Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching Medical Students Left Internal Thoracic Artery Ultrasound

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Previous studies have described techniques for performing ultrasound of the left internal thoracic artery. The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of medical students with little prior ultrasound experience to quickly find and identify the left internal thoracic artery after a brief instructional session.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-one first-year medical students were taught to perform ultrasound of the left internal thoracic artery. The instruction consisted of a 5-min didactic followed by a 2-min real-time ultrasound demonstration. Each participant was then given a maximum of 2 min to find the artery while scanning a standardized patient. A radiologist made the determination of whether or not the student pointed out the correct structure within that time period. If the student was successful, then the time to locate the artery was recorded. The students also completed a questionnaire about the ultrasound experience.

Results

Forty (78 %) of the 51 students correctly identified the artery in less than 2 min. For those students, the mean time to locate the artery was 69.5 s. Four students pointed out the incorrect structure. Seven students ran out of time before pointing out a structure. Nearly all of the students indicated that they enjoyed the experience and that it increased their interest in ultrasound.

Conclusions

This study showed that novice ultrasound users can quickly learn to locate the left internal thoracic artery with ultrasound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically oriented anatomy. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 2014.

  2. Tsang TSM, Freeman WK, Sinak LJ, Seward JB. Echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis: evolution and state-of-the-art technique. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73:647–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsang TSM, Enriquez-Sarano M, Freeman WK, Barnes ME, Sinak LJ, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Seward JB. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:429–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindenberger M, Kjellberg M, Karlsson E, Wranne B. Pericardiocentesis guided by 2-D echocardiography: the method of choice for treatment of pericardial effusion. J Intern Med. 2003;253:411–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitch MT, Nicks BA, Pariyadath M, McGinnis HD, Manthey DE. Emergency pericardiocentesis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kronzon I, Glassman LR, Tunick PA. Avoiding the left internal mammary artery during anterior pericardiocentesis. Echocardiography. 2003;20:533–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanco P, Volpicelli G. Looking a bit superficial to the pleura. Critical Ultrasound J. 2014;6:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehra S, Buch A, Truong CN, Moshiri M, Shriki JE, Bhargava P. Post-traumatic internal mammary artery pseudoaneurysm: a rare complication of pericardiocentesis. Radiol Case Rep. 2014; (Online)9:931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrsam J-E, Spittell PC, Seward JB. Internal mammary artery: 100 % visualization with new ultrasound technology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11:10–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagdev A, Mantuani D. A novel in-plane technique for ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31:1424e5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang V, Cheng YT, Liu D. Improving education: just-in-time splinting video. The Clinical Teacher. 2015;12:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis JS, Garcia GD, Wycoff MM, Alsafran S, Graygo JM, Withum KF, Schulman CI. Use of mobile learning module improves skills in chest tube insertion. J Surg Res. 2012;177:21–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Niles D, Sutton RM, Donoghue A, Kalsi MS, Roberts K, Boyle L, Nishisaki A, Arbogast KB, Helfaer M, Nadkarni V. “Rolling Refreshers”: a novel approach to maintain CPR psychomotor skill competence. Resuscitation. 2009;80:909–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamdar G, Kessler DO, Tilt L, Srivastava G, Khanna K, Chang TP, Balmer D, Auerbach M. Qualitative evaluation of just-in-time simulation-based learning: the learners’ perspective. Simul Healthc. 2013;8(1):43–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:749–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006;30(1):13–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Matthew Aussprung MS-4, Michael Corso MS-1, and Tyler Stoltz MS-4 for volunteering to be standardized patients for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Floyd E. Bell III.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

General Electric Healthcare through an educational partnership with the University of South Carolina, School of Medicine provides ultrasound systems and technical support for a student ultrasound curriculum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bell III, F.E., Neuffer, F.H., Rao, V.V. et al. Teaching Medical Students Left Internal Thoracic Artery Ultrasound. Med.Sci.Educ. 26, 207–211 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0233-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0233-z

Keywords

Navigation