Abstract
Purpose of Review
With the expanded roll-out of antiretrovirals for treatment and prevention of HIV during the last decade, the emergence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) has become a growing challenge. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology and trajectory of HIVDR globally with an emphasis on pediatric and adolescent populations.
Recent Findings
HIVDR is associated with suboptimal virologic suppression and treatment failure, leading to an increased risk of HIV transmission to uninfected people and increased morbidity and mortality among people living with HIV. High rates of HIVDR to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors globally are expected to decline with the introduction of the integrase strand transfer inhibitors and long-acting combination regimens, while challenge remains for HIVDR to other classes of antiretroviral drugs.
Summary
We highlight several solutions including increased HIV viral load monitoring, expanded HIVDR surveillance, and adopting antiretroviral regimens with a high-resistance barrier to decrease HIVDR. Implementation studies and programmatic changes are needed to determine the best approach to prevent and combat the development of HIVDR.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Since the first cases of HIV were reported in 1981, an estimated 32.7 million people have died from AIDS-related illnesses and 75.7 million people have become infected with HIV globally [1].With the advances and scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART), there has been a significant decline in global mortality and improvement of life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLHIV) [2, 3]. Despite this progress, major gaps persist in the prevention and identification of HIV infection, access to care and treatment, and retention in care [4]. In 2019, out of approximately 38 million people estimated to be living with HIV, 81% were aware of their HIV diagnosis, 67% were receiving ART, and 59% achieved virologic suppression [1]. Work remains in order to achieve the goals set by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS) to eliminate AIDS as a public health threat by 2030, diagnose 95% of all PLHIV, provide treatment to 95% of those diagnosed, and ensure that 95% of PLHIV on treatment achieve sustained virologic suppression [5].
The introduction of new efficacious and better tolerated antiretroviral drugs (ARV) and ART regimens has been vital in controlling the HIV epidemic [6, 7]. Furthermore, major advances have been made in HIV testing, care, and treatment paradigms [8,9,10]. ART eligibility was expanded from initial guidance for immunologically suppressed patients with CD4 counts <200 cells/mm3, to PLHIV with a CD4 count ≤500 cells/mm3 plus other high-risk groups in 2013, and subsequently to all PLHIV regardless of CD4 count in 2015 [11, 12]. Prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) achieved a dramatic reduction of perinatal HIV transmission and infant morbidity and mortality globally, with new HIV infections among children having declined by 52%, from ~310,000 in 2010 to 150,000 in 2019 [1, 13,14,15]. The PMTCT paradigm has also contributed to viewing “treatment as prevention” and the introduction of the concept of “undetectable=untransmittable” (U=U) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with ARVs among uninfected people at risk for acquiring HIV [12, 16, 17].
The “test and treat” strategy of universal voluntary HIV testing and immediate ART initiation was shown by mathematical modeling to significantly reduce new HIV infections [18], and has been recommended by WHO and most national HIV treatment guidelines for all PLHIV since 2016 [12]. In recent years, randomized population-based trials in sub-Saharan Africa, the center of the global HIV epidemic, have demonstrated that this approach resulted in >90% of PLHIV being aware of their diagnosis, 88–97% of those diagnosed with HIV received ART, and ≥87% of PLHIV receiving ART achieved virologic suppression [9, 19,20,21,22]. In 2019, 68% of adult PLHIV had access to ART, while 53% of children living with HIV aged 0–14 years had access to ART [1].
Despite growing ART coverage among PLHIV, virologic suppression is not uniform across diverse regions and populations [9]. The prevalence of virologic suppression in PLHIV who received ART in 2018 was reported to range from 59 to >95% in Asia and the Pacific, 47 to 83% in Western and Central Africa, 73 to >95% in Eastern and Southern Africa, and 80 to >95% in Western and Central Europe and North America [23]. Compared to adults, children living with HIV have significantly lower rates of virologic suppression, especially infants and young children aged <2 years, and those treated with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based ART regimens [24, 25••, 26]. Virologic suppression rates are also lower among adolescents [27,28,29,30,31], women [32,33,34], homeless people [35,36,37], injection drug users [38, 39], and substance users [37, 40].
HIV drug resistance (HIVDR), in addition to prompt linkage to care, ART adherence, early initiation of effective ART that is well tolerated, and accounts for food and drug interactions, is one of the key factors associated with achieving and sustaining virologic suppression among PLHIV [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. HIVDR negatively affects the effectiveness of ART and decreases rates of virologic suppression, leading to treatment failure, immunologic decline, and increased HIV morbidity and mortality. HIVDR to certain ARV classes, such as NNRTIs [49••, 50••], recommended as the first-line ART and PMTCT regimen in low- and middle-income countries through 2018 [51], posed a considerable challenge to achieving the last two of the 95-95-95 global targets and preventing the spread of HIV.
Suboptimal adherence to ART has long been identified as a major contributor to the development of HIVDR among PLHIV [47, 48], and is considered a potential risk for developing HIVDR among PrEP users who become diagnosed with HIV [52]. In resource-limited settings facing the highest burden of the HIV epidemic, challenges with procurement of ARVs and suboptimal HIV services are two other major contributors to the development of HIVDR among PLHIV [53, 54]. Suboptimal access to, and long turnaround times for HIV viral load (VL) and HIVDR testing, and the limited capacity to translate those results into clinical practice also remain challenging in resource-limited settings [54, 55]. Major barriers to suboptimal access to HIVDR testing include its high cost and the need for complex laboratory infrastructure which are often unavailable in resource-limited settings [54]. Moreover, the cascade of HIV care and treatment remains vulnerable to the global economic and health challenges such as the ongoing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Current estimates of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care of PLHIV suggest that disruptions to provision of HIV services and shortages of ARVs may lead to an almost doubling of HIV-related deaths and mother-to-child transmission of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa alone [56]. The development of HIVDR is another serious consequence to consider in the settings of potential shortages in ARVs and disruptions in HIV care.
In recent years, the impact of HIVDR on treatment outcomes, particularly among pediatric and adolescent populations [24, 25••, 26, 57], men who have sex with men (MSM) [58], and injection drug users [59], has become a growing concern. Alarming rates of HIVDR to NNRTIs have been reported in association with expanded access to ART, PMTCT, and prolonged use of failing ART regimens in patients without virologic suppression [24, 46, 50••, 60]. The introduction and scale-up of highly efficacious integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) that have a high barrier to resistance [41, 61, 62] as the preferred first- and second-line ARVs [51, 63,64,65,66,67] has brought new hope that the scope of HIVDR may be reduced in the future. The recent (2020) approval of dolutegravir (DTG) for use in infants and young children by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has positioned this INSTI as the preferred ARV for these vulnerable populations as well [68]. At the same time, the scale-up of PrEP and anticipated introduction of long-acting ARVs into clinical practice globally has generated questions about their impact on HIVDR in the coming years. This review will discuss the evolution and epidemiology of HIVDR globally with a special emphasis on pediatric populations and current data on HIVDR among novel ARVs.
Overview of the Global HIV Drug Resistance Landscape
The use of HIVDR testing in resource-limited settings requires authorization and is limited to PLHIV who are consistently failing ART, whereas HIVDR testing is performed routinely in PLHIV initiating and failing ART in resource-rich settings [69]. The prevalence of HIVDR globally is studied through surveillance mainly for nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and NNRTIs, and increasingly for protease inhibitors (PIs) and INSTIs. The focus on HIVDR surveillance on NRTIs and NNRTIs is logical, given that they comprised first-line ART regimens until recently, require fewer genetic mutations to reduce viral susceptibility, and have a lower genetic barrier to resistance compared with PIs and INSTIs [69]. There is essentially no cross-resistance between drug classes (e.g., resistance to NRTIs does not translate into resistance to NNRTIs, PIs, or INSTIs), but there is significant cross-resistance within certain drug classes, because most HIVDR mutations reduce the susceptibility to multiple ARVs of the same class [69].
HIVDR is typically divided into three main categories: acquired HIV drug resistance (ADR), transmitted HIV drug resistance (TDR), and pretreatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) [49••]. ADR develops when HIV mutations emerge in individuals receiving ART, often secondary to poor adherence or treatment interruption. TDR is detected in individuals with no history of previous ARV exposure (i.e., treatment-naïve) and occurs when individuals are infected with virus that has HIVDR mutations. PDR is detected either in treatment-naïve individuals or in individuals with prior ARV exposure (i.e., treatment-experienced) who are initiating ART. PDR can be either transmitted or acquired drug resistance, or both [49••]. The prevalence of ADR, TDR, and PDR differ between resource-rich and resource-limited settings due to the differences in factors affecting development of HIVDR outlined in Table 1.
ARV, antiretroviral; ART, antiretroviral therapy; HIVDR, HIV drug resistance; INSTI, integrase strand transfer inhibitor; PMTCT, prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; VL, viral load
HIV Drug Resistance in Resource-Rich Settings
PLHIV in resource-rich settings have wider and more ample access and experience with diverse ARVs and, therefore, have had historically higher rates of HIVDR. In a large study of almost 85,000 samples from treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced adult PLHIV in the USA during 2012–2018, 33% of samples demonstrated reduced susceptibility to at least one ARV [70]. NNRTI resistance was common (~75% of samples with any resistance) and PI and INSTI resistance were significantly less common (8% and 17%, respectively) in 2018 [70]. During 2015–2016, a French study reported prevalence rates of TDR in treatment-naïve PLHIV, with PI and INSTI resistance of 11% and 9%, respectively [71]. In contrast, 2013 data from the UK reported low rates of TDRs at 6.6%, including PI resistance at 1.7%, and no major INSTI resistance among treatment-naïve PLHIV [36].
More concerning are the data on the increasing prevalence of INSTI TDRs in an urban US setting within a cohort in Washington, DC, USA, during 2004–2013 (0.0 to 1.4%, p=0.04) [72]. While the overall INSTI ADRs remained low at 1.8% in this US study in 2013 [72], 40% of INSTI-experienced patients in a recent study (2008–2017) from Italy were reported to have at least one major INSTI resistance mutation, with a preponderance of INSTI resistance among patients with higher HIV VL [73]. These data suggest that despite the high resistance threshold of INSTIs, with the increasing use of these ARVs globally, INSTI-experienced patients will need to be monitored closely for the INSTI HIVDR.
Reassuringly, the rate of multiclass ADR in heavily treatment-experienced PLHIV in resource-rich settings has decreased over the past decade, with a prevalence of three-class (NRTI, NNRTI, PI) resistance at only 6.7% and four-class (NRTI, NNRTI, PI, INSTI) resistance at <2% in 2014 [74]. Despite relatively low rates of three- or four-class ADR, heavily treatment-experienced PLHIV remain a vulnerable cohort of patients with an urgent need for novel ARV agents.
HIV Drug Resistance in Resource-Limited Settings
Data from resource-limited settings suggest high rates of PDR and TDR to NRTIs and NNRTIs. Surveillance by the WHO during 2014–2018 reported that 12 out of 18 low- and middle-income countries (5 from sub-Saharan Africa, 5 from the Americas, 2 from Western Pacific) had NNRTI PDR >10% [49••]. A 2016 systematic review and meta-regression analysis of 56,044 adult PLHIV from 63 low- and middle-income countries found NNRTI PDR prevalence to be between 7.2 and 11.0% [60]. It was estimated that the increase in prevalence of PDR between 2015 and 2016 was higher in southern Africa (1.8%) compared to Asia (0.3%) [60].
Unfortunately, the rates of ADR in resource-limited settings have generally increased over time. Surveillance of ADR in 9 low- and middle-income countries by the WHO during 2014–2018 identified a prevalence of NNRTI PDR ranging from 50% in Eswatini to 97% in Uganda among PLHIV receiving ART for ~12 months. Among PLHIV receiving ART for ≥48 months, most of the surveyed countries had higher rates of NNRTI, NRTI, and dual-class NNRTI and NRTI ADR [49••]. Similarly, in a systematic review of seven studies in resource-limited settings, the majority of which were in sub-Saharan Africa, overall ADR was detected in 7.2% of patients on ART for 6–11 months, compared to 20.7% of patients on ART for ≥36 months [75]. The development of multi-class drug resistance also increased over time (3.7% and 21.6% at 6–11 months and ≥36 months, respectively) [75]. Not surprisingly, the extent of ADR is most pronounced in PLHIV experiencing virologic failure. Among 171 treatment-experienced PLHIV with virologic failure in Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Nigeria during 2013–2019, ADR were observed for NNRTIs in 82.5%, for NRTIs in 66.7%, and for PIs in 1.8% of participants, respectively [76]. These data collectively highlight the importance of routine VL monitoring for early identification and management of virologic failure in the context of developing ADR.
HIV Drug Resistance in Pregnant Women, Children, and Adolescents
High rates of NNRTI HIVDR are reported among women in resource-limited settings and contribute to the significant rise in TDR among infants and young children living with HIV. A South African study (2011–2012) detected NNRTI HIVDR in more than half (65%) of pregnant women living with HIV [77], and a study of a large cohort of mother-infant pairs from South Africa, Brazil, and Argentina showed that women with detectable viremia were more likely than women with virologic suppression to transmit HIVDR to their infants [78], emphasizing the importance of optimizing ART regimens and maintaining virologic suppression throughout pregnancy.
Children with perinatal HIV can acquire HIVDR from their mother (TDR), ARV exposure through PMTCT (PDR and ADR), and failure to sustain virologic suppression on ART (ADR). In two European studies (1993–2017), the prevalence of NRTI, NNRTI, and PI TDR was reported at 3.6–14.6%, 17.9–26%, and 0–10.4%, respectively, among children living with HIV [79, 80]. Rates of overall HIVDR in children living with HIV in resource-limited settings during 2004–2015 have been reported at 13–40%, and as high as 34–79% in those children with prior exposure to ARVs through PMTCT [24, 81,82,83,84]. A 2016 meta-analysis that included data from 19 studies with a total of 2617 children living with HIV aged ≤12 years from 13 countries in sub-Saharan Africa found a high prevalence of PDR at 42.7% among children exposed to ART through PMTCT compared to 12.7% among children without PMTCT ART exposure: NNRTI mutations were found in 32.4% and 9.7% of these children, respectively [24]. PDR to PIs in infants and young children with perinatal HIV has also been reported, albeit at low prevalence rates <3% with the exception of one European study (Spain, 1993–2016) described above (10.4%) [24, 79, 80, 82, 83]. To our knowledge, INSTI TDR in infants or young children with newly diagnosed perinatal HIV have not been reported in resource-limited settings to date.
The rates of HIVDR in children living with HIV and adolescents with perinatal HIV are generally high in both resource-rich and resource-limited settings, likely due to a combination of prolonged ART exposure and ART adherence challenges. Within a cohort of 234 children and adolescents with perinatal HIV infection in the USA (2007–2009), 61% had resistance to at least 1 NRTI, 45% to at least 1 NNRTI, and 34% to at least 1 PI, and 18% had resistance in all 3 classes [57]. In comparison, a study of 47 predominantly treatment-experienced children and adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa reported a prevalence of 87.2% with ≥1 NRTI resistance mutations, 65.9% with ≥1 NNRTI resistance mutations, and 63.8% with ≥3 PI resistance mutations [85]. Adolescents with recently diagnosed horizontally acquired HIV in the USA (2003–2005) were reported to have a high prevalence of HIVDR (18%), particularly to NNRTIs (15%) [86], suggesting that the duration of ART exposure does not necessarily correlate with the absence of HIVDR.
Evolution of HIV Drug Resistance
HIVDR evolves naturally when confronted by suboptimal pharmacokinetic exposure with selective pressures by diverse ARVs. Over the years of the HIV epidemic, HIVDR has been affected by changes in ART and PMTCT approaches, and the introduction of novel ARVs. For example, the evolution in the management of PMTCT from short course zidovudine to single dose nevirapine to “Option B+” with lifelong triple maternal ART throughout pregnancy and through breastfeeding have affected the trajectory of NRTI and NNRTI HIVDR among women and young children in resource-limited settings. Along with a significant reduction in perinatal HIV transmission, several studies from sub-Saharan Africa have shown a higher prevalence of NNRTI drug resistance in infants with perinatal HIV exposed to PMTCT compared to infants without PMTCT exposure [24, 82, 84, 87]. The high prevalence of NNRTI HIVDR resistance with PMTCT exposure and lower rates of virologic suppression in young children along with other considerations have accelerated first-line ART recommendations by the WHO for replacing NNRTIs with INSTIs in adults, including pregnant women living with HIV, and with PIs and INSTIs for newly diagnosed infants with perinatal HIV [51].
INSTIs have also replaced the second-line PIs among PLHIV failing non-INSTI-based ART based on better tolerability, higher resistance threshold, lower cost, and potential for higher adherence [51]. Recent data suggest that regimens combining the INSTI, DTG, and with one or two NRTIs are capable of overcoming pre-existing NRTI resistance in treatment-experienced patients with virologic failure [88,89,90]. The most potent and currently preferred first- and second-line ART and INSTIs (DTG and bictegravir (BIC)) have a high-resistance barrier, but are not fully protected from HIVDR. An Italian study of 462 INSTI-experienced PLHIV detected low-level resistance to any INSTI in 42.9% of cases, and intermediate-level resistance to DTG in 15% of cases, supporting INSTI genotype testing in INSTI-experienced patients and encouraging continued support of adherence to INSTI-based ART regimens [73]. In this study, previous exposure to DTG, and not to first generation INSTIs (raltegravir (RAL) or elvitegravir (EVG)), were associated with a decreased susceptibility to DTG, confirming its higher genetic barrier and lack of cross-resistance within this drug class. In a larger Canadian study of 1379 PLHIV receiving INSTI-based regimens with RAL, EVG, or DTG, INSTI resistance was reported in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced PLHIV, with a trend for DTG having a lower rate of resistance compared with RAL and EVG [91]. Risk factors for emergent INSTI HIVDR were similar to other reports and included low CD4 count (<200 cells/μL) and <80% adherence to ART [91]. Real-world outcomes with HIVDR data for PLHIV on regimens with newer INSTIs such as BIC and cabotegravir (CAB) are sparse or not yet available. However, HIVDR surveillance is important as there is extensive cross-resistance between DTG, BIC, and CAB [92, 93]. With the majority of national and international guidelines now recommending INSTI-based ART regimens as the preferred first- and second-line regimens for PLHIV [51, 63,64,65,66,67], it will be crucial to monitor INSTI HIVDR globally.
The introduction of PrEP and dual ART regimens for prophylaxis and treatment of HIV has generated new questions about their impact on HIVDR. Currently, HIVDR has been rarely reported among PrEP users who became infected with HIV [16, 94]. HIVDR have been reported in cases when PrEP was initiated during acute HIV infection, or with suboptimal PrEP adherence. PrEP-related HIVDR has the potential to affect the selection of first-line ART regimen initiated by PrEP users who acquire HIV. It also poses a risk to the treatment of hepatitis B in those patients who acquire the infection while on PrEP. Recent preliminary data has shown that the long-acting injectable INSTI, CAB, is a safe and efficacious PrEP agent [95], reducing the challenge of medication adherence for people who have challenges with taking daily PrEP.
In recent years, ART regimens with two ARVs (3TC plus DTG or darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), DTG plus rilpivirine (RPV), or DTG plus DRV/r) have been introduced into clinical practice following studies that have shown them to be effective in achieving virologic suppression in treatment-naive adults [90, 96, 97] and/or maintaining virologic suppression in treatment-experienced adults [98,99,100,101,102,103], with no evidence of the emergence of HIVDR mutations to either of the ARVs used. Studies have shown that dual ART regimens are non-inferior to standard triple ARV regimens, and provide the opportunity to reduce adverse effects of ARVs and simplify ART regimens [90, 97,98,99,100, 104, 105]. Currently recommended dual ART regimens are either INSTI-based, PI-based, or a combination of an INSTI with a boosted PI [63, 106]. Studies in treatment-naive PLHIV receiving dual ART with DTG plus 3TC or 3TC plus DRV/r did not demonstrate any resistance mutation selection at virologic failure [90, 96]. Among 556 virologic suppressed PLHIV who switched from a triple or dual regimen (3TC plus boosted PI) to dual ART with DTG and 3TC, 12 patients experienced virologic failure. However, none developed resistance mutations to DTG or 3TC [98]. PLHIV receiving dual ART with RAL plus DRV/r had a high rate (29.5%) of INSTI resistance at virologic failure [97]. Conversely, resistance mutations were rare in studies combining 2nd generation INSTIs, DTG, or long-acting CAB, with RPV [99, 100]. Dual ART regimens are promising treatment options for PLHIV who do not have pre-existing mutations to either ARVs with a low likelihood for development of HIVDR, with adequate ART adherence. HIVDR surveillance will allow a better understanding of the emergence of HIVDR in PLHIV receiving standard-of-care dual ART regimens.
Novel Approaches to Combat HIV Drug Resistance
Numerous novel therapeutic approaches to HIV treatment are undergoing studies, including the use of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs), long-acting ARVs, and ARVs from new drug classes. These novel approaches are vital in expanding HIV prevention and treatment options, particularly for PLHIV with multi-drug-resistant HIV infection. Long-acting oral or injectable ARVs are also beneficial in overcoming the need for daily medication usage, which can ultimately lead to improved medication adherence and lower HIVDR. A full review of these novel approaches is beyond the scope of this review; however, select agents will be described in brief below.
Several novel ARVs recently approved by the FDA for use in adults include fostemsavir (FTR), ibalizumab (IBA), and doravirine (DOR). FTR, a prodrug of temsavir, is an attachment inhibitor that prevents HIV entry into the CD4 T-cell and is approved for heavily treatment-experienced adults with multi-drug-resistant HIV. FTR-related mutations have been reported at a high rate (48%) in PLHIV receiving FTR as functional monotherapy or with only one or two fully active ARVs through week 96 [107]. Regardless of this limitation, the efficacy and tolerability data support the use of FTR as a salvage treatment option in patients with multi-drug-resistant HIV. IBA is a novel monoclonal antibody administered every 4 weeks as an intravenous infusion. Despite IBA resistance observed to occur in PLHIV receiving IBA as monotherapy [108], antibodies to IBA have rarely been observed in clinical trials with IBA [109, 110]. Additionally, IBA has no reported cross-resistance with other ARVs [111] and even has synergistic in vitro effects with the fusion inhibitor, enfurvitide (T-20) [112], making it a promising agent for the treatment of multi-drug-resistant HIV. Lastly, DOR is a novel NNRTI with a higher genetic barrier to resistance compared to first-generation NNRTIs, nevirapine and efavirenz, and the second-generation NNRTI, RPV [113]. PLHIV who previously failed a first- or second-generation NNRTI-based ART regimen had a high-level DOR resistance rate of 6–35% [114, 115].
DOR is currently being investigated for use in combination with islatravir (ISL), a long-acting first in-class nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor with multiple mechanisms of antiviral action. ISL in combination with DOR has demonstrated high potency and good tolerability at week 96 with no viral resistance identified [116]. A number of other novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of HIV are under investigation. While initial safety and tolerability studies have been successful, treatment with bNAbs is accompanied with its own set of challenges including inadequate or transient responses in patients with resistant viruses at baseline, and emergence of resistant bNAbs HIV mutations [117, 118]. Clinical trials are in progress for newer generations of bNAbs for treatment and prevention of HIV. Another novel agent under investigation is lenacapavir (LEN), which is a subcutaneous long-acting HIV-1 capsid inhibitor that is being developed in combination with other ARVs, and is capable of producing sustained therapeutic concentrations for at least 6 months after a single dose [119]. Resistance to lenacapavir in a phase 1b trial was shown to be rare, with no cross-resistance against the commonly used ARVs (NRTI, NNRTI, PI, and INSTI) [120]. Among 29 PLHIV who received monotherapy with LEN, a single mutation emerged in 2 participants who received LEN at doses several-fold lower than used in phase 2 trials [120]. Overall, these novel and investigational therapeutic approaches highlight the ongoing quest for HIV treatment options with higher acceptability, tolerability, and resistance barrier.
Conclusion
The evolution of ART regimens has contributed to the trajectory of HIVDR and solutions to address this therapeutic challenge. Despite significant progress in the introduction of novel, more potent, and better tolerated ARVs and ART regimens, HIVDR remains a significant challenge globally, particularly in some regions within resource-limited settings where HIV policies and programmatic and health care gaps limit HIVDR surveillance, prevention, and handling of virologic failure and HIVDR. The need for routine HIVDR surveillance and VL monitoring is significant and necessary to inform on future recommendations of first-line ART regimens. Point-of-care diagnostics have the potential improve the management of PLHIV with HIVDR at the time of initiating ART or at the time of failure. Implementation studies and programmatic changes are needed to determine the best approach to disseminating these services and increase health system capacity in order to combat the development of HIVDR. Novel therapeutic agents bring solutions to the challenge of virologic failure and HIVDR, but do not eliminate the need for the prevention, monitoring, and management HIVDR in order to achieve the elimination of AIDS and control of HIV epidemic globally.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Global HIV and AIDS statistics - 2020 Fact Sheet. 2020; https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf. Accessed 8/19/2020.
Wandeler G, Johnson LF, Egger M. Trends in life expectancy of HIV-positive adults on antiretroviral therapy across the globe: comparisons with general population. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016;11(5):492–500.
GBD 2017 HIV collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and mortality of HIV, 1980-2017, and forecasts to 2030, for 195 countries and territories: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2017. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(12):e831-e859.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Global AIDS Update 2020; https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2020_global-aids-report_en.pdf. Accessed 10/25/2020.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Fast track: ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030. 2014; https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/JC2686_WAD2014report_en.pdf. Accessed 8/18/2020.
Moore RD, Bartlett JG. Dramatic decline in the HIV-1 RNA level over calendar time in a large urban HIV practice. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(6):600–4.
Tseng A, Seet J, Phillips EJ. The evolution of three decades of antiretroviral therapy: challenges, triumphs and the promise of the future. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;79(2):182–94.
Parekh BS, Ou CY, Fonjungo PN, et al. Diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(1).
Havlir D, Lockman S, Ayles H, Larmarange J, Chamie G, Gaolathe T, et al. What do the Universal Test and Treat trials tell us about the path to HIV epidemic control? J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(2):e25455.
Kay ES, Batey DS, Mugavero MJ. The HIV treatment cascade and care continuum: updates, goals, and recommendations for the future. AIDS Res Ther. 2016;13:35.
World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection. 2013; https://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/arv2013/download/en/. Accessed 8/20/2020.
World Health Organization. Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. 2015; https://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/earlyrelease-arv/en/. Accessed 08/20/2020.
Gupta S, Kabami J, Chamie G, et al. Population-level HIV-free infant survival in the SEARCH trial (Abstract 134LB). Paper presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.2020; Boston, USA.
Vrazo AC, Sullivan D, Ryan PB. Eliminating mother-to-child transmission of HIV by 2030: 5 strategies to ensure continued progress. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6(2):249–56.
Tiam A, Gill MM, Machekano R, Tukei V, Mokone M, Viana S, et al. 18-24-month HIV-free survival as measurement of the effectiveness of prevention of mother-to-child transmission in the context of lifelong antiretroviral therapy: results of a community-based survey. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0237409.
Van Epps P, Wilson BM, Garner W, Beste LA, Maier MM, Ohl ME. Brief report: incidence of HIV in a nationwide cohort receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(5):427–30.
U. S. Preventive Services Task Force, Owens DK, Davidson KW, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019;321(22):2203–13.
Granich RM, Gilks CF, Dye C, De Cock KM, Williams BG. Universal voluntary HIV testing with immediate antiretroviral therapy as a strategy for elimination of HIV transmission: a mathematical model. Lancet. 2009;373(9657):48–57.
Havlir DV, Balzer LB, Charlebois ED, Clark TD, Kwarisiima D, Ayieko J, et al. HIV testing and treatment with the use of a community health approach in rural Africa. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(3):219–29.
Hayes RJ, Donnell D, Floyd S, Mandla N, Bwalya J, Sabapathy K, et al. Effect of Universal Testing and treatment on HIV incidence - HPTN 071 (PopART). N Engl J Med. 2019;381(3):207–18.
Iwuji CC, Orne-Gliemann J, Larmarange J, Balestre E, Thiebaut R, Tanser F, et al. Universal test and treat and the HIV epidemic in rural South Africa: a phase 4, open-label, community cluster randomised trial. Lancet HIV. 2018;5(3):e116–25.
Makhema J, Wirth KE, Pretorius Holme M, Gaolathe T, Mmalane M, Kadima E, et al. Universal testing, expanded treatment, and incidence of HIV infection in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(3):230–42.
Marsh K, Eaton JW, Mahy M, Sabin K, Autenrieth CS, Wanyeki I, et al. Global, regional and country-level 90-90-90 estimates for 2018: assessing progress towards the 2020 target. AIDS. 2019;33(Suppl 3):S213–26.
Boerma RS, Sigaloff KC, Akanmu AS, et al. Alarming increase in pretreatment HIV drug resistance in children living in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(2):365–71.
Siberry GK, Amzel A, Ramos A, Rivadeneira ED. Impact of human immunodeficiency virus drug resistance on treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection in children in low- and middle-income countries. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_9):S838–42 This is a comprehensive review of the pretreatment (PDR) and acquired (ADR) HIVDR among infants and children from low- and midle-income countries. The impact of the antiretroviral drug exposures through the prevention of mother-to-child tranmission on the development of HIVDR in children is reviewed. Scale up of the viral load monitoring and introduction of optimal pediatric antiretroviral drugs and formulations are the two highlighted solutions to HIVDR among children.
Ferrand RA, Briggs D, Ferguson J, Penazzato M, Armstrong A, MacPherson P, et al. Viral suppression in adolescents on antiretroviral treatment: review of the literature and critical appraisal of methodological challenges. Tropical Med Int Health. 2016;21(3):325–33.
Kapogiannis BG, Koenig LJ, Xu J, Mayer KH, Loeb J, Greenberg L, et al. The HIV continuum of care for adolescents and young adults attending 13 urban US HIV care centers of the NICHD-ATN-CDC-HRSA SMILE Collaborative. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;84(1):92–100.
Nachega JB, Hislop M, Nguyen H, Dowdy DW, Chaisson RE, Regensberg L, et al. Antiretroviral therapy adherence, virologic and immunologic outcomes in adolescents compared with adults in southern Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51(1):65–71.
UNICEF. HIV and AIDS in adolescents. 2020; https://data.unicef.org/topic/adolescents/hiv-aids/. Accessed 8/24/2020.
Agwu AL, Lee L, Fleishman JA, Voss C, Yehia BR, Althoff KN, et al. Aging and loss to follow-up among youth living with human immunodeficiency virus in the HIV Research Network. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(3):345–51.
Boerma RS, Bunupuradah T, Dow D, Fokam J, Kariminia A, Lehman D, et al. Multicentre analysis of second-line antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected children: adolescents at high risk of failure. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(1):21930.
Saunders P, Goodman AL, Smith CJ, Marshall N, O'Connor JL, Lampe FC, et al. Does gender or mode of HIV acquisition affect virological response to modern antiretroviral therapy (ART)? HIV Med. 2016;17(1):18–27.
Rosin C, Elzi L, Thurnheer C, Fehr J, Cavassini M, Calmy A, et al. Gender inequalities in the response to combination antiretroviral therapy over time: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. HIV Med. 2015;16(5):319–25.
Cescon A, Patterson S, Chan K, Palmer AK, Margolese S, Burchell AN, et al. Gender differences in clinical outcomes among HIV-positive individuals on antiretroviral therapy in Canada: a multisite cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83649.
Aidala AA, Wilson MG, Shubert V, Gogolishvili D, Globerman J, Rueda S, et al. Housing status, medical care, and health outcomes among people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(1):e1–e23.
Tostevin A, White E, Dunn D, Croxford S, Delpech V, Williams I, et al. Recent trends and patterns in HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance in the United Kingdom. HIV Med. 2017;18(3):204–13.
Wohl AR, Benbow N, Tejero J, Johnson C, Scheer S, Brady K, et al. Antiretroviral prescription and viral suppression in a representative sample of HIV-infected persons in care in 4 large metropolitan areas of the United States, Medical Monitoring Project, 2011-2013. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;76(2):158–70.
Harris NS, Johnson AS, Huang YA, et al. Vital signs: status of human immunodeficiency virus testing, viral suppression, and HIV preexposure prophylaxis - United States, 2013-2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(48):1117–23.
Kerr T, Marshall BD, Milloy MJ, et al. Patterns of heroin and cocaine injection and plasma HIV-1 RNA suppression among a long-term cohort of injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;124(1-2):108–12.
Tolson C, Richey LE, Zhao Y, Korte JE, Brady K, Haynes L, et al. Association of substance use with hospitalization and virologic suppression in a southern academic HIV clinic. Am J Med Sci. 2018;355(6):553–8.
Jacobson K, Ogbuagu O. Integrase inhibitor-based regimens result in more rapid virologic suppression rates among treatment-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients compared to non-nucleoside and protease inhibitor-based regimens in a real-world clinical setting: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(43):e13016.
Johns Hopkins Hospital Emergency Department HIVS, Linkage-to-Care T, Negoita S, et al. Linkage to care, antiretroviral treatment initiation, and viral suppression of acute HIV-infected individuals identified from an emergency department-based HIV screening and linkage-to-care program. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(5):621–3.
Koduah Owusu K, Adu-Gyamfi R, Ahmed Z. Strategies to improve linkage to HIV care in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2019;11:321–32.
Labhardt ND, Ringera I, Lejone TI, Klimkait T, Muhairwe J, Amstutz A, et al. Effect of offering same-day ART vs usual health facility referral during home-based HIV testing on linkage to care and viral suppression among adults with HIV in Lesotho: the CASCADE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1103–12.
Dorward J, Drain PK, Osman F, Sookrajh Y, Pillay M, Moodley P, et al. Short communication: early antiretroviral therapy is associated with better viral suppression and less HIV drug resistance after implementation of universal treatment in South Africa. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2020;36(4):297–9.
Godfrey C, Thigpen MC, Crawford KW, et al. Global HIV Antiretroviral drug resistance: a perspective and report of a national institute of allergy and infectious diseases consultation. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_9):S798–800.
Redd AD, Mukonda E, Hu NC, et al. ART adherence, resistance, and long-term HIV viral suppression in postpartum women. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(10):ofaa346.
Ekstrand ML, Shet A, Chandy S, Singh G, Shamsundar R, Madhavan V, et al. Suboptimal adherence associated with virological failure and resistance mutations to first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in Bangalore. India Int Health. 2011;3(1):27–34.
World Health Organization. HIV Drug Resistance Report 2019. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2019. This is an extremely important report by the World Health Organization, summarizing data from recent HIV drug resistance surveys in low- and middle-income countries.
Bertagnolio S, Hermans L, Jordan MR, et al. Clinical impact of pretreatment human immunodeficiency virus drug resistance in people initiating nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2020. This large systematic review included ~31,000 patients and found that individuals with pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR) initiating non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors had an increased risk of virologic failure compared to those without PDR, supporting the WHO’s recommendation to avoid using NNRTIs in countries with high rates of PDR.
World Health Organization. Updated recommendations on first-line and second-line antiretroviral regimens and post-exposure prophylaxis and recommendations on early infant diagnosis of HIV: interim guidelines: supplement to the 2016 consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.
Powell VE, Gibas KM, DuBow J, Krakower DS. Update on HIV preexposure prophylaxis: effectiveness, drug resistance, and risk compensation. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019;21(8):28.
Meloni ST, Chaplin B, Idoko J, Agbaji O, Akanmu S, Imade G, et al. Drug resistance patterns following pharmacy stock shortage in Nigerian Antiretroviral Treatment Program. AIDS Res Ther. 2017;14(1):58.
Lessells RJ, Avalos A, de Oliveira T. Implementing HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing in antiretroviral therapy programs in Africa: needs, opportunities, and challenges. AIDS Rev. 2013;15(4):221–9.
Glass TR, Motaboli L, Nsakala B, Lerotholi M, Vanobberghen F, Amstutz A, et al. The viral load monitoring cascade in a resource-limited setting: a prospective multicentre cohort study after introduction of routine viral load monitoring in rural Lesotho. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220337.
Jewell BL, Mudimu E, Stover J, et al. Potential effects of disruption to HIV programmes in sub-Saharan Africa caused by COVID-19: results from multiple mathematical models. Lancet HIV. 2020;Published online Aug 6 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30211-3.
Van Dyke RB, Patel K, Kagan RM, et al. Antiretroviral drug resistance among children and youth in the United States with perinatal HIV. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(1):133–7.
Zhang Y, Fogel JM, Guo X, Clarke W, Breaud A, Cummings V, et al. Antiretroviral drug use and HIV drug resistance among MSM and transgender women in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2018;32(10):1301–6.
Palumbo PJ, Zhang Y, Fogel JM, Guo X, Clarke W, Breaud A, et al. HIV drug resistance in persons who inject drugs enrolled in an HIV prevention trial in Indonesia, Ukraine, and Vietnam: HPTN 074. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223829.
Gupta RK, Gregson J, Parkin N, Haile-Selassie H, Tanuri A, Andrade Forero L, et al. HIV-1 drug resistance before initiation or re-initiation of first-line antiretroviral therapy in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):346–55.
Anstett K, Brenner B, Mesplede T, Wainberg MA. HIV drug resistance against strand transfer integrase inhibitors. Retrovirology. 2017;14(1):36.
Kintu K, Malaba TR, Nakibuka J, Papamichael C, Colbers A, Byrne K, et al. Dolutegravir versus efavirenz in women starting HIV therapy in late pregnancy (DolPHIN-2): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2020;7(5):e332–9.
Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. 2019; http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Accessed 07/28/2020.
Panel on Antiretroviral Therapy and Medical Management of Children Living with HIV. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in pediatric HIV infection. 2020; http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/pediatricguidelines.pdf. Accessed 7/29/2020.
European AIDS Clinical Society. EAC Guidelines 2020 Version 10.1. 2020; https://www.eacsociety.org/files/guidelines-10.1_5.pdf. Accessed 11/20/2020.
Paediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS (PENTA). PENTA HIV First and Second Line Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines 2019. 2019; https://penta-id.org/hiv/treatment-guidelines/. Accessed 8/24/2020.
Republic of South Africa National Department of Health. 2019 ART Clinical Guidelines for the Management of HIV in Adults, Pregnancy, Adolescents, Children, Infants and Neonates. 2019; https://sahivsoc.org/Files/2019%20ART%20Guideline%2028042020%20pdf.pdf. Accessed 8/24/2020.
U. S. Food and Drug Administration. fda approves drug to treat infants and children with HIV. 06/12/2020; https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-drug-treat-infants-and-children-hiv. Accessed 11/5/2020.
Clutter DS, Jordan MR, Bertagnolio S, Shafer RW. HIV-1 drug resistance and resistance testing. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;46:292–307.
Henegar C, Underwood M, Ragone L, Garges H, Vannappagari V. Trends and characteristics of HIV-1 drug resistance in the United States (2012-2018) (Abstract 521). Paper presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2020; Boston, USA.
Assoumou L, Bocket L, Pallier C, Grude M, Ait-Namane R, Izopet J, et al. Stable prevalence of transmitted drug resistance mutations and increased circulation of non-B subtypes in antiretroviral-naive chronically HIV-infected patients in 2015/2016 in France. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(5):1417–24.
Aldous AM, Castel AD, Parenti DM. D.C. Cohort Executive Committee. Prevalence and trends in transmitted and acquired antiretroviral drug resistance, Washington, DC, 1999-2014. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):474.
Modica S, Rossetti B, Lombardi F, Lagi F, Maffeo M, D'Autilia R, et al. Prevalence and determinants of resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected patients exposed to integrase inhibitors in a large Italian cohort. HIV Med. 2019;20(2):137–46.
Mauskopf J, Fernandez MM, Ghosn J, et al. Systematic literature review of multiclass resistance in heavily treatment experienced persons with HIV. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2019;6(Supplement_2):S871.
Stadeli KM, Richman DD. Rates of emergence of HIV drug resistance in resource-limited settings: a systematic review. Antivir Ther. 2013;18(1):115–23.
Crowell TA, Danboise B. Parikh A, et al. Clin Infect Dis: Pre-treatment and acquired antiretroviral drug resistance among persons living with HIV in four African countries; 2020.
Samuel R, Julian MN, Paredes R, Parboosing R, Moodley P, Singh L, et al. HIV-1 Drug resistance by ultra-deep sequencing following short course zidovudine, single-dose nevirapine, and single-dose tenofovir with emtricitabine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(4):384–9.
Yeganeh N, Kerin T, Ank B, Watts DH, Camarca M, Joao EC, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus antiretroviral resistance and transmission in mother-infant pairs enrolled in a large perinatal study. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(11):1770–7.
Frange P, Avettand-Fenoel V, Veber F, Blanche S, Chaix ML. Prevalence of drug resistance in children recently diagnosed with HIV-1 infection in France (2006-17): impact on susceptibility to first-line strategies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(9):2475–9.
Rojas Sanchez P, Dominguez S. Jimenez De Ory S, et al. Trends in drug resistance prevalence, HIV-1 variants and clinical status in HIV-1-infected pediatric population in Madrid: 1993 to 2015 analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(3):e48–57.
Louis FJ, Segaren N, Desinor O, Beard RS, Jean-Louis R, Chang J, et al. High levels of HIV-1 drug resistance in children who acquired HIV infection through mother to child transmission in the era of option B+, Haiti, 2013 to 2014. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(5):503–7.
Kuhn L, Hunt G, Technau KG, Coovadia A, Ledwaba J, Pickerill S, et al. Drug resistance among newly diagnosed HIV-infected children in the era of more efficacious antiretroviral prophylaxis. AIDS. 2014;28(11):1673–8.
Inzaule SC, Osi SJ, Akinbiyi G, Emeka A, Khamofu H, Mpazanje R, et al. High prevalence of HIV drug resistance among newly diagnosed infants aged <18 months: results from a nationwide surveillance in Nigeria. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;77(1):e1–7.
Poppe LK, Chunda-Liyoka C, Kwon EH, Gondwe C, West JT, Kankasa C, et al. HIV drug resistance in infants increases with changing prevention of mother-to-child transmission regimens. AIDS. 2017;31(13):1885–9.
Corrigan B, Mukui I, Mulenga L, Mthethwa N, Letsie M, Bruno S, et al. Characteristics of treatment-experienced HIV-infected African children and adolescents initiating darunavir and/or etravirine-based antiretroviral treatment. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(7):669–72.
Viani RM, Peralta L, Aldrovandi G, Kapogiannis BG, Mitchell R, Spector SA, et al. Prevalence of primary HIV-1 drug resistance among recently infected adolescents: a multicenter adolescent medicine trials network for HIV/AIDS interventions study. J Infect Dis. 2006;194(11):1505–9.
Kityo C, Sigaloff KC, Sonia Boender T, et al. HIV drug resistance among children initiating first-line antiretroviral treatment in Uganda. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2016;32(7):628–35.
Sorstedt E, Carlander C, Flamholc L, et al. Effect of dolutegravir in combination with Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) on people living with HIV who have pre-existing NRTI mutations. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51(5):733–8.
Demarest J, Underwood M, St Clair M, Dorey D, Brown D, Zolopa A. Short communication: dolutegravir-based regimens are active in integrase strand transfer inhibitor-naive patients with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2018;34(4):343–6.
Cahn P, Madero JS, Arribas JR, et al. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2): week 48 results from two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trials. Lancet 2018.
Lepik KJ, Harrigan PR, Yip B, Wang L, Robbins MA, Zhang WW, et al. Emergent drug resistance with integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens. AIDS. 2017;31(10):1425–34.
Zhang WW, Cheung PK, Oliveira N, Robbins MA, Harrigan PR, Shahid A. Accumulation of multiple mutations in vivo confers cross-resistance to new and existing integrase inhibitors. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(11):1773–6.
Oliveira M, Ibanescu RI, Anstett K, et al. Selective resistance profiles emerging in patient-derived clinical isolates with cabotegravir, bictegravir, dolutegravir, and elvitegravir. Retrovirology. 2018;15(1):56.
Delaugerre C, Rodriguez C, Capitant C, Nere ML, Mercier-Darty M, Carette D, et al. Drug resistance among patients who acquired HIV infection in a preexposure prophylaxis trial. AIDS. 2018;32(16):2353–61.
Landovitz RJ, Donnell D, Clement M, et al. HPTN 083 interim results: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) containing long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) is safe and highly effective for cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. Paper presented at: 23rd International AIDS Conference. 6-10 Jul 2020; Virtual.
Figueroa MIS, O.G.; Gun, A.M.; Belloso, W. Cecchini, D.M. Lopardo, G. Pryluka, D. Rolon, M.J. Fink, V.I. Lloret, S.P. Cahn, P. DRV/R/3TC FDC for HIV-1 treatment naive patients: week 48 results of the ANDES study. Paper presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections,2018; Boston, Massachusetts.
Raffi F, Babiker AG, Richert L, Molina JM, George EC, Antinori A, et al. Ritonavir-boosted darunavir combined with raltegravir or tenofovir-emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults infected with HIV-1: 96 week results from the NEAT001/ANRS143 randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1942–51.
Baldin G, Ciccullo A, Rusconi S, Capetti A, Sterrantino G, Colafigli M, et al. Long-term data on the efficacy and tolerability of lamivudine plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in a multi-centre cohort of HIV-1-infected, virologically suppressed patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;54(6):728–34.
Margolis DA, Gonzalez-Garcia J, Stellbrink HJ, Eron JJ, Yazdanpanah Y, Podzamczer D, et al. Long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine in adults with HIV-1 infection (LATTE-2): 96-week results of a randomised, open-label, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10101):1499–510.
Aboud M, Orkin C, Podzamczer D, Bogner JR, Baker D, Khuong-Josses MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir-rilpivirine for maintenance of virological suppression in adults with HIV-1: 100-week data from the randomised, open-label, phase 3 SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(9):e576–87.
Vizcarra P, Fontecha M, Monsalvo M, Vivancos MJ, Rojo A, Casado JL. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir plus boosted-darunavir dual therapy among highly treatment-experienced patients. Antivir Ther. 2019;24(6):467–71.
Navarro J, Santos JR, Silva A, Burgos J, Falcó V, Ribera E, et al. Effectiveness of once/day dolutegravir plus boosted darunavir as a switch strategy in heavily treated patients with human immunodeficiency virus. Pharmacotherapy. 2019;39(4):501–7.
Capetti AF, Cossu MV, Orofino G, Sterrantino G, Cenderello G, de Socio GV, et al. A dual regimen of ritonavir/darunavir plus dolutegravir for rescue or simplification of rescue therapy: 48 weeks’ observational data. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):658.
Neesgaard B, Pelchen-Matthews A, Ryom L, Florence E, Peters L, Roen A, et al. Uptake and effectiveness of two-drug compared with three-drug antiretroviral regimens among HIV-positive individuals in Europe. AIDS. 2019;33(13):2013–24.
Pierone G, Henegar C, Fusco J, Vannappagari V, Aboud M, Ragone L, et al. Two-drug antiretroviral regimens: an assessment of virologic response and durability among treatment-experienced persons living with HIV in the OPERA((R)) Observational Database. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22(12):e25418.
Saag MS, Benson CA, Gandhi RT, Hoy JF, Landovitz RJ, Mugavero MJ, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2018 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. JAMA. 2018;320(4):379–96.
Lataillade M, Lalezari JP, Kozal M, Aberg JA, Pialoux G, Cahn P, et al. Safety and efficacy of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor prodrug fostemsavir in heavily treatment-experienced individuals: week 96 results of the phase 3 BRIGHTE study. Lancet HIV. 2020;7(11):e740–51.
Lin HH, Lee SSJ, Wang NC, et al. Intramuscular ibalizumab: pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy versus IV administration (Abstract 438). Paper presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 201713-16 Feb, 2017; Seattle, WA.
Khanlou H, Gathe J, Schrader S, Towner W, Weinheimer S, Lewis S. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of ibalizumab in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients: a phase 2b study (Abstract H2-804). 51st Interscience Confererence on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 17-20 Sept 2011; Chicago, IL.
Emu B, Fessel J, Schrader S, Kumar P, Richmond G, Win S, et al. Phase 3 study of ibalizumab for multidrug-resistant HIV-1. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(7):645–54.
Weinheimer S, Cohen Z, Marsolais C, Lewis S. Ibalizumab susceptibility in patient HIV isolates resistant to antiretrovirals (Abstract 561). Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistics Infections; 4-7 Mar, 2018; Boston, MA.
Zhang XQ, Sorensen M, Fung M, Schooley RT. Synergistic in vitro antiretroviral activity of a humanized monoclonal anti-CD4 antibody (TNX-355) and enfuvirtide (T-20). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(6):2231–3.
Pham HT, Xiao MA, Principe MA, Wong A, Mesplede T. Pharmaceutical, clinical, and resistance information on doravirine, a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Drugs Context. 2020;9:1–11.
Soulie C, Santoro MM, Storto A, Abdi B, Charpentier C, Armenia D, et al. Prevalence of doravirine-associated resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-experienced patients from two large databases in France and Italy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(4):1026–30.
Sterrantino G, Borghi V, Callegaro AP, Bruzzone B, Saladini F, Maggiolo F, et al. Prevalence of predicted resistance to doravirine in HIV-1-positive patients after exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;53(4):515–9.
Orkin C, Molina JM, Yazdanpanah Y, et al. Analysis of protocol-defined virologic failure through 96 weeks from a phase II trial (P011) of islatravir and doravirine in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 (Abstract P047). HIV Glasgow; 5-8 Oct 2020; Virtual.
Bar-On Y, Gruell H, Schoofs T, Pai JA, Nogueira L, Butler AL, et al. Safety and antiviral activity of combination HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies in viremic individuals. Nat Med. 2018;24(11):1701–7.
Lynch RM, Boritz E, Coates EE, et al. Virologic effects of broadly neutralizing antibody VRC01 administration during chronic HIV-1 infection. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(319):319ra206.
Begley R, Lutz J, Rhee M, et al. Lenacapavir sustained delivery formulation supports 6-month dosing interval. AIDS 2020: 23rd International AIDS Conference 6-10 Jul 2020, 2020; Virtual.
Margot RR, Parvangada P, Martin R, Hyland R, Rhee M, Callebaut C. Lenacapavir resistance analysis in a phase 1b clinical proof-of-concept study. HIV Glasgow 2020; 5-8 Oct 2020, 2020; Virtual.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koay, W.L.A., Kose-Otieno, J. & Rakhmanina, N. HIV Drug Resistance in Children and Adolescents: Always a Challenge?. Curr Epidemiol Rep 8, 97–107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-021-00268-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-021-00268-3