Skip to main content
Log in

A Symposium-Based Self-Directed Learning Approach to Teaching Medical Cell Biology to Medical Students

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Commonwealth Medical College has used a variety of self-directed learning pedagogies to promote the student’s performance and knowledge retention since its inception in 2009. Based on this goal, a Cell Biology Symposium was designed to allow students to present medical cell biology concepts to their peers. It was believed that by utilizing a team-based learning strategy, this would enhance the students’ learning. This is a study that describes how well medical students mastered medical cell biology concepts in a classroom lecture-based format versus a peer-teaching format arranged as a Medical Cell Biology Symposium. We analyzed the list of cell biology concepts that medical students were required to understand according to guidelines published by the 2009 US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 Content Description and General Information (2008) and chose eight appropriate subjects and associated diseases that would cover these concepts. The 65 students in the 2009 class were assigned to teams and given faculty selected papers. Their goal was a PowerPoint presentation to their fellow students, designed on updating the class on the changes in medical knowledge since their assigned paper was published, including associated learning objectives and an annotated bibliography. We analyzed a student-derived, take-home test and a multiple-choice test given to the subsequent class of 2010, also composed of 65 students. As expected, scores for the open-book take-home test were much higher than the scores in a closed-book, multiple-choice examination given in the subsequent year. Our data indicate that satisfaction with an activity does not necessarily correlate with knowledge of this subject area in test performance and that this type of self-directed learning activity is an excellent way to deliver cell biology content to medical students. The real value of the Cell Biology Symposium may lie more in improving student skills in communication, problem solving, leadership, and working together as a team. These skills will be at least as important to the future success of our medical students as their mastery of the basic science, in this case cell biology, associated with the practice of medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doane KJ, Boyd P. Authoring of patient education materials by medical students: an activity designed to demonstrate communication to the lay public. Med Sci Educator Forthcoming. 2015:1–16. doi:10.1007/s40670-015-0182-y.

  2. Holt JT, Szarek JL. Organ recitals: a large group active learning technique. In: Fornari A, Poznanski A, editors. IAMSE manuals: how to guide for active learning. Huntington: IAMSE; 2015. p. 100–7.

  3. Bene KL, Bergus G. When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education. Fam Med. 2014;46(10):783–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, Wenderoth MP. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2014;111(23):8410–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lambert, C. Twilight of the Lecture. Harvard Magazine. 2012;114(4):23–27.

  6. Lucas KH, Testman JA, Hoyland MN, Kimble AM, Euler ML. Correlation between active-learning coursework and student retention of core content during advanced pharmacy practice experiences. A J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(8) Article 171:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fink LD. Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). 2009 Step 1 Content Description and General Information. San Diego, CA: Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, Inc. and the National Board of Medical Examiners; 2008.

  9. Gauci SA, Dantas AM, Williams DA, Kemm RE. Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009;3(1):60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parmalee DX, Hudes P. Team-based learning: a relevant strategy in health professionals’ education. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):411–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vasan NS, DeFouw DO, Compton S. Team-based learning in anatomy: an efficient, effective and economical strategy. Anat Sci Educ. 2011;4(6):333–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrison A Using knowledge decrement to compare medical students’ long-term retention of self-study reading and lecture materials. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 1995;20(2):149–59.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, Esserman DA, Mumper RJ. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):236–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hmelo CE. Problem-based learning: effects on the early acquisition of cognitive skill in medicine. J Learning Sci. 1998;7(2):173–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eberlein T, Kampmeier J, Minderhout V, Moog RS, Platt T, Varma-Nelson P, White HB. Pedagogies of engagement in science: a comparison of PBS, POGIL and PLTL. Biochem Molec Biol Educ. 2008;36:262–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Minderhoutt V, Loertscher J. Lecture-free biochemistry: a process oriented guided inquiry approach. Biochem Molec Biol Educ. 2007;35:172–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wright R, Boggs J. (2002) Learning cell biology as a team: a project-based approach to upper-division cell biology. Cell Biol Educ. 2002;1:145–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barkley EF, Major CH, Cross KP. Collaborative learning techniques: a handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2014. 456 p.

  19. White C, Bradley E, Martindale J, Roy P, Patel K, Yoon M, Worden MK. Why are students checking out of active learning in a new curriculum? Med Educ. 2014;48(3):315–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kooloos JG. deWall Malefijit MC, Ruiter DJ, Vorstenbosch MA. Loosely-guided, self-directed learning versus strictly-guided, station-based learning in gross anatomy laboratory sessions. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(6):340–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen J. Doane.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Topics covered and associated papers
Table 2 Timeline for the Cell Biology Symposium in 2009
Table 3 Presentation rubric
Fig. 1
figure 1

Two examples of learning objectives provided by student groups, including both USMLE- and group-generated presentation learning objectives

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doane, K.J., Boyd, P. A Symposium-Based Self-Directed Learning Approach to Teaching Medical Cell Biology to Medical Students. Med.Sci.Educ. 26, 229–237 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0243-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0243-x

Keywords

Navigation