Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

On the mitigating environmental aspects of a vertical well in underground coal gasification method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Underground coal gasification (UCG) is an energy production pathway in underground coal deposits with the potential advantage of decreasing the greenhouse gas emissions during the energy extraction process. The environmental benefits of UCG are mainly due to eliminating (i) conventional mining operations, (ii) the presence of coal miners in the underground, (iii) coal washing and fines disposal, and (iv) coal stockpiling and coal transportation activities. Furthermore, UCG has a capacity of great potential to provide a clean coal energy source by the implementing carbon capture and storage techniques as part of the energy extraction process. In this method, coal seams in the underground were converted into syngas including hydrogen (H2), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4) gasses with an advanced thermochemical process. UCG operation effected significant geomechanical changes to the overburden strata. In this process, the vertical well (especially the production well) was mainly affected by the mechanical stresses and the thermal stress, induced by the high syngas temperature. This high temperature changed the mechanical, thermal, and physical properties of the coal seam and its surrounding rocks (the host rocks), finally causing instability of the vertical well, while leading to serious production and environmental problems. One of these environmental issues is the possibility of syngas leakage in to the environment, resulting in water pollution and acidification. In addition, the released syngas could trigger global warming and air pollution. This research evaluated environmental aspects of UCG vertical well (production well) based on the stability analysis. Therefore, a flow sheet form was developed for three-dimensional thermomechanical numerical modeling of an UCG vertical well by explicit Lagrangian finite difference method. In this model, a criterion was established based on normalized yielded zone area to assess the stability conditions. The methodology was able to capture all factors that influence the instability of UCG well while selecting suitable mud pressure and lining system during the well drilling process. Hence, when wellbore integrity issues arose during drilling, the mitigation strategies were applied to rectify these problems. The results demonstrated that the vertical well should be drilled at a constant mud pressure of 9 MPa (megapascal), thus causing minimum environmental problems. The thermomechanical modeling provided an opportunity to assess the potential environmental impacts and identify reliable global climate change mitigation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbarzadeh H, Chalaturnyk RJ (2013) Coupled fluid-thermal-mechanical analyses of a deep underground coal gasification cavity. J Archit Civil Eng Quest J 1(1):01–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbarzadeh H, Chalaturnyk RJ (2016) Sequentially coupled flow-geomechanical modeling of underground coal gasification for a three-dimensional problem. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 21(4):577–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2005) Basic design of Tabas coal mine project, report-mining. Vol 1 of 5

  • Brown KM (2012) In situ coal gasification: an emerging technology. Proc Am Soc Min Reclamat 2012:51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton E, Friedmann J, Upadhye R (2006) Best practices in underground coal gasification, Draft. US DOE contract no W-7405-Eng-48. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch GR (2009) Underground coal gasification. IEA Clean Coal Center, International Energy Agency, London ISBN 978-92-9029-471-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Daggupati S, Mandapati RN, Mahajani MS (2010) Laboratory studies on combustion cavity growth in lignite coal blocks in the context of underground coal gasification. Energy 35(6):2374–2386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das B, Chatterjee R (2017) Wellbore stability analysis and prediction of minimum mud weight for few wells in Krishna-Godavari Basin, India. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining sciences, Dept. of Applied Geophysics, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.12.018

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elahi SM (2016) Geomechanical modeling of underground coal gasification (Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary)

  • Elyasi A, Goshtasbi K (2015) Numerical modeling of the stability of horizontal multidrain oil wells. China Ocean Eng 29(5):719–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjar E, Holt RM, Raaen AM, Risnes R, Horsrud P (2008) Petroleum related rock mechanics. Elsevier

  • Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to rock mechanics, vol 2. Wiley, New York, p 576

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg DW (1977) Ground subsidence resulting from underground gasification of coal.UCRL-52255. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California

  • Gregg DW, Edgar TF (1978) Underground coal gasification. Chem Eng J 24(5):753–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Imran M, Kumar D, Kumar N, Qayyum A, Saeed A, Bhatti MS (2014) Environmental concerns of underground coal gasification. Renew Sust Energ Rev 31:600–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itasca (2012) User manual for FLAC3D, version.5.0. Itasca Consulting Group Inc, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidi E, Amani M (2014) Numerical wellbore stability analysis using discrete element models. Pet Sci Technol 32(8):974–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MM, Mmbaga JP, Shirazi AS, Liu Q, Gupta R (2015) Modelling underground coal gasification—a review. Energies 8(11):12603–12668. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81112331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laciak M, Kostúr K, Durdán M, Kačur J, Flegner P (2016) The analysis of the underground coal gasification in experimental equipment. Energy 114:332–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laouafa F, Farret R, Vidal-Gilbert S, Kazmierczak JB (2016) Overview and modeling of mechanical and thermomechanical impact of underground coal gasification exploitation. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 21(4):547–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo X, Tan Q, Luo C, Wang Z (2008) Microseismic monitoring of burn front in an underground coal gasification experiment. In The 42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association

  • Luo Y, Coertzen M, Dumble S (2009) Comparison of UCG cavity growth with CFD model predictions. In 7th International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries CRISO, Melbourne, Australia

  • Marg N (2009) Environmental impact assessment for proposed underground coal gasification (UCG) pilot project at Vastan mine block, Surat in Gujarat. National Environmental Engineering Research Institute

  • McInnis J, Singh S, Huq I (2016) Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change via the implementation of underground coal gasification. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 21(4):479–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan PJ, Hawkes CD (2001) Borehole stability, sand production and microseismic monitoring. Innovations for Horizontal Wells, SPE/CIM Horizontal Well Conference, Calgary, Alberta

  • Mellors R, Yang X, White JA, Ramirez A, Wagoner J, Camp DW (2016) Advanced geophysical underground coal gasification monitoring. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 21(4):487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanto S, Singh K, Chakraborty T, Basu D (2014) Cyclic thermo-mechanical analysis of wellbore in underground compressed air energy storage cavern. Geotech Geol Eng 32(3):601–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9736-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi M (2014) Thermo-mechanical modeling of panels dimensions in underground coal gasification method - PhD Thesis, Shahrood University of Technology, Iran. (In Persian)

  • Najafi M, Jalali SM, KhaloKakaie R (2014) Thermal–mechanical–numerical analysis of stress distribution in the vicinity of underground coal gasification (UCG) panels. Int J Coal Geol 134:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitao J, Buscheck T, Ezzedine S, Friedman S, Camp D (2010) An integrated 3-D UCG model for prediction cavity growth, production gas, and interaction with the host environment. 27th Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Nitao JJ, Camp DW, Buscheck TA, White JA, Burton GC, Wagoner JL, Chen M (2011) Progress on a new integrated 3-D UCG simulator and its initial application. International Pittsburgh Coal Conference

  • Otto C, Kempka T, Kapusta K, Stańczyk K (2016) Fault reactivation can generate hydraulic short circuits in underground coal gasification—new insights from regional-scale thermo-mechanical 3D modeling. Minerals 6(4):101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins G, Sahajwalla V (2006) A numerical study of the effects of operating conditions and coal properties on cavity growth in underground coal gasification. Energy Fuel 20(2):596–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roddy DJ, Younger PL (2010) Underground coal gasification with CCS: a pathway to decarbonising industry. Energy Environ Sci 3(4):400–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarraf A (2012) CFD simulation of underground coal gasification. MSc Thesis, Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta

  • Sarraf A, Mmbaga J, Gupta P, Hayes RE (2011) Modeling cavity growth during underground coal gasification. COMSOL conferences in Boston

  • Stańczyk K, Kapusta K, Wiatowski M, Świądrowski J, Smoliński A, Rogut J, Kotyrba A (2012) Experimental simulation of hard coal underground gasification for hydrogen production. Fuel 91(1):40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synfuels SH (2012) Swan Hills in-situ coal gasification technology development final outcomes report. Alberta Innovates-Energy and Environment Solutions Report

  • Tan Q, Luo X, Li S (2008) Numerical modeling of thermal stress in a layered rock mass. In the 42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association

  • Tian H (2013) Development of a thermo-mechanical model for rocks exposed to high temperatures during underground coal gasification. PhD thesis in RWTH Aachen University, Potsdam

  • Vorobiev OY, Morris JP, Antoun TH, Friedmann S J (2008) Geomechanical simulations related to UCG activities. In International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Wiatowski M, Kapusta K, Ludwik-Pardała M, Stańczyk K (2016) Ex-situ experimental simulation of hard coal underground gasification at elevated pressure. Fuel 184:401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Sarhosis V, Sheng Y (2014) Thermal–mechanical modelling around the cavities of underground coal gasification. J Energy Inst 87(4):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoback MD (2007) Reservoir geomechanics, First published. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Yazd University, Safayieh, Yazd, 89195-741, Iran

    Mohammadreza Shahbazi, Mehdi Najafi & Mohammad Fatehi Marji

Authors
  1. Mohammadreza Shahbazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehdi Najafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Fatehi Marji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Najafi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahbazi, M., Najafi, M. & Marji, M.F. On the mitigating environmental aspects of a vertical well in underground coal gasification method. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 24, 373–398 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9816-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9816-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation