often present in discussions of weight and nutrition. Medical students report wanting help learning how to talk to patients about weight; we suggest instead that students need to learn to talk constructively with patients about their goals, behaviors, and health.
Recommendation
Nutrition curricula should include motivational interviewing and communication skills training to best serve future patients in these complex conversations (Tables 1 and 3) [2, 27, 43, 48, 116, 120, 124].
Conclusion
Medical education is not adequately equipping students to care for their future patients’ nutritional needs. When education perpetuates weight stigma and encourages disordered eating habits, it hurts our students, their future patients, and the healthcare system as whole.
Effective medical education can instead help end this cycle and improve health for all. As medical educators work to improve nutrition education, we should be mindful of the challenges patients face, from the systemic to the interpersonal, and what students absorb from our explicit curriculum and faculty modeling. Nutrition education should be grounded in basic science, informed by robust and current evidence about the role of nutrition in health and disease, cognizant of social determinants of health, and emphasize communication skills to foster sustained, healthy behavior changes. There are many institutions and passionate educators committed to change, and over the last decade many nutrition and lifestyle medicine curricula have addressed these issues; there is still significant progress to be made in multiple areas. Making these changes in medical education can be challenging; nutrition touches every aspect of integrated medical curricula, may benefit from interprofessional education [125], and requires collaboration among faculty. This could be facilitated by future research to build expert consensus in the field. Medical educators want to help students develop into empathic, effective physicians; we hope our recommendations can help equip students with the knowledge and skills to discuss nutrition, weight, and health.
References
Murray CJL, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, et al. The state of US health, 1990–2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013;310(6):591–608. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.13805.
Lepre B, Trigueiro H, Johnsen JT, Khalid AA, Ball L, Ray S. Global architecture for the nutrition training of health professionals: a scoping review and blueprint for next steps. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2022;5(1):106–17. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000354.
GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1958–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8.
Tomiyama AJ, Carr D, Granberg EM, et al. How and why weight stigma drives the obesity ‘epidemic’ and harms health. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):123–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1116-5.
Adams KM, Butsch WS, Kohlmeier M. The State of Nutrition Education at US Medical Schools. J Biomed Educ. 2015;2015:357627. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/357627.
Crowley J, Ball L, Hiddink GJ. Nutrition in medical education: a systematic review. Lancet Planet Health. 2019;3(9):e379–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30171-8.
Bassin SR, Al-Nimr RI, Allen K, Ogrinc G. The state of nutrition in medical education in the United States. Nutr Rev. 2020;78(9):764–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuz100.
Adams KM, Kohlmeier M, Powell M, Zeisel SH. Nutrition in medicine: nutrition education for medical students and residents. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25(5):471–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533610379606.
Schoettler CL, Lee JN, Ireland KA, Lenders CM. A novel method of increasing medical student nutrition awareness and education. J Biomed Ed. 2015;2015:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/784042.
Brogan Hartlieb K, Engle B, Obeso V, Pedoussaut MA, Merlo LJ, Brown DR. Advanced patient-centered communication for health behavior change: motivational interviewing workshops for medical learners. MedEdPORTAL. 2016;12:10455. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10455.
Dang TM, Maggio LA. Supporting the call to action: a review of nutrition educational interventions in the health professions literature and MedEdPORTAL. Acad Med. 2017;92(3):403–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001532.
Caines L, Asiedu Y, Dugdale T, Wu H. An interprofessional approach to teaching nutrition counseling to medical students. MedEdPORTAL. 2018;14:10742. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10742.
Van Horn L, Lenders CM, Pratt CA, et al. Advancing nutrition education, training, and research for medical students, residents, fellows, attending physicians, and other clinicians: building competencies and interdisciplinary coordination. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(6):1181–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmz083.
Pasarica M, Kay D, Cameron R. Using active pedagogies to advance learning for lifestyle medicine: an approach for medical students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2019;43(2):191–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00195.2018.
Lifestyle Medicine Education. Lifestyle medicine and obesity, BMI and body composition. 2021. https://lifestylemedicineeducation.org/2021/08/29/bmi-and-body-composition/. Accessed 8 Feb 2024.
D’Adamo CR, Workman K, Barnabic C, et al. Culinary medicine training in core medical school curriculum improved medical student nutrition knowledge and confidence in providing nutrition counseling. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;16(6):740–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276211021749.
Jacobs NN, Calvo L, Dieringer A, Hall A, Danko R. Motivational interviewing training: a case-based curriculum for preclinical medical students. MedEdPORTAL. 2021;17:11104–8265.11104. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11104.
Rea B, Worthman S, Shetty P, Alexander M, Trilk JL. Medical education transformation: lifestyle medicine in undergraduate and graduate medical education, fellowship, and continuing medical education. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;15(5):514–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276211006629.
Pasarica M, Boring M, Lessans S. Current practices in the instruction of lifestyle medicine in medical curricula. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(2):339–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.042.
Patel P, Kassam S. Evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: a rapid review. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022;35(5):861–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12972.
Jones G, Macaninch E, Mellor D, et al. Putting nutrition education on the table: development of a curriculum to meet future doctors’ needs. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2022;5(2):208–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000510.
American College of Lifestyle Medicine. Food as medicine: calorie density – a simple yet powerful approach to weight loss. 2023. https://lifestylemedicine.org/project/calorie-density/. Accessed Jan 2024.
Dumm M, Moll K, Helbach A, et al. Implementing nutritional medicine into medical curricula: a student-initiated course improves knowledge and attitudes. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023;57:181–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.06.043.
Newman C, Yan J, Messiah SE, Albin J. Culinary medicine as innovative nutrition education for medical students: a scoping review. Acad Med. 2023;98(2):274–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004895.
Mogre V, Amoore BY, Gaa PK. A scoping review of nutrition education interventions to improve competencies, lifestyle and dietary habits of medical students and residents. J Nutr Sci. 2023;12:e31. https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2023.16.
Daley BJ, Cherry-Bukowiec J, Van Way CW III, et al. Current status of nutrition training in graduate medical education from a survey of residency program directors: a formal nutrition education course is necessary. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(1):95–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607115571155.
Aspry KE, Van Horn L, Carson JAS, et al. Medical nutrition education, training, and competencies to advance guideline-based diet counseling by physicians: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(23):e821–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000563.
Lepre B, Mansfield KJ, Ray S, Beck E. Reference to nutrition in medical accreditation and curriculum guidance: a comparative analysis. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2021;4(1):307–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000234.
White House. Biden-Harris Administration National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health. 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/White-House-National-Strategy-on-Hunger-Nutrition-and-Health-FINAL.pdf. Accessed Jan 2024.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Proceedings of the Summit on Medical Education in Nutrition Documenting Three Days of Discussion. Updated 2023. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pdfs/nutritionsummit/nutrition-summit-proceedings.pdf. Accessed Feb 2024.
United States Medical Licensing Examination. Table 3: Step 1 Discipline Specifications. In: Step 1 Content Outline and Specifications. https://www.usmle.org/prepare-your-exam/step-1-materials/step-1-content-outline-and-specifications. Accessed 7 Jun 2023.
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the MD Degree. 2024. https://lcme.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2025-26-Functions-and-Structure_2024-02-28.docx. Accessed 19 Mar 2024.
National Research Council (US) Committee on Nutrition in Medical Education. Nutrition Education in U.S. Medical Schools. National Academies Press (US); 1985; https://doi.org/10.17226/597.
Adams KM, Kohlmeier M, Zeisel SH. Nutrition education in U.S. medical schools: latest update of a national survey. Acad Med. 2010;85(9):1537–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eab71b.
Mogre V, Stevens FCJ, Aryee PA, Amalba A, Scherpbier AJJA. Why nutrition education is inadequate in the medical curriculum: a qualitative study of students’ perspectives on barriers and strategies. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):26–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1130-5.
Kushner RF. Barriers to providing nutrition counseling by physicians: a survey of primary care practitioners. Prev Med. 1995;24(6):546–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1995.1087.
Vetter ML, Herring SJ, Sood M, Shah NR, Kalet AL. What do resident physicians know about nutrition? An evaluation of attitudes, self-perceived proficiency and knowledge. J Am Coll Nutr. 2008;27(2):287–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2008.10719702.
Kolasa KM, Rickett K. Barriers to providing nutrition counseling cited by physicians: a survey of primary care practitioners. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25(5):502–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533610380057.
Frantz DJ, McClave SA, Hurt RT, Miller K, Martindale RG. Cross-sectional study of U.S. interns’ perceptions of clinical nutrition education. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(4):529–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607115571016.
Devries S, Agatston A, Aggarwal M, et al. A deficiency of nutrition education and practice in cardiology. Am J Med. 2017;130(11):1298–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.04.043.
Sutherland M, McKenney K, Shanahan H, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. The need for nutritional education reform in US medical education system. Am Surg. 2021;87(7):1032–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820971621.
Khandelwal S, Zemore SE, Hemmerling A. Nutrition education in internal medicine residency programs and predictors of residents’ dietary counseling practices. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2018;5:2382120518763360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120518763360.
Lindsley JE, Abali EE, Bikman BT, et al. What nutrition-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes should medical students develop? Med Sci Educ. 2017;27:579–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0476-3.
Cuerda C, Muscaritoli M, Krznaric Z, et al. Nutrition education in medical schools (NEMS) project: joining ESPEN and university point of view. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2754–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.010.
Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082–143. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625.
Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Executive Summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(10):1376–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.009.
Garber AJ, Handelsman Y, Grunbr G, et al. Consensus Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm - 2020 Executive Summary. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(1):107–39. https://doi.org/10.4158/CS-2019-0472.
Wharton S, Lau DCW, Vallis M, et al. Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2020;192(31):E875–91. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.191707.
Newberry C, Laster J, Pickett-Blakely O, eds. Nutrition, Weight, and Digestive Health: The Clinician's Desk Reference. Springer Nature; 2022.
Teede H, Tay CT, Laven JSE, et al. International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 2023. 2023. https://doi.org/10.26180/24003834.v1.
Neal EG, Chaffe H, Schwartz RH, et al. The ketogenic diet for the treatment of childhood epilepsy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(6):500–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70092-9.
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. 9th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Publishing Office; 2020. DietaryGuidelines.gov. Accessed 7 Jun 2023.
Health Canada. Canada's Dietary Guidelines for Health Professionals and Policy Makers. 2019. https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/guidelines/. Accessed 7 Jun 2023.
Feinman RD, Pogozelski WK, Astrup A, et al. Dietary carbohydrate restriction as the first approach in diabetes management: critical review and evidence base. Nutrition. 2015;31(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2014.06.011.
Lennerz BS, Barton A, Bernstein RK, et al. Management of type 1 diabetes with a very low-carbohydrate diet. Pediatrics. 2018;141(6):e20173349. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3349.
Andrewski E, Cheng K, Vanderpool C. Nutritional deficiencies in vegetarian, gluten-free, and ketogenic diets. Pediatr Rev. 2022;43(2):61–70. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2020-004275.
Cardenas D, Diaz G, Fuchs-Tarlovsky V, et al. Nutrition competencies for undergraduate medical education: results of an international interdisciplinary consensus. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022;46(3):635–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2203.
Association for Nutrition (AfN). AfN UK Undergraduate Curriculum in Nutrition for Medical Doctors. 2021. https://www.associationfornutrition.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2021-UK-Undergraduate-Curriculum-in-Nutrition-for-Medical-Doctors-FINAL.pdf. Accessed Feb 2024.
Hagan S, Nelson K. Are current guidelines perpetuating weight stigma? A weight-skeptical approach to the care of patients with obesity. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38(3):793–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07821-w.
WHO Expert Committee on Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Physical status: The use of and interpretation of anthropometry, report of a WHO expert committee. World Health Organization. 1995. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/37003.
Council on Science and Public Health. CSAPH Report 07-A-23, Support Removal of BMI as a Standard Measure in Medicine and Recognizing Culturally-Diverse and Varied Presentations of Eating Disorders and Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. American Medical Association. 2023. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/a23-csaph07.pdf.
Tomiyama AJ, Hunger JM, Nguyen-Cuu J, Wells C. Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES 2005–2012. Int J Obes. 2016;40(5):883–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.17.
Guo F, Garvey WT. Cardiometabolic disease risk in metabolically healthy and unhealthy obesity: stability of metabolic health status in adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(2):516–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21344.
Gaesser GA, Angadi SS. Obesity treatment: weight loss versus increasing fitness and physical activity for reducing health risks. iScience. 2021;24(10):102995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102995.
Rubino F, Puhl RM, Cummings DE, et al. Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity. Nat Med. 2020;26(4):485–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0803-x.
Lee KM, Hunger JM, Tomiyama AJ. Weight stigma and health behaviors: evidence from the Eating in America Study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021;45(7):1499–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00814-5.
Bangalore S, Fayyad R, Laskey R, DeMicco DA, Messerli FH, Waters DD. Body-weight fluctuations and outcomes in coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(14):1332–40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606148.
Rhee E. Weight cycling and its cardiometabolic impact. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2017;26(4):237–42. https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes.2017.26.4.237.
Mauldin K, May M, Clifford D. The consequences of a weight-centric approach to healthcare: a case for a paradigm shift in how clinicians address body weight. Nutr Clin Pract. 2022;37(6):1291–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10885.
Albury C, Strain WD, Brocq SL, et al. The importance of language in engagement between health-care professionals and people living with obesity: a joint consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(5):447–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30102-9.
Bailey RR. Goal setting and action planning for health behavior change. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2017;13(6):615–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827617729634.
Elmaleh-Sachs A, Schwartz JL, Bramante CT, Nicklas JM, Gudzune KA, Jay M. Obesity management in adults: a review. JAMA. 2023;330(20):2000–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.19897.
American Heart Association. Life's Simple 7. https://playbook.heart.org/lifes-simple-7/. Accessed 11 Jun 2023.
Campos P, Saguy A, Ernsberger P, Oliver E, Gaesser G. The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: public health crisis or moral panic? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(1):55–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi254.
Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309(1):71–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.113905.
Bhaskaran K, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Leon DA, Douglas IJ, Smeeth L. Association of BMI with overall and cause-specific mortality: a population-based cohort study of 3·6 million adults in the UK. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(12):944–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30288-2.
Hunger JM, Smith JP, Tomiyama AJ. An evidence-based rationale for adopting weight-inclusive health policy. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2020;14(1):73–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12062.
Matheson EM, King DE, Everett CJ. Healthy lifestyle habits and mortality in overweight and obese individuals. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(1):9–15. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110164.
Loef M, Walach H. The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2012;55(3):163–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.06.017.
Barry VW, Baruth M, Beets MW, Durstine JL, Liu J, Blair SN. Fitness vs. fatness on all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56(4):382–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2013.09.002.
Huang S, Shi K, Ren Y, et al. Association of magnitude of weight loss and weight variability with mortality and major cardiovascular events among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):78–x. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01503-x.
Massey RJ, Siddiqui MK, Pearson ER, Dawed AY. Weight variability and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22(1):5–x. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01735-x.
Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH. Cause-specific excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA. 2007;298(17):2028–37. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.17.2028.
Phelan SM, Burgess DJ, Yeazel MW, Hellerstedt WL, Griffin JM, van Ryn M. Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity. Obes Rev. 2015;16(4):319–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12266.
Phelan SM, Bauer KW, Bradley D, et al. A model of weight-based stigma in health care and utilization outcomes: evidence from the Learning Health Systems Network. Obes Sci Pract. 2021;8(2):139–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.553.
Sabin JA, Marini M, Nosek BA. Implicit and explicit anti-fat bias among a large sample of medical doctors by BMI, race/ethnicity and gender. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e48448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048448.
Edelstein S, Silva N, Mancini L. Obesity bias among dietitians by using the fat people-thin people implicit association test. Top Clin Nutr. 2009;24(1):67–72.
Phelan SM, Burgess DJ, Puhl R, et al. The adverse effect of weight stigma on the well-being of medical students with overweight or obesity: findings from a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(9):1251–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3266-x.
Goss AL, Rethy L, Pearl RL, DeLisser HM. The “difficult” cadaver: weight bias in the gross anatomy lab. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1742966. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1742966.
Wu Y, Berry DC. Impact of weight stigma on physiological and psychological health outcomes for overweight and obese adults: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(5):1030–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13511.
Alberga AS, Edache IY, Forhan M, Russell-Mayhew S. Weight bias and health care utilization: a scoping review. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019;20:e116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000227.
Ralph AF, Brennan L, Byrne S, et al. Management of eating disorders for people with higher weight: clinical practice guideline. J Eat Disord. 2022;10(1):121–w. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00622-w.
Puhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Pearl RL. Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity. Am Psychol. 2020;75(2):274–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000538.
Lessard LM, Puhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Pearl RL, Foster GD. Eating and exercise-related correlates of weight stigma: a multinational investigation. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2021;29(6):966–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23168.
Pearl RL, Puhl RM. Weight bias internalization and health: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2018;19(8):1141–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12701.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Weight bias and obesity stigma: considerations for the WHO European Region. 2017. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/353613.
Flint SW. Time to end weight stigma in healthcare. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;34:100810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100810.
McEntee ML, Philip SR, Phelan SM. Dismantling weight stigma in eating disorder treatment: next steps for the field. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1157594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1157594.
Arcelus J, Mitchell AJ, Wales J, Nielsen S. Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders: a meta-analysis of 36 studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(7):724–31. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74.
Deloitte Access Economics. The Social and Economic Cost of Eating Disorders in the United States of America: A Report for the Strategic Training Initiative for the Prevention of Eating Disorders and the Academy for Eating Disorders. 2020. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/striped/report-economic-costs-of-eating-disorders/.
Kasten G. Listen… and speak: a discussion of weight bias, its intersections with homophobia, racism, and misogyny, and their impacts on health. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2018;79(3):133–8. https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2018-023.
Anderson K, Accurso EC, Kinasz KR, Le Grange D. Residents’ and fellows’ knowledge and attitudes about eating disorders at an Academic Medical Center. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41(3):381–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0578-z.
Ward ZJ, Rodriguez P, Wright DR, Austin SB, Long MW. Estimation of eating disorders prevalence by age and associations with mortality in a simulated nationally representative US cohort. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(10):e1912925. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12925.
Hornberger LL, Lane MA. Identification and management of eating disorders in children and adolescents. Pediatrics (Evanston). 2021;147(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-040279.
Ramaswamy N, Ramaswamy N. Overreliance on BMI and delayed care for patients with higher BMI and disordered eating. AMA J Ethics. 2023;25(7):540. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2023.540.
Budhiwianto S, Bennett CJ, Bristow CA, Dart J. Global prevalence of eating disorders in nutrition and dietetic university students: a systematic scoping review. Nutrients. 2023;15(10):2317. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15102317.
Mensinger JL, Cox SA, Henretty JR. Treatment outcomes and trajectories of change in patients attributing their eating disorder onset to anti-obesity messaging. Psychosom Med. 2021;83(7):777–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000962.
Puhl R, Suh Y. Stigma and eating and weight disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015;17(3):552–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0552-6.
Jahrami H, Sater M, Abdulla A, Faris MA, AlAnsari A. Eating disorders risk among medical students: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Eat Weight Disord. 2019;24(3):397–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0516-z.
Bizri M, Geagea L, Kobeissy F, Talih F. Prevalence of eating disorders among medical students in a Lebanese medical school: a cross-sectional study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:1879–87. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S266241.
Memon AA, Adil SE, Siddiqui EU, Naeem SS, Ali SA, Mehmood K. Eating disorders in medical students of Karachi. Pakistan-a cross-sectional study BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:84–84. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-84.
Zeng W, Chen R, Wang X, Zhang Q, Deng W. Prevalence of mental health problems among medical students in China: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(18):e15337. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015337.
Worsley A. Nutrition knowledge and food consumption: can nutrition knowledge change food behaviour? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11(Suppl 3):579. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.supp3.7.x.
Crowley J, Ball L, Leveritt MD, Arroll B, Han DY, Wall C. Impact of an undergraduate course on medical students’ self-perceived nutrition intake and self-efficacy to improve their health behaviours and counselling practices. J Prim Health Care. 2014;6(2):101–7.
Council on Science and Public Health. Eating Disorders H-150.965. American Medical Association. 2023. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/H-150.965?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-0-639.xml.
Recommended Curriculum Guidelines for Family Medicine Residents: Nutrition. AAFP reprint no. 275. American Academy of Family Physicians. Updated 2020. https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/medical_education_residency/program_directors/Reprint275_Nutrition.pdf. Accessed Feb 2024.
Holton L, Hitchell KS, Surdyk PM, Combes JR. ACGME Summit on Medical Education in Nutrition Develops Guidance for Educators on Improving Education in Nutrition. J Grad Med Educ. 2023;15(6):759–61. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00801.1.
Smith-Spangler C, Brandeau ML, Hunter GE, et al. Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives?: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(5):348–66. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Labeling Organic Products. https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/organic/labeling. Accessed 14 Jun 2023.
Trilk JL, Worthman S, Shetty P, et al. Undergraduate medical education: lifestyle medicine curriculum implementation standards. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;15(5):526–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276211008142.
Xie JY, Abramovich N, Burridge J, Jaffee A, Broadley I. Nutrition education in core medical curricula: a call to action from tomorrow’s doctors. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(1):19–21. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0207.
Puhl RM. What words should we use to talk about weight? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies examining preferences for weight-related terminology. Obes Rev. 2020;21(6):e13008. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13008.
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Health Communication. In: Healthy People 2030. 2020. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/health-communication. Accessed 10 Feb 2024.
Searight HR. Counseling patients in primary care: evidence-based strategies. Am Fam Physician. 2018;98(12):719–28.
Hark LA, Deen D. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: interprofessional education in nutrition as an essential component of medical education. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(7):1104–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.04.019.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Andrew McKown, Brett Szymik, B. Teague, and C.K. Gunsalus for their insightful comments and editing, Aimee Martin for generously sharing her experience as a parent of a child with type 1 diabetes, and the many others who have supported us along the way.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jordan Mixon; all authors contributed to subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
This review project did not involve human participants, their data, or biological material.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gunsalus, K.T.W., Mixon, J.K. & House, E.M. Medical Nutrition Education for Health, Not Harm: BMI, Weight Stigma, Eating Disorders, and Social Determinants of Health. Med.Sci.Educ. 34, 679–690 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02025-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02025-9