Human body is colonized by trillions of microbes, influenced by several factors, both endogenous, as hormones and circadian regulation, and exogenous as, life-style habits and nutrition. The alteration of such factors can lead to microbial dysbiosis, a phenomenon which, in turn, represents a risk factor in many different pathologies including cancer, diabetes, autoimmune and cardiovascular disease, and infertility. Female microbiota dysbiosis (vaginal, endometrial, placental) and male microbiota dysbiosis (seminal fluid) can influence the fertility, determining a detrimental impact on various conditions, as pre-term birth, neonatal illnesses, and macroscopic sperm parameters impairments. Furthermore, unprotected sexual intercourse creates a bacterial exchange between partners, and, in addition, each partner can influence the microbiota composition of partner’s reproductive tracts. This comprehensive overview of the effects of bacterial dysbiosis in both sexes and how partners might influence each other will allow for better personalization of infertility management.
Introduction: microbial communities harbored in intestinal and genital tracts
In recent years, the existence of a human associated microbial fauna was the topic of many and very detailed studies. Scientific projects like the U.S.A. National Institutes of Health (NIS) “Human Microbiome Project” (HMP), which started in 2007 and lasted for almost a decade, provided methods and resources to detect firstly, the existence of a microbial fauna in many human body niches, and secondly, to detect microbial effects on human health .
Most of the human microbiota (80%) resides in the intestinal tract and is considered as an additional human organ. As a matter of fact, the gut microbiota strongly affect human health, by hindering pathogen colonization , exerting metabolic and trophic actions, and contributing to the development of the immune system functions . As the host on which the gut microbiota is harbored is subjected to a circadian regulation, that is the influence of environmental signals deriving mainly from the day/night alternation, also the gut microbiota is subjected to its own specific circadian regulation. This regulation can influence both tropism and metabolites secretion, conditioning in turn also host homeostasis . In addition, recent evidence showed how gut microbiota also exert a role in reproductive system’s development , influencing both male and female sexual maturation. In particular, the synthesis of metabolites, as secondary bile acids, that are gut derivatives able to influence testicular physiology , and of nutritional metabolites, as indole that can induce oogenesis-associated genes in some animal taxa  and as soybean, that has estrogenic effect .
Intestinal epithelial barrier harbors a large microbial community characterized by four major phyla, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and an intestinal healthy microbiota composition able to maintaining intestinal homeostasis, that is characterized by > 90% of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and is correlated with a low Firmicutes/ Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio . An imbalanced F/B ratio, named dysbiosis, represents a risk factor linked to many pathological consequences onset, both intestinal and whole organism related, impairing intestinal homeostasis through a microbial diversity reduction (which increases F/B ratio), and the lowering of the synthesized metabolites .
Only the 9% of the human microbiota was detected as harbored in urogenital tracts , and many studies detected their microbial composition in female and male, although the definition of their microbiota healthy state is complicated, due to the problems connected to the bacterial contamination and the detection of a low microbial concentration. In addition, numerous evidence proved how a genital microbial dysbiosis can represent a risk factor in infertility onset. In healthy conditions, females host a dominance of Lactobacillus bacteria, which exert many protective functions connected to lactic acid production and to the keep of vaginal acid pH . Female microbiota composition was correlated to exert an influence on natural pregnancy  and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes , and the variation of its constitution might be useful marker of pregnancy outcomes . In male microbiota, Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas and Prevotella could exert influence on sperm quality parameters and specifically Pseudomonas was associated with sperm count in opposite way respect to Prevotella, which was instead inversely associated. Interestingly, Prevotella abundance was inversely associated with sperm concentration, and Pseudomonas was directly associated with total motile sperm count. Using a shotgun metagenomics a recent work demonstrated that the gut and urinary dysbiosis represent a risk factor for infertility, while the testicular one may have a role in mammalian spermatogenesis .
The aim of this review is to summarize the available findings on the most recent data about microbial colonization of the female and male genital tracts, and to highlight the features of the dysbiosis and its role on infertility.
Interactions between gut microbiota, circadian regulation, and sexual development
The circadian regulation is the biological mechanism by the organisms living on the planet adapt their physiology and their behaviors to the astronomical day-night alternation. This system is hierarchically structured with a central clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and a series of peripheral clocks present in the cells of all tissues. At the base of the mechanism there are a series of genes, called "Clock genes", [16, 17] whose regulation influence some processes like fertility and control spermatogenesis, oogenesis, steroidogenesis, pregnancy, and sexual development .
Gut microbiota abundance and metabolic activity presents diurnal circadian rhythm, that are mainly regulated by host nutrition and hormones. The rhythmicity gut microbiota could be loss by the disruption of clock genes highlighting a link among these factors . A role of gut microbiota was observed in sexual development , and studies are focusing to clarify to connect gut microbiota, circadian regulation and sexual development . Accumulating evidence thus suggest that gut microbiota may have an important role in determining the timing of puberty via metabolic and hormonal effects. It is also possible that gut microbiota composition is dependent on hormonal signals . Interestingly, no significant microbiota discrepancies were found among the same sex infant twin pairs, however there were changes in opposite sex . Gut microbiota composition and predicted metabolic profiles exist before puberty and are characteristic in male and female and become more substantial different at puberty . The various species of gut microbiota changed gradually associated with puberty stages. To date, no study has examined the temporal changes of sexual dimorphism in gut microbiota in humans spanning the dynamic hormonal changes from pre-puberty to puberty. Differences in gut microflora at different pubertal status may be related to estrogen and androgen levels .
Growth Hormone (GH)-sexual development, implicated in gonadal development, was related to gut microbiota. Gut microbiota circadian disruption can determine GH signaling impairment, and represent a risk factor for many pathologies [25,26,27]. Furthermore, the GH-signaling-sexual development disruption is a common complication in pathologies linked with both circadian disruption and microbial dysbiosis, as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)  and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) .
Microbiota regulation may be influenced also by Melatonin even if the specific mechanisms are still not well understood, but it seems derived by their rhythm typically of a period of ~ 24 h regulated also by Melatonin release .
Microbiota, circadian regulation and hormones appear to be as linked factors able to influence reciprocally, although the topic is recent, and the more studies are needed to clarify the topic Fig. 1.
Microbial colonization in female
The balance of hosted microbiota, metabolites synthesized, and immune components is necessary for female genital tracts health. Vaginal microbiota (VMB) composition is dominated by Lactobacillus which represents 90–95% of vaginal bacteria. Four most abundant species detected in vaginal tract are Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus jensenii and Lactobacillus gasseri . The importance of Lactobacillus and its species is linked to its ability to synthesize lactic acid (2-Hydroxypropanoic acid) by anaerobic fermentation , produced from vaginal epithelial cells. Estradiol (E2) controls lactic acid production  that contributes to the vaginal environment acidification (pH ≈3.0–4.5), suitable for Lactobacillus bacteria harboring, and enabling them to grow, multiply, and dominate the cervico-vaginal niche . In addition, lactic acid is considered a healthy VMB marker, due to its mild-acid pH shift, which makes cervico-vaginal environment unsuitable for pathogenic colonization . Lactobacillus bacteria, through lactic acid production, are able to up-regulate the autophagy process through cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) inhibition, promoting pathogen bacteria clearing. In order to kill other bacteria and to prevent vaginal colonization by pathogen species, Lactobacillus bacteria synthesize hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and bacteriocins proteins [36, 37], contributing to maintain a healthy genitourinary status. Many other bacterial genera were detected in healthy or not-healthy vaginal microbiota, including Actinomyces, Bacteroides, Campylobacter, Corynebacterium, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Gardnerella, Haemophilus, Salmonella, Shigella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Ureaplasma [38, 39] (Table 1).
The endometrial microbial composition detection is still controversial due to contamination, and its role remains elusive. At first, several pathogen bacterial genera like Enterobacter, Gardnerella, Streptococcus  were detected, and, in recent times, using advanced analytical techniques, Firmicutes phylum  and Lactobacillus and Prevotella genera were detected as the most relative abundant in hysterectomized uterus  (Table 1).
Concerning the fallopian tubes microbial colonization, tubal microbiota (TMB) existence is a topic under study, and it was explored on bilateral salpingectomy surgical samples. In both fertile and menopausal bilateral salpingectomy patients, bacterial phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, and Lactobacillus genera were detected as the most relative abundant (Table 1) and there was detected a difference in right salpinx TMB composition (Staphylococcus) compared to the left one (Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Prevotella)  in pre-post-menopausal tissues. Such difference in different tubal physiological states, suggest a theoretical hormonal influence on TMB composition.
In placental samples were identified Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria phyla (Table 1) similar to oral microbial composition . Furthermore, Mesorhizobium, Ralstonia, Lactobacillus and Ureaplasma genera were found in placenta, although microbial composition changes in the different placental areas were examined .
Role of hormone on female genital tracts microbiota
Many factors act in shaping female genital tracts microbiota composition including lifestyle, hormone, and reproductive age [18, 46]. Current studies detected E2 serum concentration as the most significant factor which determines VMB composition , due to its control of cervico-vaginal Lactobacillus dominance, and, in addition, its concentration depends on patient’s age (reproductive or menopausal), on menstrual cycle phase (follicular or luteal) and on pregnancy state. During menopause, a E2 lower concentration determines a lower glycogen and lactic acid production, with a vaginal pH shift from mild acid-to a less acid (> 4,5) environment, and a consequent loss of the Lactobacillus dominance . A non-Lactobacillus-dominated environment is positively related with colonization/infection by potentially pathogenic bacteria. Postmenopausal patients, which generally have a low E2 serum concentration, show an increase of Escherichia, Shigella, Gardnerella, Prevotella and Enterococcus genera, and menopause state was also positively related with the increase of potential pathogenic genera Varibaculum, Streptococcus, and Veillonella . A positive correlation between E2 concentration and the Lactobacillus dominance was detected in post-menopausal chronic atrophic vaginitis affected patients, however it was highlighted a negative correlation between E2 concentration and the Streptococcus abundance , a common pathogen in bacterial vaginitis .
The E2 levels rise during pregnancy, with an increased abundance of Lactobacillus and a relevant decrease in overall diversity . The major changes in its compositions occur in early pregnancy, while the pregnancy later stages bacterial communities resemble those of the non-pregnant state. In the postpartum period, VMB gradually reverts to baseline characteristics, including a decrease in Lactobacillus abundance, an increase in diversity and enrichment of bacteria associated with vaginosis, such as Actinobacteria .
VMB composition also depends on gonadotropins, as follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentration. A negative correlation between FSH concentration and its composition in VMB was detected, and Paraprevotella abundance was found higher in younger patients, that have a higher FSH concentration . Furthermore, a negative correlation was found between Aerococcus, Atopobium, and LH hormone concentration since their abundance is high in fertility age when the LH concentration rises . On the contrary, Gemella was detected as positively related with both FSH and LH, because its abundance is low during fertility age and rises in menopause .
Female microbiota dysbiosis
A dysbiotic VMB is characterized by the loss of Lactobacillus dominance and the rise of anaerobic bacteria, as Prevotella, Mobiluncus, Gardnerella, Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma [56, 57]. Such dysbiotic environment, represents a risk factor for the bacterial vaginosis onset, an inflammatory disease which can impair fertility in many ways: increasing sexually transmitted bacterial (Chlamydia, Neisseria, Trichomonas)  and viral (human papillomavirus (HPV) diseases, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections) . A dysbiotic VMB represents a risk factor also for adverse pregnancies onset, being correlated to several pregnancy related complications, like preterm delivery , maternal infectious morbidity , late miscarriage  and higher frequency of sudden amnio-chorial membrane rupture before labor onset (preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROMs) . VMB dysbiosis has an impact on IVF-embryo transfer outcomes: patients negative for bacterial contamination showed higher cumulative pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates [10, 63]. Interestingly, a low Lactobacillus abundance was identified as a predictive factor for unfavorable IVF outcome , while Lactobacillus iners as a positive IVF procedure marker and a vaginal microbiota health signal .
The problems connected with microbial contamination, make it hard to define precisely endometrial microbiota (EMB) composition due to Lactobacillus abundance. EMB dysbiosis was related to a significant decrease of IVF live birth rate positive outcomes .
The EMB composition related to reproductive failures was detected as also characterized by high Bacteroides, Pelomonas [66, 67]. However, the use of of NGS techniques permitted to detect Flavobacterium, Corynebacterium, Bifidobacterium, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus in infertile patients .
In placenta, the microbiota composition exerts an influence on pre-term birth or neonatal illnesses. The placental microbiota composition of spontaneous pre-term birth patients with a chorioamnionitis are characterized by high abundance of both urogenital and oral commensal bacteria [69, 70]. However, this data is controversial, because other studies on the contrary detected no microbiota composition differences in spontaneous preterm and natural birth patients (Fig. 2A).
Microbial colonization in male
Many evidences suggest how male genitourinary tracts harbor a commensal microbial fauna, and how the seminal microbiota (SMB) have a multiple combined origin from different urogenital tissues as bladder, prostate and urethra. The seminal fluid represents a particularly suitable environment for the trophic needs of a microbial community, due to the wide range of nutrients, proteins, carbohydrates, and inorganic ions contained in its composition . Both infertile and healthy patients seminal fluids show the presence of microbial bacteria, and in the seminal fluids were detected Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae, Ureaplasma urealyticum species  (Table 2). Recently, many studies found a sperm bacterial seminal fluid composition characterized mainly by the same bacterial phyla both in healthy donors and azoospermic patients . The low quality sperm morphology patients presented an augmented abundance of Ureaplasma, Enterococcus, Mycoplasma, and Prevotella, in opposition to healthy, which showed a major presence of Lactobacillus . In addition, low quality sperm morphology was correlated to the presence of Bacteroides ureolyticus .
Role of hormone on male genital tracts microbiota
Although there are no studies on the subject, it would be possible to hypothesize, based on some indirect evidence, the existence of a hormonal influence on the male genital tract microbiota. Scientific data highlighted how gut microbiota is able to communicate with host distal organs, such as the testis, determining the existence of a gut-microbiota-testis axis . Although the specific mechanisms which regulate this axis have not yet been determined, it was suggest in vivo and in vitro that some endocrine disruptors compounds  leads to a reduction of various endocrine and steroidogenic parameters, such as serum testosterone, LH hormone, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) expression and alter of the gut male microbiota characteristics . However, more studies are needed to adequately address the matter of how endogenous hormonal influences might regulate microbiota in the male.
Seminal microbiota dysbiosis
The detection of a causal relationship among microbial fauna presence in seminal fluid and its influence on spermatogenesis process is a topic under study for the influence on sperm quality parameters (motility, concentration, morphology), and the use of prognostic markers for dispermic conditions (oligozoospermia, astenozoospermia, teratozoospemia), azoospermia and in post-finasteride syndrome .
The most abundant microbial genera detected in dispermic patients and healthy donors are Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, Prevotella and Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria . In low quality samples were detected Prevotella, and Anaerococcus . Prevotella’s abundance was inversely associated with sperm concentration, while Pseudomonas was directly correlated with sperm motility  (Fig. 2B). Lactobacillus genus was significantly decreased in oligo-asthenozoospermic patients. Interestingly, different bacterial genera and species including Ureaplasma, Bacteroides, Anaerococcus, Finegoldia, Lactobacillus and Acinetobacter iwoffii could be used as asthenozoospermia biomarkers .
In azoospermic patients it was shown an increase of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, and a decrease of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, compared to the healthy. In the oligo-astheno-teratozoospermic (OATs) Firmicutes phylum and Neisseria, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas genera resulted as the most relative abundant with a decrease of Lactobacillus . In the hyper-viscosity affected patients, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phylum increased and Lactobacillus was reduced. The SMB composition of testicular tissues performed with micro testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) from idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA) patients , show a decrease in Clostridium abundance in NOA patients with a unsuccessful sperm retrieval compared to successful sperm-retrieval patients .
The effects of microbial trade-off between sexes
Unprotected sexual intercourse determines a bacterial exchange between partners, and in addition, each partner can influence the microbiota composition of other’s reproductive tracts . Regarding the male influence on the female microbiota, the cervico-vaginal flora can be subjected to fluctuations after sexual intercourse, and it can represent a risk factor for bacterial vaginosis onset . Moreover, sexual activity influences the composition and consistency of cervico-vaginal microbiota: it increased relevantly Gardnerella vaginalis in young women (with or without bacterial vaginosis), highlighting also the sexual transmission of potentially pathogenic bacteria . However, bacterial sexual transmission is a difficult topic to deepen because female bacterial fluctuations are not associated only with semen microbial influence, but also with many other factors, including hormones and menstrual cycle .
Several evidence point also to an action of the female microbiota on male’s microbial fauna. Young men with no sexual experience showed lower bacterial diversity and relative abundance in their seminal microbiota, compared with men of the same age with sexual experience . Some vaginal bacteria, as Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners, Gardnerella vaginalis resulted associated to younger men seminal microbiota, while, other genera, as, Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium and Acidovorax were detected in seminal fluid bacterial communities of older men [88, 89]. Even more, there is a correlation between male partner’s inflammatory status with leukocytes in seminal fluids, and the association with Streptococcus agalactiae, Gardnerella vaginalis and other bacterial vaginosis-related bacteria presence . It was reported that Streptococcus agalactiae is present in bacteriospermic samples and that Gardnerella vaginalis is the predominant microorganism in women with partner that had significant leukocytospermia . Bacterial-vaginosis episodes caused by the changing of vaginal microbial communities, was associated to frequent sexual intercourse, multiple sex partners and frequent episodes of receptive oral and anal sex .
Thus, scientific evidence highlighted how both male and female genital microbiota are able to interact by microbial trade off, mainly during sexual intercourses, although specific clinical trial studies are needed to clarify the topic.
In recent years, great progress was made in the study of the microbial fauna associated to gut and genital tracts, detecting the existence of associated microbial communities and determining the effects of bacterial dysbiosis on fertility. Female lower genital tracts showed Lactobacillus-dominated healthy microbiota, and a VMB dysbiosis constitutes a risk factor for both fertility and pregnancy onset. As well, in upper genital tracts it was highlights the existence of endometrial, tubal and placental microbiota. The connections among endometrial and placental microbiota dysbiosis and fertility impairments were deepened even if in the tubal microbiota, there is no study link between dysbiosis and fertility detrimental effects. Seminal fluid dysbiosis is associated with dispermic-azoospermic detrimental conditions. The interactions among female and male genital tracts microbiota during sexual intercourse, and their microbial exchanges were strengthened, highlighting also their parallel and reciprocal effects.
Sex hormones participate in communication between microorganisms and their hosts and play several important physiological roles in reproduction and in sexual development and function.
Alterations in the genital tract microbiota have specific impacts on the reproductive endocrine system and correcting abnormal microbiomes may lead to improved reproductive outcomes. Specific linear correlations between microbiota and serum hormone levels, which may have additional effects on the health of the body, have been reported in some studies.
The knowledge of the infertility problem could be increasingly linked to the understanding of this vast network of interactions on genital tracts microbiota. Furthermore, also a greater experience of the role that the gut microbiota plays on fertility it could be useful to identify novel microbiome-based diagnostics and therapeutics for patients with this complex disease.
Proctor L (2019) Priorities for the next 10 years of human microbiome research. Nature 569(7758):623–625
O’Hara AM, Shanahan F (2006) The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep 7(7):688–693
Belkaid Y, Harrison OJ (2017) Homeostatic immunity and the microbiota. Immunity 46(4):562–576
Desmet L, Thijs T, Segers A, Verbeke K, Depoortere I (2021) Chronodisruption by chronic jetlag impacts metabolic and gastrointestinal homeostasis in male mice. Acta Physiol (Oxf). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113846
Mossadegh-Keller N, Sieweke MH (2018) Testicular macrophages: Guardians of fertility. Cell Immunol 330:120–125
Baptissart M, Vega A, Martinot E, Pommier AJ, Houten SM, Marceau G, de Haze A, Baron S, Schoonjans K, Lobaccaro JM, Volle DH (2014) Bile acids alter male fertility through G-protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 signaling pathways in mice. Hepatology 60(3):1054–1065
Sonowal R, Swimm A, Sahoo A, Luo L, Matsunaga Y, Wu Z, Bhingarde JA, Ejzak EA, Ranawade A, Qadota H, Powell DN, Capaldo CT, Flacker JM, Jones RM, Benian GM, Kalman D (2017) Indoles from commensal bacteria extend healthspan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(36):E7506-e7515
Selvaraj V, Zakroczymski MA, Naaz A, Mukai M, Ju YH, Doerge DR, Katzenellenbogen JA, Helferich WG, Cooke PS (2004) Estrogenicity of the isoflavone metabolite equol on reproductive and non-reproductive organs in mice. Biol Reprod 71(3):966–972
Nobs SP, Zmora N, Elinav E (2020) Nutrition regulates innate immunity in health and disease. Annu Rev Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-120919-094440
Sirota I, Zarek SM, Segars JH (2014) Potential influence of the microbiome on infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Semin Reprod Med 32(1):35–42
García-Velasco JA, Budding D, Campe H, Malfertheiner SF, Hamamah S, Santjohanser C, Schuppe-Koistinen I, Nielsen HS, Vieira-Silva S, Laven J (2020) The reproductive microbiome - clinical practice recommendations for fertility specialists. Reprod Biomed Online 41(3):443–453
Baqui AH, Lee ACC, Koffi AK, Khanam R, Mitra DK, Dasgupta SK, Uddin J, Ahmed P, Rafiqullah I, Rahman M, Quaiyum A, Koumans EH, Christian P, Saha SK, Mullany LC, Labrique A (2019) Prevalence of and risk factors for abnormal vaginal flora and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes in a rural district in north-east Bangladesh. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98(3):309–319
Koedooder R, Singer M, Schoenmakers S, Savelkoul PHM, Morré SA, de Jonge JD, Poort L, Cuypers W, Beckers NGM, Broekmans FJM, Cohlen BJ, den Hartog JE, Fleischer K, Lambalk CB, Smeenk J, Budding AE, Laven JSE (2019) The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study. Hum Reprod 34(6):1042–1054
Heil BA, Paccamonti DL, Sones JL (2019) Role for the mammalian female reproductive tract microbiome in pregnancy outcomes. Physiol Genom 51(8):390–399
Lundy SD, Sangwan N, Parekh NV, Selvam MKP, Gupta S, McCaffrey P, Bessoff K, Vala A, Agarwal A, Sabanegh ES, Vij SC, Eng C (2021) Functional and taxonomic dysbiosis of the gut, urine, and semen microbiomes in male infertility. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.014
Buijs RM, Soto Tinoco EC, Hurtado Alvarado G, Escobar C (2021) The circadian system: From clocks to physiology. Handb Clin Neurol 179:233–247
Minnetti M, Hasenmajer V, Pofi R, Venneri MA, Alexandraki KI, Isidori AM (2020) Fixing the broken clock in adrenal disorders: focus on glucocorticoids and chronotherapy. J Endocrinol 246(2):R13-r31
Sciarra F, Franceschini E, Campolo F, Gianfrilli D, Pallotti F, Paoli D, Isidori AM, Venneri MA (2020) Disruption of circadian rhythms: a crucial factor in the etiology of infertility. Int J Mol Sci 21(11):3943
Thaiss CA, Zeevi D, Levy M, Zilberman-Schapira G, Suez J, Tengeler AC, Abramson L, Katz MN, Korem T, Zmora N, Kuperman Y, Biton I, Gilad S, Harmelin A, Shapiro H, Halpern Z, Segal E, Elinav E (2014) Transkingdom control of microbiota diurnal oscillations promotes metabolic homeostasis. Cell 159(3):514–529
Yuan X, Chen R, Zhang Y, Lin X, Yang X (2020) Gut microbiota: effect of pubertal status. BMC Microbiol 20(1):334
Weger BD, Rawashdeh O, Gachon F (2019) At the intersection of microbiota and circadian clock: are sexual dimorphism and growth hormones the missing link to pathology? Circadian clock and microbiota: potential egffect on growth hormone and sexual development. Bioessays 41(9):e1900059
Yuan X, Chen R, Zhang Y, Lin X, Yang X (2020) Sexual dimorphism of gut microbiota at different pubertal status. Microbial Cell Factor 19(1):152
Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP, Heath AC, Warner B, Reeder J, Kuczynski J, Caporaso JG, Lozupone CA, Lauber C, Clemente JC, Knights D, Knight R, Gordon JI (2012) Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486(7402):222–227
Kundu P, Blacher E, Elinav E, Pettersson S (2017) Our gut microbiome: the evolving inner self. Cell 171(7):1481–1493
Chen J, Wang W, Guo Z, Huang S, Lei H, Zang P, Lu B, Shao J, Gu P (2021) Associations between gut microbiota and thyroidal function status in Chinese patients with Graves’ disease. J Endocrinol Invest 44(9):1913–1926
Wei J, Qing Y, Zhou H, Liu J, Qi C, Gao J (2021) 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of gut microbiota in gestational diabetes mellitus and their correlation with disease risk factors. J Endocrinol Invest. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-021-01595-4
Shi TT, Xin Z, Hua L, Wang H, Zhao RX, Yang YL, Xie RR, Liu HY, Yang JK (2021) Comparative assessment of gut microbial composition and function in patients with Graves’ disease and Graves’ orbitopathy. J Endocrinol Invest 44(2):297–310
Sanderson IR (2014) Growth problems in children with IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(10):601–610
Liang Z, Di N, Li L, Yang D (2021) Gut microbiota alterations reveal potential gut-brain axis changes in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest 44(8):1727–1737
Bishehsari F, Voigt RM, Keshavarzian A (2020) Circadian rhythms and the gut microbiota: from the metabolic syndrome to cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol 16(12):731–739
Riganelli L, Iebba V, Piccioni M, Illuminati I, Bonfiglio G, Neroni B, Calvo L, Gagliardi A, Levrero M, Merlino L, Mariani M, Capri O, Pietrangeli D, Schippa S, Guerrieri F (2020) Structural variations of vaginal and endometrial microbiota: hints on female infertility. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:350
Nasioudis D, Beghini J, Bongiovanni AM, Giraldo PC, Linhares IM, Witkin SS (2015) α-amylase in vaginal fluid: association with conditions favorable to dominance of lactobacillus. Reproduct Sci (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) 22(11): 1393–1398
Pino A, Bartolo E, Caggia C, Cianci A, Randazzo CL (2019) Detection of vaginal lactobacilli as probiotic candidates. Sci Rep 9(1):3355
O'Hanlon DE, Come RA, Moench TR (219) Vaginal pH measured in vivo: lactobacilli determine pH and lactic acid concentration. BMC Microbiol 19(1):13
Collins SL, McMillan A, Seney S, van der Veer C, Kort R, Sumarah MW, Reid G (2018) Promising prebiotic candidate established by evaluation of lactitol, lactulose, raffinose, and oligofructose for maintenance of a lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 84(5):e02200
Leizer J, Nasioudis D, Forney LJ, Schneider GM, Gliniewicz K, Boester A, Witkin SS (2018) Properties of epithelial cells and vaginal secretions in pregnant women when lactobacillus crispatus or lactobacillus iners dominate the vaginal microbiome. Reproduct Sci (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) 25(6): 854–860
Lu Y, Aizhan R, Yan H, Li X, Wang X, Yi Y, Shan Y, Liu B, Zhou Y, Lü X (2020) Characterization, modes of action, and application of a novel broad-spectrum bacteriocin BM1300 produced by Lactobacillus crustorum MN047. Braz J Microbio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-020-00311-3
France MT, Rutt L, Narina S, Arbaugh S, McComb E, Humphrys MS, Ma B, Hayward MR, Costello EK, Relman DA, Kwon DS, Ravel J (2020) Complete genome sequences of six lactobacillus iners strains isolated from the human vagina. Microbiol Resour Announc. https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.00234-20
García-Velasco JA, Menabrito M, Catalán IB (2017) What fertility specialists should know about the vaginal microbiome: a review. Reprod Biomed Online 35(1):103–112
Møller BR, Kristiansen FV, Thorsen P, Frost L, Mogensen SC (1995) Sterility of the uterine cavity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74(3):216–219
Miles SM, Hardy BL, Merrell DS (2017) Investigation of the microbiota of the reproductive tract in women undergoing a total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy. Fertil Steril 107(3):813-820.e1
Mitchell CM, Haick A, Nkwopara E, Garcia R, Rendi M, Agnew K, Fredricks DN, Eschenbach D (2015) Colonization of the upper genital tract by vaginal bacterial species in nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(5):611.e1–9
Pelzer ES, Willner D, Huygens F, Hafner LM, Lourie R, Buttini M (2018) Fallopian tube microbiota: evidence beyond DNA. Future Microbiol 13:1355–1361
Aagaard K, Ma J, Antony KM, Ganu R, Petrosino J, Versalovic J (2014) The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008599
Parnell LA, Briggs CM, Cao B, Delannoy-Bruno O, Schrieffer AE, Mysorekar IU (2017) Microbial communities in placentas from term normal pregnancy exhibit spatially variable profiles. Sci Rep 7(1):11200
Tomaiuolo R, Veneruso I, Cariati F, D’Argenio V (2020) Microbiota and Human Reproduction: The Case of Female Infertility. High-Throughput. https://doi.org/10.3390/ht9020012
Xu J, Bian G, Zheng M, Lu G, Chan WY, Li W, Yang K, Chen ZJ, Du Y (2020) Fertility factors affect the vaginal microbiome in women of reproductive age. Am J Reprod Immunol 83(4):e13220
Gliniewicz K, Schneider GM, Ridenhour BJ, Williams CJ, Song Y, Farage MA, Miller K, Forney LJ (2019) Comparison of the vaginal microbiomes of premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Front Microbiol 10:193
Brotman RM, Shardell MD, Gajer P, Fadrosh D, Chang K, Silver MI, Viscidi RP, Burke AE, Ravel J, Gravitt PE (2018) Association between the vaginal microbiota, menopause status, and signs of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause 25(11):1321–1330
Heinemann C, Reid G (2005) Vaginal microbial diversity among postmenopausal women with and without hormone replacement therapy. Can J Microbiol 51(9):777–781
Donders GGG, Bellen G, Grinceviciene S, Ruban K, Vieira-Baptista P (2017) Aerobic vaginitis: no longer a stranger. Res Microbiol 168(9–10):845–858
Miller EA, Beasley DE, Dunn RR, Archie EA (1936) Lactobacilli dominance and vaginal ph: why is the human vaginal microbiome unique? Front Microbiol 2016:7
Neuman H, Koren O (2017) The pregnancy microbiome. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser 88:1–9
Ling Z, Kong J, Liu F, Zhu H, Chen X, Wang Y, Li L, Nelson KE, Xia Y, Xiang C (2010) Molecular analysis of the diversity of vaginal microbiota associated with bacterial vaginosis. BMC Genom 11:488
Sabo MC, Lehman DA, Wang B, Richardson BA, Srinivasan S, Osborn L, Matemo D, Kinuthia J, Fiedler TL, Munch MM, Drake AL, Fredricks DN, Overbaugh J, John-Stewart G, McClelland RS, Graham SM (2020) Associations between vaginal bacteria implicated in HIV acquisition risk and proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Sex Transm Infect 96(1):3–9
Srinivasan S, Morgan MT, Fiedler TL, Djukovic D, Hoffman NG, Raftery D, Marrazzo JM, Fredricks DN (2015) Metabolic signatures of bacterial vaginosis. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00204-15
Verstraelen H, Swidsinski A (2013) The biofilm in bacterial vaginosis: implications for epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis 26(1):86–89
Rajabpour M, Emamie AD, Pourmand MR, Goodarzi NN, Asbagh FA, Whiley DM (2020) Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis among women with genitourinary infection and pregnancy-related complications in Tehran: A cross-sectional study. Int J STD AIDS 956462420922462
Jeršovienė V, Gudlevičienė Ž, Rimienė J, Butkauskas D (2019) Human Papillomavirus and Infertility. Medicina (Kaunas). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462420922462
Tabatabaei N, Eren AM, Barreiro LB, Yotova V, Dumaine A, Allard C, Fraser WD (2019) Vaginal microbiome in early pregnancy and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a case-control study. BJOG 126(3):349–358
Laxmi U, Agrawal S, Raghunandan C, Randhawa VS, Saili A (2012) Association of bacterial vaginosis with adverse fetomaternal outcome in women with spontaneous preterm labor: a prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25(1):64–67
Bennett PR, Brown RG, MacIntyre DA (2020) Vaginal Microbiome in Preterm Rupture of Membranes. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 47(4):503–521
Haahr T, Jensen JS, Thomsen L, Duus L, Rygaard K, Humaidan P (2016) Abnormal vaginal microbiota may be associated with poor reproductive outcomes: a prospective study in IVF patients. Hum Reprod 31(4):795–803
Tärnberg M, Jakobsson T, Jonasson J, Forsum U (2002) Identification of randomly selected colonies of lactobacilli from normal vaginal fluid by pyrosequencing of the 16S rDNA variable V1 and V3 regions. APMIS 110(11):802–810
Moreno I, Codoñer FM, Vilella F, Valbuena D, Martinez-Blanch JF, Jimenez-Almazán J, Alonso R, Alamá P, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Ramon D, Simon C (2016) Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215(6):684–703
Verstraelen H, Vilchez-Vargas R, Desimpel F, Jauregui R, Vankeirsbilck N, Weyers S, Verhelst R, De Sutter P, Pieper DH, Van De Wiele T (2016) Characterisation of the human uterine microbiome in non-pregnant women through deep sequencing of the V1–2 region of the 16S rRNA gene. PeerJ 4:e1602
Chen C, Song X, Wei W, Zhong H, Dai J, Lan Z, Li F, Yu X, Feng Q, Wang Z, Xie H, Chen X, Zeng C, Wen B, Zeng L, Du H, Tang H, Xu C, Xia Y, Xia H, Yang H, Wang J, Wang J, Madsen L, Brix S, Kristiansen K, Xu X, Li J, Wu R, Jia H (2017) The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nat Commun 8(1):875
Garcia-Grau I, Perez-Villaroya D, Bau D, Gonzalez-Monfort M, Vilella F, Moreno I, Simon C (2019) Taxonomical and functional assessment of the endometrial microbiota in a context of recurrent reproductive failure: a case report. Pathogens 8(4)
Doyle RM, Harris K, Kamiza S, Harjunmaa U, Ashorn U, Nkhoma M, Dewey KG, Maleta K, Ashorn P, Klein N (2017) Bacterial communities found in placental tissues are associated with severe chorioamnionitis and adverse birth outcomes. PLoS One 12(7):e0180167
Prince AL, Ma J, Kannan PS, Alvarez M, Gisslen T, Harris RA, Sweeney EL, Knox CL, Lambers DS, Jobe AH, Chougnet CA, Kallapur SG, Aagaard KM (2016) The placental membrane microbiome is altered among subjects with spontaneous preterm birth with and without chorioamnionitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(5):627.e1-627.e16
Caballero-Campo P, Lira-Albarrán S, Barrera D, Borja-Cacho E, Godoy-Morales HS, Rangel-Escareño C, Larrea F, Chirinos M (2020) Gene transcription profiling of astheno- and normo-zoospermic sperm subpopulations. Asian J Androl
Moretti E, Capitani S, Figura N, Pammolli A, Federico MG, Giannerini V, Collodel G (2009) The presence of bacteria species in semen and sperm quality. J Assist Reprod Genet 26(1):47–56
Yang H, Zhang J, Xue Z, Zhao C, Lei L, Wen Y, Dong Y, Yang J, Zhang L (2020) Potential pathogenic bacteria in seminal microbiota of patients with different types of dysspermatism. Sci Rep 10(1):6876
Farahani L, Tharakan T, Yap T, Ramsay JW, Jayasena CN, Minhas S (2021) The semen microbiome and its impact on sperm function and male fertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology 9(1):115–144
Balmelli T, Stamm J, Dolina-Giudici M, Peduzzi R, Piffaretti-Yanez A, Balerna M (1994) Bacteroides ureolyticus in men consulting for infertility. Andrologia 26(1):35–38
Li X, Cheng W, Shang H, Wei H, Deng C (2021) The interplay between androgen and gut microbiota: is there a microbiota-gut-testis axis. reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
Zhao TX, Wei YX, Wang JK, Han LD, Sun M, Wu YH, Shen LJ, Long CL, Wu SD, Wei GH (2020) The gut-microbiota-testis axis mediated by the activation of the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway is related to prepuberal steroidogenesis disorders induced by di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27(28):35261–35271
Hou X, Zhu L, Zhang X, Zhang L, Bao H, Tang M, Wei R, Wang R (2019) Testosterone disruptor effect and gut microbiome perturbation in mice: Early life exposure to doxycycline. Chemosphere 222:722–731
Borgo F, Macandog AD, Diviccaro S, Falvo E, Giatti S, Cavaletti G, Melcangi RC (2021) Alterations of gut microbiota composition in post-finasteride patients: a pilot study. J Endocrinol Invest 44(6):1263–1273
Osadchiy V, Mills JN, Mayer EA, Eleswarapu SV (2020) The Seminal Microbiome and Male Factor Infertility. Curr Sex Health Rep 12(3):202–207
Monteiro C, Marques PI, Cavadas B, Damião I, Almeida V, Barros N, Barros A, Carvalho F, Gomes S, Seixas S (2018) Characterization of microbiota in male infertility cases uncovers differences in seminal hyperviscosity and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia possibly correlated with increased prevalence of infectious bacteria. Am J Reprod Immunol 79(6):e12838
Sciarra F, Pelloni M, Faja F, Pallotti F, Martino G, Radicioni AF, Lenzi A, Lombardo F, Paoli D (2019) Incidence of Y chromosome microdeletions in patients with Klinefelter syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest 42(7):833–842
Alfano M, Ferrarese R, Locatelli I, Ventimiglia E, Ippolito S, Gallina P, Cesana D, Canducci F, Pagliardini L, Viganò P, Clementi M, Nebuloni M, Montorsi F, Salonia A (2018) Testicular microbiome in azoospermic men-first evidence of the impact of an altered microenvironment. Hum Reprod 33(7):1212–1217
Mändar R, Punab M, Borovkova N, Lapp E, Kiiker R, Korrovits P, Metspalu A, Krjutškov K, Nõlvak H, Preem JK, Oopkaup K, Salumets A, Truu J (2015) Complementary seminovaginal microbiome in couples. Res Microbiol 166(5):440–447
Plummer EL, Vodstrcil LA, Danielewski JA, Murray GL, Fairley CK, Garland SM, Hocking JS, Tabrizi SN, Bradshaw CS (2018) Combined oral and topical antimicrobial therapy for male partners of women with bacterial vaginosis: Acceptability, tolerability and impact on the genital microbiota of couples - A pilot study. PLoS One 13(1):e0190199
Vodstrcil LA, Twin J, Garland SM, Fairley CK, Hocking JS, Law MG, Plummer EL, Fethers KA, Chow EP, Tabrizi SN, Bradshaw CS (2017) The influence of sexual activity on the vaginal microbiota and Gardnerella vaginalis clade diversity in young women. PLoS One 12(2):e0171856
Morison L, Ekpo G, West B, Demba E, Mayaud P, Coleman R, Bailey R, Walraven G (2005) Bacterial vaginosis in relation to menstrual cycle, menstrual protection method, and sexual intercourse in rural Gambian women. Sex Transm Infect 81(3):242–247
Mändar R, Türk S, Korrovits P, Ausmees K, Punab M (2018) Impact of sexual debut on culturable human seminal microbiota. Andrology 6(3):510–512
Weng SL, Chiu CM, Lin FM, Huang WC, Liang C, Yang T, Yang TL, Liu CY, Wu WY, Chang YA, Chang TH, Huang HD (2014) Bacterial communities in semen from men of infertile couples: metagenomic sequencing reveals relationships of seminal microbiota to semen quality. PLoS One 9(10):e110152
Mändar R, Punab M, Korrovits P, Türk S, Ausmees K, Lapp E, Preem JK, Oopkaup K, Salumets A, Truu J (2017) Seminal microbiome in men with and without prostatitis. Int J Urol 24(3):211–216
Cherpes TL, Hillier SL, Meyn LA, Busch JL, Krohn MA (2008) A delicate balance: risk factors for acquisition of bacterial vaginosis include sexual activity, absence of hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli, black race, and positive herpes simplex virus type 2 serology. Sex Transm Dis 35(1):78–83
No financial support has been received.
Conflict of interest
All other authors have nothing to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Venneri, M.A., Franceschini, E., Sciarra, F. et al. Human genital tracts microbiota: dysbiosis crucial for infertility. J Endocrinol Invest 45, 1151–1160 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-022-01752-3
- Genital tracts