Abstract
From an operant perspective, verbal behavior is multiply controlled by different sources of stimulation, including self-stimulation. Self-stimulation (i.e., responding with respect to one’s own response products) is thought to be especially important for verbal mediation that temporally extends discriminative stimulus control. While previous research has examined the effects of self-stimulation across multiple dimensions of verbal responding, stimulus control of patterns of self-stimulation in conjunction with other patterns of discriminative stimuli of different modalities have arguably received less attention. The purpose of this study was to examine relations between patterns of self-stimulation and different types of verbal discriminative stimulation (i.e., visual and auditory) through differences in their contribution to verbal response accuracy in a recall task. Using a novel online task, participants completed a series of trials in which they (1) typed a 7-digit sequence of digits presented to them either visually or auditorily in which response products were (a) unmasked (typing different keys produced different characters) or (b) masked (typing different keys produced the same character) in the initial response phase, (2) engaged in an intervening activity in the distractor phase, and (3) retyped the same sequence of digits during the recall phase that was initially presented during the initial response phase. While no significant differences in accuracy of digits submitted during recall phases were observed with respect to visual and auditory verbal discriminative stimuli, the average total number of correct digits typed during recall phases was found to be higher when response products were unmasked in the initial response phase than when they were masked.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Although some might disagree (Stewart et al., 2013; Sundberg et al., 2018), even relating is often described as operant activity that mediates subsequent activity by transforming the functional properties of stimuli in accordance with a historically established relational network. Hayes et al. (2001) contend that, “relating one event to another and combining relations among events are flexible behaviors under specific environmental control” (p. 42). Barnes-Holmes et al. (2020) adhere to a similar conceptualization by stating that relating can increase the probability of subsequent orienting and evoking. Likewise, self-generating rules can be considered reinforced relational activity that serves to maximize reinforcement by altering the probability of other operant activity (Bern et al., 2020).
It should be noted that terms other than “control” are often used in contemporary molar (and interbehavioral) frameworks. In molar frameworks, patterns of behavioral and environmental events are often viewed as interdependent; neither pattern controls the other, at least not without adherence to both controlling one another because both patterns are dependent on one another (c.f., Baum, 2020). In interbehavioral frameworks, bidirectional, functional relations obviate discussing behavior in terms of control and comparable constructs (c.f., Kantor, 1977).
The term “subtle” is used in this paper to denote difficulty discerning some forms of activity of a whole organism without delimiting it as private or covert activity of part of a whole organism. Parrott (1984) uses this term for a similar reason, and Hayes and Fryling (2009) discuss this issue at length.
References
Alvero, A. M., & Austin, J. (2006). An implementation of protocol analysis and the silent dog method in the area of behavioral safety. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393027
Arntzen, E., Halstadtro, L. B., & Halstadtro, M. (2009). The “silent dog” method: Analyzing the impact of self-generated rules when teaching different computer chains to boys with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393069
Baum, W. M. (2002). From molecular to molar: A paradigm shift in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.78-95
Baum, W. M. (2018). Multiscale behavior analysis and molar behaviorism: An overview. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 110(3), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.476
Baum, W. M. (2020). Avoidance, induction, and the illusion of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 114(1), 116–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.615
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McEnteggart, C. (2020). Updating RFT (more field than frame) and its implications for process-based therapy. The Psychological Record, 70(4), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00372-3
Bergmann, S., & Kodak, T. (2023). The tact is being emitted by the child: Replicating and extending parity research with English-speaking, typically developing children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-023-00188-x.
Bern, R., Persdotter, T., Harte, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2020). Relational coherence and persistent rule-following: The impact of targeting coherence in a “non-critical” component of a relational network. The Psychological Record, 71(2), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00414-1
Bloh, C. (2016). Assessing topography-based versus stimulus-selection-based verbal behavior: A comparison from the literature. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000028
Blough, D. S. (1959). Delayed matching in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1959.2-151
Cabello, F., Luciano, C., Gomez, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Human schedule performance, protocol analysis, and the “silent dog” methodology. The Psychological Record, 54(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395482
Clough, C. W., Meyer, C. S., & Miguel, C. F. (2016). The effects of blocking and joint control training on sequencing visual stimuli. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(2), 242–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0067-1
DeBernardis, G. M., Hayes, L. J., & Fryling, M. J. (2014). Perspective taking as a continuum. The Psychological Record, 64(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0008-0
Delaney, P. F., & Austin, J. (1998). Memory as behavior: The importance of acquisition and remembering strategies. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392925
DeSouza, A. A., Fisher, W. W., & Rodriguez, N. M. (2018). Facilitating the emergence of convergent intraverbals in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.520
Esch, J. W., Mahoney, A. M., Kestner, K. M., LaLonde, K. B., & Esch, B. E. (2013). Echoic and self-echoic responses in children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29(1), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393129
Faloon, B. J., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2008). The role of overt and covert self-rules in establishing a daily living skill in adults with mild developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2008.41-393
Fryling, M. J. (2017). The functional independence of Skinner’s verbal operants: Conceptual and applied implications. Behavioral Interventions, 32(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1462
Gamba, J., Goyos, C., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2015). The functional independence of mands and tacts: Has it been demonstrated empirically? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31(1), 10–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0026-7
Gutierrez, R. D. (2006). The role of rehearsal in joint control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393038
Harman, M. J., Kodak, T., Bohl, L., & Mayland, T. (2021). The effects of competing verbal behavior on performance in a math task. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 37(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-021-00145-6
Hayes, L. J., & Fryling, M. J. (2009). Overcoming the pseudo-problem of private events in the analysis of behavior. Behavior and Philosophy, 37(1), 39–67 https://www/jstor.org/stable/41472421
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Plenum Press.
Hayes, S. C., Law, S., Assemi, K., Falletta-Cowden, N., Shamblin, M., Burliegh, K., Olla, R., Forman, M., & Smith, P. (2021). Relating is an operant: A fly over of 35 years of RFT research. Perspectivas Em Análise Do Comportamento, 12(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.18761/PAC.2021.v12.RFT.02
Hayes, S. C., White, D., & Bissett, R. T. (1998). Protocol analysis and the “silent dog” method of analyzing the impact of self-generated rules. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392923
Hyten, C., & Chase, P. N. (1991). An analysis of self-editing: Method and preliminary findings. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior: The first international institute on verbal relations (pp. 67–81). Context Press.
Kantor, J. R. (1977). Psychological linguistics. Principia Press.
Lowenkron, B. (1984). Coding responses and the generalization of matching to sample in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.42-1
Lowenkron, B. (1988). Generalization of delayed identity matching in retarded children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-163
Lowenkron, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69(3), 327–354. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1998.69-327
Lowenkron, B. (2006). Joint control and the selection of stimuli from their description. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393035
Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392802
Michael, J., Palmer, D. C., & Sundberg, M. L. (2011). The multiple control of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393089
Miguel, C. F. (2018). Problem-solving, bidirectional naming, and the development of verbal repertoires. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(4), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000110
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & CONSORT Group. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134(8), 657–662. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00011
Nevin, J. A., Davison, M., Odum, A. L., & Shahan, T. A. (2007). A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88(2), 285–317. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.88-285
Nevin, J. A., Shahan, T. A., Odum, A. L., & Ward, R. (2012). Delayed matching to sample: Reinforcement has opposite effects on resistance to change in two related procedures. Learning & Behavior, 40(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-011-0059-x
Palmer, D. C. (1991). A behavioral interpretation of memory. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 261–279). Context Press.
Palmer, D. C. (1996). Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 289–290. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-289
Parrott, L. J. (1984). Listening and understanding. The Behavior Analyst, 7(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391883
Petursdottir, A. I., & Ingvarsson, E. T. (2023). Revisiting topography-based and selection-based verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 39(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-023-00182-3.
Rachlin, H. (1992). Teleological behaviorism. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1371–1382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1371
Rachlin, H. (2013a). About teleological behaviorism. The Behavior Analyst, 36(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392307
Rachlin, H. (2013b). Notes on discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2006.85-05
Rachlin, H. (2018). Is talking to yourself thinking? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.273
Schlinger, H. D. (1990). A reply to behavior analysts writing about rules and rule-governed behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392849
Skinner, B. F. (1984). An operant analysis of problem solving. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(4), 583–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00027412
Skinner, B. F. (2014). Verbal behavior (3rd ed.). B. F. Skinner Foundation. (original work published in 1957).
Stauch, T., LaLonde, K., Plavnick, J. B., Savana Bak, M. Y., & Gatewood, K. (2017). Intraverbal training for individuals with autism: The current status of multiple control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 33(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-017-0079-5
Stewart, I., McElwee, J., & Ming, S. (2013). Language generativity, response generalization, and derived relational responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393131
Sundberg, C. T., Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, J. (2018). Covert verbal mediation in arbitrary matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109(3), 600–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.434
Taylor, I., & O’Reilly, M. F. (1997). Toward a functional analysis of private verbal self-regulation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1997.30-43
Tyrberg, M. J., Parking, T., & Lundgren, T. (2021). Patterns of relational framing in executive function: An investigation of the Wisconsin card sorting test. The Psychological Record, 71(3), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-021-00459-w
Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. L. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10(2), 217–227 https://www.jstor.org/stable/27759007
Vosters, M. E., & Luczynski, K. C. (2020). Emergent completion of multistep instructions via joint control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1432–1451. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.670
White, K. G. (2018). Direct remembering, mediated remembering, and atypical forgetting functions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.298
Wright, A. A. (2007). An experimental analysis of memory processing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88(3), 405–433. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.88-405
Acknowledgements
This manuscript is based on and extends thesis research conducted in partial fulfillment of the first author’s master’s degree requirements. The authors would like to thank Bethany Contreras, MaryAnne Demchak, Michael Gomez, Caitlin Vaca, and Melanie Stites for their help on this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
Approval was obtained from the institutional review board of the authors’ affiliated institution.
Informed Consent
In accordance with institutional review board approval, informed consent was given by all participants prior to participation in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(XLSX 248 kb)
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, J., Fleming, W. & Hayes, L.J. Relations between Verbal Self-Stimulation, Stimulus Modality, and Accuracy in an Operant Task. Analysis Verbal Behav (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-024-00201-x
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-024-00201-x