Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Strongly rational sets for normal-form games

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce the concept of minimal strong curb sets which is a set-theoretic coarsening of the notion of strong Nash equilibrium. Strong curb sets are product sets of pure strategies such that each player’s set of recommended strategies contains all actions she may rationally select in every coalition she might belong to, for any belief each coalition member may have that is consistent with the recommendations to the other players. Minimal strong curb sets are shown to exist and are compared with other well-known solution concepts. We provide a dynamic learning process leading the players to play strategies from a minimal strong curb set only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Many games of interest lack strong Nash equilibria Aumann (1959).

  2. Players choose pure strategies and hold mixed beliefs. The notion of strong curb set can be easily extended to mixed strategies simply by accommodating the definition of \(\mathrm{CBR}\).

  3. The product set of actions chosen in every strict strong Nash equilibrium is a minimal strong curb set. Conversely, for every minimal strong curb set composed of one action per player, the strategy profile in which each player selects this action is a strict strong Nash equilibrium.

  4. In the appendix we show that the existence result holds for every game \(G\in \mathcal {G}\), where \(\mathcal {G}\) is the class of normal-form games \( G=\left\langle N,\left\{ A_{i}\right\} _{i\in N},\left\{ u_{i}\right\} _{i\in N}\right\rangle \) such that for each player \(i\in N=\left\{ 1,2,\ldots ,n\right\} \), \(A_{i}\) is a compact subset of a metric space and \( u_{i}:\) \(A\rightarrow \mathbb {R} \) is a continuous von Neumann–Morgenstern utility function.

  5. See also Ambrus (2009) and Herings et al. (2004).

  6. Prep sets (Voorneveld 2004) are product sets of pure strategies such that each player’s set of recommended strategies must contain at least one best-response to whatever belief she may have that is consistent with the recommendations to the other players. Voorneveld (2005) has shown that, in generic games, persistent retracts (Kalai and Samet 1984), minimal prep sets and minimal curb sets coincide. See also Kets and Voorneveld (2008).

References

  • Ambrus, A.: Coalitional rationalizability. Q. J. Econ. 121, 903–929 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrus, A.: Theories of coalitional rationality. J. Econ. Theory 144, 676–695 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R.J.: Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In: Tucker, A.W., Luce, R.D. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, pp. 287–324. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K., Weibull, J.W.: Strategy subsets closed under rational behavior. Econ. Lett. 36, 141–146 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D., Peleg, B., Whinston, M.D.: Coalition-proof Nash equilibria: I. concepts. J. Econ. Theory 42, 1–12 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herings, P.J.J., Mauleon, A., Vannetelbosch, V.: Rationalizability for social environments. Games Econ. Behav. 49, 135–156 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurkens, S.: Learning by forgetful players. Games Econ. Behav. 11, 304–329 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalai, E., Samet, D.: Persistent equilibria in strategic games. Int. J. Game Theory 14, 41–50 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kets, W., Voorneveld, M.: Learning to be prepared. Int. J. Game Theory 37, 333–352 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., Yang, C.: Bayesian coalitional rationlizability. J. Econ. Theory 144, 248–263 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorneveld, M.: Preparation. Games Econ. Behav. 48, 403–414 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorneveld, M.: Persistent retracts and preparation. Games Econ. Behav. 51, 228–232 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor, an anonymous referee, Jean-François Mertens, Olivier Tercieux and Jorgen Weibull for useful comments and suggestions. Ana Mauleon and Vincent Vannetelbosch are Senior Research Associates of the National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), Belgium. Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competition under the project ECO2012-35820 and from the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS research grant J.007315 are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Vannetelbosch.

Appendix

Appendix

We now show that the existence of minimal strong curb sets holds in general. Let \(\mathcal {G}\) be the class of normal-form games \(G=\left\langle N,\left\{ A_{i}\right\} _{i\in N},\left\{ u_{i}\right\} _{i\in N}\right\rangle \) where for each player \(i\in N=\left\{ 1,2,\ldots ,n\right\} \), \(A_{i}\) is a compact subset of a metric space and \(u_{i}:\) \( A\rightarrow \mathbb {R} \) is a continuous von Neumann–Morgenstern utility function. Payoffs are extended to mixed strategies in the usual way. Let \(\Delta (A_{i})\) be the set of Borel probability measures over \(A_{i}\). If \(B_{i}\subseteq A_{i}\) is a Borel set, then \(\Delta (B_{i})\) denotes the set of Borel probability measures with support in \(B_{i}\): \(\Delta (B_{i})=\{\alpha _{i}\in \Delta (A_{i})\mid \alpha _{i}(B_{i})=1\}\). If \(G\in \mathcal {G}\), that is, payoff functions are continuous and strategy sets compact, then each set \(\mathrm{BR} ^{i}(\alpha _{-i})\subseteq A_{i}\) is nonempty and compact. A strong curb set is a product set \(X=\times _{i\in N}X_{i}\) where (a) for each \(i\in N\), \(X_{i}\subseteq A_{i}\) is a nonempty, compact set of pure strategies; (b) \( \forall J\subseteq N,\forall \mathbf {\alpha }=(\alpha _{-1},\ldots ,\alpha _{-n}) \) with \(\alpha _{-i}\in \times _{l\in N{\setminus } \{i\}}\Delta (X_{l}) \), \(i\in N\), \(\mathrm{CBR}^{J}(\mathbf {\alpha })\subseteq \times _{j\in J}X_{j} \).

Theorem 1

Every game \(G\in \mathcal {G}\) has a minimal strong curb set.

Proof

Let Q be the collection of all strong curb sets of G. A is a strong curb set of G since for every \(J\subseteq N\) and \( \mathbf {\alpha }=(\alpha _{-1},\ldots ,\alpha _{-N})\) with \(\alpha _{-i}\in \times _{l\in N{\setminus } \{i\}}\Delta (A_{l})\), \(i\in N\), we have \(\mathrm{CBR} ^{J}(\mathbf {\alpha })\subseteq \times _{j\in J}A_{j}\). So Q is nonempty and partially ordered via set inclusion. According to the Hausdorff Maximality Principle, Q contains a maximal nested subset R. For each \( i\in N\), let \(X_{i}=\cap _{Y\in R}Y_{i}\) be the intersection of player i’s strategies in the nested set R. The set \(X_{i}\) is nonempty since the conditions of the Cantor intersection principle are satisfied, i.e., (i) the collection \(\{Y_{i}\mid Y\in R\}\) is nested and thus satisfies the finite intersection property and (ii) each \(Y_{i}\) is nonempty and compact. It remains to prove that \(X=\times _{i\in N}X_{i}\) is a minimal strong curb set. Take \(\mathbf {\alpha }=(\alpha _{-1},\ldots ,\alpha _{-N})\) with \(\alpha _{-i}\in \times _{l\in N{\setminus } \{i\}}\Delta (X_{l})\), \(i\in N\). We have that \(\mathrm{CBR}^{J}(\mathbf {\alpha })\cap \times _{j\in J}(A_{j}\backslash X_{j})=\emptyset \) for \(J\subseteq N\) since \(\mathrm{CBR}^{J}(\mathbf {\alpha } )\cap \times _{j\in J}(A_{j}\backslash X_{j})=\mathrm{CBR}^{J}(\mathbf {\alpha } )\cap (\times _{j\in J}\cup _{Y\in R}(A_{j}\backslash Y_{j}))\subseteq \mathrm{ CBR}^{J}(\mathbf {\alpha })\cap (\cup _{Y\in R}\times _{j\in J}(A_{j}\backslash Y_{j}))=\cup _{Y\in R}(\mathrm{CBR}^{J}(\mathbf {\alpha } )\cap \times _{j\in J}(A_{j}\backslash Y_{j}))\) and \(\mathrm{CBR}^{J}(\mathbf { \alpha })\cap \times _{j\in J}(A_{j}\backslash Y_{j})=\emptyset \) for all \( Y\in R\) (Y is a strong curb set). This establishes that X is a strong curb set. The fact that it is minimal follows directly from the fact that R is a maximal nested subset of Q. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grandjean, G., Mauleon, A. & Vannetelbosch, V. Strongly rational sets for normal-form games. Econ Theory Bull 5, 35–46 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-016-0095-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-016-0095-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation