Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lattice numerical modeling of the effects of synthetic gas flow rate and pre-existing cleat dimensions on the crack propagation and cavity growth in UCG process

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effects of synthetic gas flow rates and its viscosity on the crack propagation and cavity growth of the UCG process have been numerically investigated. Numerical modeling is performed using the discrete element method and lattice model, and the effects of flow rate and pre-existing cleat dimensions on the cavity growth have been studied. For this purpose, the fracture fluid pressure, the aperture (primary cleat or secondary cracks aperture), and the number of formed microcracks have been analyzed to evaluate the cavity growth rate. The numerical modeling results show that by increasing the value of syngas flow rate by 2, 5, and 10 times, the fracture fluid pressure and crack aperture increase in the samples. On the other hand, fracture fluid pressure and number of formed microcracks in the UCG process decrease as the pre-existing cleat dimensions increase by 2, 3 and 4 times. As a result, the probability of growth of the cavity decreases. Additionally, the results of numerical models have shown that simultaneous increase of the syngas flow rate and pre-existing cleat dimensions has less effect on crack growth rate in cases that the rate of synthetic gas injection is equal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data and models generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

References

  1. Couch GR (2009) Underground coal gasification. IEA Clean Coal Center, International Energy Agency, London, ISBN 978–92–9029–471–9

  2. Burton E, Friedmann J, Upadhye R (2006) Best practices in underground coal gasification. Draft. US DOE contract no W-7405-Eng-48. Livermore, CA, USA, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  3. Bhutto A, Bazmi A, Zahedi G (2013) Underground coal gasification: from fundamentals to applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 39(1):189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nitao JJ, Camp DW, Buscheck TA, White JA, Burton GC, Wagoner JL, Chen M (2011) Progress on a new integrated 3-D UCG simulator and its initial application. In:International Pittsburgh Coal Conference

  5. Daggupati S, Mandapati RN, Mahajani MS (2010) Laboratory studies on combustion cavity growth in lignite coal blocks in the context of underground coal gasification. Energy 35(6):2374–2386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Perkins G (2005) Mathematical modelling of underground coal gasification. PhD Dissertation, University of New South Wales

  7. Nourozieh H, Kariznovi M, Chen Z, Abedi J (2010) Simulation study of underground coal gasification in Alberta reservoirs: geological structure and process modeling. Energy Fuels 2010:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Su F, Itakura K, Deguchi G, Ohga K (2016) Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shahbazi M, Najafi M, Fatehi Marji M (2019) On the mitigating environmental aspects of a vertical well in underground coal gasification method. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 24:373–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9816-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang T, Zhou W, Chen J, Xiaoa X, Li Y, Zhao X (2014) Simulation of hydraulic fracturing using particle flow method and application in a coal mine. Int J Coal Geol 121(2014):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou J, Zhang L, Pan Z, Han Z (2016) Numerical investigation of fluid-driven near-borehole fracture propagation in laminated reservoir rock using PFC2D. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 36:719–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang T, Hua W, Elsworthc D, Zhoua W, Zhoud W, Zhaoa X, Zhaoa L (2017) The effect of natural fractures on hydraulic fracturing propagation in coal seams. J Pet Sci Eng 150(2017):180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoon JS, Zanga A, Stephansson, O, Hofmannb H, Zimmermann G (2017) Discrete element modelling of hydraulic fracture propagation and dynamic interaction with natural fractures in hard rock. Procedia Engineering 191(2017):1023–1031. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of EUROCK 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.275

  14. Zhou J, Zhang L (2017) Hydraulic fracturing process by using a modified two-dimensional particle flow code-method and validation. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), Computational Fluid Dynamics An International Journal January 2017. https://doi.org/10.1504/PCFD.2017.081719

  15. Abdollahipour A, Marji MF, Bafghi AY, Gholamnejad J (2016a) Time-dependent crack propagation in a poro-elastic medium using a fully coupled hydro-mechanical displacement discontinuity method. Int J Fract 199(1):71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdollahipour A, Fatehi MM, Yarahmadi Bafghi AR, Gholamnejad J (2016b) Numerical investigation of effect of crack geometrical parameters on hydraulic fracturing process of hydrocarbon reservoirs. J Min Environ 7(2):205–214

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bakhshi E, Rasouli V, Ghorbani A, Fatehi MM, Damjanac B, Wan X (2019) Lattice numerical simulations of lab-scale hydraulic fracture and natural interface interaction. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(5):1315–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paine AS, Please CP (1994) An improved model of fracture propagation by gas during rock blasting some analytical results. Int. J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 31(6):699–706. 0148-9062(94)E0003-K.

  19. Goodarzi M, Mohammadi S, Jafari A (2014) Numerical analysis of rock fracturing by gas pressure using the extended finite element method. Pet Sci 12:304–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-015-0017-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Munjiza A, Latham JP, and Andrews KRF (2000) Detonation gas model for combined finitediscrete element simulation of fracture and fragmentation. Int. J. Numerical Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0207(20001230)49:12<1495::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-5.

  21. Nilson RH, Proffer WJ, Duff RE (1985) Modeling of gas-driven fractures induced by propellant combustion within a borehole. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 22:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(85)92589-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cho SH, Risei K, Kato M, Nakamura Y, Kaneko K (2002) Development of numerical simulatin method for dyanmic fracture propagation due to gas pressurization and stress wave. ISRM Regional Sym. (3rd Korea-Japan Joint Symposium) on Rock engineering problem and approaches in underground construction

  23. Cho SH, Nakamura Y, Kaneko K (2004) Dynamic fracture process analysis of rock subjected to stress wave and gas pressurization. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.03.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiangchun L, Chao W, Caihong Z, Hua Y (2011) The propagation speed of the cracks in coal body containing gas. The First International Symposium on Mine Safety Science and Engineering. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.004

  25. Zhao Y, Hu Y (1995) Experimental study of the law of effective stress by methane pressure. Chin J Geotech Eng 17(3):26–31 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu S, Zhao W (2005) Analysis of effective stress in adsorbed methane-coal system. Chin J Geotech Eng 24(10):1674–1678 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Itasca consulting group, Inc. XSite Ver 2.0.73, 2018, (www.itascacg.com)

  28. Maliska CR (2023). Fundamentals of computational fluid dynamics, ISSN 0926–5112, Springer, Volume 135

  29. Engineering toolbox website (www.engineeringtoolbox.com)

  30. Stanczyk K, Kapusta K, Wiatowski M, Swiadrowski J, Smolinski A, Rogut J, Kotyrba A (2011) Experimental simulation of hard coal underground gasification for hydrogen production. Fuel 91(2012):40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yin Z, Chen Z, Chang J, Hu Z, Ma H, Feng R (2019) Crack initiation characteristics of gas-containing coal under gas pressures. Geofluids 2019:12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5387907

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) for supporting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Yazd University, Safayieh, P.O. Box, Yazd, 89195-741, Iran

    Mohammadreza Shahbazi, Mehdi Najafi & Mohammad Fatehi Marji

  2. School of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Abolfazl Abdollahipour

Authors
  1. Mohammadreza Shahbazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehdi Najafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Fatehi Marji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abolfazl Abdollahipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Najafi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M. Shahbazi, M. Najafi, M. Fatehi Marji, and A. Abdollahipour declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Adriano Fagali de Souza.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahbazi, M., Najafi, M., Fatehi Marji, M. et al. Lattice numerical modeling of the effects of synthetic gas flow rate and pre-existing cleat dimensions on the crack propagation and cavity growth in UCG process. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46, 348 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04893-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04893-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation