Skip to main content
Log in

An Implementation of Protocol Analysis and the Silent Dog Method in the Area of Behavioral Safety

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that conducting safety observations increases the safety performance of the observer. The purpose of this study was to help determine whether observers make self-verbalizations regarding their own safety performance and whether these reports are functionally related to safety performance. In order to answer these questions two experiments were conducted using both protocol analysis and the silent dog method. The objective of Experiment 1 was (a) to determine whether safety performance with continuous, concurrent talk-aloud procedures is functionally equivalent to safety performance without talk-aloud reports, and (b) to determine whether that safety performance is altered when participants are presented with a distracter task. The goal of Experiment 2 was to determine whether the safety-related verbalizations made by Experiment 1 participants were task-relevant and functionally related to safety performance. The results from both Experiments 1 and 2 provide support for the existence of a functional relationship between safety-related verbalizations and increases in safety performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, J. L., & Redmon, W. K. (1992). Contingency specifying stimuli: The role of “rules” in organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvero, A. M. & Austin, J. (2003). The observer effect. In T. McSween (Ed.), The values-based safety process (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvero, A. M., & Austin, J. (2004). The observer effect: The effects of conducting behavioral observations on the behavior of the observer. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 457–468.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., & Delaney, P. F. (1998). Protocol analysis as a tool for behavior analysis. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 41–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M. (1977). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167–172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C. T., Langholtz, H. J., Auble, J., & Sopchak, B. (1998). Resource-allocation strategies: A verbal protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 70–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Problem solving in semantically rich domains: An example from engineering thermodynamics. Cognitive Science, 1, 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, E., & Schlinger, H. (1987). Rules: Function-altering contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 183–187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A. C. (1892). The memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. Reprinted in Sherlock Holmes: Complete novels and stories (Vol. 1, pp. 455–477). New York: Bantam Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1983). Similar reactivity produced by external cues and self-monitoring. Behavior Modification, 7, 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., White, D., & Bissett, R. T. (1998). Protocol analysis and the “silent dog” method of analyzing the impact of self-generated rules. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 57–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. (1985). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, F. H., & Gaelick-Buys, L. (1991). Self-management methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people change (4th ed.) (pp. 305–360). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, J. (1986). Toward effective supervision: An operant analysis and comparison of managers at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, J., Barwick, K. K., & Scott, L. R. (1978). A behavioral approach to occupational safety: Pinpointing and reinforcing safe performance in a food manufacturing plant. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 434–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, J., Heinzmann, A. T., & Lawson, L. (1980). Effect of training and feedback: Component analysis of a behavioral safety program. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 261–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, T. R. (1997). The behavior-based safety process. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malott, R. W. (1992). A theory of rule-governed behavior and organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawhinney, T. C., & Austin, J. (1999). Using concurrent verbal reports to examine data analyst verbal behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 18(4), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSween, T. E. (2003). The values-based safety process (2nd ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (1998). OSHA Ergonomics Report DT931018 [Data file]. Available from: http://www.oshaslc.gov/SLTC/ergonomics/ergo-hiosh.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Health and Safety Information System. (1998). Safety manuals [Data file]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/od/ohs/default.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsonson, B. S. (1999). Evaluating experimental and quasi-experimental field data. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 18(4), 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1992). The visual analysis of data, and current research into the stimuli controlling it. In T. R. Kratochwill, & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 15–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M. (1988). Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Use and abuse of subjects’ verbal reports. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 71–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (1974). Self-control. Behaviorism, 2, 94–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, J. (2002). Examining the effects of conducting behavior-based safety observations. Unpublished master’s thesis, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D. (1993). Separating discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 9–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Fellner, D. (1984). Searching for performance targets in the behavioral analysis of occupational health and safety: An assessment strategy. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 6(2), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulfert, E., Dougher, M. J., & Greenway, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia M. Alvero.

Additional information

The research presented in this manuscript was part of the first author’s dissertation work at Western Michigan University, which was funded, in part, by the Western Michigan University Graduate College Travel and Research Grant. Some of the data from this paper were previously presented at the 29th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis in San Francisco, CA.

The authors would like to extend many thanks to all of the research assistants who helped with the extensive data collection process.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alvero, A.M., Austin, J. An Implementation of Protocol Analysis and the Silent Dog Method in the Area of Behavioral Safety. Analysis Verbal Behav 22, 61–79 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393027

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393027

Key words

Navigation