Skip to main content
Log in

Sonoelastography findings of supraspinatus tendon in rotator cuff tendinopathy without tear: comparison with magnetic resonance images and conventional ultrasonography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

Sonoelastography (SE) is a new technique that can assess differences in tissue stiffness. This study investigated the performance of SE for the differentiation of supraspinatus (SSP) tendon alterations of tendinopathy compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional ultrasonography (US).

Methods

One hundred and eighteen consecutively registered patients with symptoms and MRI findings of SSP tendinopathy were assessed with US and SE. Coronal images of the SSP tendon were obtained using US and SE. Increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images in the coronal planes were graded according to the extent of the signal changes from ventral to dorsal. SE images were evaluated by reviewers using an experimentally proven color grading system.

Results

Using SE, 7.6 % of the SSP tendons were categorized as grade 0, 30.5 % as grade 1, 19.5 % as grade 2, and 42.4 % as grade 3. Evaluation of the interobserver reliability of the SE findings showed “almost perfect agreement”, with a weighted kappa coefficient of 0.83. By comparing the MRI findings with the SE findings, grades of MRI and SE had a positive correlation (r = 0.829, p = <0.001). Furthermore, grades of US and SE also had a positive correlation (r = 0.723, p = <0.001).

Conclusions

SE is valuable in the detection of the intratendinous and peritendinous alterations of the SSP tendon and has excellent interobserver reliability and excellent correlation with MRI findings and conventional ultrasonography findings.

Riassunto

Obiettivi

La sonoelastografia (SE) è una nuova tecnica in grado di valutare le differenze di rigidità dei tessuti. Questo studio ha valutato le capacità della SE nella differenziazione delle alterazioni tendinee da tendinopatia del sovraspinato (SSP) rispetto a risonanza magnetica (MRI) ed ecografia convenzionale (US).

Materiali e Metodi

Centoventuno pazienti con sintomi e reperti MRI di tendinopatia del SSP sono stati valutati con US e SE. Si sono realizzate immagini coronali del tendine SSP utilizzando US e SE. Sono state valutate immagini T2-pesate, per la maggiore intensità del segnale, nei piani coronali, da ventrale a dorsale. Immagini di SE sono state valutate da revisori che utilizzavano un sistema di grading di colore sperimentale.

Risultati

Utilizzando la SE, 7,4 % dei tendini SSP sono stati classificati come di grado 0, 29,8 % di grado 1, 19,8 % di grado 2, e 43,0 % di grado 3. La valutazione inter-osservatori dei risultati SE ha mostrato “accordo quasi perfetto”, con un coefficiente kappa pesato di 0,83. Confrontando i risultati della risonanza magnetica con i risultati della SE, risonanza magnetica e SE hanno avuto una correlazione positiva (r = 0,849, p = < 0.001). Inoltre, anche US e SE hanno avuto una correlazione positiva (r = 0,706, p = < 0,001).

Conclusioni

La SE è valida nella rilevazione delle alterazioni intra-tendinee e peri-tendinee del tendine SSP e ha un’ottima affidabilità inter-osservatori e un’eccellente correlazione con RM e reperti di ecografia convenzionale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chard MD, Hazleman R, Hazleman BL, King RH, Reiss BB (1991) Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum 34:766–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vecchio P, Kavanagh R, Hazleman BL, King RH (1995) Shoulder pain in a community-based rheumatology clinic. Br J Rheumatol 34:440–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iannotti JP (1994) Full-thickness rotator cuff tears: factors affecting surgical outcome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:87–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Milgrom C, Schaffler M, Gilbert S, van Holsbeeck M (1995) Rotator-cuff changes in asymptomatic adults. The effect of age, hand dominance and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:296–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neer CS, 2nd (1983) Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:70–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Almekinders LC (1998) Tendinitis and other chronic tendinopathies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6:157–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fredberg U, Stengaard-Pedersen K (2008) Chronic tendinopathy tissue pathology, pain mechanisms, and etiology with a special focus on inflammation. Scand J Med Sci Sports 18:3–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A, Murphy BJ, Zlatkin MB (1995) Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:10–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miniaci A, Mascia AT, Salonen DC, Becker EJ (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder in asymptomatic professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med 30:66–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Worland RL, Lee D, Orozco CG, SozaRex F, Keenan J (2003) Correlation of age, acromial morphology, and rotator cuff tear pathology diagnosed by ultrasound in asymptomatic patients. J South Orthop Assoc 12:23–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Connor PM, Banks DM, Tyson AB, Coumas JS, D’Alessandro DF (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the asymptomatic shoulder of overhead athletes: a 5-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 31:724–727

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Varghese T, Ophir J, Konofagou E, Kallel F, Righetti R (2001) Tradeoffs in elastographic imaging. Ultrason Imaging 23:216–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13:111–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pesavento A, Perrey C, Krueger M, Ermert H (1999) A time-efficient and accurate strain estimation concept for ultrasonic elastography using iterative phase zero estimation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 46:1057–1067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T et al (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frey H (2003) Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity. Radiologe 43:850–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, Spratt SR, Zuurbier RA, Magnant CM et al (1997) Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 202:79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, Mai JJ et al (2005) Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology 237:202–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P, Horninger W, Aigner F, Bartsch G et al (2007) Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. Eur Radiol 17:2278–2285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, Hiraoka M et al (2007) Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography–initial experience. Radiology 243:258–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kjellin I, Ho CP, Cervilla V, Haghighi P, Kerr R, Vangness CT et al (1991) Alterations in the supraspinatus tendon at MR imaging: correlation with histopathologic findings in cadavers. Radiology 181:837–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zanetti M, Hodler J (2000) Imaging of degenerative and posttraumatic disease in the shoulder joint with ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 35:119–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Zordo T, Lill SR, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Jaschke W, Bellmann-Weiler R et al (2009) Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:180–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alfredson H (2005) Conservative management of Achilles tendinopathy: new ideas. Foot Ankle Clin 10:321–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alfredson H (2003) Chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy: an update on research and treatment. Clin Sports Med 22:727–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Andres BM, Murrell GA (2008) Molecular and clinical developments in tendinopathy: editorial comment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1519–1520

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Seitz AL, McClure PW, Finucane S, Boardman ND 3rd, Michener LA (2011) Mechanisms of rotator cuff tendinopathy: intrinsic, extrinsic, or both? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 26:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bouffard JA, Lee SM, Dhanju J (2000) Ultrasonography of the shoulder. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21:164–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sein ML, Walton J, Linklater J, Harris C, Dugal T, Appleyard R et al (2007) Reliability of MRI assessment of supraspinatus tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med 41:e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Godefroy D, Sarazin L, Rousselin B, Dupont AM, Drape J, Chevrot A (2001) Shoulder imaging: what is the best modality? J Radiol 82:317–332 quiz 33–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Khan KM, Forster BB, Robinson J, Cheong Y, Louis L, Maclean L et al (2003) Are ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of value in assessment of Achilles tendon disorders? A two year prospective study. Br J Sports Med 37:149–153

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Parameswaran K, Willems-Widyastuti A, Alagappan VK, Radford K, Kranenburg AR, Sharma HS (2006) Role of extracellular matrix and its regulators in human airway smooth muscle biology. Cell Biochem Biophys 44:139–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Khoury V, Cardinal E (2009) “Tenomalacia”: a new sonographic sign of tendinopathy? Eur Radiol 19:144–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. De Zordo T, Chhem R, Smekal V, Feuchtner G, Reindl M, Fink C et al (2010) Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Med 31:394–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ (2012) Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol 85:1435–1445

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors (Joong-Bae Seo, Jae-Sung Yoo, and Jee-Won Ryu) have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). All patients provided written informed consent to enrolment in the study and to the inclusion in this article of information that could potentially lead to their identification.

Human and animal studies

The study conducted in accordance with all institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Sung Yoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, JB., Yoo, JS. & Ryu, JW. Sonoelastography findings of supraspinatus tendon in rotator cuff tendinopathy without tear: comparison with magnetic resonance images and conventional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound 18, 143–149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0148-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0148-8

Keywords

Navigation